S TA R - K
KO S H E R C E R T I F I C AT I O N
ד ב אלטי מ א ר
הכ ש ר ו ת
ועד
Kashrus Kurrents VOLUME 39
N O. 2
Summer 5777–2017
In Whom Do We Trust?
Examining Conflicts of Interest in Food Certification RABBI MOSHE SCHUCHMAN K A S H R U S A D M I N I S T R AT O R The Fundamental Question Should someone be stigmatized because he has a conflict of interest? Apparently, the mainstream media feels this way and ethics review boards often highlight this as a red flag. People are not the only ones who are challenged by this issue. Organizations whose trust and authority hinge on an image of integrity must deal with perceived conflicts of interest, both on the corporate level and with regard to individual employees. Food certification agencies, whether they oversee kosher, organic, non-GMO, gluten-free or a host of other popular standards1 must all face the inevitable question: How do they ensure that compliance judgements are based on whether the client is meeting its regulatory requirements, without regard to financial considerations? Government bodies, such as USDA, FDA and health departments largely avoid this question – on the corporate level - because they are funded independently of the businesses they certify.2 Individual inspectors are screened to keep them from evaluating businesses with whom they have an outside relationship. However, governments are neither equipped nor qualified to service niche certification markets. Therefore, the job of certification falls to private sector organizations which must charge fees to remain viable. Given this arrangement, when choosing a certification to rely upon, consumers may wonder how compliance monitors maintain impartiality. How are they shielded from the monetary link between the certifier and certified company? Deal-Breaker? Not Necessarily
EATING CHOCOLATE WITH A C L E A R “ C O N C H ”- E N C E
RABBI TZVI ROSEN EDITOR, KASHRUS KURRENT S
Chocolate, the king of confections, continues to grow in popularity. Chocolate is surely nature’s sweetest combination of fruit and vegetable, sugar and cocoa beans. Kosher chocolate is a delicious study of technology and halachah. Let’s explore the intoxicating world of chocolate. Over the years, chocolate manufacturing has continued to grow, both domestically and internationally. Chocolate connoisseurship has reached new heights. Believe it or not, the most expensive chocolate today costs in excess of $90 a pound. The chocoholic delights at the sight of Belgian truffles, French bonbons, Swiss chocolate and other chocolate bars that abound. Most major chocolate manufacturers in the U.S. have reliable kosher certification. Some specialty chocolate manufacturers are kosher certified, as well. Cholov Yisroel chocolate in particular has recently seen unprecedented growth. Today, a Cholov Yisroel consumer can feast on a Cholov Yisroel chocolate equivalent without having to compromise on taste or quality. Chocolate raw ingredients make a long trek before being transformed into a familiar chocolate bar or chocolate covered cherry. The prime ingredient in chocolate is the cacao bean, which grows in many regions of the world including Africa, Central America, and Southeast Asia. Two main varieties of trees produce cacao beans: the Forastero tree in West Africa which produces commodity quality cacao beans, and the Criollo tree which is found in Venezuela and other South American countries and produces premium quality cacao beans. The first stage of cacao bean processing is harvesting, which may be done by machete – a slow and tedious process – or by automatic shakers that release the cacao pods. Next, the pods are cracked open and the cacao beans are removed. Note that cacao beans, when processed for commercial use, will become cocoa beans. Cocoa beans, which are covered with a sweet white pulp or mucilage, are then fermented and dried. Once dried, the cocoa beans are packed in jute sacks and shipped overseas to the chocolate manufacturers for further processing.
If one adopts a perspective that all conflicts of interest are scandalous, then ultimately this question may remain an unresolved ethical conundrum. Yet, if one is open to a discussion on how certifying agencies can design and maintain systems to protect the integrity of the certification process, the result will lead to increased consumer confidence, lingering imperfections notwithstanding.
The cocoa bean is one of Hashem’s most fascinating creations. In order for its potential to be fully unlocked, it requires processing to convert the quality products contained within. The raw cocoa beans are cleaned and roasted in giant roasters, much like a coffee bean, to unlock the nib’s delicious cocoa flavors. The cocoa bean is then ground into a paste known as cocoa liquor, the primary ingredient of chocolate.
Contrary to assertions commonly espoused by skeptics and opponents, the existence of a conflict of interest is not necessarily a deal-breaker. In most cases, once the conflict is revealed the situation can be remedied by increasing transparency in other areas. A conflict of interest becomes an absolute disqualification only when public trust completely erodes.
Sometimes cocoa butter is listed as an ingredient. What is cocoa butter? The cocoa bean has over 50% natural fat. When squeezed under enormous pressure
A present example where conflicts of interest are tolerated, at least officially, is in the newly famous Title 18 Section 208 of C O N T I N U E D O N PA G E 2 1. Including: food safety, fair trade, and ethical sourcing. 2. Although, government agencies encounter a different set of conflicts stemming from special interest groups, political expediencies, and bureaucratic roadblocks.
Leadership in
Inside this issue
C O N T I N U E D O N PA G E 3
A Circle of Trust: Certifier, Company, Consumer..................................Page 1 Eating Chocolate with a Clear "CONCH"-ENCE.....................................Page 1 Insights from the Institute...........................................................................Page 5 New Under STAR-K.........................................................................................Page 7 STAR-K Summer Program.............................................................................Page 8
Kashrus Education
RABBI MOSHE SCHUCHMAN K A S H R U S A D M I N I S T R AT O R C O N T I N U E D F R O M PA G E 1
the United States Code. This exempts the President and Vice-President from the restrictions imposed on government officials whose financial holdings can profit due to their position in public office. Apparently, the law assumes that if the electorate chose them to lead the executive branch they are considered sufficiently trustworthy to make decisions for the benefit of the nation and not their own pockets. (The Jewish stance is leiv m’lachim b’yad HaShem!)
