Issuu

taos news

s sept. 17, 2026

leyendas L

tradiciones special edition

h o n o ra r a n u e st ro s h É ro e s

contents

4 8 12 When justice failed The Tolby murder and the Colfax County War

From vigilantes to mounties

Before America

Northern New Mexico had centuries of history before the Declaration of Independence

How frontier justice was replaced with professional law enforcement

n Northern New Mexico, history and legend have always walked side by side. This year’s Leyendas reaches across centuries, from a Northern New Mexico whose story was already well underway in 1776 to the turbulent territorial years of land disputes, unsolved murders, vigilante justice and the eventual rise of professional law enforcement. These stories remind us that our past is complicated, sometimes unsettling and deeply connected to the places around us. Behind every legend are real people and communities whose experiences helped shape the Northern New Mexico we know today. We hope you enjoy this journey into the history, mysteries and enduring legends of El Norte.

Ellen Miller-Goins, magazine editor

leyendas

CONQUEST OF NEW MEXICO, PAGE 13

L E G E N D S

ROBIN MARTIN, OWNER

CHRIS WOOD, ADVERTISING DIRECTOR

SHANE ATKINSON, SALES MANAGER

SEAN LINTON, COLLECTIONS

CHRIS BAKER, PUBLISHER

MARY CHÁVEZ, BUSINESS MANAGER

ISABEL PEÑA MEDIA SPECIALIST

GEOFFREY PLANT, EDITOR

SHAWN ROBERTS, CIRCULATION DIRECTOR

MELISSA TYLER CLASSIFIEDS

ELLEN MILLER-GOINS, MAGAZINE EDITOR

LINDSEY RAE GJORDING, MEDIA SPECIALIST

HEATHER OWEN, DIGITAL EDITOR

PAUL GUTCHES, CREATIVE DIRECTOR

LYLE PADILLA ASSISTANT CIRCULATION MANAGER

TRADICIONES: LEYENDAS

EMILY SENDER, COPY EDITOR

TAOS NEWS 226 ALBRIGHT ST. TAOS, NM 87571 575-758-2241 TAOSNEWS.COM

SARA KOLLIG, PRODUCTION MANAGER JASON RODRIGUEZ, SHERRY HERN GRAPHIC DESIGN

TA O S N E W S / S E P T. 1 7, 2 0 2 6

I’ve worked as an educator, administrator business owner, your State Representative and your Senator for over 40 years. Through it all I’ve held one guiding principle:

Awarded for Excellence. Inspired by You.

Serving my fellow Taoseños and neighbors.

Wanda Lucero, Your Taos State Farm Agent Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there.®

Honored to be Taos’ Best Agency 16 Years Running

575-737-5433 wanda@wandalucero.com

UNSUNG HEROES In the October 8th issue.

If I can help, please call me at 575-770-3178.

Roberto “Bobby” J. Gonzales

Lee and Adelita Gonzales, 2026 Unsung Heroes

State Senator, District 6 Democrat

Paid for by the Committee to Re-Elect Roberto “Bobby” J. Gonzales, Roberto “Bobby” J. Gonzales Treasurer

LEGENDARY

COMMITMENT

TO COMMUNITY WE’RE INVESTING IN COMMUNITY.

Kit Carson Electric Cooperative invested more than $277,000 in contributions to support community projects across its service territory, reinforcing its commitment to the people and places it serves. Through these contributions, KCEC continues to enhance the quality of life in our rural communities by supporting initiatives that strengthen local infrastructure, education, economic development, and community well-being.

For a complete list of donations and contributions, visit kitcarson.com. KCEC contributed more than $50,000 in 2026!

For more information, please visit kitcarson.com Kit Carson Electric is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

5. TRADICIONES: LEYENDAS

TA O S N E W S / S E P T. 1 7, 2 0 2 6

THE REVEREND FRANKLIN J TOLBY had come west from Indiana after the Methodist Episcopal Church sought

a missionary for the growing communities around Cimarron and the Moreno Valley. He arrived with Mary and their daughters, Rachel and Grace, to establish and strengthen churches in Cimarron and Elizabethtown.

