Issuu

Plan 630: Advanced Professional Planning Studio

HEART OF THE NORTH: NEIGHBOURHOOD DESIGN CONCEPTS FOR THORNCLIFFEGREENVIEW AND NORTH HAVEN

ACKN OWLEDGMENTS PROJECT TEAM Matthew Comfort | BBA, MPlan Emily Eremenko | BA, MPlan Catherine Norman | BA, MPlan Noah Seeton | BA, MPlan

PROJECT MANAGER Francisco Alaniz Uribe | Associate Professor, University of Calgary

STEERING COMMITTEE Alison Abbott | Thorncliffe Community Association Patrick Saunders | Thorncliffe Community Association Stacey McDade | Thorncliffe Community Association Celine Baharally | North Haven Community Association Meritt Kularatne | North Haven Community Association Karen Boudeweyn | North Haven Community Association Nathan Stelfox | CivicWorks Scott Thomson | City of Calgary Afrah Reyes | Federation of Calgary Communities

LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT

In the spirit of respect, reciprocity and truth, team at Sonder honours and acknowledges Moh’kinsstis, and the traditional Treaty 7 territory and oral practices of the Blackfoot confederacy: Siksika, Kainai, Piikani, as well as the Îyâxe Nakoda and Tsuut’ina nations. We acknowledge that this territory is home to the Métis Nation of Alberta, Region 3 within the historical Northwest Métis homeland. Finally, we acknowledge all Nations – Indigenous and non – who live, work and play on this land, and who honour and celebrate this territory.

Img: Priscilla Du Preez

TABL E OF CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary

2.0 Introduction

2.1 Project Team

2.2 The Site

2.3 Methodology & Project Design

2.4 Focus Areas

3.0 Community Engagement: Workshop

3.1 What We Heard

3.2 Guiding Principles

4.0 Community Analysis

4.1 Census & Demographics

4.2 Historical Analysis

4.3 Urban Morphology

4.4 Urban Morphology Analysis Summary

4.5 Built Form

4.6 Built Form Analysis Summary

4.7 Natural Features

4.8 Open Space Typologies & Access

4.9 Winter Considerations

4.10 Climatic Factors

4.11 Open Space Analysis Summary

4.12 Mobility

4.13 Mobility & Morphology Analysis Summary

5.0 Concepts: Housing

5.1 Overview

5.2 Centre Street TOD - Thorncliffe Connect

5.3 Corner & Corridor Connections

5.4 Contiuum Living

6.0 Concepts: Other Land Use

6.1 Overview

6.2 Church Redevelopment - Stregthening From the Heart

6.3 Partnerships in Underutilized Spaces

6.4 Commercial Hub Development

6.5 Strip Mall Design Guidelines

6.6 Build Around Existing Assets

7.0 Concepts: Open Space

7.1 Urban Ecosystem

7.2 Parks for All

7.3 Community Confluence

7.4 Trafford Creek & Egerts Park Concept

103

8.0 Concepts: Mobility

112

8.1 Objectives

113

8.2 Overview

114

8.3 From East to West

115

8.4 Safety Through Traffic Calming

116

8.5 Pathways to Destinations

120

8.6 48th Ave @ Noth Haven Dr Traffic Calming

122

8.7 Thorncliffe School Traffic Calming

123

8.8 John Laurie @ McKnight Intervention

125

8.9 John Laurie Bus Stop

126

8.9.1 Mobility Summary

128

9.0 Public Engagment: Open House 9.1 What We Heard

129 129

10.0 Conclusions

131

11.0 References

132

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY North Haven and Thorncliffe/Greenview are established residential communities in Calgary, originally developed in the 1960’s and 70’s as models of the ideal Canadian suburb. Decades later, these neighbourhoods find themselves at a critical juncture in their life cycle. Aging building stock in need of replacement, a declining population, and stagnant growth projections have left them at risk of being bypassed by the wave of development reshaping the broader city. While Calgary's population continues to expand outward on the fringe of the city, it is projected that North Haven and Thorncliffe/Greenview will see little to no population growth in the coming years (2021). The consequences of this are already visible. Major roads and transit corridors running through these communities are increasingly congested, carrying commuters to and from the city's expanding periphery, with few stopping to invest in or connect with the neighbourhoods themselves. These communities are becoming a corridor rather than a destination. Compounding these challenges, neither North Haven nor Thorncliffe/Greenview is currently guided by an Area Redevelopment Plan or a Local Area Plan, leaving them without a policy framework to proactively shape and manage change. The central challenge this project addresses is how North Haven and Thorncliffe/Greenview can be repositioned to absorb a share of Calgary's growth in a way that respects and preserves their existing neighbourhood character. There is a genuine and exciting opportunity for these communities to become an active part of Calgary's future. Creating vibrant, walkable, and welcoming places where people choose to live, rather than simply pass through. This document is a comprehensive account of the work completed by Sonder Consultants for North Haven and Thorncliffe/Greenview, encompassing site analysis, public engagement, precedent studies, and draft design concepts, culminating in a set of specific design interventions to guide future growth. Our work is organized across four focus areas: Housing, Other Land Use, Open Space, and Mobility. Throughout this process, our work has been guided by what we heard during our public engagement and our four core principles, Diverse, Inclusive, Connected, and Adaptable, which together form the foundation for a resilient and revitalized vision for these communities. The people of North Haven and Thorncliffe/Greenview have the opportunity to shape what comes next, and the strategies and interventions outlined in this document are intended to serve as both a resource and a roadmap for that transformation.

2.0 INTRODUCTION This document responds to Thorncliffe-Greenview and North Haven’s request for Neighbourhood Design Concepts. We are excited by the notion of working with these established communities to help them grow and develop in a way that respects their character, history, and connection to some of Calgary's most cherished outdoor spaces. This is an academic project completed for Advanced Professional Planning Studio (PLAN 630) at the School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape. This document provides the Community Associations with recommendations, strategies and design interventions.

2.1 PROJECT TEAM At Sonder, we put people and the places they live first. We value connecting homes to nature, creating an inviting sense of place, and hearing the voices of the community. Through data-driven decision making, clear communication, and accessible data visualization, we translate complex information into meaningful insights that guide sustainable, environmentally resilient outcomes. Using effective engagement, collaboration, and data-grounded decision-making we help communities grow in ways that are connected, adaptable, and deeply rooted in local context. Coined by John Koenig, the word sonder describes the profound realization that every person around you has a detailed life filled with stories and struggles just like you. This concept represents the approach we take to planning by understanding that every single person experiences the world differently, and every person's story unfolds through the fabric of our communities every day. Our concepts and designs consider the multiple livelihoods that will experience the spaces we create, with the aim of bringing joy to every individual story. “The feeling one has on realizing that every other individual one sees has a life as full and real as one’s own, in which they are the central character and others, including oneself, have secondary or insignificant roles.” - Dictionary.com

MATT COMFORT | BBA, MPLAN 2026 Matthew Comfort is a second-year planning student with an interest in equitable land use, affordable housing, and transportation planning. Prior to his current work, he gained professional and academic experience as a Research Assistant at the University of Calgary, where he contributed to research focused on identifying and advancing affordable housing solutions in a rapidly growing metropolitan context. He also spent a semester abroad at ETH Zurich, studying public life and public space, which strengthened his understanding of how high-quality urban design, mobility, and land use policy can work together to support inclusive, people-centred cities. Matthew’s planning interests centre on equitable transit-oriented developments and the creation of high-quality public spaces that serve diverse communities. His approach combines research, policy analysis, and on-theground insight to help translate equity goals into practical, implementable planning outcomes. Beyond planning, Matthew can be found cycling, cross-country skiing, or travelling, often drawing inspiration from cities and landscapes around the world. EMILY EREMENKO | BA, MPLAN 2026 Emily Eremenko is a second-year planning student with an interest in development and municipal planning policy. She has worked as a Planning and Development Assistant with the Municipal District of Willow Creek, supporting Land Use Bylaw updates, development permit review, and stakeholder coordination. Academically, Emily participated in the Sustainable Urban Development Field School at the University of Victoria, where she engaged with planning professionals across seven European countries and delivered six weekly presentations and analyses on sustainable development practices. She also co-created a community education event focused on raising awareness of the importance of pollinator corridors in urban environments. Emily’s work reflects her passion for sustainability and curiosity of how people and communities engage with and learn from their environment. Utilizing her strong analytical mindset, technical skillset, and planning and design frameworks she is motivated to support the development of resilient, connected, and complete communities. Beyond planning, Emily spends her time snowboarding, golfing, and exploring niche pockets of urban life around the world.

CATHERINE NORMAN | BA HONS, MPLAN 2026 Catherine is a second-year planning student with an interest in the relationships between urban and natural environments. She has experience working for the City of Calgary as a planner in Community Energy, a Research Assistant at Vancouver Island University regarding a complicated Land Acquisition, and as a Park Ambassador for B.C. Parks Foundation. Her experience includes a number of proven projects, the most relevant being the Campbellton Neighbourhood Action Plan which was implemented by the Neighbourhood Association in 2022. In addition to her practical experience, Catherine is dedicated to continually disseminating her research about planning for wildlife within cities. Her Geography Honours Thesis, titled Moving Beyond Human Exceptionalism to Plan for More-than-Human Cities examines the current role of nature and wildlife within community planning, and how we can improve it. Catherine’s combination of research and practical knowledge allows for opportunity to explore how unique ideas can come to life on the ground. Beyond planning Catherine can be found hiking with her dog, playing board games, or doing aerial sports. NOAH SEETON | BA, EPT, MPLAN 2026 Noah is a second-year planning student with an interest in accessible and inclusive spaces, transportation, and bylaw planning. Previously he worked as a survey assistant and materials tester at Allnorth Consultants and currently works as a freelance consultant at Upwork. He serves as the Vice President of Finance and Operations for the School of Architecture, Planning, and Landscape Student Association (SAPL SA). Noah’s methodology includes conducting environmental due diligence checks, ensuring code compliance, utilizing Indigenous and alternative ways of knowing to ensure spaces are places for everyone. When he’s not working as a planner, he enjoys spending his time mountain biking, reading, and playing / writing music.

2.2 THE SITE As neighbouring communities, Thorncliffe - Greenview and North Haven share many geographic and urban features. The communities are in the heart of the north of Calgary and are only a 15-minute drive, 20 minutes by transit, to major activity centers like downtown and the Calgary International Airport (YYC). They are both in the stage of their life cycles where the population is growing older and the next generation is ready to move in. There has been a large amount of redevelopment in the older communities closer to the city's core, which means that they both need to prepare for the wave of redevelopment to enter their boundaries in the coming years.

KEY MAP CONTEXT NW

64 Ave NE

NORTH HAVEN

Nose Creek

UPPER NORTH HAVEN

E ot Trl N Deerfo

THORNCLIFFE

Nose Hill Park

14 St NW

4S tN E

4 St NW

Huntington Hills

Skyline West McKnight Blvd NW

GR EE NV IEW

Highwood

Greenview Industrial Park

Highland Park Edmonton Trl

Queens Park Village

Centre St N

Cambrian Heights

Av eN E

Calgary Int’l Airport ~9 min

PROXIMITY TO REGIONAL DESTINATIONS

NOSE HILL PARK

Banff ~ 1 hr 3 0 m in

UPPER NORTH HAVEN

FE THORNCLIF GREENVIEW

NORTH HAVEN

UofC Campus ~ 1 1 mi n

Downtown ~1 2 min

2.3 METHODOLOGY & PROJECT DESIGN The methodology for this project follows a six-phase process grounded in rigorous data research and meaningful community engagement. The first phase begins with a comprehensive neighbourhood analysis, drawing on spatial data collection and demographic research to build a thorough understanding of the existing conditions, patterns, and needs within the study area. This foundation informs every subsequent design decision and ensures that proposals are rooted in evidence rather than assumption. Community engagement forms the heart of the second phase, bringing together interested parties through structured workshops and site visits. These sessions create space for local knowledge to surface, ensuring that the voices of those who live and work in the neighbourhood directly shape the direction of the project. Building on this input, the third phase moves into draft design concepts, where interventions are developed and ideas are tested through an iterative ideation process. Preliminary concepts are then presented to the steering committee for review, critique, and refinement. The fourth phase focused on building a physical three-dimensional model, giving interested parties a tangible representation of the current built form to help visualize the current and proposed spatial relationships. This leads into the fifth phase, an Open House, which provides the final opportunity for the broader community to engage with the designs, offer input, and ensure the proposals truly reflect collective priorities. In the sixth and final phase, all feedback gathered throughout the process is carefully incorporated into the finished designs, and comprehensive reports are compiled and submitted to the communities, delivering a transparent and accountable record of the entire project journey.

METHODOLOGY

NEIGHBOURHOOOD ANALYSIS Workshop Site visits

3 DRAFT DESIGN CONCEPTS

Spatial data Demographics research

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

Interventions & ideation Present to steering committee

3D built form

OPEN HOUSE

PHYSICAL MODEL

Last incorporation of community feedback

Incorporate feedback into final designs Submit the reports to the communities

FINAL REPORTS

2.4 FOCUS AREAS This report will cover analysis, strategies and interventions for our four focus areas:

HOUSING

OTHER LAND USE

OPEN SPACE

MOBILITY

3.0 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT: WORKSHOP To begin our public engagement we first did site visits with members of the community association, which we greatly appreciate. Their insight was essential to kickoff our research. After becoming acquainted with the data, we ran a community workshop at the Thorncliffe Community Association where we asked questions about constraints, issues and challenges as well as ones about assets and opportunities. We had maps on the tables to make pointing, circling and labelling easy. We did our engagement on a Saturday so that more folks could make it, however we have still likely missed key groups of people such as immigrants, children, teenagers and Indigenous people. This is due to the short timeline of the project given its nature as a school assignment meaning we couldn’t get as much advertising out and we didn’t have available time to schedule engagement at schools. We also missed those who work weekends, typically lower income individuals and tradespeople. If the project was longer we could have also sent out surveys and more accessible ways of engagement. Despite this, we are grateful to have received the turnout that we did and everyone‘s feedback was highly valuable for the creation of our concepets.

3.1 WHAT WE HEARD Beginning with constraints, the community members present found access to and from the community as well as within the community very difficult. The looping nature of the streets and blocks makes navigation difficult, especially for those coming to visit the area, and bus traps make direct routes even harder. Laycock Park was also frequently brought up as difficult to access, stating that both active transportation and driving are not easy to get there. Transit access was also a challenge - E-W connections are highly limited. And despite frequent N-S routes, during rush hour the busses will continually be full with people from communities north of Thorncliffe heading downtown for work meaning those waiting in Thorncliffe often have to wait 3-4 busses before they can fit on, or have to give up and take a cab in order to make it to work on time. This issue in particular highlights the great need for the northern portion of the Greenline train to get built. Another worry for community members was safety around schools. Because a lot of students come from other communities there is a lot of driving, speeding and congestion during peak hours which can make it unsafe to walk in the area. A related issue is an unsafe pedestrian environment. Especially on major corridors 4th St SW and

Centre St there is not enough clear pedestrian crossings, and community members state that even when they go to a pedestrian activated light crossing drivers still often don’t stop. Additionally, sidewalks tend to be narrow and decaying or even fully stop and disappear. In parks, pedestrians don’t feel safe at night because there is insufficient lighting. The last clear challenge was a lack of amenities in the community. Community members often leave the community to use amenities and services. Given the difficulty getting in and out of the community this can be frustrating when leaving for daily needs. The community has limited commercial, medical services, senior services and grocery services, and residents are upset that the Safeway is becoming a Freshco.

Access

Schools

Pedestrian

Amenities

Moving into opportunities, the community would like to see better connectivity and access such as E-W transit connections. They would like the major “trouble” intersections to have better designs, particularly John Laurie and McKnight Blvd. They also feel there is opportunity to connect the parks and trails, namely providing bike connections from Nose Hill and the Nose Creek Trail. They also believe there is opportunity to improve the design and public realm along 4th St SW and Centre St. For housing, the community would like to see aging in place and senior oriented housing more than anything else. They also feel there is opportunity for more density or housing typologies provided it matches the current neighbourhood scale. Many felt that the secondary suites and rentals in the neighbourhood were already below market, however there could be opportunity to add specifically affordable housing. Another common thread was that the neighbourhood needed more amenities and local destinations. They would love to see a bit more small scale commercial as well as programming and art to help existing places become destinations. This included adding more seating and programming to the parks which are beloved but sometimes lacking. Lastly, community members felt there was a lot of opportunity to support nature and work with it, rather than against it. For example, new ways to manage stormwater was seen as necessary to address the local flooding, icy, and damp conditions felt for many months in a year. Community members also strongly felt that the mature trees are vital to community identity, habitat and mental, social and physical wellbeing, so they want to ensure these will not be removed with any development. And where there is no street trees, they would like to see them added if possible. A few community members were also aware of the buried Trafford Creek because of the frequent flooding of houses adjacent to its path. Those who knew of its presence felt that restoring the creek would be a good idea to help manage stormwater. The community was also very proud of the natural features of their neighbourhood and enjoy the presence of wildlife.

Connections

Housing

Destinations

Nature

3.2 GUIDING PRINCIPLES From our project understanding, public engagement and analysis, we came to four guiding principles that lead the direction of our concepts for the community.

GUIDING PRINCIPLES

img: Royal LePage

DIVERSE

INCLUSIVE

Design communities to encourage diverse people to enjoy the different housing options, prices and mixed-use hubs. Provide people-centred streets that enable diverse transportation options.

