COECT EXCLUSIVE MAGAZINE
T.I.Ps
Trauma Informed Parents ISSUE No.18 November 2025
IN THIS ISSUE: Developing a TraumaInformed practice in the family courts
Birth Family Visits: The importance of using Trauma-Informed Language
Creating Calm: How Havening Techniques® Support Parents and Professionals Facing Compassion Fatigue Photo: ©Coect
Parenting Through the Pushback: Building Trust in the Teen Years COECT survey: Are family courts fit for purpose?
Meet the Team! Executive Editor - Sarah Naish
Executive Editor - Sair Penna
Managing Editor - Kathryn Talbot
Contributor - Jessica Spenceley
Contributor - Russ HartlandShaw
Contributor - Sarah Dillon
Contributor -Natalie Freeman
Contributor - Lucy Barnes
Sarah is a Therapeutic Parent, an Adopter of five siblings, Best selling international Author, Keynote Speaker and founder of three Independent Therapeutic Fostering Agencies. Sarah is also and cofounder and CEO at The Centre of Excellence in Child Trauma C.I.C.
Kathryn is co-founder and managing editor of the TIPs magazine, at The Centre of Excellence in Child Trauma C.I.C specialising in public relations.
Russ set up Breathe Leadership & Business Coaching in 2020 as a result of adopting and becoming a parent to two boys in 2019. He was then inspired to specialise in Therapeutic Parenting to support families navigating the challenges of early childhood trauma.
Natalie is a Certified Havening Practitioner & Trainer. She has a background as a Counsellor working with trauma, using Havening techniques, CBT, TA & NLP. Natalie is also an adopted child.
Contributor - Amanda Meusz
Amanda is a family barrister at Garden Court chambers, she is a passionate advocate for the rights of children and the most vulnerable parents in society. Amanda has developed a trauma informed approach to her work along with some innovative practices to assist the most vulnerable clients in negotiating proceedings and the aftermath of proceedings. She is a mentor and champion for Lawyers Who Care. ISSUE 18
Sair (Sarah) is a Therapeutic Parent, Author, Parent Coach and Havening practitioner. Sair is also co-founder and Director of Training, Qualifications & Quality at The Centre of Excellence in Child Trauma C.I.C
Jessica is a therapeutic social worker with over 20 years of experience helping adoptive parents navigate their parenting journeys using the attachment-based, trauma-informed parenting approach of TBRI®.
Sarah is a Therapeutic Parent, an Attachment Therapist, Keynote speaker, former child in care, Author (Therapeutic Parenting) Head of Therapeutic Services (Fostering).
Lucy is a barrister at East Anglian Chambers specialising in family and civil law. Lucy is also co-founder and trustee of Lawyers Who Care, the UK's first and only charity to support careexperienced aspiring lawyers. Lucy is care-experienced herself and a committed advocate to break down barriers for her community.
Contributor -AJ Gajjar
AJ is a Parenting and Trauma Consultant, child development specialist, and children's advocate. She supports professionals within the domestic violence, family law, children's mental health and child protection sectors to recognise the detrimental effects of domestic violence, highconflict divorce and maladaptive parenting on children.
T.I.P'S MAGAZINE
1
TRAUMA-INFORMED PARENTS
CONTENTS 4 COECT survey: Are family courts fit for purpose?
7 Developing a TraumaInformed practice in the family courts
14 Birth Family Visits: The importance of using Trauma-Informed Language
3 Editor's Note 11 Parenting Through the Pushback: Building Trust in the Teen Years 15 Supporting Families: Insight into Level 3 Coaching Qualification 16 Family Court and the need for Trauma-informed Practice 18-19 UPCOMING EVENTS CoECT Training, Workshops & Events Schedule 2025/2026 20 Creating Calm: How Havening Techniques® Support Parents and Professionals Facing Compassion Fatigue 22 Ask the Experts: Tis the Season to …. Dysregulate
ISSUE 18
T.I.P'S MAGAZINE
2
From its beginnings as a Therapeutic Parenting Group on Facebook a decade ago, we have evolved into a Community Interest Company dedicated to supporting parents of children who have faced early life trauma and display neurodiverse charachteristics. This edition focuses on the need for trauma-informed practice in family court.
