Foster City Parks Master Plan

OUR PARKS, OUR FUTURE

DECEMBER 2025

Acknowledgments

CITY COUNCIL

Art Kiesel, Mayor

Suzy Niederhofer, Vice Mayor

Stacy Jimenez, Councilmember

Patrick Sullivan, Councilmember

Phoebe Venkat, Councilmember

CITY STAFF

Derek Schweigart, Director of Parks and Recreation

Frank Fanara, Parks Maintenance Manager

Tiffany Oren, Recreation Manager

Estelle Gobrera, Management Analyst

Austin Walsh, Communications Manager

PARKS & RECREATION COMMITTEE

Fred Baer

Eric Corpuz

Raj Tiwari

Doris Duncan

Lisa Fong

Sirish Bindal

Yvonne Ryzak

TASK FORCE

Latisa Brooks

Jeff Brown

TJ Consunji

Eric Corpuz

Tracy Delmonico

Tamra Donovan

Pam Frisella

Kenneth Huo

Ravi Jagtiani

Isha Misra

Steve Okamoto

Meilin Rife

Yvonne Ryzak

David Saito

Michael Terner

Jason Tran

Emmie Yang

CONSULTANTS

PROS Consulting

ETC Institute

Mack5

RMA Irrigation

Executive Summary | 06

Why Do a Parks Master Plan? About this Plan

The Planning Process Guidelines for the Future Key Outcomes

Our Community Today | 14

Community Context

Building on Other Plans

Parks and Recreation System Overview

Our Recreation Needs | 38

The Needs Assessment Process

Existing Conditions Analysis

Community Engagement

Guiding Themes

Our Vision | 74

Guidelines, Objectives & Actions

Park Standards

Park-Specific Recommendations

Realizing Our Vision | 140

Implementing Park Improvements

Implementing System-Wide Recommendations

Funding Call to Action

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Introduction

WHY DO A PARKS MASTER PLAN?

A vibrant parks and recreation system is a cornerstone of a city’s quality of life. Parks promote active living, strengthen community bonds, and reflect a city’s unique character. Anchored by its lagoon and waterfront setting, Foster City offers a diverse array of park facilities and recreational programs that enhance residents’ health, well-being, and cultural enrichment. Looking ahead, the continued improvement and expansion of these spaces and programs will be essential to ensuring Foster City remains a distinctive and vibrant place to live.

The Parks Master Plan establishes a vision for the City’s park and recreation system based on an assessment of existing assets and an understanding of community needs and priorities. It establishes goals and strategies to meet needs and provides a road map for implementation.

Rooted in the community’s vision, the recommendations in this plan will guide the City toward a vibrant and sustainable recreational landscape for generations to come.

NAVIGATING THIS PLAN

The Foster City Parks Master Plan weaves together a strategic approach encompassing system-wide considerations and site-specific nuances. The plan seeks to foster collaboration and alignment among stakeholders through an easy-to-understand framework, as follows:

Executive Summary

Chapter 1 introduces the Parks Master Plan and highlights its key findings and recommendations.

Our Community Today

Foster City has a unique park and recreation system set within a scenic waterfront environment. Chapter 2 gives an overview of the City’s parks and recreation facilities and programs and provides important demographic, historical, and policy context.

Our Recreation Needs

As the City evolves, its parks and recreation system must evolve as well. Chapter 3 describes community need based on existing conditions and community engagement.

Our Vision

Through strategic investments, Foster City parks and programs can more effectively serve the community. Chapter 4 proposes strategic recommendations that will guide Foster City’s park system into the future.

Realizing Our Vision

Implementing the Parks Master Plan requires a multi-faceted approach. Chapter 5 details implementation costs and identifies an approach to prioritization and funding to help translate the City’s vision into reality.

THE PLANNING PROCESS

The City of Foster City, its consultant team and Task Force developed the Parks Master Plan over a 16-month period. As shown in Figure 1.1, the process began in Summer 2024 and culminated with the Plan’s adoption in December 2025. The process included extensive public engagement, which is described in detail in Chapter 3: Our Recreation Needs .

Pop-up events at the initial stages of the process engaged residents about what they would like to see in their parks.

FIGURE 1.1 | Planning Process Timeline

GUIDELINES FOR THE FUTURE

The following guidelines serve as the foundation for the Parks Master Plan and are essential for realizing the community’s vision. The policies and actions supporting each guideline can be found in Chapter 4: Our Vision

1

Foster City’s parks and recreation system is vibrant, comfortable and responsive.

2 3

Foster City has a connected and accessible parks and recreation system.

The Lagoon and bay are active and well-integrated within the community.

4 5 6

Foster City has lively and inclusive events and programs.

Foster City’s parks and programs are environmentally sustainable.

Operational efficiency and economic feasibility are core to park and recreation management in Foster City.

KEY OUTCOMES

These key outcomes reflect the core themes and priority actions identified throughout the Master Plan and represent the most impactful strategies to advance Foster City’s parks, programs, and waterfront assets over the coming decades.

1. Expanded Park Experiences

The City will breathe new life into parks with engaging amenities for residents of all ages and abilities.

• Expand inclusive and nature-based play, including all-abilities playgrounds at Boothbay and Leo J. Ryan parks.

• Upgrade picnic and gathering areas, with enhanced reservable sites at Boothbay, Catamaran, and Port Royal parks.

• Add walking loops and paths at key parks such as Edgewater, Sea Cloud, and Boothbay parks.

2. More Shade and Park Comfort

Parks will have improved comfort features that encourage longer visits and support a wider range of activities.

• Increase shade through tree planting and shade structures.

• Provide more seating, rest nodes, and social spaces.

• Improve restrooms, lighting, fountains, and everyday conveniences.

3. Waterfront Improvements and LagoonAdjacent Parks

Foster City’s identity as a waterfront community will be strengthened through expanded opportunities to connect with the Lagoon / Bay.

• Expand waterfront access through trails, seating, viewing areas, and docks.

Improving lagoon beach parks could unlock recreational and ecological value, and further strengthen Foster City’s identity as a waterfront community.

• Revitalize lagoon beach parks (Gull, Marlin, Erckenbrack) with habitat improvements, shade, seating, and playful water-edge experiences.

4. Conserve Water & Manage Wildlife

Park landscapes will be enhanced to conserve water, support biodiversity, and deter geese in key waterfront parks.

• Convert select non-active turf areas to drought-tolerant and native landscapes.

• Modernize irrigation systems.

• Use planting and site design to manage geese and protect beaches.

5. Improve Events & Leverage Cost Recovery

Foster City’s successful events, programs, and rental facilities will strengthen community life while supporting longterm financial sustainability.

• Support and enhance signature events like Fourth of July and Summer Days.

• Improve rentals and user experience for picnic areas, sports fields, and waterfront spaces.

• Align pricing and policies at high demand sites (Baywinds, Sea Cloud, Boothbay) to support cost recovery while prioritizing residents.

6. Restore Sea Cloud II

The undeveloped site next to Sea Cloud Park will be explored for potential enhancement as a signature nature and recreation destination.

• Study ecological conditions and explore opportunities for restoration, public access, and recreational experiences.

• Coordinate with lagoon dredge and longterm ecological needs.

OUR COMMUNITY TODAY

Community Context

This section provides insight into Foster City’s parks and recreation system and the City’s history, demographics, relevant plans and policies.

FOSTER CITY’S ORIGINS

Located on a peninsula in the San Francisco Bay, Foster City is a vibrant community with a distinctive history. Once marshland on the edge of the bay, it was developed in the 1960s from a master plan. The Lagoon was a defining feature, offering residents waterfront views and recreational opportunities while shaping Foster City’s identity as a water-oriented community.

At its incorporation in 1971, the City had nearly 10,000 residents; today, it is home to approximately 35,000 people. Major companies have also established a presence here, making Foster City not only a desirable residential community but a thriving regional business hub.

Baylands were filled to create the City we know today. Images from original Foster City Master Plan (1960).

The Foster City Master Plan envisioned a city shaped around a lagoon (top). The zoning for Foster City originally included a mix of residential and commercial uses, with parks, schools, and recreation occupying a large land area in the City (bottom).

CURRENT CHALLENGES

Foster City has a well-established parks and recreation system that is beloved by its residents. Yet, the system faces challenges that require thoughtful planning and management to ensure it continues to serve the community.

Climate Change & Sea Level Rise

Situated on former marshland along the San Francisco Bay, Foster City is vulnerable to sea level rise. In response, the City recently built a levee to provide protection while also upgrading the Levee Pedway—a key recreational feature highly valued by residents. Despite these efforts, rising groundwater and stormwater pose flooding risks in low-lying areas.

Water Conservation

Ongoing statewide drought conditions and climate change have increased the need for water conservation. Public landscapes represent a significant opportunity for water savings. Recent state policies encouraging the reduction of non-functional turf have prompted a shift toward more sustainable park landscaping, incorporating a diverse palette of drought-tolerant and low-maintenance plants.

Aging Infrastructure

Foster City’s parks were a core part of the City’s original master plan. Today, much of the park infrastructure is over 50 years old. While these spaces remain well-loved, many require upgrades to remain functional, safe, and relevant for current and future generations.

Foster City’s levee has provided critical protection against sea level rise, but challenges remain (top). The State has required public agencies to phase out water-intensive grass where it is not needed (bottom).

Wildlife Management

Foster City is home to a large population of Canada geese, which inhabit parks, open spaces, and the Lagoon. Their presence has contributed to water quality concerns and park maintenance challenges. Addressing this issue has been a priority for the City, which has developed and begun implementing a Canada Goose Adaptive Management Plan to mitigate impacts while balancing ecological considerations.

DEMOGRAPHICS

Demographic patterns offer insight into how parks and recreational resources can best serve the community.

Slow Population Growth

Foster City’s population is projected to grow modestly over the next 15 years, from 35,000 in 2024 to approximately 39,070 by 2040.1 This equates to an average increase of 375 residents per year. Given this steady but limited growth, Foster City’s parks resources can primarily be directed toward improving existing parks and facilities.

FIGURE 2.1 | Population Growth

Source: U.S. Census Bureau (2010, 2020). Decennial Census, Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI)

(1) City of Foster City Housing Element 2022, HE-14. URL: foster_city_he_rev_3.20.2024.pdf

Balanced Age Distribution

Foster City’s population is broadly distributed across all age groups, with the largest share (about one-third) in the 35–54 age range, followed by significant portions in both younger families (0–12 and 13–17) and older adults (55+). This balanced mix highlights the importance of maintaining a diverse parks and recreation system that serves all generations— such as play areas and youth programs for children, active recreation and sports for working-age adults, and walking paths, fitness, and social

FIGURE 2.2 | Population by Age Segment

spaces for older residents. The relatively even distribution reinforces the need for a wellrounded system that offers something for everyone.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau (2010, 2020). Decennial Census, Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI)

Diverse Community

Foster City has a majority Asian population that is expected to continue growing, alongside significant White and multiracial groups. This diversity underscores the importance of culturally inclusive parks and recreation programming—such as festivals, activities, and amenities—that celebrate the community’s many backgrounds while ensuring all residents feel welcome and represented in public spaces.

Since 2010, Foster City has grown more diverse and is projected to continue this trend well into the future.

FIGURE 2.3 | Race & Ethnicity Estimates & Projections

Source: U.S. Census Bureau (2010, 2020). Decennial Census, Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI)

RECREATION TRENDS

National recreation trends show how needs and demands may evolve in Foster City over time. The key trends most relevant to Foster City are highlighted below, with Figure 2.4 showing how participation in various recreational activities has shifted over the past five years.

• Activities like Pilates, yoga, rowing, and trail running show substantial positive trends, reflecting a sustained interest in health and wellness.

• Water-based sports, such as kayaking and canoeing, have seen notable gains.

• Tennis and, in particular, pickleball have experienced significant growth in recent years.

• Baseball continues to be well represented in our parks; however, the sport is experiencing relatively slow growth nationwide.

• Swimming and aquatic exercise maintain steady participation, suggesting continued relevance for multi-generational users.

FIGURE 2.4 | National Recreation Trends

Source: Sports & Fitness Industry Association’s (SFIA), National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA), and Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI).

BUILDING ON OTHER PLANS

Integrating Foster City’s previous planning efforts ensures the parks and recreation system aligns with broader community goals. This Master Plan builds on and advances adopted strategies to support a cohesive citywide vision. An overview of related efforts follows:

Foster City General Plan

The Parks and Open Space Element of the General Plan establishes a citywide vision and high-level framework to guide the planning, development, and stewardship of Foster City’s parks, recreational facilities, and open space resources. This Master Plan was developed alongside the most recent Open Space and Conservation Element update, allowing for strong alignment and integration.

The General Plan’s other elements are also applicable to the Parks Master Plan , including the Conservation Element which proposes sustainability policies related to climate resilience and habitat restoration, and the Safety Element, which protects and preserves natural features such as wetlands that serve as natural mitigation against the impacts of flooding.

Canada Goose Adaptive Management Plan

Adopted in 2024, the Canada Goose Adaptive Management Plan proposes mitigation and management techniques to address the increasing goose population in Foster City. The presence of geese significantly impacts the overall recreational experience at Foster City parks, and successful management of goose populations will likely continue to be a

key objective for the City for years to come. The Parks Master Plan considers how these mitigation techniques can be integrated while minimizing impacts on park user experience.

Lagoon Management Plan

The Foster City Lagoon is a unique recreational asset and is vital to the City’s identity. Updated in July 2022, the Lagoon Management Plan guides the management and operation of the Lagoon, while reducing reliance on chemicals to treat the Lagoon’s waters. Managing lagoon water quality is essential to preserving—and potentially restoring—it as a valued recreational asset.

Leo J. Ryan Park Waterfront Master Plan

The Leo J. Ryan Park Waterfront Master Plan outlines a vision for re-imagining and activating the park’s edge along the Lagoon. Completed in 2024, the plan introduces activation concepts such as a boardwalk overlook, watercraft dock, and water terraces. The proposed concepts reflect public input, with many respondents expressing a desire for places to walk, sit, enjoy views of the water, and participate in water activities such as kayaking. The recommended improvements within the Parks Master Plan incorporate these key ideas for Leo J Ryan Park.

Park Accessibility Report

The report provides a detailed inventory of ADA compliance in Foster City parks with identified improvements and estimated costs to meet ADA standards. As of 2022, it would require $5.5 million to bring all City of Foster City parks to ADA standards. These accessibility issues should be taken into consideration when designing and implementing individual park improvements.

Age Friendly City Initiative

In 2020, Foster City applied to join AARP’s/ WHO’s network of Age-Friendly States and Communities. The application summarized existing and planned policies, programs, and services the City provides for its older residents. The City’s application was accepted by AARP/ WHO in December 2020 and the Action Plan was submitted in 2024. The strategies identified in the action plan are all related to the City’s recreational programming and services. The recommendations in this Master Plan aim to reinforce the identified projects to ensure Foster City can continue to be more age friendly.

Bike & Pedestrian Master Plan

The Bike & Pedestrian Master Plan , underway as of this writing, is the first of its kind in Foster City and will help make multi-modal transportation in Foster City safer, more convenient, and accessible for residents. The plan will identify new bike and pedestrian connections that expand recreation trail opportunities and improve access to parks and recreation facilities across the City.

PAST PARK PLANNING

Planning for Foster City’s parks began with the community’s conception and has continue since. The following are key park planning efforts which this Master Plan builds on.

1965 Recreation and Parks Master Plan:

This plan established the foundational park system framework: original concepts, sizes, functions, and the siting pattern that set today’s parks and school sites. It created the baseline classifications and service areas that later plans would refine.

1968 Master Plan for Recreation & Parks: Prepared by Ellis, Arndt, & Truesdell, Inc, the 1968 Plan builds on the work of the 1965 plan, converting its framework into more actionable guidance with clearer programming, design direction, and early phasing/costing for a growing city. It largely confirmed the park system while tightening standards and implementation steps based on early experience.

1990 Parks & Recreation Master Plan:

This plan shifted emphasis from system build-out to reinvestment—renovations, accessibility, lifecycle replacement, and evolving recreation needs in a maturing community. It built on earlier plans by prioritizing upgrades, joint use with schools, and practical funding/operations strategies.

2019 Assessment: The 2019 assessment took inventory of existing parks and open spaces in Foster City. The assessment covered availability of park amenities, park accessibility, existing recreation facilities and recreation programs.

Parks & Recreation System

As shown in Figure 2.5 and detailed in Table 2.1, Foster City has an expansive parks and recreation system that includes 24 parks, three community centers, the 8-mile Levee Pedway trail, and local pathways that connect neighborhoods and enhance opportunities for walking, jogging, and biking. The following section provides a more detailed overview of Foster City’s park and recreation system.

LEGEND

City

Beyond its parks, Foster City features a range of non-park spaces for recreation, including trails and pathways (top) and water bodies such as the Lagoon (bottom).

PARKS

Foster City has 113 acres of public parkland featuring a wide array of amenities. The system is anchored by four large community parks – Leo J. Ryan Park, Sea Cloud Park, Boothbay Park, and Edgewater Park – which offer sports fields and courts, playgrounds, group picnic areas, and other special amenities that attract diverse users from across the community.

In addition, Foster City is home to a network of smaller neighborhood and mini parks nestled within residential areas. These parks provide everyday recreational opportunities and are designed to meet the specific needs of nearby residents. The City also includes three special-use parks dedicated to unique recreational activities, including windsurfing, boat launching, and dog play.

24 Parks 113 Acres

Foster City’s park system includes Lagoon-adjacent parks such as Boat/Dog (top) and the Levee Pedway, which runs past several parks (bottom).

INDOOR RECREATION FACILITIES

Foster City’s indoor recreation facilities serve as community gathering spaces and provide a wide range of activities that serve all demographic groups, including children, teens, and seniors. The facilities also provide spaces that can be rented by residents for birthday parties, meetings, and other special events.

New Community Center

Located within Leo J. Ryan Park, Foster City’s community center will offer expanded event space and more programmatic opportunities for Foster City residents. It will include dedicated spaces for seniors, early learning classroom/space, a ceramic studio, and fitness rooms. The new facility will also incorporate sustainable design strategies related to water efficiency, energy conservation, and waste management, achieving a minimum of LEED Silver 1 . The project is expected to be completed by Summer 2026.

Community Center Annex

Co-located with the Foster City Library, the Community Center Annex sits across Shell Boulevard from Leo J. Ryan Park. This space has four multipurpose rooms of various sizes used for community programming and available to rent for parties, meetings, classes, and more. Additionally, the building features an outdoor patio on the second floor and an outdoor garden facing Shell Boulevard.

The Vibe Teen Center

Located within Leo J. Ryan Park, the Vibe Teen Center features a multipurpose room, kitchen, patio, and game room, and functions as a hub for drop-in and after-school programs. In addition to youth programming, the Vibe Teen Center is also available for public rentals and serves as a gathering space for the broader community.

