Design of Sewage Treatment Plant of 50 KLPD to Serve 300 Residents of Sarita Vihar Staff Quarters of

Page 1


International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 12 Issue: 05 | May 2025 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

Design of Sewage Treatment Plant of 50 KLPD to Serve 300 Residents of Sarita Vihar Staff Quarters of DMRC

1Student of Bachelor of Technology in Civil Engineering, Lingaya’s Vidyapeeth, Faridabad, India

2Student of Bachelor of Technology in Civil Engineering, Lingaya’s Vidyapeeth, Faridabad, India

Abstract -This paper outlines the design of a 50 KiloLiters Per Day (KLPD) Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) for the Sarita Vihar Staff Quarters of Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC). The plant aims to sustainably manage domestic sewage from 300 residents, ensuring compliance with environmental regulations. The design employs a multi-stage process including screening, grit removal, primary sedimentation, activated sludge treatment, secondary clarification, sludge digestion, and disinfection.Materialselection,hydrauliccalculations,and adherence to IS codes are emphasized. The treated effluent meets CPCB norms for exercise in gardening and flushing. The paper provides detailed design parameters, construction methodology, and cost analysis, pressing the factory’spartinpromotingindirectwaterfrugality.

Key Words: Sewage Treatment Plant (STP), 50 KLPD, DMRC, Activated Sludge Process, CPCB Standards, Sludge Digestion.

1. INTRODUCTION

UrbanizationinDelhihasboostedpressureonwastewater operation systems. The Sarita Vihar Staff Quarters, housing 300 DMRC employees, requires a decentralized STPtomitigateenvironmentalpollutionandenablewater reuse. Conventional centralized systems are often inefficient for small communities, necessitating compact, cost-effective solutions. This paper details the design of a 50 KLPD STP using biological treatment processes, aligning with IS codes and sustainability goals.Sludge Digestion.

1.1Scope of The Project

Theprimaryscopeofthisstudyis:

1. To design a 50 KLPD (Kilo-Liters Per Day) sewage treatment plant for the Sarita Vihar DMRC staff quarters, ensuring compliance with CentralPollutionControlBoard(CPCB)standards.

2. To adopt an efficient and cost-effective treatment process that minimizes energy consumption while maximizing treated water quality.

3. To ensure sustainable sludge management by incorporating anaerobic digestion and sludge dryingbedsforsafedisposalorreuse.

4. To facilitate water recycling by producing treated effluent suitable for non-potable applications,reducingfreshwaterdemand.

2.MATERIAL USED

2.1 Reinforced Cement Concrete (RCC) Structures

 Concrete Grade: M25 (as per IS 456:2000) for tanks,foundations,andstructuralelements.

 Reinforcement Steel: Fe 500D grade (as per IS 1786:2008)forhightensilestrength.

 Waterproofing: Bituminous coating and epoxy liningtopreventleakage(asper IS 2645:1975).

2.2 Masonry Works

 Bricks: First-class burnt clay bricks (as per IS 1077:1992) for boundary walls and ancillary structures.

 Mortar: Cement-sand mortar (1:4 ratio) for brickworkandplastering.

2.3 Piping and Conduits

 Sewer Pipes:

o HDPE pipes (as per IS 4984:2020) for external drainage due to corrosion resistance.

2.4 Chemical and Disinfection Materials

2.4.1 Coagulants and Flocculants

 Alum (Aluminium Sulfate): Used in primary treatmentforsuspendedsolidsremoval.

 Polyelectrolyte: Anionic polymer for sludge dewatering.

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 12 Issue: 05 | May 2025 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

2.4.2 Disinfection Agents

 Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl): 5-10 mg/L dosage for final effluent disinfection (as per IS 1061:2018).

 Chlorine Contact Tank: FRP (Fiber Reinforced Plastic)constructionforcorrosionresistance.

3. PROJECT DETAILS

3.1 Population and Sewage Generation Estimation

3.1.1 Population Served

 Total Residents:300(DMRCstaffandfamilies).

 Assumed Water Consumption: 150 liters per capita per day (LPCD) as per IS 1172:1993 (Indian Standard for Basic Requirements for Water Supply, Drainage, and Sanitation).

3.1.2 Sewage Generation Calculation

 Total Water Consumption = 300 persons × 150 LPCD= 45,000 liters/day (45 KLD)

 Sewage Generation (assuming 80% return flow) =45KLD×0.8= 36 KLD

 Design Capacity (with 20% safety margin for peakflow)= 50 KLPD

3.2 Influent Sewage Characteristics

Parameter

BiochemicalOxygen Demand(BOD)

3.3 Site-Specific Considerations

3.3.1 Land Availability

Total Area Required: ~200m²(including buffer zone).