Create spaces, uses, services and amenities that welcome people of any age and any ability. Ensure any resident can reach their destinations safely and easily.

CONNECTED

ADAPTABLE

Design neighbourhoods that connect people, places and nature, through quality infrastructure, compact design, great open spaces, and enhanced public realm.

Create spaces that support the natural environment across future changes, and function through the seasons. Provide built typologies that can adapt to resident needs across ages and lifetimes.

4.0 COMMUNITY ANALYSIS 4 .1 C E N SUS & DE MO G RAPH IC S

Census data from 2001 to 2021 shows that all four communities have remained relatively stable. Projections to 2042 anticipate a combined growth of only 21%, indicating these are mature neighbourhoods with limited large-scale redevelopment and infill expected while Calgary as a whole is continuing to grow at an exponential rate. This supports the opportunity to direct growth towards the inner city rather than sprawl. Most notably, these communities are faced with an aging population with the highest percentage of residents being aged 35 to 64. Additionally, there is a relatively significant population of children aged 0 to 19. These demographics indicate the need for interventions that address both aging-in-place as well as young families. Labour force participation sits at roughly 50% and commuting patterns mirror Calgary, with driving as the primary mode of transportation. More distinct differences emerge when comparing income and housing tenure. Greenview is the most economically vulnerable, with 28% of households facing housing unaffordability. In contrast, Upper North Haven is the most affluent, with only 10% of households facing housing unaffordability. While Thorncliffe and North Haven fall between the two. POPULATION TREND 2001-2021

POPULATION PROJECTION 2014-2042

Calgary 1,400,000

1,291,790

1,200,000

Calgary

1,000,000

Thorncliﬀe

Greenview

North Haven

+60%

Upper North Haven

60%

800,000 600,000

50%

400,000 200,000 0

40% 2001

2006

2011

2016

2021

30%

POPULATION TREND 2001-2021 Thorncliﬀe

Greenview

North Haven

20%

Upper North Haven

10,000

8,695

8,000

Collectively +21%

10%

6,000 4,000 2,000 0

2001

2006

2011

2016

2,365 2,100 640 2021

-10%

2014

2016

2018

2020

2022

2024

2026

2028

2030

2032

2034

2036

2038

2040

2042

AGE DISTRIBUTION 2021

PER CENT OF VEHICLE COMMUTERS 2021

AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD SIZE 2021

CALGARY 77% Thorncliﬀe

THORNCLIFFE 72%

Greenview

North Haven

Upper North Haven

GREENVIEW 75%

42%

NORTH HAVEN 85%

THORNCLIFFE 2.4 persons

43%

GREENVIEW 1.9 persons

40%

37%

UPPER NORTH HAVEN 73%

NORTH HAVEN 2.4 persons

29%

30%

19%

20%

18%

15%

14%

12%

Thorncliﬀe

16%

HOUSING TENURE 2021

10%

PER CENT HOUSEHOLDS SPENDING 30% OR MORE OF TOTAL INCOME ON SHELTER 2021 North Haven

UPPER NORTH HAVEN 2.6 persons

28%

23%

22% 22%

Calgary

CALGARY 2.6 persons

50%

Thorncliﬀe North Haven

Upper North Haven

0-19

20-34

35-64

350%

65+

Greenview

Upper North Haven

300%

30%

94%

INCOME DISTRIBUTION 2021

28%

Calgary

25%

Calgary Greenview

24%

Thorncliﬀe

Greenview

North Haven

250%

Upper North Haven

50%

23%

46% 41%

40%

20%

200%

73%

36%

30%

28%

150%

45%

100%

58%

15% 13%

10%

21%

20%

18% 15%

10%

13%

14%

17%

16% 16%

15% 13%

12%

14% 12%

14%

12%

10%

12% 10% 10%

11%

$0-$39,999

$40,000-$59,999

$60,000-$79,999

55%

10%

42%

50% 5%

6% 27%

$80,000-$99,999

$100,000-$124,999

69%

$125,000+

31% 0% 0%

Ownership

Rentership

4.2 HISTORICAL ANALYSIS TIMELINE (TIME IMMEMORIAL) First Nations used Nose Hill as a lookout & Nose Creek was used for bison kills

(1947) Leduc oil boom & pop growth

(1884) Calgary became a town

(1938) YYC moved to current loc.

Calgary became a city (1894)

AERIAL PHOTOS

*Approximate Borders

(1924)

(1957)

(1954) Parade of homes in Thorncliffe to accommodate oil housing need

Thorncliffe, Greenview, North Haven est. (1950s & 60s)

(1962)

(2007) Calgary reaches 1 million people

(1972)

Nose Hill Park est. (1980)

(1982)

Communities separated (1991)

City-wide rezoning (2024)

(2024)

4.3 URBAN MORPHOLOGY FOOD SYSTEMS th Haven Comm Nor un ity

Save-on Foods

No s e Hi ll

64 t h A ve

Walmart

n rde Ga N

fo or

N o rt h mo un t D r

T ho rn c li ffe CA

N or th Haven CA

Ave

erf

4 t h St NE

Safeway (Future FreshCo)

M c K ni g ht B lvd

ie ur La hn

Ed m on to n Tr

C ent r e S t

4 t h St N W

Multi Fresh Super Market

rden Ga ity un

S pyhi ll Rd

liffe/Greenview C rnc om o m Th

No se Cr ee k

E ge rt ’s Pa rk

La yco ck Par k

B lac kt h o rn Rd

Grocery Stores Specialty Grocery Stores Supercentre Community Garden Restaurants Convenience Stores/Fast Food 500 m Radius

500 m Radius

In terms of amenities, the area remains relatively limited in both variety and distribution. The neighbourhood is anchored by two community associations, each offering a community garden that serves as an important social and agricultural resource for residents. Recreational needs are primarily served by the Thorncliffe Greenview Recreation Centre, while day-to-day shopping is supported by two grocery stores. The area also benefits from a modest selection of restaurants, several places of worship that reflect the community's cultural diversity, and notably strong access to Nose Hill Park, Calgary's largest urban natural spaces, which provides significant passive recreation opportunities for residents of all ages.

SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE

Judith Umbach Public Library

No se Hi ll

64 t h Av e

l Si

La yco c k Park

ic a

rfo

ill P

ark In dig e n o us

h Arc

B l ac k t ho rn Rd S py hil l Rd

E ger t ’s Pa rk

NW h St

14t

vd Bl ie ur La hn

Ed m on to n Tr

C ent r e St

4 t h St NW

M c K ni ght B l vd

North Haven Community Association

No se Cr ee k

Ave

4 t h St NE

Thorncliffe Greenview Community Association & Recreation Centre

erf

N o rt hm o unt Dr

Community Centres Recreation Facilities Religious Facilities

Public Library Shopping Centres Cultural Site

However, the current amenity offerings falls short of what is needed to support a growing and aging population. Expanding the range of everyday services, including healthcare facilities, personal services, childcare, and retail variety, will be essential to ensuring residents can meet their daily needs without leaving the neighbourhood. This is particularly critical for those wishing to age in place, for whom walkable access to essential services is not merely a convenience, but a matter of independence and quality of life.

SCHOOL ENROLMENT 2018-2025

North Haven School

Colonel Sanders School

Thorncliﬀe School

500

North Haven School (Public Elementary)

Colonel Sanders School (Public Elementary)

Corpus Christi School (Public Catholic Elementary)

400

+5.5%

300

+12.6% -14.8%

200

100

Thorncliffe School (Public Elementary)

2018-2019

2019-2020

2020-2021

FFCA North Middle School (Public Charter Middle)

Running at below capacity, there is the opportunity for these schools, especially Thorncliffe elementary to increase their student population by encourgaing attendance by students outside the community.

2022-2023

2023-2024

2024-2025

2025-2026

Sir John A Macdonald School (Public Junior High) Catherine Nichols Gunn School (Public Elementary)

SCHOOLS All 4 communities have a relatively high population of children, supported by the presence of five schools within the communities, 4 of which are elementary schools. Enrollment trends vary, with North Haven School declining by nearly 15 percent since 2018, while Thorncliffe and Colonel Sanders have seen smaller increases.

2021-2022

St. Helena School (Private Junior/Senior High)

Huntington Hills School (Public Elementary)

John G. Diefenbaker (Public High school)

2 1 5

Northwest Elementary Campus (Public Elementary)

Colonel Irvine School (Public Middle/Junior High)

Highwood School (Public Elementary)

Schools within the site Schools outside the site 500 m radius

4.4 URBAN MORPHOLOGY ANALYSIS SUMMARY

tre

FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS

6 4 t h A ve

No se H i l l

rfo

La yco ck Pa r k

r kD

S py hi l l Rd

Major Green Space No se Cre ek

h 4t

Ege r t’s Pa r k N or t hm o un t D r

vd Bl ie

Institutional t 12 S NE

Residential- Low Density

to n T rl

Residential- Medium Density

Edmon

reet

Ce n tr e St

LAND USES

M cKn i ght B l vd

4 t h St N W

Major Nodes

N or th Haven CA

erf

Community Nodes

W eN

Barriers

4 t h St NE

Th or n cl i ffe CA

11 Str e e t NE

B l a c kth o r n Rd

Industrial

Av e

Commercial

N E

Green Spaces Open Spaces

Beyond the question of supply, there are also concerns about the spatial distribution of existing amenities. Even where services do exist, uneven dispersion across the study area means that access is far from equitable for all residents. Compounding this challenge are a number of physical barriers that fragment the pedestrian network and limit connectivity. Major arterial roads along the community's periphery, as well as roads cutting through the interior of the site, create difficult and often unsafe crossing conditions for those on foot. Similarly, Nose Creek, while a valuable natural corridor, functions as a pedestrian barrier that interrupts movement to Skyline West. Together, these features sever connections between residents and the key destinations and nodes both within and beyond the community structure, undermining the walkability and cohesion that a healthy, livable neighbourhood depends on.

4.5 BUILT FORM ZONING 6 4 Ave

Nos e Hi ll

C-C1 - Community Commercial

La ycoc k Pa rk

C-CORE2 - Commercial Corridor

B l ac k t hor n Rd

rfo

C-N2 - Neighbourhood Commercial DC - Direct Control

S py h il l Rd

E ger t’s Pa rk

H-GO - Grade Oriented Housing De

N orth m ou nt Dr

C en tre S tree t

4 S tree t NW

Mc Kn i g h t B l vd

oot

N ort h H a ve n CA

4 t h St NE

erf

T h orn c l i ffe CA

I-G - General Industrial M-C1 - Contextual Low Profile (3-4 Story) M-C2 - Contextual Medium Profile (4-5 Story) M-CG - Contextual Grade-Oriented M-X2 - Mixed-Use Multi-Residential R-CG - Grade-Oriented Infill* S-CI - Community Institution S-CRI - City and Regional Infrastructure S-CS - Community Service S-FUD - Future Urban Development S-SPR - School, Park and Community Reserve S-UN - Urban Nature District *as o f A p ril 8, 2026 , b la nket rezo n in g h as be en rep ea led , w h ich re moves R-CG as th e de fa ult des i gn at ion for res i de nti al areas . Exp ec t R-CG to ch an ge in th e ne ar f u ture to R -C1 o r R -C2 .

The zoning map paints a vivid picture of small islands of commercial in a sea of residential uses. This is a typical zoning pattern that can be found in any neighbourhood of this age. Restrictive zoning districts limit the diversity of uses resulting in large areas that are only composed of one type of building. This can limit access to amenities and services and encourage vehicular travel for residents who live further away from the commercial zones.

The zoning just outside of the study area presents some interesting opportunities and challenges. There is industrial zoning to the east which is filled with a mix of commercial and light industrial building uses. Industrial uses can have a negative impact on residential uses such as noise and odour. The west is bordered by Nose Hill park, a special purpose district that has a positive impact on our communities.

1 4 S treet NW

LAND USE

64 A ve

No s e H i l l

rfo

La ycoc k Pa rk

Bl a c k th orn Rd Spyh i l l Rd

E ger t’s Pa rk

De erf

Nor thm ou n t Dr

oot

T h orn c l i ffe CA

Commercial - Large Scale

M c Kni g h t B l vd

Commercial - Neighbourhood Scale Residential - Medium Density

C en tre Stre et

4 S treet NW

4 t h St NE

Nor th H aven CA

Residential - Low Density Community Service Place of Worship School Light Industrial

LAND USE BREAKDOWN 0.5%

0.4%

2.6%

Commercial

19.1%

Residential Medium Density Residential Low Density

1.0% 10.3% 65.1%

Institution

Parks +Recreation Direct Control Other

The current land use reinforces the same patterns as our zoning analysis. You can see the lack of diversity in the large residential zones that take up over 65% of the land use. Additionally, we can see that the industrial district to the east is made up of a lot of commercial building uses that could be a benefit to the community.

N os e Hill

1 4 S treet NW

LAND OWNERSHIP

6 4 Ave

rfo

Laycoc k Par k

r kD

Bl a c k th orn Rd

CITY OWNED LAND

Spyh i l l Rd D e e rf o o

Eger t’s Pa r k

t Tr

Nor thm ou n t Dr Th or nc l i ffe CA N orth H a ve n CA

Proportion:

C en tre S treet

4 Stre et NW

Mc Kn i gh t Bl vd

49.13 ha 14.9%

SCHOOLS Area:

4 t h St NE

Area:

12.29 ha 3.7%

PRIVATE LAND Area: Proportion:

268.43 ha 81.4%

City Owned Land Schools Private Land

We split land ownership into three categories: city owned land, schools, and private land. In Calgary, the city owns the land in most parks and community service parcels such as community associations. Schools are a form of semi-private land as the Calgary Board of Education leases the land from the city. Any Private parcel is directly owned by a resident or a business.

There is potential for development on any one of these land ownership categories. However, it will be a more difficult endeavour to build on a public park (for many reasons) than a private parcel along a main street. This report will explore multiple scenarios involving each category.

BUILDING DENSITY

14 St ree t NW

FFIGURE IG URE GGROUND ROU ND

GREENVIEW

64 A ve

N o se H il l

La ycoc k Park

Units/ha:

23.69

Buildings/ha:

10.89

Building Coverage:

17.6%

THORNCLIFFE Units/ha:

11.06

rfoo

Buildings/ha:

12.41

t Tr

Building Coverage:

16.2%

Dee

E ge rt ’s Par k

M c K nig ht B lvd

C ent re S t re et

4 S t re et NW

NORTH HAVEN

The figure ground is a classic planning tool to analyze built form. It highlights the relationship between structures, the black shapes, and open space. In our study area, we can see an abundance of open space with relatively homogenous structures blanketed throughout. There are a few larger shapes distributed throughout that are all accompanied by an open space around them.

Units/ha:

11.76

Buildings/ha:

14.77

Building Coverage:

19.6%

UPPER NORTH HAVEN Units/ha:

9.29

Buildings/ha:

15.8

Building Coverage:

19.2%

In terms of unit density, it is uniform across the communities, with the exception of Greenview. Their units per hectar is double that of the rest of the communities while their building coverage is on the lower end. This is a good example of how denser building types can achieve more units without taking up more space.

NATURAL BARRIERS

1 4 S tree t NW

BLOCK STRUCTURE

6 4 Ave

Nos e H i ll No

rfo

Spy hi l l Rd

N orth H a ve n N W CA

t Tr

Th or nc l i ffe CA

4 t h St NE

rfoo

Nor th m ou nt Dr 4

Dee

Egert’s Par k

La ycoc k Pa rk

Bl a c k th orn Rd

Loose Grid

C e ntre St reet

4 S treet NW

Mc Kn i g ht B lvd

Irregular Grid

The block structure generally gives us a good idea of an areas potential for redevelopment. A formal grid pattern with rear lanes is typically the most flexible for redevelopment with the potential to join adjacent parcels to build larger developments. The “loops and lollipops” of many suburbs on the other hand, are very restrictive due to the irregular parcel shapes and poor connectivity between blocks.

Our study area has a mix of loose and irregular grid, so we fall somewhere in the middle for development potential. However, most blocks have rear lane access and a typical shape meaning that redevelopment can happen. From this map, a pattern of contained block units can be seen. The largest challenge are the connections between these units. They are separated by natural barriers that make navigating between them difficult.

TYPICAL SMALL PARCEL

1 4 S treet NW

PARCELS

6 4 Av e

N os e Hill

Dee rfoo

Mc Kn i g ht B lvd

C en tre S treet

4 S treet NW

t Tr

LARGE PARCEL

Parcel size and shape dictate what can be built on a particular lot. A small parcel is more limiting, but can still host a variety of uses such as residential homes, neighbourhood-scale commercial, or small parks. Large parcels allow for large projects such as multi-family residential or large-scale commercial. Parcels can be combined to make more area, but it can be difficult to organize the purchase of several adjacent lots.

Parcels Large Parcels

Our study area is mostly composed of small single family-oriented parcels. This is reflective of the low-density residential zoning that makes up most of the land area. Outside of this, there are some larger lots that could be repurposed for large-scale developments, but most growth will have to happen with creative solutions in the smaller lots.