(1) Recreation Center Rebuild Project, City Council Presentation, September 2023. URL: https://www.fostercity.org/parksrec/project/recreation-center-rebuild-project-cip-301-678

JOINT USE FACILITIES

Multiple school facilities are available for City programming and are essential to meeting indoor recreation needs. The City maintains an agreement with the San Mateo-Foster City School District for joint use of the following facilities:

• Multi-purpose rooms at Foster City, Audubon, and Beach Park Elementary

• Gymnasium at Brewer Island Elementary

These facilities are available for the City to use after school, on weekends, and during school breaks. Looking ahead, the agreement could be strengthened to provide greater access.

PRIVATE PARKS & RECREATION FACILITIES

Foster City is home to a variety of private recreation facilities, including those provided by local homeowners’ associations (HOAs) and the Peninsula Jewish Community Center (PJCC). HOA facilities range from small playgrounds and sports courts to swimming pools, pathways, and trails. The PJCC offers expansive amenities such as fitness spaces, indoor and outdoor pools, group exercise studios, a gymnasium, sports courts, and programs including childcare, preschool, fitness classes, events, and outdoor recreation.

While these facilities play a role in meeting residents’ recreational needs, access is limited. HOA amenities are generally restricted to its members, and PJCC programs require membership, which can be cost-prohibitive for some households.

The City uses the multi-purpose room at Beach Park Elementary and has access to other multi-purpose rooms within the school district.

The Peninsula Jewish Community Center includes a lap-swimming pool and other recreation features.

OPEN SPACE & TRAILS

Foster City contains a diverse range of open spaces that offer both recreational and ecological value. In addition to parks, the City includes approximately 22 acres of publicly accessible open space along trails, as well as 41 acres of restricted-access open space, primarily along the Bay shore and Belmont Slough. The shoreline along Belmont Slough is part of the Redwood Shores Ecological Reserve, where the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) oversees habitat conservation and wildlife protection. Natural areas like the slough provide scenic trails and serve as important refuges for native species. Wrapping around the perimeter of Foster City’s waterfront edge is the Levee Pedway. This eight-mile multi-use pathway is a segment of the San Francisco Bay Trail, and serves as a recreational asset for walking, jogging, and biking. In addition to the Levee Pedway, three miles of neighborhood trails provide short local connections to the City’s schools, parks, and neighborhoods.

MARINERS POINT GOLF CENTER

Mariners Point Golf Center is a City-owned property that is leased to a private operator and offers a variety of golf amenities, including a driving range, short course, practice areas, and instruction programs. The facility provides an important outlet for golf in the community and attracts both local users and visitors. However, as a pay-to-play venue, recreational access is more limited compared to the City’s publicly available parks and open spaces.

THE LAGOON

The Foster City Lagoon is a major recreational and ecological feature and is central to the community’s identity. The Lagoon covers approximately 218 acres and winds through Foster City’s neighborhoods, fronting several of the City’s parks. Residents and visitors engage in water-based recreation on the Lagoon, including kayaking, paddling, and boating, and the Lagoon is central to many Foster City community events.

An abundant Canada Goose population has created maintenance and operations challenges for the City, and water quality concerns have discouraged recreational use of the Lagoon and its beaches over time.

THE BAY

Just as important, the San Francisco Bay creates an enhanced experience for people using the Levee Pedway and Bay-adjacent parks such as Baywinds, Gateshead, Shorebird, and Bridgeview. San Francisco Bay is the largest estuary on the West Coast, supporting a rich diversity of wildlife and plant species. It provides a critical habitat for migratory birds, fish nurseries, and endangered species such as the Ridgway’s rail and salt marsh harvest mouse. The Bay also offers a wide range of recreational opportunities, including kayaking, sailing, and birdwatching, making it a vital natural and cultural resource that connects communities to the region’s environmental heritage while promoting outdoor access and stewardship.

PROGRAMS & EVENTS

Programming and events are key elements of the Foster City parks and recreation system. The City offers a variety of programs and services that fall into the following core program areas:

• Afterschool Programs: Foster City offers a range of youth programs, such as the Wednesday Enrichment Program, a seasonal program that offers classes for 1st through 5th graders at Audubon, Beach Park, and Foster City Elementary Schools. The Vibe Teen Center also offers a drop-in afterschool program for kids 6th through 12th grade.

• Athletics: Sports play an important role in recreational life in Foster City. From pickleball to softball, there are opportunities for all ages to stay active through organized leagues and community-based competitions.

• Camps: Foster City offers seasonal camps for kids aged 4 to 13 during summer, fall, winter, and spring breaks. Activities include sports, arts and crafts, and group games. Camps are held at the Vibe Teen Center and other local recreation facilities and parks.

• Lifelong Learning and Wellness: Foster City offers year-round classes, supporting a range of interests from education to health and wellness that help residents stay active, engaged, and connected.

• Reservations and Rentals: Foster City’s recreation facilities offer a variety of rentable spaces for residents to host events, meetings, and parties. Eight parks feature reservable picnic areas and select park spaces are available for gatherings of all kinds. People can also reserve baseball diamonds and tennis courts for tournaments and competitions.

• Community Events: Foster City hosts a variety of community events throughout the year that offer opportunities for celebration, recreation, and connection for residents of all ages.

Many parks in Foster City offer spaces to play team sports, such as soccer, baseball, and pickleball.

COMMUNITY EVENTS IN FOSTER CITY

Fourth of July Celebration: Day-long community celebration with parades, games, live entertainment, and food; free admission.

Summer Concert Series: Free Friday evening concerts in July and August at the Leo J. Ryan Amphitheater.

Off the Grid Food Trucks: Seasonal food truck event offering diverse cuisine, live music, and a casual outdoor dining experience at Leo J. Ryan Park from April to October.

Family Overnighter: Overnight family camping at various parks with games, songs, and campfire activities; registration required.

Halloween Festival: Seasonal event with trickor-treating, costume and pumpkin contests for preschool–5th grade.

Holiday Tree Lighting: Annual tree lighting with music, crafts, refreshments, and visit from Santa; food donations encouraged.

Summer Days: Multi-day August festival with rides, music, food, beer tasting, car show, and rubber ducky races.

Community Bike Ride: Self-guided bike scavenger hunt along the Bay Trail for individuals and families; free participation.

Programs and events make Foster City parks come alive such as the Halloween festival (top) and the Fourth of July Celebration (bottom).

OUR RECREATION NEEDS

Understanding community needs is a critical step in parks master planning. A two-pronged approach was used, combining an analysis of existing conditions with robust community engagement, as shown in Figure 3.1. This chapter describes that approach and presents the parks and recreation needs identified during the process. These findings form the foundation for the recommendations in Chapter 4, which are intended to guide future investments and ensure the park system continues to meet the evolving needs of the community.

Existing Conditions

Existing Plans + Policies

Park Inventory + Assessment

Park System Mapping

Park Usage

Demographics + Recreation Demand

Maintenance + Operations

Recreation Programming

Level of Service

+

Community Engagement

Pop Ups Task Force

Focus Groups

Specific Park Feedback Survey

Statistically Valid Survey Workshops

NEEDS ASSESSMENT

Existing Conditions

PARK ASSESSMENT

The Park Assessment offers a thorough evaluation of the City’s parks, highlighting both their strengths and areas for improvement. In Summer 2024, each City park was evaluated using criteria organized into four categories: Access and Connectivity, Comfort and Safety, Functionality, and Condition.

Parks were scored on a 1–10 scale, with scores corresponding to the following qualitative ratings:

• Poor (0 – 4.0)

• Fair (4.1 – 6.0)

• Good (6.1 – 8.0)

• Great (8.1 – 10)

FIGURE 3.2 | Park Assessment Criteria

Access & Connectivity

• Edge permeability

• Signage, maps + city branding internal path connectivity

• Pedestrian connectivity to trails/ paths

• Safe pedestrian crossings

• Bicycle connectivity & amenities

• Parking

Comfort & Safety Functionality Condition

• Availability of shade

• Availability of comfort amenities

• Availability of restrooms

• Mitigation of views/noise from surrounding land uses

• No Signs of unauthorized activity

• Line of sight/ openness

• Presence and/or diversity of activities/ amenities

• Appropriate amenity adjacencies

• Diversity and appropriateness of vegetation

• Absence of visible drainage issues or erosion

• Compatibility with neighbors

• Paving condition

• Vegetation condition

• Tree canopy condition

• Playground condition

• Sports field condition

• Sports court condition

• Restroom facilities condition

• Comfort amenities condition

• Lighting condition

Figure 3.3 illustrates the overall score for each park, underscoring that Foster City has a highquality park system, though some targeted enhancements are needed to improve the user experience. Figure 3.4 highlights common strengths and challenges across the park system.

FIGURE 3.3 | Overall Park Assessment Scores

Leo J. Ryan Park

Sea Cloud Park

Boothbay Park

Edgewater Park

Port Royal Park

Catamaran Park

Shorebird Park

Erckenbrack Park

Gull Park

Farragut Park

Marlin Park

Ketch Park

Killdeer Park

Gateshead Park

Sunfish Park

Leo Park

Pompano Park

FIGURE 3.4 | Foster City Parks Strengths & Challenges

Diverse Activities in Large Parks

Large parks like Boothbay and Sea Cloud offer a variety of amenities.

Safe and Maintained Environments

Most parks are wellmaintained, with minimal vandalism or safety concerns.

Scenic Waterfront Locations

Parks like Leo J. Ryan and Marlin offer stunning views and access to the Lagoon.

STRENGTHS CHALLENGES

Lack

of Signage and Pathways

Parks like Edgewater and Pompano are harder to navigate due to unclear signage and limited pathways.

Limited Comfort Amenities

Many parks lack sufficient shade, seating, and lighting.

Cleanliness Issues

Waterfront parks, such as Marlin and Erckenbrack, are impacted by goose droppings.

Foster City parks are well maintained and offer a variety of amenities (top), but a lack of signage on pathways (bottom) remain issues.

PARK LEVEL OF SERVICE

Park acreage level of service (LOS) measures the availability of parks and recreational facilities relative to a community’s population, helping ensure equitable access and adequate resources. Foster City currently offers 3.2 acres of developed park land per 1,000 residents, which is higher than the average of similar local communities.

Given Foster City residents’ strong park access and general satisfaction with the overall amount of parkland, the Parks and Open Space Element of the Foster City General Plan recommends the City focus on maintaining its existing park acreage into the future, maintaining a minimum of 2.9 acres per 1,000 residents. Although the City is largely built out, there remain a few opportunities to expand parkland near Sea Cloud Park and Baywinds Park . While additional acreage is not necessary to meet the City’s level of service standard, the City may wish to pursue these opportunities to diversify recreation experiences, particularly through the addition of natural open space areas. These sites are further described on the following pages.

PARK

ACCESS

Walkable access to parks and open spaces is essential for promoting physical activity, fostering community interaction, and supporting overall well-being. As shown in Figure 3.5, all of Foster City’s residential neighborhoods are within a 10-minute walk of a park – an aspirational standard that many cities struggle to achieve. While there are portions of the City that are beyond a 10-minute walk from a park, these are primarily employment areas, including campuses with their own landscape amenities.

LEGEND

OPPORTUNITIES FOR ADDITIONAL PARKLAND

Sites adjacent to Sea Cloud and Baywinds parks present rare opportunities for expanded public parkland with both recreational and ecological benefits.

SEA CLOUD II

Sea Cloud II is a 21-acre City-owned open space between Sea Cloud Park and the San Francisco Bay Trail. Once ecologically rich marshland, the site was filled with dredged material during the creation and maintenance of the Foster City Lagoon and today includes areas of seasonal wetland supporting a mix of native and invasive vegetation, with protected bird species observed nesting. Despite its scenic value, the area is currently fenced off and inaccessible to the public. The site presents an opportunity to expand parkland, create new nature-based recreational experiences, and enhance wildlife habitat.

Due to the potential presence of wetland and sensitive habitat areas, further study is needed to assess the site’s ecological constraints and recreational potential, as well as its suitability for future dredge disposal from the Foster City Lagoon, which is scheduled for upcoming maintenance.

BAYWINDS PARK

Baywinds Park is a 1.3-acre City-owned park located along the northwestern edge of Foster City, popular for windsurfing and attracting visitors from across the region. The park sits adjacent to extensive wetlands, open space, and recreational assets, including the 25-acre Mariners Point Golf Center and approximately 25 acres of Caltrans-owned undeveloped land. Together, these sites present a unique opportunity to create a more integrated ecological and recreational destination. The Mariners Point Golf Center is a valued recreational amenity, currently leased by the City to a private operator. While the long-term vision for the site has yet to be determined, its future use could pose opportunities for additional parkland, restored natural habitat, or other recreational facilities. Similarly, the Caltrans parcels could offer similar opportunities through partnership or land acquisition.

AMENITY LEVEL OF SERVICE

Recreation amenity standards have been developed based on local and national trends tailored to Foster City’s unique needs. Table 3.1 applies these standards to the City’s projected population, revealing which amenities may be needed in the future. The analysis shows that Foster City offers a high level of service (LOS) for most major amenities—especially multiuse fields, tennis courts, basketball courts, and playgrounds. By 2040, however, meeting projected demand will require at least four pickleball courts, one volleyball court, and four reservable picnic shelters.

TABLE 3.1 | Amenity Level of Service Standards and Needs

This analysis focuses on traditional park amenities commonly tracked by the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA). However, it does not capture other important community needs, such as trails, shade trees, walking paths within parks, community gardens, and more, which were highlighted through community engagement (see Community Engagement section, starting on page 58).

(1) Average level of service for comparable Bay Area communities (Belmont, Burlingame, Menlo Park, Millbrae, San Bruno, San Carlos, San Mateo, South San Francisco). Source: PROS Consulting, 2024.

(2) For agencies serving communities of between 20,000 and 49,999 residents. Source: National Recreation and Park Association, 2024.

(3) Priority Investment Rating is an index score based on residents’ level of unmet need and level of importance for each amenity. Source: ETC Institute, 2024

PARK USE

Understanding how Foster City’s parks are used is essential for planning improvements that reflect community needs. Placer.ai data reveals visitation patterns—showing which parks are most popular, when they are most used, and who is visiting.1 The following section highlights key takeaways.

High visitation, particularly per square foot, highlights which parks are especially active and well loved. As shown in Figure 3.8 Boat/ Dog Park had the highest visits per square foot, followed by Baywinds Park and Leo J. Ryan Park. Boat/Dog and Baywinds are both special

use parks that attract active recreation users, such as kayakers and windsurfers. Leo J. Ryan Park far outnumbers other community parks with density of use, suggesting the range of amenities it offers vs other community parks. In neighborhood parks, Catamaran and Port Royal stood out for their high use—likely tied to their sports fields—while others like Farragut, Gull, and Shad saw relatively low activity. These patterns suggest opportunities to enhance underused spaces.

cellular data to reveal patterns about space usage, including time, length of stay, user origin, and other linked destinations.

Extending Use

Lighting and shade play a role in shaping park use patterns, both seasonally and throughout the day. Enhanced lighting can extend usability into evening hours while being designed to not disturb surrounding residential areas. Adding shade trees and structures could also improve comfort and attract more users during peak sunlight. These upgrades would promote greater year-round accessibility and enjoyment of City parks.

Understanding Park Users

Foster City’s parks should reflect the diversity of the community and the varying ways residents engage with outdoor spaces. Young adults and households with lower to moderate incomes appear to use parks frequently, while seniors, middle-aged adults, and Asian residents –who make up the City’s largest demographic group – appear less represented in park use3 . These patterns point to opportunities to broaden the appeal of Foster City’s parks by ensuring amenities remain affordable and accessible, offering culturally inclusive programs, improving language access, and enhancing park features that meet the needs of all residents.

Catering to Residents and Visitors

Foster City parks primarily cater to residents. However, parks like Baywinds Park and Leo J. Ryan Park attract significant nonresident visitation and have the potential for cost recovery opportunities through user or facility access fees, equipment rentals, or other strategies. Other parks with desirable recreation amenities, like Sea Cloud, may also have potential to be leveraged for more cost recovery.

(3) It should be noted that visitor demographic data is inferred based on a visitor’s census block group, providing insights into the demographic composition of neighborhoods rather than the specific traits of individual users.

MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS ASSESSMENT

The planning process included an assessment of how the City cares for its parks and open spaces, including staffing, service levels, and day-to-day challenges. An overview of the City’s maintenance practices and assessment findings follows. The department’s maintenance responsibilities encompass a wide range of tasks to ensure the safety, functionality, and aesthetic appeal of public spaces. Key areas of focus include:

Athletic Field Maintenance: Care for natural and synthetic turf fields with scheduled upkeep and recovery time to keep them in top condition.

Tree & Plant Care: Maintain healthy trees and plants in parks and public areas.

Playground & Equipment Upkeep: Inspect and repair playgrounds and equipment for safety and standards compliance.

Grounds Maintenance: Regular upkeep of lawns, gardens, and open areas for a clean, welcoming environment.

Facilities Maintenance: Keep recreation centers, pools, and other facilities safe and functional.

Trail Maintenance: Keep trails safe and enjoyable for walking, jogging, and biking.

Graffiti Removal: Quickly clean vandalism to maintain public spaces.

Storm Drain Management: Clear drains of debris to prevent flooding and protect pathways.

Irrigation: Maintain water systems to support healthy landscapes.

Foster City parks have amenities that need ongoing care, such as picnic tables (top), seating, trees, athletic facilities, and waste receptacles (bottom).

Maintenance Modes

The park system has three maintenance modes, each with its own standards that determine routine maintenance tasks and their frequency. The appropriate maintenance mode is assigned to each park or site, which creates a framework for organizing and scheduling tasks and responsibilities at each location.

Maintenance Mode 1: Parks that need the highest level of upkeep, often revenuegenerating sites like athletic fields where maintenance directly affects use and income.

Maintenance Mode 2: Parks that are heavily used and need a moderate level of upkeep, such as community parks, special use facilities, trails, and other popular amenities.

Maintenance Mode 3: Parks that need only basic upkeep, usually undeveloped sites with few or no amenities.

Athletic fields (top) require more attention to maintenance than green spaces in smaller parks (bottom).

Maintenance Challenges

Foster City’s parks and recreation facilities are generally in great condition due to strong maintenance practices. The Maintenance & Operations Assessment, however, highlighted a few challenges that affect departmental efficiency and maintenance outcomes.

• Lack of a Formal Maintenance Management Plan: While Foster City takes a high degree of care of its parks, the City does not have a fully documented plan for tracking work performance and outcomes by park.

• Underutilized GIS-Based Asset Management System: Without full implementation of such a system, the City’s ability to track maintenance needs, costs, and asset lifecycles is diminished.

• Underfunding of Maintenance Operations: Annual park maintenance funding is approximately $450,000 below the level needed to achieve optimal service based on best-practice benchmarks, including the equivalent of 2.5 full-time positions.

• Well-Equipped but Needs Continued Investment: The City currently has the necessary vehicles and equipment but must reinvest as the system grows to maintain service levels. Per state guidelines, all new small equipment must be electric.