TRADICIONES: LEYENDAS

TA O S N E W S / S E P T. 1 7, 2 0 2 6

When justice failed The Tolby murder and the Colfax County War BY ELLEN MILLER-GOINS

he road from Elizabethtown descended through Cimarron Canyon beneath timbered slopes and towering rock formations. The Rev. Franklin J. Tolby knew the route well. The Methodist missionary regularly traveled between the mining settlement in the Moreno Valley and his home in Cimarron, where his wife, Mary, and their two young daughters waited for him. Tolby left Elizabethtown on Tuesday, Sept. 14, 1875, after conducting church work. He never made it home. Two days later, passersby found his body beside the canyon road. Contemporary newspapers reported that he had been shot twice. A later account described additional wounds, but details in the surviving accounts varied. Examiners also disagreed over whether one person had fired both shots or whether the bullets had come from different directions. Tolby’s horse remained nearby. His saddle and possessions had not been stolen. Whatever had happened in the canyon, robbery did not appear to be the motive. The minister’s assassination became the flashpoint for the most violent period of the Colfax County War, a struggle involving land, political power, race and competing ideas of justice. Tolby’s friends demanded that the law find his killers. When officials appeared unable or unwilling to do so, armed citizens began conducting their own investigation. Within weeks, three more men were dead. Potential witnesses could no longer be questioned. The evidence had become hopelessly tangled with rumor, coercion and revenge. Instead of delivering justice, the pursuit of Tolby’s killers helped destroy any realistic chance of learning who killed him and whether anyone had ordered his death.

A PREACHER ENTERS THE CONFLICT Tolby had come west from Indiana after the Methodist Episcopal Church sought a missionary for the growing communities around Cimarron and the Moreno Valley. He arrived with Mary and their daughters, Rachel and Grace, to establish and strengthen churches in Cimarron and Elizabethtown. He did not confine himself to the pulpit. Tolby became involved in the social and political disputes dividing Colfax County. He spoke on behalf of miners, ranchers and settlers resisting the Maxwell Land Grant and Railway Company, and he took an interest in the treatment of Native people in the region. Soon after his arrival, he wrote

home with enthusiasm about his new surroundings. “Cimarron is destined to be the leading city of New Mexico. The word Cimarron is the Spanish for wild, and the city takes its name from the river.” The name would prove grimly appropriate. The conflict predated Tolby. Its origins lay partly in an enormous Mexican land grant made to Charles Beaubien and Guadalupe Miranda in 1841. Lucien Maxwell, who married Beaubien’s daughter, eventually gained control of the property and operated it through an informal network of purchases, leases, shared production and personal agreements. Under Maxwell, miners, farmers and ranchers settled across the grant. Some bought property. Others worked land with his consent but without formal deeds. Still others regarded distant portions of the sprawling estate as public land open to homesteading or mining. That ambiguity became dangerous after Maxwell sold his interest and foreign investors formed the Maxwell Land Grant and Railway Company. The company wanted clearer control over the land and its resources. It sought payments from residents, challenged mining claims and attempted to remove people it considered squatters. Settlers who had built homes, farms and livelihoods there resisted. The federal government’s failure to resolve questions about the grant’s legal status and boundaries added to the instability. The resulting trouble is often divided into two overlapping conflicts. The Maxwell Land Grant War concerned ownership and use of the grant itself. The Colfax County War more directly involved control of county government and opposition to the influential political alliance known as the Santa Fe Ring. In practice, the issues were difficult to separate. Company officials held public office or maintained close ties to powerful territorial leaders. Residents who challenged the company often believed they were also challenging a political system that controlled elections, appointments, courts and law enforcement. By 1875, the bitterness extended far beyond disagreements over property lines..

LEFT: A MAXWELL LAND GRANT AD. RIGHT: LUCIEN MAXWELL.

MAXWELL LAND GRANT MAP FROM THE FOLSOM MUSEUM FACEBOOK PAGE

A COUNTY DIVIDED Tolby emerged as an outspoken opponent of the political and business interests associated with the grant. His public criticism made him popular with settlers and miners, but it also gave him powerful enemies. The political atmosphere was especially tense after the territorial election of Sept. 6, 1875. Supporters of territorial delegate Stephen Elkins were accused of ballot tampering in Colfax County. A MAXWELL LAND GRANT CERTIFICATE.

TRADICIONES: LEYENDAS

TA O S N E W S / S E P T. 1 7, 2 0 2 6

1897 PEN-AND-INK AND WASH ILLUSTRATION TITLED "THEM THREE MEXICANS IS ELIMINATED" BY THE AMERICAN ARTIST FREDERIC REMINGTON.TON. / WIKIPEDIA COMMONS

Melvin Mills, backed by the territorial establishment, defeated anti-Ring attorney Frank Springer for a legislative seat. Dr. Robert Longwill, a former Maxwell company manager and ally of the Santa Fe political machine, won reelection as probate judge. The probate judge was among the county’s most powerful officials. The office combined judicial duties with broad administrative authority over schools, public money, jury lists and elections. A Cimarron newspaper later described Longwill’s position as “pretty near equal to king.” Tolby’s murder came eight days after the election.

