Honi Soit: Week 2, Semester 1, 2020

Honi Soit Week 2, Semester 1, 2020 / First printed 1929

Memories of Manning Bar / p. 11 The Western roots of coronavirus / p. 8

Why collective autonomy should be abolished / p. 10

Vignettes of Hong Kong, January 2020 / p. 16

Acknowledgement of Country Honi Soit is published on the stolen land of the Gadigal People of the Eora Nation. For over 230 years, First Nations people in this country have suffered from the destructive effects of invasion. The editors of this paper recognise that, as a team of settlers occupying the lands of the Bidjigal, Darug, Gadigal, Wangal and Wallumedegal people, we are beneficiaries of these reverberations that followed European settlement. As we strive throughout the year to offer a platform to the voices mainstream media ignores, we cannot meet this goal without providing a space for First Nations people to share their experiences and perspectives. A student paper which does not acknowledge historical and ongoing colonisation and the white supremacy embedded within Australian society can never adequately represent the students of the institution in which it operates. We seek to resist colonial violence and the racist power structures that serve to oppress those who are Indigenous to this land. Sovereignty was never ceded. Always was and always will be Aboriginal land.

Contents What’s on / 2 Gossip / 3 News / 4 Analysis / 6 Opinion / 9 Multilingual / 11 Feature / 12 Culture / 14 Perspective / 16 SRC/ 20 Comedy / 22

Editorial Editor in Chief: Nina Dillon Britton Editors: Nina Dillon Britton, Matthew Forbes, Zhiquan Gan, Robbie Mason, Angad Roy, Lara Sonnenschein, Ranuka Tandan, Chuyi Wang, Madeline Ward, Lei Yao. Contributors: Dr. Thomas J Adams, Michael Albinowski, Kiki Amberber, Jocelin Chan, Felix Faber, Deaglan Godwin, Vivienne Guo, Josh Höhne, Marlow Hurst, Kedar Maddali, Shania O’Brien, Himath Sriniwasa, Lucy Taylor. Artists: Shrawani Bhattarai, Ben Lopes, Kate Scott. Cover artist: Claire Ollivain

In the first couple of weeks of my first year at uni, I would sit out on the Manning Bar terrace on a Tuesday afternoon with a handful of people I’d tentatively began to call friends to read that week’s edition of Honi Soit. Speaking to people for this week’s editorial about the Manning Bar they knew in the 80s, 90s and 2000s, the Manning I knew was in many ways unchanged. Sticky floors, mis-matched decor, sagging couches. But mainly, it was just empty. So many have mourned the loss of Manning Bar, both former students who saw its heyday and students our age who performatively mourn its absence from their imagined campus lives. But for those of us that never knew the Manning that deserved to be missed, what should be missed is a space for atomised, lonely students to congregate (have a beer) and talk. To create something of a unified student life. In his story of the Theatresports at Manning Bar the day after 9/11 (p. 12), Rob Carlton describes the bar as a space of collective grieving and joy. What spaces of collective anything exist today on campus?

Student culture is eroded by the same things that erode so much else that is valuable in life. Economic precarity, political alienation, the corruption of small-time (student) politicians, creeping neoliberalisation and our soulless participation in it all. But spaces like this (small, often insignificant) paper carve out a space resistant to these trends. It’s a place for irreverence (p. 23), reflection (p. 11-18) and gossip (p. 3). Duncan Kennedy, in his caustic analysis of the hierarchy of law schools, reminds us that it’s exactly the role of students to carve out these spaces of resistance. It’s a place where we create something of a unified vibrant campus life, however illusory that may be. Obviously, the role of an editor in that creation is incredibly small. I’d like to thank everyone who shared their memories of Manning Bar with me, and the reporters who contributed pieces to this edition. In particular, Claire Ollivain for this edition’s cover art, which is the most beautiful memorial of our famously ugly bar. Yours, in solidarity, Nina Dillon Britton

Disclaimer: Honi Soit is published by the Students’ Representative Council, University of Sydney, Level 1 Wentworth Building, City Road, University of Sydney NSW 2006. The SRC’s operation costs, space and administrative support are financed by the University of Sydney. Honi Soit is printed under the auspices of the SRC’s directors of student publications: Maia Edge, Peiqing Fan, Nina Mountford, Roisin Murphy, Mikaela Pappou and Maxim Vishney. All expressions are published on the basis that they are not to be regarded as the opinions of the SRC unless specifically stated. The Council accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any of the opinions or information contained within this newspaper, nor does it endorse any of the advertisements and insertions. Please direct all advertising inquiries to publications.manager@src.usyd.edu.au.

What’s on this week For those fighting the good fight! Panel - 2020 queer activism; challenges facing queer communities When: 3rd March, 1pm - 3pm Where: Hermann’s Bar Price: Free

Our House is on Fire When: 3rd March, 4pm - 5:30pm Where: Law Foyer, New Law Price: Free via registration

Mercury in Retrograde Drinks - StarSoc Inaugural Event! When: 4th March 6pm - 8pm Where: Courtyard Restaurant and Bar Price: $3 for members, $5 for non-members

Come and listen to a collection of speakers from University Collectives and others about the current challenges facing queer communities and how students can get involved via different forms and strategies. Play a drinking game! Drink every time you hear the words “intersectional,” “activism,” and “capitalism.”

Join Christopher Wright, a professor at the Business School who researches business responses to climate change, sustainability and critical understandings of capitalism. He will be discussing how universities can become advocates for climate change and what individuals can do to engage their respective communities, in the face of a “business as usual” attitude by the government. Be careful not to think about your own carbon footprint because some might condemn you for being selfish and not fighting the system and destroying corporations with your own crowbar!

If you didn’t get a chance to read Pulp’s ‘Enneagram Series’ about the nine interconnected personality types based on psycho-spiritual South American spiritualists, here’s another chance to connect mind-body-soul. Get some practice neglecting all of your responsibilities before you start requesting extensions during exam time and pay some money for the potential (??) of pizza and drinks.

2

LETTERS

Letters Sudoku is for nerds Good morning and welcome back to the Honi Team, Except nothing is good and my displeasure is paramount. It is now my second week back at University and one item on the small list of things keeping me here is your paper. Is it for the witty headlines? The cutting edge feature stories? Or even the satirical comment on our diverse university society? The answer, to all three of these questions, is no. It is for one page and one page alone. It resides in the back tenth and stares down the satire section with daring and intrigue. I am, of course, talking about the puzzle section and specifically the sudoku. Now if you pick up the latest paper you will find no sudoku, but an experimentally fruity find a word. Now this was enjoyable up until the point where I realised that this is

Goodbye Simon

Um?

Dear Editors,

Dear Editors, Newspapers are cool and I like them. This is not a placeholder because we had to remove a letter due to being potentially defamatory. Defamation law is cool and good.

Wake you bunch of fuckwits......go stuff your conservative beliefs up your miserable ass. Bunch of cunts.

Excellent work with your investigation of this homophobe, although I don’t believe he should’ve been allowed to resign, the University should of fired him. What’s more concerning is how he got the job in the first place. I believe there is obviously high level corruption involved and someone should report the facts to ICAC (As Hardman was a serving Police officer at the time of gaining the job) I would do so, however I don’t have all the facts. Perhaps someone, like yourselves or SRC can look into filing a report to NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption, to prevent something like this happening again.

- Pierre Feletti

- Jane (Concerned student)

another puzzle I can add to my list of games that are inferior to the nonet of numbers. True, love is in the air and in the writing of the Crossword, and I shed a tear for Manning Bar in the Target, but do not dare Manning Bar my sudoku. Each week I will pick up your paper, and each week I will recycle it, but as a man standing up when others might not, please give me my numerical negotiation. Yours truly, one of the last sudoku enthusiasts, Rory.

We love our fans!

- A human person

Nudes, declarations of affection and hate mail may be sent to editors@honisoit.com

Weekly Vibe check: failed If you haven’t seen the SASS Welcome to Uni Party video yet, we suggest you watch it immediately. It explains why they barely managed a half-full room of tired old Liberal and Unity hacks doing their best impressions of Real Human University Students.

Loose lips sink (USU) ships Honi (Spice, 2019) alum, Carrie Wen, is reported to have drunkenly decided to run for USU and at a SULS event, no less! We wish Capricious Carrie all the best in her political endeavours. The identity of Benny Shen’s “friend” has been further revealed to be someone in Panda called Vicky. Vicky Who? We don’t know. A distinguished member of the Young Liberals by the name of Ben

Hines is allegedly also running. Boring Ben is a SUBS/SULS double who. We hope he knows how to use facetune! Plotter Prudence has certainly been plotting! In the SRC president’s office, no less. Plotter Prudence, Joker Julie and Liam “Doon” Donohoe were seen conspiring in our favourite basement early last week.

Naughty Boy DJ Albo took some time out of his busy schedule to flip off some filthy queers this weekend. In a video of the incident, the No Pride In Detention and Homos Against Scomo contingent are heard chanting “One, Two, Three, Fuck the ALP” at the ALP Mardi Gras contingent, which included the Opposition Leader. Evan Van Zijl, a spokesperson of No Pride In Detention, told Honi “this is indicative of the ALP’s response to refugee

rights and protestors more generally. Labor has turned its backs on us, and turned its back on its own voter base.” “We will continue to oppose Labor’s inhumane refugee policy on the streets and on Palm Sunday.” The incident also drew criticism from the NUS Queer Department, who claimed Albo had given UNSW Education Officer Shovan Bhattarai the finger after she confronted him over the ALP’s support of the Religious Exemptions Bill. But not everyone was so unhappy, like USU President Connor Wherret, who commented “good on him!” in a Facebook post about the incident. Woke King!

Bake Sale | USyd Collectives When: 5th March, 9am - 4pm Where: Eastern Avenue Price: Varied

International Women’s Day 2020 When: 7th March, 11am-2pm Where: Hyde Park Price: Free

I don’t know how much I trust goods baked by students. Bob Katter this week condemned vegan meat pies being sold at the footy; I wonder if Adriano Zumbo might come out in protest against the advertisement of vegan options at this sale! Regardless, just as yuppies pretend to enjoy green juice ice blocks or vegan fried chicken, you can come and pretend to enjoy vegan cupcakes. The collectives will be fundraising for Indigenous communities that have been affected by black deaths in custody. All proceeds will go to families that have been directly affected, so come and show your support.

Join a congregation of entertainment, food trucks and Incel despisers at the annual International Women’s Day march. Brainstorm ways to engage m*n in the movement, not just those that you’ve probably read about on the @beam_me_up_softboi Instagram page and be aware that there’s a lot more to Western feminism than meets the eye.

Image: LGBTI Rights Australia

Write, create and produce for Honi Soit Interested in reporting or making art for Australia’s only remaining weekly student newspaper? Email us at editors@honisoit.com or message us over on our Facebook, Twitter or Instagram pages.

3

NEWS

Coronial inquiry fails to deliver justice for Eric Whittaker Kedar Maddali and Vivienne Guo report. This article discusses Aboriginal deaths in custody. On Friday morning, a small contingent gathered at the NSW State Coroner’s Court to hear the final findings of a three-year long coronial inquest, demanding justice for the death of Eric Whittaker. Eric Whittaker was a proud Kamilaroi man and a father of four children. Whittaker died in custody in Westmead Hospital on 4 July 2017, shackled to a bed despite being unresponsive and unconscious. The cause of Whittaker’s death was found to be a subarachnoid brain haemorrhage. The final findings of the Court, delivered by State Coroner Magistrate O’Sullivan, noted that Whittaker made a total of 20 calls on the emergency intercom system between 4:00AM and 7:00AM from his cell in Parklea Correctional Centre, pleading for help. Yet, not a single welfare check was made, despite the fact that Whittaker had been heard shouting in a distressed

tone, pleading for help and asking to be let out. The Coroner acknowledged the failures of the correctional officers, noting that Whittaker’s inability to coherently describe a medical condition led to Correctional Officer James Dobry’s belief that Whittaker did not have any condition. Dobry was one of four correctional officers who were cited in the Coroner’s findings. It was found that it should have been reasonably known to the officers that Whittaker needed urgent medical attention. The Coroner acknowledged that a critical three hours was wasted by the officers’ negligence, saying that the officers “failed to recognise the signs of a medical emergency [which] resulted in a delay of care to Eric that is disgraceful… The vital hours to treat Eric’s condition were lost.” Though the Coroner was unsure that earlier intervention could have spared his life, it was noted that Whittaker would have had a significantly higher chance of surviving. The GEO

Group, who were responsible for the management of Parklea Correctional Centre during the time of Eric’s death, gave evidence that internal disciplinary action had already been taken against the officers responsible. Another focus of the Coroner’s findings was the unjust shackling of Whittaker. Though restraints are intended to be a last resort measure, an unconscious Whittaker was shackled by hospital staff in the Intensive Care Unit. The Coroner found there was no justification to shackle a completely unconscious person to a hospital bed and this action was “disrespectful, degrading and unnecessary.” Some nominal administrative changes were made to lessen the use of restraints on inmates when admitted to hospital. Professor Holdgate, one of the medical experts that was called to examine the circumstances of Eric’s death, describes the photograph as “horrific.” The coronial inquest of Eric Whittaker is one in a long and abhorrent history of systemic injustice for families

affected by deaths in custody. Despite acknowledging that Indigenous deaths in custody “continue to be a national shame”, the Coroner went on to claim that improving this unjust system was “beyond the power of this court”, seemingly absolving the Court of responsibility to provide any justice for Whittaker’s family. The Coroner closed the hearing by echoing the Uluru Statement from the Heart: “Proportionally, [Indigenous people] are the most incarcerated people on the planet. We are not an innately criminal people… Our youth languish in detention in obscene numbers. They should be our hope for the future.” Disclaimer: Nina Dillon Britton was not involved in the editing or publication of this article.

Student leaders call for Bettina Arndt to be stripped of Order of Australia STUDENTS’ REPRESENTATIVE COUNCIL LEGAL SERVICE

Robbie Mason reports. 18 student presidents across Australia, including USyd’s Liam Donohoe and Connor Wherrett, have stood in solidarity to sign a letter requesting Bettina Arndt’s award as a Member of the Order of Australia be revoked. The letter was penned by National Women’s Officer for the National Union of Students (NUS), Humaira Nasrin. The women’s department write that “the actions and comments made by Ms Bettina Arndt have dishonoured the values that are upheld by the Order and bring the Order into disrepute.” As an example of the numerous instances in which “Arndt has acted disrespectfully towards victims of gender-based violence,” the letter highlights Ardnt’s recent tweet concerning Rowan Baxter’s murder of Hannah Clarke and her three children. Arndt tweeted on 21 February: “Congratulations to the Queensland police for keeping an open mind and awaiting proper evidence, including the possibility that Rowan Baxter might have been ‘driven too far’.” The letter labels this tweet “a direct insult to not only to the memory of Ms Hannah Clarke and her children, but to the memory of all individuals that have lost their lives to domestic and family violence.” The letter underlines Arndt’s repeated attempts to defend convicted paedophiles and shift blame to sexual

4

assault survivors: “Such attitudes… normalise violence and this, in turn, can exacerbate the risk to the community.” Particular issue is taken with the consideration of Ardnt’s 2018 “Fake Rape Crisis” campus tour as an “achievement.” This tour met with fierce resistance from concerned student activists, in the wake of repeated sexual assault scandals on campus and investigations into entrenched sexism in Sydney Univerity colleges. “During this tour Ms Arndt has minimised sexual assault referring to it as ‘regret sex’, while advising students that ‘no doesn’t always mean no’ in relation to sexual consent. These views are out of step with acceptable values and place students at increased risk.” Arndt misleadingly represented herself as a clinical psycholigist despite lacking professional accreditation. As a recent New Matilda report illuminated, Ardnt has, with the support of sections of the Australian press, claimed for over thirty years credentials and expertise she does not possess. With the Federal Government near unanimously passing a motion to strip Ardnt of her award, this letter applies further pressure on the Council for the Order of Australia.