significant responsibility and risk. After establishing a person’s innate trustworthiness,4 Rambam proceeds to describe how if a butcher is found to be a charlatan a steep penalty is levied for even a first-time offense. The proprietor loses all kosher credibility and is forced to close his business. To restore his previous reputation, remorse and penance are not enough. He must move to a different location and exhibit unsolicited displays of honesty before regaining his former status.5
In halachah, a conflict of interest is also not necessarily taboo. Rambam (Ma’achalos Asurus 8:7) rules that a butcher, without any oversight, is believed when he says he removed forbidden fats (cheilev) and the sciatic nerve (gid hanasheh) from meat that is sold by weight, even though doing so reduces his profits. Nevertheless, this trust is not automatic. The halachah includes a provision that the butcher must be a “person of upstanding moral character and muchzak b’kashrus – possessing an impeccable reputation in matters of kosher food production.”3 Elsewhere (Shechitah 10:14), Rambam writes that an established butcher of good repute, proficient in the laws of kosher meat production, can be trusted even when his primary source of livelihood comes from selling kosher meat. We don’t assume that financial gain will sway his kashrus determinations. In fact, some butcher shops in bygone communities in Europe and America were self-certified and did not carry outside supervision.
An advantage of retaining the services of a certification agency is that in the event a mistake is made, instead of being forced to leave town as the Rambam prescribes, the certifier can investigate the matter. If it’s determined that the proprietor acted in good faith, they can help formulate a plan to restore consumer trust. Another benefit to obtaining kosher certification is that even a business that is not staffed by people with kosher qualifications becomes eligible to produce kosher certified foods, provided it meets the certification requirements.
In his Pirush HaMishnayos (Bechoros 4:5), Rambam appears to take an opposing stance. He censures communities where the shochtim and bodkim (those who check for defects that would render the animal a t’reifah) are paid only when their work results in kosher meat, but not when the meat is deemed non-kosher. Even when the individual is known to be righteous, we are concerned that the opportunity to make money may sway him to improperly designate meat as kosher. Halachah mandates avoiding ch’shad, engaging in activity that onlookers may misconstrue as dishonest.
In recent years, the secular world has joined the kosher bandwagon with a proliferation of other forms of outside food certification, comprising a multi-billion-dollar industry. Sales depend on good distribution abilities, and major food distributors and supermarket chains now carry only products from manufacturers with independently audited food safety and quality credentials.
Accordingly, Shulchan Aruch (Yoreh Dei’ah 18:18) rules that shochtim be paid for their services regardless of the results. Apparently, one is not trusted to make a proper judgement when his livelihood is at stake. Eventually, this led to the widespread practice of appointing fixed wage community shochtim who function separately from the butchers. Nevertheless, later Poskim acknowledge a few instances in meat processing where the conflict of interest was never fully resolved and the food was still accepted as kosher. The Rambam’s viewpoint is reconcilable. Aruch HaShulchan (18:43) writes that fundamentally (mei’ikar hadin) a knowledgeable, upstanding person is considered trustworthy and, unless otherwise demonstrated, the presumption is that he will not attempt to present nonkosher food as kosher for the sake of financial gain. Even so, communities throughout the centuries have enacted reasonable precautions to safeguard against the temptation of fraud. Many of these enactments were subsequently enshrined in halachah. Certified Advantage Ex p lo i ti ng halachic confidence to operate without outside certification comes with
Even when there is no wrongdoing, a trust-based model doesn’t work in communities with large populations where the people don’t know each other very well on a personal level. Especially in today’s business climate, where products must reach a broad market in order to be profitable, it is impossible for customers to verify the good reputation and competency of every food provider. Therefore, credible kosher certification plays a critical role in the food industry.
I’ll Eat In Your House, Not In Your Store Kosher certification fills a need for small-scale cottage industry businesses, as well. Many consumers innately recognize that commercially produced food should be certified, even when produced by friends or acquaintances, as the following anecdote illustrates: A wealthy Eastern European Jewish businessman regularly visited his rebbeh, always bringing a gift of goose fat that he personally rendered. Years passed, the businessman’s fortunes declined, and he was left without a source of income. He approached his rebbeh for advice, who counseled him to transform his hobby of rendering goose fat into a commercial operation. Soon enough, the fellow was back on his feet with a new thriving business. During his next trip to the rebbeh, with a generous amount of goose fat in hand, he was astounded when instead of graciously accepting the gift the rebbeh asked him if his product had a hashgochah. For so many years the rebbeh accepted the gift based on personal trust alone! What had changed? The rebbeh gently explained to his chossid that the difference was quite simple. When rendering goose fat was merely a personal activity, his ne’amanus (halachic trustworthiness) was sufficient. However, now that it became a for-profit endeavor it needed a hechsher! A request for certification is not a disparagement of one’s honesty. Au contraire, certification is offered only to businesses whose management is appraised as honest! The truism “locks are on doors to keep honest people honest” can be adapted to “food producers are certified to keep kosher food kosher.”6 Dealing with the Question Once the necessity for the institution of a kosher certification agency has been established, let’s return to our original question: What C O N T I N U E D O N PA G E 4
3. אין לוקחין בשר מכל טבח אלא אם היה אדם כשר ומוחזק בכשרות 4. חזקת כשרות 5. ואם יצאת טריפה מתחת ידו מנדין אותו ומעבירין אותו ואינו חוזר לכשרותו עד שילך למקום שאין מכירים אותו ויחזיר אבידה בדבר חשוב או יוציא טריפה לעצמו בדבר חשוב:לשון הרמב”ם 6. The experience of kosher certification agencies is that certification works only for businesses with a culture of rectitude. Once it’s demonstrated that the system has been compromised with malicious intent, no amount of oversight is effective.