FROM THE LAS VEGAS GAZETTE, SEPTEMBER 18, 1875.

His political activity immediately fed suspicion that the assassination had been arranged by people who wanted to silence him. Yet another possible motive had nothing directly to do with the land company.

PANCHO GRIEGO / COURTESY

Shortly before his death, Tolby reportedly intervened when Francisco “Pancho” Griego assaulted another man. Tolby helped the injured man and threatened to report the attack. Because he was an important outside witness, some believed Griego or his associates had wanted to prevent him from testifying. Other theories circulated, but none produced clear evidence. Tolby was buried in the cemetery south of Cimarron with honors reflecting his service as a senior deacon in the local Masonic Lodge. His widow and daughters stayed temporarily with friends before leaving New Mexico. Clay Allison, the feared rancher and gunfighter, called on Mary Tolby. According to a later recollection, Allison behaved courteously, gave her money and

offered further assistance. Mary and the girls departed Cimarron on Thursday, Oct. 28, 1875 and returned to Indiana. Behind them, Tolby’s friends were losing patience.

WAITING FOR THE LAW Fifty-four Colfax County residents petitioned territorial Gov. Samuel Axtell to offer a reward for the capture and conviction of the killers. On Thursday, Oct. 7, Axtell announced a $500 reward “for the apprehension and conviction of the perpetrators of this dreadful crime.” But an effective official investigation failed to materialize. Those legally responsible for identifying and prosecuting the killers appeared to make little progress. The Rev. Oscar P. McMains, who had assisted Tolby and assumed some of his duties, began investigating on his own. Suspicion centered on Cruz Vega, the recently elected constable for one of the county precincts, and Manuel Cardenas, a man with a violent reputation. Vega had carried mail along the route between Elizabethtown and Cimarron around the time of the murder. McMains believed he knew something about the crime. McMains enlisted local men, including Allison, and arranged for Vega to guard a cornfield along Ponil Creek. On Saturday night, Oct. 30, disguised men seized Vega near a campfire. They placed a rope around his neck and took him into the trees, where a larger group waited. This was not an arrest. McMains had no law enforcement authority, no warrant and no secure way to control the armed men he had assembled. The group demanded information. Accounts indicate that Vega named Cardenas in connection with the murder. What else he said, and under what degree of coercion, would remain disputed. At some point McMains left or was separated from the group and the remaining men hanged Vega from a telegraph pole. His body was later found battered and marked by the rope. Newspapers called the gathering a vigilance committee or lynch mob. The New Mexican condemned the killing as “a disgrace to our people” and warned of further bloodshed between Hispanic and Anglo residents. The warning proved accurate. Vega’s death sharpened the racial dimensions of the conflict. He was Mexican-born and Spanish-speaking. Contemporary accounts associated members of the mob with the Anglo and Texas faction opposing the Santa Fe Ring. Even people who believed

TRADICIONES: LEYENDAS

Vega had information about Tolby’s death could see that he had been denied any meaningful legal process. McMains and 14 other men were charged in Vega’s killing, although McMains was the only one ultimately prosecuted. His defenders argued that he had intended to question Vega, not kill him, and had not been present for the hanging. Whatever his intention, McMains had turned a suspected witness over to an angry, armed crowd. The result was not justice but another unsolved killing.

REVENGE IN CIMARRON Pancho Griego was related to Vega and reportedly blamed Allison for the lynching. Griego threatened to kill him. On Monday, Nov. 1, the two men confronted each other in Cimarron. Allison shot Griego and claimed he had acted in selfdefense. At a hearing nine days later, no witnesses appeared for the prosecution, and Allison was released after the killing was ruled justifiable. Caffey noted that, given the reported presence of Texans in town, the decision was likely popular and perhaps prudent. Historian Caffey described Allison’s relationship with the law as ambiguous. He did not necessarily regard himself as an outlaw and sometimes submitted to legal proceedings. But he was inclined to confront threats personally rather than rely on officers or courts. Former territorial Gov. Miguel Otero recalled that Allison could be pleasant when sober but became “a terror to the whole neighborhood” under the influence of alcohol. By then, attention had shifted to Cardenas. Questioned in Elizabethtown, Cardenas gave a sworn statement accusing Vega of shooting Tolby for $500. He claimed the money had been supplied by Longwill, Mills, Florencio Donoghue and Griego. According to Cardenas, Longwill had approached him first, but Vega ultimately accepted the assignment. The statement appeared to confirm the settlers’ darkest suspicions: Tolby had been assassinated by hired men acting for politically connected figures. But the evidence was deeply compromised. After being taken to Cimarron, Cardenas recanted. He said the statement had been forced from him at gunpoint. One of the men involved in questioning him insisted that Cardenas had been assured he would not be harmed

