Skip to main content

Peer Review Resume Rubric

Page 1

Peer Review Resume Rubric Student Name: ____________________

Peer Evaluator: ______________________

Date: _______________

Excellent

Good

Developing

Needs Improvement

▪ 1 page in length with balanced margins (.5”-1”) with eye appeal – fills the page but is not overcrowded ▪ Format highlights strengths and information and is very easy to scan ▪ Professional font style used with 10-12 point size for bulk text

▪ 1 page in length with balanced margins (.5”-1”) – almost fills page but some uneven white space ▪ Format identifies strengths and information and is easy to scan ▪ Appropriate fonts and point size used

▪ Length not appropriate with unbalanced margins – major problems with white space or overcrowding ▪ Format does not identify strengths and information and is difficult to scan ▪ Font style or size detracts from readability

HEADING

▪ Includes: name, phone, e-mail, and address ▪ Name clearly stands out from other text ▪ Design is exceptionally clean and attractive

▪ Includes: name, phone, e-mail, and address ▪ Name somewhat stands out from other text ▪ Design is clean and attractive

▪ Slightly under or over 1 page in length with somewhat balanced margins – some white space or overcrowding issues ▪ Format is starting to identify strengths and information with some difficulties scanning ▪ Font style or size is slightly distracting from readability and content ▪ Missing 1 of: name, phone, e-mail, and address ▪ Name does not stand out from other text ▪ Design is not focused or unattractive

CONTENT & LANGUAGE

▪ All action verb phrases used to describe duties and skills ▪ Content demonstrates successes and clear transferability of skills to perform the job ▪ Professional terminology used when describing skills

▪ 1-2 duties/skills lack action verb phrases ▪ Content demonstrates transferability of skills to perform the job ▪ Some professional terminology used when describing skills

▪ 3-4 duties/skills lack action verb phrases ▪ Some content demonstrates ability to perform the job ▪ Some unprofessional or colloquial language used

▪ 5+ duties/skills lack action verb phrases ▪ Content does not clearly demonstrate ability to perform the job or lacks professional tone

▪ Heading, experience, education, skills, and more covered in detail ▪ Sections are ordered by highest relevancy ▪ Each section consistently organized (your title, place of work, location, dates) and purposefully titled

▪ Heading, experience, education, and skills covered in some detail ▪ Sections are ordered logically ▪ Sections are consistently organized and acceptably titled

▪ Heading, experience, education, and skills covered with little detail ▪ Sections are well developed but lack intentional order (or vice versa)

▪ Missing one of the following: heading, experience, education, or skills ▪ Sections lack intentional ordering and/or are underdeveloped

▪ No spelling errors ▪ No grammar or punctuation errors

▪ 1-2 spelling errors ▪ 1-2 grammar or punctuation errors

▪ 1-2 spelling errors ▪ 3-4 grammar or punctuation errors

▪ 3+ spelling errors ▪ Multiple grammar or punctuation errors

FORMAT

ORGANIZATION & SECTIONS

SPELLING, GRAMMAR, & PUNCTUATION

▪ Missing 2+ of: name, phone, e-mail, and address ▪ Name does not stand out from other text Design is not focused or unattractive

Comments: ___________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Peer Review Resume Rubric by The University of Idaho - Issuu