2
Leadership in
Kashrus Education
RABBI TZVI ROSEN EDITOR, KASHRUS KURRENT S C O N T I N U E D F R O M PA G E 1
in a hydraulic press, the cocoa bean exudes fat that is yellow in color, similar to rich dairy butter; hence, the name cocoa butter. Unlike dairy butter, however, cocoa butter is thicker, blander, and hardens at room temperature. What remains behind in this extraction process is a massive solid cake which, when ground, will be known as – you guessed it – cocoa powder. Ironically, for the chocolate manufacturer the main commodity product is the cocoa butter and the by-product is the cocoa powder. Cocoa liquor that is produced from premium cocoa beans is rich enough to form chocolate. Cocoa liquor made from standard cocoa beans lacks richness and, therefore, cannot be made into chocolate without the addition of cocoa butter. THE CHOCOLATE-MAKING PROCESS Sugar, chocolate liquor, cocoa butter, milk powder, flavors and lecithin as an emulsifier are the primary ingredients of chocolate. When these products are blended together, as we will soon see, they meld to form liquid chocolate. Interestingly, liquid chocolate is over 50% sugar. The percentages of the other ingredients vary according to the type of chocolate being manufactured. There are three major types of liquid chocolate: dark chocolate, milk chocolate, and white chocolate. Dark chocolate is a combination of cocoa liquor, cocoa butter, sugar and flavorings such as vanilla or vanillin. Sometimes a dairy ingredient, such as traced butter oil (not to be confused with cocoa butter) is added as a flavor ingredient. Milk chocolate contains powdered milk and milk crumb, a combination of milk powder and sugar that is added to the “dark chocolate” mix. White chocolate is not a conventional chocolate as it contains no cocoa liquor or cocoa powder, only cocoa butter. White chocolate is also known as a compound chocolate because additional vegetable fats are added to the ingredient base. All varieties of chocolate undergo three basic steps of chocolate production: a) kneading the ingredients into a paste, b) grinding the paste into semi-granular particles, and c) blending the ingredients in a conch. Solid chocolate requires tempering as a final step to finish the product. THE QUALITY IN THE CONCHING What is Conching? As any good cook or baker will tell you, there are certain tricks of the trade that set a “great” product apart from a ”good” or “ho-hum” product. The trick of the chocolate trade is quality ingredients blended in a blending machine called a conch. The chocolate blending process is known as conching. The conch is a large rotary blender that blends the chocolaty mass for hours on end at a temperature of approximately 140°F. The chocolate may be conched for over 12 hours in order to fully homogenize the ingredients. Lecithin, an emulsifier, is added to help blend the ingredients. Conching releases any bitter aromas and flavors in the liquified chocolate and allows all the remaining delicious chocolate flavors and aromas to mature fully and develop into a symphony of chocolaty taste. If the chocolate is being sold as liquid chocolate, no further processing is required. Industrial chocolate is shipped to the manufacturing customers in a heated transport, in which a constant temperature of 112°F is maintained to prevent solidification or hardening. Customers are typically bakeries, ice cream manufacturers or candymakers who will further process the chocolate.
Solid chocolate must be tempered after conching in order to give it its luster. In the tempering process, the chocolate is heated to 113°F, quickly cooled and slightly heated to 90°F. The tempered chocolate is then ready to be molded into any variety of forms: large 50 pound cubes, 25-pound bars, or consumer sized chocolate drops. With this overview, let us examine the issues that confront kosher chocolate making. Ingredients As with any manufactured food product, all ingredients require strict kosher certification. Mashgichim travel to cocoa bean plantations around the world. All the additional ingredients require reliable kosher certification. Interestingly, ingredients used in European chocolate processing may present many more challenges than in domestic chocolate production. In Europe today, genetically modified raw materials are strictly avoided. One example of a genetically modified grain is the soybean, used to produce lecithin and emulsify and blend the ingredients being conched. Nearly all soybean crops worldwide have been genetically modified. Consequently, lecithin has come under scrutiny in Europe and European chocolate producers have looked to find suitable alternatives to lecithin. The newest trend alternative in Europe is sunflower lecithin. Alternatives to lecithin were researched, and a seemingly innocuous product called ammonium phosphatide is used as a lecithin alternative. This product itself poses no kashrus problems. One company in Denmark that manufactures ammonium phosphatide was a totally nonkosher facility, thereby requiring massive kosherization. Due to the demand, kosher ammonium phosphatide is available. Reliable kosher traced butter o i l requires strict kosher supervision. It goes without saying that the vegetable fats used to manufacture kosher compound chocolate must have reliable kosher certification, because these vegetable fats can be produced in the same facilities as tallow or lard. In Search Of A Pareve Conch What is the greatest nemesis to chocolate? Water – just ask any balabusta who uses melted chocolate in homemade recipes. When mixed with chocolate, even minimally, water causes the chocolate to solidify almost instantaneously into a solid block that can’t be remelted! Consequently, chocolate manufacturers passionately avoid the introduction of water into their facilities at all costs. Recognizing this problem, how do kosher chocolate manufacturers overcome the issue of compatible conches that may be used indiscriminately for pareve and dairy chocolates without using water? One possibility is to dedicate conches exclusively for dairy and pareve productions. This method is used in certain chocolate production facilities because sufficient amounts of both pareve and dairy products are manufactured to justify the separation. Most kosher chocolate companies felt that segregating conches is expensive and impractical. This problem has plagued kosher chocolate manufacturers for many years. Their solution was that in lieu of water, the conches would be kashered by sha’ar mashkim, using liquid dark chocolate.1 The Shulchan Aruch poses the question regarding whether liquids other than water may be used for kosherization. The Remah is opposed to using sha’ar C O N T I N U E D O N PA G E 6
1. The “kashering dark chocolate” serves as a substitute for kashering water and is known in halachic terms as sha’ar mashkim.