PROGRAMS & SERVICES ASSESSMENT

The Foster City Parks and Recreation Department delivers a wide range of programs that promote community health, connection, and lifelong learning. Seven Core Program Areas— Active Aging, Afterschool, Athletics, Camps, Community Events, Lifelong Learning & Wellness, and Reservations/Rentals—reflect a balanced approach to serving residents of all ages, abilities, and interests. Together, these areas provide year-round opportunities for physical activity, creative expression, and community engagement.

Participation and satisfaction rates are strong: nearly half of Foster City households participate in programs annually, and 90% rate program quality as good or excellent both above national benchmarks. The most common barrier to participation is lack of awareness of available programs, suggesting a need for stronger, multi-channel outreach through the City’s Activity Guide, e-newsletters, and digital platforms (see Community Engagement section beginning on page 58).

Age Segmentation

As shown in Table 3.2 , each program area serves multiple age groups, ensuring broad accessibility and a balanced portfolio of services.

• Preschool and elementary-aged children are well served through camps, afterschool programs, and youth athletics.

• Teens and young adults primarily engage through athletics and enrichment programs, though this segment remains underrepresented.

• Adults are served primarily through select wellness and athletic programs, and community events. Adults represent the City’s largest age group, yet programming for them is limited, signaling the need for further evaluation of their interests and needs.

• Seniors are a dedicated focus of active aging programs, which support health, social connection, and lifelong learning.

This balance ensures opportunities across life stages, though continued focus on adult and senior engagement and schedule flexibility could strengthen overall participation.

Program Delivery and Organizational Capacity

Beyond program content, several operational findings influence the Department’s ability to deliver high-quality and financially sustainable services:

• Program Evaluation: Success is primarily measured by participation numbers rather than outcome-based metrics. Developing consistent evaluation tools would help assess impact and guide adjustments.

• Marketing and Outreach: While multiple communication channels exist, the Department lacks a formal marketing plan to target key audiences and promote awareness of program offerings.

• Staffing: Current staffing levels limit capacity to expand programming or improve evaluation and marketing efforts.

• Volunteers and Partnerships: The Department benefits from strong community relationships but lacks formalized policies governing volunteer engagement and partnership agreements.

• Customer Feedback : Ongoing surveys and feedback loops are limited. Expanding feedback collection would help track satisfaction and emerging needs.

Collectively, these findings suggest that Foster City’s programming framework is strong, but its support systems—evaluation, marketing, staffing, and partnerships—should evolve to sustain high-quality service delivery as demand grows.

AGES SERVED

COST OF SERVICE ASSESSMENT

The Foster City Parks and Recreation Department invests approximately $2.6 million annually to deliver recreation programs and services, achieving an overall cost recovery rate of about 56%. This balance reflects the City’s dual commitment to fiscal responsibility and community accessibility.

Current Cost Recovery Performance

Cost recovery varies significantly by program type, corresponding to each area’s mix of public versus individual benefit.

• Camps and Athletics are the strongest performers, achieving 116% and 81% recovery, respectively—driven by steady participation and efficient delivery.

• Afterschool Programs perform well at 68%, reflecting strong community demand and manageable staffing ratios.

• Active Aging Programs are intentionally subsidized, recovering about 30%, consistent with their public service mission.

• Community Events draw the largest audiences (over 57,000 annual visits) but recover only 21% of costs—appropriate given their essential community-building role.

• Lifelong Learning & Wellness programs show the greatest variation; while some classes exceed cost recovery goals, others have low enrollment or high delivery costs.

• Facility Rentals collectively recover 32%, with sport courts outperforming and indoor sports facilities, while fields and indoor rooms operate below target.

Overall, the Department’s financial performance reflects a well-balanced portfolio—combining revenue-generating programs that help offset costs with essential offerings that prioritize community benefit.

Community events in Foster City are popular, but only recover a fraction of costs compared to other programs.

Program Classification Framework

To interpret these results and guide future pricing, the Department classifies its programs into three categories based on public versus individual benefit:

• Essential Services – Programs that provide broad community benefit, such as special events and senior services, and are appropriately funded through tax support with minimal or no user fees.

• Important Services – Programs offering both community and individual benefit, such as youth sports or enrichment camps, which warrant partial cost recovery through fees.

FIGURE 3.10 | Public vs. Individual Benefit Level

Source: PROS Consulting (2025)

• Value-Added Services – Programs primarily benefiting individual users, such as specialized classes, private lessons, or facility rentals, which should strive to recover most or all costs.

This framework establishes a transparent foundation for balancing equity, sustainability, and accountability. It ensures that essential community programs remain accessible, while value-added offerings contribute proportionally to the financial health of the system.

Community Engagement

Community engagement played a key role in shaping a long-term vision for Foster City’s parks and recreation system. Beginning with the first pop-up event in August 2024, the process included a range of outreach strategies aimed at reaching diverse residents and park users. Promotion occurred across multiple channels, including the City’s website, social media, email lists, and posters in parks.

The following section provides an overview of engagement methods, and feedback received from the community. See the Appendix for detailed results.

POP-UP EVENTS

POP-UPS

A series of “pop-ups” were conducted at various locations in Foster City to solicit feedback and spread awareness of the Parks Master Plan process. The pop-ups involved simple engagement activities at community events including Summer Days, opening day of soccer season, Off the Grid, a Civics Academy, a Senior-focused event, and the Halloween Festival. Participants were asked about their overall vision for the parks and recreation system, including needed park improvements, desired amenities, and other related topics.

Key Takeaways

• Amenity Preferences: Of the ideas shown on the pop-up boards, the top three amenities participants would like to see are splash pads, beach access, and more trees and shade.

• Community Appreciation: Many participants expressed praise for Foster City parks and recreation, particularly the 4th of July event, park cleanliness, and sports facilities.

• Future Priorities: When asked about a vision for the future of Foster City parks, many participants referenced new amenities, improved maintenance and expanded programming.

Pop-up events reach wider audiences and yield valuable feedback, especially at community based events.

• July 14, 2024 at Leo J. Ryan Park

• August 16, 2024 at Leo J. Ryan Park

• September 7, 2024 at Sea Cloud Park

• September 13, 2024 at Movie Night

• September 25, 2024 at Off the Grid

• October 2, 2024 at Civics Academy

• October 14, 2024 at Senior Event

• October 24, 2024 at Halloween Festival

Pop-up events are informal and can occur at different places in the park system and around the city, reaching people where they are.

Pop-up events allow for light-touch engagement with broader audiences. Athletes (top left), parents (top right), and event goers (bottom) are some of the groups reached through these events.

FOCUS GROUPS

Focus group meetings were conducted in November 2024 at the Vibe Teen Center to gather expertise and insight on specific issues, challenges, or opportunities. The focus groups included 38 Foster City residents, community organizers, and City Staff representing the following groups:

• Organized Fitness & Sports

• Youth Advisory Committee

• Programs & Events

• Inclusion & Specialized Users

• City of Foster City Departments

Key Takeaways

• Park Facilities & Infrastructure: Expand and upgrade parks, trails, and sports facilities and improve basic amenities (lighting, restrooms, seating) for safety and usability.

• Water Access & Quality: Enhance water quality in the Lagoon and address environmental concerns, such as geese management.

• Community Engagement & Programming: Offer more inclusive programming and events year-round and improve outreach.

• Accessibility & Inclusivity: Ensure ADA compliance in parks and add shaded areas, water stations, and inclusive gathering spaces.

Focus groups gather stakeholders with shared interests and expertise to guide park and recreation planning.

• Environmental & Sustainability Considerations: Use eco-friendly landscaping, improve waste management and wildlife conservation.

• Economic & Tourism Development: Generate revenue through events and partnerships and position Foster City as a regional recreation hub while avoiding overcrowding.

• Safety & Security Enhancements: Improve park safety through strategic placement of lighting.

As kids remain involved in local programs, they contribute to building a vibrant community and stronger bonds among families.

STATISTICALLY VALID SURVEY

A statistically valid survey was conducted by ETC Institute and distributed through mail to a random sample of households. Foster City residents were surveyed on various park and recreation related topics. Responses from over 300 residents provide a statistically reliable snapshot of community input, with a ±5% margin of error — meaning the results accurately reflect the views of Foster City as a whole.

Amenity & Program Priorities

The survey identifies key investment priorities for Foster City using the Priority Investment Rating (PIR), which reflects both the level of need and importance for each recreation amenity or program (Figures 3.11 and Figure 3.12). Analysis of the results shows that residents’ top priorities center on active and passive recreational facilities, natural features, and wellness-focused programs.

FIGURE 3.11 | Recreation Facility Priority Ranking

Source: ETC Institute, 2024

Multiuse trail system-biking, walking, jogging

Walking trails in parks

Multi-purpose lawn Trees/shade

Picnic shelters & BBQ areas Nature/outdoor

Outdoor exercise/fitness equipment

Open space & conservation areas

Indoor basketball/volleyball courts

Water activities/sports Pickleball courts

Key facility priorities include multiuse trails, a recreation center 1 , indoor exercise/fitness equipment, a swimming pool, beaches, trees/ shade, and walking paths in parks

For programs and events, residents placed the highest value on fitness and wellness programs, community special events, outdoor recreation, seniors’ programs, cultural enrichment opportunities, visual and performing arts, and pickleball lessons or leagues

(1) The new Foster City Community Center was under construction during the survey period.

FIGURE 3.12 | Recreation Program Priority Ranking

Source: ETC Institute, 2024

Fitness & wellness programs

Community special events

Outdoor recreation Programs for seniors

Visual arts/crafts programs

Performing arts programs

Pickleball lessons & legacies

Tennis lessons & leagues

Outdoor environmental/nature camps & programs

After school programs for youth of all ages

Other sports leagues

Seasonal/summer day camps

Gymnastics/tumbling programs STEM classes

SENIOR & YOUTH NEEDS

Because youth and seniors have specific recreation needs, results for these households were looked at individually. Their priorities are presented below.

Senior Needs

HIGH PRIORITIES :

Older adults strongly favor amenities that support health, accessibility, and social connection. Walking and multi-use trails, senior-specific fitness programs, and community centers are viewed as the most valuable investments, helping residents stay active and connected as they age.

MEDIUM PRIORITIES :

Moderate importance is given to arts, cultural, and community programming that offer opportunities for learning and gathering. Beaches and swimming pools are appreciated but secondary to more practical and accessible recreation options.

LOW PRIORITIES :

High-intensity or competitive sports receive minimal interest. Seniors are far more focused on amenities that encourage safe movement, relaxation, and social well-being.

Youth Needs

HIGH PRIORITIES :

Families with children place the highest importance on activities that keep kids active, social, and engaged. Swimming pools, fitness programs, and outdoor play areas like playgrounds and beaches are seen as essential investments that provide year-round recreation and support family wellness.

MEDIUM PRIORITIES:

Moderate interest centers on arts, cultural programs, and community events that bring people together while also offering creative outlets. Traditional sports fields and leagues remain valued but rank slightly lower than broad recreation opportunities, suggesting families prefer flexible and inclusive spaces.

LOW PRIORITIES:

Less emphasis is placed on niche or emerging activities such as eGaming, cricket, or rugby, as well as programs that serve narrower audiences. These offerings are not seen as major community needs compared to more universal recreation opportunities.

PARK IMPROVEMENT SURVEY

Another survey asked park users what improvements they would like to see at specific parks, aiming to gather input directly from those who regularly use the parks. To reach this audience, the survey was posted on the City’s website and promoted through posters placed in Foster City parks. Open from October 2024 through January 2025, the survey received over 200 responses.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

• Well-Maintained Parks: Many parks are appreciated for their cleanliness, landscaping, and upkeep.

• Scenic Beauty: Visitors highlight the greenery, waterfront views, and open spaces.

• Diverse Amenities: Parks offer a variety of amenities, including playgrounds, sports courts, picnic areas, dog-friendly spaces, and walking paths.

• Community-Friendly Spaces: The parks are popular gathering places for families, sports, and leisure activities.

• Dog-Friendly Features: Many parks include off-leash areas, waste stations, and dogfriendly pathways.

I love our parks! Thank you for keeping our green spaces such a great part of living in this community.

The parks are well taken care of. I’m proud to live in a community that takes pride in their park system.

While many comments were positive, some respondents identified some challenges:

• Goose droppings: Some parks have issues with geese, making certain areas difficult to use.

• Amenity Improvements: Some parks could benefit from additional enhancements, such as lighting, additional restrooms, and seating.

WORKSHOPS

Two public workshops were held to engage the community at key stages of the planning process. In conjunction with these events, online surveys were also provided on the City’s website, mirroring workshop activities and allowing for expanded participation.

Workshop 1

The first workshop was held in January 2025 to introduce the process, present analysis findings, and to listen to gain a deeper understanding of the City’s parks and recreation needs. Approximately 50 people attended the workshop, and 78 people responded to the survey.

Workshops allow residents to engage with each other on important topics.

Key Takeaways

• Improving Sports Facilities: Many participants highlighted the need for better sports amenities, especially more pickleball courts and upgrades to existing tennis and pickleball facilities.

• Improving Water Quality: Cleaning the Lagoon was a common priority, as participants saw this as key to unlocking more waterfront activities such as dining, Lagoon adjacent events, and expanded recreational programming.

• Diversifying Programs and Events: Participants supported more activities to draw people into underused parks, including cultural and fitness programs like Tai Chi, concerts, art displays, and outdoor markets.

• Trail Connectivity: The trail network is valued, but participants want stronger connections, safer crossings (e,g, Hillsdale and Highway 92), and enhancements to the Levee Pedway(e.g. lighting and signage).

• Amenity Improvements: Amenity upgrades were requested, including more restrooms, shaded seating, better lighting, and enhanced children’s play areas.

We need to clean the water to allow swimming! The signs pretty much all the time say [the Lagoon] is unsafe to come in contact with the water.

Workshops are an opportunity to have residents learn more about the planning process, while engaging in conversation with their neighbors and parks and recreation staff.

Workshop 2

The second workshop occurred in June 2025, where participants weighed in on Parks Master Plan guidelines and policies, park design concepts, and park type standards. The second workshop was held at the Vibe Teen Center, and a total of 25 people attended the workshop. Two hundred seventy five people responded to the online survey.

Key Takeaways

GUIDELINES & POLICIES

• Prioritize Comfort, Accessibility, and Everyday Usability: Parks should provide consistent comfort and accessibility through essential amenities like shade, seating, restrooms, and lighting that make every space welcoming and equitable.

• Strengthen the Connection Between Parks, Nature, and the Lagoon: Policies should strengthen the City’s identity around the Lagoon by linking recreation with ecological restoration, native landscaping, and water quality protection.

• Foster Adaptability, Resilience, and Ongoing Community Engagement: Guidelines should ensure parks evolve with changing needs by promoting flexible, climate-resilient design and maintaining ongoing community involvement.

PARK BY PARK IMPROVEMENTS

• Comfort and Accessibility: Residents emphasized the importance of shade, seating, restrooms, and lighting as core features that make parks more welcoming, usable, and equitable for everyone.

• Connection to the Lagoon and Nature: People want stronger physical and visual connections to the Lagoon through paths,

seating, and native landscaping that enhance recreation while protecting water quality and habitat.

• Play, Recreation, and Gathering Spaces: The community supports more diverse and flexible recreation options, like pickleball and playgrounds to multi-purpose green space lawns, to foster both activity and social connection.

• Nature and Ecological Design: Residents value natural character and support integrating native plants, shade trees, and habitat features to create sustainable and resilient park landscapes.

• Flexibility and Adaptability: People want parks that can evolve over time through adaptable, multi-purpose designs that respond to changing recreation trends, climate conditions, and community needs.

Some of the meadows can be converted to small gardens like a succulent garden on the slope by the playground, meditation area surrounded by bamboo borders next to the gazebo, and create more shade around the benches.

Workshops were interactive and involved self-guided activities.

TASK FORCE

The City established a Task Force made up of residents that represent a broad cross-section of community interests and knowledge to help guide the Parks Master Plan process. The Task Force met at four strategic milestones during the planning process to help inform an inclusive engagement process, identify facility and programmatic opportunities, confirm the community’s vision, and to test key plan elements prior to community and City Council review.

Meeting #1

Meeting #1 introduced the Parks Master Plan process and gathered early feedback on priorities for the park system’s future. Members emphasized improving comfort and accessibility, enhancing connections to the Lagoon and natural areas, and expanding recreation and gathering opportunities across the City. The group also discussed the importance of maintenance, water quality, and tree health, as well as exploring partnerships and regional recognition. Overall, the meeting set a shared direction focused on creating a welcoming, active, and resilient park system.

Meeting #2

Meeting #2 built on the Needs Assessment findings by translating community needs into concrete goals and activation ideas. Members explored activation opportunities such as waterfront dining, interactive art, and relaxation spaces. The discussion highlighted the desire for unique, vibrant, and well-connected parks that reflect Foster City’s identity while promoting health, community, and ecological stewardship.

I had such great times at the parks when I was a kid. I hope for the same for my son. A lot of the playgrounds are the same as I grew up… they need to be updated.

Residents with local expertise are invaluable for shaping policies and actions in the plan.

Meeting #3

Meeting #3 focused on reviewing draft guidelines, policies, and park design concepts for the Parks Master Plan. Members shared feedback on the six proposed guidelines while suggesting stronger connections to the waterfront identity, better wayfinding and signage, and improved event marketing and programming. Discussion of park design concepts generated ideas around comfort amenities, shade, waterfront access, docks, and recreation flexibility. Overall, the meeting reinforced the importance of connecting parks to the Lagoon, balancing activity and nature, and designing adaptable spaces.

Meeting #4

Meeting #4 focused on more technical aspects of the Parks Master Plan , including park acreage level of service, park type standards, and site-specific recommendations. Members emphasized using thoughtful language around wildlife management, preferring to use words that consider how wildlife and humans can interact together in parks. The meeting also included a conversation around prioritizing projects and action items in the Parks Master Plan. Community priority, feasibility, functionality, condition, and safety arose as the top three considerations for prioritization amongst Task Force members.

The Task Force meetings allowed residents with specific expertise in a subject area, like athletics or the Lagoon, to contribute to the planning process and work with each other on how planning actions should be prioritized.

Summary of Recreation Needs

Through evaluating existing conditions of the park system and engaging with hundreds of City residents, the following guiding themes emerged throughout the process.

Beaches & Water Quality

• Issues with water quality and beach conditions deter recreational use

• There are opportunities to activate the water through additional amenities, access points, and water-related programming.

• Community members have strong interest in activating the Lagoon’s edges, especially through outdoor dining.

Park Comfort

• Park users would benefit from more comfortable places to relax and walk through improved shade, pathways, and seating.

• Some highly visited parks need improved or expanded restrooms.

New Park Experiences

• Foster City has a great park system, with fantastic active recreation facilities, though some park areas are underutilized.

• Residents would welcome new features to further activate and increase identity through new and unique experiences

• There is demand for more passive spaces, such as walking paths, picnic areas, beaches, and natural open spaces.

