The independent newspaper of Washington University in St. Louis since 1878 THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2024
VOLUME 146, NO. 10
WWW.STUDLIFE.COM
WashU heads to the polls
448 voters were surveyed after casting their ballot. These are their responses:
91%
Voted yes on Amendment 3 to repeal the abortion ban
6%
Voted no on Amendment 3 to repeal the abortion ban
46 %
Voted yes on Amendment 2 to legalize sports gambling
47%
BRI NITSBERG AND SAM POWERS | MANAGING PHOTO EDITOR AND JUNIOR PHOTO EDITOR
WashU reckons with re-election NINA LASER ALIZA LUBITZ ALIANA MEDIRATTA NEWS EDITORS MANAGING NEWS EDITOR
After president-elect Donald Trump secured a decisive victory in the presidential election on Tuesday night, many WashU students came to campus the next day grappling with the news and processing a wide range of emotions. For some, Wednesday was a celebration of a strong showing by Trump. But for many students on WashU’s predominantly Democratic campus, the day was marked by sadness, fear, and uncertainty about the future of the country. Katie Pope — a senior from California studying Psychology, Spanish, and Marketing — said she felt devastated by the election results. “I actually went to bed early hoping I’d wake up for good news, because I just couldn’t handle it,” Pope said. “I woke up, and it was definitely not what I’d hoped for. It definitely gave me a pit in my stomach.” Senior David Cui — a Computer Science and Math major from California — voted for Donald Trump, in alignment with his parents’ political preferences. He noted that his parents had examined each candidates’ policies more thoroughly than he had, and they ultimately decided that Trump’s policies would be better for their family. “My dad’s a businessman and he used to be a rice farmer in China. Some of the policies that Kamala was fighting for would really devastate my dad’s business,” he said. He also noted that if he was financially independent, he likely would have voted for whichever candidate benefited his financial interests, while also weighing issues like environmental policy, gun control, and education. Cui said he felt mostly indifferent upon hearing of the election results this morning. “I feel a little more pleased that I think the new president can hopefully improve our nation,” he said. “I don’t know. We’ll see.” Senior Elie Weitzman, a Political Science and History major from New York, was surprised that Donald Trump won the election by such a large margin. “Watching all the early results come in and see Michigan and Pennsylvania swinging far more red than I thought they were gonna be was jarring,” Weitzman said. “I felt
probably an irrational level of optimism going in [to election night].” Although the final vote count has not been reported yet, as of Wednesday night, Trump has over 72 million votes compared to Vice President Kamala Harris’ 68 million, per the New York Times. Polling data prior to the election showed Trump and Harris in a dead heat. Senior Ethan Holz said the election results showed him that living in a largely Democratic area had limited his perception of American politics. “My reaction is like, wow, I have such little understanding of so many people,” Holz said. “Because I was just like, how is Donald Trump winning? I’m living in some sort of bubble where I can’t relate to so many people, and I just feel bad about that.” Throughout the day, Holz found himself enjoying class discussions that feel like a departure from the doom and gloom that has permeated campus. “Something externally is happening in the world, [but] there’s still so many things that I can do that affect my well being and how I feel,” Holz said. “It sucks. But it happened, it is the reality, and I’m not really willing to walk around sullen for days or weeks.” Senior Aarav Dubey, who is originally from India but has also lived in California and Georgia, said he did not vote because he didn’t want to support any candidate who “supports the cruelties occuring in Palestine.” Dubey also expressed frustration with the Electoral College. “The system feels unfair because unless you’re in a swing state, your influence on policy is severely compromised,” he said. Similar to Holz, Dubey was struck by just how differently people viewed the outcome of the election. “Some people think this means the end of the world, and some people think that democracy just got saved,” Dubey said. Dubey said that following the 2016 election he “gave up on politics” and that he does not feel extremely impacted by the outcome of the 2024 election. “I feel a little bad because people seem very influenced by it, so clearly it matters,” Dubey said. “I just think we overestimate how much influence we have on national politics and underestimate the huge impact we can have on the people around us locally, just by being a nice person and being in tune with local causes. So I think we should focus on little
steps like that.” In response to student reactions, some professors made the decision to cancel classes to give students the space to process their varied reactions to the election outcome. Lucas Drummond, a lecturer at the Sam Fox School, knew he wanted to cancel his Wednesday class, no matter the outcome. “I canceled my class prior to the election last week, knowing that regardless of the result it would be a valuable time for space and reflection,” Drummond wrote. Professor of Biological Anthropology David Strait, who teaches Human Evolution, made his class optional and uploaded his lecture in advance. “My reasoning was simply that I knew that elections can be stressful and also that some students would want to stay up late to watch the returns,” Strait wrote. “I told students about the video before we knew who the winner was.” After an emotional night watching the election results roll in, Wolfram Schmidgen, a professor of English, found himself asking if he should teach class. “This morning I thought, am I going to even go in? I mean, am I going to teach?” Schmidgen said. “But I felt like it would actually be more important for me to be there with [students] to talk about this, rather than stay away and avoid conversation.” Schmidgen led a conversation in class to connect the outcome of the election to literature. He remembers other times in his career when he made similar decisions to bring current events into the fold rather than shy away from them. “I remember teaching a Jane Austen class and it was the day that we attacked Iraq,” he said. “I felt that day too that I couldn’t just teach Jane Austen, so I walked in and actually talked about war and whether Jane Austen is, in fact, a kind of escape from that.” Going into class on Wednesday, Schmidgen admitted that he was nervous because the election is a sensitive topic, acknowledging that there may have been Trump voters in the room. “I also didn’t know whether there would be willingness among students to take the courageous step to actually talk about it,” he said, noting that students actively participated in the conversation. “I was surprised by how emotional I was, but I just wanted to open it up.”