Did you know Sydney Uni undergraduate students* can get FREE advice from our registered Migration Agent? Ask the SRC Legal Service! *USyd undergraduates only. SUPRA offers assistance to USyd postgraduate students *SUPRA offers assistance to USyd postgraduate students

SRC Legal Service Level 1, Wentworth Building (G01), University of Sydney NSW 2006 PO Box 794 Broadway NSW 2007

p: 02 9660 5222 int: 12871 e: solicitor@src.usyd.edu.au w: srcusyd.net.au

/usydsrc @src_usyd

NEWS

Activists occupy Sydney Maritime Museum in opposition to replica HMS Endeavour voyage Kedar Maddali reports. Activists orchestrated a sit-in yesterday in the Sydney Maritime Museum, opposing the planned circumnavigation of the HMS Endeavour around Australia. The Australian government has spent $6.7 million on the venture, which marks the 250th anniversary of the arrival of Captain Cook to the continent. The sit-in, organised by the Aboriginal Tent Embassy in Redfern, blocked the entrance to the museum, filling the lobby with chants of “always was, always will be Aboriginal land.” A number of community leaders gave

speeches to the assembly, including Jenny Munro, a prominent Wiradjuri activist. Speaking to the group, she highlighted that colonists did not come here to negotiate as “there were no words when the bullet pierced the Gweagal shield.” The speech concluded, saying, “this is a pretend boat, going on a pretend voyage around a pretend country.” Lizzie Jarrett, a Gumbaynggirr, Bundjalung, Dunghutti activist, also spoke to the assembly, questioning the reluctance of the museum to negotiate

with First Nations peoples. Police presence at the protest escalated rapidly during the peaceful sit-in. Within 15 minutes from the commence of the sit-in, the number of police quadrupled. By the end of the sit-in, eight police vans and nearly 25 police officers in riot gear were present, approximately one officer for every three protestors. The protestors were eventually forced out of the museum by a line of police officers. Many First Nations communities and activist groups have condemned the

planned circumnavigation, criticising it as celebrating the brutal colonisation and genocide of the continent. The voyage was originally scheduled to begin “late February” but facing pressure from numerous activist groups the museum has delayed to the 28th of April. The ship is due to depart for its circumnavigation of the continent starting from Botany Bay, the site of the first Indigenous genocide.

Staff push to keep day of leave after Mardi Gras Deaglan Godwin reports. Staff at the Higher Degree by Research Administration Centre (HDRAC) are in the midst of a battle with University of Sydney management over the recognition of Mardi Gras celebrations as a significant cultural event. In previous years, HDRAC staff participating in the University’s parade float were entitled to an additional day off as special leave following the Mardi Gras weekend. This has facilitated their participation in Mardi Gras festivities, which extend deep into Saturday night and often include Sunday. This year, as management has revoked the right to this extra day of leave, many HDRAC staff will be participating without pay in the University of Sydney’s own Mardi Gras float. As a result, thirty staff members have sent an open letter to the director of Human Resources (HR), stating that “we feel it is a significant retrograde step for the university to deny staff special leave. There is no wording within the Staff Leave Policy, the EBA or the HR

website on special leave that precludes LGBTQI staff members requesting a day of leave for what is an extremely important cultural event. Nor is there any language preventing management from granting such a day of special leave, which helps to facilitate worker participation in the Mardi Gras.” For oppressed minorities whose holidays are not recognised by the Christian calendar and public holidays, special leave for cultural events is an important condition that allows staff time off for Ramadan, Hanukkah and other such events. Mardi Gras, the staff argue, is a very important day for LGBTQI people, and should be recognised as such. As one worker declared, “It is gay Christmas!” The issue of leave being revoked is particularly affronting to some staff, due to the university’s purportedly pro-LGBTQI image. For example, the University is a co-sponsor of the Mardi Gras event, and yet staff who attend this event, many on behalf of the University,

will go uncompensated. In a public statement posted to the university’s Yammer network, National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU) branch president Kurt Iveson said, “Staff participating in the University’s float are expected to attend several rehearsal sessions to participate in the parade and in doing so, commit hours of unpaid work to represent the university. They will be representing the university from 2pm on Saturday until very late into the evening. Staff have also been giving up their lunch breaks and personal time to create costumes for the parade. The university will showcase staff efforts by using footage of their float in the university’s promotional video. Participants of the parade have also been asked to take over the Instagram story for the university during the parade.” Staff also took a photo in protest against the pushback, with one placard reading: “USYD: Happy for us to represent but not reward.”

The dispute comes in the context of the University submitting for the Australian Workplace Equality Index (AWEI), where it will be promoting its own progress made in the area of LGBTQI workplace inclusion. The open letter continues, “it is a shame for the university to be concurrently denying special leave for participants of the parade as well as promoting itself as an inclusive workplace. The LGBTQI community are one of the highest risk groups for mental health problems and suicide, and the university should be aware that exclusionary decisions such as this contribute to the issue.” Staff and the union plan to continue their campaign until they win. Students should stand in solidarity against this attack on queer rights.

Defamation claims against former Honi Soit editor thrown out of court Robbie Mason reports. Patrick Massarani, a former member of the University of Sydney Senate, has had his defamation claim relating to sexual assault allegations in a 2015 Honi Soit article, thrown out of court. The article, published in print on 30 July 2015 and the next day online, exposed the nefarious power dynamics embedded in relationships between female students and USyd staff and the failure of university bureaucracies to adequately deal with cases of sexual misconduct. It stated that an unnamed

former member of the university’s governing board had sexually harassed six women. The day after the article’s publication, Massarani had requested that a vital identifying factor be removed. The Honi editing team immediately acquiesced and altered the text to make it harder to identify Massarani. It was only three and a half years later, after a third party inquired into whether Massarani was the aggressor, that Massarani launched legal action.

The fact that this third party “had to check her suspicions with the first defendant suggests that identification of the plaintiff to other persons from the website alone would be a task of very great difficulty.” Massarani faced serious difficulty proving the proliferation of the Honi article on Facebook and online as an archived article since “the purpose of archives is to store information, not to attract an audience of readers; they are designed to be searched by persons

seeking specific information, generally as a result of information from another source.” Massarani’s claims fell apart because the case was “an abuse of process”. The legal costs and court resources required to determine the claim was disproportionate to the interests at stake.

5

ANALYSIS

Fifty years in the making: How USyd students supported Bougainville’s independence movement Michael Albinowski on the role of the Sydney student movement in Bougainville’s fight for independence. In December 2019, the people of Bougainville, a small island province of Papua New Guinea, voted in an independence referendum. The result, though not binding, was unequivocal 98.31 per cent of participants voted in favour of independence. For many, the name ‘Bougainville’ might evoke images of a flower rather than a small island in Melanesia with nearly 250,000 inhabitants. But both the flower and the island are namesakes of the same person - Louis-Antoin de Bougainville, a French explorer who circumnavigated the globe and visited the island in the late 18th century. Apart from the name of the island itself, there are other place names in the Pacific that are reminders of Bougainville and Papua New Guinea’s (PNG) colonial subjugation. The Bismarck Sea (named after German Chancellor Otto von Bismarck) and Empress Augusta Bay both harken back to the time the area spent under the control of the German Empire. The islands of New Britain and New Ireland also demonstrate how unimaginative colonists were when it came to names. While the referendum result was a resounding success for those who fought for independence, it simultaneously serves as a sobering reminder of what Bougainville has endured throughout its history. Tensions on the island began to flare in the late 1960s and early 1970s. At this point in time the island was under Australia’s dominion as part of the territory of Papua and New Guinea. In 1969, Conzinc Rio Tinto Australia (CRA), an Australian subsidiary of Rio Tinto-Zinc Corporation, began the construction of the massive Panguna copper mine. Bougainvilleans, well aware of the environmental and social damage that could result from the project, began to protest. One demonstration that captured the attention of the Australian media was a protest in the Rorovana village, where female landowners resisted the acquisition of their land for the construction of a port. Bougainvilleans were not alone in their fight against CRA. On 6 August 1969, the communist newspaper Tribune reported that several USyd students were protesting at CRA’s Sydney offices. The protest was organised by the ‘Students for a Democratic Society Racial Action Committee’. Students presented letters of protests to directors at CRA and distributed leaflets to the public. Just a day later on 7 August, a lengthy article about Bougainville was published in Honi. An anonymous correspondent lamented the lack of democracy in the territory, explaining that Indigenous Bougainvilleans felt that they were only being consulted on matters relating to the mine on a post hoc basis. Unlike other protestors, the author opined that independence was not necessary. Instead, they suggested that a beneficial partnership between Australia and

6

the island could be formed as long as Australia stopped making ‘paternalistic’ decisions. Two weeks later, the Tribune reported on another protest for the rights of Bougainvilleans. The article mentioned that students from ‘Sydney’s three universities’ distributed a petition to 50 foreign embassies in Canberra (in 1969 the three universities in Sydney were USyd, UNSW and a fledgling Macquarie University). The petition was simple - it pleaded with the international community to uphold the rights of Bougainvillean landowners.

of PNG entirely, with the territory becoming an independent nation in 1975. A fortnight before PNG became independent, Bougainville declared its independence as the Republic of the North Solomons. This attempt at sovereignty was short lived - the island was reintegrated into PNG in 1976 again with the condition of greater autonomy. After this point, references to the island in student newspapers seem to dwindle. But autonomy was only a band-aid solution to longstanding tensions on the island, which continued to simmer

Later that year, Honi reported that students from USyd and the University of Newcastle were protesting at Sulphide Corporation’s Sydney offices, a subsidiary of CRA. Several students held a sit-in at the offices and were then arrested. The article mentions the possibility of students paying fines and court costs, though it is unclear whether this eventuated. By 1972, mining had commenced on the island despite extensive opposition. The Australian government was able to quell tensions on the island by performing an act typical of colonial administrations who feel their grip on their subjects slipping - it increased the island’s autonomy. However the Australian government soon lost control

into the late 1980s. These tensions boiled over in 1988 when the Panguna Landowners Association (PLA) demanded compensation from CRA. One major issue was that the mine was exacerbating wealth disparities, as government compensation schemes for the acquisition of land were highly flawed. A 1999 inquiry into Bougainville conducted by the Australian House of Representatives noted that land compensation schemes contradicted traditional clan-based ownership. For example, CRA frequently provided compensation to the primary claimants of land, ignoring complex forms of land ownership whereby there could be many subsidiary landowners. As a result, monetary compensation for land

acquisitions was concentrated in a small number of individuals, leaving many landowners feeling short-changed. Another issue which caused ire among Bougainvilleans was the environmental impact of the mine, which natives had correctly anticipated well before its construction. During the operation of the mine, its tailings (the remaining waste after valuables are extracted from ore) were deposited in rivers. It was expected that these tailings would eventually flow into the ocean, whereupon they would mostly be harmful to the sea floor. However this failed to eventuate - most of the tailings never made it to the ocean and instead remained dormant in rivers, causing significant damage. After the rejection of their demands by CRA, members of the PLA began to hinder operations at the Panguna mine. The association soon morphed into the Bougainvillean Revolutionary Army, the Panguna mine was shuttered, and a civil war had begun. USyd students continued their involvement in protests during the civil war. In March 1994, an article in Tharunka detailed a rainy, late night protest at USyd’s Holme building. A trade union dinner was being held inside the building, attended by the then Labor foreign minister Gareth Evans, who had disavowed secession movements in PNG. Over 300 people attended the event. Many attendants were students, as the demonstration was supported by USyd’s SRC. The civil war concluded in 1998 with the Bougainville Peace Agreement. One condition of the agreement was that PNG would facilitate an independence referendum on the island within 15-20 years. Bougainvilleans initially lobbied for the referendum to be binding but acquiesced in the face of opposition from PNG, hoping instead that a clear result in favour of independence would force PNG to respect the outcome. Despite the uncertainty that has prevailed in the months since the result was announced, the fight for Bougainvillean sovereignty reveals how vital perseverance is in order for an activist movement to succeed. Bougainville’s fight for self-rule has been intergenerational, enduring for over 50 years. This was the case not only in Bougainville itself, but also on campus. In the span of those fifty years, 10,000 to 15,000 Bougainvillean civilians lost their lives in a pointless civil war. The unnecessary human and environmental costs of conflict on the island remain the fault of those who refused to heed the prescient voices of Bougainvilleans. After 20 years of peace, hopefully this time the emphatic desire for sovereignty expressed by Bougainvilleans will be respected. Image: illustration from an August 1969 edition of Honi Soit.

ANALYSIS

Apologist institutions are writing the narrative of victim-blaming in Australia Lucy Taylor on the role powerful institutions play in upholding patriarchal narratives on domestic violence. On Wednesday the 19th of February, a man murdered his ex-partner and three children by dousing them with petrol and setting them alight in a car in Camp Hill, east of Brisbane. Hannah Clarke (31) and her children Aaliyah, Laianah and Trey (6, 4 and 3) lost their lives in the most abhorrent, brutal way. Statistically, by the time this article is published, another woman will already have been murdered by a present or former partner. In the immediate wake of the murders, headlines ran as follows: Former Rugby star and three children die in car fire tragedy (The Standard); ‘Goodnight my babies’: Camp Hill car fire dad’s Facebook posts leading up to horror (News.com.au); Ex-NRL player Rowan Baxter dies alongside his three kids, estranged wife in Brisbane car fire tragedy (FOX Sports); Dad’s Haunting posts before car fire tragedy takes three children (Seven News). The official police statement on the matter came from Detective Inspector Mark Thompson, who asked,“is [this] an instance of a husband being driven too far by issues he’s suffered by certain circumstances into committing acts of this form?” These are just some instances of the institutionalised victim-blaming and sympathy for violent men that have arisen from the Camp Hill murders. They humanise a man who murdered his wife and kids by reminding us that he was a sportsman and a father. They are suggesting that somehow society is

able to collectively rationalise his actions and accept the loss of four lives. When powerful institutions like the media and the police force platform this kind of apologist rhetoric, they open up a grey area in the public square, where one can begin to justify Baxter’s actions, rather than framing them as symptomatic of the rampant and systemic issue that is domestic violence in Australia. The media has told us that Baxter was a good man who fell from grace, an ex-sports hero, a loving father who was driven over the edge. We are time and time again presented with notions of ‘incident’ or ‘tragedy’ instead of ‘crime’ and ‘murder’, in a way that absolves this man of responsibility. These misuses of language are insidious. In understating the morbidity of Baxter’s actions, the media and the police force are dampening our outrage and our grief in a way that goes to the heart of this nation’s refusal to hold men to account for treating the women in their lives violently. We cannot forget the racial caveat in this issue either; as discussed by activist against men’s violence Tarang Chawla on ABC’s The Drum, the apologist standpoints taken in the media are only enabled because Baxter was a white, Australian sportsman — he was “one of the boys.” If Baxter were a migrant or person of colour, the media’s coverage would undoubtedly take this into account in their reporting. Conversely, domestic violence victims who are people of colour (and especially

Indigenous women) often fail to make headlines at all. The mainstream media has failed to report on the inarguable facts of the case: murderer Rowan Baxter had a history of domestic violence and was known to police. In December, Hannah Clarke left the relationship to go live with her parents. Shortly afterwards, he abducted their 4-year-old daughter for 4 days. Weeks ago, he breached a Domestic Violence Order. We know that 50% of domestic violence homicides occur within three months of separation, and that Baxter had a long history of using methods of coercive control. These facts are a checklist of warning signs for what became the worst possible fate for Hannah and her children. Every time our institutions enable us to forgive a man who has murdered a woman, they stagnate any traction the movement to combat domestic and family violence might have gained. We are stuck in the pattern of repeating the statistic that ‘one woman each week is killed in Australia by a partner or former partner’ as if it were a catchphrase for this nation’s identity. However, we watch on as nothing is done to prevent Hannah Clarke’s murder from happening over and over again. Politicians have offered their sympathies, yet domestic and family violence services are continually being stripped of government support while communities are “begging [the government] for money to keep people safe.”

Mere days after the murders, the Morrison government announced that 2.4 million dollars would be given to fund men’s behavioural reform programs. This move has been criticised by domestic violence specialists, who see it as a trojan horse for government inaction on domestic violence. Chief executive of family violence prevention services Men’s Referral Service and No To Violence Jacqui Watt has called this move “a drop in the bucket of what’s needed.” Watt claims that government funding decisions surrounding these programs have left men at risk of using violence with waiting lists as long as six months. Women’s crisis shelters are also criminally underfunded and under-resourced: more than 50% of women seeking crisis accommodation are turned away every day, leaving them with nowhere to go during what is potentially the most high-risk time. If a man incinerating his partner and children isn’t going to drive policymakers, media outlets and the general public to act seriously to combat Australia’s domestic violence epidemic, what will? Women and children are being murdered by men who are meant to protect them. Our institutions are designed to keep us informed and safe and they are failing us. This betrayal is twofold, and we should be gutted and angry. More than this, we should be even more hellbent on fighting to end the scourge of domestic violence in Australia.