Leadership in
Kashrus Education
3
C O N T I N U E D F R O M PA G E 2
measures can be implemented that will eliminate, or at least minimize, the inherent conflict of interest? Even if there is no halachic dilemma posed by a conflict of interest, and even if organizations were staffed exclusively with professionals possessing impeccable moral character, the Torah imperative of “v’hyisim n’ki’im” (Parshas Matos 32:22) enjoins us to bolster public perception and pre-empt suspicions of impropriety. The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 21 establishes the operating rules for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Subpart M deals with, “Accreditation Of Third-Party Certification Bodies To Conduct Food Safety Audits And To Issue Certifications.” Section 1.657 is entitled, “How must an accredited third-party certification body protect against conflicts of interest?”7 These regulations primarily address safeguarding against individuals associated with the certifying agency from having any financial ties to the certified entity. They also set parameters of legitimate payment for services and disallow anybody working for the certifier from accepting anything that can be construed as a bribe.8 In the kosher certification sphere, the federal guidelines should be just a starting point for the agency’s organizational structure. Since kosher is, at its essence, a spiritual matter with ramifications on one’s soul and eternal relationship with the Creator, the expectations should be much higher. In a democratic and capitalistic society, each organization is obviously free to determine their own guidelines in this realm. Moreover, just because a certifier implements tight protocols to guard from conflicts of interest, their actual kashrus standards could be quite lacking. Conversely, a certification may well deserve their excellent reputation despite a perception of having conflicts of interest. With that disclaimer in mind, what follows are some observations that this author has noticed during his tenure as a kashrus administrator concerning how a kosher certifier can effectively counteract the perceived challenge: Leadership – The leaders who form the backbone of the organization and set the tone in the workplace are known to be beyond reproach, setting a strong example in both their personal and professional lives. In the words of Yisro (18:21), “. . . sonay votzah.” (See Rashi, Devarim 1:15) Separation of Divisions – The agency’s regulatory department must have independent authority, with autonomy to evaluate the merit of a certification based on compliance with the kosher system, without regard for financial repercussions.
Anonymous Presentations – When questions arise regarding a company’s policy compliance, the core issues can be presented for adjudication by the certifier’s poseik (or poskim) without regard to the company’s identity, unless that is also a factor in the specific halachic decision. Gift Acceptance – Kashrus professionals often work long and sometimes erratic hours on behalf of the companies they service, and their efforts are usually appreciated. A firm policy regarding acceptance of gifts must be in place. Fee Structure – While we certainly take tremendous pride when our certified companies are successful, certification fees are a function of the resources required to administer the certification and maintain kashrus standards, not the company’s profitability. Transparency – The certifier readily discloses its standards. Conformance - While there is ample room for individual variances between hashgachos to meet a spectrum of consumer communities, the certifier adheres to a baseline standard in all circumstances.9 Disclosure - CFR Title 21 sec 1.657 part (d) requires that thirdparty certification bodies must maintain an up-to-date list on their website of all “the eligible entities to which it has issued food or facility certifications.” Similarly, reputable kashrus organizations disclose the identity of all companies enrolled in their certification program for public examination. Non-Profit Status – A “for-profit” organization can operate with the same level of integrity and ethics as a “non-profit.” However, a “nonprofit” is subject to additional oversight and external scrutiny that may contribute positively in preventing malfeasance. Whether one is a lone rabbi in a small town who bears the responsibility of providing his community with kosher offerings, or part of a global organization overseeing networks of professionals stretching across continents, the method to resolve conflicts of interest is the same. Protecting the integrity of kosher certification is paramount, to the degree that financial issues do not even qualify as an “interest”.10 In the absence of competing interests, there is no conflict. A certifier who consistently functions with these principles will earn the trust and respect of both consumers and companies alike.
Checks and Balances - All certification approvals or denials are reviewed by multiple parties. Also, there is a peer review system to continually monitor that policies are followed. Numerical Strength – A large organization is adequately funded so that its operations and staffing remain unhampered, even if major accounts are discontinued. Its solvency does not depend on retaining any client. Incentive-less – Although incentive models are a terrific way to motivate employees and make them feel appreciated for their hard work, no certification administrator should be rewarded for securing any client. There are also no consequences if a company is released for failing to comply with certification standards.
7. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfCFR/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=1.657 8. The one allowance mentioned is: “Lunch of de minimis value provided during the course of an audit and on the premises where the audit is conducted, if necessary to facilitate the efficient conduct of the audit.” 9. Membership in AKO (Association of Kashrus Organizations) requires a commitment to abide by a certain threshold of halachic application and administration expertise. Within AKO, a range of standards exists and there is no expectation of reciprocity. Additionally, member organizations may not use their admittance for promotional means. 10. See Remah, Yoreh Deiah 157:1 and commentaries regarding the obligation to absorb monetary loss instead of transgressing issurim. Causing others to eat non-kosher food involves numerous issurim.
4
Leadership in
Kashrus Education
INSIGHTS the from
Q: A:
INSTITUTE
SHAILOS FROM THE INSTITUTE OF HALACHA
RABBI MORDECHAI FRANKEL DIREC TOR, THE INSTITUTE OF HAL ACHAH
When Challah Separation Goes A-Rye
I made some dough in order to bake bread and separated challah. When I wasn’t looking, someone inadvertently took that piece of separated challah and added it back into the rest of the dough. Now that the dough and challah are all mixed together, how should I proceed?