Voted no on Amendment 2 to legalize sports gambling
Exit Poll: Campus voters support Democrats and abortion rights RILEY HERRON IAN HEFT MANAGING SPORTS EDITOR SENIOR SPORTS EDITOR
In an exit poll conducted by Student Life, 448 voters at the WashU Athletic Complex overwhelmingly supported Democrats, including Kamala Harris for President, Lucas Kunce for Senate, and Wesley Bell for the House of Representatives. Abortion was a key issue for a majority of voters, and more than 90% of respondents supported Amendment 3, which would enshrine reproductive rights in the state’s constitution. However, respondents were split on Amendment 2, which would legalize sports gambling. For 13 hours on Tuesday, Nov. 5, Student Life surveyed 448 voters after they voted in the 2024 general election. According to Stephanie Kurtzman — Executive Director of the Gephardt Institute for Civic and Community Engagement — 1,600 voters cast their ballots or provisional ballots at the Athletic Complex, an increase from 949 in 2022 and 1,156 in 2020. 85.5% of the poll’s respondents were WashU students. Survey respondents were majority female (64.7% female, 32.9% male). 67.3% of respondents were white, 22.6% were Asian, 11% were Hispanic, and 9.6% were Black. 74.7% of respondents identified as Democrats, while 16.6% said they were Independents, and 5.6% identified as Republicans. 88.8% of voters voted for Harris, 6.7% voted for Donald Trump, and 2% voted for Green Party candidate Jill Stein. 89.5% voted for Democrat Lucas Kunce over Republican incumbent Josh Hawley for Senate, 87.2% of respondents picked Democrat Crystal Quade over Republican Mike Kehoe for Governor, and 86.8% picked Democrat Elad Gross over Republican incumbent Andrew Bailey for Attorney General. The Associated Press called the presidential election for Donald Trump on Wednesday afternoon. Democrats Kunce, Quade and Gross also lost their elections. 82.6% of respondents preferred Democrat Wesley Bell in the race
CONTACT BY POST
CONTACT BY EMAIL
CONTACT BY PHONE
ONE BROOKINGS DRIVE #1039 #320 DANFORTH UNIVERSITY CENTER ST. LOUIS, MO 63130-4899
EDITOR@STUDLIFE.COM NEWS@STUDLIFE.COM CALENDAR@STUDLIFE.COM
NEWSROOM 314.935.5995 ADVERTISING 314.935.4240 FAX 314.935.5938
for the House, while 7.6% picked Republican Andrew Jones Jr., and 3.1% picked Don Fitz of the Green Party. The Associated Press called the race for Bell on Wednesday. Missouri’s election has also received attention for its amendments and propositions. Amendment 3 is overwhelmingly popular among respondents, as 91.3% said they voted yes, and it passed with Missouri voters. Abortion was deemed the most impactful issue, with 50.8% of respondents selecting it as the issue they cared most about. Other important issues were healthcare (9.4%), the economy (8.9%), racial and ethnic equality (6.7%), and climate change (4.9%). While respondents overwhelmingly voted for Amendment 3, they were split on Amendment 2, voting slightly in opposition to legalizing sports gambling. 46.1% of voters voted to legalize sports gambling in the state, 47% voted against the amendment, and 6.9% abstained from voting on the amendment. As of Wednesday night, the Associated Press has not called this race. A majority of respondents also indicated that they would vote “No” on Amendments 6 and 7. 69.4% said they would vote “No” on Amendment 6, which would authorize usage of court fees for salaries and pensions of law enforcement personnel. Opponents of Amendment 6 say it would create a set of incentives that tie pensions to the number of arrests and prosecutions made. 72% of respondents chose “No” on Amendment 7, which would prohibit ranked-choice voting or approval voting in the state of Missouri. In addition, the amendment would explicitly prohibit non-citizens from voting in Missouri elections, something that is already prohibited by state law. Amendment 6 failed, while Amendment 7 passed. Respondents overwhelmingly voted “Yes” on Proposition A, which would increase Missouri’s minimum wage to $15/hour by 2026 if passed. It would also require employers to provide one hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours worked, and was passed by Missouri voters.