Issuu

SEMESTER 2 | 2020

BACHELOR OF ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN DESIGN STUDIO BALLOTING POSTERS

THE CABINET OF CURIOSITIES In this studio students will undertake their own research into three contexts of a site adjacent to the Footscray Station. The first will be the cultural demographics of the area as it is understood today, the second will be the most recent 200 years of the site’s cultural history, and the third will be the site’s ancient cultural history. Based on this research, each student will be asked to make an abstract idea model in three dimensional virtual space. This abstract model, entitled ‘The Cabinet of Curiosities’ will be an exercise in generating architectural form and semiotics arising from found objects within the three contexts of the site. These abstract models will be presented in a group discussion format, and fine tuned over a period of weeks.

Mondays and Thursdays 2:00pm > 5:00pm

The abstract models will then added to incrementally so that ultimately they consist of a number of discreet abstract elements in the form of: four facades, a roof, an interior and a basement. The studio will then undertake research into known apartment building types, and plans and sections will be sourced. Based on a study of these, each student’s ‘Cabinet of Curiosities’ will then be incrementally transformed from an abstract architectural model, into a set of plans, sections and views of a schematic design for a residential building with basement car park and ground floor retail. Through this process, this studio seeks to link the prosaic and pragmatic constraints designing a functional and build-able scheme, with the ephemeral and intuitive process of making meaningful architectural languages in a specific local cultural context. Please click here to view the exhibition of the work from this design studio last semester.

Tutor: Dr Jan van Schaik: practicing architect at MvS Architects, a researcher and senior lecturer at RMIT Architecture & Urban Design, and a creative and cultural industries strategist at Future Tense. jan.vanschaik@rmit.edu.au

ANNA JANKOVIC

MON 6:00-9:00PM | THU 2:30-5:30PM

Before his death in 2004, artist Mutly Cerkez had developed a system for dating his artworks - where he included a future date in the artwork’s title to indicate when he would remake it in the future, although not necessarily in its original form. He thought about how value was attributed to particular art genres above others and the categorization of works as ‘minor or ‘major’ artworks. Through this he also challenged the idea whether a work of art should be resolved or complete or being of a singular point in time. In this way Cerkez disrupted the conventional linear timeline, both of individual works and his art practice. All works were considered of equal significance. Similarly, this studio too, will be remade. In this, we will not think of a building/architecture as a static, singular object, or being ‘of its time’ - but rather one that is accretive and in a constant state of flux - one that will be changed, adapted and re-built over time. This studio seeks to further ideas of the un-built (de-construction), in-progress (re-construction) and re-built (that is perpetually incomplete). Cerkez questioned many of the mythologies of art, including the necessity of an artwork to be original or unique. In his series of works titles ‘New album cover designs for bootleg recordings of Led Zeppelin’, he spoke of his discovery of bootleg recordings of Led Zeppelin concerts; the band were known for performing their songs differently at every concert; and Cerkez studied the variations between each. The nature of bootlegs meant that copyrights were never considered and so the same title would reappear over and over - and repackaged over and over; as bootlegger bootlegged bootlegger. As a series of works; the studio tasks will be composed as a ‘triptych’ of digital craft, history & architectural elements; by way of developing students’ understanding and exploration of fundamental elements that comprise a building. Like Cerkez’s own re-makes, or De Chirico’s ‘self-forgeries’ of his early paintings; Student will make and re-make, on a site in Melbourne’s CBD.

MAINTAINING BRUNSWICK

This is the third studio in a series that questions the effect of Gentrification and Design Districts in Brunswick.