Before we discuss how to proceed, let us clarify one point. The word “challah” has two meanings. It is used as the name of a bread which is braided, baked and commonly eaten at Shabbos meals. It is also used to describe a small piece of dough that was separated from a larger batch of dough in order to fulfill the halachic obligation of hafrashas challah. We are using the word “challah” in that second sense. Let us discuss the case where challah was mixed with dough and can no longer be recognized. If the batch of dough that the challah fell into had a volume which was 100 times as much as the volume of the challah that fell in (or more), the challah is botul and the whole mixture may be eaten. Even though the shiur of bitul is generally 1 part in 60, for challah the shiur of bitul is 1 part in 100.1 Rav Yaakov Emden writes that this halachah of bitul applies only when the challah is mixed into a different dough, not when it is mixed back into the very same dough from which the challah was separated. In our scenario, where the challah was added back into the same dough from which it came, Rav Yaakov Emden paskens that bitul will not help. However, the majority of Poskim disagree with this and say that in this case the challah would be botul.2 Generally, there is not 100 times as much dough as there is challah and we cannot rely on bitul. The question, therefore, remains how should one proceed in that case? There is a halachah that a person who makes a neder (vow) may nullify his neder through a process known as hataras nedarim. A verbal declaration that a piece of dough should be challah is halachically akin to a neder in that hataras nedarim nullifies the declaration. Therefore, in our scenario where the challah was mixed into the dough, the person who separated the challah should perform hataras nedarim and then separate challah again.3
The person who separated challah should perform hataras nedarim in front of a beis din of three men who are all over the age of bar mitzvah. (In Eretz Yisroel, where the obligation to separate challah is from the Torah, the members of the beis din should be adults or older teenagers. The beis din may include men who are either related to each other or to the person performing hataras netarim. However, a husband cannot be part of a beis din for his wife’s hataras nedarim. The three people do not need to be talmidei chachamim, but they do need to understand the basic concepts of hataras nedarim. The person performing hataras nedarim should stand and the beis din should sit. The person should say that he/ she regrets having designated the dough as challah, and that had he/she known that it was going to be remixed into the dough it would not have been designated as challah. The beis din should respond that the neder is annulled, which is customarily done by stating, “Muttar lach, muttar lach, muttar lach”. Hataras nedarim may be performed either during the day or night. (Hataras nedarim may be performed on Shabbos if it is being done le’tzorech Shabbos or le’tzorech mitzvah).4 Generally, the person who separated the challah must personally appear before beis din and cannot send a shaliach on his/her behalf. For example, a father cannot appear before beis din on his daughter’s behalf. However, a woman may send her husband as a shaliach to perform hataras nedarim on her behalf. He should not gather three men specifically for this purpose, but instead should find three men who are already together (e.g., in shul after davening).5 After performing hataras nedarim, challah should be separated again. If there is sufficient dough to require a brachah, the challah should be separated with a brachah. Even though a brachah was already recited over the first challah, since that hafrashas challah was nullified a second brachah must be recited over the new hafrashas challah. Even though this results in the same brachah being recited twice, the person is not considered to have uttered an unnecessary brachah levatalah.6 For further information regarding hafrashas challah, see “When You Need to Knead: A Guide to Hafrashas Challah” by Rabbi Dovid Heber at https://www.star-k.org/articles/articles/1197/when-you-need-toknead-a-guide-to-hafrashas-challah/.
ואף שהט’ז בסוה”ס שם פסק שבדיעבד מהני ביטול ברוב מ”מ, אבל הרמ”א שם כתב שאוסרת עד מאה ואחד אם נתערבה במינה, השו”ע יו”ד סי’ שכג סעי’ א פסק שחלת חו”ל בטלה בחולין שוה בשוה.1 , ויש לו עוד חתיכה קטנה של חלה, אדם שחילק עיסתו לכמה חתיכות קטנות, ומו”ר ר’ משה היינעמאן שליט”א אמר שאף לדעת הרמ”א.הש”ך שם ס”ק ג הסכים לדברי הרמ”א דבעינן ביטול במאה ואחד . בטל החלה ברוב כדמבואר בשו”ע יו”ד סי’ קט סעי’ א,ונתערב חתיכה זו באחרות ואינו מכיר איזו חתיכה הוא של חלה אמנם בערוך השלחן שם סעי’ יג ובשו”ת טוב טעם ודעת תליתאי ח”ב סי’ קעט ובשו”ת מהרש”ם ח”ז סי’ לח (ד”ה ובגוף) ובשו”ת, כ”כ בשו”ת יעב”ץ ח”א סי’ קלה וח”ב סי’ צט הובא בפת”ש שם ס”ק ב.2 . חלקת יעקב יו”ד סי’ קפ בשולי העמוד הרבו להקשות ולתמוה על דבריו וכ”כ, אבל הש”ך בנקודות הכסף דחה את דבריו והעלה כדברי הרמ”א, והט”ז שם ס”ק ב פסק דלא מהני התרה בכה”ג שאינו מתחרט אלא משום שהחלה נתערבה בעיסה, רמ”א שם בשם תשובות מיימוני.3 . וכ”כ בשו”ת בית יעקב סי’ קי (הבוא בפת”ש שם ס”ק ג) ושו”ת חות יאיר סי’ קל ושו”ת שאילת יעבץ ח”ב סי’ צח ושו”ת חת”ס אהע”ז ח”ב סו”ס צב,הברכי יוסף שם ס”ק א והערוך השלחן שם סעי’ יד וגם יודעים לפתוח לו,) דהיינו שמבינים מה שלומדים עמהם (ט”ז שם ס”ק א וש”ך שם ס”ק ב, בשו”ע יו”ד סי’ רכח סעי’ א כתב שיש תקנה להתיר נדר ע”י חרטה לפני ג’ הדיוטות והוא דגמירי להו וסבירי.4 אמנם, ובחי’ רע”א סי’ רכח סעי’ כתב שאין להתיר אלא לפני ג’ שנתמלא זקנם משום דלא סמכינן על חזקה דרבא במידי דאורייתא. וע”ע בערוך השלחן שם סעי’ ד במה שהדיינים צריכים לדעת.פתח ועי’ כעי”ז בשם הגרי”ש אלישיב זצ”ל באשרי האיש יו”ד ח”א עמ’ רפז שלהתרת נדרים בערב ר”ה אפשר להקל לקחת ג’ שלא נתמלא,נראה שבחלת חו”ל שהוא דין דרבנן סגי בג’ שהם בגיל בר מצוה . ומהני אפילו בקרובים ובלילה, והשו”ע בסעי’ ג שם כתב שיאמרו לו ג’ פעמים מותר לך.)זקנם אם הם בני י”ג שנה ויום אחד (מפני שעיקר התרת נדרים בערב ר”ה הוא להנהגות טובות שאינם אלא מדרבנן שלאחר שאומר שמתחרט מעיקרא אומרים לו אילו, וכתב הרמ”א שם סעי’ ז שנהגו להחמיר לעשות מן החרטה פתח.וכתב הש”ך שם ס”ק ט שנוהגין בכל אופן שהמתירין יושבים והמודר עומד לפניהם ואע”פ שהב”ח שם כתב שיש להחמיר בזה באיסור. והשו”ע סי’ רלד סעי’ נז כתב שאין הבעל מצטרף עם ב’ להתיר נדרי אשתו בלשון התרה.ידעת שתתחרט כלום נדרת והוא אומר לא ואז מתירין לו כיון שהעיסה שלו והוי כמתיר לעצמו (הובא, מ”מ הרי הדעת קדושים סי’ שכג ס”ק ד כתב שבעל לא יצרף להיות מהמתירין לאשתו מטעם אחר,דאורייתא ומשמע שבחלת חו”ל שהוא דרבנן יש צד להקל . וכתב המ”ב שם ס”ק א דה”ה לצורך מצוה, ועי’ בשו”ע או”ח סי’ שמא סעי’ א שמתירים נדרים בשבת אם הוא לצורך השבת.)