Integrated Constructed Wetlands David Diggens CEO Norfolk Rivers Trust
This year, we’re focusing on planning issues in regards to wetlands ❖ To provide an overview of the latest national and countylevel initiatives in planning and best practice related to spatial planning, development management and biodiversity ❖ To encourage an exchange of experience about biodiversity issues in planning amongst planners, consultees and ecological consultants in Norfolk, Suffolk, Essex and neighbouring counties Clean Water – Biodiversity – Carbon- Community
NRT’s Mission Statement Norfolk Rivers Trust’s mission is to enhance the value of the aquatic landscape through encouraging natural processes, with benefits for wildlife and people.
Background • • • • •
Formed in 2011 Trusted, independent and local Delivering change on the ground HQ - T/O £1m annual – 10 FT staff Farming advice – 5 Staff funded by WWF and Coca-Cola Freshwater Initiative • Restoration and wetlands • Education • Trading arm – Norfolk Rivers Ecology – Deliver the big projects
Charity Funding
❖ Environment Agency ❖ Natural England ❖ World Wildlife Fund ❖ Tesco, Asda, J Sainsbury, Courtauld 2025 ❖ Utility companies ❖ Lottery ❖ Private Trusts and donations ❖ Europe
Working on a catchment-scale across the region
North Norfolk North West Norfolk Broadland Cam and Ely Ouse
Restoration
Examples of silt trap interventions
Fish density impact - River Nar silt traps/and woody debris 350 300
250 200
Lexham
150
Castle Acre Manor Farm
100
50 0 2010
2013
2015
Fish numbers on Nar: EA Electro-fishing data 2015
This year, we’re focusing on planning issues in Wetlands Integrated Constructed Wetland To provide an overview of the latest national and county-level initiatives in planning and best practice related to spatial planning, development management and biodiversity. To encourage an exchange of experience about biodiversity issues in planning amongst planners, consultees and ecological consultants in Suffolk, Norfolk, Essex and neighbouring counties.
So Let’s See what we can do to make Change with Wetlands By Joining up the Dots
Integrated Constructed Wetlands (ICWs) are: Constructed systems that use natural functions such as vegetation, soil and organisms to treat wastewater
Two Wetlands: One Outcome Water Quality in Norfolk’s Chalk Rivers Improved 1) • • • •
River Mun, Northrepps Wetland (Pilot Scheme) 2014 Private agreement with landowner Catering for 800 inhabitants Phosphate focus Proved the science which led to Anglian Water Ingol project
2) River Ingol AWG Sponsored May 2018 • Larger ambitions - 6000 inhabitants • Ammonia focus • Great opportunity to compare and contrast • Research – microplastics and other water-vectored substances • SIP 3 Special Investigations • Potential for NATIONAL IMPACT
• 0.4 ha site • Site size is dictated by population size • Population at Mun STW 850 (population equivalent) i.e. 850 bottoms • Targeting phosphate (P)
• • • •
NORTHREPPS
Money From Catchment Restoration Fund (CRF) Private landowner – Wished to share in the Pilot No landowner payment Taking treated sewerage – piped to site
Northrepps Wetland River Mun ▪ Fantastic community buy-in with 60+ local volunteers involved in creation ▪ Increases Biodiversity ▪ Creates opportunity for Net Gain ▪ On-site wildlife watching hide set up for locals ▪ Sightings include kingfishers, barn owl, otters, water vole.
The River Ingol before the creation of the ICW
The Ingol Project Small Chalk River STW 50% River Flow ❖ Collaboration ❖ Teamwork ❖ Natural Solutions
Ingol footprint • Population 6000 PE – 6000 people, 2000 washing machines
• Total area of land required 2.2ha – Wetland area 1.3ha – Calculated on flow concentration of pollutants
INGOL CONSTRUCTION PHOTOS
Add new before during and after
INGOL Community Benefits ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪
Local Primary School Local No Objections Planting Volunteers Positive Local Impression Opportunities - Bird watching - Community-based monitoring - Fishing - Additional cells - Long-term - Natural
INGOL Rapid ecological changes Rapid change in insects, birds and bats. Dragon and damsel flies Honey and Bumble bees Red Shank to Red Kite
All known Norfolk bats WATER VOLES arrived All recorded in under a year
Ecosystem services assessment of the Ingol ICW
ICWs provide the opportunity to create enhanced stocks of natural capital and to increase the flows of ecosystem services from those stocks Based on an assessment approach described in: McInnes, R.J. & Everard, M. (2017) Rapid Assessment of Wetland Ecosystem Services (RAWES): An example from Colombo, Sri Lanka. Ecosystem Services. 25, 89-105 and Ramsar Convention (2018) Resolution XIII.17 Rapidly assessing wetland ecosystem services.