Class appropriation in Australian fashion Madeline Ward wants yuppie cunts to fuck off. Cultural appropriation is perhaps the most overused and misunderstood concept of contemporary social politics. Despite its proliferation in almost every aspect of cultural dialogue, the cultural appropriation discussion often neglects issues of class, particularly the way that class manifests in the appropriation of fashion and dress. The practice of the upper classes taking the fashion and uniform of the working classes and re-establishing them as high fashion, often described as “class appropriation”, is nothing new. Dr Martens, now found on the feet of everyone from university students to Bella Hadid, were once worker’s boots. In the 70 years since their creation, their signification - the meaning we ascribe to their wearer or the act of wearing them - has been transformed and retransformed as they’ve been worn by different social groups and subcultures. They’ve been adopted by both the right and left side of politics, the wearing of them indicating their owner’s beliefs in anything from facism to anti-facism and anything in between. Their significance as footwear for factory workers and postmen has long past. Dr Martens are no longer a current convincing example of

class appropriation, because time has attributed their social meaning significant fluidity. Blundstone, their Australian near-equivalent, are a more interesting contemporary example. Once the mainstay of construction sites Australia-wide, Blundstones are now equally as common on the footpaths of Crown or King street. A middle class alternative to RM Williams, Blundstones are the cooler counterpart due to their perceived authenticity, their immediate connection to worker culture, and the fact that they aren’t the preferred footwear of the Liberal party. Blundstones are representative of the uneasy line that class appropriation straddles: the wearer wants to be perceived as authentic, without seeming so authentic that they are mistaken for a member of the class that their clothes are referencing. They’re an immediate reference to a moment of Australian working class culture that is now (again) in vogue: of mullets, pub rock and bad tap lager. Blundstones allow their middle class wearers to engage in cultural tourism: the aesthetics and culture of the working classes, without actually having to wear them to work. A new entrant to the Australian workwear market takes this behaviour

further- SUK, an “ethical” brand that sells working clothes at a Gorman price point, founded in 2018. Mimosa Schmidt, the brand’s founder, is a former labourer, lending the company an air of authenticity that would otherwise be lacking. With a supposed member of the working class at the helm, SUK is able to use identity politics as a shield. In fact, much of SUK’s image is shrouded in the kind of hollow social justice politics currently popular amongst liberal creative types. It advertises size inclusivity, despite admitting that its products run 1-2 sizes smaller than average. It’s “built on the ethos of celebrating all workers as worthy” despite the fact that few workers could afford even its lowest priced garments. SUK brands itself as ethical workwear, but its target market isn’t actual workers. People working the jobs that SUK purports to make clothes for- waitresses, labourers, and factory workers- are unlikely to afford such frivolities as a fashionable “workers bib” for $80. Most of the garments sold by SUK are available in some form from other manufacturers, such as King Gee, for half the price. Aware of this contradiction, the brand is careful to use working imagery

in its advertising. A video advertisement published across social media shows models working in various settings, and though some are working in their actual work environments, most are popular Melbourne instagram creatives playing dress-up. This is what makes SUK such a compelling case study for class appropriation. In play-acting at being working class, the branding of SUK is mirroring the daily behaviours of its true target audience: hip middle class professionals and creatives, blithely unaware of the reality of life for people who wear such clothes for work, not fashion. It’s not necessarily “problematic” to wear a $180 boiler suit, but it is interesting to interrogate the meaning of wearing such an item for leisure, especially when the wearer doesn’t engage in the kind of work that requires it. In practical terms, such a meaning is decidedly sinister: as the clothes become more fashionable, those that wear them for work are priced out. As unsafe working environments lead to injury and death, as our media class advocate for a reduction in hospitality wages, and as our government attempts to introduce new union-busting laws, yuppies continue to play at being poor.

7

ANALYSIS

No capitalist cure: Factory farming and foregone futures Himath Siriniwasa on capitalist food production and the impending public health crises. The mass hysteria that followed the outbreak of the 2019 novel coronavirus has been met with scepticism and disdain by those in progressive circles. These critics contend that the response to the epidemic has been Sinophobic and orientalist, drawing on Yellow Peril narratives of East Asians as carriers of disease. This legacy has its origins in the colonial conscription of indentured labourers from China who, during industrialisation in the United States, were exploited in the garment and railroad industries. These unhygienic working conditions were ripe for disease, and following outbreaks, Chinese communities were ostracised. Notably, the environmental causes of illnesses were ignored and the outbreak racialised — Chinese immigrants were seen as disease ridden due to inferior racial make-up. In an article published by Slate, Jane Hu argues that this stereotype remains pervasive in discourse on the Wuhan virus whereby “the Chinese brought the disease upon themselves by eating the ‘weird’ animals where the virus originated.” As news of the outbreak spread, a viral video of a young woman eating a bat with chopsticks was promoted by media outlets like the Daily Mail and RT as the ‘cause’ of the Wuhan virus. Contrasting the resulting uproar on Twitter deriding Chinese eating habits to reality provides ample confirmation for Hu’s argument — the video wasn’t set in Wuhan, or China, but rather in the Pacific Island nation of Palau. While Hu’s article successfully interrogates the racialised narratives that emerged following the outbreak, it has two key limitations. Firstly, it ignores the enormous public health risks posed by commonplace industrial food production in the West. Secondly, in trying to counter Sinophobic rhetoric, this enormous risk is obscured by the author’s misguided attempt to sever the link between meat production and the outbreak, implicitly characterising the epidemic as a highly contingent

8

phenomenon. As evolutionary ecologist Rob Wallace argues in his book Big Farms Make Big Flu, these structural factors cannot be ignored. Not only do capitalist relations of production engender the likelihood of a pandemic, in its current form, they make this threat practically inevitable. This makes orientalist narratives of ‘exotic’ meat consumption being the sole cause of the outbreak particularly sinister as it obfuscates and racialises the destructive potential of ‘mundane,’ Westernised production. An open letter to the World Health Organisation (WHO) signed by nearly 300 public health experts outlined the countless ways that industrial meat production could be the perfect breeding ground for the next global pandemic. Factory farming - the dominant form of industrial meat production - refers to the large-scale enclosure of animals to mass-produce meat as efficiently as possible. As humans became more

the health of the global population and a sustainable future for the planet on the other. Corporate agribusiness primarily consists of a handful of state-backed monopolies; 75% of world poultry production is carried out by a handful of multinationals, with this number decreasing. In 1989, 11 companies controlled the breeder’s market for broiler chickens while in 2006 this number came down to 4. These multinationals perfectly understand the potential of a dangerous pathogen emerging from food production. However, they externalise these costs onto contract farm workers, who often have little to no insurance and require government subsidies to recover from the extreme economic burden a viral outbreak can place. In 2016, the New York Times (NYT) reported that an outbreak of avian flu cost up to $2.6 billion dollars in expected earnings, $400 million in foregone taxes and up to 16,000 jobs. If it weren’t for the minimal

When confronted with the self-destructive impulses of the system that their power rests upon, all they can do is shift the blame to a foreign bogeyman. prone to deadly outbreaks of pathogens as they congregate tightly in unsanitary cities, factory farms have urbanised animal populations that were previously distributed in small holdings across small-scale farms. Additionally, the increased risk of disease by large populations of animals in close proximity, as well as the added stress of constant exposure to faecal matter, ammonia and other gases arising from this matter make these creatures far more susceptible to infections. These infections can be, and often are, viral — but factory farming also engenders the threat of antibiotic resistant super-bacteria. Currently, this threat kills 700,000 people a year, with this number expected to rise to 9.5 million by 2050. In the United States (US) and European Union (EU), 75% of antibiotics are used in agriculture, often dangerously and in violation of minimal regulations. Animals are given antibiotics routinely in small doses, a practice that is ineffective in preventing disease, but very likely increases the risk of producing bacteria resistant to treatment. Moreover, since factory farms systematically dump animal waste into local waterways, antibiotic resistant bacteria efficiently spreads into the populated areas. It would be incorrect to regard this issue as a trade-off between public health and attempts by food producers to efficiently meet the demands of a meatseeking global population. Rather, it is better characterised as a struggle between a handful of autocratic corporations on one side, and their exploited workers,

government intervention that occured — requiring farmers to slaughter their poultry en masse — the NYT projected that it could have cost up to $40 billion dollars. Economic cost aside, low-income contract farmers and exploited factory workers are at extreme risk of infection. A 2007 study in Iowa highlighted that rural residents exposed to pigs were 55 times more likely than non-exposed individuals to have contact with the Swine flu. Moreover, these labourers, often from marginalised racial backgrounds, suffer under inhumane working conditions. For example, in 2016, Oxfam revealed that poultry workers at major American corporations were forced to wear diapers while working as they were denied bathroom breaks. The threat of human-animal interaction promulgating a global catastrophe cannot be understated; a 2017 research study by the University of New South Wales highlights that of the 19 influenza strains that have infected humans in the last 100 years, 7 had occurred in the 5 years preceding it, with this rate increasing. The neoliberal mantra is in full swing; socialise the economic burden of ‘free’ enterprise to the taxpayer, privatise the rewards, and externalise the risk of catastrophe to the global population. As in the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, the environmental causes of disease — state-subsidised corporate greed and poor working conditions — are ignored, and the resulting outbreaks are racialised. Having understood that overt Yellow Peril narratives are too

obviously racist for their ‘woke’ readerbase, outlets such as Bloomberg Media in their article ‘Chinese Food Will Determine the Spread of Pandemics’ have opted for red-baiting and Orientalist characterisations of the CCP as foreign despots. Yet these attacks ring hollow when comparing industrial meat production in the West to China. While 95% of EU and US meat production is done via factory farming, 44% of livestock in China in 2010 was still raised traditionally. Furthermore, given that the American health care system has reportedly been discouraging many possibly infected people from seeking medical attention due to financial burden, the idea that ‘Chinese Food’ rather than McDonalds™ has a greater likelihood of determining the spread of pandemics exposes the ideological entrapments of the Western media class. When confronted with the selfdestructive impulses of the system that their power rests upon, all they can do is shift the blame to a foreign boogeyman. Moral considerations aside, the threats caused by industrial meat production cast a dark shadow over the possibility of a thriving, future human population. Like climate change, the dominance of its economic actors in the state-corporate complex seeks to limit the possibilities of our actions. We are consumers in the economic world and spectators in the political — if we want to change the world, we are told to change our consumption and the spectacle. To foster the possibility for political action, we must shift our attention from patterns of consumption to the relations of production and the system that reproduces them.

Art by Ranuka Tandan.

OPINION

Our last best chance: Bernie Sanders and the Democrats Abroad Primary Dr Thomas J Adams makes the case to Americans on campus to vote for Bernie. As an American historian and citizen working at the University of Sydney I often get asked by Australian media to comment on U.S. politics. This is especially the case regarding the presidential candidacy of Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders who I have written about academically, covered journalistically, and supported through my own volunteering since he ran for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2016. The most common question I get asked about Senator Sanders is, why is a 78-year-old so overwhelmingly popular with younger people? The answer is simple. Younger people in the U.S. disproportionately fall into the class of people rocked by tens of thousands of dollars in student debt. Younger people in the U.S. are chronically unable to afford quality health care in a system in which health care is delivered for profit and not as a citizenship right. Like in Australia, younger people in the U.S. are plagued by skyrocketing rents and decreasing hope of owning a house or

apartment. Like in Australia, younger people are entering a labour market beset by stagnating wages, declining workplace rights, and the growing likelihood that they will cycle through dozens of jobs and multiple careers in their lifetimes. And like in Australia and all around the world, it is younger people who will inherit the devastation born of tepid action on climate change after it is far too late to meaningfully reverse course. Younger people around the world are not exhibiting some kind of generational politics born of youthful idealism in their overwhelming support for Senator Sanders. They’re demonstrating their cohesiveness as a distinct class of citizens with particular material and ethical interests vis-à-vis an American, Australian, and global political and economic elite that benefit from the upward redistribution of wealth, the privatisation of public goods, and who are relatively well-insulated from the realities of climate change. I was in Iowa recently to write about

Can I vote? Yes! If: 1. 2. 3. 4.

You’re 18, or will turn 18 by November 8; You’re an American citizen living abroad; You haven’t voted in another state primary yet; and You are registered to vote (if you’re not, no worries, you can register online at: democratsabroad.org/join

How do I vote for Bernie?

1. Vote online from March 3–10 at democratsabroad/primary; or 2. Vote in-person from 11am to 4pm on March 7 at the Palace Hotel on George Street.

the campaign for the ABC and it was striking how much this summer’s fires in Australia have become a point of emphasis for voters and Senator Sanders. The U.S. has the highest per capita carbon emissions of major countries in the world and is second to China in overall emissions. Sanders’ “Green New Deal” foregrounds the trade union principle of a real “just transition” for the hundreds of thousands who depend on jobs in the fossil fuel industry. It proposes the complete renewability of transportation and electricity in the U.S. by 2030 and the total decarbonisation of the U.S. economy by 2050. Given the U.S. role in global emissions, these plans alone would do wonders to stem the tide of climate change. But Senator Sanders does not stop there. He frequently talks about being the “organiser in chief,” not just in reference to labour unions in the U.S. but also regarding global grassroots action on climate change. His is the politics of climate strikes and massmobilisations of voting blocs around the world to counter those who profit from a carbon economy and the politicians their money buys. Indeed, if you think the elite brokerage politics of Paris and Davos can get us to where we need to go on climate change, then as the saying goes, I’ve got a bridge to sell you in Sydney Harbour. In this regard and given the enormous global power of the American presidency, the election of Senator Sanders represents what may be the world’s last best hope to curtail the worst of social and environmental climate catastrophe. Luckily, even from Sydney, there are ways students and staff can support this last, best hope. With easy online registration and voting available from March 3-10 at http://democratsabroad. org/primary as well as an in-person voting from 11 am to 4 pm at the Sydney’s Palace Hotel on George St. on March 7, U.S. Citizens abroad have the opportunity to disproportionately play a role in the victory of Bernie Sanders. Disproportionately because

Democrats Abroad (D.A.) will be awarded thirteen delegates to the party’s National Convention in 2020 where it will take a minimum of 1,991 delegates to secure the nomination. In the 2016 race, less than 2,000 votes in the D.A. primary was enough to earn a candidate a delegate whereas in most American states it took around 10,000 votes. Thus, voting in the D.A. primary—with its ease of online, same day registration and voting—has the added benefit of meaning your vote or the vote of the American exchange student sitting next to you in your lecture has exponentially more value than say, my primary vote this year in Louisiana. Indeed, between exchange students, dual citizens, and their friends and family in Sydney, it’s likely there are enough U.S. citizens on or near this campus to make a real difference in this election. Bernie Sanders campaign slogan is “Not Me. Us.” That “us” refers to all of us around the world. Not just those of us who can vote in the U.S., but those who can’t as well. You can phone and text-bank from abroad on behalf of the campaign as hundreds do via Australians Supporting Bernie Sanders. And we can talk to our friends, classmates, and coworkers who can vote and urge them to cast their ballot in the D.A. primary. As Senator Sanders emphasises repeatedly on the campaign trail, this past summer’s events in Australia are a vivid reminder that sitting on the sideline is no longer an option. To beat back the politics of inaction on climate change, it truly will take all of us. Dr. Thomas J. Adams is Senior Lecturer in History and American Studies in the School of Philosophical and Historical Inquiry. On leave during Semester 1, he will be teaching HSTY 2712: From Lincoln to Trump, a unit on the history of American (in)equality in Semester 2.

Art by Shrawani Bhattarai.