 Layout Plan:

o Compact Design: Sequential arrangement of units to minimize footprint.

o Underground vs. Aboveground: Partially underground for aesthetic and space-savingbenefits.

3.3.2 Hydraulic Loading Conditions

 Peak Flow Factor: 1.5 (as per IS 2470:1985 for small-scaleSTPs).

 Design Flow:50KLD(average), 75 KLD (peak).

3.3.3 Climatic Factors

 Temperature: Delhi’s average (15°C–40°C) affectsmicrobialactivityinbiologicaltreatment.

 Monsoon Impact: Increased inflow dilution; grit chambersdesignedforhigherflowrates.

3.4 Treatment Objectives and Effluent Standards

3.4.1 Treated Water Quality Targets

350 ≤350 IS3025(Part 44):1993 ChemicalOxygen Demand(COD)

600 ≤600 APHA5220D

TotalSuspended Solids(TSS) 300400 ≤400 IS3025(Part 17):1984 pH 6.5–8.5

IS3025(Part 11):1983

TotalNitrogen(as N)

≤50 IS3025(Part 34):1988

3.4.2 Reuse Applications

 Gardening: Treated water meets IS 10500:2012 (ClassA)forirrigation.

 Flushing/Toilet Use: Complies with CPB 2015 normsfornon-potablereuse.

International Research Journal of Engineering and

Volume: 12 Issue: 05 | May 2025 www.irjet.net

3.5 Process Flow Diagram (PFD) and Unit Operations

3.5.1 Treatment Stages

1. Preliminary Treatment

o Coarse Screening (20 mm) → Fine Screening(5mm)→GritChamber.

2. Primary Treatment

o Primary Sedimentation Tank (Detention Time:2hrs).

3. Secondary Treatment

o Activated Sludge Process (ASP) → SecondaryClarifier.

4. Tertiary Treatment (Optional)

o Sand Filtration → Chlorination (NaOCl dosing).

5. Sludge Management

o Anaerobic Digester → Sludge Drying Beds.

3.5.2 Key Design

for Each Unit

: Solar-powered aerators forsustainability.

3.7 Summary of Project Specifications Aspect Specification

Design Capacity

KLPD(75KLPDpeak)

Treatment Process ASP+Chlorination Land Requirement

Effluent Standards CPCBReuseNorms

Sludge Handling DryingBeds+Composting

4. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN

4.1 Design Basis and Assumptions

3.6 Power and Utility Requirements

Flow(Qpeak)

(Part 1):1985

(Part 1):1985

KLD(75 m³/day) -

IS12288:1987

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 12 Issue: 05 | May 2025 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

4.2 Design of Preliminary Treatment Units

4.2.1 Screening Unit

 Function: Remove large debris (plastics, rags, etc.).

 Design:

o Coarse Screen (20 mm spacing)

 Width=0.6m,Depth=0.8m

 Velocity = 0.6 m/sec (to prevent gritdeposition)

o Fine Screen (5 mm spacing)

4.2.2 Grit Chamber

 Mechanicallycleaned(SS304)

 Slope=45°forself-cleaning

 Type:AeratedGritChamber(DetentionTime=2–3min)

 Design Calculations:

o Volume (V) = Qpeak × Detention Time = 75m³/day×(3/1440)days= 0.156 m³

o Dimensions:L ×W ×D=1.5m×0.5m× 0.5m

o AirSupply=0.3m³/minpermeterlength

4.3 Design of Primary Treatment (Primary Sedimentation Tank)

4.3.1 Tank Dimensions

 Surface Loading Rate = 30 m³/m²/day (IS 3406:1987)

 Required Surface Area (A) = Qavg / Loading Rate=50/30= 1.67 m²

 Tank Diameter (Circular Tank) = √(4 × A/π) = 1.46 m → Take 2 m

 Side Water Depth (SWD) =2.5m

 Detention Time =Volume/Qavg=(π×1²×2.5) /50≈ 4 hours

4.3.2 Sludge Collection

 Sludge Quantity =0.8kgTSS/m³sewage

 Daily Sludge Production = 50 m³/day × 0.8 kg/m³= 40 kg/day

4.4 Design of Secondary Treatment (Activated Sludge Process)

4.4.1 Aeration Tank Design

 BOD Load = 50 m³/day × 300 mg/L = 15 kg BOD/day

 F/M Ratio =0.3(Assumedforextendedaeration)