Editor’s Note
Welcome Everyone, In this November edition of TIPS magazine, we explore the important theme of family courts, emphasising the necessity for trauma-informed knowledge and practices within the court system. In this edition, we present our COECT report on family courts, along with findings from a survey of 166 individuals with direct experience of the UK family court system. Respondents include carers, guardians, and professionals involved in child protection. Our aim was to assess whether family courts are fulfilling their core purpose: safeguarding the welfare of children in care and custody proceedings. We are excited to feature Lucy Barnes and Amanda Meusz from Lawyers Who Care, who have contributed an article on developing trauma-informed practices in family courts. Jessica, our resident contributor, discusses Therapeutic Parenting and Trust-Based Relational Intervention in her piece, "Parenting Through the Pushback: Building Trust in the Teen Years." We are also joined by Lisa Aldous who writes about her experiences in becoming Therapeutic Parent Coach. Sarah Dillon provides valuable insights in her article titled "Birth Family Visits: The Importance of Using Trauma-Informed Language in Family Courts and Social Care." AJ Gazzar emphasises the necessity of implementing trauma-informed practices in family courts, particularly regarding coparenting. Also, we welcome Natalie Freeman, who contributes with her article, "Creating Calm: How Havening Techniques® Support Parents and Professionals Dealing with Compassion Fatigue." As we approach December, we are excited to welcome Parent Coach Russ Hartland-Shaw for a . festive season special of Ask the Experts.
We would like to take this opportunity to thank all the contributors who have written articles for us this year. We also extend our gratitude to all of the families and supporting professionals within the CoECT community, with whom we support and work with. Wishing you all a peaceful festive season and a wonderful start to the New Year! Warmest wishes Sair, Sarah & The Team at The Centre of Excellence in Child Trauma C.I.C ISSUE 18
Sair Penna Executive Editor
Kathryn Talbot Managing Editor
TIPs Magazine T.I.P'S MAGAZINE
3
Are family courts fit for purpose? (CoECT 2025) Introduction This report presents findings from a survey of 166 individuals with direct experience in the UK family court system. Respondents include carers, guardians, and professionals involved in child protection. The aim is to assess whether family courts are fulfilling their core purpose: safeguarding the welfare of children in care and custody proceedings. The survey responses reveal systemic issues that raise serious concerns about the effectiveness, fairness, and child-centredness of current family court practices.
Methodology Sample Size: 166 respondents Respondent Profile: Carers, Guardians, Child Protection Professionals Data Collection: Anonymous survey with open-ended and thematic questions Focus Areas: Judicial decision-making, child trauma awareness, contact orders, reunification practices, role of social services, and overall system satisfaction
Key Findings 1. Judicial Understanding of Child Trauma A significant number of respondents reported that judges lacked adequate understanding of child trauma and its long-term effects. Supporting Professionals, including CAFCASS officers, were also perceived to have insufficient awareness of trauma-informed practice. This knowledge gap was seen to contribute to decisions that failed to protect children’s emotional and psychological wellbeing. ISSUE 18
T.I.P'S MAGAZINE
4
2. Prioritisation of Parental Rights Over Child Welfare Many respondents felt that courts placed greater emphasis on parental rights than on the best interests of the child. This prioritisation often led to decisions that were considered risky or harmful, particularly in cases involving known abuse or neglect.
3. Harmful Contact Orders Numerous cases were cited where courts enforced contact between children and abusive birth parents. Reported consequences include Emotional withdrawal and distress Repeated exposure to emotional, physical, and sexual abuse Respondents expressed concern that such orders ignored professional safeguarding advice.
4. Unsafe Reunifications Respondents detailed cases where children were returned to unsafe environments, leading to: Recurrence of neglect or abuse Emergency re-removals within months Long-term psychological damage, such as trauma from witnessing parental breakdowns
ISSUE 18
T.I.P'S MAGAZINE
5
5. Role of Social Services In the survey Social services were frequently criticised for: Failing to oppose harmful court decisions Prioritising procedural compliance over child welfare Ignoring or downplaying concerns raised by professionals Respondents felt that social workers were constrained by bureaucracy and lacked the authority to challenge judicial decisions effectively.
“Neglect and abuse happened within 4 months of return.”
“Returned at 5 months, back into care at 9 months.”
6. Systemic Dissatisfaction The family court system was widely described as: Biased and ineffective Traumatic and disempowering for children Emotionally exhausting for carers and professionals Children’s voices were reportedly ignored or marginalised in proceedings. Carers expressed burnout and disillusionment with the child protection system as a whole.
“Neglect and abuse happened within 4 months of return.”
“As long as they tick the box – that's all that matters.”