Community Events & Programs

• There is a strong desire for additional programs and events, with particular interest in programs that promote diversity and other unique events, such as seasonal holiday markets and performing arts shows.

• Fitness and outdoor recreation are high priority needs, as well as programs for kids and seniors.

• Lack of awareness is the biggest barrier to program participation followed by inconvenient program times, being too busy, or not interested in participating.

Indoor Recreation & Swimming

• Residents share a desire for fitness, senior, arts, and cultural programs, reinforcing the need for the new Community Center

• Indoor fitness equipment and a swimming pool are community needs that are so far unmet with current plans.

• School joint-use agreements are essential for the community’s access to gymnasiums.

Trails & Connectivity

• Trails are highly valued, and residents greatly appreciate the Levee Pedway.

• Residents desire additional trails connecting neighborhoods, parks, and the Levee Pedway.

• Trail improvements are needed, including increased lighting, signage, and safety.

Parks and recreation in Foster

are in good shape, and specific improvements can make them even better.

OUR VISION

Guidelines, Policies, and Actions

The following guidelines, policies, and actions form the foundation of the Foster City Parks Master Plan and are essential to realizing the community’s vision for parks and recreation. They are directly informed by the recreation needs identified through extensive community engagement and the existing conditions analysis summarized in Chapter 3. Organized around six overarching guidelines, each is supported by specific policies and actions that establish clear objectives for implementation. Together, these elements chart a path toward informed policy decisions and sustainable long-term planning.

GUIDELINE 1 : FOSTER CITY’S PARKS AND RECREATION SYSTEM IS VIBRANT, COMFORTABLE, AND RESPONSIVE.

Foster City’s parks are the heart of community life, and this plan sets a vision for making them more vibrant, welcoming, and responsive to evolving needs. The policies and actions that follow focus on re-imagining underutilized spaces with innovative features, expanding evening recreation opportunities, and enhancing comfort through improved amenities and infrastructure.

Policy 1.1 – Vibrant & Unique

Parks: Aim for all Foster City parks to be vibrant and have unique identities, incorporating in-demand and innovative features, and opportunities for evening activation.

Action 1.1.1: Increase park activation and identity by reprogramming underutilized park spaces with in-demand park amenities/ experiences, referencing the park-specific improvements identified in the Parks Master Plan

Action 1.1.2: Incorporate innovative recreational features into parks, such as sensory gardens, interactive public art, destination play, and features for nighttime activation.

Action 1.1.3: Expand passive amenities, such as walking trails, picnic areas, and natural open spaces.

Action 1.1.4: Add lighting to key park amenities to allow for extended use into the evening.

Action 1.1.5: Enhance park aesthetics through intentional design, periodic planning updates, and the use of high-quality furnishings and materials that align with the City’s brand identity.

Policy 1.2 – Comfortable Parks: Support park comfort and appeal by adding or improving key park features such as seating, lighting, and shade, and restrooms.

Action 1.2.1: Increase shade in parks by planting trees and/or constructing shade structures, particularly at playgrounds and picnic areas.

Action 1.2.2: Improve and/or expand restrooms in high-use parks, such as Leo J. Ryan, Catamaran Park, Port Royal, and Sea Cloud.

Action 1.2.3: Add additional seating, drinking water, waste receptacles, and bike racks to parks where needed.

Action 1.2.4: Improve pathway lighting in parks to increase visibility at night.

Policy 1.3 – Community Needs: Strive to make the parks and recreation system responsive to the recreation needs of Foster City residents.

Action 1.3.1: Explore opportunities to expand access to indoor recreation and swimming facilities by pursuing or strengthening partnerships with San Mateo-Foster City School District and private recreation providers.

Action 1.3.2: Complete the new community center and implement a programming plan that optimizes community use.

Action 1.3.3: Conduct a detailed study of the Sea Cloud II site to assess its environmental constraints and natural assets. Use these insights to create a master plan that balances ecological restoration with expanded recreational access and amenities.

Action 1.3.4: As opportunities arise, consider expanding Baywinds Park into adjacent public recreational and undeveloped lands to create a more integrated recreational and ecological destination with enhanced amenities and restored open space.

UNIQUE & VIBRANT PARK FEATURES & PROGRAMMING

The community’s vision is for Foster City’s parks to be more vibrant, engaging, and full of life. With creative amenities, interactive features, and lively programming, each park can develop its own personality and become a destination for fun, connection, and community adventure.

GUIDELINE 2 : FOSTER CITY HAS A CONNECTED AND ACCESSIBLE PARKS AND RECREATION SYSTEM.

Walking is the number one reason people visit Foster City’s parks, and a connected trail system is a top priority for residents. This plan envisions a safe, inviting network of trails and paths that link parks, neighborhoods, and community destinations, featuring complete walking loops, multi-modal access, and wellappointed amenities. Foster City’s parks and trails can be easy to navigate, welcoming, and vibrant spaces that inspire exploration, activity, and community connection.

Policy 2.1 – Connected Trail System:

Create a citywide network of paths and trails for walking and biking that is safe and comfortable.

Action 2.1.1: Create a connected network of paths and trails linking city parks, existing trails, and community destinations by working crossdepartmentally to implement the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan

Action 2.1.2: Provide complete walking loops or walking opportunities in parks.

Action 2.1.3: Provide trailhead amenities, such as restrooms, water fountains, bike parking, signage, and seating areas, in parks adjacent to the Levee Pedway and other significant trails.

Action 2.1.4: Create safe and comfortable pedestrian and bike crossings on major streets adjacent to parks and trails.

Action 2.1.5: Implement trail improvements on the Levee Pedway, such as paving treatments, distance markers, signage, and lighting, to create more comfortable conditions for users.

Policy 2.2 – Navigating Parks:

Promote easy access to and navigation within the City’s parks, Lagoon, and trails, by installing wayfinding signage and creating plans for multi-modal access.

Action 2.2.1: Develop a Park and Recreation Signage & Wayfinding Plan to establish clear and consistent signage across the park and recreation system.

Action 2.2.2: Increase the visibility of parks with limited street presence through wayfinding signage at nearby intersections and distinctive features at park entrances.

Action 2.2.3: Plan for multi-modal access to city parks, facilities, and events, establishing multimodal connections (i.e. trails, sidewalks, and bike lanes, etc.) and adequate parking for all modes of travel (i.e. vehicle, bike, watercraft, etc.)

Policy 2.3 – Accessible & Inclusive: Promote accessibility and inclusivity in park facilities and programs through universal design and diverse, community-responsive activities.

Action 2.3.1: Strive for compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) at all parks, incorporating the improvements identified in the 2022 Accessibility Report within park improvement projects.

Action 2.3.2: Incorporate universal design principles into park design, including amenities such as all-abilities play areas and accessible picnic areas.

Action 2.3.3: Deliver programs, facilities, and communications that celebrate the City’s cultural and generational diversity, ensuring all residents feel welcome and included.

GUIDELINE 3 : THE LAGOON AND BAY ARE

ACTIVE AND WELL-INTEGRATED WITHIN THE COMMUNITY.

The Lagoon and San Francisco Bay are defining features of Foster City, offering significant potential to enhance recreation, connection, and enjoyment. By enhancing access, amenities, programming, and waterfront experiences, Foster City can transform the Lagoon and Bay into vibrant destinations that bring residents closer and deepen connections with these unique natural assets.

Policy 3.1 – Water Access

& Amenities: Provide places and amenities to view, enjoy and access the water.

Action 3.1.1: Design parks along the Bay and Lagoon to connect seamlessly with the water, providing opportunities to view, enjoy, and access it.

Action 3.1.2: Provide watercraft docking opportunities at Lagoon-adjacent parks, designed and sized to align with park purpose and function.

Policy 3.2 – Waterfront Activation: Increase Lagoon activation through improved water quality, and increased waterfront activity.

Action 3.2.1: Collaborate across departments to implement the Lagoon Water Quality Management Plan and Canada Goose Population Management Plan to improve cleanliness of Lagoon-adjacent parks and lagoon water quality.

Action 3.2.2: Support land use regulatory changes to encourage public access and activation along the Lagoon as part of future development.

Action 3.2.3: Develop an interpretive water route along the Lagoon that includes educational and wayfinding signage.

Action 3.2.4: Continue to support and expand Lagoon-based community events (e.g. regattas, floating movie nights) to celebrate Foster City’s unique settings.

Action 3.2.5: Explore enhancements like lighting and water-based art to highlight and enliven the Lagoon experience.

ALIVE & WELL-INTEGRATED LAGOON

The Lagoon is a signature recreational feature unique to Foster City. While it already offers picturesque water views, paddling opportunities, and more, its full recreational potential remains untapped. There are many ways to bring the Lagoon to life and make it an even more vibrant destination.

Interpretive Water Trail

Waterway-based Programming & Events

Integration

Water Feature/Floating Art Installations

GUIDELINE 4: FOSTER CITY HAS LIVELY EVENTS AND PROGRAMS.

Programs and events are the heartbeat of Foster City’s parks, bringing residents together, celebrating community, and enhancing quality of life. By investing in high-priority programs and strengthening community events, Foster City can create engaging, year-round experiences that inspire participation, foster connections, and make parks vibrant centers of community life.

Policy 4.1 – Programming: Invest in high-priority programs and services that bring residents together, serve all age groups, and are responsive to community needs and desires.

Action 4.1.1: Expand high-priority programs, such as fitness and wellness, outdoor recreation, performing/visual arts, cultural enrichment, and programs for seniors.

Action 4.1.2: Survey residents to determine the best time offerings by core program area and adjust time offerings accordingly.

Action 4.1.3: Establish a continuous program evaluation framework that uses participation metrics and community feedback to refine offerings.

Action 4.1.4: Ensure all age groups are served through a well-balanced range of programs.

Policy 4.2 - Events: Strengthen community events in Foster City by improving and expanding offerings and collaborating with other recreation providers.

Action 4.2.1: Maintain support for the City’s signature events, such as 4th of July and Summer Days.

Action 4.2.2: Cultivate small-scale, neighborhood events, such as pop-up concerts, cultural nights, or art-in-the-park series to supplement larger events.

Action 4.2.3: Complement and connect with other recreation program providers and event sponsors, developing partnerships when advantageous.

GUIDELINE 5 : FOSTER CITY’S PARKS AND PROGRAMS ARE ENVIRONMENTALLY SUSTAINABLE.

Foster City’s parks are vital spaces for building a resilient, climate-conscious community. By integrating habitat connectivity, diverse plantings, green corridors, and nature-based strategies, parks can support biodiversity, conserve resources, and provide accessible opportunities to experience and learn about the natural environment. Together, these strategies position Foster City’s parks as living examples of environmental stewardship and community resilience.

Policy 5.1 – Habitat & Access to Nature: Promote habitat connectivity and access to nature in parks.

Action 5.1.1: Diversify plantings to increase biodiversity, lower water use, and add character to parks.

Action 5.1.2: Create green corridors along existing and future trails to improve habitat continuity and increase public access to nature.

Action 5.1.3: Expand conservation and restoration efforts at sites in and adjacent to Foster City parks and Bay shoreline.

Action 5.1.4: Provide educational opportunities and interpretation of the natural environment in programming, parks, and along trails.

Policy 5.2 - Resilience: Incorporate climate resilience in park improvements and programming.

Action 5.2.1: Integrate stormwater management, such as bioswales and other nature-based strategies, for water infiltration in parks.

Action 5.2.2: Conserve water in parks through turf conversion of non-active areas and through water-efficient irrigation systems.

Action 5.2.3: Integrate eco-conscious strategies such as waste reduction, energy reduction, and water conservation into programming, events, and parks.

Action 5.2.6: Ensure indoor recreation facilities function as cooling centers during days with heat advisories.

BIODIVERSE PLANTING FOR RESILIENT PARKS

California faces ongoing water supply challenges, and parks have a key role to play in conservation. Turf is one of the most waterintensive landscape features, yet much of it is not needed for active recreation. Converting non-active turf areas to climate-adapted landscapes saves water, reduces long-term maintenance costs, supports biodiversity, deters geese, and enhances the park experience with more variety, shade, and visual interest.

AB 1572: Non Functional Turf

In 2024, the State of California adopted AB 1572, which restricts the irrigation of nonfunctional turf in public landscapes. This applies to turf areas that are not used for play or community benefit, such as ornamental strips, edges, and purely decorative lawns. Despite parks being explicitly excluded from the bill, the law underscores that certain peripheral and under-utilized lawn areas are ripe for conversion to more biodiverse landscapes.

Guidelines for Reducing NonFunctional Turf

TARGET AREAS

Parking lot edges, narrow strips, buffers between amenities, and other ornamental zones. Turf areas should be preserved in central recreation areas use for sports, picnicking, events, etc.

PLANTING DESIGN

Replace turf with drought-tolerant, climateadapted species that thrive in Foster City’s unique soil conditions and high water table. Planting areas should be layered and visually appealing, designed to provide shade, texture, and seasonal interest.

IRRIGATION RETROFIT

Convert spray systems to efficient drip or bubbler irrigation tailored to new plantings.

Inspirational landscapes featuring resilient, low-water use, and bio diverse plant material

GUIDELINE 6 : OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY AND ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY

ARE CORE TO PARK AND RECREATION MANAGEMENT IN FOSTER CITY.

High-quality parks and programs depend on efficient management and wise resource use. By modernizing maintenance, adopting data-driven tools, and investing in staff and infrastructure, Foster City can ensure safe, wellmaintained, and accessible parks. Streamlined systems for registration, reservations, partnerships, and cost tracking will strengthen operations and sustain a dynamic park system that serves the community now and into the future.

Policy 6.1 – Maintenance: Continue to support high-quality park and facility maintenance by focusing on maintenance priorities and investing in maintenance staff, tools, and equipment.

Action 6.1.1: Develop a comprehensive maintenance management plan with defined outcomes and maintenance standards for each park.

Action 6.1.2: Prioritize community maintenance priorities, focusing on pathways and trails, trash removal, restrooms, and landscape care.

Action 6.1.3: Upgrade maintenance practices for standard operations, such as fully implementing the City’s GIS-based data tools to manage weekly and monthly work orders.

Action 6.1.4: Ensure consistent parks maintenance by regularly reinvesting in existing vehicles and equipment and acquiring new assets as the park system expands.

Action 6.1.5: Increase staffing by 2.5 FTE to effectively meet park operations and maintenance needs.

Policy 6.2 – Operations: Enhance the effectiveness of department operations through streamlined management systems, routine assessments, and department policies.

Action 6.2.1: Adopt a standardized facility reservation and permit system that integrates online payments, scheduling, and real-time availability.

Action 6.2.2: Develop a partnership policy and use it as the foundation for updating existing partnership agreements.

Action 6.2.3: Develop an internal “Operations Performance Dashboard” to track KPIs such as work order completion, customer response times, and satisfaction.

Action 6.2.4: Conduct routine operational assessments that assess staffing, service delivery, and customer satisfaction.

Action 6.2.5: Prepare and implement a business and operations plan for the new community center, outlining funding, staffing, and management strategies to support successful activation and long-term facility performance.

Policy 6.3 – Funding: Develop and implement a funding strategy to realize the City’s vision for its parks and recreation system.

Action 6.3.1: Adequately budget for recreation programming, park/facility maintenance, and lifecycle improvements to ensure consistent financial support to meeting accepted service levels.

Action 6.3.2: Establish a clear cost recovery policy for Foster City parks, facilities, programs and events.

Action 6.3.3: Dedicate staff resources to develop funding strategies that support park improvements, maintenance, and recreation programming and events.

Action 6.3.4: Strategically align infrastructure projects, such as irrigation upgrades, with major park and recreation improvements.

Action 6.3.5: Establish a formal parks and recreation sponsorship and philanthropy program to attract private, nonprofit, and business partnerships.

Policy 6.4 – Plan & Engage: Promote long-term success through regular planning, transparent reporting, and ongoing community engagement.

Action 6.4.1: Annually review Parks Master Plan policies and actions, adjusting as needed, and consider a comprehensive update every 10–15 years.

Action 6.4.2: Implement consistent community engagement—through surveys, town halls, focus groups, etc.—to gather input on evolving recreational needs and preferences.

Action 6.4.3: Publish an annual “State of the Parks” report summarizing progress, funding, and performance metrics to promote transparency.

Action 6.4.4: Develop a community advisory board or “Friends of Parks” group to assist with volunteer efforts and provide feedback on maintenance and capital priorities.

Park Types and Standards

Park standards establish clear guidelines for the planning, design, and evolution of parks in Foster City. These standards set expectations for amenities and ensure a consistent level of service across neighborhoods. By tailoring park requirements to their intended use and community context, this framework supports equitable access, quality recreational experiences, and sustainable development practices.

The standards address four primary park types—Community Parks, Neighborhood Parks, Mini Parks, Special Use Parks—each designed to serve distinct functions while complementing the broader park system. Park type definitions and criteria for required amenities, amenities to consider, and landscape are provided to guide future park development and improvements.

Note: Due to the unique park characteristics, not all of Foster City parks will meet these definitions or amenity requirements. These standards should be applied with discretion based on site constraints and community needs.

KEY CONSIDERATIONS

Lagoon Integration

Enhancing connections between the park and the Lagoon, boosting recreational opportunities and ecological balance.

Park Comfort

Prioritizing essential park furnishings to create a comfortable and inviting atmosphere.

Water Conservation

Exploring opportunities to reduce water use through plantings and field surfaces.

Park Activation

Integrating unique amenities to create park identity and character and increase park visibility.

Geese Management

Addressing ways to manage geese populations, ensuring cleanliness, safety, and balanced park use.

DESIGNING PARKS WITH GEESE IN MIND

Canada geese are a recurring challenge in Foster City’s parks. Large flocks of geese are attracted to open turf areas and Lagoon edges, which can lead to overgrazing, erosion, and high volumes of droppings. This not only affects the look and feel of parks but also creates water quality concerns in the Lagoon, including elevated bacteria levels.

The following design approaches, drawn from the City’s Canada Goose Population Management Plan, show how Foster City can deter geese while keeping parks accessible, attractive, and enjoyable for the community.

Geese deterrence is an important factor for designing parks in Foster City.

DESIGN APPROACHES

Landscape & Shoreline Design - Block geese, not people

• Use plantings, rock borders, and terraces to break up open turf and reduce direct goose access from the Lagoon.

• Keep vegetation low or layered to preserve views, and integrate docks, overlooks, and pathways so residents can still access and enjoy the water.

Turf Management - Breaking Up the Big Lawns

• With open fields, add planting buffers, tree rows, seat walls, or other amenities to interrupt the open sightlines geese prefer.

• Shaded areas and natural seating spots can double as comfortable gathering and recreation spaces.

Sensory Deterrents - Subtle, not disruptive.

• Noise, light, and visual cues can be used strategically to make parks less inviting to geese.

• Use sparingly and rotate locations to maintain effectiveness. Choose low-impact options that deter geese without disturbing the peaceful park experience.

