“I have an older brother and a younger brother, and as the middle child, I was often the one who had to mediate disputes. I learned how to bring people together, find common ground, and work through disagreements. Looking back, being the one in the middle was great preparation for a career in the law,” he says.
The skills he developed early in life have become hallmarks of his legal career. Known for his tenacity and unwavering commitment to his clients, Francavilla has represented individuals in some of the nation’s most notable cases, including one with Olympic proportions.
A Fight Beyond The Mat
Richard Perry, a young wrestler seeking a position on the U.S. Olympic team, attended a national wrestling camp at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton in 2020. During the camp, USA Wrestling conducted simulated combat exercises to fulfill contractual obligations related to training and promotional videos.
That training involved participating in drills modeled after exercises used to prepare Marines for life-and-death combat situations. While Marines typically spend years training before participating in these exercises, the wrestlers were expected to perform them without receiving any prior instruction in this type of simulated combat. Instead, participants faced one another wearing cage-style helmets with narrow openings, similar to those worn in hockey, and carrying padded batons resembling boat paddles. They were instructed to attack one another and score a “kill shot” to the head, a decision that would have devastating consequences. Because of his size, Perry was given a traditional football helmet, which had wider openings than the cage-style helmets worn by the other participants. During one of the exercises, his opponent was using a worn-out baton. As he attempted a “kill shot,” the baton’s protective cover tore away, allowing it to pass through the opening in Perry’s face mask. The exposed baton struck Perry’s right eye socket, penetrated his brain, and caused catastrophic injuries. The trauma was so severe that, while Perry was in surgery, his wife was told to prepare for the worst. The Olympic dream he had spent years pursuing was over.
Perry and the legal team focused on demonstrating that, although he had reached the highest levels of competitive wrestling, he was never trained to participate in military combat exercises. Their case emphasized that excelling in one sport did not prepare an athlete for dangerous combat drills that require years of specialized training, especially when worn-out equipment is involved.
Although the activity was presented as cross-training, the United States and USA Wrestling vigorously defended the case, contesting nearly every issue. “I don’t get intimidated
by the lawyers, firms, or entities I go up against, regardless of their reputation, size, or resources. I look at every case as a challenge. I do whatever it takes to achieve the best possible outcome for the people I represent, and that’s exactly what we did,” Francavilla says.
Working alongside his law partner, Adam B. Levine, Francavilla secured a $12 million recovery for Perry and his family from the United States of America.
Leaving No Stone Unturned
CaseyGerry Francavilla Blatt primarily handles catastrophic personal injury and wrongful death cases, often representing clients against powerful corporations and large insurance companies with extensive legal and financial resources. Francavilla thrives on taking on organizations that believe they are already on the winning side of a case.
“I try to understand what my clients go through every day. They wake up in pain, and they go to bed with that same pain every night. I strive to help a jury understand not only the extent of my clients’ pain and the profound impact it has had on their lives, but also the responsibility of the organizations whose actions or inactions caused that pain, grief, harm, and loss,” he says.
Whether he is in the courtroom or at the negotiating table, Francavilla is committed to outworking the defense and doing everything possible to achieve the best outcome for his clients. His approach is to know every detail of a case by mastering the law, uncovering critical evidence, and understanding exactly what his clients have endured. He then presents that story in a way that helps judges and juries understand both the full extent of a client’s suffering and the responsibility of those who caused it. “I dig deep to find out what every moment of every day is like for my client in order to make a positive change in the quality and enjoyment of their lives and get them the justice that they truly deserve. I always fight with real passion and true belief in my client,” he says.
That philosophy was put into practice in a case involving a woman injured while exiting a rideshare vehicle. The driver stopped at a red light rather than pulling over to a safe location, leaving her no choice but to exit while the rideshare vehicle remained in traffic. As she stepped out, another vehicle pulled away from a parallel parking space beside the rideshare vehicle, crushing her leg between the two vehicles and causing a serious fracture.
Francavilla secured a several-million-dollar recovery on her behalf. While he was pleased with the outcome for his client, he also believed the case had the potential to influence rideshare industry safety policies and practices. “She was one of the sweetest, kindest people I’ve ever represented, and she deserved full compensation,” he says.
Another case that Robert tried with his partner Gayle Blatt involved an incident in a gym in which the at-fault defendant offered minor compensation for a major injury. Their client had regularly played basketball at the gym in question for years. Overnight when cleaning the basketball court, the gym’s maintenance company had mistakenly put stainless steel polish on the floor instead of the type of wood polish required for basketball courts. Francavilla’s client slipped, fell and suffered a major injury to his ankle.