Conclusion & Recommendations The survey findings strongly suggest that UK family courts are failing to fulfil their fundamental purpose: protecting children. Systemic flaws—including inadequate trauma awareness, prioritisation of parental rights, and ineffective social services—are contributing to decisions that may endanger vulnerable children. To restore trust and ensure child protection remains central to family court decisions, the following reforms are urgently needed: Mandatory trauma-informed training for judges, guardians, and social workers Child-centric decision-making frameworks that prioritise safety and wellbeing over parental entitlement Independent oversight mechanisms to review and challenge harmful court orders Enhanced support for carers and professionals, including mental health resources and legal advocacy Procedural reforms to ensure children’s voices are heard and respected in all proceedings
Recent Reforms Recent reforms in October 2025 signal a significant change in the UK’s family court system, particularly the removal of the “presumption of parental involvement” when a parent poses a risk, prioritising child safety. Increased transparency and a focus on non-court resolutions reflect awareness of systemic issues. While these changes are promising, effective implementation and further reforms are essential to ensure all family court decisions prioritise children's wellbeing and protection. ISSUE 18
T.I.P'S MAGAZINE
6
Developing a trauma-informed practice in the family courts Written By Lucy Barnes & Amanda Meusz “Entering the trauma factory” Dr Judith Herman a Harvard Medical school psychiatrist opined in 2003 “ If one set out intentionally to design a system for provoking symptoms of posttraumatic disorder, it might look very much like a court of law." Similarly, Oliver Conway, solicitor in family law, referred to the family courts as a “trauma-factory” in an article for the Legal Action Group.[1] It would make sense, then, if practitioners had mandatory training in trauma. Unfortunately, however, according to Dr Catherine O’Neil’s research, whilst 65.2% of barristers have experienced secondary or vicarious trauma, 91.3% have not attended trauma-informed training. Trauma informed representation in family proceedings is an idea that is gaining traction especially when considering representation for survivors of domestic abuse. The Harm Report published in 2000 highlighted the additional trauma experienced, as a result of involvement in the family justice by survivors of domestic abuse and their children. In September 2023 Safe Lives produced a report outlining the transformative impact of domestic abuse training for family lawyers. In January 2025 the Family Justice Council issued guidance on Neurodiversity in the Family Justice System for Practitioners. Increasing thought is now being given as to how trauma impacts on the ability to participate in the family justice system, including the impact of trauma on communication. Amanda Meusz and Lucy Barnes, co founder of Lawyers Who Care have, through various training programmes, been highlighting the impact of trauma in the family justice system and in particular how this applies to care experienced people.
ISSUE 18
Care experience is a broad and inclusive term encapsulating the experiences of individuals who have experience of the children's social care system. This includes foster care, residential care, supervision orders and adoption. Given the main reasons why children and young people go into care, namely domestic abuse, family dysfunction or neglect (64% - ONS Data[1] ), the experience of trauma goes hand-in-hand with care experience. This is why Lucy Barnes asserts that developing a traumainformed practice for careexperienced people is not just desirable, but essential. If we are not both Care Aware and TraumaInformed, how can we tell stories of care experienced lives in court? In the family courts, there remains a lack of understanding of what we mean by trauma? The word is so often used in everyday speech that its meaning can become confused or diluted. When talking about trauma we do not mean the impact of the everyday stressors of life nor do we necessarily mean the impact of a catastrophic event, what some label as Big T trauma, causing PTSD (although it may be this). Many of the clients we represent will be care experienced or will have been on a child in need plan, on the edge of care or will have experienced complex and traumatic childhoods. Although there is no formal data, anecdotal evidence suggests that
they will have experienced four or more Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and further trauma in adulthood. The prolonged exposure to traumatic events will in many cases cause individuals to develop Complex PTSD. It is not just in the mind, it’s in the body. Trauma is an adaptive response to a threat, which causes the individual to react ‘on the arousal continuum from vigilance through to terror’ (Perry 2002). It is about the triggering of fear systems which are activated and continue even though the event has passed. Traumatised people are affected by related signals in their environment and extreme trauma can induce a sense of detachment from reality and dissociation as a primary adaptive response. Gabor Mate describes trauma as an inner injury lodged in the nervous system, mind and body lasting long after the originating incident(s). Dr Bessel Van der Kolk (Founder of the Trauma Research Foundation and author of The Body Keeps the Score) tells us that “Trauma is not the story of what happened back then. It is the current imprint of that pain, horror and fear living inside people.” What we see clearly in the family courts is that imprint is a very visceral trigger for our clients and practitioners are not always aware of the specific triggers. T.I.P'S MAGAZINE