9

PERSPECTIVE

Why collectives shouldn’t be autonomous Nina Dillon Britton wants men in the Wom*n’s Collective. The University of Sydney Students’ Representative Council convenes a number of different “collectives”, activist organising spaces centred on particular issues. Though some of these are open to anyone of any identity, such as the Environment Collective or the Education Action Group, others are “autonomous”, only allowing membership for particular identities. They are namely, the Wom*n’s Collective (WoCo), the Autonomous Collective Against Racism, the Queer Action Collective (QuAC), the International Students’ Collective, the Indigenous Collective and the Disabilities Collective. I think that autonomy should be scrapped. This argument hinges on a specific vision of collectives as the primary organising spaces for feminist, antiqueerphobia, anti-racist, Indigenous or disability-rights movements on campus. That’s because collectives are affiliated to the SRC, which is an activist union, because this has been the historic purpose and because, for many of them, it’s literally in their name (e.g. Queer Action Collective, Autonomous Collective Against Racism). But even if it weren’t the case, I’d argue it should be: there are alternative spaces for a-political identity-based socialising (like clubs) and it’d be an affront to the activist history of these groups to transform them into social groups (compare the networking-minded “USyd Women” group to WoCo). I’d also like to specify the modesty of my argument in two ways. First, this isn’t an argument against autonomous spaces or “safe spaces” generally: one could easily continue, for example, to have the campus Queer Space exclude cis-gendered straight people while making anyone welcome in the Queer Action Collective. Second, this is not an argument against “identity politics” (too nebulous a term to even define here) or identity-based socialising generally. So, what are the arguments for autonomous collectives? As I see them, they are the following: first, that people who belong to a particular oppressed identity group have a greater stake in fighting for the interests and rights of that group. Second, that it is important that this activism excludes other people because they don’t have the lived experience to truly understand or have a stake in these struggles. Third, if included in these spaces, currently excluded people – men, non-Indigenous people, white people, straight cis-gender people or domestic students – might, at worst, dominate in ways harmful for other members and for the broader struggle, or at best, require other members to perform the “labour” of explaining their experiences to them. One could agree with the premise of the first and second arguments without agreeing with autonomy itself. It seems to me instead, that collectives should require members to respect

10

the experiences and accompanying knowledge of people of the relevant identity and understand they should, in almost all instances, lead these struggles. The rise of identity politics in contemporary left-wing organising has meant that I think activists would be adequately deferential, and where they were not, would be a minority that would wield little power in the collective. Much of off-campus refugee organising, for example, is already open to people of any background, but often defers to refugee leadership and direction in organising. If you accept that, then you also have to recognise that the likelihood of these spaces becoming “unsafe” were their membership open, is small. I’m also sceptical of the objection, then, that members would be unfairly saddled with the burden of

could be a condition of entry into WoCo, for example. Fourth, because everyone has multiple types of identities, this sort of thing happens already. Women of colour in WoCo, for example, have had to deliver this sort of education to white women. The conclusion thus far hasn’t been that we should make hundreds of small collectives catered to specific intersections of identities. Fourth, other types of educating and persuading occurs in collectives all the time – not all members of WoCo always object to the existence of colleges, not all members of QuAC believe we shouldn’t have corporate sponsors in Mardi Gras – but these collectives continue to function and organise across political cleavages. Given that, I think autonomy poses several problems for collectives. First, and most obviously, it shrinks

educating these new additions of their experiences, for a few reasons. First, I just do think that it is the role of an activist is to educate people, to build movements and to explain the ways in which your struggle may not be too different from their own. Others have far more eloquently noted the troubling neoliberal development that frames simple things like explaining some type oppression as labour requiring remuneration. Second, this is a very different form of education than trying to convince the average punter of your goals. For example, men entering the Women’s Collective, presumably, would already be feminists, likely open to education on the finer points of rape culture or subtle forms of misogyny. Third, collectives could retain the discretion they already exercise over people joining, to prevent stacking or influxes of trolls. That someone, regardless of gender, has feminist politics and has attended feminist rallies

the pool of people who are able to be part of movements. That of itself is a problem for activism which seeks to build mass movements based on solidarity between peoples oppressed on the basis of class, gender, sexual orientation or race. But collectives face the additional difficulty of a very small membership pool: people of the particular identity group, who are politically active and engaged, who have heard of the existence of said collective (most students, I suspect, haven’t heard of collectives at all) and whose work, classes or other responsibilities does not coincide with the collective’s weekly meeting time. Note that, for some collectives, the pool is even smaller: the best estimates mean that only about 10% of students on campus are queer, and Indigenous students at USyd, on some accounts, remain in the doubledigits. Where membership is already small, it becomes difficult for collectives to

sustain themselves. Too few people are members to promote the collective’s existence to new students, and as existing members graduate, they disappear. At the moment, for example, the Indigenous Collective at USyd does not functionally exist, meaning an important basis for student organising has disappeared. Moreover, it just means there are less people to do the unglamorous behind the scenes work of political activism. Even for the largest collectives, the number of people turning up to rallies, banner paints and reading groups is incredibly small. It’s unclear to me why one would want to make that even smaller. Second, many activists already recognise the limitations of autonomous organising, and do organise inclusively: I’ve accompanied men on WoCo poster runs, and last Wednesday’s travel ban protest was organised by domestic and international students. Where this is already happening, the relevance of collectives is undermined. Third, it removes one barrier to the involvement of privileged groups in these movements. Activists will often argue that the burden to create change should not be placed solely on the oppressed, so it seems odd others are excluded from spaces they can actively join this fight. Fourth, autonomous collectives create the intractable problem of defining who should be part of these spaces. I struggle to see how whether asexual people are “queer” or if Ashkenazi Jews are oppressed by white supremacy is directly relevant to the work at hand of fighting against queerphobia or white supremacy. Though some of these arguments are worthwhile, most are unproductive, reflecting the problem of basing membership on nebulous social concepts whose meanings have changed over time and context, many of which were invented to justify the otherisation and oppression of groups of people. What might a non-autonomous collective look like then? Choosing leadership could, and I think should, remain in the hands of members of the relevant identity group. Meetings could also be structured such that planning and goals are led by that group, perhaps involving autonomous caucusing before meetings beginning, or where only people of that identity could speak for a short period at the beginning of meetings. In many cases, I doubt they would be very different at all: I would be surprised if white people suddenly overcame their indifference en masse to anti-racist struggles and comprised most of ACAR’s membership. For most collectives it would mean a few more hands on deck, more people promoting these collectives. For groups focused on enacting change on-campus, that small difference can mean a lot. Photograph : Financial Times

FEATURE

Manning, I love you For decades, Manning Bar was the heart of student life at Sydney University. We asked the students who loved it to say their farewells. Edited by Nina Dillon Britton

Andrew Hansen: Comedian, The Chaser Since the announcement of Manning Bar closing its day trading, I’m hearing many stories of triumphant theatrical successes that left Manning audiences hollering in delight. But my abiding memory of Manning is quite the opposite. What I recall is the astonishing series of failed stand-up comedy routines I was subjected to there in the ‘90s. The Manning management (the Manningment?) launched a lunchtime program called ‘Five Minute Noodles’, where aspiring student comics could attempt a tight five at the mic to see how it flew. I recall one poor student whose routine was so poorly received, he started to gush with sweat. It came like a Biblical flood erupting from his head. But bless him, he forged on to the sweaty end of his five precious minutes regardless. The stage then had to be mopped. “Five Minute Noodles” was also the first time I laid eyes on Chas Licciardello, who would later become a dear friend and colleague and nuisance. Unfortunately for those of us in the audience, Chas decided against sticking to the five-minute rule, instead preferring a slightly longer stand-up routine – namely, fifty-five minutes. Every one of them hell. That’s as long as a standard comedy festival show, but it felt as long as a standard comedy festival. Mind you, it was tough going only for the audience. Chas seemed to be having the time of his life. The other thing that struck me was that for reasons known only to him, and which never became apparent during the routine, he performed the entire thing wearing a sombrero. Which is why I assumed he was Mexican for about the first eight years I knew him. I can’t help wondering if part of the reason you now get cancelled for wearing a sombrero at a university is because it reminds everyone of Chas’s routine. But the most catastrophic failure was mine. My confidence unreasonably bolstered by a fairly warmly received Arts Revue that year, I decided to treat Manning Bar to my very own tight five. Only I’d never written a tight five before, or even a tight one. I provided a true though embellished story of being unable to find a toilet at a party. My clueless efforts were justly met with quiet horror, even by the Manning Bar crowd who at that time offered Christlike levels of forgiveness to weak performances. To mine, they offered Christ-like levels of crucifixion. And fair enough, too, as it was a lazy and dismal piece. It culminated in me describing how I used a rotating lawn sprinkler to wash my arse, circling around the stage doubled over and spreading my cheeks to my silent and dismayed peers. It was so bad, I submitted a written public apology to that week’s Honi Soit. On the upside, the experience taught me to swear off stand-up forever, which is why I remain a songs-andsketches comedian to this very day. I can’t help suspecting the eventual closure of Manning Bar’s daytime trading may well be traceable back to these dire performances. If so, please consider this my second public apology in Honi Soit.

Amanda LeMay (1995-6): SRC Publications Officer This is the wedding of Kirsti and Davis Claymore. Davis played in one of the finalist bands of the 1992 Sydney Uni Band comp. Front End Loader along with Frenzel Rhomb. Neither won, except Davis won the bride. The cool kids of the early 90s Sydney indie rock scene were all in attendance. It was a lovely venue and we all definitely felt at home!

David Killick, Editor of Honi Soit, 1992, at Manning in 1987.

Andrew Hansen’s first apology in Honi Soit (1995).

Nathan Tyler: Manning Bar Manager in the early 2000s Sad news that Manning Bar is to be no more. It really was the central hub of the campus from when the doors opened at midday. So many memories. Some of the most wonderful people I have met and known were a direct result from Manning Bar. The “staffies” were awesome. We worked hard(ish) and played hard. We would pack up the bar after a gig and watch the sun come up from the balcony, drinking beer. The bar staff were all such good friends - we worked together and played together. A lot of the crew I used to work with are still really good mates 15/20 years after they worked at Manning. There are four children I know of as a result of staff meeting their partners at Manning. Mikey and Amy both met there as bar staff a few years before that and they have a daughter now. My wife Skye and I met there 15 years ago and we have three children.

Anthony Albanese (early 1980s) - Leader of the Australian Labor Party, former rabble rouser Manning Bar was the scene of Informals, band nights (including Mental As Anything, The Allniters, and Died Pretty) and was a great place for lunch or a beer. What the hell is going on at Sydney Uni when bars are shutting?! It is beyond my comprehension how closing down bars at a university cannot be an ongoing concern. Cheers for the memories!

11

FEATURE Sam Crosby (2001-5): President Sydney University Union, former Labor MP candidate Manning Bar was the canvas on which friendships and careers were painted. During the few years I spent there 2001-2005, comedians like Ed Kavalee and Jordan Raskopoulos kept audiences in stitches of laughter as they honed their craft during weekly theatre sports tournaments. Debaters, public speakers, and budding politicians came to hear then IR minister Tony Abbott debate the likes of firebrand union secretary Doug Cameron or Julia Gillard. Fuelled by large quantities of ice cold beer, the raucous gatherings were loud, but happy. During the day, the Manning Bar balcony, shadowed by a large jacaranda tree overlooking sandstone edifices gave students the quintessential Sydney University experience. A friend could always be found, or a new friend made, as students squeezed in a drink and a chat in between – or sometimes instead of – classes. Student politicians would accost unwitting first years - unfamiliar with student elections. (Second years were older and knew better.) The earnest aspirant would learn the craft of persuasion and how to connect with voters. A healthy proportion of politicians who now make up both the NSW and federal parliaments learned their craft in that bar. Musicians would do their bit in helping populate the balcony as they too worked on their art, driving potential audience members outside. But amidst the cacophony, occasionally genius struck. You were reminded that this was the place The Whitlams developed their skills only a few years before. Long debates were had. Philosophy or politics or art or economics or whatever. This is what sticks. The facts gathered in the libraries and lecture halls generally fade, but the friendships forged in that bar endure. Caleb Cluff (1984-9): Journalist I was part of a push of students in 1983-84 which included some brilliant people: Matt Ford (Pinky Beecroft) and Tim Freedman were among them. Matt realised Union funds were available to formally organised clubs and so formed The Love Club, to gain finances for libations. There were the band comps, in which my band Darlings of the Press competed and were promptly disqualified for having certain members of well known Sydney bands appear on stage with us. Ensuing

Sketch of Manning Bar in Honi Soit (1992).

uproar saw the night finish with all the members of competing bands that night get on stage to play “You Can’t Always Get What You Want.” There was another night where about 50 guitarists got on stage Concrete Blonde played a gig there. It was so dangerously full Johnette Napolitano stopped the show. I was down the front and it was surging so much my glasses and cap came off and she stopped playing until they were returned. The Wimmin’s Collective would meet on the top floor. I learnt so much about how the world actually worked from some of those wimmin. Diane Dadich and others. It was a great place, and always full. Jason Monios (1994-2001) Ode to Manning Bar O Manning Bar, student bar, student union. You were my youth, my childhood dreams of studenthood, self-righteous wankery that gentled me towards adulthood, schoonered me across the sea of peer groups and sobriety. First they tore you down, ripe for renovation: sanded your edges, cramped your spiky style, the best graffiti in the southern hemisphere taken. Then they broke the student union. A place to congregate, you had lost your congregation. The synapse never bridged, no leap from the lion’s mouth across the corporation’s scaly neck. The character of a nation’s youth middle-manned, Howardised.

Students on the Manning Balcony, 1988. University archives.

Gig economy students broken by debt will never know your endless afternoons. You were always more than a beer-soaked carpet, more than a student bar. You were my union of students.

Peter McGrath SC Manning Bar was a bit like Switzerland but much more fun, a centrally located lunchtime oasis of bad sandwiches, worse coffee and alcohol in which the various university faculties and tribes sought alcoholic refuge in unarmed neutrality...or maybe more like the last African waterhole in a drought. Many an afternoon lecture was missed, or at least misunderstood. The music was a highlight. All free. Vague memories of Ann Kirkpatrick playing in the corner while no one noticed. A Friday evening residency by a band called Terminal Twist. One standout end of term party where Flowers covered every glam rock tune of the entire seventies and we all danced on the tables Over forty years after I left campus my daughter took me back to see a gig by the Smith Street Band. A big production, unrecognisable from the simple seventies. Not worse, just different. Fisher Library still smelt the same though!

12

David Smith: Lecturer, Department Government and International Relations I remember Bob Ellis giving a talk there one lunchtime back in early 2001. He was so drunk he could hardly stand and he opted to read us an article he’d just written for GQ. In the Q&A he predicted the imminent end of the Liberal and National parties (they went on to win the election a few months later). The crowd found him boring and incoherent but were keen to get him to do some of his famous rabble-rousing. Someone asked him what he thought of proposals to cut funding to the arts. He said the people responsible were like the Nazis. Cheers from the crowd. That they were like the perpetrators of genocide in Bosnia. More cheers. Then he thundered “THEY ARE JUST LIKE THE PEOPLE WHO TOOK ABORIGINAL CHILDREN AWAY FROM THEIR PARENTS!” Dead silence. He mumbled something about denying human potential and wandered off. Rebecca de Unamuno (1993-8): Comedian, actress, theatre sports legend This news makes me really sad. Manning Bar was where I performed stand-up and Theatresports for the very first time It was playing trivia, watching Corky and the Juice Pigs and other amazing comedians at Tuesday lunchtimes, rehearsing big dance numbers for revues, watching Battle of the Bands, eating $2 chips and gravy, collecting empty glasses for 20c until you had enough money for a schooner. It was where student election results were announced, SUDS mail-outs were collated. Where romances began and ended and where life-long friendships were made. I owe so much, including my career, to Manning Bar. Anne Britton (1977-81): SRC councillor, Sydney University Senate Fellow, Nina’s mum Yeah there were the “big events” – the bands, stand-up comedy, the parties — and as widely reported, they were fabulous — but my fondest memories of Manning Bar was simply hanging out, between and often during classes. There was a never a shortage of friends and acquaintances with whom to waste what now seems like an obscene amount of time discussing (and pretending to understand) literature, the meaning of life, the internecine struggles of student politics, and the latest outrage perpetrated by the Spartacist League who once labelled me in their weekly newspaper as a ”bilious bourgeois reformist with less morals than Trotsky’s assassin”. For me, those salad days were to end when I moved to finish the final years of my degree at the unlamented Phillip Street Law School, a miserable light-deprived building in the Brutalist style. Young people are now criticised for wasting time on social media. They come a very poor second to my generation of students. Vale Manning! Rob Carlton: Comedian, theatre sports host My most potent memory of Manning Bar was the Theatre Sports finale in 2001, that was set to occur the night after 9/11. Theatre sports at that time was always sold out, everyone had been really looking forward to it. But we’d woken up to this horrible story, so it was difficult to imagine going through with it. We arrived at uni, and were thinking of calling it off. But I thought of Manning’s history. It’s a gathering place for students, regardless of race, or political or cultural background. It’s a unique notion to be a student, and Manning is the perfect place to be and gather, to grieve and find joy together. So we went through with the show. I opened the show differently, it was a quite sbre beginning. The whole place was quiet, not knowing what was going to happen. And I’d acknowledged what had happened, what a terrifying moment that was for the world, how dark it seemed. And then we went on with the show, to have one of the most joyful performances I’d seen.

Charles Firth: Comedian, The Chaser

Firth, Julia Gillard and Jane Caro at Manning Bar in 2015.

Verity Firth (1992-8): Former Labor MLC I remember being swept off my feet (literally) by Robbie Carlton as we stormed our way to the Theatresports finals in ‘93. Gabbi Milgate of “you’re terrible Muriel” fame was also in our team. I first met the Sydney University Labor Club on the balcony of Manning Bar. We were all reclining on the balcony after the results of the Honi Soit election. I was in the winning team - a “trot” ticket - and we had beaten the ‘Labor Left’ ticket of the day. That team was headed up by John Graham, now in the NSW Upper House. Although I was part of the winning team I remember being intrigued by the Labor Left team. Later that year I joined the Labor Club and entered the life of student politics. I remember doing university debates at Manning, drinking far too much when I should have been at lectures, and seeing I don’t know how many performances of “Puppetry of the Penis” - a show that seemed to have a semi-permanent Manning Bar booking. Once an adult, I returned to Manning Bar in 2015 to host a ‘conversation with Julia Gillard’ - once again the bar was packed. It had barely changed in 20 years. It was like coming home. Manning Bar is an icon of Sydney University life. I can’t believe it’s going. Vale Manning Bar.

Band Comp Candids, Honi Soit (1987).