3D A NALY SIS Nos e Hi l l Park Pr

o op

e Gr

lin

Upper Nor t h Haven Nort h Haven 14

Thorncl i f fe

60 0 m Walks hed

W tN

4 Pro po se d L RT St a t io n

Greenvi ew

N St

t en

Ave

Sky l ine West Mc

t ee

igh

lvd

rfo

Our 3D analysis helps to visualize the built form of our study area. Single family homes are peppered throughout the landscape with only a few areas that provide different building typologies. The area highlighted in Greenview is an example of a more dense built form. It has town homes and low-rise appartments in place of single family homes.

t ee

lvd

BUILDING TYPOLOGIES

SINGLE DETACHED HOME

Total Units: Proportion: Estimated Pop: Total Area: Pop Density:

4-PLEX

2,855 48.1% 6,566 235.29 ha 28 ppl/ha

Total Units: Unit Proportion: Estimated Pop: Total Area: Pop Density:

14 <1% 32 0.6 ha 53 ppl/ha

ROW HOMES

3-STORY APARTMENT

4-STORY APARTMENT

Total Units: 1,215 Unit Proportion: 20.5% Estimated Pop: 2,794 Total Area: 23.67 ha Pop Density: 118 ppl/ha

Total Units: 396 Unit Proportion: 6.7% Estimated Pop: 910 Total Area: 4.98 ha Pop Density: 183 ppl/ha

Total Units: 439 Unit Proportion: 7.4% Estimated Pop: 1,009 Total Area: 3.89 ha Pop Density: 259 ppl/ha

MISSING TYPOLOGIES

Laneway Homes (Google Maps)

Live Work (Google Maps)

Neighbourhood

Mixed-Use

Commercial (Google Maps)

(Roundsquare)

Commercial

6-Story Appartments (Google Maps)

No s e H i l l

ORIGINAL SHOWHOME (1954)

1 4 Stre et

BUILDING AGE

6 4 Ave

k ol

Laycoc k Par k

Dr B l ac k th or n Rd S py h il l Rd

Eger t’s Pa rk

Dee rfoo

Ce ntre Stre et

4 Stree t NW

Mc K ni g h t B l vd

The way we build homes in Canada results in a 50-60 year lifespan before major repairs or replacement in needed. The homes in our study area were mostly built in the 60's and 70's, leaving the majority of them past or at the end of their expected life cycle.

t Tr

Th orn c l i ffe CA

No rth H a ven CA

4 t h St NE

W eN

Nor th m ou nt Dr

NEW TYPOLOGY (2024) YEAR OF CONSTRUCTION Before 1944 1945 - 1964 1965 - 1984 1985 - 2004 2005 - 2024

This is a natural turning point for communites everywhere. We can expect, even without intervention, that change will occur. Some homes will be renovated, but many will be replaced. What sorts of structures should we be targeting to best meet the needs of a growing city and community?

AVG HOUSING PRICE FROM EXISTING LISTINGS (REALTOR.ca, 2026) DETACHED HOUSE:

ROW HOME:

$673,475

CONDO:

$361,300

$226,697

14 Stree t

REAL ESTATE SUMMARY 64 Ave

3 2

Nose Hi l l

k ol

5 Bla c k tho rn Rd Spy h ill Rd

Tho r nc li ffe CA

t Tr

No r th H ave n CA W N ve

rfoo

Centre Street

10 4 Stre et NW

116 - 6440 4 Street NW $389,900 Row home | 3 Bed | 2 Bath | 1129 sqft

103 - 231 64 Avenue NW $205,000 Condo | 2 Bed | 1 Bath | 793 sqft

$680,000 5923 Thorncliffe Drive NW Detached House | 3 Bed | 3 Bath | 1350 sqft

6 - 6147 Buckthorn Road NW $309,888 Condo | 2 Bed | 1 Bath | 834 sqft

$699,900 6116 Buckthorn Road NW Detached House | 2 Bed | 4 Bath | 1259 sqft

3 - 93 Grier Place NE $375,000 Row home | 3 Bed | 2 Bath | 1415 sqft

114 - 420 Grier Avenue NE $319,000 Row home | 2 Bed | 1 Bath | 925 sqft

4328 Greenview Drive NE $589,000 Detached House | 3 Bed | 2 Bath | 1055 sqft

315 - 335 Garry Crescent NE $181,900 Condo | 2 Bed | 2 Bath | 1001 sqft

302 - 4455A Greenview Drive NE $210,000 Condo | 2 Bed | 2 Bath | 1001 sqft

Dee

No rth mo un t Dr

4 t h St NE

328 Norseman Road NW $725,000 Detached House | 3 Bed | 3 Bath | 1566 sqft

Laycoc k Par k

E ge rt’s Par k

McKni ght Bl vd

To get a better idea of the current housing market in the area, we compiled a list of all home listings in the area at the time of our analysis. We split them into three categories: Detached homes, Rowhomes, and Condos.

The average price of each category was noted and will be compared to Calgary averages in the next page. At the time we conducted this analysis, there was a notable lack of listings in the North Haven community. This could be a sign of slower redevelopment rates, but a more comprehensive study would need to take place to be sure.

CALGARY AVG HOUSING PRICE (CERB, JAN 2026)

Nos e H il l

1 4 S t re e t

$301,200

r kD

Eger t ’s Park

Dee

T ho r nc lif fe CA

$817,500

^^ 328 Norseman Road NW

$632,000

5923 Thorncliffe Drive NW

$683,500

6116 Buckthorn Road NW

$526,500

4328 Greenview Drive NE

t Tr

N o r th H ave n N W CA

rfoo

M cK n i gh t Blvd C en t re S tre e t

4 S t re e t NW

4 t h St NE

N o rt h mo u nt Dr

La yco c k Par k

B lac kt h o rn Rd S py hi ll Rd

CALGARY ASSESSED PROPERTY VALUE

64 Ave

The City of Calgary assesses the value of each parcel for tax purposes. We compared the assessed values to some of the homes that were listed for sale to see if there were any trends. Most were under the market price, to be expected in winter, but the North Haven listing was a bit higher. This inflated price could be a factor in slowing redevelopment rates.

COST ($/SQM) 9

<500 501 - 1000 1001 - 1500 >1500

^^ or

CITY OF CALGARY PARCEL VALUE ASSESSMENT

$420,800

$724,000

CONDO:

ROW HOME:

DETACHED HOUSE:

than market value

Overall, market and assessed values for homes in our study area are a touch lower than the city of Calgary average. If left without intervention, there is not enough development pressure for developers to come in and try to recover high land costs with multiple units. This will result in older single family homes being replaced with new single family homes or duplexes.

64 Ave

rfo

Laycoc k Par k

B l ac k th or n Rd

S py h il l Rd

D ee rf oo t Tr

No se Hill

EXISTING STREET SCAPES

14 S tr e e

POTENTIAL GROWTH

4.6 BUILT FORM ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Ege rt’s Par k No rth m ou nt Dr

North Haven Drive NW th

N ort h H a ven CA

4 t h St NE

T h orn c l i ffe CA

Greenview Drive NE

Potential Development Corridors Block Structures Restaurants Grocery Stores

3 C en tre Stree t

Centre Street N

Cafe Commercial Residential - Medium Density

No se Cr ee k

4 St reet N W

Mc Kn i g ht B l vd

Residential - Low Density Institution Parks + Recreation

Through our built form analysis, we found that our study area is overwhelmingly covered by low density housing. It does not have the building diversity that an area with a designated main street should have. There is an opportunity to direct development to the higher traffic volume streets that run through the community. These have the capacity to support higher density housing and commercial uses. Currently, a lot of these streets have aging single family homes that are in need of major rapairs of replacement. We could transform some of these spaces into mixed-use hubs that encourage people to stop and connect with the rest of the community.

4.7 NATURAL FEATURES ELEVATION NW

64 t h Ave

Nose Hi ll

rfo

Bla ckthor n Rd

Layco ck Par k

ELEVATION VALUE (MASL)

Spyhi ll Rd Eger t’s Par k

879 - 982 Nor thmount Dr Thor ncl i ffe CA

983 - 1,070 1,071 - 1,170

4 t h St NE

Ave

No rth Ha ven CA

vd Bl ie ur Jo

Nos e Cree k

Centr e St

4 t h St NW

McKni ght Bl vd

1,171 - 1,275 1,276 - 1,585 1 m contour 5 m contour

SLOPE

As established, the communities are situated between Nose Creek and Nose Hill Park, one of the largest municipal parks in North America. This position gives the communities many unique natural features such as rolling hills within the fabric of the community. In general, the communities slope downwards from the Nose Hill side towards the creek.

64 t h Ave

Nos e Hi l l

rfo

La yco ck Par k

Bl acktho rn Rd

Spyhil l Rd Eger t’s Par k Nor thmo unt Dr

Nor th Haven CA

Ce ntre Stree t

vd Bl ie ur La hn

SLOPE VALUE (%)

McKni ght Bl vd

Nos e Cree k

Centr e St

4 t h St NW

4 Street NW

Ave

4 t h St NE

Tho rncli ffe CA

0.01 - 2 2.01 - 15 15.01 - 30 30.01 - 100

One thing to note is that the steepest slopes are found in the open spaces and along road sides which can lead to some challenges for pedestrian movement and for drainage.

DRAINAGE 64 t h Ave

NW St

Blackthorn Rd

t Tr

fo or

D ee rf oo

Nose Hill

Laycock Park

Spyhill Rd

Northmount Dr

Egert’s Park

Thorncl iffe CA North Haven CA

4 t h St NE

McKni ght Blvd

vd Bl ie ur La hn

High

No se Cr ee k

Centre St

4 t h St NW

FLOW ACCUMULATION VALUE

Low

The hilly nature of the communities mean drainage can be a challenge as there are lots of natural low points to accumulate water. Although Calgary is not a particularly rainy city, the snow and ice accumulation is particularly dangerous, as is the heavy rains experienced in the spring and summer. Additionally, the frequent freeze-thaw environment leads to icy streets becoming waterfalls and vice versa.

It’s clear that the open spaces face both the steepest slopes and worst drainage anywhere in the community. Therefore, it is essential to address the drainage concerns through low-impact design measures (discussed in section 7).

64 t h Ave

CAN

HABITAT FEATURES

Y OP

Laycock Park lk

Blackthorn Rd

fo or

Nose Hil l

Spyhill Rd

Egert’s Park

Northmount Dr

FIEL

Thorncliffe CA North Haven CA

4 t h St NE

K EE

McKnight Blvd

Bl ie ur La hn

No se Cr ee k

Flood Zone Centre St

4 t h St NW

Urban Forest (public trees)

Open Space Network Contaminated Site Nose Creek Riparian Area

Given the importance of both Nose Hill and Nose Creek as habitats it comes as no surprise that these communities also greatly contribute to habitat. The urban forest provides habitat for many species that rely on tree canopies for protection, food, and nesting. The urban tree canopy also acts as a vital “highway system” for critters to get from place to place without crossing dangerous roadways.

Nose Creek is of course incredibly important to provide species with year-round access to water. A feature of note here is the riparian area - a highly productive vegetated zone that buffers the creek, protects water quality and stabilizes banks. Unfortunately, this riparian area is largely developed with industrial and commercial uses. As these uses become more commercialized, there could be opportunity to restore some of the riparian area.

LOCAL SPECIES

INAT WILDLIFE SIGHTINGS

BIRDS

MAMMALS

BIRDS

Black-Billed Magpie

House Sparrow (introduced)

Eastern Grey Squirrel (introduced)

White-tailed Jackrabbit

MAMMALS

American Robin

Northern Flicker

White-tailed Deer

North American Porcupine

Canada Goose

Coyote

THREATENED

Common Grackle

Turkey Vulture

Bobcat

Based on the observations from iNaturalist, a citizen science app, these are the top species spotted in the area as well as some of those of threatened status in Alberta. The threatened species were all spotted within the open space network, highlighting the importance of green space for their survival.

Western Tiger Salamander (amphibian)

64 t h Av e

Blackt hor n Rd

Laycock Park

Nose Hil l

Spyhil l Rd

Ege rt ’s Park

Nort hmount Dr Thorncl iffe CA

Nort h Haven CA

W eN

4 t h St NE

TOTAL ESA SCORE >15 (very high)

LOCAL WILDLIFE CORRIDORS

When we examine wildlife observations, several wildlife clusters emerge. First, Nose Hill is one of the most notable habitats in the city. The second cluster, the ex-Highland Golf course in between 4th St NW and Centre Street is important for many raptors and scavenging birds including the threatened turkey vultures. The other two notable clusters are along Nose Creek which is prominent habitat and a key wildlife corridor within Calgary.

McKnight Bl vd

Bl ie ur La hn Jo

Local Wildlife Corridor

Open Space Network

Wildlife Cluster

Nose Creek

No se Cr ee k

Ce nt re St

4 t h St NW

ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS

<5 (low)

Riparian Zone

Because of the historical watershed in this area, wildlife have been using the corridors here for thousands of years. Although the creeks feeding into Nose Creek were buried in the 1950s and 60s, the wildlife still use these corridors to get to and from Nose Creek. Thankfully in this community, much of the essential corridors are on publicly owned land that remains as green space. However one key corridor is around Centre Street, which is highly dangerous. Additionally, wildlife do not only use those corridors, and yards and pocket parks are often islands of safety in a sea of concrete and cars. It is because of this, that in our site, an average of 70 animals/year (~6 animals/month) are called in to the City for dead animal pickup (City of Calgary, multiple dates).

4.8 OPEN SPACE TYPOLOGIES & ACCESS PROGRAMMED

OPEN SPACE TYPOLOGIES

64 t h Ave

Nose Hill Laycock Par k

SCHOOLS

Bl ackthor n Rd

Spyhill Rd Egert ’s Par k Nort hmount Dr

Thor ncliffe CA

UNPROGRAMMED

4 t h St NE

Nor th Have n CA

W eN

McKnight Blv d

Bl ie ur La hn Jo

Programmed Sports

Other

Walking & Dog Off-Leash

Schools (Semi-Public)

Unprogrammed

Community Garden

No se Cr ee k

Centr e St

4 t h St NW

DOG OFF-LEASH

Playground

Collectively, these communities have good proximity and access to public open spaces. Even where there seems to be a gap in the central north, right across 64th Ave is more programmed school spaces. One clear opportunity is that there is a lot of unprogrammed and unusable dog off-leash space that could contribute more to activity and habitat.

GREEN SPACE ACCESS

PRIVATE 64 t h Ave

Laycock Park NW

Bl ackthorn Rd

Nose Hil l

Spyhi l l Rd

Eger t’s Park

Northmount Dr

PUBLIC

Thor ncli f fe CA

Nor th Haven CA

W 4 t h St NE

Bl ie ur La hn Jo

No se Cr ee k

Centr e St

4 t h St NW

McKnight Bl vd

Private Public / Semi-public

In addition to the public green spaces, the high number of single-detached homes means that almost every household also has private access to green space. Even the apartment buildings have private or semi-private green space directly beside the buildings. Typically, private green space is not considered, but yards are an essential piece of animal habitat and a significant factor in our mental and social health.

4.9 WINTER CONSIDERATIONS WINTER CITIES 64 t h Ave

Laycock Park

Blackthorn Rd

Nose Hill

S py hill Rd

Egert’s Park

Nor thmoun t Dr

Thornclif fe CA

Open Space City Snow Clearance 18 hrs

North Haven CA 48

Provincial Snow Clearance 18 hrs

4 t h St NE

City Snow Clearance 24 hrs

Bl ie ur La hn

No se Cr ee k

Centre S t

City Cleared Pathways Outdoor Programming

4 t h St NW

McKnight Blvd

Indoor Programming Slope Concern Topography

Considering how a city functions during the winter months is a must in Canada. Here, the City of Calgary is responsible for clearing our roads and sidewalks that abut city-owned land. Unfortunatly due to a sprawling city and limited resources, the city can only clear major roads and those that may be dangerous if uncleared. The sloped nature of the communities also leaves a concern for slipping on ice, and busses and vehicles to get stuck on the hills.

4.10 CLIMATIC FACTORS The community likely experiences the standard climatic conditions found across Calgary listed in the table to the right. With climate change, these averages will not be as reliable.

CALGARY DATA

CLIMATE CHANGE PREDICTIONS:

SUMMER

Higher average temperatures, more extreme range Increase in drought conditions and wildfires Frost season shortens and pollen/growing season lengthens Increase in severe rains, hail and flooding during rainy season Decrease in heavy snowfalls One good thing arising from climate change, is that we are shifting our energy profiles across the world. Just a few years ago in Alberta, coal and natural gas dominated the energy split. Today, coal has been removed from our local profile and renewable energy sources are quickly on the rise.

AVG DAYLIGHT

TEMP RANGE o

15 h

+2 to +31 C o

AVG PRECIP 52 mm / month

EQUINOX

10 h

-21 to +22 C

22.5 mm / month

WINTER

9.5 h

-29 to +10 C

13 mm / month

CLIMATE CHANGE

N/A

AVG DAYS OF SNOW

2.35 / 10

AVG AIR QUALITY

52 / YR

ENERGY SPLIT*

North Haven Community Association

*approximations taken from Canada Energy Regulator

Wind 10

Wind 22

Coal 33

Solar 5 2021

Natural Gas 47

Hydro 6

2026

Natural Gas 50

Solar 21

WIND & SUN 64 t h Ave Laycock Park

Spy hi ll Rd

WESTERLY WINDS

ls t

Egert’s Park Northmount Dr

CHINOOK WINDS

Thorncl if fe CA

Nor th Haven CA

4 t h St NE

SECONDARY WINDS

Blackthor n Rd

ic e

fo or

Nose Hill

u eq

ino

McKni ght Bl vd

Bl ie ur La hn Jo

Overall, the community experiences primary winds from the west in the form of strong westerly winds and chinook winds which are unique to southern Alberta. Secondary winds come from the south west. In general, Alberta is both one if the windiest provinces and one of the sunniest, which makes it a prime area for renewable energy.