The gym did not take the incident seriously, claiming that players slipped on basketball courts all the time and it was just “one of those things that happen”. The defendants also argued that the plaintiff suffered, “only a sprained ankle.” Francavilla demonstrated that the maintenance company negligently applied the wrong product to the court and that the gym failed to properly inspect and oversee the work. Moreover, he proved the injury caused a substantial change in his client’s quality and enjoyment of life.
The defendants initially offered pennies on the dollar to resolve the case. Francavilla and Blatt refused to settle, took the case to trial, and a jury awarded their client nearly $2 million.
Turning Doubt Into Determination
Looking at Robert Francavilla’s career today, it’s hard to imagine that one of his greatest sources of motivation came from one of the biggest setbacks of his academic career. During his first semester of law school, he earned the lowest grade in his contracts class. Determined to improve, he met with his professor to understand where he had gone wrong. The professor told Francavilla that he had completely missed the mark. His advice was to head to the admissions office, request a tuition refund, and pursue another career because he simply did not have what it takes to become a lawyer.
Unwilling to let someone else define his future, Francavilla accepted the professor’s remarks as a challenge. He persevered through law school, and even though he graduated just above 50 percent of his class, he was determined to prove that one grade would not define the rest of his career and that he could become a great trial lawyer.
The lesson he took from that experience led to a lifelong commitment to mentoring law students and young attorneys. “I went into that meeting with the professor operating out of fear, but he did me a real favor because I came out of there resolved to do everything possible to become a great trial lawyer. Today, I tell new lawyers to always believe in themselves and to never let anybody tell them that they can’t do something. And never, ever think about the money. Think about the good we are trying to accomplish for the people we represent,” Francavilla says.
Paying It Forward
The law student once encouraged to seek a tuition refund is now a partner at one of California’s premier personal injury firms, where he works alongside ten attorneys and a dedicated support staff committed to serving individuals and families during some of the most challenging times of their lives. Today, he leads by example both in the courtroom and through mentorship.
Francavilla believes the best way to motivate others is by leading through example. Despite practicing law for several decades, he continues to be one of the hardest-working
attorneys at the firm, approaching each day with the same dedication to his clients and their cases as he did on his first day on the job. His door is always open, and he is known for providing guidance, advice, and mentorship to fellow attorneys and staff alike. “Our people make the biggest difference in our success. Without them, I would never have accomplished what I have. I am grateful for the success I have had as a lawyer, but I also recognize and appreciate just how important my amazing team is to the results we achieve for the deserving people we represent.”
Francavilla leads Team RJF, a group of outstanding legal minds. He directly oversees associate attorneys Samantha
Kaplan and Kelly Wacker, along with talented paralegal Andrea Melgoza. Supporting the team are investigator Paul Francavilla, Robert’s brother, and Steve Leonard, whom Managing Partner David S. Casey Jr. has nicknamed the firm’s “air traffic controller.”
A Family Affair
One of Francavilla’s most memorable case strategies came from an unexpected source: his family. In a case involving a client who was struck by an intoxicated driver after crossing against a red light, the legal challenges were significant. While discussing the case at home, his 20-year-old son,
Zach, asked a simple question: “Dad, when I’m leaving the house, what are you most likely to tell me about safety? Don’t jaywalk or don’t drink and drive?” The question reshaped the way Francavilla viewed the case. It became the central theme, and his client ultimately prevailed.
Francavilla and his wife, Carla, have been married for 25 years and have two sons, Zach, 20, and Dominic, 16. “I was worried about the outcome of an important case some time ago, and Carla gave me some great advice that all attorneys should follow. She told me to focus on the process, and the outcome would take care of itself. As usual, my wife was right again.”
(Left to Right) Robert Francavilla, Dominic (16), Carla, and Zach (20).
That same sense of family extends into Francavilla’s professional life. His brother, Paul Francavilla, has served as one of the firm’s private investigators for more than 20 years, further emphasizing the family values that have guided both Robert’s life and career.
Outside the courtroom, Francavilla and his wife Carla, enjoy attending their sons’ various sporting events, and as selfproclaimed sports fanatics, the entire family loves watching games and playing basketball together. Zach was a Varsity basketball player at Cathedral Catholic and is now head basketball coach for Cathedral’s freshman team. He also studies finance at Cal State San Marcos. Dominic is now a Varsity basketball player and great student at Cathedral. Much of their travel revolves around their sons’ high school and AAU basketball competitions, but they also enjoy taking family vacations to Hawaii.