Charles Firth at Manning Bar, from the iconic documentary Uni (1997).

“A fucking cup of chips could run the SRC better than Sholto!” Andrew Hansen comforts Firth after an election loss on the Manning balcony, from Uni (1997).

Victoria Zerbst - Editor of Honi Soit (2016); Comedian, The Feed Manning Bar was everything to me. My first ever date with a uni guy was at Manning Bar. That year (2014) I also played Schapelle Corby in Schapelle! The Musical on the Manning Stage. The musical also starred Alisha Aiken-Radburn as Renee Lawrence and featured legend journos Lane Sainty and Astha Rajvanshi in their stage debuts. I spent a week in 2015 writing sketch comedy from 8am-11am in Manning Bar for the Great Engo Revue of 2015 - Engo Aid. In 2016 I went to Manning Bar to watch the results of the US election (the pics made the SMH). That year I also pissed my pants with joy watching my best friend get elected to board (Count on Courtney!) In 2017, Mary Ward (now at SMH) and I hosted Hack Revue, an ICONIC display of tragic hack sketch comedy for the USU election results. It featured an absolute banger about Cameron Caccamo sung to the song “Say Geronimo!” by Sheppard. I ate so many chips there. Drank so many beers. Watched too much theatresports and got loose at a couple of parties. Manning Bar was where I first wrote a sketch by myself for the first time. I sat by myself at a table with a beer in the middle of the day and pumped something out. I can’t remember what but it was definitely bad. I also recently found a performance studies essay I wrote about the USU Soap Box at Manning Bar in 2017. There is some analysis about the space and its relevance to student life. Weirdly the essay got an HD which makes me sad reading back because it’s mostly bullshit. very poor second to my generation of students. Vale Manning!

The first time my wife ever saw me, I was standing on a table in Manning Bar. It was about 10am and I was, for reasons I still don’t quite understand given my general lack of integrity, the chief adjudicator of the 1994 Easters Debating tournament. The trendy, hip event on campus. My wife claims I was dressed in a terrible flannie and a bit drunk. But - come on - it was 10am. Wasn’t everyone? I’ll be straight: my aim in writing this piece is to argue that Manning Bar added no value to the economy of Australia, nor did it benefit the careers of those who treaded its beer-drenched carpet. My aim is to strenuously argue that the countless hours I spent out on that balcony attempting to flirt with girls by impressing them with my knowledge of undergraduate-level feminist theory was a complete waste of time (it certainly felt like that at the time). And the cumulative days I spent trawling through that dank bar, lined with the tattered posters of famous bands who’d passed through there, searching for empty schooner glasses to return to the bar to collect the 20c deposit was also a waste of time. Joyous and crazy. But it was time off. (And it did allow me to buy one more beer for the onerous price of $2.20). And the weeks and months of time I spent on stage there at lunch, trying out stand up (“Five Minute Noodles”) and doing Theatresports, or crafting new and innovative ways to offend the trots in the next cabaret night, were not a net-positive to the Australian economic output. That was not its purpose. Its purpose was to provide a place to meet, pickup, and most importantly, play. When I first heard of the passing of Manning Bar, I found myself justifying my sadness in terms of its productive output. From a cultural perspective, it’s undeniable. Without Manning Bar, Tom Gleeson might not have won a gold logie. Sarah Kendall might not be pumping out high quality BBC narrative comedies. I might have ended up becoming the feminist theorist I was training to be. Worst of all, without Manning Bar, Andrew O’Keefe might not be Australia’s top rating game show host. Without Manning Bar, where will Australia get its game show hosts? The bar was always packed on Tuesdays. That was comedy day. My 11am lectures were inevitably across the other side of campus at Merewether, and so I had a mad dash at 12 to make to Manning Bar in time for the start of Theatresports or Five Minute Noodles or whatever the Union had dreamed up. I did consider switching degrees to Education, which was closer to the bar, but the Education Revue was always the worst, so I stuck with Arts. Tom Gleeson’s first standup performance at Five Minute Noodles was brilliant. He didn’t tell anyone what was about to unfold. He just told Adam Spencer (who was MCing) that Adam should just keep calling out “Malcolm? Malcolm?” to try and find the next act, the character Tom had dreamed up - a nerdy loser with a thick, ginger wig. Adam did this, looking as confused as he could, and then the audience heard someone in the toilets next to the stage “I’m coming, I’m coming” yelled the voice from the toilets. A few thumps and bangs and out of the toilet spilled “Malcolm” with his pants around his ankles, falling onto the stage in a mad scramble. At the time we thought it was groundbreaking work. Barry Humphries was nothing compared to this genius. In a slightly different category was Andrew Hansen’s first stand-up performance. It was a five minute performance so ahead of its time that it put him off doing stand-up for three decades. He opened with a guitar piece singing “Piano Man”. (I personally thought it was the single funniest thing I’d ever seen. The rest of the audience didn’t seem to have a funny bone that day.) I remember making it through to the Five Minute Noodle Finals one time, and I thought I was a shoo-in, at least for a place. I decided to seal the deal by launching into a highly distasteful and offensive bit about how someone should make a disaster movie about cleft lips. The audience enjoyed it. The judge, not so much. He had a cleft lip. In management theory, companies spend millions on consultants, getting them to tell them how to create moments of spontaneous, serendipitous collaboration between colleagues. That’s what Manning Bar created for free (as long as you collected enough empty glasses) At least it did, until 2012. After that, apparently its relevance faded, when smoking was banned, even on the balcony. My initial reaction hearing about the smoking ban was “so what?” There are plenty of substances that have been consumed in that bar over the years that were banned. But apparently it was quite strictly enforcedIt was evidence-based health and safety policy that brought Manning Bar down. Damn. Except. We all know it’s not what brought it down. There is no measure for what Manning Bar adds to Sydney University. Modern universities don’t count spontaneous, serendipitous collaboration of students on their spreadsheets. They don’t count play, or making mistakes or meeting the love of your life. Their models don’t take into account that wasting time is good simply because it’s fun. Instead, they count money. And, it would seem, only money. Just like the rest of the world. Damn.

Shapelle! The Musical, 2015.

13

CULTURE

The romantic perversion of the Muse Shania O’Brien considers the cultural impact of the muse through history. I always loved reading about what drove people to create art. More often than not, I have found, unsurprisingly, that the book, painting or sculpture I was looking at was created by a man for his lover. The muse, as a symbol of inspiration, has persisted for thousands of years, dating back to classical Greek mythology. It has evolved throughout history, its manifestations providing insight into the way different cultures understand creativity. American novelist Francine Prose notes that every historical period “re-creates the muse in its own image,” a physical analogy by which we can define abstract concepts that encapsulate the artistic process. The female muse continues to be a romanticised preoccupation in the present day, with artists continually walking the thin line between inspiration and objectification. Although modern and historical conceptions of the muse differ due to the discursive nature of the notion, I have found that the hierarchy of attribution remains the same. The muse is always secondary, their passive contributions credited to being vessels of divine authority granted unto the author/artist. This dichotomy has led to an unbridgeable chasm opening up between ‘artist’ and ‘not artist’, one that is too well established to rewrite. The duality between the two doesn’t allow for speculation into the complicated relationship between a creator and their creative inspiration. In addition to this, gendered notions are inherent in the ideology of artistic production. The muse is reduced to a speechless enchantment, the epitome of all objectified women in western art. A parallel to the Solitary Male Genius, the muse is always docile, always young, always naked. A prevalent victim of the muse/artist paradigm is Zelda Sayre, better known in popular culture as Zelda Fitzgerald. She was the living prototype of the American flapper, the artist’s wife, the quintessential muse, the doomed woman. Her identity is immersed in the public persona her husband curated for her. The Fitzgeralds lived in a time where codes of masculinity and femininity were more defined, where gender disparities were commonplace. It was a time where Fitzgerald adored, oppressed, and victimised his wife in the name of inspiration. He used her likeness and her life for his content, took material from her letters and diaries, and forbade her from doing the same. Zelda’s status as the muse prevented her from drawing on her personal and married life for inspiration in her own writing, with Fitzgerald deeming her work “third-rate” and her need to use her life for content an authorial weakness that stemmed from her inferior gender. She did not need to create art, he believed, because she was art. It doesn’t matter how well retellings

14

of Zelda’s life perform in the present day because the modernist ideology of the times in which the Fitzgeralds lived portrayed the professional creator as a nonpareil masculine storyteller, the defender of the arts against the feminine masses. Fitzgerald’s ideas of real art originated from a literary movement titled ‘High Modernism,’ a masculinist project intent on eradicating intellectual laziness and other forms of popularised culture codified as feminine. French sculptor Camille Claudel was the muse, lover, and model of Auguste Rodin. An accomplished artist herself,

when art schools would not accept female students. The picture and brief write-up accompanying it are amongst a small amount of readily available information about Claudel that doesn’t define her life in relation to Rodin’s or by her descent into madness. A new literary trend titled “muse lit” has recently been popularised by people who are adamant on righting historical wrongs. The genre aims to reclaim the forgotten portions of famous figures we thought we knew well, with multiple retellings and reimaginations following the lives of well-known muses such as

Claudel worked closely in Paris with female sculptors Jessie Lipscomb, Amy Singer, and Emily Fawcett to create bronze sculptures still admired today. There is a photograph of Claudel from 1899 wherein she is seen sculpting Perseus and the Gorgon. Claudel believed the piece to be a self-portrait, seeing herself in the severed head of the Gorgon. It’s thought to be a metaphor for her involvement with Rodin. Rodin, like Perseus, restricts her growth as an artist, as history paints the perpetrator as the hero, glorifying him for the basic act of enabling her artistic practice

Beatrice Portinari, Fanny Brawne, Ellen Ternan, and Maude Gonne. Such retellings distort the thin line between fact and fiction in biographical representation. The popularity of the genre proves that, despite their proliferation, we cannot quell our desire for more, for more works that offer better explanations of muses, of women, of concepts previously unexplainable. With these retellings come feminist perspectives that provide us with the benefit of hindsight; though we cannot forget that the original idea of the muse relies on the objectification

of women and their position in a gendered hierarchy. We look at these women from historical vantage points, observing the staging of power fantasies rather than the rendering of the history of creation. The problem, I think, is not the concept of the muse itself or its place in the history of the world, as problematic that in itself may be. The authors of “muse lit” cannot erase the power dynamics that have been the building blocks of our understanding of artistic creation and pseudo-accurate representation of gender across different historical periods. Merely putting the woman at the centre of the story and having it revolve around her, but this time where she has autonomous agency, does not fix all that has been wrong in the past. This is the curse of the female muse: they are doomed forever to be viewed through the prism of the men in their lives. We live in a time where women are capable of being great artists. Still, the history of art is littered with women upon whom the status of the muse has been bestowed, the word weighing them down to the depths of alcoholism and poor mental health. A 21st century hybrid of the concept can be found in the Manic Pixie Dream Girl trope. The ways women are oppressed in the present day are, by comparison, subtler. Film critic Nathan Rabin, the man who coined the term, originally meant for the phrase to refer to a fantastical woman who would play into the male fantasy of being saved from depression and ennui, disappearing immediately after he is whole again, only to be seen and heard from when she is required. Women are socialised to internalise the idea of being lesser than men, of being their saviours, their muses. They do not exercise ownership over their experiences, patriarchal storytelling practices reflecting real-life customs of lopsided power dynamics. The Manic Pixie Dream Girl is not only a trope, but every woman who has ever been told she has inspired third-rate poetry about heartbreak. We need to bury the figure of the muse in favour of a more honest understanding of the way women play a role in artistic creation. Being an artist does not have tow be, nor has it ever genuinely been, a solitary process. Human beings are always drawing on nuanced forms of inspiration from their surroundings, their lovers, their companions. There is no need for the naked woman with a satin sheet draped loosely around her, for the manic pixie dream girl, for the depressed artist’s wife. Creation should not have roots in oppression and suffering, but build on healthy relationships that view all human beings as equally capable of being great. Art by Kate Scott.

CULTURE

Moses Sumney and the digital crush Kiki Amberber explores intimacy in the age of internet isolation. Moses Sumney’s music is dizzyingly sensory. His new digital-only release græ: Part 1, the first half of his double sophomore album set to drop in full in May, is perhaps his most hypnotic yet. In its breadth of sonic layers - spanning warm jazzy strings to disembodied synth pads, threaded together by the artist’s falsetto croon the record expands and contracts like an elastic band that never quite allows the listener to catch their breath. Sumney’s body of work carries a cohesion despite its experimental nature; orbiting around a thematic core of love and isolation. This meditation on lovelessness and aloneness was first given its fullest expression on Sumney’s 2017 debut album Aromanticism. In an essay posted to his Tumblr page, Sumney described Aromanticism as “a concept album about lovelessness as a sonic dreamscape.” Though the sonic landscape in question is certainly dreamlike, woven together through layer upon layer of synthesised vocals, it is rarely happy. At its centre is a deeply personal exploration of Sumney’s experiences of aromanticism, and the doubt and suffering of failing to adhere to normative modes of love. The central track of the record ‘Doomed’ sees Moses question if a life lived without romantic love holds any meaning: “If lovelessness is godlessness / Will you cast me to the wayside? / Well, I feel the peeling of half-painted ceilings / Reveal the covering of a blank sky. græ: Part 1 is animated by the same troubling of Western capitalist society’s deep investment in romance as a completion of the self. However, where Aromanticism feels both intimate and emotionally distant, græ is larger, warmer, and more meditative. In græ, Sumney links a lack of romantic love to a politics of multiplicity; using the experimental nature of the record to explore the grey spaces that can exist within and between people. His album, in rejecting romantic love as the pinnacle of human interaction, opens a deep consideration of how practices of love can resist any one formation. I find Sumney’s record to collide with 2020s fast-moving digital culture in ways that are generative, bordering on hopeful. græ speaks to the internet era both in form and lyrics, spanning genre and atmosphere in ways that call to mind the networked chaos of digital space. The fact that græ: Part 1 has only been released on digital platforms only reinforces the distinctly internetage feel of the record; inhabiting a disembodied, liminal pocket of space and time. This sense of digital

spatiality also speaks to the transitory nature of Sumney’s own life - having lived between Ghana and the US as a child and young adult, and now geographically in flux as a musician creating a record that defies placement in the way that diasporic flows of bodies do. Nowhere is this clearer than on græ, whose first half opens with ‘insula,’ a brooding, synth- and stringheavy minute-long track punctuated by just four lines: “Isolation comes from ‘insula’ which means island,” three times, followed by “Here we go into the grey.” Borders of physical space become entangled with borders of emotional and bodily space. Sumney’s counter to this isolation, and the isolation of Aromanticism,

in love. Layered vocals of Sumney’s characteristic falsetto showcase the best songwriting on the record: “I want to be cotton candy / In the mouth of many a lover / Saccharine and slick technicolor / I’ll dissolve / I know that won’t solve this”. Ending abruptly as it does, the album eludes the feeling of completion. This space of disembodied incompleteness allows the album to carry Moses’ conceptual exploration of multiplicity into its sonic fabric. ‘In Bloom’ and ‘jill/jack’ are lighter, restrained tracks while ‘Virile’ and ‘Conveyor’ embody a frenetic energy that carries into the socio-political commentary of ‘boxes’. Even within tracks, græ refuses to ever sink into a single mode of listening.

expands slowly over the album as one of multiplicity. This thesis reaches its most resolute in the spoken word, “also also also and and and.” The track swells with building layers of unearthly sonic groans and pops, cut through by vocals from BritishAmerican-Ghanian-Nigerian author Taiye Selasi: “I insist upon my right to be multiple.” The following track ‘Neither/Nor’ takes this political statement and places it back alongside Sumney’s confessional songwriting. Over a winding folky-soul melody that dips in and out of quiet moments and a bouncy pop pulse, Sumney is at his most honest: “I fell in love with the in-between” and yet: “only the lonely are lukewarm.” græ: Part 1 ends with ‘Polly’, a minimal lament on feeling inadequate

Even as the experimental nature of Moses’ records speaks to digital space, it requires an attentiveness and slowness that feels incongruous with the fast-paced nature of the digital age. Listening to his music is, for me, a process of taking in the layered audio and only later allowing the weight of his lyrics to hit me. This commitment to attention is one helmed by Sumney himself: in the Aromanticism essay, he described the record as “not protest music, but process music”. græ holds this same intentionality, and Sumney’s insistence on multiplicity becomes a call to attend more deeply to complex conversations and ideas. In an essay for Real Life Mag, Alexandra Molotkov depicts the internet as a purveyor of romantic obsession; our devices allowing for the idealisation of another

to be continually reframed and bolstered, via a perpetual stream of blue-lit simulation. Love online, characterised by swipe-right Tinder culture and superficial interactions, doesn’t often account for nonnormative interactions - spaces of platonic intimacy, for example. Yet, Molotkov muses on the grey space to be found in the online: “The internet, while it can cocoon you in a fixation, can also help formalize distance. It legitimizes deep attention to others at a considerate remove.” Sumney’s music embraces this tension and in doing so, argues for a more considered approach to love and the lack of it in digital space. This opens space for a reframing of what kinds of love we prioritise in our internet interactions, and what kinds of communities can be forged out of the online. Art historian Temi Odemosu’s notion of a ‘politics of care’ elevates this practice of multiplicity in love to one with political potential. As part of her work with the Swedish Living Archives Research Project, Odemosu details the way that visual art - by developing a practice of ‘listening’ to archival content - can be a decolonising force. When such a politics of care is considered alongside Sumney’s work, his central concern of multiplicity in love points to slowness and an embrace of grey space online as politically salient. Under a politics of care, the tensions that arise within and around Sumney’s music are tools that, used in our online interactions, can be generative. Sumney’s rejection of societal labels and turn towards ‘the grey’ collides with the specificity of living in the world as a black man under systemic white supremacy. Such tensions open a space in which Sumney’s attentive approach to grey space in love offers cohesion and solutions for the other tensions to be found in the disconnected, yet hyperconnected digital age. Experimental audio, often incorporating multiple mediums of visual and text-based content, allows for reframing of the norm by moving beyond the parameters of what music can sound like. Artists like Kelsey Lu and serpentwithfeet use similarly genreless, vocal-heavy unearthly sound to explore themes of love and isolation. These kinds of sonic formations can help us to navigate the chaos of 2020s internet culture, pointing us towards non-normative, future-facing conceptualisations of what it means to love. Moses Sumney’s constructed sonic world is my new digital crush. Art by Ben Lopes.