Centre St

Low

4 t h St NW

High

v ar

win

o rs

lst

ice

No se Cr ee k

SOLAR POTENTIAL

al nnu

n ti o

As renewable energy becomes increasingly important, each household can do their part to contribute and there are federal, provincial and municipal initiatives that can help with purchase and installation, discussed in section 7.1. This map is from the City of Calgary Residential Solar Calculator, which can be accessed here: https://www.calgary.ca/environment/resources/residential-solarcalculator.html

SHADOW STUDY KEY MAP

In addition to solar potential, shadowing is another aspect of the sun that can be analyzed. Given the low rise built form of these communities, shadowing is of minimal concern, and even in winter there will often still be sunny paths to walk.

EQUINOX

Edmon ton Trl

8 AM

Nos e Cree k

4 stories, ~14 m

1 story, ~4 m

12 PM

5:30 PM

NOV 21

9 AM

12 PM

3:30 PM

4.11 OPEN SPACE ANALYSIS SUMMARY INTERVENTIONS

*adapted from Friedman & Pollock, 2024

Playgrounds

Outdoor Exercise

Proximity

Sports

Urban Agriculture

Farmer Markets

Cultural Events

Street Markets

Trails & Offleash

RECREATION

OPPORTUNITIES Permanent winter programming Host pop up and cultural events in open spaces and street network Stormwater low-impact design Increased urban agriculture Rewild unused off-leash spaces Diversify play and exercise options

Programmed Sports

Unprogrammed

Community Garden

Winter Programming Outdoor

Schools (Semi-Public)

Walking & Off-Leash

Playground

Winter Programming Indoor

Trails

Paved Pathways

From analyzing natural features, open space typologies, winter and climatic factors we were led to data driven observations. Although there is significant access to open space, not all of it is good quality and there is significant opportunities to improve the open space system, listed here and discussed further in section 7.

4.12 MOBILITY

ROAD HEIRARCHY

LOCAL - NORFOLK DR NW

64 t h Av e

Nos e Hi l l

rfo

10m

2 Spyhi l l Rd

Laycoc k Park

Bl ackthorn Rd

1 Egert’s Park

N orthmount Dr

2m 3m

T horncl i ffe CA

3m 2m 7m

12m

COLLECTOR - 4 ST NW

North Have n CA

4 t h St NE

Centre St

Ave

4 t h St NW

Mc Kni ght Bl v d

Nose Cree k

Arterial

Collector

10m

2m 3m

14m

ARTERIAL - MCKNIGHT BLVD NW

1m 1m

14m

3.5m

Local

Looking at road hierarchy, the neighborhood is generally well covered and connected through each of the typologies. Even though the boundary of the community doesn’t have a main arterial road, just to the right is Deerfoot Trail which allows for connections from the North, East, West, and South of the community with traffic flowing to lower orders of road.

No Clear Boundar y

19m

TRAVEL TIME COMPARISON T RAN S IT ROUT ES

Thorncliffe Greenview 64 t h Ave

20 Minutes Laycock Par k

rfo

No se Hi ll

9 Minutes

Bl ack th orn Rd

Spyh il l Rd

21 Minutes

Eger t’s Par k Nor thmount Dr

Ave

Thor ncl i ffe CA

13 Minutes

4 t h St NE

Calgary International Airport

Centre St

4 t h St NW

No rth Haven CA

28 Minutes

McKn ight Bl vd

7 Minutes

Nos e Cre ek

Confederation Park

Downtown Calgary

41 Minutes

11 Minutes

600m Walkshed 600m Radius BRT

Proposed Greenline Alignment

University of Calgary

Future Greenline Stop Commuter Route Bus Stop

The proximity of Thorncliffe – Greenview – North Haven lands favorably to most destinations in Calgary, even when taking a bus, with the furthest distance for this example being the University of Calgary. However, there are longer commutes from this locale. Considering the proposed stops and alignments for the Greenline LRT, it would help to improve travel time through alternative modes of transportation. Although the walkshed you can see here does not cover a lot of the western edge of these communities so busing would be required to get to the LRT station. Additionally, the bus stops shown are quite close to each other and fall within a 600-meter walkshed distance of any property within the community. However, the community is still lacking east-west connections, especially to the nearby Brentwood and Saddletowne Stations.

TRAFFFIC VOLUME AND INCIDENTS

64 t h Ave

Nose Hill

Layco ck Par k

Dr Blackt hor n Rd

k ol

Spyhill Rd

Nort hmount Dr

Cent re St

Egert ’s Park

Tho rncliffe CA

4 t h St NE

Nor th Haven CA

4 t h St NW

48 t h Ave NW

McKni ght B lvd

Nos e Cre ek

Cyclist Incident

Motor Vehicle Incident

Pedestrian Incident

In terms of safety for pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists, 4 intersections were particularly notorious for having high rates of collisions. That being Centre St. @ McKnight BV, 4 ST NW @ 64 AV NW, John Laurie Blvd @ McKnight Blvd, and Center St N @ 64 AV NW. In terms of total traffic Centre St N @ McKnight Blvd had the most amount of pedestrian, bicyclists, and cars and the highest number of incidents. John Laurie @ McKnight Blvd had the second highest volume of the 4 streets but had one of the lowest rates of incidents despite the poor design. It seems that flow was sacrificed in favor of a safer intersection. Finally, Centre St N @ 64 AV NW and 4 ST NW @ 64 AV NW had the two lowest traffic volumes at 36,351 per day and 26,820 per day respectively. However, there were other intersections with high rates of collisions and could be improved through traffic calming measures and a proper analysis to improve safety.

WALKSHED AND TRAILS

WALKSHED AND TRAILS 64 t h Ave

k ol

Layco ck Park

Bl ackthor n Rd

Nose Hil l

Spyhi ll Rd

Eger t’s Par k

Nor t hmount Dr

MISSING SIDEWALKS

LACK OF MARKED CROSSWALKS

DILAPIDATED INFRASTRUCTURE

NARROW SIDEWALKS

Thor ncli ffe CA Nor th Haven CA

Ave

4 t h St NE

Cent r e St

4 t h St NW

McKnight Blv d

Nos e Cre ek

Trails

Bike Trails

600m Walkshed

The built form here reflects the age of the buildings and infrastructure. For example, in some parts the sidewalk disappears into a grassy area, with no real indicator that you are allowed to walk there. Marked sidewalks do exist in the neighborhood, but there are not enough to encourage pedestrians, and a feeling of being seen and being safe when walking across the road. Speaking of sidewalks, many of them were either sinking into the ground or being uprooted, making it extremely unfriendly to those with mobility issues, especially in a wheelchair where anything greater than a half an inch would stop you in your tracks. In addition to this, the sidewalks were narrow in many places making it difficult for two people to pass each other comfortably walking, let alone a parent with a stroller or an elderly person with a walker passing by.

UTILITY POLES

64 t h Ave

fo or

Laycock Par k

Dr Bl ackthorn Rd

Nose Hil l

Spyhi l l Rd Egert’s Park Nor thmount Dr

North Haven CA

4 t h St NE

Mc K nig ht Bl vd

Nose Cree k

Centre St

Ave

4 t h St NW

Thornc l i ffe CA

Large quantity of overhead power poles, limiting urban greenery. Above ground power lines also pose a hazard to pedestrians and vehicles during wind events.

Power Pole

One thing that could improve the pedestrian feel for the community is getting rid of overhead power poles where it’s not necessary and replacing them with greenery. Right now, these poles are a hazard during storms and can pose a hazard to drivers if they run into one and knock it over. Rather, these could simply be replaced by trees to help regreen the area. Some additional advantages include 1. Better dependability in poor weather Since the lines remain buried, they’re shielded from wind, snow, lightning, and collapsing trees. This implies less outages during storms, something above ground systems are particularly vulnerable to. 2. Enhanced safety Underground utilities decrease the risk of incidental contact (like automobiles striking poles or people confronting downed wires). They furthermore lower the probability of fires produced by sparking lines, which is a key worry in dry areas.

3. Cleaner appearance No poles, cables, or transformers covering the skyline. This is a huge reason undergrounding is prevalent in newer communities and city developments. 4. Less ongoing upkeep You do not have to cut trees nearby lines or fix storm damage as frequently. While maintenance can be more involved, the day-today maintenance is typically lower. 5. More steady voltage performance Belowground power lines are less open to environmental variations, so they can give more steady electrical performance.

STORM WATER INFRASTRUCTURE 64 t h Ave

rfo

Bl ackthor n Rd Laycock Par k

Nose Hi l l

Spyhi l l Rd

Eger t’s Park Nor thmount Dr

Thor ncl iffe CA

Nor th Haven CA h

4 t h St NE

48 t

vd Bl ie ur La Jo

No se Cr ee k

Centr e St

4 t h St NW

McKni ght Bl vd

Water Accumulation High

Low

Storm Water Pipe

In terms of storm water infrastructure and flow accumulation there are only three areas for concern in the middle-left corner, middle-upper left corner, and upper right corner of the community where there are large accumulations of water. However, these are all fields and are only a concern during heavy rainfall events as softscape areas, especially with flora, help absorb water. Additionally, the community is well connected with storm water infrastructure, with the natural terrain helping guide water to these pipes.

4.13 MOBILITY & MORPHOLOGY ANALYSIS SUMMARY THORNCLIFFE SCHOOL ATTENDANCE ZONE

TRANSIT ACCESS TO SCHOOLS

64 t h Ave

Nose Hill

rfo

Laycock Par k

Blackthor n Rd

Spyhi ll Rd Eger t’s Par k North mount Dr Th orncli ffe CA

Ave

4 t h St NE

North Haven CA

vd Bl ie ur La hn Jo

The map highlights the proposed Green Line LRT alignment and its two stations, showing fragmented walksheds caused by major road barriers and incomplete sidewalk connections. Several nearby schools sit just inside and outside these walksheds, underscoring both the opportunity for improved student access and the current pedestrian mobility challenges. The Thorncliffe School attendance boundary also runs alongside the proposed LRT, emphasizing the corridor’s importance for daily school travel, neighbourhood connectivity and potential for growth.

Nos e Cre ek

Cen tre S t

4 t h St NW

McKn ight Blvd

Proposed Greenline Route Proposed Greenline Stations

BRT Bus Route 600m Walkshed

600m Radius

5. 0 CONCEPTS: HOUSING This section focuses on the neighbourhood parcels that are currently zoned as residential and how we envision future growth through gentle densification. Although the area is beginning to see incremental densification through missing middle development, it is still dominated by single-family housing with pockets of low-rise apartments. Thorncliffe, Greenview, and North Haven have the capacity potential for 10,000 new residents. At 2.3 people per household, this means 4,302 new dwellings are needed to accommodate the population increase once the plan is released. By implementing our housing specific principles, we can introduce strategic and meaningful densification that aligns with the existing urban fabric and resident needs, rather than compete with them.

PRINCIPLE ALIGNMENT Mixed-Use and Live/Work Opportunities DIVERSE

Multi-family Residential

Supports Aging-in-Place INCLUSIVE

Supports Families

Near Community Amenities

CONNECTED

Transit Oriented Development

Affordable Options

ADAPTABLE

Varied Unit Sizes

5.1 OVERVIEW EXISTING - Zoning

PROPOSED INTERVENTIONS - Zoning

Laycock Par k

Nose Hill

fo or

Blackt horn Rd

Nos e Hill

64 t h Ave

fo or

Spyh ill Rd

Laycock Park Blackt horn Rd

Spyh ill Rd

Eger t’s Par k

Eger t’s Par k North mount Dr

Nor thmount Dr Th orncli ffe CA

W eN

4 t h St NE

Nor th Haven CA

4 t h St NE

Nor th Haven CA

Th orncli ffe CA

W eN

vd Bl ie ur La Jo

Bl ie ur La hn

Nos e Cre ek

Centr e St

McKn igh t Bl vd 4 t h St NW

Nos e Cre ek

Centr e St

4 t h St NW

McKn igh t Bl vd

Grade Oriented Housing (H-GO)

Contextual Medium Profile (M-C2)

Mixed Use - General (MU-1)

Commercial Neighbourhood 1 (C-N1)

Contextual Low Profile (M-C1)

Contextual Grade-Oriented (M-CG)

Grade-Oriented Infill (R-CG)

Contextual Medium Profile (M-C2)

Grade-Oriented Infill (R-CG)

Mixed-Use Multi-Residential (M-X2)

Grade Oriented Housing (H-GO)

High Density Low Rise (M-H1)

Direct Control (DC)

No Zoning Modifier

FOCUS AREA GUIDING VISIONS

DIVERSITY Increase density through diverse housing options that accommodate a wide demographic range.

ADAPTABLILITY Housing typologies that can change and adapt to residents needs such as aging-in-place and multigenerational families.

AFFORDABILITY

LIVABILITY

Prioritizing affordable housing options to foster equity, opportunity, and stability for those facing vulnerabilities.

Support resident’s daily lives through quality infrastructure, connectivity, and wellbeing.

PROPOSED INTERVENTIONS - SCALE

Nose Hi ll

64 t h Av e

Blackthorn Rd

rfo

Layco ck Pa rk

Spyhil l Rd Egert’s Park

Thornclif fe CA Nor thmount Dr

Nos e Cre ek

Ave

4 t h St NE

NW Nor th Haven CA

on Ed m

ont

Centre St

4 t h St NW

Tr l

McKnight Bl vd

Limited (up to 3 storeys) Low - Modified (up to 4 storeys)

Low (up to 6 storeys) No Scale Modifier

LOW-DENSITY/MISSING MIDDLE (R-CG & H-GO)

MID-DENSITY/MISSING MIDDLE (H-GO & M-C2)

HIGH-DENSITY/MIXED USE (M-H1 & MU-1)

Backyard Suite/Laneway Housing

Low-rise Apartments

Mid-rise Apartments

4-plex

Townhouse/Rowhouse

Stacked Townhouse/Rowhouse

6-plex

Courtyard Apartment

Mixed Use Residential

5.2 CENTRE STREET TOD - THORNCLIFFE CONNECT Concept

INTERVENTION LOCATIONS NW

64 t h Ave

Nos e Hil l

rfo

Laycock Park

Bla cktho rn Rd

Spyhil l Rd Egert’s Park Northmount Dr Tho rncl if fe CA

4 t h St NE

Nor th Haven CA

e th Av 48

Bl ie ur La hn

Proposed LRT Stations

200 m TOD Radius

Current BRT Stops

400 m TOD Radius

Greenline BRT/Proposed LRT Route

600 m TOD Radius

Nos e Cree k

Centre St

4 t h St NW

McKni ght Bl vd

The current Greenline BRT stops and proposed LRT stations along Centre Street create an opportunity for a small-scale transit-oriented development. The greatest density should be allocated to the 200m radius from stations through mixed-use and multi-family residential at 6 storeys. Density will be scaled downward to 4 storey residential in the 400 m radius and 3 storeys in the 600 m radius and beyond. The gradual scale will help to increase density, especially in terms of a main street corridor, while respecting the current neighbourhood fabric.

PRECEDENTS

FRUITVALE VILLAGE — OAKLAND (The Unity Council, ongoing)

An example of a community led TOD Located directly at BART station, this ~4 storey, mixed-use village layout provides community services, retail, and housing. While a vibrant plaza connectes to the station entrance

CAPITOL HILL STATION TOD — SEATTLE (Gerding Edlen, 2021)

Only ~2 acres of redevelopment around Link light rail Capitol Hill Station. Consists of: Four 7-storey mixed-use buildings Public plaza + community facilities 42% affordable housing Retail + farmer’s market space

THE BRIDGES — CALGARY (The City of Calgary, 2023)

A realistic, medium-density TOD implemented in an established innercity neighbourhood. Adjacent to the Bridgeland–Memorial Station A mix of mid-rise housing, retail, and parks with a strong public realm focus

ORENCO STATION — HILLSBORO (Pacific Realty Associates (PacTrust), 2003)

Located along the MAX light rail but is not dependent on towers. Instead it is known for its humanscale architecture, and mix of townhouses, apartments, and small homes. While the walkable street grid adds to the strong community identity.

5.3 CORNER & CORRIDOR CONNECTIONS INTERVENTION LOCATIONS

Concepts

64 t h Ave

Nose Hil l

fo or

Laycock Par k Bl ac kt horn Rd

S pyhill Rd Egert ’s Par k

Thorncl if fe CA

4 t h St NE

Nor th Haven CA

t 14 Stree

Bl ie ur La hn Jo

Nos e Cree k

Cent re S t

4 t h St NW

McK ni ght Bl vd

Nos e H ill

Mixed-Use Residential High-density Residential

PRECEDENTS

34TH AVE MARDA LOOP— CALGARY (The City of Calgary, 2025)

A community of refined retail and service spaces, in two original Calgary character homes. Designed to bring old world charm to the neighbourhood, with shops and stalls arranged around a central alleyway.

Centre Street: Create small scale mixed-use nodes that activate the street frontages, providing retail, services, and amenities that supports a complete community and aging-inplace. 4th Street: Less density than Centre St. but still provides some options for commercial through mixed-use buildings.

Nort hmount Dr

eN th Av 48

Mixed-Use Residential

Neighbourhood Commercial Live/Work

Edmonton Trail: Deemed as a “Neighbourhood Connector” in the North Hill Communities Local Area Plan characterized by a broad range of typologies ideal for small-scale commercial, live-work units, home-based businesses, and multi-family residential. 14th Street: Small pocket for mixed-use where commercial is existing nearby.

Neighbourhood Commercial Pockets of Commercial Corners House-to-commercial conversion opportunity to bring vibrant, convenient, and sustainable commercial to residential corners.

