Issuu

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 12 Issue: 02 | Feb 2025

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

Study of Steel Structure on Different Sloping Ground Vishal.B Swami, Shubham E. Chandgude Assistant Professor Department of Civil Engineering, D. Y. Patil International University, Maharashtra, India Assistant Professor Department of Civil Engineering, D. Y. Patil International University, Maharashtra, India ---------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------investigate the erect of different strengthening schemes and Abstract - India is fastest growing and developing county in also to stiffen or strengthen the building by changing the member properties and rerunning the analysis.

infrastructure and all other sector. Infrastructure development is major factor of any county, but for infrastructure development necessities of land is major factor. Due to rapid urbanization there is less availability of land in plain area hence utilization of land in mountain area and sloping area become mandatory. But land in mountainous area is become major problem in construction hence special analysis and care should be taken while constructing projects in this area. In this project we have considered different floor steel structure like G+10 and G+20 and done analysis with different sloping ground varying from 0, 5, 10 degree. For above structure analysis is done for story displacement

Armagan Korkamaz Armagan Korkamaz et al. evaluated the performance of frame structures for various load patterns and variety of natural periods by performing pushover and non-linear dynamic time history analysis. Pushover and non-linear time history analyses results are compared to choose the best load distribution for specific natural period for this type of frame structure. They concluded that the shear failure of the columns is experienced at the larger storey displacements and rectangular distribution always give the higher base shear-weight ratio comparing to other load distributions for the corresponding story displacement. The rectangular load distribution shows maximum seismic demands during the given earthquakes more reasonable than the other load distribution

Key Words: STAAD.Pro, Sloping Building, Step back, Bracing system, High rise Building

1.INTRODUCTION Due to increase in population and rapid urbanization, the scarcity of plain ground is happened. Since structures are constructed in hilly area. The construction of building in hilly area is not easy compared to building in plain ground. In some hilly regions of the world are more pronto seismic activity, In India, North and northeast part have large sloping grounds and construction of RC building is popular in sloping ground. Earthquake causes shaking of ground so building resting on slope will experience motion at its base. Even though the base of the building moves with ground. Roof has tendency to stay in original position. But since the walls and columns are connected toit, they drag the roof along with them. Earth quakes are the natural phenomenon which are caused by the release of large strain energy by the moving faults below the surface of the earth, which ultimately causes the shaking of the earth top surface in all possible directions with different amplitudes and intensities of lateral forces.

A.Meher Prasad A.Meher Prasad et al. (2004) studied the effect of infill stiffness on seismic performance ofmulti-storey RC framed buildings in India. Two typical existing buildings located in moderate seismic zones of India (as per IS: 1893-2002[1]) are identified. Features like plan irregularity and vertical irregularity (soft storey) are found in one of the buildings, while the other is fairly symmetric. Infill’s were modelled using the equivalent strut approach. Static analysis (for gravity and lateral loads), response spectrum analysis and non-linear pushover analysis werePerformed. It is observed that the seismic demand at the soft storey level is significantly large when infill stiffness is considered, with larger base shear and larger displacements. A.Fiore et al. (2012) A.Fiore et al. (2012) studied about the inuence of infilll panels over the collapse mechanisms activated under pushover analysis. a large number of research studies have been recently devoted to the modelling and analysis of inflled RC framed buildings under seismic actions, and the significant role that the infill plays in the overall structural performance is by now a well acknowledged result. In particular, the extension of N2 method to infilled frame allows the appraisal of this contribution within the framework of a nonlinear static analysis. Numerical analyses were performed by using spatial models, both for the bare frames and in filledframes, in order to appraise the variation

1.1 LITERATURE REVIEW Ashraf. (1998) Ashraf et al. (1998) presents the steps used in performing a pushover analysis of a simple three-dimensional building. SAP2000, a state-of the-art, general purpose, threedimensional structural analysis program, is used as a tool for performing the pushover. It allows quick and easy implementation of the pushover procedures described in the ATC-40 and FEMA-273 documents for both two and threedimensional buildings. He suggested that it is easy to

Impact Factor value: 8.315

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

Page 34