Northrepps Performance Frogshall Wetland - Phosphate Phosphate Concentration (mg P/L)
12.000
10.000
April 4th
May 10th
June 16th
8.000
6.000
4.000
2.000
0.000
River Upstream
Cell 1 top
Cell 1 bottom
Cell 2 top
Cell 2 bottom
Cell 3 top
Cell 3 bottom
River Downstream
BIRD SPECIES @ NORTHREPPS
Ingol Performance Ingoldisthorpe Wetland - Phosphate 4.000
3.500
Phosphate (mg P/L)
3.000
2.500
2.000
1.500
1.000
0.500
0.000 River Upstream
Cell 1 top
Cell 1 bottom
Cell 2 top
March 20th
Cell 2 bottom
May 9th
Cell 3 top
May 24th
Cell 3 bottom
June 10th
Cell 4 top
Cell 4 bottom
River Downstream
Integrated Constructed Wetlands Adaptable – Any size – Any where Forest and ponds intercepting land drainage
Flood attenuation and treatment
Industrial (food processing) wastewater treatment
Water management through the coherent reanimation of ‘integrated’ constructed wetland types
In situ treatment of landfill leachate
Municipal wastewater treatment
Recreational self cleansing swimming pond
ICW Dunhill example
• Combined municipal wastewater • Road drainage water
A river window design feature
Wetland Applications Designs
Urban Integrated Bristol Landscape Proposal
Water Framework Drivers Environment Agency
➢ ICWs are ideal for smaller and rural Water Recycling Centres ➢ No deterioration ➢ Technically feasible ➢ Cost beneficial ➢ Biodiversity improvements ➢ Partnership delivery - Everyone is a winner… - Including the natural world - Don’t forget carbon!
Integrated Constructed Wetlands Adaptable – Any size – Any where Forest and ponds intercepting land drainage
Flood attenuation and treatment
Industrial (food processing) wastewater treatment
Water management through the coherent reanimation of ‘integrated’ constructed wetland types
In situ treatment of landfill leachate
Municipal wastewater treatment
Recreational self cleansing swimming pond
This year, we’re focusing on planning issues in regards to wetlands ❖ To provide an overview of the latest national and countylevel initiatives in planning and best practice related to spatial planning, development management and biodiversity ❖ To encourage an exchange of experience about biodiversity issues in planning amongst planners, consultees and ecological consultants in Norfolk, Suffolk, Essex and neighbouring counties So, let’s see what we can do to make change with wetlands by… Joining up the dots!
Catchment Based Approach Integrated Constructed Wetland Working Group • • • • • • •
Chaired By The Rivers Trust Central EA- Environmental Permitting Nat England – Land Use UK Utilities ICW Specialists UKWIR Research UK University Research
Aims and Objectives The primary aim of the group is to understand, agree and address the key barriers to enabling the use of wetlands as nutrient control mechanisms for meeting existing and emerging water quality and environmental protection obligations. A secondary aim is to understand the design and operational parameters that enable the achievement of additional natural capital and social benefits (meeting the goals of the 25 Year Environment Plan). This needs to be achieved in a way that attracts funding and financing solutions for optimising wider catchment aims, whilst achieving primary aims. The group will share learning from real world scenarios to understand and resolve key barriers to the wider adoption of Integrated Constructed Wetlands. The objective being to increase the adoption of treatment wetlands through future AMP cycles.
The group will promote collaborative and integrated working to achieve the above aims to improve the environment as a valuable resource for business, people and wildlife.
PLANNING POLICY Our Experience • • • •
Inconsistency of Authorities Unpredictable Differing Rules One National Standard for Integrated Constructed Wetlands – National Working Group
• Simple and Easy to follow – National Guidance
PLANNING POLICY Our Observations • Recognition of Biodiversity • Planning authority assumption of NEGATIVE Outcomes with Water • Integrated Constructed Wetlands POSITIVE outcome • • • • •
Ingol Example The benefits The Community Overall Wellbeing And above all Water Quality
PLANNING POLICY Our Interpretation • • • •
10% Solar 10 % Biodiversity WATER SAVING / Use / Storage / Green infrastructure
• Management Challenges • Roll Of The NGO
• Rewilding / Nature/ Biodiversity / Ecology • Cost of maintenance / management
Planning Policy Hereford Example Applicable to East Anglia • • • • • •
Dutch Nitrates Ruling Special Areas Conservation Knowingly Damage No Deterioration County Infrastructure levy Up to £400.00 per house to pay for Integrated Constructed Wetland • Delivered by Wye and Usk Foundation ( Rivers Trust)
I have a dream
Housing Planning for Water
• Energy Performance Certificates • Water Performance Certificates • Water Smart readers – in homes
From the outside Looking in • Can we make it less complicated – Less time consuming – Who Benefits from all the delay?
• Do we plan biodiversity into every development ? – Its about the long term
• • • •
CREATE CHANGE for: Water Soil – Well Being -
In conclusion - Simple actions ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Plan to manage water resources at every level Plan wetlands into developments Create new wetlands Plan the natural world into every decision ✓ Environmental GREEN Infrastructure Create the Change Maintain living ponds Let the hedges grow with the community Let the verges sing to the sound of life – Simple
Ramsar wetlands