but acknowledged placing a gun on the table during the interrogation. Other testimony raised additional questions about Cardenas. Witnesses claimed he had spoken of Tolby’s death before the news became widely known and could not satisfactorily account for his whereabouts. At a preliminary hearing on Wednesday, Nov. 10, Cardenas was ordered held for grand jury action. Donoghue was also held as an alleged accessory and allowed to post bail. Charges against Mills were dismissed for insufficient evidence. Longwill had fled, first obtaining protection at Fort Union before continuing to Santa Fe. Cardenas never reached a grand jury. As officers moved him back toward the jail, armed men waited nearby. A shot rang out, killing him. The crowd scattered before soldiers sent from Fort Union could intervene. No one admitted firing the fatal bullet. Allison and an Elizabethtown vigilante were among those later suspected, but the identity of the gunman was never established.

THE EVIDENCE DISAPPEARS In less than two weeks, Vega had been lynched, Griego had been shot and Cardenas had been assassinated in custody. All three had been named in one version or another of the Tolby case. All three were now beyond questioning. The Rev. Thomas Harwood, Tolby’s Methodist superior, later concluded that the amateur investigation had buried the truth. “If there were others mixed up in the case other than the three who lost their lives as heretofore given, I have always thought the unwise methods of McMains helped to cover up the tracks of evidence and they have never been found,” Harwood said. That may be the central tragedy of the Tolby murder. Citizens turned to vigilantism because they believed public institutions were compromised or ineffective. Their distrust reflected documented political entanglements. The Santa Fe Ring exercised extensive influence in territorial government, while Maxwell company allies held important local offices. Federal uncertainty over the grant had left settlers, investors and Native people competing for control of the same land and resources. But violence did not correct those failures. It eliminated suspects and witnesses. It deepened racial ten-

sions. It allowed armed factions to influence court proceedings and made every confession vulnerable to claims of coercion. Each killing created another grievance demanding revenge. The Colfax County War continued beyond the Tolby crisis. Opposition to the Santa Fe Ring eventually weakened its control of county affairs, while the larger legal struggle over the Maxwell Land Grant continued for years. The U.S. Supreme Court ultimately upheld the grant’s validity in 1887, although violence and evictions persisted. Whether the turmoil constituted a “war” has long been debated. It was not a conventional military campaign. Caffey noted that one reference work characterized it as “a series of single murders.” Yet those murders arose from a sustained conflict over land, government and power, and their frequency during 1875 and 1876 gave the Cimarron country every appearance of a place at war with itself. Tolby’s assassination remains unsolved. The surviving record supports competing theories: Griego may have wanted Tolby killed to prevent him from testifying about the assault, or allies of the Santa Fe Ring may have arranged the assassination to silence a critic. Vega and Cardenas were both suspected of participating in the killing. The available evidence proves none of those theories conclusively. What is certain is that the institutions charged with delivering justice failed to resolve the crime. The citizens who attempted to replace those institutions failed as well. By the time the gunfire subsided, Tolby was still dead, his family was gone and the men who might have explained what happened in Cimarron Canyon had taken their secrets to their graves. ★

SOURCES Caffey, David L. “When Cimarron Meant Wild: The Maxwell Land Grant Conflict in New Mexico and Colorado.” University of Oklahoma Press. Introduction; Chapter 7, “The Tolby Murder and Its Aftermath”; Chapter 8, “A Town in Turmoil.” “Colfax County War.” Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, last edited July 27, 2026. Used for background chronology and the later history of the Maxwell Land Grant conflict. Robinson, Quentin. “His Death Started a Bloody War.” Tippecanoe County Historical Association, 2026. Used for biographical background on Franklin J. Tolby and the aftermath of his murder.

