Key data
Patient selection: Insights from the PROTAGORAS 2.0 study regarding adequate preoperative sizing and planning
Stefano Fazzini highlights key findings of the recently-published PROTAGORAS 2.0 study, concluding “aortic stent graft oversizing should be considered the most important parameter for optimal ChEVAR [chimney endovascular aneurysm repair] planning”. RECENTLY, THE CHEVAR procedure was included in the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 guidelines for the treatment of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (jAAA), as an alternative to fenestrated EVAR (FEVAR) in urgent settings and/or hostile anatomies (e.g. angulated aortic neck, narrow and calcified iliac access). Despite the tremendous evolution of ChEVAR in the last decade, in terms of important publications (such as PERICLES and PROTAGORAS) and worldwide spread, the gutter-related endoleak (type Ia endoleak) is still considered the Achilles’ heel of the technique by many authors. One of the reasons for this perception is the concerning results comparing ChEVAR with FEVAR, showing that the former has a higher rate of late type Ia endoleak. Some authors have suggested that new research should focus on improvements in the preoperative planning, in order to avoid significant divergent experiences with this approach. As a bailout and not-standardised procedure, ChEVAR cannot be compared with FEVAR in terms of preoperative planning, because many challenging anatomical aspects must be taken into account with ChEVAR. At the same time, physicians performing ChEVAR should be dealing with urgent cases and hostile anatomies. The new era of the ChEVAR technique, named ‘standardisation’, could be realised by easy/customised planning and an ideal chimney–graft combination. Most of the published data have been evaluated by in vitro experiences focusing on gutter-related endoleaks and chimney graft compression, which is supposed to influence flow profile and may induce a risk of stent thrombosis. To overcome the technical bias of in vitro
4
UC202113392EE
studies (silicon models with one standard chimney graft morphology), we decided to analyse a homogeneous cohort of patients with single/double chimney grafts involving only one device combination: the Medtronic Endurant stent graft combined with a balloon-expandable stent graft (Advanta V12, Getinge). This choice allowed us to evaluate many challenging anatomies, such as a hostile neck (reverse tapered, angulated) and access (narrowed and calcified). We performed a computed tomography angiography (CTA)-based evaluation of a 10-year Münster experience with ChEVAR. With PROTAGORAS 2.0 (European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular
We advise an oversizing of 30–40% to avoid persistent type Ia endoleaks and likewise to ensure chimney graft patency.” Surgery, article in press) for the first time, a single parallel graft combination was evaluated using late outcomes and CTA-based pre/postoperative imaging in order to identify significant predictors to optimise sizing and prevent persistent type Ia endoleaks and chimney grafts stenosis/ occlusion. A recommended new range for main graft sizing, a new composite parameter (L-OS), and the concept of lost neck are the main elements of novelty for ChEVAR planning. A central finding of this study was that a
main graft oversizing between 30 and 40% (Figure 1) was significantly associated with a freedom from type Ia endoleak-related reintervention, without compromising primary chimney graft patency. Wide necks (>29mm) were significantly related to type Ia endoleaks having a mean oversizing of less than 20%; inversely, narrow diameters (<20mm) were significantly related to chimney graft stenosis/occlusion caused by excessive oversizing of more than 50%. The mean diameter of sealing zone (three aortic cross-sections of total neck length) should be taken into consideration in order to select the aortic stent graft diameter (Figure 2). In contrast to the actual recommendations of 20–30%, the optimal main graft oversizing seems to be higher, at around 30%. In fact, oversizing of at least 30–35% should be used for single and double chimneys, respectively. Stefano Fazzini The turbulence of blood flow at the level of the gutters should induce a spontaneous resolution of flow, proportional to the length and inversely proportional to the gutter area. Despite this general belief, a total neck length >20mm could not guarantee the sealing of early and late endoleaks in this study, if the oversizing was not adequate. In the present analysis, oversizing was the only significant independent parameter to prevent late type Ia endoleak. The presence of infrarenal neck was the only factor preventing type Ia endoleaks; in the case of no infrarenal neck, an oversizing of more than 35% would be needed to minimise the risk of persistent gutters. Another novelty of our research was the presentation of a new composite parameter (L-OS: total neck length [mm] + oversizing [%]) in order to reflect more accurately the successful preoperative planning. It could be a useful tool for uncertain cases (the choice of stent graft sizing leading to a wide gap of oversizing, e.g. 32/36mm resulting in 23/38% oversizing for a neck diameter of 26mm) to find a compromise between a short neck and aggressive oversizing, single or double chimney grafts. An L-OS range of 55–65 was significantly related to freedom from persistent type Ia endoleak and primary chimney graft patency. Considering that we treated 86% of hostile necks, the higher ranges (OS>35 and L-OS>60) could be indicated for double January 2021