“If I have to work until midnight just so I can attend one of their games, that’s what I do. My family injects me with the fuel I need to keep going. I love them dearly. My family is everything to me, and that’s the same type of passion and care that I put into my clients’ cases and my law practice,” he says.
Francavilla believes that being an effective advocate requires continual learning, both inside and outside the courtroom. He stays physically and mentally sharp by working out at the gym four times a week, studying accomplished trial lawyers, and trying cases whenever he has the opportunity. He unwinds with action movies, comedies, and television series.
One of the things Francavilla enjoys most about practicing law is the opportunity to learn something new every day. This ensures the law remains exciting and invigorating. It is a mindset he encourages in the young attorneys he mentors, believing that a commitment to continual learning helps them grow not only as lawyers, but as people.
“Think about what we do. Every day we help right a wrong or prevent an injustice that otherwise would occur if we didn’t step in and do something. I like working hard because I think that’s one thing we can do in this world to show ourselves and others that we can truly make a difference. The harder you work at something, the more likely you are to succeed. And my family and clients are more than worth the effort.” n
Contact
CaseyGerry Francavilla Blatt LLP
110 Laurel Street
San Diego, CA, 92101-1486
619-238-1811
www.CaseyGerry.com
EXPERIENCE
(Left to Right) Steve Leonard, Samantha Kaplan, Robert J. Francavilla, Andrea Melgoza, Paul Francavilla, and Kelly Wacker.
» EDUCATION
• J.D., University of San Diego
• B.B.A., University of San Diego
»
HONORS & AWARDS
• Top Plaintiff Lawyers 2025, Daily Journal
• Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiff Consumer Lawyers (2019–2025)
• The Best Lawyers in America (2008–2026)
• Top 50: San Diego Super Lawyers (2008–2010, 2018, 2024–2026)
• San Diego Super Lawyers (2007–2026)
• Trial Lawyer of the Year, Consumer Attorneys of San Diego (2016)
• Outstanding Trial Lawyers Award, Consumer Attorneys of San Diego (Seven-Time Recipient)
• Best Attorneys, SD Metro Magazine (2017)
• Top 25 Plaintiff Lawyers, Daily Journal (2015)
• Lawyer of the Year, Products Liability Litigation— Plaintiffs, Best Lawyers (2014)
• 50 People to Watch, San Diego Magazine (2012)
• Top Attorneys, San Diego Daily Transcript (2012–2013)
• Top 50 San Diego Super Lawyers (2010)
» PROFESSIONAL
ASSOCIATIONS
• State Bar of California
• American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA)
• International Academy of Trial Lawyers (IATL)
• American Association for Justice (AAJ)
• Consumer Attorneys of California, Board of Governors (1998)
Empower Your Law Practice with Tailored Banking Solutions
Full-Service Banking for the Legal Industry
At California Bank & Trust, we understand that attorneys and law firms require more than generic banking. That’s why we offer fullservice, tailored banking solutions exclusively for law firms—from solo practitioners to large practices.
Let our knowledgeable bankers and years of experience help you optimize operations and advance your firm with confidence.
Scan the QR code to see how we can support your law firm.
Most attorneys chase growth. Few build it to last. Across the legal profession, one trend is becoming increasingly clear: many attorneys experience periods of rapid growth, but far fewer build practices that continue thriving year after year. The difference isn’t talent alone. It’s the systems, relationships, and mindset that allow success to compound over time.
Too often, growth is viewed as landing the next big client or winning the next significant case. While those milestones matter, they don’t necessarily create lasting momentum. Sustainable growth comes from making intentional decisions that strengthen an attorney’s foundation long before the results become visible.
Why Growth Looks Different In Today’s Legal Market
Across firms of every size, leaders are asking the same question: Why do some attorneys continue growing through changing markets while others plateau after early success?
Several factors are contributing to this challenge:
• Competition continues to increase, making differentiation more important than ever.
• Client expectations have evolved, with greater emphasis on efficiency, communication, responsiveness, and consistency.
• Technology and AI are reshaping how legal services are delivered, rewarding firms that adapt early.
• Growth is becoming more operational, requiring attorneys to build businesses—not simply maintain busy practices.
The attorneys who sustain growth over years, or even decades, recognize that success isn’t built on isolated wins. It’s built on repeatable habits that create long-term value.
What Separates Attorneys Who Build Lasting Growth?
