Skip to main content

Answer to Sixth Amended Complaint

Page 1

The Honorable Jim Rogers

1 2 3 4 5 6

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY

7 8

PATRICK WILLS, et al., No. 19-2-31648-9 SEA Plaintiffs,

9 10 11

ANSWER TO SIXTH AMENDED COMPLAINT

v. SEATTLE CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL, a nonprofit Washington Corporation,

12

Defendant.

13 14 15

Defendant Seattle Children’s Hospital answers Plaintiffs’ Sixth Amended Complaint (the “Complaint”) as follows:

16

1.1

17

Complaint.

18

1.2

19

Complaint.

20

1.3

21

Complaint.

22

1.4

23

Seattle Children’s Hospital admits the allegations in paragraph 1.1 of the

Seattle Children’s Hospital denies the allegations in paragraph 1.2 of the

Seattle Children’s Hospital denies the allegations in paragraph 1.3 of the

Seattle Children’s Hospital admits that in 2008 the Patnode family and Seattle

Children’s Hospital agreed to terms to settle the lawsuit brought by the Patnode family. Except

24 ANSWER TO SIXTH AM. COMPL. - 1 4868-4212-5360v.4 0017722-000496

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP L AW O FFICE S 920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98104-1610 206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Answer to Sixth Amended Complaint by Stritmatter Law - Issuu