TA O S N E W S / S E P T. 1 7, 2 0 2 6

Taos Pueblo A living Legacy

Unesc

orld W o

i te eS g a Herit

SINCE 1992

Taos Pueblo was designated a National Historic Landmark in 1965 and recognized as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1992, honoring its extraordinary historical, cultural and architectural significance as one of the world’s most important and enduring Native American communities.

Home Office, Email, Shopping, etc.

Taos Pueblo Hours: Sunday—Saturday 9am—4pm Winter hours are subject to change. Please see events calendar for any changes to schedule.

www.taospueblo.com

Where the Past

Rides with Us. In Taos County, generations of tradition, culture and connection to the land continue to shape the road ahead.

TRADICIONES: LEYENDAS

TA O S N E W S / S E P T. 1 7, 2 0 2 6

From vigilantes to mounties How New Mexico replaced frontier justice with professional law enforcement BY ELLEN MILLER-GOINS

he 1875 murder of the Rev. Franklin Tolby, a Methodist missionary and outspoken critic of the Maxwell Land Grant and Railway Company, plunged Colfax County into one of Northern New Mexico’s most notorious episodes of frontier violence — and exposed the limits of a justice system struggling to keep pace with a rapidly changing territory. Citizens who believed territorial authorities had failed to identify Tolby’s killers formed vigilance committees and pursued their own version of justice. Cruz Vega was tortured

and lynched; Manuel Cardenas, another suspect who implicated prominent local men, was shot dead while being taken from the jail to the courtroom. Several more men died, and Tolby’s murder remained unsolved. Across territorial New Mexico, county sheriffs struggled to patrol enormous counties with few deputies, limited budgets and little support. Military troops sometimes filled the gap; citizens formed posses or vigilance committees when they believed local government had failed. The line between justice and vengeance could be thin.

A TERRITORY TOO VAST TO POLICE When U.S. forces occupied New Mexico during the Mexican-American War in 1846, they took control of a vast and isolated region. Congress formally organized New Mexico Territory in 1850. Settlements lay hundreds of miles apart, separated by mountains, deserts and rivers and connected by wagon roads and horseback trails. Civilian law enforcement fell largely to county sheriffs and constables whose authority rarely extended beyond county lines. Communication between communities could take days. Stephen Lee became Taos

County sheriff in 1846 after Gen. Stephen W. Kearny established American civil government in New Mexico. On Jan. 19, 1847, Lee died during the Taos Revolt alongside Territorial Gov. Charles Bent and several other officials. The revolt grew from resistance to the U.S. occupation and fears over political representation, land and long-standing ways of life. A sheriff might oversee thousands of square miles with only a few deputies. If thieves crossed into another county, pursuit depended on cooperation from neighboring officials. When violence erupted, sheriffs often relied on a posse — citizens temporarily summoned to join the chase.

WHEN JUSTICE BECAME PERSONAL

THE ST. JAMES HOTEL IN CIMARRON.

By the late 19th century, ranching, mining and railroads had reshaped New Mexico’s economy and its crime. Rustlers stole cattle, trains carried payrolls and gold, land disputes turned violent, and political influence sometimes shaped who faced prosecution. Thomas “Black Jack” Ketchum illustrated the problem. His gang robbed trains across

New Mexico during the 1890s, moving between remote hideouts and territorial lines. After an 1899 train robbery near Folsom, a posse pursued gang members toward Cimarron, where Sheriff Edward Farr and another posse member were killed. Ketchum was captured later that year after another attempted robbery near Folsom. Communities that lost confidence in local government sometimes turned to vigilance committees, lynchings or summary executions. Tolby’s murder was one of the best-known examples, but hardly the only one. By the turn of the 20th century, many territorial leaders believed New Mexico had outgrown its patchwork system of sheriffs and posses.

STATEHOOD DEMANDED CHANGE The push for statehood added urgency. National newspapers often portrayed New Mexico as a lawless frontier, and territorial leaders knew effective government required proving that New Mexico could enforce its laws. In January 1905, the Santa Fe New Mexican noted that a territorial police force had first been proposed six years earlier. Texas had reorganized its Rangers and Arizona Territory had created a ranger service; the newspaper warned that criminals driven from neighboring jurisdictions were finding refuge in New Mexico. A mounted force, it argued, would protect commerce and strengthen New Mexico’s case for statehood. Cimarron’s Fred Lambert, who later served with the New Mexico Mounted Police, remembered a rash of cattle rustling in Colfax County and said local ranchers looked to the Texas and Arizona Rangers as models. The territorial legislature acted in 1905, creating the New Mexico Mounted Police, the territory’s first professional statewide law enforcement agency. Unlike county sheriffs, the Mounties could operate across jurisdictions and assist local officers wherever needed. The original force numbered just 11 men to patrol more than 120,000 square miles. Each ranger supplied his own horse, sidearm and trail equipment; the territory provided a Winchester rifle. Their small numbers underscored the scale of the job, but their statewide authority marked a fundamental change.