They prioritize trust over transactions. The strongest practices are built one interaction at a time. Every client call, email, and meeting either strengthens or
How Can Attorneys Build Growth That Lasts Beyond Early Success?
by Kara Lamar
weakens trust. Attorneys who experience sustained growth consistently focus on responsiveness, clear communication, honest expectation-setting, and emotional intelligence. Their reputation becomes their most valuable business development asset because clients refer them with confidence.
They build a business, not just a practice.
Many talented attorneys eventually become the bottleneck in their own growth because every decision, workflow, and client interaction depends on them personally. Sustainable growth requires stepping back from purely doing the work to intentionally shaping how the work gets done through clearer processes, smarter delegation, more intentional use of support, and better systems for client experience. Over time, growth becomes less dependent on the attorney’s constant involvement and more dependent on how effectively they’ve structured their practice to run and scale.
They invest in relationship capital long before they need it.
The most valuable referral networks rarely appear overnight. Attorneys with enduring success consistently invest time in former clients, referral sources, professional peers, community leaders, and court personnel. They stay connected through genuine relationships rather than constant self-promotion, allowing trust to compound over time.
They adapt before change becomes unavoidable.
Legal markets are constantly evolving. Consumer expectations shift. Technology advances. Billing models change. New practice areas emerge while others become more competitive. Rather than resisting change, successful attorneys evaluate new trends early and make thoughtful adjustments before external pressure forces them to react.
They develop the discipline to endure.
Legal practice is demanding, and long-term growth requires more than ambition. It requires emotional resilience. The attorneys who sustain momentum learn to navigate setbacks without making reactive decisions, maintain healthy boundaries, stay disciplined during slower periods, and remain focused on long-term objectives instead of short-term fluctuations.
How To Put It Into Practice
1. Think in decades, not quarters.
Attorneys who build enduring practices ask different questions. Instead of focusing only on immediate revenue, they ask whether today’s decisions will strengthen their reputation, positioning, and scalability five or even ten years from now.
2. Become known for something specific.
General visibility may generate attention, but specific expertise generates referrals. The strongest personal brands are built around a clear niche, a distinctive client experience, or a particular type of matter.
3. Build consistency into everything you do.
Long-term success rarely comes from occasional bursts of effort. It comes from consistently delivering exceptional client service, following up with contacts, investing in relationships, improving operations, and leading teams with discipline over time.
4. Invest in your people as much as your practice.
Eventually, growth becomes less about legal skill and more about
leadership. Attorneys that continue growing and honing their practice invest in associates, paralegals, intake professionals, operations leaders, and marketing partners who strengthen the client experience.
5. Create systems that compound.
The most successful attorneys don’t rely on momentum alone. They build repeatable systems for client service, business development, operations, and leadership that continue producing results regardless of market conditions. Over time, these small improvements create a significant competitive advantage.
Short-term success is often driven by individual accomplishments. Long-term success is built through systems, relationships, and habits that compound over time.
The attorneys who experience sustained growth aren’t simply chasing the next opportunity. They’re intentionally building practices that become stronger, more resilient, and more valuable with every client they serve and every decision they make. n
Kara Lamar is an Affiliated Marketing Consultant with Society 54, where she helps businesses identify and act on opportunities to strengthen their marketing performance. Her work centers on using client and business data to shape communication strategies and to build brand visibility through storytelling and thought leadership. Learn more at www.society54.com.
CALIFORNIA
SUPREME COURT
Civil Procedure
California Case Summaries New California Civil Cases
by Monty A. McIntyre, Esq.
These recent case summaries were provided by Monty A. McIntyre, a mediator, arbitrator and referee and come from his online publication California Case Summaries™ (https://cacasesummaries.com), which helps California civil lawyers and law firms win more cases by always knowing the new case law in their practice areas. Law Firms and Solo Practitioners can get a free 1-year subscription to California Case Summaries™ when they mediate with Monty. Monty handles cases in the areas of employment, torts, business, insurance, real property and trust and estate/probate. To easily schedule a mediation, pick your date at https://montymcintyre.com.
