Skip to main content

Juvenile Detention SA - Complaint - Benton-Franklin

Page 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

9 10 11 12

R.B., and O.M.

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

v. BENTON COUNTY, a municipal entity, and FRANKLIN COUNTY, an municipal entity; Defendant.

13 14

NO.

Plaintiffs,

Plaintiffs allege: I.

15

INTRODUCTION

16

For decades, Washington State law has recognized a fundamental duty: when the

17

government takes a child from the community and places that child behind a locked door, it

18

assumes responsibility for that child's safety. To meet this duty, it should go without saying that

19

every youth detainee must be free of sexual abuse. The child cannot leave and cannot seek

20

protection from anyone other than the institution that holds them captive. This is precisely why

21

Washington has always required that counties staff their detention facilities with persons of good

22

character. It is why the Juvenile Justice Act of 1977 required annual inspections, formal

23

operational standards, and accountability.

24 Complaint - 1

t received by the WA Benton County Superior Court.

8

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR BENTON COUNTY

STRITMATTER LAW FIRM 3600 15th Ave W, Ste. 300 Seattle, WA 98119 Tel: 206.448.1777


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Juvenile Detention SA - Complaint - Benton-Franklin by Stritmatter Law - Issuu