UMSU continues anti-Palestinian racism definition talks Students line outside chambers, emergency status of motion contested Alicia Rose, staff
D
ozens lined up outside the UMSU council chambers waiting to attend the most recent UMSU board meeting on March 28 which saw deliberation on motion 0604, a proposal for UMSU to adopt the Arab Canadian Lawyer’s Association’s (ACLA) definition of anti-Palestinian racism. The line extended around the hall, but a sign on the room’s door stated it had a capacity of 75, including UMSU board and staff, meaning only some of those waiting gained entry to the meeting itself. The governance committee was granted the opportunity to give a presentation on the matter, but deferred it to “a student at large, and any students that wish to present,” said Charli Feener, UMSU governance committee chair. They said after presentations were completed, there would be a “consultation period.” “I do want to reiterate, that this is not a discussion, but rather a chance for students to voice their opinions, their concerns, their perspectives,” said Feener. A vote on the motion was not scheduled for the meeting and did not take place. Emily Kalo, a student representing the Jewish community, said the community had been given little notice to prepare for presentations and argued that discussion of the motion should not have taken place that night. “Rather, it should be had over the weeks to come, through true consultation, where both communities have the opportunity to compare and contrast with one another, before coming to the board of directors,” said Kalo. Vaibhav Varma, UMSU vice president finance and operations, challenged the emergency status of the motion. Varma said the motion did not “satisfy [the] requirements” of being an emergency, as the board had voted already to discuss it in future meetings.
News
photos / Ebunoluwa Akinbo / staff
Varma said governance not supposed to be brought said the reason she granted should have allowed “appro- forward to the board, and the motion emergency status priate time to engage in con- was not included in the board was to give “an opportunity to sultative proallow people to cess with all a part of the “Apparently it was an open session, but the be relevant stakeconsultation doors were closed” holders and process, and parties, rather to allow that to than thrust- — Roleen Alarab, UM student who proposed motion be an inclusive ing this on the experience.” board of directors at the very members’ packages. After a 17-3 vote to continue last minute.” Board of directors’ chair- the meeting and presentaVarma said the motion was person Elbethel Masresha tions, Varma said he believed
Research & 3 Technology
4 Editorial
6 Comment
that Masresha “has a conflict of interest, and clear personal position,” and as such, was “not fit to chair this delegation” on the basis of social media posts he said indicated bias. Masresha left the meeting, saying, “my capacity to chair has been consistently undermined.” After Masresha left, Tracy Karuhogo, UMSU president, assumed the position of interim chair to continue the meeting. When the meeting resumed following a recess, Varma announced his resignation from his position as vice president finance and operations, a position which was set to end soon after the end of the winter semester. He did not say whether the conflict of the meeting was a factor in his decision. Following this, a vote was held on whether to adjourn the meeting due to the conflict, which did not pass. The meeting continued after Brendan Scott, director of Bannatyne operations, was voted as interim chair for the remainder of the meeting. The meeting allowed members of each community an equal amount of time to present. Roleen Alarab, the student who brought the motion forward, said there was miscommunication about the board meeting’s capacity. “There was definitely overcrowding, or even difficulty hearing, because apparently it was an open session, but the doors were closed,” she said. “So, the people outside, that were waiting for the entire duration of the meeting didn’t know what was happening inside.” Alarab said that the presentations during the meeting were a “catalyst for solidarity and understanding.” “They invited others to see through our eyes, feel our heartbeats and share our dreams of justice and equality,” she said.
Arts & 8 Culture
14
Access denied
Go with your gut
Changing channels
The pen is mightier
‘Let’s go hand in hand’
U of W pushes schedule after cyberattack
UM panel connects IBD and the brain
Critiquing media vital for social change
U of M film prof on HonestReporting Canada
UM theatre does a modern take on Shakespeare
April 03, 2024
SINCE 1914
VOL. 110, NO. 28