J.O. v. Super. Ct. (2026) _ Cal.App.5th _ , 2026 WL 1488791: the California Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeal decision summarily denying writ relief after the trial court denied petitioner’s objection to County Counsel’s alleged blanket Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6 challenges to Judge Guy Castillo. The trial court denied the objection, concluding it was barred under Solberg v. Superior Court (1977) 19 Cal.3d 182 (Solberg) and the Court of Appeal summarily denied writ relief. The California Supreme Court overruled Solberg to the extent it immunized blanket abuses of section 170.6 from as-applied separation of powers challenges, holding that if a party makes a prima facie showing of bad faith blanket challenges, a court may look behind the section 170.6 affidavit and inquire into the legitimacy of the prejudice claim, and remanded to the Court of Appeal for further proceedings. Practitioner Takeaways: (1) Courts may now entertain separation of powers objections to alleged blanket section 170.6 challenges—the Solberg shield is gone; (2) a party opposing a section 170.6 motion must timely object and establish a prima facie case of bad faith blanket challenges using a Batson v. Kentucky (1986) 476 U.S. 79 style burden-shifting framework; (3) the separation of powers problem arises from the legislative scheme itself, meaning blanket abuses by any party—not just executive branch actors—may be challenged; and (4) the Legislature retains authority to amend section 170.6, and further statutory reform addressing blanket challenges remains a live possibility. (May 28, 2026.)
CALIFORNIA COURTS OF APPEAL
Employment
Smith v. The Superior Court of Alameda County (2026) _ Cal.App.5th _ , 2026 WL 1876096: The Court of Appeal reversed the trial court and granted a writ petition vacating the trial court’s order. Plaintiffs, who were former class members in Vaughn, et al. v. Tesla, Inc. (Super. Court Alameda County, 2017, No. RG17882082) (Vaughn), alleged, in five related complaints filed by 440 Tesla factory workers, that defendant Tesla, Inc. (Tesla) maintained a pattern and practice of racial discrimination and harassment at its factory and systematically failed to investigate or address it, in violation of FEHA. The trial court found misjoinder and ordered that, in each of five related complaints filed by 440 former Tesla factory workers, all plaintiffs except the first-named must be dismissed and refiled individually. The Court of Appeal disagreed and held the claims were properly joined under Code of Civil Procedure section 378 because they arose from a common corporate policy or practice, and that section 379.5 did not authorize the trial court to dismiss properly joined plaintiffs based on manageability, judicial economy, or filing-fee concerns. Practitioner Takeaways: Section 378 joinder is construed liberally—a defendant’s common policy or practice causing harm to plaintiffs at different times/ locations can satisfy the “same transaction or occurrence” test without identical individual facts. Manageability, judicial economy, and filingfee shortfalls are not grounds for misjoinder under section 378; courts may only address them post-joinder (e.g., severed trials under section 379.5), and broader limits must come from the Legislature. A related case’s class-decertification findings don’t bind differently-represented individual plaintiffs from establishing proper joinder in followon suits. Federal Rule 21 has no California counterpart, so federal mass-joinder dismissals under Rule 21 carry little weight in section 378/379.5 analysis. (C.A. 1st, June 30, 2026.) n
Law firm website redesigns are rarely just website projects. There’s always more under the surface. From the outside, a website project can seem straightforward: hire a web agency, pick a design, update some content, and launch the new site. Easy peasy.
In reality, law firm website projects are often some of the most politically and operationally complicated initiatives a marketing team manages. And they can seem completely overwhelming because there are so many decisions and steps leading to a very public outcome. We once had a client practically in tears just thinking about the project ahead. However, like any big project, when you break it down into smaller parts, clearly define roles and responsibilities, and work with an agency team that has done this for decades, it becomes not only manageable but positive. Our previously overwhelmed client quickly fell into our project cadence and launched a very successful website.
Every law firm is different, but we see similar challenges again and again: competing opinions, practice group dynamics, endless content reviews, questions about branding, business development, SEO, recruiting, intake, technology, and budget. And somewhere in the middle of all that, the marketing team is trying to keep the project moving forward without losing momentum—or their sanity.
The disconnect is that attorneys and marketing teams are often looking at the website through completely different lenses. Attorneys may see the website as a branding exercise. Marketing teams are thinking about user experience, search visibility, lead generation, positioning, analytics, and longterm business development strategy.
Neither perspective is wrong. But when those priorities aren’t aligned early, website projects tend to stall.
Most Website Problems Start Before Design Begins
Consensus Culture Risks Gridlock Without Clear Ownership
Law firms are collaborative by nature, which works well in many situations, but website projects are not always one of them. As the saying goes, too many cooks in the kitchen spoil the broth.
When every stakeholder weighs in on every design decision, progress slows. Feedback becomes contradictory, minor
What Law Firm Marketing Teams Wish Attorneys Knew Before a Website Project Begins
by Rae Ritter
decisions turn into lengthy discussions, and the project can gradually become a collection of compromises rather than a strategic initiative.