7
Neuro-imaging can show us the changes in the brain’s structure of those who have suffered trauma, with shrinkage to the cortex (thinking brain) and corpus callosum, and an enlarged and more reactive amygdala (fight, flight, freeze, fawn response). It has been described as mild brain damage. Higher levels of reactivity within the brain of individuals with PTSD and C-PTSD is often observed. The sympathetic nervous system (stress system) is supercharged but the parasympathetic (rest and digest) system may not be fully engaged. Rest itself to some who have experienced trauma can even be triggering. Prolonged exposure to high stress chemical, or cortisol, levels creates reactivity stress. There is a wealth of evidence as to the impact on the long term physical and mental health of exposure trauma. The point that we are making is trauma lives within the individual and have ongoing physiological impact. Trauma is not something an individual can think their way out of. It is stored in their bodies. Some people with a history of trauma often cannot put into words their emotional feelings and frequently have difficulty sensing what is going on in their bodies. They can react to stress in ways that will affect their evidence. It is important to understand that traumatic experiences can sensitise limbic reactivity such that even minor stressors can provoke a trauma response, or a fight, flight, freeze or faint response. In this state the brain is in survival mode and the “thinking brain” is no longer engaged. In this state answers to questions whether in court or during a meeting with professionals are unlikely to be reliable. Time and time again clients report, after meeting with professionals to undertake assessments and after giving evidence that they have not said what they meant to say, they have been misunderstood or sometimes they have given answers just to make the process of questioning stop. They will say yes in a state of fawn or look calm and cool, because their bodies are stuck in a dissociative state. Or they will go quick to anger because their brain tells them “fight, now!” This is not ISSUE 18
Photo: ©COECT via Canva
necessarily a response that they have any control over, it is important therefore to be aware of the possibility that trauma responses are impacting on participation. Fully understanding trauma in the family courts: towards traumainformed justice An understanding of what is happening physiologically (i.e. in the body) when the individual is in this survival mode is helpful in the family courts. The part of the brain that is activated to help survival is different to the part of the brain that is activated when an individual is calm. In a survival state the individual cannot think clearly, they will not feel safe and participation in proceedings will be compromised. In a state of hyper arousal (fight/flight) the heart rate and breathing will be faster, blood pressure will be rising, muscles will be tensing in preparation for the fight flight. In a hypo aroused (freeze/faint) state again the heart rate and breathing will be faster, blood pressure will be rising, muscles will be tensing but the brain will be slowing down. In survival state the outside appearance may seem very different to what is happening internally. The client’s presentation may be mistaken as aggression, or disinterest. Faint mode is a state of complete surrender in which the
individual is not able to fight, flee or freeze, the heart rate and breathing will slow, typically a person may seem disinterested and will give answers in an attempt to please the questioner and stop the process. Professionals working with clients who have experienced trauma should be aware of the need for an individual to remain within their window of tolerance that is not in a hyper or hypo aroused state. There is still limited awareness of the Window of Tolerance and within the system and what this means in practice. Sadly, many individuals report to being traumatised by their own representatives, of not feeling heard or believed, of being asked questions in a way that triggers distress and traumatic memories. In order to avoid these outcomes it is helpful to explain clearly what the purpose of a meeting or court hearing is and what areas will need to be covered (and, what Lucy echoes, what a barrister is!). Small changes to our practice can signal safety in the brains of our clients. We can offer choice as to where the client would like to begin, do not expect to be given a linear account of events as traumatic memories are often stored as fragments (behaviour, emotions, sensation and thoughts) Offer breaks, and make sure that you have read the background material so that a client does not have to repeat T.I.P'S MAGAZINE
8