COMMUNITY PARKS

Large parks (typically 10-30 acres) that serve as vibrant community hubs or popular visitor destinations, offering a mix of active and passive recreational opportunities. Thoughtfully designed amenities welcome people of all ages and interests, fostering connection and shared experiences. While some parks may lean toward recreation and others toward community gathering, each should provide a balanced combination of both to meet diverse needs.

Foster City community parks:

• Boothbay Park

• Edgewater Park

• Leo J. Ryan Park

• Sea Cloud Park

Required Amenities

• 1+ Recreational Anchor: At least one large recreation amenity with community-wide appeal (i.e. destination playground, skate park, splash pad, sports complex, dog park, bike park, pump track, disc golf, etc.). The amount should be based on park usage and level of interest.

• 1+ Community Anchor: At least one large recreation amenity with community-wide appeal i.e. community center, event space, amphitheater, etc. Amount should be based on park usage and level of interest.

• 1+ Reservable Picnic Area: Includes tables, BBQ grills, and shade (shelter or shade trees) within a clearly defined area (i.e. concrete pad)

• 4+ Dispersed Picnic Areas: (non-reservable): includes shaded picnic table(s).

• 1+ Playground: Unique or thematic playground made for ages 2-5 and 5-12. Include ample shaded seating for parents.

• 1+ Active Recreation Amenity: such as sports fields and/or courts.

• Multiuse Lawn/Green space: For unstructured play/recreation.

• Walking Loop: 1 mile or longer

• 1+ Restrooms: Quantity based on park usage and amenities.

• Maintenance Shed: For Foster City maintenance staff to store tools and supplies and serve as a work area for staff.

• Site Furnishings: Dispersed throughout the park, including:

– Pathway Lighting – Shade Structures

– Benches

– Water fountains/refill stations (near sports courts/fields)

– Recycling, compost, & trash receptacles

– Signage: Destination, Wayfinding/ informational.

• Parking: Bike racks and on-site vehicular parking.

Amenities To Consider

• Fitness Stations: Quantity based on park usage and amenities.

• Amenity Lighting: High-use amenities, such as sport courts and fields.

• Relaxation Spaces: May include pavilions, gazebos, or gardens with designated quiet areas.

• Public Art: May include murals, climbable art structures, sensory or other installations, or public art embedded in paving, site furnishings, etc.

Landscaping

• Trees: Large shade trees should be plentiful, aiming for a tree canopy of at least 25% of the site at maturity. Tree species should be diverse and appropriate for Foster City soil, water, and climatic conditions.

• Natural Turf: For active use areas, such as sports fields, multipurpose lawn, or picnic areas.

• Artificial Turf: Limited to active areas where it serves a functional purpose (such as a sports field). Passive areas should incorporate organic fill where possible.

• Native/Ornamental Planting Areas: In passive areas, plant species that are native, drought-tolerant, and/or habitat-supporting, when possible.

• Identity Plantings: Distinct, landmark trees and/or planting areas in key areas to establish stronger park identity, such as park entrances/gateways and central gathering places.

SPECIAL ELEMENTS

FOR LAGOON-ADJACENT PARKS

Boat Docking: Constructed with appropriate materials and specs for temporary boat parking and loading.

Watercraft Storage: Storage for kayaks and other small non-motorized craft for residents who don’t have water access.

Boardwalk : To serve people using the dock for recreational functions, equipped with seating and lighting.

Viewing Areas: May include benches and stationary binoculars.

Food Concessions: May include café space, concession stand, or a mobile food cart/truck operation.

GEESE MANAGEMENT

Implement strategies identified in the Integrated Adaptive Canada Goose Management Plan to limit geese presence in parks such as installing access barriers, modifying habitat along the water’s edge, and ensuring minimal aesthetic and recreational disruption for Lagoon users.

NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS

Medium-sized parks (typically 2 to 10 acres) provide amenities that meet the daily recreational needs for one or more neighborhoods.

Foster City neighborhood parks:

• Catamaran Park

• Erckenbrack Park

• Farragut Park

• Gull Park

• Ketch Park

• Killdeer Park

• Marlin Park

• Port Royal Park

• Shad Park

• Shorebird Park

• Sunfish Park

• Turnstone Park

Required Amenities

• 1+ Recreational Anchor: At least one large recreation amenity with community-wide appeal (i.e. destination playground, skate park, sports complex, dog park, bike park, pump track, disc golf, etc.). Amount should be based on park usage and level of interest.

• Playground: Unique or thematic playground. Include ample shaded seating for parents. Playground may serve ages 2-4, 5-12, or all.2+ Dispersed Picnic Areas: (nonreservable): includes shaded picnic table(s)

• Multiuse Lawn/Green space: For unstructured play/recreation.

• Site Furnishings: Dispersed throughout the park, including:

– Pathway Lighting

– Shade Structures

– Benches

– Water fountains/refill stations:

– Recycling, compost & trash receptacles

– Bike racks

– Signage: Destination

• Parking: Bike racks, on-street parking.

Amenities To Consider

• Reservable Picnic Area: Includes tables, BBQ grills, and shade (shelter or shade trees) within a clearly defined area (i.e. concrete pad)

• Restrooms: Based on park size and amenities.

• Public Art: May include murals, climbable art structures, sensory installations, or public art embedded in paving, site furnishings, etc.

• Relaxation Spaces: May include pavilions, gazebos, or gardens with designated quiet areas.

• Fitness Station: Quantity based on park usage and amenities.

• Walking Loop: Perimeter loop.

• Parking: On-site parking.

SPECIAL ELEMENTS

Landscaping

• Trees: Large shade trees should be plentiful, aiming for a tree canopy of at least 25% of the site at maturity. Tree species should be diverse and appropriate for Foster City soil, water, and climatic conditions.

• Natural Turf: For active use areas, such as sports fields, multipurpose lawn, or picnic areas.

• Artificial Turf: Limited to active areas where it serves a functional purpose (such as a sports field). Not to be used in passive areas.

• Native/Ornamental Planting Areas: In passive areas, plant species that are native, drought-tolerant, and/or habitat-supporting, when possible.

• Identity Plantings: Distinct, landmark trees and/or planting areas in key areas to establish stronger park identity, such as park entrances/gateways and central gathering places.

FOR LAGOON-ADJACENT PARKS

Boat Docking: Constructed with appropriate materials and specs for temporary boat parking and loading.

Shoreline Amenities: Treatments that allow interaction with the water, such as beaches, boardwalk, plaza overlook, and picnic areas.

GEESE DETERRENCE

Implement strategies identified in the Integrated Adaptive Canada Goose Management Plan to limit geese presence in parks such as installing access barriers, modifying habitat along the water’s edge, and ensuring minimal aesthetic and recreational disruption for Lagoon users.

MINI PARKS

Small parks (typically less than 1 acre that provide basic recreation amenities for nearby residents in a specific neighborhood or subdivision. Amenities in Mini parks are more passive than other park types.

Foster City mini parks:

• Arcturus Park

• Gateshead Park

• Leo Park

• Pompano Park

Required Amenities

• Multiuse Lawn/Green space: For unstructured play/recreation.

• 1+ Dispersed Picnic Areas (non-reservable): Includes shaded picnic table(s).

• Site Furnishings: Dispersed throughout the park: seating.

• Parking: Bike racks, on-street parking.

Amenities To Consider

• Additional Site Furnishings:

– Pathway Lighting

– Shade Structures

– Water fountains/refill stations

– Recycling, Compost & Trash Receptacles

– Signage: Destination

Landscaping

• Trees: Large shade trees should be plentiful, aiming for a tree canopy of at least 25% of the site at maturity. Tree species should be diverse and appropriate for Foster City soil, water, and climatic conditions.

• Natural Turf: For active use areas, such as sports fields, multipurpose lawn, or picnic areas.

• Artificial Turf: Not to be used in Mini Parks.

• Native/Ornamental Planting Areas: In passive areas, plant species that are native, drought-tolerant, and/or habitat-supporting, when possible.

• Identity Plantings: Distinct, landmark trees and/or planting areas in key areas to establish stronger park identity, such as park entrances/gateways and central gathering places.

Mini parks are not large enough to support active recreation amenities, such as playgrounds or sports fields.

SPECIAL USE PARKS

Designed around a special use which serves a specific recreational need or population group (such as dog owners or windsurfers).

Amenities depend on the purpose of the site. Certain supporting amenities should be standard across all sites.

Foster City special use parks:

• Bridgview Park

• Baywinds Park

• Boat/Dog Park

Required Amenities

• Special Recreation Feature(s): Special defining feature to anchor the park (dog park, boat launch, etc.)

• Site Furnishings: Dispersed throughout the park, with seating and recycling, compost, & trash receptacles.

• Signage

Amenities To Consider

• Additional Recreation Amenities such as picnic areas, playgrounds, etc.

• Restrooms

• Storage for recreational activities

• Additional Site Furnishings:

– Pathway Lighting

– Shade Structures

– Water fountains/refill stations

– Signage: Wayfinding/informational.

– Parking: Off-Street

Landscaping

• Trees: Large shade trees should be plentiful, aiming for a tree canopy of at least 25% of the site at maturity. Tree species should be diverse and appropriate for Foster City soil, water, and climatic conditions.

• Natural Turf: For active use areas, such as sports fields, multipurpose lawn, or picnic areas.

• Artificial Turf: Limited to active areas where it serves a functional purpose (such as dog run at Baywinds Park). Not to be used in passive areas.

• Native/Ornamental Planting Areas: In passive areas, plant species that are native, drought-tolerant, and/or habitat-supporting, when possible.

• Identity Plantings: Distinct, landmark trees and/or planting areas in key areas to establish stronger park identity, such as park entrances/gateways and central gathering places.

TRAILS & PATHWAYS

Trails and Pathways link parks and places together and serve as a recreational facility for people walking, biking, or jogging.

Foster City trails & pathways:

• Levee Pedway

• Arcturus

• Pilgrim

• Constitution

Required Amenities

• Trail Surface: Asphalt or concrete, at least 8’ wide.

• Site Furnishings: Dispersed on trail/ concentrated at trailheads, including:

– Seating

– Recycling, compost, & trash receptacles.

Amenities To Consider

• Restrooms

• Additional Site Furnishings:

– Signage: Destination.

– Pathway Lighting

– Shade Structures

– Water fountains/refill stations

– Signage: Wayfinding/informational.

Landscaping

• Native/Ornamental Planting: Open space adjacent to trails should be native, droughttolerant, and/or habitat-supporting, requiring minimal maintenance.

• Identity Plantings: Distinct, landmark trees and/or planting areas in key areas to emphasize trailhead, trail junctions, viewing areas, etc.

• Shade Trees: Depending on trail context, considering planting shade trees at regular intervals.

Park-Specific Recommendations

The following section outlines capital improvement recommendations for each Foster City park. These park-specific recommendations are informed by the park assessments, extensive community engagement (see Chapter 3), and input from a staff park-by-park workshop. All proposed enhancements align with the park type standards and amenity level of service criteria established as part of this Parks Master Plan , ensuring consistent quality and functionality across the City’s park system.

For most parks, recommendations are presented as targeted improvement lists. For five key parks—Leo J. Ryan, Sea Cloud, Boothbay, Edgewater, and Gull—more detailed design concepts are provided to illustrate potential enhancements.

BOOTHBAY PARK

Community Park

Area: 11.21 acres

Boothbay Park is an 11.2-acre community park, well-connected to surrounding neighborhoods and offering a variety of amenities, including playgrounds, sports courts, open lawns, and a group picnic area. The assessment and engagement process highlighted opportunities to enhance comfort, accessibility, and yearround usability through improvements such as shade, updated amenities, and better circulation and lighting.

The proposed design emphasizes enhanced play, flexible gathering spaces, and overall site improvements, including an all-abilities play area, a central plaza for events, and a multi-purpose lawn for sports and informal recreation. The vision is a more functional, accessible, and versatile park that supports a broad range of recreational and social activities.

Additional Improvements:

• Pathway lighting

• Benches

• Bike racks

• Recycling/compost/trash receptacles

• Water bottle refill/dog water stations

• Irrigation upgrade (expand coverage, replace piping wiring and sprinklers)

Design Ideas

ENHANCED PLAY

Create a unique all-abilities play area, which provides a challenging and interesting experience for kids. Consider age and mobility needs in the design. Select accessible surfacing (EWF, pour-in-place, etc.)

PICNIC SITES

Create two reservable (one large, and one medium) and non-reservable picnic areas, dispersed throughout the site and wellintegrated into the existing path network.

CENTRAL HUB PLAZA

Reconfigure central plaza to accommodate larger group gatherings - cultural events (i.e. taichi, etc.) and parties. Provide shade and seating.

MULTIPURPOSE LAWN

A multi-purpose lawn would accommodate organized and unstructured sports, such as soccer, cricket, Frisbee, and other group activities.

BOOTHBAY PARK

Proposed Design Concept

BOOTHBAY AVE

Enhanced entry signage

Improved reservable picnic area

Trees better shade site and seating areas

ST

Existing restroom

Existing basketball court

Sports Court Lighting

Native planting edge provides screening

Improved volleyball court with seating

Reservable picnic area

Existing softball field

Ornamental planting creates welcoming entry points

New paths, to complete loop trail

Existing tennis courts

Existing mature trees, define entries

Plaza

*Irrigation upgrades needed throughout

Playground

Picnic Sites

Sport amenity

Native planting

EDGEWATERBLVD

Loop trail

Pedestrian Path

Existing amenities Legend

Gateway/sign

Trees P

Existing trees

Parking

Ornamental planting

Existing restrooms

Enhanced meadow

Existing access points

EDGEWATER PARK

Community Park

Area: 8.5 acres

Edgewater Park is an 8.5-acre community park with several sports courts, a ballfield, and a playground. The park lacks a central space for group or community gatherings and does not have a pathway loop, leaving the northwest portion underutilized.

The proposed design transforms Edgewater into a more welcoming and versatile destination. A new looped pathway system will connect amenities and activate the park’s far side with opportunities for walking, picnicking, and casual play. A central plaza with a reservable picnic area will serve as a community hub, while enhanced entrances with plantings, paths, and signage will create a more inviting experience

Additional Improvements:

• Benches

• Bike racks

• Recycling/compost/trash receptacles

• Water bottle refill / dog water stations

• Irrigation upgrade (replace piping wiring and sprinklers)

Design Ideas

MULTI-USE MEADOW

Activate the northern lawn by providing amenities for passive activities, such as informal sports, picnicking, walking, and offleash dog running.

PARK LOOP

Create a walking loop around the perimeter of the park that connects key amenities and is enhanced by diverse landscapes, mature shade trees, and consistent comfort features such as seating and picnic areas.

PLAZA AND SEATING

Create a vibrant park center by developing a central plaza that serves as a gathering space between amenities. The plaza should feature shaded seating areas with reservable tables and include a shade structure to accommodate larger groups or small events.

EDGEWATER PARK

Proposed Design Concept

New path completes loop trail and connects to existing amenities

Existing basketball court

Existing ballfield

Reservable Group Picnic Area

Existing playground

Reduced path width to allow for additional planting

Existing picnic area

Existing tennis courts

Ornamental planting creates welcoming entry points

Existing picnic area

REGULUSST

Dense vegetation to buffer sound and sight of busy street

Secondary path activates lawn

Plaza

Picnic Sites

Sport amenity

Native planting

Ornamental planting

Enhanced meadow

Gateway/sign

Loop trail

Pedestrian Path

Trees

Existing trees

Existing restrooms

Access Point

Existing amenities

LEO J. RYAN PARK

Community Park

Area: 20.7 acres

Leo J. Ryan Park is the cornerstone of Foster City’s park system, located along the Lagoon and offering a wide range of amenities that make it a vibrant hub for community gathering and recreation. Signature features include two community recreation buildings, a waterfront boardwalk with rentals, a skate park, pickleball courts, an amphitheater, and a reservable group picnic area.

Beloved by the community, future improvements aim to further activate the waterfront1 , expand pickleball opportunities, bring new energy to the park’s western edge, and conserve water in its more passive landscapes. These enhancements aim to ensure the park and lagoon remain a central hub for recreation, culture, and community pride.

Additional Improvements:

Amenities:

• Bike racks

• Recycling/compost/trash receptacles

• Water bottle refill / dog water stations

• Minor irrigation upgrade (replace piping wiring and sprinklers)

• Wayfinding Signage

Design Ideas

ACTIVATED WATERFRONT

The activated waterfront includes lighting along the boardwalk, flowering ornamental trees, viewpoints, and docks. These enhancements will encourage walking along the waterfront during the day and nighttime, facilitate boating activities, and establish the Lagoon as a notable landmark and destination.

WATER TERRACE

This area is an extension of the activated seating area/plaza. The overlook is a place to gather, and encourages interaction with the water.

(1) See the Leo J. Ryan Park Boardwalk & Waterfront Master Plan (2024) for more infomration

NATURE HUB

A nature hub could include small nature play and adult fitness zones, tucked within a native plantings. Other passive amenities, such as public art, habitat garden, or relaxation spaces, may be considered.

GATEWAY HARBOR

A path and direct visual corridor would lead to an open view of the Lagoon, highlighted by an artistic gateway sculpture and fountain. A dock and deck would bring people closer to the water, and encourage people to pause and enjoy the setting. This is an ideal location to view fireworks.

EVENT SPACE BOAT RENTAL AND DOCK

Activate the event space facing Shell Boulevard with an improved stage. The adjacent lawn can be used for seating during events, and outside of event hours for informal recreation activities.

Paint mural on boat rental building to activate the space and improve visibility. Provide a dock where people may depart and return from their boating trips.2

(2) See the Leo J. Ryan Park Boardwalk & Waterfront Master Plan (2024) for more infomration

LEO J. RYAN PARK

Proposed Design Concept Spread A

Plaza

Playground

Picnic Sites

Sport amenity

Native planting

Ornamental planting

Enhanced meadow

Gateway/sign

Loop trail

E HILLSDALEBLVD

P

Habitat zone with native planting

Pedestrian Path

Trees

Existing trees

Parking

Existing restrooms

Existing access points

Access Point

Existing amenities

Ornamental trees

Existing boardwalk

Opportunity to activate park through future development

Seating

E HILLSDALEBLVD

Gateway Sculpture

Fountain completes axis

Improved watercraft docking

Planting buffer from street

LEO J. RYAN PARK

Proposed Design Concept Spread B

Existing Pergola

Temporary fence for events

Legend

Plaza

Playground

Picnic Sites

Sport amenity

Native planting

Ornamental planting

Enhanced meadow

Gateway/sign

P

Water trail

Pedestrian Path

Trees

Existing trees

Parking

Existing restrooms

Existing access points

Existing amenities

Dock/Boardwalk

Access Point

String lights

Planned community center

Activation opportunity

Existing Pergola Boardwalk behind stage to divert traffic during performances

SHELL BLVD

Artistic crosswalks to emphasize entrance

Improved Gateway Expanded stage Street closed during special events

Future crosswalk connection

Future playground

Future plaza/ seating area

Future Parking/ Food truck area

Existing skatepark Existing pickleball

Gathering area

SEA CLOUD PARK

Community Park

Area: 23.9 acres (not including Sea Cloud II Site)

Sea Cloud Park is the community’s 24-acre sports park, offering multiple sports fields, from baseball diamonds to soccer fields, and connected to the Levee Pedway Trail.