That’s why one of the first questions we ask during discovery is how the firm plans to make decisions and who will be involved. Some firms haven’t considered that question before, but establishing a decision-making process early is critical to keeping the project moving.
The most successful website projects have clear ownership. Attorneys should absolutely provide input, but someone needs final decision-making authority. Otherwise, simple questions—like whether to have a navigation bar or hamburger menu on your homepage—can get stuck in endless discussion. The goal isn’t to limit collaboration. It’s to create a process where collaboration leads to decisions.
Redesigns Can Reveal Internal Misalignment
Before anyone sees a homepage concept, firms often have to answer harder questions:
• What are our priority practices?
• Who are we trying to reach?
• How do we describe ourselves?
• What actually makes us different?
That process can uncover inconsistent messaging, outdated positioning, or disagreements around strategy within the firm. The website design process does not create those problems, but it can surface them.
And yes, if it sounds like I am harping on the value of a thorough discovery phase in your website project, that just means you are listening. One of the most important outcomes of discovery is an approved list of project goals. Those goals become the North Star later, especially when opinions start flying, and decisions get harder.
Trust Between Attorneys and Marketing is Critical Marketing teams do a tremendous amount of behindthe-scenes work during a redesign. They’re coordinating stakeholders, managing approvals, balancing competing opinions, protecting timelines, and keeping the project focused on the firm’s goals. Having worked on in-house marketing teams at AmLaw 100 firms, I know firsthand how much of this work goes unnoticed.
Attorneys bring the legal expertise. Marketing brings a different perspective—business development, user experience, SEO, recruiting, analytics, and positioning. Neither works particularly well without the other.
That’s why trust matters. Attorneys need to trust that marketing’s recommendations are based on strategy, not personal preference. And marketing needs the credibility to guide difficult conversations when opinions inevitably differ.
The same is true for the agency. Firms should do their homework before selecting a website partner, but once the project begins, trust becomes essential. The strongest website projects happen when attorneys, marketing, and the agency respect each other’s expertise and stay focused on the same goal.
A Website Project Is a Business Development Project, Not Just a Design Exercise
One of the biggest challenges in law firm website projects is that people often reduce the conversation to aesthetics.
• Do we like the homepage?
• Should the photos be darker?
• Can we make the logo bigger?
But a high-impact modern law firm website has to do much more than look polished.
The Website Is Often a Firm’s First Impression
For many prospective clients, your website is your firm. Before someone speaks with an attorney, attends an event, or receives a proposal, they’ve probably already visited your website. In many cases, they’re making judgments about credibility within seconds.
A dated website creates assumptions—fair or unfair—about the firm itself. Today’s websites function more like digital offices than digital brochures. Clients expect clear information, intuitive navigation, mobile usability, and fast answers. And increasingly, they expect all of that immediately.
Marketing Teams Are Thinking About Conversion, Not Just Appearance
When marketing teams evaluate a website, they’re usually thinking about questions like:
• What are the relevant KPIs, and are we achieving our goals?
• Can users quickly find the right practice area?
• Is the intake process clear?
• Does the site perform well on mobile devices?
• Is the content structured properly for SEO and AI search?
• Are we guiding visitors toward meaningful next steps?
That’s a very different conversation from “Do we like this design?” A beautiful website that frustrates users or hides important information isn’t helping the firm grow.
“I Don’t Like It” Is Not Strategic Feedback
This is where projects often start drifting off course. Personal preferences matter, but subjective opinion is not the same as strategic decision-making.
Your website partner should be able to guide you from abstract comments such as:
• “I don’t like that image.”
• “Can we make this page look more like Firm X?”
• “I preferred the old homepage.”
Good feedback turns those instincts into informed, specific decisions based on your goals, not just your gut.”
Good website decisions should be grounded in:
• User behavior
• Analytics
• SEO strategy
• Conversion goals
• Content structure
• Usability
Individual feedback is critical, but it should reflect the firm’s personality and unique culture, not individual taste. As a result, projects move much more smoothly when firms separate subjective opinions from actual business objectives.
Good Legal Websites Require Attorneys to Participate Marketing teams cannot build strong legal websites in isolation. Attorney participation matters. A lot.
Marketing Cannot Invent Institutional Knowledge
Attorneys hold the insights clients actually care about:
• Common client concerns
• Recurring misconceptions
• Industry nuance
• Practical legal guidance
Marketing teams can shape and structure content strategically, but they can’t manufacture subject-matter expertise. The best law firm websites combine marketing strategy with real attorney insight.