FIRE CLAY LOFTS— DENVER

LABREZZA RISTORANTE — CALGARY

BEAN ON 5TH — NORTH VANCOUVER

An inner-city infill of live/work units placed along street edges and block perimeters Connected through internal courtyards + pedestrian passages Mix of lofts, townhouses, and affordable units

An iconic house-converted restaurant located in the heart of Bridgeland. This small-scale commercial conversion gives a second life to an existing home.

Located on the corner of a quiet residential street, this houseconverted cafe brings ample life and vibrancy to the area. Its charming character, outdoor seating, and convenient location makes it a sought after neighbourhood destination.

( Urban Ventures, LLC, 2008)

(Marco Abdi, founded 1987)

(Annette Kim, founded 2019)

MAIN STREET LIVING Site Plan AFTER

BEFORE

Strategy Rezone to Mixed Use - Active Frontage (MU-2) to develop a Transit Oriented Development, main street corridor that functions as both an active pedestrian realm with direct access to the Green Line LRT station and multi-family residential living.

Northmount Dr

Thorncli ffe CA

Thorncliffe CA

Centre St

Centre S t

3D Aerial Current Zoning: Grade-Oriented Infill (R-CG) Current Use: Single-family residential Recommendations Require 100% active commercial frontage at grade along the full corridor facing the main street, with no gaps permitted for parkades, service entrances, or blank walls. Require a mix of unit sizes across all residential buildings: minimum 20% onebedroom or smaller, 40% two-bedroom, and 15% three-bedroom or larger. Apply a parking maximum within 400–600 m of the Green Line station, consistent with Calgary's TOD parking standards. Require all parking to be located underground or screened from the street.

Residential Commercial

6 storey apartments 6 storey Mixed Use Corridor

No rth mo unt Dr

C ent r e St

T ho rn c li ffe CA

3D Render BEFORE BEFORE

AFTER

Looking NE across Centre Street

NEIGHBOURHOOD CONNECTOR Site Plan

AFTER M c K ni g ht B lvd

M c K n ig ht Blvd

Sk y li ne Wes t

nt mo

nto

S k yli ne We st

Remains as Grade Oriented Housing (H-GO)

Tr l

Rezone from Grade Oriented Housing (H-GO) to Mixed Use - General (MU-2)

o Ed m

BEFORE

Strategy Rezone the top 7 parcels to MU-2 to develop a mixed use building with commercial at grade to activate the street. Leave the remaining parcels zoned as H-GO to allow for mixed multi-residential typologies, as well as live/work units to align with the NHCLAP ‘Neighbourhood Connector’ Urban Form.

3D Aerial Current Zoning: Grade Oriented Housing (H-GO) Current Use: Single-family residential

Recommendations Encourage at-grade uses to active, pedestrian-oriented categories: retail, food and beverage, personal services, galleries, studios, and small-scale health services. Apply reduced or shared parking standards given the mixed use and connector-street context. Locate all parking to the rear or underground. Require a minimum 15% affordable unit provision across H-GO parcels, prioritizing family-sized units and accessible ground-floor units to serve seniors. Consider density bonusing provisions to incentivize affordability beyond the minimum.

3 storey Stacked Townhouses with 2 storey Laneway housing in the back

4 storey Mixed-Use commercial at grade with 1 & 2 bedroom apartments above

3 storey 4 - Plexes with the option for live/work units at grade

nig McK

ht B

lvd

ne yli st k S e W

Ed m

ont

on T

3D Render

BEFORE

AFTER

Looking North along Edmonton Trail

5.4 CONTINUUM LIVING INTERVENTION LOCATIONS Nose Hil l

Laycock Par k

rfo

Spy hi ll Rd

Spyhil l Rd E ger t’s Park

Egert ’s Par k Nor thmount Dr

Nort h Haven CA

Ave

Thorncl if fe CA

4 t h St NE

Ave

Northmount Dr Thor nc li ffe CA

4 t h St NE

Laycoc k Park

Black thor n Rd

64 t h Av e

Nos e Hi ll

Bl ac kt horn Rd

INTERVENTION LOCATIONS

64 t h Ave

North Haven CA

McKni ght Bl vd

vd Bl ie ur La hn Jo

Bl ie ur La Jo

Nos e Cree k

Medium-Density Residential Concept- Aging-in-Place

Cent re St

4 t h St NW

Nos e Cree k

Cent re St

4 t h St NW

Mc Knight Blvd

Low-Density Residential

Multi-generational Housing Development

PRECEDENTS

Secondary/Laneway Housing Provide incentives, financial, and design assistance to promote development: Grants / low-interest loans especially for: Aging-in-place units Affordable rental units Relax restrictive rules: Increase allowable size Allow 2 storeys more broadly Reduce setback constraints where appropriate Rethink Parking Requirements: Eliminate minimum parking requirements in TOD areas Allow shared or tandem parking

WITHROW LANEWAY HOUSE — CALGARY (Studio North, 2017)

Demonstrates how backyard suites can add density in a subtle and context-sensitive way by using the laneway as the primary frontage. Multi-Generational Community Development Provides compact, affordable inner-city living Proposed multi-generational residential development targeted towards young Supports changing demographics, families and seniors that fits with current and adapts to future demographic needs. including seniors aging in place.

BRIDGE MEADOWS — PORTLAND (Bridge Meadows, 2011)

A intergenerational affordable housing development model with the goal to create stable, supportive “surrogate families” through housing design and programming. 9 family homes (4-bedroom townhouses) 27 affordable senior apartments

CONTINUUM LIVING: Multi-Generational Complex Site Plan

AFTER

T re lle Dr NE

BEFORE 60 t h Ave N E

T re ll e Dr NE

T ro l li nge r St N E

Strategy Rezone to Direct Control (DC) to develop a multi-generational residential development that addresses the aging population and families, adapting to the current and future demographic needs.

3D Aerial Current Zoning: Special Purpose - Future Urban Development (S-FUD) Current Use: Open space

Recommendations Mandate that 15–20% of all units be affordable to low- and moderateincome households, with priority for seniors on fixed incomes and young families, to prevent the site from serving only higher-income demographics Require a range of unit sizes, including accessible one-bedroom units for seniors, larger two, three, and four bedroom units for families, and universal at-grade design standards. Encourage both rental and ownership tenure, including non-market housing options (co-operatives, land trusts) to support long-term affordability and community stability across generations.

6 storey apartment with up to 4 bedroom units

Shared community spaces on the first 2 levels

Ave

Accessibility surface parking

4 storey apartments with up to 3 bedroom units

Greenhouses + community garden

e Av

ell

Precedent + 3D Render STA | zwei+plus intergenerational living Vienna, Austria

BEFORE

AFTER

On the parcel looking NW

Focused on mixing age groups with both independence and mutual support Shared, landscaped courtyards + community gardens Ground floor dedicated to amenities: café, kindergarten, playroom, etc. Intergenerational programming pairs seniors with preschoolers for shared activities Flexible unit layouts support diverse household types (e.g., single parents co-living, families with semiindependent seniors) Overall goal: create a resilient, socially connected, multigenerational community through design

SUMMARY OF HOUSING INTERVENTIONS 64 t h Ave

Nose Hi ll NW

Laycock Park

Blackthorn Rd

rfo

Dr Spyhill Rd

Egert ’s Park Northmount Dr Thorncliffe CA

Bl ie ur La hn

No se Cr ee k

Cent re St

4 t h St NW

McKnight Blvd

Ave

4 t h St NE

North Ha ven CA

Mixed Use - General (MU-1)

Commercial Neighbourhood 1 (C-N1)

Grade-Oriented Infill (R-CG)

Contextual Medium Profile (M-C2)

Grade Oriented Housing (H-GO)

High Density Low Rise (M-H1)

Direct Control (DC)

No Zoning Modifier

6.0 CONCEPTS: OTHER LAND USE This section specifically deals with existing land uses that are not residential. They consist of commercial and institutional uses such as strip malls, grocery stores, schools, and community associations. In the communities, these are some of the most valued spaces, however, there is an opportunity to amplify the positives through thoughtful development and intervention. Utilizing our principles of Diversity, Inclusivity, and Connection, we aim to create vibrant, mixed-use hubs in the areas that are currently underutilized and building around the assets that these communities already hold.

Principle Alignment Mixed-Use Development

DIVERSE

Multi-family Residential

Affordable Seniors Housing

INCLUSIVE

Affordable Family Housing

Near Community Amenities

CONNECTED

Access to Transit

6.1 OVERVIEW Each proposed intervention in this concept is located within an existing parcel that is not a residential land use. The central idea is to diversify the uses within each parcel, making the most of the commercial and institutional space that already exist. We will achieve this through several strategies that propose adding additional buildings, redeveloping outdated sites, and reimagining how we use space. In this section, we will illustrate this concept with specific examples on existing sites. The following interventions can, and should be used as a guideline for the growth and development throughout the research area.

PROPOSED INTERVENTIONS

EXISTING 64 t h Ave

Laycock Park

Bl ackthorn Rd

Nose Hil l NW

l rfo

fo or

Spyhi l l Rd

Spyhi l l Rd E gert ’s Par k

Eger t’s Park Nor thmount Dr

Northmount Dr Thorncl i ffe CA

Thorncli f fe CA

North Haven CA

Ave

North Ha ven CA

4 t h St NE

Ave

4 t h St NE

Laycock Park

Bl ackt hor n Rd

Nose Hi l l

64 t h Ave

McK ni ght Bl vd

vd Bl ie

Nos e Cree k

Centre St

4 t h St NW

Nos e Cree k

Centre St

4 t h St NW

McKni ght Bl vd

C-COR3 - Auto-Orientated Commercial C-COR2 - Pedestrian/Auto-Orientated Commercial C-C1 - Community Commercial

S-CI - Community Institution

Partnership in Underutilized Space

Building Around Assets

S-SPR - School, Park, Recreation

Strip Mall Design Guidlines

Strengthen from the Heart

S-CS - Community Service

Commercial Hub

C-N2 - Local Commercial

DC - Direct Control

6.2 CHURCH REDESIGN - STREGTHEN FROM THE HEART DRAFT CONCEPT INTERVENTION LOCATIONS No

rfo

Laycock Par k

Blackthorn Rd

PRECEDENT

Nos e Hill

6 4 t h Ave

Spyhill Rd Egert’s Par k Northmount Dr Thorncliffe CA

Ave

North Haven CA

4 t h St NE

Bl ie ur La hn Jo

No se Cre ek

Cent r e St

4 t h St NW

McKnight Blvd

Church

OGDEN HUB:29, CALGARY (The Mustard Seed, 2025)

Community hub with housing for families experiencing homelessness 24 supportive housing units Multipurpose collaborative space on the ground floor Supportive services and educational services provided Daycare and worship space on site.

Concept Church sites across the world have been changing to better fit the needs of modern cities. There has been a movement deemed YIGBY (Yes in Gods Backyard) where churches are using their excess land for the development of affordable housing. The Church of Jesus Christ Latter-Day Saints could be an example of this change. Their large surface parking lot sits mostly unused for 6 days of the week. This space could be used for housing that will add more residents that can access the churches services directly. The revenue generated from the land sale or lease could be used by the church to update their facility, even redevelop it into a whole new layout at a smaller scale, allowing more residential buildings to be added.

6.3 PARTNERSHIPS IN UNDERUTILIZED SPACES DRAFT CONCEPT Urban Scale Schools HOW MUCH SPACE DOES A SCHOOL NEED?

School Area

Thorncliffe School, Calgary

Sunnyside School, Calgary

Grades: Area: Students: Student/ha:

Colonel Sanders School: Grades 1-4 192 students/ha

K-6 1.27 ha 175 138

Crosstown Elementary School, Vancouver

Schulhaus Scherr, Zurich

Grades: Area: Students: Student/ha:

Residential

North Haven School: Grades K-6 81 students/ha

K-6 2.42 ha 269 112

K-7 0.38 ha 477 1,255 Park

Mixed-Use

K-6 0.34 ha 330 971

Church

Many schools in our communities have a large amount of land area per student. This land is leased from the City by the Calgary Board of Education. We challenged the idea of how much space is needed by looking to successful precedents both in Calgary and abroad. As it turns out, our schools use much more land than what other cities would deem as necessary. This presents an opportunity to reimagine what we can do with this excess space.

DRAFT CONCEPT Urban Scale Schools

PRECEDENTS

INTERVENTION LOCATIONS NW

6 4 t h Ave

Laycock Park

r Blackt horn Rd

Nos e Hill

l rfo

Spyhil l Rd Egert ’s Park

BEARSPAW SURPLUS SCHOOL SITE, EDMONTON

Northmount Dr Thorncliffe CA

(Landmark Homes, 2014)

Ave

4 t h St NE

Nort h Haven CA

Bl ie ur La hn Jo

No se Cre ek

Ce nt re S t

4th St NW

M c Kn ig ht Blv d

Built on surplus school land via Edmonton’s First Place Program In 2006 Edmonton identified 20 surplus school sites Each was sold to a private developer Goal to build homes for first time buyers Community led engagement to ensure it fit into scale and context of neighborhood Second phase of this program is going forward with a focus on affordable housing.

Schools

Concept Subdivide: Release a portion of school land to be allocaterd for new development. Public/private partnership: Between city, developer, and community association Revenue Share: portion of land sale revenue go to upgrading or enhancing remaining school property Give Back: Developer must build a project that brings value to the community and compliments the schools (affordable housing for families, seniors, or single mothers, collaboration spaces, child care facilities)

YW TAYLOR FAMILY HOME, CALGARY (YW Foundation, 2024) Below market rentals catered to women and children 21 units Mix of 2 and 3 bedroom Parking and playground in courtyard Residents have access to YW family resources and services.

PROPOSED INTERVENTION

Site Plan

Strategy Take advantage of the surplus land of schools and community associations and partner with the City of Calgary to provide equitable housing in strategic places.

h Ha ven D nL

aur

ie B

lvd

r NW

Recommendations Make affordable housing discretionary uses in S-SPR Districts Build a partnership between the City of Calgary, an affordable housing provider, and North Haven School (CBE) Define share of lease revenue allocated to North Haven School Develop affordable family housing in defined development areas

Nort

Current Zoning: S-SPR Current Use: School

Joh

NORTH HAVEN SCHOOL

PROPOSED INTERVENTION

3D Aerial

Details Grades K-6 236 students Current School Area: 2.92 ha (81 students/ha) Reduced School Area: 2.43 ha (98 students/ha) 4 8 A ve

The schools in our study area have large amounts of underutilized land that could be redeveloped in ways that benefit the community. In this example, a portion of the schools land will be used to provide family-oriented affordable housing. A portion of the lease revenue will be directed to the school to upgrade its facilities. Even with the reduced land size, the school still has less students/ha then the surrounding institutions.

Residential

Multi-family Residential

Affordable Family Housing

Near Community Amenities

PROPOSED INTERVENTION

BEFORE

AFTER 3D Render

Looking SW from across 48 Ave NW

DRAFT CONCEPT - COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION (CA) INTERVENTION LOCATIONS

64 t h Ave

Laycock Park

r No

N o se Hil l

Bl ackthorn Rd

PRECEDENT

Spyhill Rd E gert’s Park Northmount Dr Thorncliffe CA

North Haven CA th

Ave

RED OAK PLACE, VANCOUVER (The Neighbourhood House, 2014)

Bl ie ur La Jo

No se Cre ek

Cen t re St

4 t h St N W

M cK n igh t B lvd

Adaptive reuse of two existing buildings The mixed use building attaches multiple uses to an existing community hall: 15 affordable seniors units Childcare center Performance and activity space

Community Association

Concept The Thorncliffe Community Association (CA) is the heart of the neighbourhood. It is a beloved, well used space that offers residents a place to gather and form bonds in their community. It’s land is leased from the city and it is adjacent to a future greenline station. In an effort to maximize the city’s investment in transit and take advantage of the services the community association offers, it would be an interesting experiment intensify the underdeveloped areas on the CA’s site.

Similar to the ideas presented for school land, portions of land could be developed in partnership with the city and an affordable housing developer to create projects that provide a community benefit and complement the services the CA provides.

PROPOSED INTERVENTION

THORNCLIFFE/ GREENVIEW COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION

Site Plan 56 Ave NE

Strategy Take advantage of the surplus land of schools and community associations and partner with the City of Calgary to provide equitable housing in the right places.

Recommendations Make affordable housing and commercial discretionary uses in S-SPR Districts Build a partnership between the City of Calgary, an affordable housing provider, and the Community Association Define share of lease revenue allocated to Community Association Develop community serving housing and commercial in defined development areas

Centre St

Current Zoning: S-SPR Current Use: Community Association

PROPOSED INTERVENTION 3D Aerial

PHASE 2

PHASE 1 A 56

Temporary Parkade, St. Lambert, Quebec

Details This project will consist of 3 development phases: Phase 1 - Temporary parkade Phase 2 - Mixed-use, Mixedincome appartment building Phase 3 - Mixed-use affordable Seniors housing With a Green Line LRT station right outside the door, there is a need to build up and capitalize on the transit investment. The Community Association acts as an anchor to this development, allowing us to justify creating complimentary uses around it. All proposed buildings will be constructed on surface parking lots.