 MLSS Required = BOD Load / (F/M) = 15 / 0.3 = 50 kg

 Volume of Aeration Tank (V) = MLSS / MLSS Concentration=50/3= 16.67 m³

 Dimensions: L × W × D = 4 m × 2 m × 2.1 m (EffectiveDepth=2m+Freeboard0.1m)

4.4.2 Oxygen Requirement

 Theoretical O₂ Demand =1.5kgO₂/kgBOD

 Total O₂ Required =15kgBOD/day×1.5= 22.5 kg O₂/day

 Aeration System: Fine Bubble Diffusers (O₂ TransferEfficiency=8%)

 Air Flow Rate = (22.5 / 0.08) / (24 × 60) = 0.2 m³/min

4.4.3 Secondary Clarifier

 Overflow Rate =20m³/m²/day(IS12288:1987)

 Surface Area Required =Qavg/OverflowRate= 50/20= 2.5 m²

 Diameter =√(4×2.5/π)= 1.78 m → Adopt 2 m

 Depth =3m(IncludingSludgeZone)

4.5 Sludge Handling and Disposal

4.5.1 Sludge Digestion Tank

 Sludge Quantity = 40 kg/day (Primary) + 20 kg/day(Secondary)= 60 kg/day

 Volatile Solids (VS) = 70% of TSS → 42 kg VS/day

 Digester Volume = VS Loading Rate = 1 kg VS/m³/day

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 12 Issue: 05 | May 2025 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

 Required Volume =42/1= 42 m³

 Dimensions:4m(Dia)×3.5m(Height)

4.5.2 Sludge Drying Beds

 Sludge Loading Rate =100kg/m²/year

 Bed Area Required = (60 kg/day × 365) / 100 = 219 m²

 Number of Beds:4beds(each7m×8m)

4.6 Disinfection Unit (Chlorination)

 Chlorine Dose =5mg/L

 Daily Chlorine Requirement = 50 m³/day × 5

g/m³= 250 g/day

 Contact Time =30min

 Contact Tank Volume =Qpeak×t=(75m³/day)

×(30/1440)= 1.56 m³

4.7 Summary of Design Parameters

5.1.2 Graphical Representation of Removal Efficiency

Figure 1: BOD and COD Removal Efficiency

5. Results

5.1 Effluent Quality After Treatment

5.1.1 Comparison of Influent vs. Effluent Parameters

Key Observations:

 BOD removal >95% indicateseffectivebiological treatment.

 TSS removal >94% due to efficient sedimentationandfiltration.

 Disinfection (Chlorination) ensures fecal coliformsarewithinreuselimits.

BOD

International Research Journal of

Volume: 12 Issue: 05 | May 2025 www.irjet.net

5.2 Sludge Generation and Management

5.2.1 Sludge Quantities Sludge

5.2.2 Sludge Drying Bed Performance

 Drying Time:7–10days(Delhiclimate).

 Final Sludge Cake: 30% solids → Safe for composting.

5.3 Energy Consumption Analysis

5.3.1 Energy Efficiency Measures

 Solar-powered aerators can reduce grid dependencyby 30%

 VFD-controlled pumps optimize flow rates, saving 15% energy

5.4 Cost Analysis

5.4.1 Capital Cost Breakdown

5.4.2 Operational Cost (Monthly)

5.4.3 Payback Period (If Reused for Gardening/Flushing)

 Water Savings: 50 KL/day × ₹20/KL = ₹1,000/day (₹30,000/month)

 Payback Period =CapitalCost/(Savings–OPEX) ≈ 8–10 years

5.5 Compliance with Regulatory Standards

 CPCB Reuse Standards:Fullycompliantfor nonpotable applications (gardening,flushing).

 IS 3307:2017 (Sludge Disposal): Sludge meets ClassBcompoststandards.

5.6 Summary of Key Results Aspect Outcome

Effluent Quality BOD≤10mg/L,TSS≤20mg/L

Sludge Handling 60kg/day→Composted/Dried

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 12 Issue: 05 | May 2025 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

Aspect Outcome

Energy Use

116.4kWh/day(OptimizablewithSolar)

Cost Efficiency ₹2.05LCapEx,₹48K/monthOpEx

6. Construction Methodology

1. Site Preparation: Leveling and soil testing (IS 1498:1970).

2. Excavation:Depthof4mfortanks.

3. Concrete Work: M25 grade concrete (IS 456:2000).

4. Installation: Sequential assembly of screens, pumps,andblowers.

5. Testing:Leakagechecksandtrialruns.

7. References

1. IS456:2000–ConcreteDesign.

2. CPCB(2015). Effluent Discharge Standards

3. Metcalf & Eddy (2014). Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse.

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.