ג”כ במקדש מעט שם ס”ק יב אמנם בסי’ רלד סעי’ נו כתב השו”ע שהבעל נעשה שליח להשאל על נדרי אשתו ובלבד שמצא. השו”ע סי’ רכח סעי’ טז כתב שהנודר אינו עושה שליח לשאול על נדרו אלא צריך לבא בעצמו לפני המתירין.5 וכתב הערוך השלחן סי’ שכג סעי’ יד שלשאול על הפרשת חלה אין ביכולת רק הבעל הבית. והש”ך שם ס”ק עא הוסיף שאם נתנה לו רשות גם לקבצם ולהתיר יעשה,שלשה מקוצבים אבל הוא לא יקבצם . עי’ בשו”ת שבט הקהתי ח”ד סי’ רלט ובספר אשרי האיש יו”ד ח”ב עמ’ קצב אות לד, ובענין התרה ע”י טלפון.או בעלת הבית ולא אחר כבר,) ואף שהרש”ש בנדרים דף נט ע”א (ד”ה ודע) כתב שלא יברך על ההפרשה השניה וכ”כ בברכי יוסף סי’ שכג ס”ק א (מטעם אחר. כ”כ בשו”ת חת”ס יו”ד סי’ שכ הובא בפת”ש יו”ד סי’ שלא ס”ק ו.6 ועי’ בשו”ת מנחת שלמה ח”א סי’ סב אות יג ובספר. וגם הגר”ח קנייבסקי שליט”א בדרך אמונה פ”ד מהל’ תרומות ס”ק קפד פסק כדברי החת”ס,תמה בשו”ת אמרי יושר ח”ב סי’ מז על דברי הרש”ש . מעדני ארץ תרומות פ”ד הל’ יז מש”כ הגרש”ז אויערבאך זצ”ל בזה
Leadership in
Kashrus Education
5
C O N T I N U E D F R O M PA G E 3
mashkim and forbids its use for kosherization. However, the Remah permits kashering with sha’ar mashkim if one has already done the kosherization, b’dieved.2 It is STAR-K policy not to kasher with sha’ar mashkim. However, some kashrus agencies in the U.S. and Europe rely on the lenient position, even though the Shulchan Aruch frowns upon that method of kosherization. Another interesting caveat to this question is whether liquid chocolate, or more specifically cocoa butter which is a solid at room temperature, may be considered a liquid and could, therefore, be used as a kashering liquid. Interestingly enough, when the Mishna Berura discusses the issue of egg matzah the Chofetz Chaim, zt”l, mentions that fats are categorically considered a liquid,3 sha’ar mashkim, and would be permitted to be used as a kashering liquid for those who allow this type of kosherization. Milk Allergens To The Rescue Many companies do not keep their conches separate and will conch dark and milk chocolate interchangeably. However, milk is an allergen and in our “allergy ridden” world pareve chocolatiers owe milk a debt of gratitude. In order to keep dark chocolate allergen-free in some companies, the dark chocolate conches and the tempering lines have been segregated. Tempering is the process through which the liquid chocolate is cooled, giving it its luster and shine. It allows the liquid chocolate to solidify smoothly without any white spots. Typically, the tempering line is used for both milk and dark chocolate. In this case, the holding tanks, cooling tunnels and belts are totally separated so kashering with sha’ar mashkim has become a non-issue. Brochah Recited On Chocolate As we saw through our tour of chocolate manufacturing, the cacao bean is the fruit of the Forestaro and Criollo trees. However, the cocoa bean is indistinguishable in its chocolate form. The question is: Does a fruit product that has been pressed into a paste, such as dates into date paste or apricots into fruit leather, retain its Borei Pri Ha’etz status because the original product in its pressed version is recognizable? The Shulchan Aruch4 concludes that since the fruit product retains its original status, the brochah does not change. However, the Remah explains that this is not the case regarding a fruit that totally loses its original form. Therefore, the proper brochah for chocolate would be Shehakol. However, other halachic opinions posit that since the cacao bean was grown for the purpose of making chocolate, this is the essence of the fruit. In spite of the fact that it loses its original identity, the brochah should be Borei Pri Ha’etz. The case in point in the Shulchan Aruch5 discusses spices that were ground and sweetened. The brochah on sweetened ground spices is Borei Pri Ha’etz
because spices are made to be ground. Applying the same logic to the cacao bean, since the purpose of the cacao bean is to be ground and liquified into chocolate, some Poskim are of the opinion that the brochah on chocolate should be Borei Pri Ha’etz; the consensus of halachic opinion is that the brochah is Shehakol. It is a known fact that chocolate contains over 50% sugar. Sugar is processed from vegetables such as sugar cane or sugar beets. In truth, the Shulchan Aruch also deals with the brochah recited over sugar.6 In any event, the amount of sugar used would not affect the brochah on chocolate since the purpose of the sugar is to sweeten the cocoa ingredients. Sugar, therefore, is viewed as a secondary ingredient (tafel) to the cocoa liquor even though sugar is chocolate’s primary ingredient.7 According to all opinions, the brochah remains Shehakol. In the case of chocolate-covered nuts and fruits, such as peanuts, almonds or raisins, does the combination of chocolate with nuts or fruits affect the brochah? Most definitely! However, there are many opinions regarding the proper brochah. The Mishna Berura8 views the fruit as the ikar ingredient, and the chocolate that sweetens the fruit as secondary. The brochah on chocolate-covered fruits and nuts would follow the item that the chocolate is sweetening; in the case of fruit or nuts, Borei Pri Ha’etz, and in the case of peanuts, Borei Pri Hoadama. However, other Poskim reason that the brochah is subjective and would follow the item that is more desirous.9 Still others maintain that the item that is more plentiful would be the dominant ingredient, while some halachic authorities maintain that one should recite two brochos on chocolate-covered peanuts because both are of equal importance.10 Interestingly, the brochah of Borei Pri Ha’etz would suffice, b’dieved, for a chocolate and fruit combination because the brochah on chocolate may be Borei Pri Ha’etz,11 as mentioned earlier. Rabbi Moshe Heinemann, shlit”a, Rabbinic Administrator of STAR-K, maintains that the brochah is subjective. If the chocolate is more desirable, the brochah would be Shehakol; if the raisin is more desirable, the brochah on a chocolate covered raisin would be Borei Pri Ha’etz. Shlomo Hamelech, when extolling the virtues of Bnei Yisroel, Torah, and mitzvos exclaims metaphorically, “Vayochal p’ri megadav,” “And he ate His delectable fruits.” Indeed, this verse could certainly apply to the delights of chocolate, the most delicious fruit in the world. Many thanks to David Lachevere, of Cargill Chocolate, who graciously and enthusiastically reviewed this article.