15

PERSPECTIVE

Quomodo sola sedet civitas: Hong Kong

Words and art by Jocelin Chan

By the time I arrived in Hong Kong in late January, the pro-democracy movement that had begun in June 2019 was tapering off. After half a year of sustained anger and violence, even those who held the cause closest to their hearts were feeling the fatigue. The city bore aging scars of conflict: graffiti, out-of-order ticket machines, and a quieter “million scream” (a nightly event where people yelled protest slogans out of their windows). Lennon Walls—murals that collated pro-democracy Post-It notes and posters—were becoming sparse as pro-police crusaders tore them down with no one to put them back up.

Anti-government energy was far from fading. As an alternative to demonstrations, pro-democracy (“yellow”) Hongkongers participated in the “Yellow Economic Circle.” This scheme encouraged yellow consumers to boycott pro-police (“blue”) businesses and financially reward yellow ones for their politics. Shops would decorate their interiors with pro-democracy symbols and slogans to advertise their political leanings to attract yellow customers.

Pottinger Lane in Central is famed for its quaint upwards-twisting cobblestones; here, it is decked out in splendid red décor for New Year. I took this photograph on the Tuesday evening before New Year—the next morning, the Chinese government would finally admit after a month of denial that the novel coronavirus was transmissible between humans. With the seventeen-year-old spectre of SARS looming over the city and faith in the government at an all-time low, all of Hong Kong would start wearing face masks.

On the third day of New Year, my relatives and I went to Tai Mei Tuk and the adjoining Plover Cove Reservoir, an outdoor recreational area in Hong Kong. At the peak of the SARS outbreak in 2003, the government had encouraged residents to escape our tiny flats and venture outdoors to breathe in some fresh, germ-free air. Many of us had the same idea during this outbreak.

16

Lion dances are a popular New Year spectacle; the Southern style performed by Hong Kong’s lions is—in my biased opinion—particularly agile and beautiful. These lions tend to visit businesses and houses to “eat” lettuce for good luck and receive red packets. This year, I witnessed something rare: the qilin (麒麟, a mythical beast with a dragon’s head and deer-like body) dance. This type of dance is traditionally performed by Hakka ethnic minority communities.

Fai chun (揮春) are calligraphic decorations displayed on doorways during New Year. Most of them nowadays are mass-produced but when visiting the small fishing village of Tai O, we saw fai chun everywhere written in a beautiful, distinct hand. Upon further inquiry, we discovered that these were handwritten by a local sifu.

Staying jubilant amid the paranoia, my aunts tried out the see-saw in an empty playground. I had a go on the swing; it wasn’t not designed for adult legs. As a kid growing up in Hong Kong, the swing had always been my favourite play equipment—but because of coronavirus fears, the one in our estate had blocked off access until further notice.

Final day in Hong Kong. After a hike along the Insta-friendly Dragon’s Back trail, we ended up in this market in Shau Kei Wan. Wet markets in Asia have gained a bad reputation since the outbreak but they are a staple of everyday life here—and increasingly regulated in light of past outbreaks of avian flu and African Swine Fever.

17

PERSPECTIVE

Midnight in Kowloon: A recount from the Hong Kong Protests Josh Höhne reflects on his time as a tourist in the thick of the Hong Kong protest. Last November, I took a trip to Hong Kong to witness “the revolution of our time.” I became inspired by the sense of defiant righteousness that seemed to sweep the city, and as a history student, I felt an obligation to bear witness to an epochal moment. Throughout that semester, I studied China’s democratic heroes like Dr Sun Yat Sen, and consumed an endless media diet of live-streamed videos and activist groupchats. With the internet, I was able to gain vivid access to a mediated version of the protests, but I felt I needed to see the real thing. Combined with a real sense that it may be now or never, I booked a flight for the evening after my final exam. I arrived in Hong Kong late at night on the 18th of November 2019 and took the first train from the airport into the city centre. As soon as I stepped out of West Kowloon Station, I realised the answer to the question which had been plaguing me: "How bad can it be over there?" The nights of the 18th and 19th of November 2019 marked an attempt by the people of Hong Kong to distract their police force from a surrounded urban university campus. The events of November 2019 have become known as the Siege of Polytechnic University. They gained international attention due to dramatic, if anachronistic photos of Students wielding homebrewed bows and arrows. The situation had turned especially grim. Any student caught escaping the city's urban campus faced arrest and a ten-year prison sentence for charges of rioting. In sympathy with the trapped students of PolyU, the grassroots movement had planned large-scale marches to create a diversion. Tens of thousands had taken to the streets to challenge the police presence at the university, leading to some of the most open street conflict the city had ever seen. It was that night, hours after my final semester 2 exam, that I arrived in Hong Kong. Leaving the station, I crossed a pedestrian sky bridge passing over a highway. I was greeted with warm sweet air and the clamour of thousands of people. Something like the crowd’s buzz at a football match hung in the air. My plan was to ditch my pack and change clothes before heading out for the night. To reach my hostel further up the city’s peninsula, I would need only to walk a few blocks and change train lines. Glancing around, I saw a large group of people moving on a sky bridge running parallel to mine, perhaps a stone's throw away. I felt a rush of excitement. They

18

were walking in the direction I wanted to go. But as I turned to join the crowd, every warning bell and alarm in my head fired in unison. With almost subconscious, instinctive analysis you feel in a situation of danger, I registered that the people had stopped, and were now running back towards me. Trying to read the motion of a crowd can be difficult, but there is something unmistakable about people turning and scrambling for safety. What had been a solid mass of people passing over a street, turned instantly into two camps crouched at either end of a twentymeter stretch of bridge. Below on the street, two armored trucks had stopped just short of the bridge and disgorged a

the scene was still heaving with people. That night I saw an even ratio of regular civilians and "Hong Kongers" in allblack getups. These were the front-line agitators, who bore bats and full gas mask helmets, running in packs down the neon-lit streets. Chants intermingled with omnipresent sirens. I continued to make my way up the street, now against the flow of human traffic. It was surreal to be witnessing the kinds of images and conflict I had only seen in sanitized, digital form. When I got to the subway station I had been looking for, it was as if it had never existed. With metal shutters pulled down over every shopfront in the vicinity, the area that should have shown me Jordan MTR Station was a

squad of Hong Kong’s finest – suited and booted for combat. Two officers stood with tear gas launchers, aimed at the exposed section of the walkway just in front of me. The two groups at either end stood poised, waiting to see what would unfold. With no other obvious choice in front of me, I decided the only way through was forward, so I hoisted my pack and ran the exposed distance. I covered the stretch of bridge without looking back, and for the rest of that night, I remember feeling a singleminded determination just to keep going through the chaotic atmosphere. Arriving at street level, I got my first sense of the Hong Kong Protests. The highway I had just crossed over - devoid of cars - was filling up with a mass of protesters. The crowd formed a front against a flotilla of police and fire trucks. The flash of petrol bombs illuminated the semi-dark. The street’s terrain had been torn apart for the protesters gain: every single brick which formed the tessellating pattern of the sidewalks had been prized, crowbarred or kicked free. Once loose, each chunk was thrown onto the street to slow police vehicles. Streetlights were wrenched from the ground. The sidewalks and streets were an impassable mess of bricks, sand and twisted metal. Although it was around 11:30 pm,

scene of wreckage. The glass canopy that normally covered a descending staircase was shattered. The subway system was controversially closed early in the evenings and on weekends, bringing waves of accusations of collusion on the part of the operating company. I realised that instead of a quiet air-conditioned ride up the peninsula, I would be picking my way through debris on foot to my hostel. To gather my thoughts, I sat on the downed beam of an overhead traffic light. Two young guys in all black also sat along the crashed pole and when I asked, one kindly gave me a cotton surgical mask. The faint acrid tinge I could detect on the back my throat had been growing steadily, and I found myself blinking back tears from a residue of tear gas canisters, which would blow with the breeze. I began to make my way north along Nathan Road, the city’s main thoroughfare, keeping a careful eye on my footing. I dug through my bag and shifted my passport to the front pocket of my jeans. I came to an intersection just as a detachment of riot police arrived on foot. The twenty-odd officers interposed themselves between the crowd, blocking passage ahead with round riot shields and helmets. Most of the crowd stopped and began milling at the intersection,

but I decided to take a right and look for a route north parallel to Nathan Road. I followed a trickle of people, crowded underneath air-con units and restaurant back doors, to a dim alleyway next to the street. Suddenly, I became aware of sweat breaking out along my brow, accompanied by the taste of acid in my mouth and nose. The people around me began coughing violently, and spitting into the gutter – I felt compelled to do the same, as an invisible cloud of Dioxin Tear Gas funneled its way into the alleyway. We began to run, compelled to escape the alley into the clear air of the open streets. Tear gas stings your nervous system through the eyes and throat and skin, the burning effect of which is physically impossible to escape. My cotton mask was entirely useless. Weeping, but free from the alleyway, I looked to my left. Another squadron of police was blocking the northern end of the street I had just avoided, detaining whoever had been caught in the middle. This was no doubt the target of the tear gas rounds which spread collaterally to the alleys and side streets. Had I arrived at that block just minutes earlier, I would have been caught directly in the middle of the pincer maneuver. From those blocks, which I would later learn was the epicenter of the night's conflict, the way forward was safe. I was forced to take further detours due to police presence but thankfully stayed clear of tear gas. What should have been a twenty-five-minute walk took well over an hour. The big question in my mind going into Hong Kong had been how obvious would it be? To what extent was it a media fabrication, and life was still going on like normal. It's pretty obvious to me that there was no exaggeration. In my life, I’ve never seen anything like Kowloon that night. From the disruption of the trains, to the inescapable conversational topic, to the tactile upheaval of the literal ground underfoot, the protests were the demanding and overriding concern of the city. The unrest for the week peaked after that night, as protesters were urged to show restraint in the leadup to a local council election. After a landslide democratic victory, the marches immediately resumed, as passionate and determined as ever. The Hong Kong protests are still going; however, the mass gatherings have largely been suspended due to fears of public assembly at the height of the coronavirus outbreak.

MULTILINGUAL

学生代表要求取消 Bettina Arndt 澳大利亚骑士团的资格 Robbie Mason 报道/ Fang Chi 翻译 18位澳大利亚各地的学生主席， 包括悉尼大学的Liam Donohoe 和 Connor Wherrett，团结一致签署 了一封信，要求撤销Bettina Arndt 作为澳大利亚骑士团成员的荣誉 称号。这封信由全国学生联盟的 全国妇女协会委员Humaira Nasrin执笔完成。 女性权益部门写道：“Bettina Arndt女士所采取的行动和所作出 的评论已经违背了骑士团所支持 维护的价值观并让骑士团陷入了 信任危机。 作为众多关于“Arndt面对性别 暴力受害者表现出不敬”的例子之 一，信中重点强调了Arndt关于 Rowan Baxter谋杀Hannah Clarke

和她的三个孩子一案发表的推 特。Arndt在2月21日发布的推特 中写到“庆祝昆士兰警方不持偏见 并等待适当的证据，包括Rowan Baxter也许当时已经被“逼上梁山” 的可能性。 信中将这条推特归于“不仅是对 Hannah Clarke和她的三个孩子的 侮辱，也是对所有曾在家庭暴力 失去性命的人的侮辱。” 信里进一步指出Arndt曾反复试 图维护被定罪的恋童癖患者并将 责任转移到性侵犯幸存者身上：“ 这样的态度，会使暴力正常化， 转而加剧这个群体面临的风险。” 值得一提的是，Arndt的2018 年校园之旅被视为是一项“成就”

。这趟旅行曾遭到了有关学生活 动家的强烈反对，就在此前悉尼 大学校园内发生了多起性侵丑闻 且有人对校内根深蒂固的性别 歧视进行了调查。“在这次旅途 中，Arndt女士有意淡化性侵犯的 犯罪行为并称之为 ‘事后的出尔反 尔’，同时建议学生们在涉及性行 为前的口头承诺时 ‘不并不总是意 味着不’。这些价值观念实在令人 难以接受，与此同时也将学生置 于更危险的处境之中。 Arndt非法伪装成了一名临床 心理学家。正如最近的一份New Matilda报道中所阐述的那样，在 过去三十年时间里，在澳大利亚 各界媒体的支持下，Arndt谎报了

她并不具备的资格和专业知识。 随着联邦政府几乎一致表决通过 剥夺Arndt的荣誉，这封信则进一 步向澳大利亚骑士团理事会施加 压力。

Photo by Sky News

Eric Whittaker 的死因调查有失公正 Kedar Maddali & Vivienne Guo 报道/ Sylvia Liu 翻译 继前一起拘留期限内的死亡后， 对Eric Whittaker的死因审讯再次 引起了期盼公正的澳洲原住民的 失望。星期五上午，一小部分要 求为Eric Whittaker的死伸张正义 的群众聚集在NSW State Coroner’s Court外，旁听这场历时三年的死 因调查的最终结果。 Eric Whittaker 是一位澳大 利亚卡米勒罗伊原住民，同时 也是四个孩子的父亲。 2017年 7月4日，Whittaker于Westmead Hospital被拘留期间死亡，当时 他被铐在床上，没有任何反应， 也没有意识。 经调查Whittaker 的死因被认为是蛛网膜下腔脑出 血。 由 State Coroner Magistrate O’Sullivan宣布的法院最后裁决中 指出，Whittaker在凌晨4点至7点 间从他位于Parklea Correctional Centre的牢房中通过紧急对讲系 统打出共20个电话，请求帮助。 然而，尽管有人承认当时听到 Whittaker痛苦地大喊大叫，恳求 帮助并请求放他出去，却没有任

何人查看他的状况。 验尸官经调查承认了管教人 员的失职，指出由于Whittaker前 后矛盾地叙述了他的健康状况， 导致管教人员 James Dobry 错误 地认为 Whittaker 没有任何健康 问题。Dobry是验尸官调查结果所 引述的四名惩教人员之一，这四 名惩教人员被问责无法及时给予 Whittaker需要的紧急医疗帮助。 验尸官确认了由于惩教人员的疏 忽浪费了至关重要的三个小时。 他说，惩教人员犯下的未能适时 察觉到紧急医疗事故的发生，从 而导致Eric的治疗被延误的错误是 可耻的，治疗Eric的黄金时间被浪 费了。 管验尸官不确定早期的干预 是否能够挽救他的生命。但是 有人指出，如果能及时得到救 助，Whittaker存活的几率要高 得多。在Eric死亡期间负责管理 Parklea Correctional Centre的 GEO集团提供的证据表明，GEO 集团已经对与此案件相关的惩教 官员实施了内部惩戒。

验尸官发现的另一个疑点是对 Whittaker 的不合理束缚。 尽管限 制生理自由可被采取作为最后手 段，但是Whittaker当时已经不省 人事，却仍然被重症监护室医院 的工作人员铐在床上。 验尸官认 为没有理由将一个完全失去知觉 的人铐住，这种行为是“不尊重人 的、有辱人格的和不必要的”。据 称医院已经作出了一些名义上的 行政改变，以减少对入院囚犯使 用限制。 受命调查Eric死亡现场 环境的医学专家之一，Holdgate教 授，形容现场照片“令人感到恐惧” 。 Eric Whittaker 的死因审讯 在长期的令人憎恶的不公正系统 中只是一个案例，但这种不公正 对所有其家人在押期间死亡的家 庭影响深远。尽管原住民在羁押 期间的死亡被承认“是国家的耻 辱”，但验尸官继续声称，改进这 一不公正的制度”超出了本法院的 权力范围”，似乎免除了法院为 Whittaker家人伸张正义的责任。 验尸官在结束聆讯时重复了《乌

