International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) Volume: 04 Issue: 05 | May -2017
www.irjet.net
e-ISSN: 2395 -0056 p-ISSN: 2395-0072
A Review of GRIHA Certification with Real Life Project Sachin Nalawade1, Rahulkumar Patel2, Milind Tank3, Hardik Tank4, Nigam Patel5, Gaurav Patel6 Professor, Dept. of civil Engineering, DYPIEMR college, Maharashtra, India Year UG Student , Dept. of civil Engineering, DYPIEMR college, Maharashtra, India ---------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------qualify for the points. GRIHA has total 100 point system Abstract - Due to rapid Industrialization and Urbanization consisting of some mandatory points to be met while there is an increase in environmental problems. One of the the rest are optional points. Innovation points are also major problems among this is safe and sound disposal of solid available for project over and above the 100 point wastes. To develop new methods that introduce the building to system. This means that a project can apply for a a new path for developing a green building at more economic maximum of 104 points. But the final scoring is done cost indulged with new researches and technologies working out of 100 points. There are Different levels of on different green ratings will lead to increase the focus on certification (one star to five stars) awarded based on rating system of green building and attract more researchers the number of points earned. The minimum points from different countries. Different countries have different required for certification is 51. According to scoring green rating systems such as LEED, BREEM, AGBR, IGBC, point 50 to 60 points, 61 to 70 points, 71 to 80 points, GRIHA etc. Establishment of new research institutes leading to and 81 to 90 points building project shall get one star, the researches in field of green buildings will attract more ‘two stars’, ‘three stars’ and ‘four stars’ respectively. builders and stake holders, putting footsteps towards greener The maximum rating viz. five stars will get to building habitat which may also enhance country’s infrastructure. scoring 91 to 100 points. There are in total of 34 criteria’s in the GRIHA methodology. 1
2,3,4,5,6Final
In this paper by considering GRIHA points we have made a review on The Polite Precisa Building, Pune, Maharashtra, India. This will help the developers for applying GRIHA on their new upcoming projects.
Key Words: GRIHA, RATING SYSTEM, GREEN BUILDING, LEED, GHg 1.INTRODUCTION
There is increase in demand in construction sector and real estate development in our country. The construction industry contributes around 10% of India’s GDP and is growing about 9%.Urban areas as one of the major contribution to Green house Gas (GHG) emission, with buildings along contributing around 40% of total GHG emission. In India there are two green building rating systems which are: LEED India (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) administered by the Indian Green building Council (IGBC) and GRIHA-Green Rating for Integrated Habitat Assessment developed by TERI (The Energy and Research Institute). TERI’s green building rating system GRIHA has been developed on instrumental tool to rate the environmental performance of a building. GRIHA is a guiding tool system where points are earned for meeting the design and performance of the criteria. Each criterion has a number of points assigned to it. To meet the criterion, the project would © 2017, IRJET
|
Impact Factor value: 5.181
|
2. Case study – The Polite Precisa Building, Pune, Maharashtra, India The Polite group has constructed residential building in a plot area 2250sqm at survey no 181, Ravet. This building has been provided 4 star GRIHA rating (Pre certification) by Association for Development and Research Of Sustainable Habitats (ADaRSH). The building has 12floor with total built up area of 4252.63sqm The building has been constructed keeping in mind the existing feature of site so that the nature is least affecting the nature. It is Develop taking into consideration of building layout for adequate solar orientation and proper ventilation. By applying these features it will result into lower temperature during summer. The energy consumption in this building is estimated to be about 44.18 kW hr/m2/year in comparison to the consumption of about 100 kW hr/m2 /year for other air conditioned buildings. No municipal water supply is required after the first monsoon with lit of underground tank that has been optimized rainwater harvesting and consumption pattern of the building. ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal
|
Page 427