2. Orach Chaim 425:5, Remah 3. Orach Chaim 462, Mishna Brura 26 4. Orach Chaim 202:7 5. Orach Chaim 203:7 6. Orach Chaim 202:15 7. Orach Chaim 203, M.B. 13 8. Orach Chaim 204, Be’er Hetev 19 9. Rav Ovadiah Yosef, zt”l 10. Rav Moshe Feinstein, zt”l, Orach Chaim III 31 11. Rav Yosef Shalom Elyashiv, zt”l (Yuva Moshe)
6
Leadership in
Kashrus Education
NEW UNDER STAR-K KOSHER CERTIFICATION NOAH’S ARK, SALAMI
CONSUMER PRODUCTS
Teaneck, NJ DELICATESSEN; MEAT/POULTRY PACKING
(only when bearing Star-K symbol)
ALBERTSONS, LLC
NORTHEAST MARKETING PINEAPPLE DIV.
Pleasanton, CA POPCORN
Lakeville, MA FRUIT (CANNED)
BRASSICA PROTECTION PRODUCTS
Baltimore, MD COFFEES; TEAS
THAILAND GLUTEN-FREE PRODUCTS; RICE THAILAND RICE
Cutchogue, NY SPICES & SEASONINGS
DEMOULAS SUPERMARKETS, INC.
Irose Park, IL VEGETABLES (CANNED)
EARTH FARE
Fletcher, NC FRUIT (CANNED)
EAT YOUR MAIL
Lakewood, NJ COOKIES
ENAXUS CO., LTD.
THAILAND COCONUT PRODUCTS
EURO MID INC.
Houston, TX PLASTIC FILMS
GROW & BEHOLD FOODS
Bronx, NY MEAT/POULTRY PACKING; POULTRY PRODUCTS (STAR-S)
HARRY & DAVID OPERATIONS
Medford, OR VEGETABLES (CANNED)
LA GENERALE ALIMENTAIRE JOUDA
TUNISIA SAUCES & DIPS
LEAHY-IFP
Glenview, IL FRUIT (CANNED)
LIDL US LLC
Arlington, VA SNACK FOODS; FRUIT (DEHYDRATED)
MAZZA ALIMENTARI S.R.L.
ITALY VEGETABLES (CANNED)
MILLPRESS IMPORTS LLC
Bethlehem, PA OLIVE OILS
NEW ORGANICS, INC.
Kenwood, CA COCONUT PRODUCTS
PEET’S COFFEE & TEA
GERMANY BAKERY SUPPLIES
REDHAWK FOODS
CHINA HERBAL EXTRACTS
SAMING FOOD CORP. PINEAPPLE DIV.
San Antonio, TX SNACK FOODS; NUTS & SEEDS
DESIGNPAC GIFTS LLC
CHINA FRUIT (CANNED): VEGETABLES (CANNED)
San Francisco, CA FRUIT (DEHYDRATED); SNACK FOODS
CST SERVICES, LLC NUTS & SNACKS DIV.
Tewksbury, MA COFFEES
OLIVES GARDENS
Emeryville, CA COFFEES
CHARISSA, LLC
FORTIS HYRUN
CHINA CELLULOSE
JORDAN OLIVES; VEGETABLES (CANNED)
CAPITAL CEREALS
CACTUS BOTANICS
CHINA AMINO ACIDS
NORTHERN FOOD I/E INC.
Westbury, NY VEGETABLES (DEHYDRATED)
BURAPA PROSPER
BOZKURT ZIRAI URUNLERI
TURKEY FRUIT (DRIED)
THAILAND FRUIT (CANNED)
SAVOR BRANDS, INC.
Chestfield, MO VEGETABLES (CANNED)
SERENDIPITEA
Manhasset, NY TEAS
STE LHDN SARL LES HUILERIES NARJIS
MOROCCO OLIVE OILS; OLIVES; DETERGENTS & CLEANSERS
GREEN GARDEN PRODUCE HAGENA GMBH & CO. HUNAN KANG BIOTECH OLIVES GARDENS
VENUS LABORATORIES EARTH FRIENDLY PRODUCTS, ECOS
ESTABLISHMENTS
TUNISIA SAUCES & DIPS
CAFÉ K-CONEY ISLAND
NANTONG HUGE BIO-TECH
CHINA VITAMINS & NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS
NEWSTAR GOURMET USA HARISSA DIV. OLEO ENERGIES, INC. OLIVES GARDENS
JORDAN OLIVES; VEGETABLES (CANNED)
PDL/PAPETERIES DU LEMAN
FRANCE PAPER PRODUCTS
PIYASIRI WANIT CO., LTD.