A Website Project Should Capture Attorney Knowledge, Not Consume Attorney Time
Attorneys need to be involved in content, but that does not mean they are responsible for lifting that heavy load. One of the biggest misconceptions about website projects is that attorneys need to sit down and draft polished copy from scratch. That’s rarely the best approach.
In many cases, the strongest content comes from carefully guided attorney interviews, recorded discussions and meetings, and review of existing materials. A good marketing team or content partner can then synthesize those insights into website copy that is valuable to both human users and search engines.
Fast Responses Improve Outcomes
Momentum matters during website projects. But the business of a law firm continues. Trial dates remain on the calendar, real estate closings cannot be moved, and clients need answers. Your website partner needs to understand and plan for this in your project timeline so that the project does not stall.
When reviews, approvals, and feedback from attorneys and decision-makers happen promptly, timelines stay intact, costs remain predictable, and projects maintain strategic focus. Long delays create friction, increase revision cycles, and can lead to budget creep.
You Get the Website You Pay For
This is probably not the most fun part of the conversation, but it’s an important one. Law firm websites can be expensive. And when firms start reviewing proposals, there’s often a temptation to focus primarily on the lowest number. That’s understandable. Website projects are a significant investment, and budget pressure is real.
But website proposals are not always comparing the same thing. A lower-cost agency may be cutting corners in ways that aren’t immediately obvious during the proposal stage:
• Limited strategy and discovery work
• Templated designs
• Fewer rounds of design revisions
• Minimal SEO and AI-search planning
• Weak content support
• Limited or no content migration included
• Little accessibility consideration
• Outsourced development resulting in more issues in QA
• Rushed QA and testing
• Lack of long-term support
On the surface, two proposals may look similar. In reality, the process and final product can be very different. Unfortunately, many firms don’t realize what’s missing until the project is already underway—or worse, after launch.
Cheap Websites Often Become Expensive Later
One of the more frustrating situations is when firms try to save money upfront, only to end up rebuilding or heavily revising the website a few years later.
Sometimes the site looks dated quickly. Sometimes the backend is difficult to manage. Sometimes the SEO foundation was never properly built in the first place. Sometimes the website simply doesn’t perform. That usually leads to another redesign conversation much sooner than anyone expected. Ironically, trying to save money up front creates a greater expense in the long term.
If SEO Isn’t Guiding Your Strategy, You May Be Rebuilding Your Website Later
SEO (Search Engine Optimization) is still one of the most misunderstood parts of legal websites. One of the biggest mistakes firms make is treating it like something that gets added at the end.
Clients Search Differently Than Attorneys Think Attorneys naturally think in legal terminology. Clients usually don’t. They often use long-form lay terms in questions in both search engines and AI-powered search to find answers to their questions:
• “What happens after a data breach?”
• “Can I sue over a noncompete?”
• “How do I respond to an EEOC complaint?”
This matters to your website project because it should inform your content structure, your practice names, the information fields on your blog posts, your homepage messaging, and much more. Formal practice area names like Dram Shop, RICO, and ERISA may not be part of your target clients’ search terms, but if your target client is an in-house counsel, they may be searching with more nuanced legal terminology. In general, for SEO and AEO, it’s best not to rely on legal jargon.
Thought Leadership Should Be Part of the Website
Strategy
In 2026, thought leadership isn’t separate from the website anymore. It is part of SEO and your website strategy. Your attorneys’ thought leadership includes all of the content that they disseminate, whether online or in person—blogs, videos, podcasts, speaking engagements, continuing education presentations, practice area FAQs, recent case analyses, and even firm news and press releases. All these pieces should have a footprint online and contribute to your digital presence and authority for SEO and GEO purposes. How they appear on your website affects things.
Your website agency should guide the strategy regarding how your content is coded and categorized for your clients and targets—this may be topic, author, location, industry, or something else specific to the practice. When the content structure is optimized, creating human-friendly and SEO/ GEO-friendly thought leadership hubs will:
• Help your audience find key answers to their questions
• Answer the question: is this firm highly knowledgeable on this topic to help me with my legal issue
• Support content discovery and in-depth consumption of the thought leadership
• Be found in search engine results to drive traffic to your website
• Present clients with no click answers in AI queries that build credibility and authority, and also drive traffic to your website
Strong firms build resource centers, industry-focused content collections, and insight libraries to support SEO, AI search visibility, credibility, authority, and ultimately drive business development via their website content.