Residential Commercial Ce

PHASE 3

Mixed-Use Development

Multi-family Residential

Affordable Seniors housing

Near Community Amenities

Access to Transit

PROPOSED INTERVENTION

BEFORE

AFTER

Looking NE from Center St. N

3D Render

Looking NE from Center St. N

6.4 COMMERCIAL HUB REDEVELOPMENT DRAFT CONCEPT - Commercial Hub INTERVENTION LOCATIONS No

64 t h Av e

Laycock Park

r Blackt horn Rd

Nos e Hill

l rfo

PRECEDENTS

Spyhi ll Rd Ege rt ’s Park

ARIA AT UNIVERSITY DISTRICT, CALGARY

Nort hmount Dr Thorncliffe CA

(GRACORP, 2017)

North Haven CA

Bl ie ur La

Mixed-use development that anchors University District 288 residential units Save on Foods grocery store Residential and public parking underground

No se Cre ek

C entr e S t

4 t h St N W

McK night Blv d

Ave

Large Commercial

HILLHURST FRESH CO, CALGARY

(Truman Homes, 2025) An urban scale mixed-use building that is anchored by Fresh Co at ground level. Multifamily residential integrated into the building Smaller commercial spaces along edges Public indoor parking accessible from the rear lane More compact form than typical grocery store can be scaled to fit context of community. Gives residents direct assess to groceries + other amenities

NORTHHILL CALGARY CO-OP

(GGA Architecture, 2026) Newly developed mixed-use building that is part of Co-op’s new building strategy. Facing 16th Ave NE Creates a consistent, porous street wall Public realm enhancements on sidewalk Public parking tucked behind the buildings Grade orientated dwellings along side Original Co-op stayed open during construction

PROPOSED INTERVENTION

Nor thmount Dr

Th or ne yc ro

Strategy Redevelop the former Safeway site (future Fresh Co.) into a mixed-use, urban scaled commercial hub.

Site Plan

4 St NW

FORMER SAFEWAY

ft D rN

Recommendations Emulate Calgary Co-op model for redeveloping auto-oriented grocery stores Use phased approach to keep existing grocery store open during construction Designate the area as a neighbourhood activity center in the LAP to align policy with its development Use Inclusive zonning to encourage a percentage of units to be affordable

Current Zoning: C-C1 Current Use: Commercial (Grocery Store)

54 Ave NW

Grocery stores have been evolving to better suit city settings. This concept diversifies uses by adding residential and additional services. The grocery store can stay operational during redevelopment and the development would be maximum 6 stories.

PROPOSED INTERVENTION PHASE 1

PHASE 2

3D Aerial

t 4S

rth

Thor neycroft Dr NW

Thorn eycroft Dr NW

rth

Residential Commercial No

Th orneycroft Dr NW

Details This project will consist of 3 development phases: Phase 1 - Mixed-use residential building with grocery store at grade and parkade Phase 2 - Mixed-use residential building with plaza and parkade Phase 3 - Mixed-use residential building

By developing the first phase on the existing surface parking lot, it will allow the existing grocery store to remain open until the first phase is completed. Once the new grocery store is operational, the next phase can commence.

rth

PHASE 3

Mixed-Use Development

Multi-family Residential

Near Community Amenities

Access to Transit

PROPOSED INTERVENTION

BEFORE

AFTER

RECAP

Looking SW from gas station

6.5 STRIP MALL DESIGN GUIDLINES

DRAFT CONCEPT - Layering Life in Nodes INTERVENTION LOCATIONS fo

No se H ill

r No

6 4 t h Av e

La yco ck Pa r k

B l a ck th o r n Rd

S pyh i l l Rd E ge r t’s Pa r k N o r th m o u n t Dr

T h o r n cl i f fe CA

N o r th H a ve n CA th

Ave

Bl ie ur La hn Jo

No se Cre ek

C entr e S t

4 t h St N W

McKnig ht Blv d

Concept All existing strip malls were built in the 60's70's and are in need of repair or replacement They are auto-oriented with large surface parking lots between the buildings and the sidewalk Most are on higher traffic volume streets These are the perfect places to add density and enhance the public realm Different uses should be layered on top of the commercial at grade with a priority on residential.

Small Commercial

PRECEDENTS HILLHURST 19+2, CALGARY

GENERAL BLOCK, CALGARY

(FAAS Architecture, 2023)

(FAAS Architecture, 2021)

Mixed-use building nestled in a lower density residential neighbourhood, Hillhurst 51 residential units Live/Work units on the side activating 2 Ave NW 3 commercial units at grade Design that complimented the community was a priority

Mixed-use building in Bridgeland 5 commercial units 3 food options at grade, 2 services on second floor Public realm enhancements spill out of the commercial space onto the side walk Uses materials that are consistant with the community context

RECENT CHANGES NEARBY 64 t h A ve

Layco ck Pa rk

rfo

N ose Hi ll

Black t h or n Rd

Spy h ill Rd E ger t ’s Pa rk N or t hm ou nt D r T h or ncl iffe CA

N o rt h H aven CA

eN th Av 48

Bl ie ur La hn Jo

Nos e Cree k

C en t re St

4th St NW

Mc Kn ig h t B lvd

4305 CENTER ST NW

(Unknown Developer, 2023)

Small Commercial

(2021)

(2023)

This is a recent commercial development that was brought up in our community workshop event. It was developed a few blocks south of our study area in 2023. Residents pointed it our as a successful example of new commercial, but they criticized that there was no residential added on top of the project. This plus residential is the perfect example of what we should be doing. Moving parking to the lane, enhancing the public realm and walkability, then layering additional uses on top to increase activation and vibrancy.

PROPOSED INTERVENTION

PELICAN PIER MALL Site Plan

Current Zoning: C-COR2 Current Use: Commercial

14 St NW

Strategy Provide guidelines for strip mall redevelopment along main streets into mixed use hubs.

Recommendations Move away from auto-oriented land use districts in favor of mixed use Any vehicle access shall be provided via the lane where available. No surface parking is permitted between the building and the street. A priority on public realm improvements (walkability, placemaking, seating, street trees) should be required in all development permits The city should consider incentives (accelerated approvals, tax reduction, waiving development fees) to expedite the redevelopment process

PROPOSED INTERVENTION

3D Aerial Details This project will consist of: Mixed-use residential building Commercial at grade Single level underground parkade accessed from the rear

The strip malls in the study area all reflect their time of development. The form is not inviting to pedestrians and limits the uses that can exist. New redevelopment guidelines will help to create vibrancy and walkability in the commercial spaces that once featured parking lots. Layering uses vertically helps to intensify the community in the areas that can tolerate additional density.

Residential Commercial

Mixed-Use Development

Multi-family Residential

PROPOSED INTERVENTION

BEFORE

AFTER

Looking NE from across 14 St NW

3D Render

Looking NE from across 14 St NW

6.6 BUILD AROUND EXISTING ASSETS PROPOSED INTERVENTION

CHINOOK SCHOOL OF MUSIC

Site Plan

Ha rth No

Current Zoning: C-N2 Current Use: Commercial (Cafe, Tattoo Studio, Music School)

Strategy Intensify around existing hubs by adding additional square footage and enhancing the public realm.

Recommendations Add an additional commercial building into the site to create more retail options at a small scale Remove existing surface parking lot and redirect the stalls to the street Create a plaza area for the commercial uses to spill out into Allow shared public space with movable seating

PROPOSED INTERVENTION

3D Aerial

Details Current parking stalls: 17 Proposed parking stalls: 6 Additional 2-story commercial building Retaining wall to address grade change

rth Hav en

Mixed-Use Development

Near Community Amenities

The Chinook School of Music neighbourhood commercial area is a beloved part of North Haven. Its steep topography creates a challenging site. The current solution of a surface parking lot is not the best use of space. Moving the parking to the street opens up space for life. The new building helps frame the new plaza. The second story opens into the plaza, while the first story opens to the street.

48 S

t NW

Commercial

PROPOSED INTERVENTION

BEFORE

Looking SW from intersection of 48 Ave NW & North Haven Dr

AFTER 3D Render

Looking SW from intersection of 48 Ave NW & North Haven Dr

Key Other Land Use Recommendations FOR THE COMMUNITY: FOR THE CITY: The community should encourage changes in their The City should incentivise mixed use development around neighbourhoods that bring more compact growth community hubs to expedite meaningful change Support new housing in the form of mixed-use buildings that are Adopt more pedestrian-friendly, mixed-use districts over autodeveloped in defined areas orientated zoning Stay involved in how their community evolves overtime with input The City should partner with schools and community at engagement events organizations to turn underutilized leased land into projects that Support projects that create high quality public space and deliver public benefit affordable housing

SUMMARY OF OTHER LAND USE DRAFT CONCEPTS

PROPOSED INTERVENTIONS 6 4 t h Ave

6 4 t h A ve N o se Hill

Layco ck Par k

N ose H ill

Laycock Par k

Black th or n Rd

Spy h ill Rd

No r thmo u nt D r

T ho rn cli ffe CA

T h or n clif fe CA

N or t h Haven CA th

Ave

N or th Haven CA 4 t h St NE

4 t h St NE

Mc K ni gh t Blvd

vd Bl ie hn

Nos e Cree k

C en t r e St

Nos e Cree k

Ce nt r e S t

4 t h St N W

4th St NW

McK nig h t Blvd

Eger t’s Par k N or t hm ou nt Dr

Ave

S py h ill Rd E ger t ’s Pa rk

r No

B lac k t h or n Rd

Large Commercial

Church

Partnership in Underutilized Space

Building Around Assets

Small Commercial

BRT

Strip Mall Design Guidlines

Strengthen from the Heart

Community Association

600 m Radius

Commercial Hub

Schools

7.0 CONCEPTS: OPEN SPACE This section delves into the concepts, interventions and strategies that specifically involve the open space system. The open space system is an important part of the community, contributing greatly to ecosystem services such as regulating temperatures, filtering water, pollination, and the mental, social, spiritual and physical wellbeing of community members. Open space in these communities is already robust, but there are still many opportunities to improve the open space quality. The open space concepts are organized as such: Urban Ecosystem, Parks for All, and Community Confluence, finishing with a detailed design strategy for Trafford Creek and Egert’s Park.

Principle Alignment

OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN 64 t h Ave

Tr affor d Cr eek

rfo

Laycock Park

Bl ackthor n Rd

DIVERSE

Nose Hill

Different types of play and exercise

Spyhi ll Rd Egert ’s Park Nort hmo unt Dr

INCLUSIVE

Open spaces that everyone can enjoy

Tho rncliffe CA

Connects people to destinations

Nort h Haven CA

4 t h St NE

eN th Av 48

McKnig ht Blv d

Connects wildlife habitat Enjoyed in all seasons

Centre St

No se Cre ek

4 t h St NW

CONNECTED

ADAPTABLE

Wildflowers & pollinator meadows “Parks for All” Existing pathways

New permeable pavement pathways New clay/mulch pathways

Other green space Stormwater Infrastructure (SWI) & low-impact design (LID) Trafford Creek & Nose Creek

Reduce the effects of climate change

7.1 URBAN ECOSYSTEM The urban ecosystem concept is based on the idea that nature and human society are not separate, as many may believe, but rather they are intertwined and cannot be separated - a concept called natureculture. This philosophy can be carried through the open space network, into the urban fabric, and even into your very homes. This concept supports nature, clean energy, and has great benefits to humans as well. Recommendations for the Community: Individuals with homes abutting open spaces should incorporate low cost bird friendly design measures Individuals should landscape their yards with native plants that support pollination where possible The community should spread native wildflower seeds across unused green spaces Community members and organizations may take advantage of green programs where possible Green programs such as: Clean Energy Improvement Program (CEIP): https://www.calgary.ca/environment/programs/cleanenergy-improvement-program.html Climate Equity Programs: https://www.calgary.ca/environment/programs/equity.html Farm the City: https://www.calgary.ca/environment/programs/farm-thecity.html Alberta Ecotrust Grants: https://albertaecotrust.com/grants Seniors Home Adaptation and Repair Program (SHARP): https://www.alberta.ca/seniors-home-adaptation-repairprogram ATCO Community Energy Fund: https://www.atco.com/enca/our-commitment/community/community-energyfund.html Local Improvements: https://www.calgary.ca/roads/localimprovements.html (paid for by local taxpayers but could be used to add street trees) Rain Barrel Rebates: https://www.calgary.ca/water/programs/rainbarrel.html

Recommendations for the City: The City should provide bonuses for development that implements bird friendly design The City shall not remove healthy mature trees that are on public property The City should try to obtain the Highland Golf course to create a park The City should employ wildflowers and pollinator plants in pocket parks instead of grass (still low maintenance!)

The Calgary, Toronto, and Vancouver (and more!) Bird Friendly Design Guidelines provide guidance for development and renovations that is conscientious of bird migration, living patterns, and sight.

“We have a lot of wildlife in this community. It’s really something special to here.”

URBAN ECOSYSTEM- KEY PRECEDENTS

MELBOURNE POLLINATOR CORRIDOR, AU (Community members, ongoing)

TORONTO RAVINE STRATEGY, CA (City of Toronto, 2017)

BURNHAM WILDLIFE CORRIDOR, US (City of Chicago, 2016)

The Melbourne Pollinator Corridor is an innovative, inner-city wildlife corridor that is transforming public realm with indigenous flora to support native pollinating insects and connect people to nature. Unused pieces of land of all shapes and sizes are transformed into simple, yet effective, pollinator gardens. This initiative is ongoing and fully created by the community members to support ecology in their neighbourhoods. In addition to the pockets of public greenspace, household gardens connect green patches to create full pollinator corridors.

Toronto’s ravines carry water, wildlife and people through dense urban areas. They show how important maintaining nature within the city is and they connect both natural areas to other natural areas and with urban areas. The city has made an effort to provide educational opportunities for Indigenous cultures, local history and local ecology as you walk along the ravine. Once thought of as dirty and unusable, the city’s concerted efforts changed people’s mindset about ravines and today they are prized and necessary for ecological, economic, and social values.

The Burnham Wildlife Corridor is a ribbon of urban wilderness running through Burnham Park near the downtown of Chicago. The native ecosystems provide healthy, diverse habitat for migratory birds and other wildlife, and offer opportunities for visitors to meaningfully connect to this revitalized public green space. The space is meant to inspire nature exploration, enjoyment, and stewardship. The park has five unique gathering spaces with artistic installations and seating areas, reflective of nature and culture, that serve as assembly grounds and resting points.

How to apply in our communities: Research native flowers - the province and city have published many documents Create awareness - many people don’t realize how easy and low maintenance it can be Plant native seed mixes - it’s that easy!

7.2 PARKS FOR ALL The “Parks for All” strategy is aimed at creating an open space network that encourages individuals of all ages and all abilities to be out in nature all year. This section presents a number of precedents and a catalogue of interventions along with suggested locations based on our analysis and community engagement. Recommendations for the Community: Recommendations for the City: The community should implement a local public art program The City should incorporate inclusive playground equipment The community should prioritize sport courts that can support when creating new playgrounds or upgrading existing a variety of sports and seasons over single program spaces playgrounds The community may put funds towards creative placemaking to The City should add more seating to large open spaces such as enhance parks and the public realm Egert’s Park and Laycock Park The City should consider adding lighting infrastructure in open spaces that is respectful of the natural environment “We have a lot of green space that does a bit but not enough... Our parks could be doing way more.”

Calgary Playground Review

PARKS FOR ALL - KEY PRECEDENTS

PARKSVILLE COMMUNITY PARK, BC (City of Parksville, 1923)

WINTER STATIONS, MONTREAL, QC (MASSIVART, 2020)

TRANSFER BEACH PARK, LADYSMITH, BC (Town of Ladysmith, 1988)

A vibrant community park home to amenities for people of all ages and abilities. The park is home to: Outdoor exercise equipment Playground & outdoor water park Accessible boardwalk Table games (e.g. chess) Pickle ball, baseball, beach volleyball courts Skate park Public washrooms Inclusive play equipment The park also hosts seasonal events like the annual Sand Castle Competition.

Montreal’s winter stations are unique warm and colourful interventions built on squares, parks, parking lots and vacant spaces to transform the winter experience and provide opportunities to pause. Each year there are different interventions including interactive art, lighting, seating, fire pits, skating and more. The premise is built upon getting people outside in winter and bringing colour and warmth to their daily lives.