Based on the Future Home Competition and Commerical Zone 3 we will interrogate Precedents from the 20th wick II - Police Garage Century and Industrial Archaeology to Thursday mine11the Final Presentations June 2020 6-9pm existing Typology Disciplinary Studio Guest Panelists and Urban estions the Mark Raggatt. Director. Brock Hogan. ication and Condition of Placemaking Brunswick ARM Architecture Strategist. RMIT Melbourne in Brunswick. Sessional Tutor UTS Innovationpotential. District. for design In the n extension wick campus same way Multi-housing has Brunswick It combines a allowed Architects, and urban Session 1 Guest Panelist strial Design, 6:00 Willie (Yi Xiong) Liew | Level 3 xtiles with an Alice Lewis Helen Duong | Tim Pyke designers to reimagine the ufacturing Associate Lecturer munity centre. Landscape Architecture RMIT 6:15 Tania Capovilla | Level 3 Monday 6-9pm | Thursday 3-6pm problems Campus of Studiotheir Leader society and 6:30 Klaus (Boren) Zheng | Level 4 s explore ideas city we will speculate6:45onBowen how Melbourne's inner city industrial neighbourhoods have transitioned from places of goods production, to places , efficiency, Li | Level 3 congestion, of creative production and eventually to potential development sites. This process has raised conflicts between Session 2 Guestdevelopments Panelist ion and new housing workers, migrant groups and creatives who practice their commerce in a contested place where developers wish ict and 7:00 Michael Marchetti | Level to 3 leverage large allotments, with no established vocal residential community in close proximity to the city for Millie Cattlin might Industry be good for maintaining laboration Fellow commercial gain. 7:15 Sienna Crook | Level 2 ity, flexibility, Interior Design RMIT nfastructure. employment, generating Campus Studio Leader 7:30 Rachelle Yeoh | Level 2 The state government’s new planning tool; Commercial Zone 3, attempts to mitigate these competing interests and alludes to a new hybrid type that combines light industrial and residential buildings. The potential for a ake theirdiverse cues neighbourhoods and 7:45 Yan Lan Wu | Level 5 “City-within-a-city” that celebrates the “Culture of Congestion” will be investigated through a close reading of ved urban Session 3 Guest Panelist the industrial fringe suburbs of Brunswick which are in varying states of gentrification and decline Brunswick deal with both the collective y and the James Jamison. Director. 8:00 Zeynep Birincioglu | Level 5 ne. Theseand the To understand the potential of this new typology, this studio aims to understand canonical multiple housing Niimorijamison Architects. experience individual local building 8:15 Luca Gambell | Level 3 projects of the Twentieth Century, particularly those that deal with the specificities of place and culture. When Sessional Tutor erial assembly, combined with a close reading and analysis of the peculiarities of site, mainly adaptation and small industrial of the Monash city.University stomisation, 8:30 Noah Jaffrey | Level 5

and spatial

RMIT School of Architecture & Urban Design Brunswick Design District

8:45

Katherine Ure | Level 3

9:00

Conclusion

buildings, we will propose what this new type of hybrid architecture proposed by Commercial Zone 3 could be and pose questions that challenge the divisions imposed between home and work, industrial and residential neighbourhoods.

Poster based on S. Giedion - A Decade of New Architecture (CIAM) - 1951 Images: Casa de la marina Jose Antonio Coderch. Lourve Balcony interiors and loggias based on Mediterranean shutter. Exterior. Small scale industiral building typology typical of Brunswick. Nearmap imagse of Brunswick Market. Melbourne Metropolitan Board of Works Survey of Brunswick 1918

| Hereditary

| Marc Gibson | 1:00pm - 4:00pm | Monday & Thursday | | Outline Hereditary centres around the idea of inheritance of formal qualities through iterative digital processes. The lineage of digital form bares trademarks of the toolsets that brought them into creation. Either the organizational spacing of one n-Body reacting to another or the topological rigidity of a tessellated mesh structure. The inherent formation of digital matter reveals its indexicality through phenotypic traits. This studio will explore the intentional subversion and curation of digital tools to create adventurous forms for 3D printing. Students will create, refine, and position a digital toolset that interfaces bottom up algorithmic generation of geometry and top down intervention through sculpting. During the first portion of the semester students will introduced the fundamentals of parametric logic, digital sculpting and 3d print optimization to produce a wide array of digital sculptures. The second half of the semester will see students design a curated sculpture park and architectural grotto. The weekly aggregation of objects will act as a taxonomy of formal characteristics that will be referred to when designing their architectural language. | Software No prior experience in ZBrush or Grasshopper required. | Evaluation Students will be assessed on their design, visual communication and comprehension of data structure to control layered parametric procedures. Individual folios are to be submitted at the conclusion of this subject.

| Core Techniques

| Topology Generation

| Develop Taxonomy of Sculptures

| Procedural Materials

| 3D Print Resolution

| Architectural PochĂŠ

| View Past Hereditary Elective Here

yirramboi

An Arts, Cultural & Treaty Centre

You will be asked to design an arts, cultural & treaty centre in the heart of Melbourne’s arts precinct. The design of Australian cities post colonization have failed to include Indigenous Australians voices, cultures and traditions within them. The studio examines a future Melbourne where the cultures and traditions of our First Nations people are made visible within our colonized city. The studio fits into a lineage of Australian architecture that is ideas based, figurative and pluralist and favours expressive forms.