The recommended improvements build on the park’s success as a sports destination while adding features to diversify the user experience. Priorities include upgraded sports fields, a unique play area, new support facilities, and expanded opportunities to connect with the Lagoon and gather as a community. The City-owned site directly east of the park (Sea Cloud II) remains undeveloped open space, offering potential for future ecological restoration and recreational opportunities.

Additional Improvements:

• Pathway lighting

• Benches

• Bike racks

• Water bottle refill

• Recycling/compost/trash receptacles

• Irrigation upgrade (update equipment, replace piping wiring and sprinklers)

Sea Cloud Park is a major destination for sports and group activities (top), and the park is located directly adjacent to the lagoon (bottom).

Design Ideas

THEMED PLAY

A unique and thematic play area could provide an interesting play experience while enhancing park character. A sports theme may best relate to the site.

WATERFRONT AREA

Activate the waterfront by providing a boat dock, and trimming vegetation to enhance views.

CENTRAL HUB

Create central plaza area, with views to the water. The building could include maintenance storage, rentable space, and snack-shack.

RESTORATION AND RESILIENCE

Restore existing wetland habitat, so as to improve biodiversity and strengthen resilience to flooding. For example, planting native, salt-tolerant, hydrophilic plants in the basin, will appropriately accommodate for periodic flooding and wetland conditions.

SEA CLOUD PARK

Proposed Design Concept

PITCAIRN DR

Reservable shade structure and seating area

Enhanced street frontage

SEACLOUDDR

New maintenance shed

Dog run

Destination baseball field with lights and spectator seating

Levee Pedway

Dispersed picnic areas

Native planting on slopes

Vegetation trimmed to enhance views

Secondary paths

* Improvements to wetland need further study to understand ecological opportunities and constraints (see page X for more information)

Educational signage

Existing batting cage facility

Enhanced loop path

Boardwalk with wildlife viewing deck

Legend

Plaza

Playground

Picnic Sites

Sport amenity

Native planting

Ornamental planting

Enhanced meadow

Gateway/sign

Loop trail

P

Pedestrian Path

Trees

Existing trees

Parking

Existing restrooms

Existing access points

Access Point

Existing amenities

BEACH PARKS: GULL, MARLIN, & ERCKENBRACK

Neighborhood Parks

Area: 3.1 to 3.5 acres

Gull, Marlin, and Erckenbrack are Foster City’s three "beach parks." Built on similar parcels around the same time, each offers direct Lagoon access, walking paths, play equipment, and restrooms. They remain popular picnic destinations, though none currently provide defined group areas. Much of the infrastructure is aging, and geese continue to affect long-term park function and usability.

Recommended improvements focus on revitalizing the waterfront to strengthen connections with the Lagoon, enhance biodiversity, and mitigate geese impacts. Plans also call for replacing aging infrastructure, upgrading group picnic areas, and adding new features to give each park a refreshed identity.

Additional Improvements:

• Minor irrigation upgrades (replace piping wiring and sprinklers).

• Pathway lighting

• Benches

• Bike Racks

• Recycling/compost/trash receptacles

• Water bottle refill

• Potential circulation fountain near beach to improve water quality.

• Power supply

Erckenbrack, Gull, and Marlin Park's lagoon beaches make them unque. The recommended improvements to these parks aim to unlock more activation opportunities.

Design ideas

DECKS/DOCKS ALONG WATER

Activate the water by providing decks and boat docks along the edge. Reduce the amount of beach area, with edge planting.

ECOTONE LAGOON PLANTING

Create diverse habitat at the water’s edge to foster biodiversity and to deter geese habitation.

INTIMATE BEACH

Create an intimate space on the beach with seating tucked within native and marsh vegetation. This can be a gathering space for families, dogwalkers, and more.

ENHANCED PLAY

Thematic and unique play area, which provides an interesting play experience while enhancing the park character.

BEACH PARKS: GULL, MARLIN, & ERCKENBRACK

Proposed Design Concept

Enhanced secondary entrances

Improved beach* Fountain to circulate water

*The beach is redesigned per guidance from the Geese Management Plan.

Key improvements include activating the beach for recreational use, encouraging dogs to use the space, and vegetating the shoreline.

Reservable picnic area with shade structure

GULL AVE

Healthy mature trees, preserved

Replaced restroom

Legend

Deck

Playground

Picnic Sites

Sport amenity

Native planting

Ornamental planting

Enhanced meadow

Gateway/sign

Pedestrian Path

Loop trail

Trees

Existing trees

Existing restrooms

Existing access points

Access Point

Existing amenities

CATAMARAN PARK

Neighborhood Park

Catamaran Park offers a variety of recreational amenities and is one of several parks bordering the Lagoon. The park features a heavily used artificial turf soccer field and active tennis courts.

Recommended improvements focus on enhancing park function and comfort while strengthening connections to the Lagoon.

RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS

Amenities:

• Reservable picnic area with shade structure

• Field lighting

• Fitness station

• Small boat dock

• Bike racks

• Recycling/compost/trash receptacles

• Water bottle refill / dog water stations

Landscape:

• Shade trees

• Low water-use /geese deterring plantings in passive areas to replace turf.

• Ornamental plantings at entrances.

Infrastructure:

• Irrigation upgrade (expand coverage, replace piping wiring and sprinklers)

• Partially replace existing fence along the water, replacing with more engaging/ aesthetic barrier(ie. seat wall, planters, decorative barriers, etc.)

Other:

• Explore potential partnerships with adjacent landowners for expanded parking.

FARRAGUT PARK

Neighborhood Park

BeachParkBlvd.

Area: 3.86 acres

Farragut Park is well-used neighborhood park with a nice playground, walking loop, and open lawn area with many mature trees.

Recommended improvements are focused on improving park comfort and conserving water.

RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS

Amenities:

• Small shade structure

• Picnic tables

• Demonstration garden

• Pathway lighting

• Bike racks

• Recycling/compost/trash receptacles

• Water bottle refill / dog water stations

Landscape:

• Additional Trees (Arboretum)

• Low water-use / geese-deterring plantings in passive areas to replace turf

• Ornamental plantings at entrances

Infrastructure:

• Irrigation upgrade (improve coverage and pressure, update equipment, replace piping wiring and sprinklers)

KETCH PARK

Neighborhood Park

Area: 1.6 acres N

Despite its small size, Ketch Park is a well-used neighborhood park that offers shady spots to relax and play. Its pathways provide an important and active connection between culde-sacs.

Recommended improvements aim to increase comfort with more shade and better lighting.

RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS

Amenities:

• Small shade structure

• Pathway lighting

• Water bottle refill / dog water stations

• Recycling/ compost/trash receptacles

• Bike rack

Landscape:

• Shade trees

• Low water-use / geese-deterring plantings in passive areas to replace turf.

• Ornamental plantings at entrances.

Other:

• New Identity Signage

KILLDEER PARK

Neighborhood Park

Area: 2.2 acres

Killdeer Park is well connected to the adjacent school and surrounding neighborhoods, featuring a new playground, open lawn areas, and a community garden managed by Audubon Elementary.

Recommended improvements focus on enhancing comfort with additional shade and lighting, while also reducing water consumption.

RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS

Amenities:

• Dispersed picnic areas, shaded

• Bike racks

• Recycling/compost/trash receptacles

• Water bottle refill / dog water stations

• Pathway lighting

Landscape:

• Shade trees

• Low water-use / geese-deterring plantings in passive areas to replace turf

Infrastructure:

• Irrigation upgrade (improve coverage and pressure, update equipment, replace piping wiring and sprinklers)

PORT ROYAL PARK

Neighborhood Park

Despite its compact size, Port Royal features a heavily used artificial turf field that serves organized sports. The park is also well connected to the Levee Pedway, functioning as a trailhead.

Recommended improvements focus on enhancing comfort, recreation, and amenities through the addition of a shade structure, expanded restrooms, and more seating areas.

RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS

Amenities:

• Small shade structure

• Pathway lighting

• Shaded seating area near the Levee Pedway

• Small fitness station

• Ball netting near Levee Pedway

• Water bottle refill / dog water stations

• Recycling/compost/trash receptacles

• Bike rack

Landscape:

• Shade trees

• Low water-use / geese-deterring plantings in passive areas to replace turf

• Ornamental plantings at entrances

Infrastructure:

• New expanded restroom

• Minor irrigation upgrade (replace piping wiring and sprinklers)

Other:

• Wayfinding signage at interface with Levee Pedway.

SHAD PARK

Neighborhood Park

Acres: 2.1 acres

Shad Park is set in a quiet location, shaded by large redwoods, and provides an important pedestrian connection between neighborhoods. The park includes a playground, basketball court, and open lawn areas.

Recommended improvements include replacing the playground and enhancing overall comfort, while also reducing water consumption.

RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS

Amenities:

• New playground

• Benches (basketball court)

• Bike racks

• Recycling/ compost/trash receptacles

• Water fountain / water bottle refill / dog water stations

Landscape:

• Low water-use / geese-deterring plantings in passive areas to replace turf

• Ornamental planting at entrances

Infrastructure:

• Irrigation upgrade (update equipment, improve coverage, replace piping wiring and sprinklers).

SHOREBIRD PARK

Neighborhood Park

Area: 3.5 acres N

Shorebird Park sits directly alongside the Levee Pedway Trail and features a fitness station, picnic areas, and low-water-use landscaping. At its center, the park includes a large woodchipped area that is currently underutilized.

Recommended improvements focus on reprogramming this central space with an in-demand amenity and increasing shade throughout the park.

RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS

Amenities:

• Reprogram central area (dog park, pump track, etc.)

• Bike racks

• Recycling/compost/trash receptacles

• Water bottle refill / dog water stations

Landscape:

• Drainage / green infrastructure enhancements

SUNFISH PARK

Neighborhood Park

Sunfish Park is a quiet neighborhood park with a playground and basketball court, well connected to the surrounding neighborhood. However, portions of the site remain exposed and underutilized. Recommended improvements focus on enhancing recreation, comfort, and circulation through upgraded walking paths, picnicking areas, and play opportunities.

RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS

Amenities:

• New playground

• 2 small, dispersed picnic areas (one with small shade structure)

• Loop path

• Water fountain

• Benches (near basketball court)

• Bike racks

• Recycling/compost/trash receptacles

• Water bottle refill / dog water stations

Landscape:

• Shade trees

• Low water-use / geese-deterring plantings in passive areas to replace turf

• Ornamental planting at entrances

Infrastructure:

• Irrigation upgrade (update equipment, improve coverage, replace piping wiring and sprinklers)

TURNSTONE PARK

Neighborhood Park

Turnstone Park is set in a quiet shaded location and provides an important pedestrian connection between neighborhoods. The park includes a playground, basketball court, and open lawn areas.

Recommended improvements include enhancing overall park comfort, while also reducing water consumption.

RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS

Amenities:

• Bike racks

• Benches (near basketball court)

• Recycling/ compost/trash receptacles

• Water bottle refill / dog water stations

Landscape:

• Shade trees

• Low water-use / geese-deterring plantings in passive areas to replace turf

• Ornamental planting at entrances

Infrastructure:

• Irrigation upgrade (update equipment, improve coverage, replace piping wiring and sprinklers)

ARCTURUS PARK

Park

Area: 0.8 acres

As one of the smaller parks in the system, Arcturus Park provides a small play area and mature shade trees for the enjoyment of nearby residents.

Recommended improvements focus on improved entrance visibility and additional comfort amenities.

RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS

Amenities:

• Small shade structure (over picnic table)

• Benches (near playground)

• Bike racks

• Recycling/ compost/trash receptacles

Landscape:

• Shade trees at seating areas

• Low water-use/geese deterring plantings in passive areas to replace turf

• Ornamental plantings at entrances

Infrastructure:

• Irrigation upgrade (improve coverage, update equipment, replace popping, wiring, and sprinklers)

GATESHEAD PARK

Area: 0.73 acres

As one of the City’s smallest parks, Gateshead Park serves as a trailhead park to the Levee Pedway. With landscape and furnishing improvements recently completed, Gateshead Park is in great condition.

Recommended improvements are minimal but focus on increased shade and water conservation.

RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS

Amenities:

• Small shade structure (over picnic table)

• Recycling/compost/trash receptacles

• Water bottle refill / dog water stations

Landscape:

• Low water-use / geese-deterring plantings in passive areas to replace turf.

• Ornamental plantings at entrances

Infrastructure:

• Irrigation upgrade (improve coverage, update equipment, replace piping wiring and sprinklers)

LEO PARK

Leo Park is the smallest park in the system, and features a small landscape area and benches.

Recommended improvements focus on conserving water and increasing shade.

RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS

Landscape:

• Shade trees

• Low water-use / geese-deterring plantings in passive areas to replace turf.

POMPANO PARK

Area: 0.5 acres N

Largely unknown to many residents, Pompano is the second smallest park in the system, offering only a small lawn and no additional amenities.

Recommended improvements focus on conserving water while enhancing functionality with added shade and seating.

RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS

Amenities:

• Pathway

• Picnic table

• Benches

Landscape:

• Shade Trees

• Low water-use / geese-deterring plantings in passive areas to replace turf.

Infrastructure:

• Irrigation upgrade (improve coverage, replace piping wiring and sprinklers, improve coverage)

Other:

• Identity Signage

BAYWINDS PARK

Special Use Park

Baywinds Park lies on the shores on the San Francisco Bay and is directly on the San Francisco Bay Trail. The park serves as a recreational destination for windsurfers, dogwalkers, and people walking and biking along the Bay Trail.

Recommended improvements focus on providing additional shade and comfort, as well as generating revenue through an expanded paid parking lot.

RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS

Amenities:

• Medium shade structure

• Paid washing station

• Fitness station

• Targeted lighting improvements

• Benches

• Recycling/compost/trash receptacles

• Water bottle refill /dog water station

• Benches (near playground)

• Bike racks

Landscape:

• Ornamental planting next to parking and restroom

Infrastructure:

• Expanded parking along Lakeside Dr.

• Parking fee station

BOAT/DOG PARK

Special Use Park

Boat/Dog Park provides a unique waterfront recreation experience, with boat launch access, Duffy boat rentals, and a dedicated fenced dog area that attracts both boating enthusiasts and pet owners.

Recommended improvements aim to enhance comfort and usability through an expanded restroom, added shade, improved lighting, and upgraded seating.

RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS

Amenities:

• Targeted lighting improvements

• Bike racks

• Recycling/ compost/trash receptacles

• Water bottle refill / dog water station

Landscape:

• Shade trees by picnic tables and dog park.

• Low water-use plantings in passive areas to replace turf.

• Ornamental plantings and entrances.

Infrastructure:

• New double-occupancy restroom

• Irrigation upgrade (replace piping wiring and sprinklers).

Other:

• Consider relocating dog park and focusing design on boat use (see Shorebird).

BRIDGEVIEW PARK

Special Use Park

Area: 3.18 acres

As one of the City’s newest parks, Bridgeview serves as a gateway to the Levee Pedway Trail. The park includes a modern restroom, park furniture, and recent landscape upgrades.

Recommended improvements focus on adding shade structures and trees, as the park is currently very exposed.

RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS

Amenities:

• Small shade structures (over picnic tables)

• Recycling/compost/trash receptacles

Landscape:

• Shade trees

Infrastructure:

• Drainage/green infrastructure enhancements

Other:

• Wayfinding and informational signage

REALIZING OUR VISION

Implementing Park Improvements

Implementing the physical park improvements described in Chapter 4 will require substantial investment. A thoughtful phasing strategy is essential to ensure the Plan’s recommendations are both achievable and sustainable. Table 5.1:

Action Plan provides a practical framework for implementation, helping the City prioritize projects, allocate resources effectively, and sequence investments into manageable phases. It also provides guidance for preparing Capital Improvement Programs (CIP) and annual budgets while connecting project priorities to available funding strategies.

Phasing ensures a realistic and strategic approach to implementation. Each recommended park improvement is organized into clear project packages and assigned to the following phases:

• Phase I (0–5 years)

• Phase II (6–10 years)

• Phase III (11+ years)

A fourth category, “Other Projects to Consider,” includes lower-priority and/or higher-cost projects that should be pursued if funding or partnership opportunities arise.

Phasing decisions were based on three key factors:

• Prioritization – The degree to which each proposed project aligns with the established evaluation criteria (see page 143 for more detail).

• Cost – The overall affordability of each project, with lower-priority and higher-cost projects typically placed in later phases or the “Other Projects to Consider” category.

• Efficiency – The potential to combine projects to minimize site disturbance and leverage economies of scale (see page 144 for additional detail).

The following section describes the assumptions and procedures used to guide phasing decisions.

PRIORITIZATION

More than 200 proposed park improvements were evaluated through a prioritization framework designed to balance City priorities and ensure that resources are directed toward projects with the most meaningful and lasting impact. The criteria help identify which projects provide the greatest overall community benefit and which address more specialized or longterm needs. This framework can be used not only to rank projects but also to guide their design and scope to better align with community priorities.

5.1 | Prioritization Criteria

Each project was scored from 1 to 3 based on how well it met the criteria shown in Figure 5.1 Detailed prioritization results are presented in the Appendix. While scores vary by park, several improvement types consistently ranked high: comfort amenities (such as seating, drinking fountains, and lighting), shade trees and structures, and low-water, geesedeterring landscapes. Other higher-ranking improvements included restrooms, group picnic areas, and walking loops. Lower-ranking improvements included identity signage and unique features such as art installations, fitness stations, and boat docks.

Community Priority: Alignment with community engagement findings.

Resolves Deficiency: Addresses a deficient amenity or accommodates future growth (LOS).

Equity: Expands access for underserved groups or disinvested areas; improves accessibility.

Functionality, Condition, and Safety: Addresses infrastructure issues; enhances park operations or safety; supports geese management.

Environmental Sustainability: Advances water conservation, water quality, biodiversity, wildlife habitat, and climate resilience.

Operational Efficiency and Sustainability : Reduces long-term maintenance costs, increases cost recovery, or supports sustainable infrastructure.

Feasibility: Considers affordability, funding opportunities, partnerships, and staff capacity.

COSTS

A clear understanding of costs is essential for realistic and sustainable implementation. Successful delivery of this Plan depends not only on securing capital funds to build improvements but also on ensuring the City can afford to operate and maintain them over time. True costs extend beyond construction and include long-term needs such as lifecycle replacements, utilities, staffing, and program support. Considering both direct and indirect expenses gives the City a more complete picture of what it takes to sustain a high-quality parks system.

Capital Costs

Capital cost estimates for all proposed park improvements were prepared by a professional cost estimator. These estimates provide a foundation for future budgeting and prioritization. Table 5.1 summarizes the estimated costs for each project.