what is likely to be a painful narrative/ history. A common complaint from clients is that they have to repeat their stories to many different people, this is retraumatising. Trauma can cut an individual off from language, it is important to take time and forge a trusting relationship. If this is established experience shows that it will be easier to obtain instructions, and will reduce clients avoiding contact, what we so often call “non engagement”. In court there will not be time nor would it be appropriate to build rapport so the risk of retraumatisation increases as questions are asked. It is important to set clear ground rules so that advocates and the court is aware of the risk of retraumatisation the risk of a trauma response and how to assist regulation. The preparation of “one page profiles” or ‘about me’ documents, created by Amanda Meusz, setting out a pen portrait of the client, matters that are important to them, identifying their triggers, how to spot if a client is moving outside his or her zone of tolerance and what to do to help regulate them can be a really helpful tool. This document can be made available to all professionals involved in the case throughout proceedings. If used properly other professionals can avoid triggering a trauma response which will enable better engagement. Understanding what is happening physiologically helps us as practitioners move from being trauma aware to trauma informed. Understanding that trauma responses are not voluntary, are outside a client’s control, helps practitioners make appropriate adaptations in our approach to representation. Bespoke participation directions, over and above taking regular breaks, can be sought with the aim of providing real assistance to participation and regulation. Practitioners should acquaint themselves with the Advocates Gateway Toolkits in particular but not limited to Toolkit 10 which deals with the identification of vulnerability and Toolkit 13 which relates to vulnerability in the family courts and the extensive legislative framework which deals with vulnerability. ISSUE 18
Consideration should be given to the need for an intermediary assessment as trauma can have a profound impact on communication, as well as the assistance of specialist advocates, Independent Domestic Violence Advisers (IDVA) and Independent Sexual Violence Advisers (ISVA). The Family Bar Association provides excellent vulnerable witness training which is relevant to all practitioners not just those who regularly represent vulnerable clients, it could be argued that training is even more important for those who regularly cross examine the vulnerable. Towards Care Aware and TraumaInformed Justice
experience and trauma. Many commented that it was not just a better understanding of their mentee, but useful for their wider practice. Lucy and Amanda designed the Trauma-Informed training together and their overall vision is this: we want to see a justice system that uses the Window of Tolerance in court. That understands when our clients’ ‘thinking brains’ are offline and pose barriers to fair representation. When our clients are seen and heard. The family courts do not have to be a trauma-factory, it can become a trauma responsive system. For that, we all need to work together.
Lawyers Who Care ensures mandatory Care Aware and TraumaInformed training for mentors: 84% of the lawyers who undertook our training said they were better equipped to understand both care
You can find out more about Lucy and Amanda’s work at Lawyers who Care by visiting their website https://www.lawyerswhocare.org/
References [1] https://www.lag.org.uk/article/216973/reflections-on-family-law-and-moreentering-the-trauma-factory [2] https://www.lag.org.uk/article/216973/reflections-on-family-law-and-moreentering-the-trauma-factory [3] https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/ socialcare/articles/whoarethechildrenenteringcareinengland/2022-11-04
Friday 28th - Sunday 30th November 2025 Sydney, Australia
2025 National Foster & Kinship Care Conference: Empowering Carers to Transform Lives We are thrilled to share that Sarah Naish will be speaking at the National Foster and Kinship Care Conference in Sydney, Australia, this November.
This marks Sarah's first speaking engagement in Australia, where she will share her expertise on supporting children affected by trauma. For more information about the conference and Adopt Change, please follow the link 2025 National Foster & Kinship Care Conference: Empowering Carers to Transform Lives https://www.adoptchange.org.au T.I.P'S MAGAZINE
9
Next cohort starts January 2026
Level 4 Diploma in Trauma-Informed Practice Become a certified Trauma-Informed Practitioner and deepen your ability to support healing and resilience.
✔️ Accredited Level 4 Qualification ✔️ Flexible Online Learning ✔️ Ideal for Social Workers, Family Support Workers, Therapists, & Educators, working with children who have experienced trauma. ✔️ Join our next cohort starting in January 2026 Learn more and register for enrolment by following the link www.coect.co.uk/level-4-qualification or by scanning the QR code:
Photo: ©JSpenceley
Parenting Through the Pushback: Building Trust in the Teen Years Written By Jessica Spenceley Conflict is a normal part of adolescence. Teens are wired to test boundaries, push for independence, and ask — in both spoken and unspoken ways — Who am I? Where do I belong? How much control do I have over my life? For adopted teens, these questions often carry an added layer of intensity. Their search for identity may bring the past back to the forefront in painful or confusing ways. Their push for autonomy can trigger deep fears of rejection or abandonment. And what looks like defiance may actually be your teen navigating the tension between staying connected to you and stretching toward their own independence. This is where Trust-Based Relational Intervention® (TBRI®) can make all the difference. TBRI is a trauma-informed parenting approach that gives you practical tools for navigating conflict without losing connection. Instead of focusing only on stopping unwanted behaviour, TBRI helps you look beneath the surface to understand what your teen’s actions are really communicating. Through its principles of connection, empowerment, and correction, TBRI helps you hold boundaries in ways that feel safe, respectful, and effective.