鲁鲁宣言》 : “按比例来说，（原住民）是 这个星球上最箝闭的人。 我们不 是天生的犯罪分子……我们的年 轻人在禁锢中凋萎，他们应该是 我们对未来的希望。” 免责声明: Nina Dillon Britton未参 与本文的编辑或出版。

NSW State Coroner’s Court外的聚 集群众 Photo by Indigenous Social Justice Association

员工在 Mardi Gras 之后争取保持休假天数 Deaglan Godwin 报道/ Lei Yao 翻译 员工们已经写了一封信，要求他 们按照往年的规定，在Mardi Gras (狂欢节）之后再放一天假。 高等学位研究管理中心 （HDRAC）的在职员工正在与悉 尼大学管理层进行一场争夺战。 这场争夺战是是为了得到对 Mardi Gras 庆祝活动的认可。这是一 项重要的文化活动。过去的几年 里，参加狂欢节大游行的HDRAC 员工有权在“狂欢节”周末之后休假 一天。这鼓励他们去参加狂欢节 的活动。狂欢节一般会一直持续 到星期六晚上，而且通常也包括 星期天。今年，由于管理层撤销 了放假的福利，许多HDRAC员工 将只能无薪去参加悉尼大学自己 的Mardi Gras花车。 撤销放假福利所带来的结果 是，三十名员工向人力资源总监 递送了公开信，其中陈述道：“我 们认为，拒绝职工特殊休假是大 学的重大退化。 《工作人员休假

政策》没有相关措辞，EBA或HR 网站上的特殊休假中也没有任何 措辞，去拒绝LGBTQI工作人员休 假一天，在Mardi Gras这项极其重 要的文化活动之后。没有任何语 言可以阻止管理层准予这一天的 特殊假，因为这有助于提高工人 在狂欢节上的参与度。” 对于受压迫少数民族来说，他们 的节日无法被基督教日历和公共 假期认可。也因此参加文化活动 之后的特殊休假特别重要，这允 许员工可以抽空参加斋月，光明 节和其他此类活动。工作人员认 为，狂欢节对于LGBTQI人群来说 是非常重要的一天，因此应该被 承认。正如一位工人宣称：“这是 同性恋的圣诞节！” 由于大学所谓的亲LGBTQI形 象，被休假的问题在某些员工中 尤为困扰。例如，大学是狂欢节 活动的共同赞助者，但是参加该 活动的工作人员（代表大学）将

不予补偿。 国家大学教育联盟（NTEU）分 支机构总裁Kurt Iveson在向大学 的Yammer网络发布的公开声明 中说：“参加该大学花车的工作人 员被要求参加几次彩排，以参加 游行，并为此投入数小时的无偿 工作，为了代表大学。他们将从 周六下午2点到深夜，持续地为 了大学工作。员工们也一直在放 弃午休时间和个人时间来制作游 行服装。同时大学将在大学的宣 传视频中使用员工的工作花絮， 以示其员工的努力。游行队伍也 被要求在游行期间接管大学的 Instagram story。” 工作人员还拍摄了一张照片，以 抗议这一倒退的决策。其中一个 标语牌上写着：“ USYD：很高兴 我们能代表你但我们没有回报。” 争议发生在大学提交澳大利亚工 作场所平等指数（AWEI）的背景 下，它将在LGBTQI工作场所包容

性领域促进自身的进步。 公开信中也表明道：“大学同 时拒绝向参加游行的人放特殊休 假，并将自己包装为一个包容性 的工作场所，这是极其令人感到 羞愧的。 LGBTQI团体明显是精 神健康问题和自杀的最高危群体 之一，我们的大学应意识到，诸 如此类的排除性决策只会加剧这 一问题。” 员工和工会组织计划继续游行 直到获得胜利。学生应该团结起 来共同反对那些对酷儿权利的攻 击。

19

SRC REPORTS

President Liam Donohoe

Though the conclusion of Welcome Week has reduced the SRC’s workload somewhat, the staff and Office Bearers haven’t been resting, using their extra time and energy to initiate new projects, set the foundations for their Collective / department, and commence campaigns. I have been as busy as ever, and am hoping to use March to finalise many projects and deliver on a number of my key campaign promises. To that end, the SRC has formed working groups to design and implement a number of projects for which we’ve received SSAF funding. One of those is our “information sessions” project, which will be a program of workshops delivered by caseworkers and others on topics relevant to students, like tenancy law / rights, rights with police, workplace law, etc. Another is our “food bank” service, which will provide food to a portion of the student body for free. In both cases the details have not been finalised and are being worked out by the working groups, which both met for the first time this week. I’m pleased to report that in both cases the meetings were productive, and I’m hoping we can launch them by April at the latest. As if that’s not enough, in week 2 the Campaign for Fair Fares (International Students receiving Concession Opal Cards) will have its first meeting, and so will the working group discussing Constitutional and Regulatory reform. The SRC Legal Service has also ramped things up in the aftermath of Welcome Week. A committee, which includes myself and Liam Thomas (General

Note: These pages belong to the Office Bearers of the SRC. They are not altered, edited or changed in any way by the editors of Honi Soit. Secretary), is in the process of interviewing lawyers to fill our current vacancy. But what’s even more exciting than the imminent second lawyer is the probable third lawyer we’re hoping to hire shortly after. Each of these new lawyers will enable us to significantly increase the breadth and depth of cases we can handle. In addition to these interviews, I also attended a helpful session on Not-For-Profit law run by Justice Connect with the rest of the SLS Board on Friday. I’m really pleased by the diligence of OBs over the past week, with collectives working hard to start designing various campaigns and initiatives. I attended the Education Action Group’s meeting earlier in the week, where we discussed how we’d respond to Michael Spence’s recent resignation, how we’d support the Gweagal-Bidjigal Resistance activities in April, and how we’d engage with Environmental Activism in the short-run. We also discussed the possibility of changes to funding arrangements in the May budget. The EAG is not the only active Collective: QUAC marched at Mardi Gras as part of the Pride in Protest float and have had some well-attended meetings, ACAR is organising a massive rally in solidarity with those in India protesting Modhi’s fascism and the International Student Collective had a well-attended drinks at Hermanns in anticipation of their first meeting. And after a massive Welcome Week which saw many new members, the Environment Collective threw themselves behind the amazing February 22nd

demonstrations last Saturday and have set the organisational foundations for a massive year of activism. On that note, I’m excited to announce that I’ve received over 400 signatures in support of a motion calling on the SRC to host a General Meeting on April the 1st to discuss (and hopefully express support for) the May 15 Climate Strikes and any May 1st International Workers’ Day strikes. There will be formal notice of this meeting and further information in

next week’s Honi Soit. And as usual I attended a few University committee meetings, including the University Executive Education Committee on Monday and Honours Admission Taskforce on Thursday. Next week sees

The Women’s Collective have had an exciting and

to Indigenous families. We’ve also held our first

time was no different. Over the coming year, we will

of the Order of Australia Award, awarded for her

successful first two weeks on campus, with over 200

collective meeting since the semester has kicked off

continue to mobilise students to support matters of

supposed work to advance ‘gender equity’. Bettina

new members signing up. During Welcome Week,

with over 30 attendees, many of them new members.

Indigenous justice, as there can be no feminist justice

Arndt is a woman who has built her career off the

we demonstrated against sexual violence on campus,

If you’d like to get involved and didn’t get a chance to

without Indigenous justice. In line with this, we’ve

lie that she is a certified clinical psychologist and

highlighting the apathetic inaction of the University

sign up during Welcome Week, get in contact with us

organised a bake sale for Thursday 5 April on Eastern

has used her falsified credentials to repeatedly and

and residential colleges. We distributed many copies of

at USydWomensCollective@gmail.com!

Ave to raise funds for Indigenous families affected by

viciously undermine survivors of sexual violence,

Blak deaths in custody.

defending pedophiles and claiming that women who

2020

& TIONURSE A T N E ORI NTERCO COU DBOOK HAN

COU COU NTER RSE

THE F SRC OLLOW FOL ’S 202 ING SE COL LOWIN 0 EDUC CTION KEE LECTIV G PIEC ATION OF TH ES P IN IS E O TOU WHICH ARE M FFICE PUBLIC R CH THE YOU ORGA EMBER S, JAZ ATION FO H CAN NISES S OF ZLYN NOT LLOWIN B AS B FIN T NEC D U AROUN HE ED REEN EEN C GA SO R O ESS N FA D A NU UCATIO AND JA LLATE ARIL TICLES CK D CEB MBE N A YT HE ARE RE OOK R O CTIO MANS AND P EDU UT : SY F PO N G CAT PRESE TO RO ELL. DNE L NT ION Y U ITICAL UP, AN THE AU GETHE OFF ATIVE NIV ICER ERS ISSUES ON CA THORS R BY T O ITY . H S, T F THE M EDU TO GE PUS A OF THE E HE T IN EDU INDIVID CAT CTIV ION V CAT ION UAL AU ACT OLVED IST T ION ACT O ION HORS’ GRO R GRO OPIN UP. STU UP DEN OR IONS O TS THE N AGA SRC LY, 201 INS . 9: A TU SAN N FIG Y P DST EAR AID HTIN ONE PLA OF GT DOE GLO CEM HE BA L SN’T ENT MO SRRIS BOOK REB BU R USY PAG WEL ELL ON N: B E HAND ES DT IO COM GOV UT–50 34IE OURS E TO RC E N D THEN - PA D TE TOges 33 COLL 35 SMRAN GE M YCOOUN 36 UR pa ARMS ENT EACGTIEVIC ERENECENT ULT NEW UDIND A DIFF PAG ST TO G U E3 RE STUL GUIDENEOOF MAKINUSTRY 7 SHO L CA N D IB DI OK ENTITIO - PA LIV RA ULD ERA NDBO COL ING NG TRAD YOUR G R L HA E A E N U TI S PAG OUR NRO EXCI IN T DIC NIV ATIO 32 A ES E S Y D N E4Y0-41 LLIN HE FEETED SH ORIENT pages 2– 38CLIM LISM - T Y ORFSIT G IN K YOUR Y39 FIND USTERFUC IELDS ATE I V E RPSAI GE THE PAG : RA ED TO CL ES 44 UPPU N C I L , CURNIS CISM YOU NE RIDICULOUS 42IS O HING IS 43 INT I V E C ER-CLA PAG N TA C EVERYT INTO TH E S OM E E4 EPR TTLE MUN SS - PA 5 S’ R NT E AND SE D GES ITIE STU SO F CO 46-47 LOU RPAG ES 4849

CON

TEN

TS

the first Academic Board and Safer Communities Advisory Group meetings, as well as a few more meetings to advance and finalise the campaigns and projects we’re been planning.

Wom*n’s Officers

Vivienne Guo and Ellie Wilson

Growing Strong and sold out of our tote bags, with all

WoCo attended the Justice for Eric student

proceeds going towards families affected by Blak deaths

contingent at the Lidcombe Coroner’s Court. Coronial

The Women’s Officers support the open letter by

in custody. Keep an eye out for more tote bags and a

inquests into Indigenous deaths in custody historically

the NUS Women’s Department calling on the Order

run of t-shirts later in the semester, which we will sell

fail to bring justice and peace to the families, and this

of Australia to strip Bettina Arndt of her Member

face domestic violence ‘push their partners too far’. It’s reprehensible that she was even considered.

to continue to raise funds to be able to provide support

International Student Officers

Ziying (Nicole) Huang, Mengfan (Karen) Ji, Mingyu (Moses) Lin, and Kigen Mera did not submit a report this week.

Sexual Harassment Officers

Kimberly Dibben, Ruby Lotz, Courtney Daley, Kira Xu

Unfortunately, we have had a busy start to the

students wherein first year (most often 18 year old)

gowns that read statistics from the Red Zone Report,

semester as Sexual Harassment OBs, as the issue is

female students are rated online, group stalked,

representing the shameful truth of sexual assault

USyd Counselling and Psychological Services

most pertinent during Welcome Week. This is made

and invited to secret sex parties. 68 college students

on campus lying under USYD’s seemingly pristine

(CAPS) Call: 1300 474 065 Text: 0488 884 429 Visit:

clear when looking back at the Red Zone Report

are sexually assaulted in Welcome Week across

reputation. “Break the silence on sexual violence”

Level 5 Jane Foss Russell Building G02 (Available

(2018) into sexual violence on campus (of which

Australia, and this predatory behaviour is to blame.

and a further history of the shameful sexual assault

9am-5pm Monday-Friday)

our following findings are sourced). It is during this

Students deserve to be free from the threat of sexual

crisis stemming from toxic college culture echoed

week in which 1 in 8 incidents of sexual violence

violence, and perpetrators must be held accoutable.

through the stalls and in front of the Great Hall,

on campus occur, and on campus caseworkers and

As advocates for survivors, we joined the Women’s

other support staff see a peak in survivors. Alongside

Collective in a rally to shine a light on the pertinence

welcoming celebrations, misogynistic and dangerous

of sexual assault during Welcome Week. On the first

hazing rituals occur within the USYD colleges, as

day of Welcome Week, members marched through

well as predatory ‘fresher fishing’ by older college

the hefty midday crowds in graduation caps and

turning heads and drawing attention to the crisis that the university would rather new students not know. In this action and all of our work this year, we support survivors and fight for their justice.

contact support through the following services:

NSW Rape Crisis Hotline: 1800 424 017 (available 24/7) Rape and Domestic Violence Services Australia: rape-dvservices.org.au RPA Sexual Assault Clinic Call: 9515 9040 Visit:16 Marsden St, Camperdown

If you or someone you know needs help, please

Welfare Officers Charlotte Ainsworth, Madeleine Clarke, Layla Mkhayber & Yilun Ma This O’Week I was glad to sit on the Welfare stall for most days. I organised with Paz from ‘Raise the Rate’ to have a bunch of their materials on our stall, as well as having a bunch of climate petitions, leaflets, bags and stickers relating to climate activism. Then that Friday I was built

and was involved in an occupation of the Sofitel hotel, protesting against their hosting of a Mining Conference in March. That protest met up with another protest outside the Canada embassy, in solidarity with the “ gas pipeline that will destroy their land. In Week One of uni, I have continued

to do stalls that sign up people to climate activism. I have also been involved in organising for LGBT + rights in the lead up to Mardi Gras. Importantly organising with the NTEU around the issue of the Sydney Uni Mardi gras float, which asks staff members to be in. For the staff that do this there

has been the precedent set that they get special leave the day after Mardi Gras, but this right was revoked this year. Organisers have spoken out against this and I’ve been involved in helping get the word out about this unfairness.

simultaneous rallies across the country. This was a 10,000 strong rally, highlighting workers rights, a just transition away from fossil fuels, Indigenous sovereignty and demanding more funding for fire fighters. A strong union presence and workers rights message on the day pushed against the belief that jobs are juxtaposed to the environmental movement. We hope to see everyone at the next climate and union events on

March 13th, May 1st and May 15th. During welcome week a rally was held by the SRC in protest of sinophobia which has escalated recently due to fears over the spread of coronavirus. This campaign has our full support. While most students started university classes this week, thousands have been unable to, as they are still caught up in the travel ban. The EAG stands in solidarity with those affected, and calls

on the government and university to implement a fair, just and effective response to this health crisis - not a racist one. We hope to see all international students back on campus soon. Last (but definitely not least) of all - farewell Michael Spence! We can’t say we’re sad to see you go. We hope that the UCL students are just as persistent at holding you to account as we have been over the years.

Education Officers Jazzlyn Breen and Jack Mansell Over the last two weeks your SRC education officers have been busy with welcome week, climate protesting, snap rallies, solidarity stunts and other related schemes. We’ve been keeping everyone updated via our Facebook page, which you can check out @sydney university education action group. On the 22nd of February we attended the Sydney climate crisis rally, just one of many

20

SRC CASEWORK HELP

Ask Abe

Special Consideration:

Can’t do an assessment because life or sickness got in the way?

SRC caseworker help Q&A Don’t get SCAMMED!

Dear Abe, I’ve heard of people missing out on important emails because they looked like scams. How can I tell if an email is genuine or fake? Optimistic

Dear Optimistic, Telling the difference between a real and a scam email can be difficult. The NSW Department of Fair Trading gives these 10 rules:

4.

Don’t open unsolicited emails or click on a link provided in an unsolicited email as it will probably lead to a fake website designed to trick you into providing personal details.