Mondays & Thursdays 2-5pm

Led by Dr Christine Phillips & Stasinos Mantzis partnered with Aboriginal Boonwurrung Elder N’arwee’t Carolyn Briggs AM The studio will draw on a range of design techniques such as extrusion, subtraction and collage to tackle the following research questions: • • • • • • • •

Tackle the notion of a colonised country and how we might design a shared future architecture charged by multiple histories and different cultures To consider what Aboriginal sovereignty means within architecture To consider Aboriginal notions of Country within an urban context How to design a cultural building vertically on such a tight urban site. How can the history and culture of the site and its surrounds inform the design of the building? How can we engage with the urban surrounds and create links. How can we add to the current civic narrative of this Arts Precinct How might a better understanding of the importance of the site to the people of the Kulin Nation make us consider how this new civic building should be sited within the context of Melbourne as a colonial city?

ECOLOGIES FOR THE ENDANGERED The computational enclosure

TUTOR | CAITLYN PARRY TIMES | MONDAY + THURSDAYS 10am - 1pm This studio seeks to explore how generative design techniques can be used to encode ecologies for the endangered. How should future protective urban enclosures house Australias endangered species and how does the design of these sit amongst the ethics of animals in captivity. The Computational Enclosure is a partnered design studio with Zoos Victoria and keys together with the Working Dirty Masters Studio and Landscape Design Studio Student requirements | smart phone 2018 and older (needs to run AR app) no coding/gh/ zbrush experience is required but a willingness to learn them is important

RMIT Architecture Partnered Studio

Cemeteries inherently are governed by metrics and the utilitarian infrastructure that has been implemented in order to service, access and maintain the necropolis. Cemeteries are accompanied by various additional built programs such as the flower shop, crematorium, chapel, mortuary. With the introduction of assisted death legislation in Victoria in 2019, Greater Melbourne Cemetery Trust are now in the process of understanding how this might be accommodated within their remit. What is the infrastructure that would define this program? Fawkner Train Station opened in 1886. In 1906 Fawkner Cemetery opened absorbing into its site the train line and station. A train that provided for the transportation of coffins and mourners. A train station that serviced the city of the dead. The design studio is an extension of a masterâ€™s studio held in Semester 1 and will explore the role of the infrastructure that is required to support the cemetery and how this will be defined by the program of assisted death. This will be balanced with understanding the historical significance of the infrastructure that defines the mechanics of the necropolis and how this might this be exploited in order to define a new appendage to the cemetery. Students will be engaged with understanding the role of the masterplan, rigorous site, program and precedent analysis, reviewing the role of the cemetery and the infrastructure required to support it as a civic entity. Drawing, drawing, drawing. BA ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STUDIO S2 2020 MONDAY 6-9PM THURSDAY 2-5PM AMY MUIR

ASSIST II

ALTER

TO MAKE OTHER

Design Studio Leader: Brent Allpress Mondays and Thursdays 2.30-5.30 pm This studio investigates design questions involving practices of alteration, extension and addition. Many significant buildings constructed prior to the 1980â€™s have reached an age where they have needed to be renovated, refitted and otherwise altered or extended. This studio develops design strategies and responses to alteration and extension as a specific category of design practice activity. Modernist architectural theory resisted the additive and promoted the tabula rasa as a means to ensure the autonomy of the new original modernist work. Adding to and altering a modernist building presents an internal conflict and contradiction to be worked through. Ornament haunts architectural discourse and practice. Theories of the ornamental within the canon cross and interrupt the central texts of the architectural tradition, both constructing and dividing them with unresolved uncertainties. Modernist theory negated the supplementary role of applied ornament. Modernist practices however involved radical ornamental operations employing abstract spatial surfaces as semiautonomous systems. The representational role of ornament in contemporary architecture remains complex and contested. This studio provides a framework for investigating the complexities of the legacy of the Modernist prescription against the additive and the ornamental. It also provides an opportunity to reconsider and revise postmodern accounts of the role of ornament and the status of context. Recent nonstandard digital technologies that revise modernist economies of standardization also shift the debate on the role of figuration beyond representation and communication towards architectural actions. Precedent projects will be analysed involving alteration, extension and addition strategies. A specific local or international modernist architectural project will be selected as the site for a new alternation, extension or addition. Site selection will be negotiated. The design brief of this new architectural complex is to remotivate existing program and provide facilities for a proposed Institute of Architectural Design Research that includes an architectural archive, temporary and permanent exhibition spaces, an auditorium, workshop and designer in residence facilities, along with other program relevant to the specific situation. Counter compositional strategies will be explored. This Design Studio provides a vehicle for research into significant modernist architectural precedent, provoking a critical and creative design response that focuses on qualitative and performative operations and outcomes.