A YOUNG FRED LAMBERT (GREY) IN THE ST. JAMES HOTEL COURTYARD.

TRADICIONES: LEYENDAS

TA O S N E W S / S E P T. 1 7, 2 0 2 6

PORTRAIT OF FRED LAMBERT

TRADICIONES: LEYENDAS

TA O S N E W S / S E P T. 1 7, 2 0 2 6

PORTRAIT OF FRED LAMBERT AS A YOUNG MOUNTY

FROM HORSES TO HIGHWAYS

FROM HORSES TO HIGHWAYS: NEW MEXICO STATE POLICE CAPTAIN KENNETH K. MILLER_1961-1965

A BRIDGE BETWEEN TWO WORLDS If one man symbolized the transition, it was Fred “Cyclone” Lambert. Born in 1887 at Cimarron’s St. James Hotel, he grew up amid stories of Clay Allison, Black Jack Ketchum and Colfax County’s violent past. Rather than pursue outlaw fame, Lambert chose public service. In 1911, at 24, he received a territorial commission from Gov. William J. Mills and joined the Mounted Police under Capt. Fred Fornoff. Lambert later recalled that he was the youngest man appointed to the Mountie service. Looking back in 1969, Lambert resisted the mythology surrounding frontier lawmen. He urged historian Chuck Hornung to tell the Mounties’ story without “dime novel heroics,” describing it simply as a tough job that needed doing. Lambert

later helped restore Cimarron’s Aztec Mill and preserve the history he had lived.

TRADICIONES: LEYENDAS

PHOTO OF FRED LAMBERT

New Mexico became a state in 1912, but the Mounted Police did not follow a simple, uninterrupted path. Lambert recalled that the Legislature stopped funding the force in 1913; he remained on duty under commissions renewed by successive governors through 1917. A reorganized force emerged in 1918. After Pancho Villa’s 1916 raid on Columbus, mounted officers also patrolled the Mexican border. Lawmakers abolished the force in 1921, but the need for statewide policing remained. In 1933, the Legislature created the New Mexico Motor Patrol to police the growing highway system. Its first recruit class commissioned 10 officers, each issued a Harley-Davidson motorcycle. Two years later, lawmakers renamed it the New Mexico State Police and gave its officers statewide jurisdiction and full police powers.

SOURCES Brown, Cindy. “Taos Revolt and the demise of Territorial Governor Charles Bent.” Taos News, Sept. 25, 2023. Hornung, Chuck. Fullerton’s Rangers: A History of the New Mexico Territorial Mounted Police. McFarland, 2011. Foreword by Fred Lambert, 1969. Harden, Paul. “New Mexico Rangers: Story of the New Mexico Mounted Police.” El Defensor Chieftain, May 7, 2011. New Mexico State Police. “Our History: The History of the New Mex-

ico State Police.” New Mexico Department of Public Safety. “Relief From Outlaws.” Santa Fe New Mexican, Jan. 26, 1905. Santa Fe New Mexican Archives. Tollefson, Loretta Miles. “Franklin Tolby” historical essays on the Colfax County War and its aftermath. Fiction and Fact From Old New Mexico, 2017. Traverso, Sol. “Sheriff’s Office celebrates 175th anniversary.” Taos News, Oct. 27, 2021. Folsom Museum. “The Headless Horsemen of the Hi-Low: Black Jack Ketchum.” Oct. 31, 2022; credited to Kathy Weiser, Legends of America.

MORE THAN AN OLD WEST STORY New Mexico’s law-enforcement history is often remembered through famous outlaws and gunfights, but the more lasting change was institutional. Tolby’s murder showed what could happen when communities lost faith in the legal system. The Mounted Police represented an effort to replace that uncertainty with officers whose authority extended beyond county lines and came from law rather than public anger. That transformation was uneven and incomplete, but it helped move New Mexico from an era of posses and vigilantes toward professional statewide policing. The legends endured; so did the institutions built in their wake. ★

PHOTO OF FRED LAMBERT

TA O S N E W S / S E P T. 1 7, 2 0 2 6

Bridges Project for Education Community Rewards recipient

Powering meaningful change

RAICES

For over 10 years, our Community Rewards® program has enriched the places we call home. Whether supporting community services, arts, education, environment and wildlife, or healthcare, together we can do great things!

