Your insurance and community partner We hire local, shop local, and support community members and charities through donations and sponsorship We take pride in investing back into the community we share
grandriverinsurance.ca · 2176-B Chiefswood Rd, Ohsweken Call us today for a free quote (519) 445-2795
Home | Auto | Commercial | Pensions | Group | Risk Management
THE SPIRIT OF ALL NATIONS WEDNESDAY June 21st, 2023 | www.tworowtimes.com | 519-900-5535 | Grand River Territory | FREE
1045 Brant County Hwy 54 Ohsweken 519-770-3628
Haudenosaunee Development Institute loses another court battle for HCCC in land claim intervenor motion Men’s Fire wins bid to stop HDI, Mississaugas of the Credit granted intervenor status
NAHNDA GARLOW
nahnda@tworowtimes.com
TWO ROW TIMES
Hear Right hearrightcanada.ca
Under Treaty Rights First Nations people are entitled to receive Hearing Aids at no cost. Come see us for details. STATE OF THE ART PRODUCTS & EQUIPMENT COMPLIMENTARY HEARING TESTS CERTIFIED PROFESSIONALS LIFETIME FREE ADJUSTMENTS & CLEANING HEARING AIDS KEEP THE MIND EXERCISED AND SHARP! DON’T LET HEARING PROBLEMS STOP YOU FROM BEING PART OF THE FAMILY! WE ARE PLEASED TO ANNOUNCE OUR TEAM IN CALEDONIA Kelly Gadoury Hearing Instrument Specialist
Tara Harview Hearing Consultant
322 Argyle St South, Caledonia 289-757-7777 6 Parkview Rd, Hagersville (Located Inside Morison Insurance) 1-844-233-4317
Come see us for great savings
SALES • SERVICE • PARTS
SNOWMOBILES • SIDE X SIDES • ATVS • MOTORCYCLES • JET SKIS • LAWN MOWERS
1264 COLBORNE ST. EAST, BRANTFORD, ONTARIO PHONE
519.759.8140
TORONTO — The Haudenosaunee Development Institute has lost yet another legal battle on behalf of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy Chiefs Council, this time being told by an Ontario court that their latest attempt to intervene in Six Nations land claim case was an ‘abuse of process’. Justice J.T. Akbarali issued her 20-page decision on Wednesday afternoon — ruling that HDI would not be granted intervenor status in the Six Nations land claim. “In my view, HDIs interest in this proceeding was never to represent the Haudenosaunee Confederacy more broadly,” wrote Akbarali. “…HDI seeks to advance HCCCs interest in positioning itself as the legitimate governing body of the Six Nations people within the Grand River community. It’s efforts to do so have been litigated and rejected three times.” Akbarali wrote that HDIs draft pleading, which they later withdrew from the case, wanted Ontario courts to declare that the band council was not entitled to any of the relief sought in the land claim
— and instead was asking for an order directing Ontario and Canada to negotiate the settlement with the HCCC instead. “In its draft pleading and as affirmed on cross-examinations, HDI has stated what it seeks to do: it wants to derail SNGRs litigation and displace SNGR in favour of HCCC as the counterparty to negotiations with the defendants. In other words, HCCC seeks to use HDI to challenge the governance of SNGR through this proceeding,” wrote Akbarali. “Understood in this way, HCCCs interest, which HDI seeks to represent, is not genuine to the litigation,” said the judge. “HDI does not seek to participate in the litigation as a good faith actor, to advance it to its adjudicated conclusion in an organized, efficient and just manner. I am satisfied on the evidence before me that HCCCs true interest and goal in seeking to intervene as a party through its delegate HDI is to cause delay and disruption for its ulterior purpose of challenging and undermining SNGRs right to lead the Six Nations community.” Sources with SNGR told 2RT the loss was a significant one for HDI, and that HDIs legal team
was unsuccessful on every point they argued. The judge also called out HCCCs use of the HDI to create a false impression that they are not attorning to the jurisdiction of Ontario. “…HCCCs rejection of Canada’s judicial system does not mean it can engage with that system through a delegate to frustrate the rights of another Indigenous group that chooses to access Canada’s judicial system to make its own claims against [Ontario and Canada],” wrote the judge. The judge also wrote that HCCCs interest in stepping into the land claim case was not a genuine effort to take part in the land claim case as a party but rather an attack on three lawsuits throughout history that dismissed their challenges to the band council governing the community. Justice Akbarali cited three lawsuits including a fairly unknown attempt by HCCC Secretary Leroy Jock Hill in 1998, Hill v Canada, to sue for a declaration that SNGRs surrender for a parcel of land was null and void because the HCCC did not accept it. Hill lost that case and never appealed, further cementing the authority of the elected band council
June 21 is National Indigenous Peoples Day, a time for self-education, and a day to celebrate and reflect on the contributions of Indigenous people in Ontario and beyond.
over the Six Nations of the Grand River Territory. Hill was initially set to file an affidavit in the intervenor motion but in a late decision, that affidavit was removed from HDIs materials. Akbarali said HDI had committed an abuse of process through the intervenor hearing to challenge the governance of the Six Nations community and that if she had not already dismissed the motion on the grounds that HDI was not deemed an acceptable representative body, that she would have dismissed it on an abuse of process. The Mississaugas of the Credit were successful in their motion and will be added to the land claim with specific restrictions in place. Akbarali said MCFN cannot make any counterclaims, crossclaims or third-party claims and will seek no relief in the Six Nations land claim. MCFN can still oppose relief that is sought by other parties if it believes that is a breech of its own treaty rights. The Men’s Fire also won on their motion to intervene on HDIs intervention motion. Men’s Fire were not seeking to be added to the land claim on their own, only to oppose the HDI being named representatives for
the entire Haudenosaunee Confederacy. Akbarali granted the Men’s Fire status to intervene in HDIs motion. In her decision, Akbarali wrote that the Men’s Fire motion to be added as a party to the land claim was dismissed. Lawyer for the Men’s Fire Jeffrey Kaufman told 2RT this was an error and that the Men’s Fire did not file a motion to be added to the land claim, only a motion to stop HDI from being added. Kaufman said that error would be corrected when the final orders from the decision are issued by the judge. A source with the Men’s Fire told 2RT they were pleased with the outcome. The judge found that the Men’s Fire is an important representative part of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy and that they have a direct and genuine interest in their motion to intervene and oppose HDI claiming to act on their behalf, without their consent. The judge pointed out that once the Men’s Fire evidence and arguments against HDI had already been filed with the courts, HDI then pulled back and changed its representation order request to only speak on behalf of the HCCC — a move
MONIQUE TAYLOR MPP HAMILTON MOUNTAIN 905-388-9734 mtaylor-co@ndp.on.ca
CONTINUED ON PAGE 5 PM42686517