AGRI EXIM GLOBAL PHILIPPINES
INDONESIA CRUDE PALM OIL
Dartmouth, MA DETERGENTS/CLEANSERS
Brooklyn, NY RESTAURANT (DAIRY)
NEW UNDER STAR-D (only when bearing Star-D symbol)
The Star-D is a kashrus symbol of the National Council of Young Israel (NCYI). The Star-K, in its relationship with the NCYI, administers the kashrus of the Star-D. All Star-D products are dairy – cholov stam (non-cholov Yisroel).
ALLEGRA COFFEE
Naperville, IL BAKING MIXES
ALGONQUIN PRODUCTS
ZAOZHUANG KERUI CHERMICALS
LA GENERALE ALIMENTAIRE JOUDA
INDUSTRIAL/ INSTITUTIONAL PRODUCTS (see letter of certification)
CHILE FRUIT (DRIED)
WESTCO CHEMICAL, INC.
Modesto, CA DETERGENTS & CLEANSERS
CHINA HERBAL EXTRACTS; TEAS
THAILAND INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS
AGRO INDUSTRIA NEW AGRA LIMITADA
WACHSEN INDUSTRY
CHINA SOY PRODUCTS
UNITED KINGDOM VEGETABLES (DEHYDRATED)
Cypress, CA DETERGENTS & CLEANSERS
PHILIPPINES COCONUT PRODUCTS
Cypress, CA DETERGENTS & CLEANSERS
ZHEJIANG JIUSHENG TEA DEVELOPMENT
CANADA LUBRICANTS
TSAMMA, LLC
VENUS LABORATORIES EARTH FRIENDLY PRODUCTS, ECOS
J.L. PRIESTLEY FOOD INGREDIENTS
THE CLASS PRODUCE GROUP
Keenes, IL JUICE & JUICE CONCENTRATES
STEVIANA BIOSCIENCE
CHINA SWEETENERS
CHINA INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS
Brooklyn, NY SAUCES & DIPS
Jessup, MD FRUIT (FRESH PACKAGED); VEGETABLES (FRESH)
MOROCCO OLIVE OILS; OLIVES; DETERGENTS & CLEANSERS
JORDAN OLIVES; VEGETABLES (CANNED)
SUN HING FOOD
San Francisco, CA RICE
STE LHDN SARL LES HUILERIES NARJIS
PROFOOD INTERNATIONAL, INC. PT AGRO SARIMAS INDONESIA QIANJIANG XINYIHONG ORGANIC CHEMICAL
CHINA INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS
QUZHOU TIANSHENG PLANT EXTRACT
CHINA HERBAL EXTRACTS
Thornton, CO COFFEES
ASSOCIATED WHOLESALE GROCERS MILK DIV
Kansas City, KS DAIRY PRODUCTS
BANTAM BAGELS
Brooklyn, NY BAGELS
CHOCOLATE DEL CARIBE SA
HONDURAS CHOCOLATE PRODUCTS
LUND FOOD HOLDINGS
Edina, MN DAIRY PRODUCTS
MARVA MAID DAIRY, LLC
Newport News, VA DAIRY PRODUCTS; BEVERAGES & DRINK MIXES; ICE CREAM MIXES
METRO BRANDS
CANADA ICE CREAM CONES
WANDERING BEAR
New York, NY COFFEES
BOBAI WONWAY FOODS
CHINA FRUIT (CANNED)
Leadership in
SB BIOTECHNOLOGIES
FRANCE CULTURES
Kashrus Education
7
STAR-K CERTIFICATION, INC.
NON PROFIT ORG US POSTAGE PAID BROOKLYN, NY PERMIT #7379
122 Slade Avenue, Suite 300 Baltimore, Maryland 21208-4996
REGISTER YOUR STAR-K CERTIFIED APPLIANCE Stay informed with up-to-date information regarding your specific appliance. Visit www.star-k.org/appliance_registry to sign up.
STAR-K Kosher Certification A non-profit agency representing the Kosher consumer in promoting Kashrus through Education, Research and Supervision. FOUNDING EDITOR: A.J. Levin
Phone: (410) 484-4110 Fax: (410) 653-9294 E-mail: info@star-k.org www.star-k.org
EDITOR: Rabbi Tzvi Rosen MANAGING EDITOR: Mrs. Pesi Herskovitz COPY EDITOR/COORDINATOR: Ms. D. Rosenstein CONTRIBUTING WRITER: Mrs. Margie Pensak GRAPHIC ARTIST: Miss Hudi Neuberger
Copyright: 2017. STAR-K Certification, Inc. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without permission of STAR-K Certification, Inc.
Subscriptions
$10(USD) annually for 4 issues -US & Canada $15(USD) annually for 4 issues -Overseas
Kashrus Kurrents is also available online at www.star-k.org/kashrus-kurrents. To receive an email when the most recent issue has been uploaded, please send an email to kashruskurrents-subscribe@star-k.org.
This publication is dedicated to the memory of M. Leo Storch, of blessed memory, through a grant from Mrs. M. Leo Storch & Family.
(The STAR-K Passover Book, not included in this subscription, is available for purchase in Jewish bookstores during the Passover season.)
Name ________________________________________________ Address _______________________________________________ City _________________ State _________ Zip _______________ Phone ________________________________________________ Please send your tax deductible checks made payable to: KASHRUS KURRENTS 122 Slade Avenue, Suite 300, Baltimore, MD 21208-4996 Phone: (410) 484-4110 • Fax: (410) 653-9294
Download our STAR-K app on your Android and Apple Smartphones. Available on the App Store, Google Play, and Amazon Kindle.
Receive late breaking kashrus news and alerts in your email. Send an email to alerts-subscribe@star-k.org or visit www.star-k.org/alerts
8
Leadership in
Kashrus Education