Four decades of recording the people, places and stories of Northern New Mexico

In 2025, the Nusenda Foundation granted $1 million to 108 programs. Now that’s The Power of WE®!

Look for it in the next issue.

Learn more at nusenda.org

@NusendaCU |

Insured by NCUA | Equal Opportunity Lender

Taos Community Foundation is proud to honor those who have made a commitment to our community, giving back through gifts of their time, talent, and generosity. Since 2019, we’ve recognized Wes Patterson, Mary Mortimer, Laurie Mitchell Dunn, Tad and Nancy Bourg, Yale and Shanti Jones, and Hank Friedman for their contributions towards building a community where everyone thrives. This year’s honoree will be announced at the 2026 Taos News Tradiciones celebration and on www.taoscf.org. Learn about how you can give back by scanning the QR code and signing up for our e-newsletter!

TRADICIONES: LEYENDAS

TA O S N E W S / S E P T. 1 7, 2 0 2 6

Before America

Northern New Mexico had centuries of history before the Declaration of Independence BY KATHY CORDOVA

When the late Taos High School teacher Donna Lanoff visited Colonial Williamsburg, Virginia, she responded to a tour guide who discussed the age of the courthouse by saying, “That’s nothing. We’re much older than that in New Mexico.” Lanoff was right. Long before 1776, an active society existed in Northern New Mexico. Across the region that year, Pueblo communities and Hispano settlements formed a chain of inhabited places along the upper Río Grande. Families tended corn, wheat, beans, chile, fruit and vegetables in fields watered by acequias. They cared for horses, mules, cattle, pigs and sheep. Adobe homes clustered in defensive placitas, churches anchored religious life, and residents relied on barter and trade while living with the threat of raids. This year’s 250th anniversary of U.S. independence from England has renewed interest in American colonial times. But while revolution unfolded in the East, what was happening in Northern New Mexico? U.S. history books used in secondary schools often concentrate on the East Coast colonies and the American Revolution, giving little attention to life in Northern New Mexico and the rest of the Southwest during the same period. Records at the New Mexico State Library, New Mexico State Records Center and Archives, New Mexico History Museum and Palace of the Governors document hundreds of years of life in the region. The New Mexico Humanities

Council published a 2026 essay by former state historian Rob Martinez. “Spanish language and culture, mixed with Mexican Indian, Puebloan and later arrivals such as the Navajo and Apache were already surviving and thriving in New Mexico for over a generation,” Martinez wrote. Martinez described New Mexico as a culturally distinct province on the northern edge of Spain’s empire, where language and traditions already reflected farming, ranching, hunting and life in an isolated frontier region. As Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence, Fray Francisco Atanasio Domínguez prepared a report for leaders in Mexico City on the spiritual and economic condition of New Mexico’s missions. He arrived in Santa Fe on March 22, 1776. His detailed observations provide one of the clearest windows into the region that year. Inhabitants included Pueblo peoples, Spanish colonists and genízaros — Indigenous people captured or purchased as slaves who were eventually assimilated into Spanish colonial society. According to Domínguez’s report, Taos Pueblo remained fortified with defensive towers, entrance gates and houses within the walls that could provide refuge for Pueblo residents and Spanish settlers during raids by nomadic tribes, including Comanches and Apaches. New Mexico historian Estevan Rael-Gálvez has compared the enslavement of genízaros with the system of slavery prac-

ticed by Thomas Jefferson and other colonists in the East. A 1776 sacramental record documents the baptism of a young Comanche girl who had been taken captive and renamed María Antonia. Records such as hers show the human cost of the captive culture that shaped New Mexico’s frontier communities. Rael-Gálvez wrote that churches and records described in the Domínguez report remained in disarray. “Complete entries from sacramental books had been used to stuff the windows (of the churches). Officials had removed parish books from the missions and used the pages to make cigarettes,” he wrote. Historians have noted that Domínguez viewed the remote province through the perspective of an educated, urban cleric from Mexico City. Many people assume the Homestead Act of 1862 made land ownership possible in the country, but long after the Spanish Crown abandoned the encomienda system, Spanish law in the 1700s offered land to people who occupied plots for four years. Homesteaders did not need to farm to qualify, but farmers nonetheless plowed with two oxen. Women and children also farmed, while men plowed in addition to other work. Subsistence farmers grew corn, wheat, beans, chile, fruit and vegetables for their own consumption and for barter. At harvest time, women dried fruits and vegetables, ranchers butchered sheep for meat, and families prepared chile and