Note: All estimates include allowances for bonds and insurance, general conditions, contractor overhead and profit, and a 30% design contingency to account for the conceptual nature of recommendations and the potential cost adjustments that may occur during detailed design and engineering. The design contingency will also likely cover any necessary ADA improvements that aren’t already addressed through the recommended improvements. ADA deficiencies are documented in the City’s 2022 Accessibility Report.

Escalation is not included and should be applied at the time of implementation.

Operations & Maintenance Costs

Maintaining parks and facilities in good condition is as important as building them. Some improvements—such as new restrooms or irrigated landscapes—will increase operational needs, while others—like low-water landscaping or upgraded infrastructure—can reduce costs over time. Table 5.1 indicates anticipated changes in operations and maintenance (O&M) costs associated with each project.

EFFICIENCY

Efficient project delivery helps the City make the most of every dollar invested and ensures that improvements are completed with minimal disruption to the community. Efficiency was intentionally built into the phasing framework in several ways:

• Coordinating improvements within the same park or area to minimize repeated disruption, protect completed site investments, and avoid unnecessary park closures.

• Leveraging economies of scale by bundling similar improvements—such as playground upgrades, lighting, or site furnishings— across multiple parks to reduce design and construction costs.

• Linking parks with shared characteristics (for example, Erckenbrack, Marlin, and Gull) into combined design or construction efforts to streamline project delivery.

These strategies ensure that improvements are implemented in a cost-effective, coordinated, and strategic manner, consistent with the prioritization framework and long-term resource planning.

SUMMARY OF PHASES

Phase I

Field Lighting at Catamaran Park

New Playgrounds at Gull, Sunfish, Shad

Planting & irrigation updates to deter geese & conserve water

Phase III

Improved waterfront at Gull

Paid/improved parking at Baywinds

Maintenance shed at Sea Cloud

Improved picnic facilities at Sea Cloud, Ryan, Gull, Baywinds

Phase II

All Abilities Play at Boothbay

New play area at Marlin

Walking loops at Edgewater & Sea Cloud

Planting & irrigation updates to deter geese & conserve water

Other Projects to be Considered

Estimated Cost: $22,568,000 Estimated Cost: $36,612,000

Walking loop at Sunfish

New Restroom at Port Royal, Erckenbrack

Sea Cloud II restoration/ development

Fitness Stations at Baywinds, Catamaran

New amenity at Shorebird

Improved waterfront/docking at Ryan, Erckenbrack, Catamaran, Sea Cloud

Planting & irrigation updates to deter geese & conserve water

Improved picnic facilities at Edgewater, Erckenbrack, Farragut, Ryan, Port Royal

Terrace seating, gateway harbor, water feature at Leo J. Ryan

Pathway lighting at most parks

Lagoon circulation fountains at Beach Parks

Note: Each phase includes a selection of representative project types. This is a partial list and not intended to reflect all projects within each phase. A full list of projects by phase can be found in Table 5.1

1. Shade Trees

2. Low-Water Use Planting, Irrigation Upgrade

3. Small shade structure, Comfort Amenity Improvements

Other Projects to Consider

1. Parking Lot Expansion, Parking Fee Station, Power Supply, Signage, Medium Shade Structure, Comfort Amenity Improvements

2. Fitness Station, Paid Washing Station, Lighting Improvements

Park

1. Low Water-Use Planting, Shade Trees, Irrigation Upgrade

2. Expanded Restroom, Comfort Amenity Improvements

1. Complete Walking Loop, Dispersed Picnic Sites, Low-Water Use / Geese Deterring Landscaping, Shade Trees, Irrigation Upgrade, Comfort Amenity Improvements

2. All Abilities Play, Additional Group Picnic Area, Improved Plaza/ Group Picnic Area, Renovated Volleyball Court

3. Pathway Lighting

Other Projects to Consider

(1) Positive O&M cost values indicate increased operating and maintenance expenses, while negative values reflect savings from reduced maintenance, conserved resources, or user and rental fee revenue.

I

Catamaran Park $5,674,900 $20,200

1. Field Lighting, Shade Trees, Low-Water Use / Geese Deterring Landscaping, Irrigation Upgrade.

$3,531,900 $1,100 Phase I

2. Medium Reservable Picnic Site with Shade Structure, Comfort Amenity Improvements $534,700

3. Improved Waterfront, Boat Dock

4. Fitness Station, Convert Tennis Courts to Multi-Use to Accommodate Pickleball

Edgewater Park $6,849,300 $54,000

1. Shade Trees, Low-Water Use / Geese Deterring Landscaping, Irrigation upgrades, Walking Loop / Improved Path Connectivity, Dispersed Picnic Areas, Comfort Amenity Improvements

$4,721,600

2. Central Gathering Place / Plaza, Reservable Picnic Area $569,400

3. Pathway Lighting, Pour-in-Place Playground Surfacing $1,558,300

Erckenbrack Park

1. Improved Group Picnic Area, Renovated Restroom, Shade Trees, Low-Water Use / Geese Deterring Landscaping, Irrigation Upgrade, Improved pathways, Dispersed Picnic Areas, Comfort Amenity Improvements, Improved Waterfront to Activate/Deter Geese, Small Boat Dock

2. Pathway Lighting, Lagoon Circulation Fountain

$4,665,500 $16,900

Other Projects to Consider

Other Projects to Consider

$4,086,000 $5,300 Phase III

$579,600 $11,600 Other Projects to Consider Farragut Park

$1,930,700 $5,300

1. Shade Trees, Comfort Amenity Improvements, Demonstration Garden

2. Small Shade Structure, Low-Water Use / Geese Deterring Landscaping, Irrigation Upgrade

$546,200 $6,300 Other Projects to Consider (1) Positive O&M cost values indicate increased operating and maintenance expenses, while negative values reflect savings from reduced maintenance, conserved resources, or user and rental fee revenue.

3. Pathway Lighting

Gateshead Park

1. Small Shade Structure, Wayfinding Signage, Comfort Amenity Improvements $142,900 $1,700 Phase III

2 Low-Water Use / Geese Deterring Landscaping, Irrigation Upgrade $155,700

Gull Park

$6,437,500 $18,300

Other Projects to Consider

1. Improved Group Picnic Area, New Thematic Playground, Renovated Restroom, Shade Trees, Low-Water Use / Geese Deterring Landscaping, Irrigation Upgrade, Dispersed Picnic Areas, Comfort Amenity Improvements. Improved Waterfront to Activate/Deter Geese, Small boat dock $5,857,400 $6,700 Phase I

2. Pathway Lighting, Lagoon Circulation Fountain $580,000 $11,600 Other Projects to Consider

Ketch Park $895,100 $3,700

1. Shade Trees, Comfort Amenity Improvements, Entry Sign Replacement

2. Low-Water Use / Geese Deterring Landscaping, Irrigation Upgrade, Small Shade Structure

I

3. Pathway Lighting $414,500 $4,800 Other Projects to Consider

Killdeer Park

$1,519,800 $900

1. Shade Trees, Comfort Amenity Improvements $93,200 $1,000 Phase I

2. Low-Water Use / Geese Deterring Landscaping, Irrigation Upgrade $922,600

3. Pathway Lighting

Projects to Consider

(1) Positive O&M cost values indicate increased operating and maintenance expenses, while negative values reflect savings from reduced maintenance, conserved resources, or user and rental fee revenue.

Leo J Ryan Park $18,742,000 $29,500

1. Shade Trees, Expanded Pickleball, Targeted Geese Deterrence Allowance, Improve Group Picnic Area with Shelter

$2,238,500 $9,900 Phase I

2. Low Water-Use / Geese Deterring Plantings, Nature Play Area, Dispersed Picnic Areas, Comfort Amenity Improvements, Irrigation Upgrade, Wayfinding Signage, Improved Boat Rentals and Docking $7,846,400

3. Water Terrace Seating, Gateway Harbor / Lagoon Water Feature, Additional Restroom (near The Vibe), Interactive Games/Art, Boardwalk Behind Stage, Pathway Lighting, String Lighting along Boardwalk

$8,657,100 $46,400 Other Projects to Consider Leo Park $168,900 -$1,100

1. Shade Trees, Low-Water Use Landscaping, Irrigation Upgrade

1. Improved Group Picnic Area, New Thematic Playground, Renovated Restroom, Shade Trees, Low-Water Use / Geese Deterring Landscaping, Irrigation Upgrade, Dispersed Picnic Areas, Comfort Amenity Improvements, Improved Waterfront to Activate/Deter Geese, Small boat dock

2. Pathway Lighting, Lagoon Circulation Fountain

$5,907,800 $6,700 Phase II

$580,100

1. Low-Water Use / Geese Deterring Landscaping, Shade Trees, Irrigation Upgrade, Comfort Amenity Improvements, Pathway $706,500 -$6,000 Phase III

(1) Positive O&M cost values indicate increased operating and maintenance expenses, while negative values reflect savings from reduced maintenance, conserved resources, or user and rental fee revenue.

1. Shade Trees

2. Low-Water Use / Geese Deterring Landscaping, Irrigation Upgrade, Seating Area Near Levee Pedway, Comfort Amenity Improvements, Wayfinding Signage, New Expanded Restroom, Small Shade Structure

3. Small Fitness Station, Ball Net, Pathway Lighting

1. New Maintenance Shed, Reservable Picnic Areas with Shade Structure

2. Low-Water Use / Geese Deterring Landscaping, Shade Trees, Irrigation Upgrade, Complete Walking Loop / Improved Circulation, Wayfinding Signage, Comfort Amenity Improvements

3. Improved Waterfront, Small Boat Dock

4. Sea Cloud II Improvements/Restoration, Upgraded Baseball Field, New Themed Playground, Plaza with New Snack Shack with Restrooms/Reservable Space/Storage. Field Lighting

I

I

$33,000 Other Projects to Consider Shad Park $1,807,700 $2,400

1. New Playground, Shade Trees, Comfort Amenity Improvements $608,000 $1,200

2. Low-Water Use / Geese Deterring Landscaping, Irrigation Upgrade,

3. Pathway Lighting

1. Comfort Amenity Improvements

2. Reprogram Central Area

I

$15,000 Other Projects to Consider

(1) Positive O&M cost values indicate increased operating and maintenance expenses, while negative values reflect savings from reduced maintenance, conserved resources, or user and rental fee revenue.

1. Shade Trees, Comfort Amenity Improvements, New Playground

2. Walking Loop, Dispersed Picnic Area with Small Shade Structure, Low-Water Use / Geese Deterring Landscaping, Irrigation Upgrade $1,194,500

3. Pathway Lighting

1. Shade Trees, Comfort Amenity Improvements

2. Low-Water Use / Geese Deterring Landscaping, Irrigation Upgrade

3. Pathway Lighting

Phase I

Phase III

Other Projects to Consider

Phase I

Phase III

-$5,200 Other Projects to Consider

(1) Positive O&M cost values indicate increased operating and maintenance expenses, while negative values reflect savings from reduced maintenance, conserved resources, or user and rental fee revenue.

Implementing System-wide Recommendations

Chapter 4: Guidelines, Policies, and Actions identifies a comprehensive set of recommendations that, taken together, will achieve the community’s vision for parks and recreation in Foster City. Many of these actions will be advanced through individual park improvements; however, several key recommendations—particularly those related to programs and events, operations and maintenance, and citywide initiatives—require dedicated focus.

TABLE 5.2 | System-Wide Recommendations

Table 5.2 presents an Action Plan for System-Wide Recommendations, including implementation phasing. As with the parkspecific projects, phasing reflects a balance of prioritization criteria and cost efficiency. In many cases, system-wide recommendations are indicated to be “ongoing” – they must be implemented consistently in the years ahead and are not tied to one phase.

Action 1.1.1: Increase park activation and identity by reprogramming underutilized park spaces with in-demand park amenities/experiences, referencing the park-specific improvements identified in the Parks Master Plan. see Table 5.1

Guideline 1: Foster City’s parks and recreation system is vibrant, comfortable and responsive.

Action 1.1.2: Incorporate innovative recreational features into parks, such as sensory gardens, interactive public art, destination play, and features for nighttime activation. see Table 5.1

Action 1.1.3: Expand passive amenities, such as walking trails, picnic areas, and natural open spaces. see Table 5.1

Action 1.1.4: Add lighting to key park amenities to allow for extended use into the evening.

Table 5.1

Action 1.1.5: Enhance park aesthetics through intentional design, periodic planning updates, and the use of high-quality furnishings and materials that align with the City’s brand identity. see Table 5.1

GUIDELINE ACTION

Action 1.2.1: Increase shade in parks by planting trees and/or constructing shade structures, particularly at playgrounds and picnic areas. see Table 5.1

Guideline 1:

Foster City’s parks and recreation system is vibrant, comfortable and responsive.

Action 1.2.2: Improve and/or expand restrooms in high-use parks, such as Leo J Ryan, Catamaran Park, Port Royal, and Sea Cloud.

Guideline 2:

Foster City has a connected and accessible parks and recreation system

Action 1.2.3: Add additional seating, drinking water, waste receptacles, and bike racks to parks where needed.

Action 1.2.4: Improve pathway lighting in parks to increase visibility at night. see Table 5.1

Action 1.3.1: Explore opportunities to expand access to indoor recreation and swimming facilities by pursuing or strengthening partnerships with San MateoFoster City School District and private recreation providers

Action 1.3.2: Complete the new community center and implement a programming plan that optimizes community use.

Action 1.3.3: Conduct a detailed study of the Sea Cloud 2 site to assess its environmental constraints and natural assets. Use these insights to create a master plan that balances ecological restoration with expanded recreational access and amenities.

Action 1.3.4: As opportunities arise, consider expanding Baywinds Park into adjacent public recreational and undeveloped lands to create a more integrated recreational and ecological destination with enhanced amenities and restored open space.

Ongoing

Phase I

Action 2.1.1: Create a connected network of paths and trails linking city parks, existing trails, and community destinations by working cross-departmentally to implement the Bike Pedestrian Master Plan 2026.

Phase I

Ongoing

Ongoing

Action 2.1.2: Provide complete walking loops or walking opportunities in parks. see Table 5.1

GUIDELINE ACTION PHASE

Action 2.1.3: Provide trailhead amenities, such as restrooms, water fountains, bike parking, signage, and seating areas, in parks adjacent to the Levee Pedway and other significant trails. see Table 5.1

Action 2.1.4: Create safe and comfortable pedestrian and bike crossings on major streets adjacent to parks and trails.

Action 2.1.5: Implement trail improvements on the Levee Pedway, such as paving treatments, distance markers, signage, and lighting, to create more comfortable conditions for all trail users.

Action 2.2.1: Develop a Park and Recreation Signage & Wayfinding Plan to establish clear and consistent signage across the park and recreation system.

Ongoing

Ongoing

Guideline 2:

Foster City has a connected and accessible parks and recreation system

Action 2.2.2: Increase the visibility of parks with limited street presence through wayfinding signage at nearby intersections and distinctive features at park entrances.

Action 2.2.3: Plan for multi-modal access to city parks, facilities, and events, establishing multimodal connections (i.e. trails, sidewalks, and bike lanes, etc.) and adequate parking for all modes of travel (i.e. vehicle, bike, watercraft, etc.)

Phase II

Phase II

Ongoing

Action 2.3.1: Strive for ADA-compliance at all parks, incorporating the improvements identified in the 2022 Accessibility Report within park improvement projects. see Table 5.1

Action 2.3.2: Incorporate universal design principles into park design, including amenities such as all-abilities play areas and accessible picnic areas. see Table 5.1

Action 2.3.3: Deliver programs, facilities, and communications that celebrate the City’s cultural and generational diversity, ensuring all residents feel welcome and included.

Ongoing

Guideline 3:

The Lagoon and Bay are active and well-integrated within the community

Action 3.1.1: Design parks along the Bay and lagoon to connect seamlessly with the water, providing opportunities to view, enjoy, and access it. see Table 5.1

Guideline 3:

The Lagoon and Bay are active and well-integrated within the community

Action 3.1.2: Provide watercraft docking opportunities at lagoon-adjacent parks, designed and sized to align with park purpose and function. see

Action 3.1.3: Implement the recommendations in the Leo J Ryan Boardwalk and Waterfront Master Plan, considering the additional recommended improvements in the Parks Master Plan.

Action 3.2.1: Collaborate across departments to implement the Lagoon Water Quality Management Plan and Canada Goose Population Management Plan to improve cleanliness of lagoon-adjacent parks and lagoon water quality.

Action 3.2.2: Support land use regulatory changes to encourage public access and activation along the lagoon as part of future development.

Ongoing

Phase I

Guideline 4:

Foster City has lively and inclusive events and programs

Action 3.2.3: Develop an interpretive water route along the lagoon that includes educational and wayfinding signage.

Action 3.2.4: Continue to support and expand lagoon-based community events (e.g., regattas, floating movie nights) to celebrate Foster City’s unique setting.

Action 3.2.5: Explore enhancements like lighting and water-based art to highlight and enliven the lagoon experience.

Action 4.1.1: Expand high priority programs, such as fitness and wellness, outdoor recreation, performing/visual arts, cultural enrichment, and programs for seniors.

Action 4.1.2: Survey residents to determine the best time offerings by core program area and adjust time offerings accordingly.

Phase II

Phase I

Phase II

Phase I

Phase I

Action 4.1.3: Establish a continuous program evaluation framework that uses participation metrics and community feedback to refine offerings. Ongoing

GUIDELINE ACTION PHASE

Action 4.2.1: Maintain support for the City's signature events, such as 4th of July and Summer Days Ongoing

Guideline 4:

Foster City has lively and inclusive events and programs

Policy 4.2.2: Cultivate small-scale, neighborhood events, such as pop-up concerts, cultural nights, or art-in-the-park series to supplement larger events. Ongoing

Action 4.2.3: Complement and connect with other recreation program providers and event sponsors, developing partnerships when advantageous. Ongoing

Action 5.1.1: Diversify plantings to increase biodiversity, lower water use, and add character to parks. see Table 5.1

Action 5.1.2: Create green corridors along existing and future trails to improve habitat continuity and increase public access to nature. Ongoing

Action 5.1.3: Expand conservation and restoration efforts at sites in and adjacent to Foster City parks and Bay shoreline. Ongoing

Guideline 5:

Foster City’s parks and programs are environmentally sustainable

Action 5.1.4: Provide educational opportunities and interpretation of the natural environment in programming, parks, and along trails. see Table 5.1

Action 5.2.1: Integrate stormwater management, such as bioswales and other nature-based strategies, for water infiltration into parks. see Table 5.1

Action 5.2.2: Conserve water in parks through turf conversion of non-active areas and through water-efficient irrigation systems. see Table 5.1

Action 5.2.3: Integrate eco-conscious strategies such as waste reduction, energy reduction, and water conservation into programming, events, and parks. Ongoing

GUIDELINE ACTION

Guideline 5: Foster City’s parks and programs are environmentally sustainable

Action 5.2.4: Ensure indoor recreation facilities function as cooling centers during days with heat advisories.

Ongoing

Guideline 6: Operational efficiency and economic feasibility are core to park and recreation management in Foster City.