ISSUE 18
At its core, TBRI is about creating trust and healing, so even in the middle of conflict, your teen can experience that your relationship is steady, secure, and unbreakable. Connection The first step in managing conflict is always connection. Before tackling the issue itself, slow down and start with the relationship. A calm voice, a touch of humour, or even just sitting nearby lets your teen know that you are for them, not against them. This simple shift can begin to disarm the battle. Imagine your teen slamming their bedroom door after an argument about curfew. Instead of launching into another lecture, you wait a few minutes, then knock softly and ask if you can sit with them. You don’t bring up the curfew right away. Instead, you notice out loud, “I can see you’re really upset — that felt like a lot just now.” By being present and attuned, you communicate that the relationship matters more than winning the fight. This lowers defences and makes it possible to revisit the issue when everyone is calm. It also shows your kiddo that even when you disagree, they are still safe and loved.
Empowerment The next step is to have curiosity about your teen’s physical and sensory needs. A hungry, tired, or overstimulated teen is far less able to think clearly or cooperate. Meeting those needs first often eases the tension and reduces escalation. Picture this: It’s Sunday late afternoon, and your teen is refusing to start the homework that’s due tomorrow. Instead of assuming your teen is lazy or defiant, you pause and check in on what might be driving the resistance. You then realise that they haven’t eaten since breakfast, so it’s impossible to expect them to focus while running on empty. You offer them a snack first and suggest a short break before tackling the assignment. Meeting the physical need doesn’t remove the boundary – the homework still needs to be done – but it dramatically reduces the tension and makes cooperation possible. Correction TBRI helps you offer correction through guidance, not control. Boundaries are essential, but how T.I.P'S MAGAZINE
11
you hold them makes all the difference. Choices, collaborative problem-solving, and calm but firm follow-through communicate both respect and safety. Let’s say that your teen keeps ignoring the agreed time to hand in their phone at night. Rather than confiscating it for a week, you sit down together and acknowledge the struggle: “I know it’s hard to put your phone away — it feels like you’re missing out when your friends are still online.” Then you invite problem-solving: “We need a way for you to rest at night and still feel connected to your friends. Let’s figure out together how we can make this work.” By holding the boundary but working as a team, you show that correction isn’t about control but about building trust and responsibility. When Conflict Becomes Connection Conflict is a part of your teen’s journey toward independence. With TBRI, conflict doesn’t have to be a daily battlefield. Instead, it can become a place where trust grows deeper, where safety is reinforced, and where your teen learns that love doesn’t disappear in hard moments.
“What to do when nothing works”
Image: ©COECT via Canva
Because conflict isn’t the enemy. Disconnection is. And when you parent from a place of connection, even the hardest battles can become opportunities to build the trust that lasts.
Jessica is the founder of Nurtured Belonging, where she helps adoptive parents understand their child’s behaviour through a trauma-informed lens, build stronger connections, and support healing. To learn more about TBRI or connect with Jessica, visit https://nurturedbelonging.com/
Residential Childcare
This month, Sarah Naish and Sarah Dillon delivered the “What to Do When Nothing Works” workshop for staff from a Residential Children’s Home. They were joined by fellow COECT Trainer Gareth Thomas, and together they shared their knowledge and expertise with the delegates. The workshop provided practical tools, valuable insights, and heartfelt support for those working with children in care. If you’d like to learn more about the learning opportunities we offer to Residential Children’s Home staff, including our workshops and the upcoming launch of our Level 3 qualification for Residential Childcare, in 2026, please get in touch via info@coect.co.uk
ISSUE 18
Our next “What to do when nothing works” workshop is open to all parents, carers, and professionals and will be held on Tuesday 10 February 2026 10am to 3pm in Dursley, Gloucestershire. Secure your spot at https://tinyurl.com/4rcd5a44 or scan the QR code. T.I.P'S MAGAZINE
12
T.I.P.s ENJOYING TIPS MAGAZINE? Continue reading with a TIPs Magazine subscription You've reached the end of the free preview. If you've enjoyed this issue, you can get every issue of TIPs Magazine throughout the year.
DIGITAL — £15 per year 6 issues + full digital archive Read TIPs Magazine wherever you are, on your computer, tablet or phone. www.coect.co.uk/shop PRINT — £30 per year 6 printed issues delivered to your door Prefer a physical magazine? Subscribe to receive every issue throughout the year. www.coect.co.uk/shop
Looking for more support? TIPs Magazine is also included as part of TIPs Hub membership. Join the TIPs Hub for access to the magazine alongside our wider range of support, resources, learning and community. www.coect.co.uk/join
Keep reading. Keep connected. TIPs Magazine — £15 digital | £30 print TIPs Hub — magazine + support + resources + learning + community