other foods for winter. The smell of roasting chile would have accompanied the work of storing food for the cold months ahead. Acequias built and maintained through communal labor carried water to the fields. Settlement and cultivation, however, also led to repeated encroachment on Pueblo lands. In 1772, Gov. Pedro Fermín Mendinueta urged colonists to form communities to defend themselves because officials in Mexico City could not provide reliable protection. The communities included common land for grazing and gathering wood, while families received individual farmland. Houses connected by common walls formed defensive enclosures with limited entrances. Settlers could not sell their land for four years. L-shaped adobe houses stood close together, with 5-foot-high wooden-plank doors that opened to the outside. Few windows existed, helping keep out dust and raiders. Builders used wooden pegs and sheepskin wall finishes. Furnishings remained plain, and individuals owned only a few pieces of simple clothing without ornamentation. Faith also structured community life. Mission churches, religious processions and local fiestas remained central to Spanish settlements. Priests visited some remote communities only occasionally, and lay religious traditions, including those later associated with the Penitentes, helped keep the faith alive. Traveling vendors from Chihuahua paid New Mexicans low

prices for sheep, pine nuts, raw wool, cotton and other trade goods. Wagon trains from Chihuahua brought sugar, coffee, hardware and textiles to the colonies after journeys that could take two months. That same year, Domínguez joined Fray Silvestre Vélez de Escalante in an unsuccessful attempt to find a route from Santa Fe to California. Although they never reached Monterey, part of their route later helped shape the Old Spanish Trail. The coexistence and blending of Native citizens and descendants of Spanish colonists continue today through intermarriage, friendships and business relationships. Farmers still water crops using the centuries-old acequia system. Adobe remains a defining building material, and harvest continues to organize community life. Taos Pueblo maintains living traditions among ancient structures inhabited for centuries. Other remnants of life 250 years ago remain visible. Villages, churches and placitas preserve the imprint of the colonial period. The Martinez Hacienda Museum in Taos interprets the region’s agricultural and trading history and hosts re-enactments of old trade fairs. A children’s corner allows young visitors to try examples of period clothing. In 1776, the people of Northern New Mexico were largely unaware of the political revolution taking place nearly 2,000 miles away. Their attention centered on crops, livestock, faith, family, trade and survival. The Declaration of Independence marked the beginning of a new nation in the East, but the story of El Norte was already centuries in the making. ★

SOURCES David Weber, “The Spanish Frontier in North America”; Rob Martinez, “New Mexico 1776,” New Mexico Humanities Council; F.R. Bob Romero, “New Mexico in 1776,” Ayer y Hoy, Taos County Historical Society; Cormac Dodd, “What was New Mexico like in 1776?” Santa Fe New Mexican; and “Missions of New Mexico, 1776,” edited by Eleanor B. Adams and Fray Angelico Chavez.

LEFT: 1. ÁCOMA CHURCH INTERIOR, 1880S, AN ILLUSTRATION BY CHARLES GRAHAM. RIGHT: “CONQUEST OF NEW MEXICO”, AN ENGRAVING OF GENERAL KEARNEY PROCLAIMING NEW MEXICO PART OF THE UNITED STATES, PLAZA, LAS VEGAS, NEW MEXICO, 15 AUGUST 1846. WIKIPEDIA

TRADICIONES: LEYENDAS

TA O S N E W S / S E P T. 1 7, 2 0 2 6

TRADICIONES: LEYENDAS

TA O S N E W S / S E P T. 1 7, 2 0 2 6

A LIVING TRADITION

A PEOPLE. A PLACE. A LIVING TRADITION. For more than 1,000 years, Taos Pueblo has remained a living community—rooted in tradition, connected to the land and guided by generations of Pueblo people.

2026 Taos Pueblo Governor Michael E. Martinez Photo: Rick Romancito for the Taos News

TRADICIONES: LEYENDAS

TA O S N E W S / S E P T. 1 7, 2 0 2 6

Tradiciones: Leyendas