This Week: 5 ~ Spring Valley 9 ~ Health 10-11 ~ Calendar 13-16 ~ Español 19 ~ Eclipse!
Your nonprofit
community newspaper
Volume 16, Number 9 | April 11 - April 17, 2024
Teamwork makes the dream work
By James Steindler Contributing Editor As of April 3, after two decades of sweat and tears, the Thompson Divide was guaranteed protection from future mineral leasing — well, at least for the next 20 years. “The Biden-Harris administration today [April 3] took action to finalize protections for the Thompson Divide area in central Colorado, one of the state’s most cherished landscapes, known for its ranching heritage and grazing lands, important wildlife habitat, recreation opportunities and clean water,” read a press release from the U.S. Department of the Interior. “Federal law provides the Secretary of the Interior authority to administratively withdraw lands from mining and oil and gas leasing for a period of up to 20 years,” a press release from Wilderness Workshop (WW) clarified. That is exactly what the department did in the case of the Thompson Divide. Peter Hart, an attorney with WW since 2007, recalled the formative days of the Thompson Divide Coalition which grew from a myriad of folks from different walks of life. In the late 1990s, WW was conducting inventories of local public lands to better engage in an ongoing revision of the Forest Plan. Through that process, Sloan Shoemaker, WW's first full-time employee, and others began to really understand the ecological value of the Thompson Divide. "It was this big swath of mid-elevation forest land with large chunks that hadn’t been torn up or fragmented by roads,” said Hart. "That is an increasingly rare combination in this state." In 2002, after the Forest Service instituted its new Forest Plan and former President George W. Bush was elected, there was a “leasing frenzy,” according to Hart, including the Bush administration selling “a bunch of oil and gas leases up in the Thompson Divide.” “Those oil and gas leases captured the attention of the local community as well,” said Hart. “People more broadly than just WW began to understand the threat posed to this landscape … and the local people’s way of life.”
Part of the expansive community that's been at the heart of the effort to protect the Thompson Divide celebrated the 20-year administrative mineral withdrawal at Carbondale Beer Works on April 5. Photo by Raleigh Burleigh
“I think the most telling thing … is how unified the broader community was behind this issue,” he continued. “When the Thompson Divide Coalition began it was a coalition of strange bedfellows.” Public lands advocates, water advocates, ranchers, snowmobilers, hunters and fishers, Republicans and Democrats, along with other interest groups continue to make up the Thompson Divide Coalition. Their efforts have been steady and have resulted in milestones of success over the years. Hart pointed out that there used to be a lot more leases (roughly 80) in the Thompson Divide than there are today. “There has not been a lease sale for any acreage in the Thompson Divide since 2007,” he stated. Those most recent leases were purchased by Gunnison Energy in the Upper North Fork and Clear Creek area. There are still about nine exploratory oil and gas leases within the administrative withdrawal boundary. However, most of these leases only partially overlap the boundary with large portions outside of it. There are another 11 storage leases associated with the Wolf Creek Storage Field. The storage leases are a result of drilling in the 1970s and wells that eventually dried up. Today, the Wolf Creek facility stores natural gas produced further west in the Piceance Basin. The gas is stored through the summer and distributed in the winter to help heat people’s homes in the Valley. The coalition has not contested the site because it’s already existing infrastructure. Likewise, “The administrative withdrawal is subject to all valid existing rights,” clarified Hart. “That basically means that that storage facility won’t be impacted. Neither will the handful of leases that still exist. If an operator wants to come in and drill those exploratory leases and they’re valid existing rights, they have the right to do that.” He added that there is some controversy as to whether or not all of the existing leases are valid. continues on page 18