Action 6.1.1: Develop a comprehensive maintenance management plan with defined outcomes and maintenance standards for each park.

Phase I

Action 6.1.2: Prioritize community maintenance priorities, focusing on pathways and trails, trash removal, restrooms, and landscape care. Phase I

Action 6.1.3: Upgrade maintenance practices for standard operations, such as integrating GIS-based data tools to manage weekly and monthly work orders.

Action 6.1.4: Ensure consistent parks maintenance by regularly reinvesting in existing vehicles and equipment and acquiring new assets as the park system expands.

Action 6.1.5: Increase staffing by 2.6 FTEs to effectively meet park operations and maintenance needs as indicated in the Park Maintenance Assessment (see the Appendix for Details).

Phase I

Ongoing

Phase I

Action 6.2.1: Adopt a standardized facility reservation and permit system that integrates online payments, scheduling, and real-time availability. Phase I

Action 6.2.2: Develop a partnership policy and use it as the foundation for updating existing partnership agreements. Phase I

Action 6.2.3: Develop an internal “Operations Performance Dashboard” to track Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) such as work order completion, customer response times, and satisfaction.

Action 6.2.4: Conduct routine operational assessments that assess staffing, service delivery, customer satisfaction, etc.

Phase I

Ongoing

GUIDELINE ACTION

Action 6.2.5: Prepare and implement a business and operations plan for the new community center, outlining funding, staffing, and management strategies to support successful activation and long-term facility performance.

Action 6.3.1: Adequately budget for recreation programming, park/facility maintenance, and lifecycle improvements to ensure consistent financial support for meeting accepted service levels.

Action 6.3.2: Establish a clear cost recovery policy for Foster City parks, facilities, programs and events.

Phase I

Ongoing

Phase I

Guideline 6: Operational efficiency and economic feasibility are core to park and recreation management in Foster City.

Action 6.3.3: Dedicate staff resources to develop funding strategies that support park improvements, maintenance, and recreation programming and events. Ongoing

Action 6.3.5: Establish a formal Parks and Recreation Sponsorship and Philanthropy Program to attract private, nonprofit, and business partnerships.

Phase I

Action 6.4.1: Annually review Master Plan policies and actions, making adjustments as needed, and consider a comprehensive update every 10–15 years. Ongoing

Action 6.4.2: Implement consistent community engagement—through surveys, town halls, focus groups, etc.—to gather input on evolving recreational needs and preferences. Ongoing

Action 6.4.3: Publish an annual “State of the Parks” report summarizing progress, funding, and performance metrics to promote transparency. Ongoing

Action 6.4.4: Develop a community advisory board or “Friends of Parks” group to assist with volunteer efforts and provide feedback on maintenance and capital priorities.

Phase I

Funding

Delivering the Master Plan vision will require significant investment and a diverse set of funding strategies. This chapter first outlines Foster City’s current funding practices, then highlights additional funding opportunities that can help sustain long-term investment.

CURRENT FUNDING FOR PARKS AND RECREATION

Foster City funds parks and recreation improvements through a diverse portfolio of restricted and unrestricted sources, with the largest and most consistent mechanisms being Park Facilities Impact Fees, Park-InLieu Fees, and the City’s Capital Investment Fund. Developer participation and targeted replacement funds fill critical gaps, especially for renewal and compliance projects. The structure reflects a financially conservative, growth-responsive strategy aligned with ongoing population and development cycles.

Current Funding Sources

GENERAL FUND

Capital Investment – City Fund (Fund 301)

Allows the City to invest in park and facility improvements using a combination of general capital funds, potential general obligation bond proceeds, and other eligible citywide capital sources. It includes a standing $2M emergency reserve. This is the City’s primary flexible capital source for major park system investments.

Equipment Replacement Fund (Fund 502)

This fund provides extra financial support to replace equipment and physical assets within the parks—things like turf, irrigation components, lighting, or other infrastructure that wears out over time. It is not the primary source of capital funding but serves as a secondary, strategic funding mechanism that helps cover replacement costs for park-related assets, especially when they’re part of larger park improvement projects.

Discretionary General Fund Transfers

The General Fund primarily supports day-today operations, but it can provide some capital funding when extra resources are available. However, because the City has limited discretionary funds—and must consider reserve policies and long-term budget pressures—this source typically plays a small or uncertain role in funding park capital projects.

DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTIONS

Park Facilities Impact Fee (Fund 142)

A dedicated growth-related revenue source used exclusively to fund improvements to parks, trails, and recreation facilities that are required to serve new development.

Park-In-Lieu Fees (Fund 104)

Collected from developers under state law when parkland dedication cannot be satisfied with physical land. Funds must be used for new improvements to local parks and recreation amenities that benefit the residents of new development. This fund is used for renovation, expansion, and construction of park facilities.

CAPITAL ASSET ACQUISITION

& REPLACEMENT FUND (FUND 326)

Funded by proceeds from the sale of Cityowned property. Assets can only be used for replacement of significant park or facility assets or major capital improvements, requiring a four-fifths City Council approval. Useful for large, one-time capital projects.

GRANTS & STATE FUNDING PROGRAMS (E.G., SB1, MEASURE A, MEASURE M, MEASURE

W)

While these sources are mainly transportationfocused, they can occasionally support multimodal infrastructure in or near parks—such as trail systems or bike/ped routes. They aren’t primary park capital funding sources but can help finance shared-use improvements adjacent to park areas.

SPECIAL REVENUE CONTRIBUTIONS VIA SUSTAINABILITY & HOUSING FUNDS

These funds aren’t specifically intended for park improvements, but programs like Sustainable Foster City can support broader environmental initiatives, and affordable housing fees may indirectly influence infrastructure planning. Overall, they serve only a secondary, occasional role in park-related funding.

FUNDING STRATEGIES TO CONSIDER

Foster City’s ability to sustain and improve its parks and recreation assets will depend on expanding its funding toolbox beyond traditional sources. The proposed park improvements—combined with rising maintenance costs—call for revenue mechanisms that are politically feasible, financially stable, and aligned with community expectations for high-quality park and recreation amenities.

TABLE 5.3 | Potential Funding Strategies

FUNDING STRATEGY

Landscape & Lighting Assessment District (LLAD)

Community Facilities District (CFD / MelloRoos)

Dedicated 1/81/4-Cent Local Sales Tax

Naming Rights & Corporate Sponsorships

Parks & Rec Foundation / 501 (c) (3)

CONCEPT & FUNDING POTENTIAL

Parcel-based charge for park upkeep ($50–$150 per parcel per year typical)

Special tax on new development and existing properties; could generate $8–$10M over 10 years

Estimated $500k–1M per year based on current taxable sales

Multi-year naming agreements for rooms, courts, amphitheater; typically $50k–$250k per space

Tax-deductible donations, planned giving, and endowment building; $2M+ potential

Grants

Competitive state, federal, and regional grant programs; potential for $500k–$5M depending on project type

The strategies outlined in Table 5.3 represent the most practical options for generating new, dedicated funding at scale. Each strengthens long-term operational sustainability, leverages Foster City’s strong tax base and corporate presence, and provides flexibility to support both ongoing maintenance and capital reinvestment.

Shares O&M costs across properties; ties cost to benefit received

Could help capture revenue from anticipated growth

Stable revenue stream; San Mateo County voters have supported past infrastructure sales taxes

Strong corporate presence (Visa, Gilead) with interest in community visibility

IMPLEMENTATION HURDLES

Requires majority approval from affected parcels

Requires nexus study and twothirds landowner approval

Requires simple-majority vote; community education is critical

Requires policy framework; bundle assets for higher value

Builds community support and taps long-term donors, alumni, retirees

Recommended projects are eligible for a wide range of park, recreation, and environmental grant programs

Needs seed funding (Council loan) and a board with strong community ties

Highly competitive; requires dedicated staff capacity and matching funds for most programs

Key Considerations

• A blended funding strategy is the strongest path forward. No single tool will close future funding gaps. The most effective approach combines voter-approved revenue with private and corporate contributions.

• Foster City benefits from a unique corporate landscape. Few communities have major employers like Visa and Gilead—companies that may be willing to support parks through naming rights, sponsorships, or partnership investments.

• Growth-related tools offer the quickest return. A Community Facilities District (CFD) ensures new development contributes to the infrastructure it depends on, generating revenue without shifting the burden onto existing taxpayers.

• Assessment districts create stable, predictable funding. An LLAD distributes costs across benefiting parcels and ties contributions to the value received.

• A local sales tax measure hinges on voter education. While the revenue potential is strong, success depends on clearly communicating how the funds will be used and why they are needed.

• Philanthropy should be built into the longterm funding model. A Parks and Recreation Foundation can provide lasting private support, but it requires start-up resources and strong leadership from the outset.

• Grant funding can supplement—but not replace—local revenue. State and federal grants can provide significant one-time boosts for parks, trails, and resilience projects, but they are competitive, unpredictable, and typically require matching funds. They work best when paired with stable local revenue sources.

BOND STRATEGIES

Foster City has several viable bonding tools available to support the next generation of parks and recreation projects. Each option carries different requirements, repayment sources, and levels of voter or Council approval. The City’s strong credit profile, history of successful bond measures, and disciplined financial management provide a solid foundation for future issuances.

Table 5.4 summarizes the available bonding tools, how they function, and what they can realistically support given Foster City’s current financial position and long-term needs.

TABLE 5.4 | Potential Bond Strategies

BOND TOOL WHAT IT PAYS FOR

General Obligation (GO) Bonds

Large, citywide projects with broad public benefit, such as major park improvements, shoreline protection, and resilience infrastructure.

Enterprise Revenue Bonds & Notes

REPAYMENT SOURCE & TERM

A dedicated property-tax levy over ~30 years.

VOTER/ COUNCIL THRESHOLD WHERE FOSTER CITY IS TODAY

Requires twothirds voter approval.

Voters have historically supported GO bonds, including the 2018 $90M levee measure.

CONSIDERATIONS FOR FUTURE PARK PROJECTS

Best suited for highly visible, citywide park investments; future measures must demonstrate broad benefit and remain within taxpayer tolerance.

LeaseRevenue Bonds / Certificates of Participation (COPs)

Special-tax / AssessmentBacked Bonds (LLAD / CFD / Mello-Roos)

Green / Climate / Social-Impact Bonds

Utility capital projects Repaid from system revenues (utility rates) over 30–40 years.

Civic and recreation facilities, park amenities, and equipment.

Park maintenance and capital improvements within defined benefit areas or new development.

Parks and infrastructure with environmental, climate resilience, or social-equity benefits.

Annual lease payments from the General Fund or another identified revenue source; 20–30-year terms.

Parcel charge (LLAD) or specialtax on new development (CFD); 25-30 years.

Same security as GO or revenue bonds; “green” designation broadens buyer interest.

Council approval only 2019 Wastewater Revenue Bonds ($34M EMID share) being refunded with $67M WIFIA loan. Not applicable for park improvements unless tied to a new self supporting recreation enterprise. No voter requirement, but constrained by ratepayer capacity.

Council approval COPs offer a flexible funding option but is tied to resolving the City’s structural deficit.

“LLAD: Majority property-owner approval

CFD: Two-thirds landowner approval”

Same as underlying bond

Preliminary analysis indicates both tools are viable if benefits are clearly defined.

Levee GO bonds already align with green financing criteria; labeling future bonds could lower interest costs.

Flexible tool for bundling multiple park and recreation projects into a single financing package, subject to long-term General Fund capacity.

Useful for targeted park improvements or operations without imposing citywide tax; requires clear benefit nexus and community support.

Enhances marketability, may reduce borrowing costs, and aligns well with resilience- and equityfocused park initiatives.

Key Considerations

• General Obligation bonds remain the most effective tool for large-scale investment in the City’s parks and recreation system Foster City has a strong voter track record with Measure P, but any future measure must demonstrate broad community benefit and remain within voter tolerance.

• Enterprise revenue bonds are not appropriate for parks. These bonds rely on water and wastewater rate revenue and should be used exclusively for utility infrastructure.

• Certificates of Participation offer the greatest flexibility. Foster City’s strong reserves and excellent credit rating support favorable borrowing rates, and COPs allow multiple park projects to be financed as a single package. Debt service on COPs is paid from the General Fund.

• Special-tax and assessment-backed bonds are well suited for targeted improvements. LLADs and CFDs can fund neighborhood parks, medians, and greenways without imposing citywide taxes, though success depends on clearly demonstrating benefit and confirming community support.

• Green or climate-linked bonds can enhance market appeal and reduce borrowing costs Environmental or socially focused labeling can attract ESG investors, especially for shoreline resilience, accessibility upgrades, and inclusive park projects.

ALIGNING SOURCES WITH RECOMMENDATIONS

Table 5.5 suggests potential primary funding sources for each park based on its recommended improvements, along with secondary options to help reduce pressure on the City’s capital program. It reflects a practical mix of tools—such as LLAD support, COP bundling, targeted grants, naming opportunities, and strategic use of bond capacity—to help Foster City phase improvements in a financially responsible manner.

The alignment also highlights where external funding can accelerate delivery, where bundling can improve efficiency, and where smaller site needs can be supported through lower-cost maintenance or landscape districts.

The funding sources shown in Table 5.5 are intended as suggestions of potential options. Before selecting any financing strategy, the City should conduct a thorough analysis of each source, evaluating its cost of capital, administrative burden, flexibility, and the equity considerations between payers and beneficiaries. This due diligence will ensure that the final funding approach is both fiscally responsible and aligned with community priorities.

TABLE 5.5 | Potential Funding Sources for Capital Projects by Park

PROJECT (PARK)

Arcturus Park

Baywinds Park

Boat/Dog Park

Boothbay Park

Bridgeview Park

Catamaran Park

Edgewater Park

Erckenbrack Park

Farragut Park

Gateshead Park

Gull Park

Ketch Park

Killdeer Park

Leo J. Ryan Park

Leo Park

Marlin Park

Pompano Park

Port Royal Park

Sea Cloud Park

Shad Park

Shorebird Park

Sunfish Park

Turnstone Park

CAPITAL COSTS PRIMARY FUND

$359,200

$1,936,400

$1,125,400

$12,222,400

$157,500

$5,674,900

$6,849,300

$4,665,500

$1,930,700

$298,600

$6,437,500

$895,100

$1,519,800

$18,742,000

$168,900

$6,487,900

$706,500

$2,496,500

$28,085,900

$1,807,700

$2,801,000

$2,624,400

$999,100

/ OTHER FUNDING SOURCES

General Fund (CIP) or GO Bond LLAD for irrigation/landscape;

General Fund (CIP) or GO Bond

General Fund (COP bundling with Catamaran/Marlin/ Edgewater)

General Fund (CIP) or GO Bond LLAD for landscape/O&M; sponsorship for dog-area amenities

General Fund (CIP) or GO Bond

General Fund (COP grouping); LWCF for play areas and nature features; Sustainability Grants

General Fund (CIP) or GO Bond LLAD or minor landscape maintenance allocation

General Fund (CIP) or GO Bond

General Fund (COP grouping with Sea Cloud/Marlin); naming rights for courts; Sustainability Grants

General Fund (CIP) or GO Bond Safe Streets for All/LWCF; Urban Greening for shade/ plantings; Sustainability Grants

General Fund (CIP) or GO Bond

General Fund (COP grouping); LLAD for irrigation/ landscape; Sustainability Grants

General Fund (CIP) or GO Bond LLAD; Sustainability Grants

General Fund (CIP) or GO Bond LLAD; minimal sponsorship potential

General Fund (CIP) or GO Bond

General Fund (COP grouping); LWCF for playground; Sustainability Grants

General Fund (CIP) or GO Bond LLAD

General Fund (CIP) or GO Bond LLAD; Urban Greening for shade/plantings

General Fund (CIP) or GO Bond

Naming rights (boardwalk/amphitheater); state waterfront access grants; Sustainability Grants

General Fund (CIP) or GO Bond Urban Greening for shade/plantings

General Fund (CIP) or GO Bond

General Fund (COP grouping); LWCF playground grant; Sustainability Grants

General Fund (CIP) or GO Bond LLAD

General Fund (CIP) or GO Bond

General Fund (CIP) or GO Bond

General Fund (COP grouping); minor sponsorship opportunities

GO Bond consideration (Phase II); CFD for athletic field O&M; Sustainability Grants

General Fund (CIP) or GO Bond LLAD

General Fund (CIP) or GO Bond

General Fund (COP grouping); grant for central area reprogramming

General Fund (CIP) or GO Bond LLAD; Urban Greening; state SPP grant; Sustainability Grants

General Fund (CIP) or GO Bond LLAD

Key Considerations

• Only broadly applicable sources for each park are listed. Many of the funding tools outlined in earlier sections may also be applicable depending on project specifics.

• Many mid-range projects could advance more efficiently through COP bundling. Parks such as Baywinds, Edgewater, Erckenbrack, Marlin, and Gull share similar cost profiles and infrastructure needs, making them strong candidates for combined financing.

• LLADs remain the most consistent secondary tool for smaller parks. Irrigation, landscaping, and routine maintenance in parks such as Arcturus, Bridgeview, Farragut, Gateshead, Ketch, Killdeer, Shad, Sunfish, and Turnstone can be partially offset with LLAD revenue, easing long-term operating pressure.

• Grant eligibility is strong for nature play, shade, waterfront, and sustainability features. Programs such as Prop 68, Land and Water Conservation Fund, Urban Greening, and Statewide Park Development and Community Revitalization Program (SPP) can support elements in Sea Cloud, Boothbay, Edgewater, Gull, Marlin, Erckenbrack, and Leo J. Ryan—especially where improvements enhance access, visibility, natural features, or tree canopy.

• High-cost signature parks require broader financing tools. Leo J. Ryan Park and Sea Cloud Park represent large capital commitments that may require COPs, GO bonds, or CFD participation to support athletic field upgrades and major public amenities.

• Sponsorships and naming rights offer targeted revenue opportunities. Assets at Sea Cloud, Dog Park, Leo J. Ryan (boardwalk/amphitheater), and Port Royal can attract corporate support and create non-tax revenue.

• Smaller “quick win” projects can proceed with CIP funding alone. Improvements at Bridgeview, Leo, Gateshead, and Arcturus have modest budgets and can move forward early with minimal dependence on secondary funding.

Call to Action

The Foster City Parks Master Plan represents a shared vision for the future — one built on community values, stewardship, and the belief that great parks and recreation strengthens both people and place. This Plan sets a clear roadmap for reinvestment, equity, and sustainability across the City’s parks and open spaces. But plans only come to life through ongoing commitment. Implementation will require partnership among City leaders, staff, and the community to prioritize projects, pursue funding, and steward resources wisely. As Foster City continues to evolve, so too must its parks. The next steps — from small-scale improvements to major investments — are opportunities to renew, adapt, and reimagine the City’s beloved public spaces, events, and programs for generations to come. By working together, the City and its residents can ensure that every park remains a vibrant, welcoming, and resilient place that reflects the community’s values and aspirations for the future.