7.

Never use phone numbers provided with unsolicited requests or offers as it probably connects you to fakes who will try to trap you with lies.

8.

Don’t reply to unsolicited text messages from numbers you don’t recognise.

9.

Always look up phone numbers in an independent directory when you wish to check if a request or offer is genuine.

Don’t rely on glowing testimonials.

10. Never dial a 0055 or 1900 number unless you are sure you know how much you will be charged.

Never respond to out of the blue requests for your person al details.

If you think you might be scammed contact Fair Trading as soon as you can. Abe

GET YOUR 2020 SRC YEAR PLANNER • Important University dates & deadlines • Clear layout of teaching weeks, non-teaching weeks and exam periods • List of services and activities offered by your SRC • Fun fruity background! • Available for FREE!

sr c

2020 YEAR PLANNER MON

2

1

FEB

Welcome Week

13

12

11

10

9

8

7

6

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

10

11

8

9

NonTeaching Week Public Holiday

Public Holiday

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

11

1

JUN JULY

3

2

1

Semester 2 Begins

AUG

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

10

11

8

9

4

3

2

1

7

6

NOV

13

14

15

16

4

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

5

6

7

8

Last Day to Discontinue Fail (DF)

10

11

12

13

19

20

22

21

23

9

CE SRC LEGAL SERVI provide FREE legal advice,

agent Solicitors and a registered migration relevant, and a referral service. representation in court where • Employment law • Police & court matters • Personal / domestic violence • Traffic/transport offences • Witness / certify documents • Immigration law & visas law • Motor vehicle / insurance • Consumer rights

25

26

27

28

29

30

10

11

12

15

16

17

13

14

18

15

19

OTHER SRC SERVI CES

loans of $50 can be EMERGENCY LOANS Emergency of financial assistance. provided to students in need short term loans of OTHER LOANS We provide FREEed calculators. lab coats and university-approv SRC publishes the only weekly STUDENT PUBLICATIONS The Pick up a FREE copy of Honi student newspaper in Australia. The SRC also publishes Soit on campus or visit honisoit.com. the SRC Orientation , the Counter Course Handbook Wom*n’s Handbook. Handbook and Growing Strong

• Tax Help (July–October)

Available from the SRC offices: Level 1, Wentworth Building, City Rd.

31

possible for you to submit your application within the three working days. Supporting documentation A PPC should be dated on or before the date of the assessment, with the range of dates you are affected including the date of the assessment. It is likely that you will need to be very severely affected or totally unable to study. If you are the primary carer for someone who is sick, get a PPC to show that they were sick, and that you were very severely affected by having to care for them. It will need to be in English or accompanied by a certified English translation. If you are too unwell to go to the doctor, search the internet for a home visit GP. If you submit a false medical certificate you risk severe penalties, including being excluded from university. Special arrangements If your study is affected by an event that is not sickness or misadventure, you can apply for ‘special arrangements’. This includes, but is not limited to, jury duty, court summons, armed service, birth or adoption of a child, an essential religious commitment, sporting or cultural commitments where you are representing the University, state or country, and in some cases essential employment. This does not include attending a wedding. You will need to provide supporting documentation and apply using the Special Consideration portal. For final exams, this must be lodged no more than 14 days after the exam timetable is published. Disability If you have a long term or pre-existing medical condition you can apply for disability support. Disability Services can help you to create an academic plan to successfully complete your degree with any reasonable accommodations, so contact them as soon as possible.

12

Study Vacation Week

14

24

20

16

17

19

18

20

21

22

Exam Period

21

22

23

24

25

Public Holiday

26

27

Public Holiday

SRC COLLE CTIVE S

23

24

25

26

27

28

30

29

Exam Period

28

Public Holiday

Join an SRC collective! Passionate about social change? Group • Indigenous • Wom*n’s • Education Action Students’ • Queer • Environment • International Racism • Autonomous Collective Against • Welfare • Student Housing • Global Solidarity & Carers • Social Justice • Disabilities • Campus Refugee Action go to: srcusyd.net.au/src-departments For contacts and meeting times

29

30

31

SrcHelp

usydsrc

srclegalservice src_usyd key dates visit: For additional information on es.html sydney.edu.au/students/study-dat

Rd, down the Find the SRC: Enter from City 1, Wentworth stairs, near footbridge. Level Sydney. Building (G01), University of 9am–5pm Office Hours: Monday–Friday, make a booking, Appointments: Please call to u.au p: 9660 5222, or e: help@src.usyd.ed required Drop-in sessions: No appointment 1–3pm Tuesdays & Thursdays, to book a Other Campuses: Please call campus visit, p: 9660 5222

Madsen

Administration

Carslaw LEES1

D ROA CITY

Fo otb rid ge

SRC DOWN STAIRS

SRC

Jane Foss Russell

Wentworth

Merewether

nue Ave

• Academic progress, show cause & exclusion • All Centrelink matters • Harassment & discrimination • Credit, debt & financial issues

18

lin But

FREE, independent and

Last Day to Withdraw (WD)

NonTeaching Week

Eastern Avenue

DEC ORKER HELP SRC CASEWconfidential advice & support:

27

26

11

13

2

17

Exam timetables released

10

3

2

12

11

9

1

1

Last Day to Discontinue Not Fail (DC)

30

29

28

8

10

Public Holiday

OCT

• Tenancy & accommodation • Academic rights & appeals • Special consideration & special arrangements • HECS & fee refunds • Misconduct & academic dishonesty allegations

16

15

14

13

12

25

24

23

22

21

20

19

18

17

6

5

Census Date

5 4

7

SEP T

31

30

29

28

27

26

3 2

1

1

21

20

19

18

17

31

30

29

25

24

23

22

28

27

26

25

24

23

22

21

20

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

30

29

28

27

26

25

24

23

22

19

18

17

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

Last Day to Discontinue Fail (DF)

Exam Period

Exam Period Public Holiday

Study Vacation Week

21

20

19

18

17

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

9

8

31

30

29

28

27

26

25 13

10

7

6

5

9

24

23

22

21

20

19

18 12

Exam timetables released

SRC Closed

4

3

2

Last Day to Withdraw (WD)

30

8

17

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

Public Last Day to Discontinue Holiday Not Fail (DC)

29

28

27

26

25

24

23

22

21

20

19

18

17

16

15

14

13

12

Public Holiday

Public Holiday

7

MAY

Census Date

6 5

4

2

APR

31

30

29

28

27

26

25

24

23

22

21

20

19

18

17

3

MAR

Weekend!

1

16

15

14

Exam Period

29

28

W

5

4

3

2

1

Teaching Week

Semester 1 Begins

27

26

25

24

23

22

21

20

19

18

17

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

KEY:

Public Holiday

Non-Teaching Week

Public Holiday

JAN

26

25

24

23

22

21

Semester Week #

#

Don’t focus on the event itself, but rather the severity of the impact that you experienced. So, for something like the death of a family member, you will need to show that the person died (e.g. funeral service leaflet), as well as a PPC to show that you were severely affected by grief. Be aware that in most cases the University’s Counselling and Psychology Service will not give you a PPC, and you will need to gain a PPC from another treating psychologist or doctor. If you are successful in your application you might be given an extension, a supplementary exam (that usually occurs in week 18), or in some limited cases, a re-weighting of assessments. They cannot give you extra marks. If you continue to be affected by illness or misadventure, you can apply for special consideration for these alternative assessments. Where the faculty is unable to provide an additional supplementary assessment, you should be given a Discontinue Not Fail (DC) grade.

TUE

MON

SUN

SAT

FRI 31

30

29

28

27

THU

WED

TUE

MON

SUN

SAT

FRI

THU

WED

TUE

20

19

18

17

16

SUN

SAT

FRI

THU

WED 15

14

13

12

11

TUE

MON

SUN

SAT

FRI 10

9

8

7

6

THU

WED

TUE

MON

SUN 5

4

3

2

1

SAT

FRI

THU

WED

TUE

activis m advoca cy repres entatio n MON

You can apply for special consideration if you are unable to complete an assessment or exam because you, or someone you are the primary carer for, is affected by short term illness (mental or physical) or misadventure, or an exacerbation of a disability, that is outside of your control, unexpected, and affects you severely. Long term illness is considered a disability and should be addressed through the University’s Disability Service. You must submit your application within three working days of the assessment, together with documentation to support your claim. This might be a Professional Practitioner’s Certificate (PPC), police report, death notice, etc. While a statutory declaration might support your other documents, usually it is not considered helpful as a document on its own.

ST

3.

Never send money or give credit card, account or other personal details to anyone who makes unsolicited offers or requests for your information.

6.

KI NG

2.

Don’t respond to offers, deals or requests for your personal details.

Always type in the address of the website of a bank, business or authority you are interested in to ensure you are logging into a genuine website.

TO

1.

5.

t cen e Cres Maz

Molecular Bioscience

Something less severe A Unit of Study Coordinator is able to grant a two-working day extension for a non-examination task. Note that this does not change any conditions for special consideration. Late applications The University will consider late special consideration applications only if you can provide evidence that it was absolutely not

Unsuccessful? You can appeal a rejected special consideration application. Address the issues they have raised, and submit it within 15 working days of the original decision. Need help? For help with special consideration applications email an SRC Caseworker at help@src.usyd.edu.au. We are happy to give you advice.

Contact an SRC Caseworker on 02 9660 5222 or email help@src.usyd.edu.au

21

PUZZLES

Omega

ACROSS

Sad (7) 1 Southern drink: mint ... (5) 5 King of the planets (7) 8 Primary (5) 12 Catalonian capital (9) 13 Craze, trajectory (5) 14 Betting shop (3) 15 Perhaps (5) 16 A self-contradictory phrase (8) 17 See 8 Down 18 The new name for RTA (3) 19 A teller of mistruths (4) 21 23/30 TV show featuring Countess in Picture A (7,5) Reproductive machine: photo ... (6) 25 Jewish person from Central or Eastern 27 Europe (9) See 23 30 Fruit with varieties including water 31 and rock (5) Hail (3) 32 A thing that holds others together (4) 33

ACROSS 34 36 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 52 54 55 57 60 61 62 63 64 65 66

Film franchise featuring chief spy in Picture B (5,4) Title held by both actresses in today’s Pictures (4) Aussie bird (3) Country: East ... (5) Rounded piece of cutlery (5) Moving staircase (9) Dough such as filo or puff (6) Performing gymnast (7) Abominable snowman (4) Month between Jul and Sep (3) Player of a woodwind instrument (6) Plumage (8) Killer whales (5) Finger of the foot (3) Caribbean country (5) Italian appetisers (9) Service station (slang) (5) Dried grapes (7) Length of a supermarket (5) Paradise (7)

DOWN

1 2/3

Picture A

Picture B

Picture D

Picture C

Picture E

Picture F

Target

B A T E E E C L R

10 words: Grandmama 20 words: Itt 60 words: Thing

Sudoku

Solutions for Week 1 edition Cryptic

P V C H I L D R A R A N D S T E R M I A A L E C A A A U G U S G W H E T T A M E T R I R T

T A P R E N O P O A N J O L L Y A T N A L A S O I L O C A L I K T S U D D E A R O G E R A O I C S I N G Y H G

22

S D E R A S L Y F E L T I S I G N C H O P T S R E N L Y A R U B Y O I U L A R E L

Strange, unknown (10) Film franchise featuring Scots schoolmarm in Picture C (5,6) 4 Louts, larrikins (6) 5 Cured and dried meat (5) 6 Prostrate oneself (3,4) 7 Jump into someone else’s pic (9) 8/18 Film featuring Scots schoolmarm in Picture D: The Prime of Miss ... (4,6) 9 Small mousish marsupial (7) 10 Common gym machine (9) 11 Misleading clue (3,7) 20 Average; cruel (4) 22 Sound of a sneeze (5) 24 Narcotic derived from poppies (5) 26 Consisting of two parts (6) 28 Older (5) 29 Alter, fine-tune (6) 30 Criminal fire-lighting (5) 31 Prize necklace (5) 35 Die Zauberflöte or La Bohème, for example (5) 37 A thousand millimetres (5) 38 Cinderella had a wicked one (10) 40 Deluge of ideas (10) 42 Both actresses in today’s Pictures feature in this film: Tea with ... (9) 44 Choir of instruments (9) 46 Native people of Japan and Russia (4) 48 Composer of many a 35 Across (7) 50 Tentacly creature (7) 52/53 TV show featuring businesswoman in Picture E (2,4,4,2) 56 Happen as a result (5) 58 The Queen’s preferred breed of dog (5) 59 Film featuring Jellicle leader in Picture F (4)

Quick

C L C O L O R C V L O V E O K N I C K H L O V E L S O Y S T E M O P A L I O C A N V A N E

C L E A D O P R N V I I D E A L N O E R S G A H U S E R V E U U R B I R D P E R E L I C I O E S V E S U E E S

L L O T O N V U E R I N S L A X Y I I L O V E A C A G E I L O V E O E V I U S E P

Target: Wednesday

Puzzles by Tournesol. Solutions next week. Crossword Society meets in the ISL at 1pm on Mondays and 3pm on Thursdays.

THE

RODENT REVIEW Fierce, independent journalists controlled by the rats on our heads!

Local gay centrist moved by compelling Meryl Streep performance to become a Thatcher-loving, far right dickhead Marlow Hurst, Intersectional Gay and Conservative Editor In an entirely expected twist, local gay centrist Chester Greenfield has joined his leafy suburb’s chapter of the Young Liberals after watching Meryl Streep’s commanding performance as Margaret Thatcher in The Iron Lady. The WHO did identify the film’s Thatcher friendly messaging as a risk when it first came out with the Director of Public Cinematic Health stating that “On its own, the narrative of the film is harmless, but when presented by such a raw theatrical force as Meryl Streep...well, that’s when things get messy.” Chester has a different story: “The Iron Lady just helped me realised what I already knew all along,” he told our investigative team while making an anti-union poster (which he plans to put up at school) on Microsoft Word. “The reality is that British coal miners have to send this striking nonsense immediately. They’re bringing the country to its knees. It’s totally unpatriotic what with the Falklands crisis and everything.” The remainder of the interview was spent explaining to Chester that he did not live in 1980s Britian.

ANNOUNCEMENT: The Rodent Review has outsourced all comedy to poorly paid overseas labour. So you can’t get mad at us! Sorry! In this issue: Sydney Tory in race with Honi Soit to become most conservative newspaper / p. 7 Why Elizabeth Warren would be a better female president than Bernie Sanders / p. 15

Margaret Thatcher, or Meryl Streep, she’s that good.

Pride Flag atop Great Hall successfully makes everyone forget about homophobic ex-Head of Security / p. 26 Please help I’m stuck in the Nicholson Museum / p. 40

Ramsay Centre decides to skip the middleman and offer degree through ADFA Felix Faber, Wannabe ADFA Bro turned Editor In a huge win for the efficiency-minded everywhere, the controversial Ramsay Centre has decided to stop faffing about with its Bachelor of Western Civilisation and offer it directly through ADFA. “Really, this is a win-win situation,” said Ramsay spokesperson, Gerald Tuffington. “The Ramsay degree has really always been about justifying western imperialism. By offering it to ADFA students we can give that information to the people carrying out that imperialism. It’s that sort of efficiency that scratches my Protestant ethical itch.” Lieutenant General Carl Carlton, Vice Chancellor of ADFA, agreed, saying “we’d been running out of classes to teach our students that don’t mention women or queers anyway, so this was a lifesaver for our curriculum. Simple as mate.” Rodney Douglas, an incoming ADFA student seemed equally enthused. “Fuark mate, you’re telling me I get a scholarship too? Not bad at all,” said the recent Scotch College graduate. “How much is it? Like, ten grand at least yeah? Fuark mate how many bags is that?” University of Sydney Vice-Chancellor Michael Spence was unable to offer comment, being too busy seething in an unlit room at being passed over for the Racism Degree.

Forcing Michael Kirby to take a photo with every law student in Australia is elder abuse, Royal Commission hears Nina Dillon Britton, Old White Men Editor The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality has ruled that former High Court judge, Michael Kirby, must not be forced to take any more photos with Australian law students, following alarming evidence. The illustrious High Court judge has not been allowed to take a rest from touring Foundations of Law lectures and taking selfies with law students since he retired 11 years ago. On one count, only three law students in Australia do not have Facebook profile pictures with His Honour. Student law societies around the country, however have denied claims that Justice Kirby was forced to do anything against his will. “Kirby thrives in his natural environment of debased, sycophantic law students,” a SULS spokesperson told The Rodent. “This cage? This is for his own safety. He has plenty of room to roam, and he’s fed daily.” However leaked documents have indicated a sinister plot to acquire more High Court judges to shore up law student clout. One message from an Australia student law society, shown to the The Rodent detailed a plan to capture Chief Justice Mason “with a big net.”

23

Free our baboon king!