This community gem is a major gathering spot for activities, events, leisure, and birthday parties. The park is home to: Picnic shelters Dog off-leash area Playground & outdoor water park Beach volleyball Quiet areas for sitting and relaxing Food trucks & concession Outdoor amphitheatre Public washrooms

PARKS FOR ALL - INTERVENTION CATALOGUE Habitat Systems, Oliver Woods, Nanaimo

Knox Mountain, Kelowna

Crescent Heights mini galleries

OUTDOOR EXERCISE

INDIGENOUS STORIES & ART

Outdoor exercise equipment is an inclusive way to get people exercising outdoors. It can be particularly helpful for seniors as a cost-free way to move and socialize. Suggested locations Extension to Egert’s Park Playground The lot @ 60 Ave/4th St NE

Since Time Immemorial Indigenous peoples have been using Nose Hill and the local watershed. Incorporating their stories and art is a great way to celebrate and support local Indigenous Culture. Suggested locations Egert’s Park Nose Creek Pathway Murals

ARTWORK

C&C Courts Inc

MULTI-SEASON, MULTI-SPORT

Artwork such as the rotating “Mini The communities currently have a Gallery” found in Calgary’s Crescent lot of baseball diamonds which are Heights is an easy and joyful way to useful, but not great during winter. feature local art. Experience at your Creating sports courts that can be own pace in any season. utilized for different sports and Suggested locations different seasons is ideal. Suggested locations Thorncliffe-Greenview CA Along Nose Creek Trail North Haven CA Egert’s Park Thorncliffe-Greenview CA Murals The lot @ 60 Ave/4th St NE The lot @ 60 Ave/4th St NE

PARKS FOR ALL - INTERVENTION CATALOGUE Coventy Hills, Calgary

Graham Project, Baltimore

Maffeo Sutton Park, Nanaimo

Prince‘s Island Park

PARKOUR

BUILT IN GAMES

INCLUSIVE EQUIPMENT

PICNIC SITES

Parkour can be a good way to get teenagers playing and moving outside. These can be small or large additions to parks and may be built with natural material. Suggested locations Tweed Street Playground School sites Extension to Egert’s Park Playground

Simple games made in paint on paths and crosswalks, or built in games like chess and ping pong can encourage different age groups to play. Suggested locations: Trafford Creek Trail + crossings on Norfolk and Northmount Dr Egert’s Park Thorncliffe CA

Inclusive equipment is a must in any large playground. Even small changes like removing steps helps. Suggested locations: Laycock Park Tweed Street Playground Extension to Egert’s Park Playground North Haven Green Park

Anything from benches, to built in tables to full picnic shelters that can be rented for revenue. Suggested locations: Laycock Park Along Nose Creek Pathway

PARKS FOR ALL - INTERVENTION CATALOGUE Collie River Valley

Halifax Boardwalk

Parks Calgary

Fire and Ice, BRacebridge, Ontario

AGILITY

SEASONAL FAIRS

CREATIVE SEATING

The community has a loot of dog parks, however most of them are just fields. Built-in agility is a great way to add extra value to dog parks. Suggested locations Egert’s Park Thorncliffe off-leash dog park North Haven off-leash dog park

Seasonal events give community members something to look forward to and draw people from all over the city to experience them. Suggested locations Tubing event at Toboggan Hill Street Fair on 56 Ave by Thorncliffe-Greenview CA

Seating of any kind can add tremendous value for people to be able to rest and enjoy more of the parks. Creative seating can also add to community identity. Suggested locations: Egert’s Park Thorncliffe-Greenview CA Laycock Park North Haven Green Park The lot @ 60 Ave/4th St NE

FIRE PITS & WARMING HUTS Fire pits can enable people to enjoy open spaces all year. Suggested locations: Laycock Park Thorncliffe CA North Haven CA

7.3 COMMUNITY CONFLUENCE This strategy is all about connecting the community to water. Confluence is the coming together of streams, and it’s fitting because Trafford Creek, Confederation Creek, McKnight Creek all converge at the edge of Greenview at the old Highland Golf site. Those creeks then travel along the edge of Greenview to meet Nose Creek. The Community Confluence strategy and interventions are key for addressing stormwater. Recommendations for the Community: Recommendations for the City: Individuals should use rain barrels and downspout planters on The City shall daylight Trafford Creek when the current their property stormwater pipes reach the end of their usable life Individuals may plant rain gardens in their yards to help slow and The City shall implement low-impact design measures when filter runoff repairing or improving streetscapes and infrastructure

“The snow and ice pools on the streets making it difficult to walk. Then come spring time, our streets turn into waterfalls.”

Img: Global News

COMMUNITY CONFLUENCE - KEY PRECEDENTS

GREEN CITY, CLEAN WATERS, PHILADELPHIA, PA (City of Philadelphia, ongoing)

SAWMILL RIVER, DARTMOUTH, NS (Dartmouth/District of Halifax, Ongoing)

Philadelphia realized they had a big problem with polluted stormwater and they came up with the Green City, Clean Waters program to use green infrastructure and to expand stormwater treatment capacity with traditional infrastructure improvements. They leads city design with green solutions to reduce stormwater pollution and create healthier, greener neighbourhoods. The program is ongoing and has already seen massive improvements in reduced flooding, system overflows and improved water quality.

Daylighting the Sawmill River is a current, integrated project in the District of Halifax with ecological, economic, and socio-cultural benefits. It restores wildlife habitat and corridors, connects trails to destinations, enabled intersection reconfigurations and improved and increased green spaces.

CONFEDERATION PARK, CALGARY (City of Calgary, 1967) This park is a prime example of thoughtful landscape architecture. The park seamlessly integrates the park and water systems and purposefully creates wildlife-friendly spaces. Confederation park is an example of how Egert’s Park could be if Trafford Creek gets daylit. And although Confederation Park is a good start, much of Confederation Creek is still contained to culverts and perhaps daylighting the rest of the creek could be seen in the future.

100

COMMUNITY CONFLUENCE - INTERVENTION CATALOGUE

gruppe F, Brondby, Denmark

Brampton, Ontario

Peters Hill, Boston

SW Resiliency Park, Hoboken New Jersey

RAIN GARDENS

BIOSWALES & GREEN GUTTERS

ABSORBENT PATHWAYS

PERMEABLE PAVEMENT

Rain gardens help to limit the amount of stormwater that enters local drainage system and can reduce local flooding. They help to filter water and reduce pollution as well as add scenery to otherwise grassy fields. Suggested locations: Almost any park in the neighbourhood Your own yards!

Bioswales act similarly to rain gardens in that they use nature to slow and filter water. Bioswales are added to street sides and parking lots. Suggested locations: As many streets and parking lots as possible but in particular those that experience the worst drainage, highlighted below

Less used pathways may be created in a variety of surfaces such as crushed gravel, clay mix, and bark mulch. Suggested locations Secondary paths at Egert’s Park

For pathways and plazas that must be paved, permeable pavement is preferred over traditional concrete. Suggested locations: Parking lots New plazas New paths at Egert’s Park

101

COMMUNITY CONFLUENCE - INTERVENTION CATALOGUE

Williams Engineering Building, Edmonton

Raincheck

GREEN ROOFS

RAIN BARRELS & DOWNSPOUT PLANTERS

Any new commercial and larger mixed-use development

Rain barrels are an easy way to reuse rainwater and reduce runoff in your yard. It also helps reduce the amount of city water you use and pay for. You can add a hose to your rain barrel to water your other plants. Suggested locations: Your own yard!

n/a

Philadelphia Green City, Clean Waters

TREE TRENCHES & SILVA CELLS

Tree trenches and silva cells use similar engineering to appear like a series of tree coffins on the street, but underneath is a webbed system that waters the trees with stormwater and use the trees to filter and store water. Suggested locations: Centre Street Commercial hubs & parking lots 4th St NW Around school sites

n/a

gruppe F, 2019

102

7.4 TRAFFORD CREEK & EGERT’S PARK CONCEPT The Trafford Creek and Egert’s Park design concept is an example of how “Urban Ecosystem,” “Parks for All,” and “Community Confluence” can all come into play on a single site. Daylighting Trafford Creek is of particular environmental, social and economic importance so this section will cover details on what that can look like. This concept supports our guiding principles - diverse, inclusive, connected and adaptable - and represents how these can look on the ground in our open spaces.

The historic watershed! “Daylighting the creek needs to happen. Being buried causes all sorts of problems.”

(1924) GOALS

RESTORE

Daylighting Trafford Creek will Improve this local wildlife corridor Act as natural stormwater management and reduce pooling in pathways and flooding of properties Provide socio-economic opportunities

PAUSE

Increased seating, tables, and trail bridges will offer moments of resprise and rest New views of the creek and riparian area

ENGAGE

Additional programming will encourage a mix of park uses for all ages and abilities Artwork and storytelling will bring moments to learn and engage

103

WHAT IS DAYLIGHTING?

EXAMPLES OF CREEKS THAT WERE BURIED, DAYLIT, AND ONCE AGAIN ARE THRIVING ECOSYSTEMS

Daylighting a creek is simply the act of taking rivers that were buried as cities grew and restoring them back to the surface. The Trafford Creek Pipes were built in the 60s - this aged infrastructure is approaching its end of life. Rather than replacing the pipes, let’s daylight the Creek. Most of Trafford Creek is under publicly owned lands! BENEFITS Addresses flooding concerns Slows water movement Reduces water choke points Reduce polluted runoff Economic benefits Water out of pipe system Reduced water treatment costs Less culvert maintenance Can be cost effective when compared to replacing failing pipe/culvert, and long term is cheaper Need less flood insurance Improved water quality Improved habitat & return to original wildlife corridor More adaptable to climate change

TATLOW CREEK, VANCOUVER

CHALLENGES Excavation of old materials Adjacent infrastructure makes it no longer possible to restore the flood plain and riparian zone Obtaining funding High capital cost -American Rivers, Daylighting Streams Report, 2016 PADDEN CREEK, BELLINGHAM

104

WHAT ARE RIPARIAN AREAS? Trafford Creek is an ephemeral (intermittent) stream so it will only be filled with water for part of the year. However, restoring the riparian areawill still be important for habitat stabilization. Riparian areas form a transition zone between aquatic and dry, upland habitats: A combined presence and abundance of water, either on or close to the surface Vegetation that responds, requires and survives well with abundant water Soils that are modified by abundant water, stream or wetland processes and lush, productive and diverse vegetation (Government of BC, 2025) Recommended species for this region:

(Gov of AB & Gov of Can, n.d. ) This is an intermittent creek in Calgary. Although it is not actively running, it maintains a high level of moisture, so water loving plants are necessary.

105

TRAFFORD CREEK + EGERT’S PARK - Site Plan + Programming BEFORE

3D AERIAL PLAN Nose Hi ll

14 th

Blackthorn Rd

rfo

Spyhill Rd Egert’s Park

Northmount Dr

St N

W M cK ni gh tB lv d

North Haven CA

Knig

ht Blvd

4 t h St NW

106

TRAFFORD CREEK + EGERT’S PARK - Site Plan + Programming

CONCEPTUAL PROGRAMMING

EGERT’S PARK & TRAFFORD CREEK CONCEPT

AFTER

REFL EN

fo or

Nose Hill

GE SE

EXCE SE

14 th

Norfolk W

Spyhill Rd

Existing deciduous tree Existing coniferous tree New Path - permeable pavement 4 t h St NW

New Path - Clay or mulch Existing path

Topography

unt

Traffford Creek

rth

Culvert Riparian Area* - water friendly plantings

48 th

Play extension - all ages & abilities

Dog agility Rain gardens McKnight Blvd

Indigenous art/storytelling *general guide

107

TRAFFORD CREEK + EGERT’S PARK - Site Plan + Programming Culvert Play extension - all ages & abilities fo

r No

Indigenous Art/Storytelling

Norfolk W

Dog agility

+ rotating art installations and built in games along the path

Riparian Area* New Path - Gravel/Clay

New Path - Permeable Pavement

Rain Gardens

This is a conceptualization of the interventions that could go in Egert’s Park along with daylighting Trafford Creek. Because the current pathway is at the lowest point in topography, it is where the creek originally ran. Therefore, when the creek is brought to light, the new path will built adjacent to the creek. Another note is that the riparian area shown is a general guide based on averages. A technical study would need to be done to find out the exact width at every point of the creek. Additionally, the trees shown are the current trees and may not do well with the reintroduction of the creek so, if in good health, those trees could be moved higher up in Egert’s Park.

108

TRAFFORD CREEK + EGERT’S PARK - Sections + Renders

SECTION A - LOOKING TOWARDS NOSE HIILL KEY MAP WATER FLOW

Permeable Pavement Pathway

Semi Permeable Rubber Surfacing

RIPARIAN AREA

This section shows Trafford Creek and Egert’s Park Playground with the proposed new additions and a trail bridge over the creek. Rather than pooling on the pathway, water and snow will permeate into the creek instead making it safer to walk and needing less shovelling by the City.

109

TRAFFORD CREEK + EGERT’S PARK - Sections + Renders

KEY MAP

N o rf o lk

SECTION B - RAIN GARDENS ON THE HILL

HIGH WATER LINE

WATER FLOW

This is a very large section to show that the rain gardens have minimal impact on the off leash and field usage of the park, but will be greatly benefiicial in slowing and filtering water on this hill.

110

TRAFFORD CREEK + EGERT’S PARK - Sections + Renders RENDER FACING EAST BEFORE

AFTER

111

8.0 CONCEPTS: MOBILITY This section will go over proposed interventions for Thorncliffe–Greenview–North Haven. It will look at aspects such as transit, safety and traffic calming measures for the community including designs based on the analysis section of this paper. It will then set out a list of policies that can be used at the community and city scale to help improve transit connections and safety around school zones.

64 t h Ave

rfo

Blackthor n Rd

Laycock Park

Nose Hill

Spyhill Rd

48th Ave @ North Haven Drive Traffic Calming

Eger t’s Par k

John Laurie Roundabout and Overpass

Nor thmount Dr Thor ncliffe CA

Ave

Thorncliffe School Traffic Calming Measures

4 t h St NE

John Laurie Bus Stop

McKnight Blvd

Blv

Centr e St

rie

No se Cr ee k

4 t h St NW

u La

112

8.1 OBJECTIVES

INCLUSIVITY AND ACCESSIBILITY

SAFETY

Mobility ensures any resident can get to their essential needs, travel to or from work / school, and have leisure time in the community

Mobility ensures people can get to where they need to go using different mobility options while ensuring their safety

DIVERSITY

PLACE MAKING

Mobility ensures people from diverse backgrounds have an equal playing field when moving into the neighbouhood. It also means diversity in terms of transportation options

Mobility isn’t just about getting from A to B, it’s also about the journey along the way. Part of mobility is ensuring that the places traveled enroute are places you can take 5 minutes to pause, and enjoy the scenery

113

8.2 OVERVIEW

64 t h Ave

La ycock Pa rk

r No

Bl ackthorn Rd

Nose Hil l

Spyhil l Rd Egert’s Pa rk Northmount Dr Thornclif fe CA 4 t h St NE

Ave

Centre St

No se Cre ek

4 t h St NW

McKni ght Blvd

Proposed Bus Stop

Pathways Connections / Overpasses

Proposed Intervention 3

Proposed Intervention 1

Proposed Intervention 2

Proposed MultiModal Network

Proposed Bus Route

114

From East to West 8.3 FROM EAST TO WEST Saddletowne Station 64 t h Ave

rfo

La ycock Pa rk

Dr Bla ckt horn Rd

Nose Hi ll

64 Ave

Spyhill Rd

Egert’s Pa rk

Ave

T hornclif fe CA

4 t h St NE

Brentwood Station

Nor thmount Dr

McKnight Blv d

Centre St

Nos e Cre ek

4 t h St NW

Proposed Bus Route

Proposed Bus Stop

PRECEDENTS

(Regional Transit, n.d.)

MAX PURPLE - CALGARY Max Purple provides a dedicated east-west bus connection from downtown Calgary to Chestermere. Is a rapid transit route but doesn’t terminate at any of the transit stations. Important since terminus points don’t determine whether a route is classed as BRT Helps in connecting Chestermere to Calgary

(Martin, 2024)

MAX ORANGE - CALGARY Max Orange provides a dedicated east-west bus connection from Saddletowne Station to Brentwood Station. However, having a second version of this would Build an East - West connection through the community of Thorncliffe - Greenview North Haven and decrease commute times to places like UofC Help ease demand on the BRT lines which are already at or beyond capacity

Allowing both east–west and north–south bus directions generate a grid-style transportation link, and that produces some very sensible benefits for a community: 1. Enhanced exposure and accessibility With routes moving in both directions, more individuals live inside a short stride of transport. You’re not required to journey toward a single centre just to go someplace nearby in an alternative direction. 2. More direct trips (less backtracking) As an alternative of taking a winding path through a key station, transportation users can travel more clearly across town. For instance, departing from the northeast to the northwest doesn’t involve traveling downtown first. 3. Easier transfers A grid forms predictable intersection spots where routes intersect. This formulates transfers that are simpler and quicker, just get off one bus and grab another travelling the opposite way.

115

8.4 SAFETY THROUGH TRAFFIC CALMING 64 t h Ave

rfo

Blackt hor n Rd

Laycock Park

Nose Hi ll

Spy hill Rd Eger t’s Par k Nor thmount Dr Thorncl iffe CA

Ave

4 t h St NE

Mc Knight Blv d

Blv

Centr e S t

No se Cre ek

4 t h St NW

a nL

Proposed Intervention 1

Proposed Intervention 2

Proposed Intervention 3

Traffic Medians (Refuge Islands) Grant a sheltered “waiting area” so walkers and cyclists can traverse one route of travel at a time Decrease traversing distance and contact to moving vehicles Help consolidate traffic flow and hinder unsafe passing or turning activities Lower crash levels by stopping head-on crashes (notably with raised medians) Curb Bump-Outs (Curb Extensions) Reduce crossing distance, shrinking the amount of time pedestrians are inside the roadway Strengthen visibility among pedestrians and motorists by eliminating parked-car obstructions Easily slow turning cars by constricting corner radii Stop illegal or risky parking near crossings

116

PRECEDENTS

(Traffic Calming Curbs Installed in Sarnia, 2019)

TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CALMING, SARNIA, ONTARIO Sarnia, Ontario installed temporary traffic calming measures that could be removed, and moved at any time It improves safety for kids travelling to schools Pedestrians crossing have a shorter distance to travel Makes crossing gauds more visible

(Castillo, 2022)

BLOCK PARTIES - CALGARY Calgary implemented a new traffic calming policy that originally included speed bumps and cub extensions. It has been expanded to make streets more cycle and scooter friendly while building a sense of communities. It forces people to Slow down It improves safety Builds connections between residents

(Traffic Calming Measures Aim to Curb Safety Risks, 2025)

CITY OF WINNIPEG Winnipeg installed traffic calming curbs in 16 different locations around the city. By narowing sections of the road it forces residents to Slow down Decreases crossing distance for residents Ensures drivers are paying attention

(Chicanes, 2022)

ST JOHNS, NEWFOUNDLAND The town of St. Johns implemented Chicanes to help in traffic calming through the city. It has similar mechanisms as the other examples where it Narrows the road Forces people to pay attention Great for local roads with high volumes

117

64 t h Ave

fo or

Blackt horn Rd

Laycock Park

Nose Hi l l

Spyhill Rd Egert ’s Park Northmount Dr

Ave

4 t h St NE

Thorncliffe CA

McKnight Blvd

ur La hn Jo

Centre St

No se Cr ee k

4 t h St NW

Proposed Intervention 1

Proposed Intervention 2

Proposed Intervention 3

Dedicated and shared right turn lanes help keep traffic progressing. Vehicles turning right withdraw from the main traffic lane, so cars moving straight are not obligated to reduce speed or halt behind them. Moreover, when a motorist suddenly reduces speed to turn right in a split lane, it can trigger crashes. A distinct lane or one shared and one separated through lane eliminates that hazard. It also can reduce crossing gaps if the typical island crossing is eliminated, and the lane is brought closer to the curb. Traffic circles on the other hand reduce head-on and fast-speed T-bone accidents. Most crashes turn out to be “low-velocity merging or sideswipe incidents, which are normally less dangerous.