Modern Law Firm Websites Must Balance Branding With Usability
Law firms naturally care about branding because they want their brand and core differentiators to be known by their clients and prospective clients. They should. But usability matters just as much.
Copying Competitors Weakens Differentiation
It’s common for firms to reference competitor websites during redesigns. That can be helpful for inspiration—including ideas on what design elements to avoid! However, copying
competitors creates websites that feel interchangeable, which will not support business development or branding goals. At LISI, we drill down during the discovery phase on what is unique and different about a law firm and how that benefits its clients. Next, we look at how we can communicate that in a compelling way on the website to support engagement and conversions. The goal should never be to look like everyone else. It should be to communicate your firm’s strengths clearly and effectively.
Clients Care More About Clarity Than Cleverness
Most users are not looking for an award-winning creative experience. Instead, they want:
• Clear navigation
• Fast answers
• Attorney credibility
• An easy way to contact the firm
Overcomplicated navigation and overly clever messaging often create more friction than value. I use the example of renting a car at the airport. You want the wiper button, headlights, radio, etc., to be where you expect them to be. You don’t want to be fumbling for them while zooming down the interstate to your destination in the dark! Usability matters. Don’t make your website visitors pause and think: where do I find the blog posts—even if you think the navigational menu “Stuff We Think” is cute.
The Mobile Experience Is No Longer Optional
For many firms, mobile traffic now represents the majority of website visits. And yet mobile usability is still often treated as secondary during redesign discussions. A frustrating mobile experience creates intake friction immediately:
• Homepage imaging that does not wrap properly
• Forms that are hard to complete
• Poor navigation
• Unreadable bios
• Slow load times
That directly impacts user experience and conversion.
What the Most Successful Website Projects Have in Common
After working on enough law firm website projects, patterns emerge. The firms that have the smoothest projects are not necessarily the largest firms or the ones with the biggest budgets. More often than not, they’re the firms that have alignment from the beginning.
Leadership understands why the project matters, what success looks like, and how decisions will be made. Marketing has a seat at the table as a strategic advisor. Attorneys provide meaningful input, but there is a clear process for gathering feedback and moving forward.
Those firms also tend to stay focused on outcomes rather than personal preferences. Instead of debating whether they like a particular image or headline, they ask whether the website will
help attract better leads, strengthen the firm’s market position, improve recruiting, or create a better user experience.
Perhaps most importantly, they understand that a website project is not just about the website. It’s about supporting the firm’s broader business goals. When everyone is working toward that shared objective, decisions become easier, timelines move faster, and the final result is almost always better.
A Better Website Process, Built for Law Firms
You may be thinking that law firm website projects sound complicated. That’s because they are.
The good news is that most of the challenges we’ve discussed are predictable. After decades of working exclusively with law firms, we’ve seen the same obstacles emerge again and again. The difference is knowing how to navigate them before they become real project delays or even obstacles.
At LISI, our perspective is shaped by real law firm experience. Members of our team have worked in-house at large law firms and understand the realities of partnership structures, attorney feedback cycles, budget approvals, and internal politics. We know that launching a successful website is not just an IT or marketing initiative. It is a firm-wide business development project.
That starts with discovery. Before we talk about design, we help firms align around goals, decision-making processes, stakeholder involvement, and project expectations. Those conversations often determine the success of a project long before the first homepage concept is presented.
Then we keep moving forward. We’ve built a process that creates momentum. We help clients anticipate content bottlenecks, establish accountability, keep projects moving, and stay focused on business outcomes rather than personal preferences.
We apply our years of legal and digital marketing experience to design and development decisions. We know attorney bios and the homepage are the most-visited pages on a law firm’s website. We understand that clients, referral sources, and lateral hires need to easily locate attorney credentials, law schools, clerkships, and representative experience. By building strategic marketing advice into our design and development process, we can create a website that functions seamlessly and supports the firm’s goals and business development strategy.
The result is a website that not only looks good on launch day but also continues to support business development, recruiting, thought leadership, SEO, and firm growth for years to come. We plan for long-term growth.
Because ultimately, the goal isn’t just to build a website. It’s to build a website that helps the firm achieve its goals. n
For ten years Rae Ritter has been the Director of Client Service and Marketing at LISI, where she sits on the other side of the table—guiding law firm clients through strategic planning to convert website goals and ideas into high-performing, unique websites. Learn more at www.legalisi.com.