118

(Median Islands, 2022)

ST. JOHNS, NEWFOUNDLAND MEDIAN ISLANDS Elevated island around the centerline that tapers the travel lane Works on arterial, collector, or local roads Can serve a secondary purpose, to act as a pedestrian/bicyclist shelter if built around a pedestrian crossing, bike facility, or communal crossing Very little impact on traffic volume May necessitate removal of street parking and moving of drainage and utilities

(McKenzie Towne Roundabout, 2026)

MCKENZIE TOWNE ROUNDABOUT, CALGARY Aids in slowing down traffic while allowing comfortable maneuvering Works on arterial and collector roads Can be utilized on intersections with large volumes of trucks and buses Allows for the movement of emergency vehicles and can be put on a emergency response route Cost depends on design but is similar to a traffic signal

(SANDS | Data Catalogue, n.d.)

53 AVE NE @ 11 ST NE Collector road intersecting a main arterial road in an industrial area. Rounded corners with multi-use marked crosswalk Doesn’t mandate bicyclist to dismount before traversing Diagonal offset requires pedestrians and cyclists to enter the sidewalk before crossing a second time

MCKNIGHT BLVD @ CENTRE ST NW, RIGHT TURN / STRAIGHT LANE Forced right turn makes sure cars stop before the stop line, and don’t creep into the pedestrian crossing Helps decrease the quantity of pedestrian / bicycle collisions Provides other lanes a clear route without any disruption to traffic flow Doesn’t require byclists to dismount before crossing

119

8.5 PATHWAYS TO DESTINATIONS INTERVENTION LOCATIONS

6 4 t h Av e

r No

Dr Laycock Par k

Blackt horn Rd

Nose Hill

Spyh ill Rd Eger t’s Park Nor thmount Dr Thorn cliffe CA

Ave

4 t h St NE

Bl ie ur La hn Jo

No se Cr ee k

Centr e S t

4 t h S t NW

McKnight Blvd

New sidewalks Existing pathways New official pathways Multi-modal network Improved pedestrian intersections (e.g. overpass, direct crossings)

Pathways connecting communities help in transit accessibility, create more direct routes, true multimodal integration, better access to parks and open space, and improved equity and accessibility. Paths can cut in parks, along water courses, or amid blocks where streets don’t connect. That reduces travel time and prevents voyages along high-traffic roads— crucial for families, seniors, and less experienced cyclists.

120

HIGH RIVER OPEN SPACE MASTER PLAN (High River, 2020)

This plan takes a holistic approach to connect all of High Rivers open spaces, trails, and ecological habitats It connects to local community context, features story walks, placemaking guidance, amenities and main streets

WINTER BIKING, QUEBEC CITY, QC (Vélo Québec, 1995) In Quebec winter biking is encouraged and the province has a network that spans over 5,000 kilometers and though 382 municipalities. They also provide a guide that covers active lighting, proper tires, travel speeds proper brakes, saddles, and maintenance

KELOWNA WATERFRONT PROMENADE, BC

PARKWAY TRAIL, NANAIMO, BC

(City of Kelowna, 2002)

(City of Nanaimo, 1997)

2 km pathway that traces the edge of Okanagan Lake, linking five of Kelowna’s signature parks Fully paved walkway invites visitors to walk, bike, or roll from park to park, with views, gardens, and opportunities to pause Destinations and features include: Picnic areas Sport courts & playgrounds Concession Library, sauna, bars & restaurants

The Parkway Trail connects the North and South ends of the city with ~ 20km of continuous trail (Parkway Trail | Tourism Nanaimo, n.d.). It also Promotes active mobility Provides safe connections along a major highway Creates noise sheltering by putting a natural barrier between the road and trail Generates a scenic ride that’s great for commuting or just going out for a leisurely ride

121

8.6 48TH AVE @ NORTH HAVEN DR TRAFFIC CALMING Before

Google Maps, 2026

Section A-A’

After

cti

By creating curb bump-outs in combination with raised crosswalks and medians along 48th Ave @ North Haven Drive, we’ll be preventing several issues. Firstly, the community was worried about speeding within school zones. Medians help narrow the road and cause drivers to naturally go slower while being more cautious on the road. Additionally, curb bump-outs also narrow the road but help make pedestrians more visible while decreasing the amount of time they are exposed to vehicles. In combination with this, the raised crosswalks will ensure visibility throughout the traverse while ensuring that motorists come to a complete stop before the stop sign, and

A-A ’

and don’t roll through it. Additionally, vehicles traveling from the east will be coming from the roundabout proposed at McKnight @ John Laurie and will be slowed down by that in combination with the raised median. Policy 4.1.1 All new schools must have visible crossing features that decrease the probability of a pedestrian-vehicle collision.

122

8.7 THORNCLIFFE SCHOOL TRAFFIC CALMING Before

Section A-A’

Google Maps, 2026

After

Section B-B’

*Visualization assisted by Adobe Photoshops AI Tool - Firefly*

Similar to North Haven School, Thorncliffe School could benefit from a combination of raised medians and curb bump outs. Putting raised medians on both sides of the school will help narrow the road and make sure people aren’t speeding through the school zone. They also restrict mid-block U-turns or dangerous left turns close to schools. In addition to this, if you take out parking and promote alternative transit, the extra space can be

reorganized to facilitate cycle lanes, broader sidewalks, or buffer areas. After all, parking typically is not required except for school events. Otherwise, parents only need space to drop off their kids if they decide to drive. Policy 4.1.2 All new schools must have at least one form of traffic calming while promoting alternative transit options.

123

Section C-C’ 4 t h St NW

Northmount Dr

No r th mo u nt D r No rt h mou n t D r

Section B-B’

124

8.8 JOHN LAURIE @ MCKNIGHT INTERVENTION Before

Seeton, 2026

After

*Visualization assisted by Adobe Photoshops AI Tool - Firefly*

The proposed roundabout at John Laurie @ McKnight in concert with the pedestrian overpass will serve multiple purposes. Firstly, the overpass brings pedestrians off the street level and makes pedestrian-vehicle incidents non-existent. While it is a large initial cost, the decrease in emergency calls due to pedestrian incidents will aid in saving lives and money.

The roundabout also aids in a similar manner. Roundabouts are known to prevent head-on collisions which can save lives. They also act as a natural traffic calming method as motorists need to slow down to enter. A roundabout in this intersection will also remedy the long wait times associated with this intersection. Policy 4.1.3 The city shall bring pedestrians above or below the grade of vehicles where feasible.

125

8.9 JOHN LAURIE BUS STOP Before

Google Maps, 2026

After

Putting a bus stop in this locale would generate briefer, more express walking paths to the bus stop improve ridership. Right now, John Laurie acts as a manmade barrier that cuts off part of the community and could be prevented by opening this barrier. In doing so, would also get natural surveillance which Jane Jacobs refers to as “eyes on the street”. It also decreases the physical division between the community and public infrastructure such as bus stops. Moreover, it provides an opportunity to insert landscaping, benches, or illumination instead of maintaining an obstacle.

Given the extent of the proposed route, accessibility was a primary concern. To help mitigate this a pathway is being proposed from the northbound side up to the existing houses while also connecting to the existing pedestrian overpass. The same treatment will be given to the southbound side while making sure it’s accessible to all ages and abilities. Policy 4.1.4 The city shall connect all communities that are split by arterial roads with public transit and multi-modal connections which are well marked and accessible to all ages and abilities.

126

64 t h Ave

rfo

Laycock Park Bl ackthorn Rd

Nose Hill

Spyhill Rd Egert’s Park Northmount Dr Thornclif fe CA

Ave

4 t h St NE

McKnight Blvd

No se Cr ee k

Centre St

4 t h St NW

n oh

rie

127

8.9.1 MOBILITY SUMMARY

64 t h Ave

rfo

Dr Blackthorn Rd

Laycock Park

Nose Hil l

Spyhil l Rd Egert’s Par k

Northmount Dr Thorncl iffe CA

Ave

4 t h St NE

Mc Kni ght Blvd

Centr e St

No se Cr ee k

4 t h St NW

48th Ave @ North Haven Drive Traffic Calming

John Laurie Bus Stop

John Laurie Roundabout and Overpass

Thorncliffe School Traffic Calming Measures

128

9.0 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:OPEN HOUSE Our final community engagement event for the project was an open house at the North Haven Community Association. We were able to showcase our proposed design interventions to community members and get feedback on what people liked, disliked, or thought did not align with their neighbourhood. As a class, we constructed a scale model of the community to help people visualize the location of each intervention. We placed scanable QR codes on the location of an intervention that linked to images that helped to illustrate our concept.

9.1 WHAT WE HEARD Starting with the negatives, we received a few comments on overall positive reviews for our mobility interventions. The traffic calming density throughout the communities. Some residents disliked the around schools made sense to a lot of people. A few suggested idea of anything other than a single family home or duplex going up adding traffic calming to other parts of the community to help slow mid-block, next to other single family homes. They cited parking, traffic throughout. A couple residents were impressed with the traffic impact of shadows, and affected views as the main complaints circle and overpass at John Laurie and McKnight Blvd, citing that it against it. The other criticism we faced was a resident concerned was a sensible solution to one of the biggest mobility issues in the about the reduction of green space around schools and community area. Lastly, people were very excited about our open space design associations. They cited that these are well used areas that provide a concepts. They really appreciated the inventory of possible park benefit to the community and it would be a shame to take them interventions that were laid out next to key maps. A few residents away. mentioned that it really helped them visualize how much better their open space could be. The intervention that attracted the most Community members had a lot of positive feedback to share with us. positive feedback was daylighting Trafford Creek. A lot of residents They were receptive of directing density towards main streets and were not aware of the historic creek bed and were excited by the adding mixed-use buildings to commercial hubs. Multiple people notion of adding a naturalized area into their already beloved parks. cited that the single family homes along Centre St were neglected Many said that it could help with storm water management and that and needed to be replaced and they were excited about the idea of they would be inclined to visit more regularly if it were developed. City adding more commercial uses into the area. The same sentiment Councillor DJ Kelly was so impressed that he asked for our research. was shared with our strip mall design guidelines. Although some residents are fond of a particular business in the existing strip malls, Overall, the feedback we received from the open house was positive. they agree that they are outdated and would serve the community Community members were appreciative of our work and happy to better with a refreshed design. A few residents stated that the strip have some fresh perspective directed towards their neighbourhoods. malls were the perfect place to add housing. There were many

129

130

10.0 CONCLUSIONS North Haven and Thorncliffe/Greenview stand at a pivotal moment, one that carries both urgency and genuine opportunity. The challenges these communities face, from aging infrastructure and population stagnation to a lack of guiding policy frameworks, are real and pressing. Yet so too is the potential for meaningful, character-sensitive renewal. Through a process grounded in rigorous analysis, deep community engagement, and design thinking rooted in the principle of sonder, the recognition that every resident carries a unique and valuable story, Sonder Consultants have worked alongside these communities to chart a path forward. The Open House marked a critical milestone in this process, offering the broader community a final opportunity to engage with the draft concepts and make their voices heard. As with any honest planning process, the feedback we received was nuanced. Some residents expressed reservations about increased density and reduction of green space. These concerns have been heard and taken seriously, and they serve as an important reminder that growth must be pursued thoughtfully, with genuine respect for the qualities that make these neighbourhoods worth investing in. At the same time, the Open House generated a great deal of enthusiasm and affirmed that the direction of this work resonates with residents. Community members were broadly supportive of concentrating density along main streets and introducing mixed-use development into commercial hubs. Traffic calming measures and the proposal to daylight Trafford Creek also generated a significant amount of positive feedback.

Organized around the four focus areas of Housing, Other Land Use, Open Space, and Mobility, and guided by the principles of being Diverse, Inclusive, Connected, and Adaptable, this work offers a clear and actionable roadmap for repositioning these neighbourhoods as complete communities and vibrant destinations within Calgary's evolving urban fabric. Overall, the feedback received from interested parties was a reflection of a community that is engaged, thoughtful, and ready to participate in shaping its own future. Community members were appreciative of the work undertaken on their behalf and welcomed the fresh perspective brought to the neighbourhoods they call home. It is our hope that this document serves as a living resource, a foundation upon which residents, community associations, and the City of Calgary can continue to build a future for these communities that directs growth, vibrancy, and livability in a way that is as meaningful and layered as the people who call them home.

The strategies, interventions, and recommendations outlined in this document are not imposed solutions, but co-created responses to what the people of North Haven and Thorncliffe/Greenview told us they need and value.

131

REFERENCES

American Rivers. (2016, May 25). Daylighting streams: breathing life into urban streams and communities. American Rivers. https://www.americanrivers.org/report/daylighting-streams-breathing-life-urban-streamscommunities/#:~:text=Daylighting%2C%20furthermore%2C%20provides%20economic%20benefits,up%20and%20causes%20localized% 20flooding.&text=Additional%20research%20and%20monitoring%20efforts,allowing%20for%20more%20comprehensive%20guidance.&t ext=A%20comprehensive%20database%20with%20a,vastly%20assist%20stream%20daylighting%20implementation.&text=Policies%20a nd%20funding%20which%20make,make%20these%20more%20common%20practices. AQI. (2026). Calgary historical air quality index. AQI.in.ca. https://www.aqi.in/ca/dashboard/canada/alberta/calgary/historical-analysis Calgary Metropolitan Region Board. (2024). Calgary region environmentally sensitive areas. [Data set]. Bow River Basin Council. https://brbc.ab.ca/environmentally-sensitive-areas Calgary Board of Education. (Multiple Dates). Enrolment Numbers. https://cbe.ab.ca/news-centre/Pages/calgary-board-of-educationreleases-the-enrolment-report-2025.aspx ChatGPT. (n.d.). ChatGPT. Retrieved April 13, 2026, from https://chatgpt.com/ City of Calgary. (2021). Greenview Community Profile.https://www.calgary.ca/communities/profiles/greenview.html City of Calgary. (2021). North Haven Community Profile.https://www.calgary.ca/communities/profiles/northhaven.html City of Calgary. (2021). North Haven Upper Community Profile.https://www.calgary.ca/communities/profiles/northhavenupper.html City of Calgary. (2021). Thorncliffe Community Profile. https://www.calgary.ca/communities/profiles/thorncliffe.html City of Calgary. (December, 2022). North Hill Communities Local Area Plan. https://www.calgary.ca/planning/local-area/completedplans/north-hill-communities.html. City of Calgary. (2026). Residential solar calculator. [Data set]. City of Calgary. https://www.calgary.ca/content/www/test/custom/solarcalculator/solar-calculator.html City of Calgary. (Multiple dates). Open data catalog. City of Calgary. https://data.calgary.ca/browse?sortBy=newest&page=1&pageSize=20 CREB. Jan, 2026. City of Calgary Monthly Snapshot. Retrieved from: https://www.creb.com/Housing_Statistics/

132

Friedman, A., Pollock, A. (2024). Fundamentals of Planning Cities for Healthy Living (2nd ed.). Anthem Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv307fh7v Government of AB & Government of Canada (n.d.). Planning your riparian planting project in Alberta. Government of Alberta and Government of Canada. https://www.awes-ab.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/293-riparian_planting-factsheet-FINAL-1.pdf Government of BC. (2025, June 3). Riparian areas. Government of British Columbia. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/industry/agriculture-seafood/agricultural-land-and-environment/water/riparian-areas iNaturalist Contributors. (2026). iNaturalist research-grade observations. iNaturalist. https://www.inaturalist.org/ Meteoblue. (2026). Simulated historical climate and weather data for Calgary. Meteoblue by Windy.com. https://www.meteoblue.com/en/weather/historyclimate/climatemodelled/calgary_canada_5913490 Realtor.ca. 2026. Map of property listings in Calgary, Alberta. Retrieved February 7, 2026, from https://www.realtor.ca. Spatial and Numeric Data Services. (Multiple dates). Calgary Community Census. https://sands.ucalgary.ca/datacatalogue.php?q=Census%20and%20Society/Calgary%20Community%20Census Stadt Zurich. (2026). Schule Scherr: Portrait. https://www.stadtzuerich.ch/schulen/de/scherr/ueberuns/portrait.html#:~:text=Zahlen%20und%20Fakten,um%20das%20Wohl%20der%20Kinder. Vancouver School Board. (October 21, 2024). 2024-2025 Capacity and Enrolment Data. https://www.vsb.bc.ca/2024-2025-capacity-andenrolment-data

133