Landscape in the Landscape, Castlemaine July 2016 Richard Black

RMIT Bachelor Design Studio: Semester 2 > 2020. 2.30-5.30pm Monday and 6.00-9.00pm Thursdays

Rewilding Castlemaine As each year post-settlement in Australia grinds on, how should we conceive of our place in the landscape, of the continent we have claimed as our own: are we custodians, masters, brokers, servants – and what is its place in our world of thought?’ Nicolas Rothwell, ‘The Landscape Behind the Landscape’ Eric Rolls Memorial Lecture, National Library of Australia 22 October 2014

STUDIO AGENDA: it is these questions and more that frame the agenda of this studio. As architects how should we conceive of our place in the landscape and of the landscape itself? How should we respond to it, represent it and ultimately, what should we make in it – do in the landscape? What attitudes to the landscape do you bring and what new ones can be revealed and discovered? This agenda is positioned against a ubiquitous backdrop of digital and technological inventions that pervades architectural education and that risks casting questions of landscape as irrelevant. But nature, and landscape cannot be background, or other but must be essential to any questions for the future of urban development. For this practice, a buildings capacity to belong to a wider territory, is a given. This can also be considered as a relational condition, extending beyond the built context, to include ecological systems, cultural ideas, nature and the land – a form of urbanism, but one that is free of the conventions of seeing buildings as the only reference point. Research projects (as background to this studio) – have explored architectures engagement with context in projects that work from rural and city landscapes and in the context of the cultural and environmental and the need for continued and deeper engagement with Australia’s indigenous people. The reality of climate change has provoked a critical reflection on this practice, and demands an urgent rethink of our relationship to nature, in all its forms, and for its status in the architectural profession – and that design has a critical role to play, and that the essence of design knowledges and processes can assist in navigating a new relationship to nature whilst considering dramatic shifts of the traditional frameworks of what constitutes architecture. (excerpts from Veil of Isis, 2019 Anna Johnson and Richard Black) ISSUE: writer Robert Macfarlane tells us that the ‘idea of the Anthropocene repeatedly strikes us dumb. In the complexity of its structures and the range of its scales within time and space – from nanometric to the planetary, from picoseconds to aeons – the Anthropocene confronts us with huge challenges. How to interpret, or even refer to it? Its energies are interactive, its properties emergent and its structures withdrawn. We find speaking of the Anthropocene, even speaking in the Anthropocene, difficult. It is, perhaps best imagined as an epoch of loss – of species, places and people – for which we are seeking a language of grief and, even harder to find, a language of hope. (Macfarlane, Underland, p364) This studio explores this difficult territory as well as the implications for architecture and its design knowledges. What then might be a language of hope that can yield opportunities to rethink architecture in the age of the Anthropocene? Our research continues to focus on the role of nature, of how we/you relate to it, and it is through this lens that the studio is framed. Project work aims to build your awareness of nature - its entanglement with ideologies, culture and humanity then ultimately - how might this inform ways of conceiving and making architecture? REWILDING CASTLEMAINE: design of an urban building for Castlemaine (110kms north west of Melbourne’s CDB) responding to the communities housing crisis. It’s comprised of the following components: Living (Multiple Dwellings/Lofts etc) with an equal part Landscape (or rewilding). Rewilding refers to the gradual transformation of the street, architecture and urban public space – into a new type of urban situation – a meeting of architecture/nature - a critical reworking of building, garden, and landscape – into an urban ecology. Project: the syllabus is structured around two parts, the first a suite of esquisses for you to imagine the site and its relationship to the town, its landscape and territory – and how these are grounded within the architectural issues framing the studio, and then secondly, using this site knowledge to make a design proposal for an urban building in the civic precinct of Castlemaine: of equal parts Living + Landscape. The Hortus Conclusus - or enclosed/walled garden - as a type-form has persisted since the fifteenth century and will be a reference point throughout the second part of the semester – exploring it for its architectural, urbanistic and ecological potential with relevance to the studio agenda - an updating and transformation of this type-form into the present-day. You should expect to develop ways of working to imagine the site and its relationship to the town, its landscape, territory as well as opening this to cultural and architectural references – equally immersed in the real and the imaginary. Additionally, there will be collaborations with the Metamorphosis studio, led by Anna Johnson, and hopefully several site visits to Castlemaine later in the semester. RMIT Bachelor Design Studio: Semester 2> 2020. 2.30-5.30pm Monday and 6.00-9.00pmThursdays

Richard Black

RELIQUIAE

man statues, We loved the clean, white, powerful, purity of the Greco-Ro celebratory... until we saw them painted, gaudy and bold and bright and

â€œThe moments of nature and history do not disappear into each other, but break simultaneously for

al emerges as a sign out of each other and cross each other in such a way that what is natur sign for nature.â€? history, and history, where it appears most historical, appears as a

lost, In this studio you will be tasked with rediscovering the sometimes hidden, sometimesexits;

their entrances and tunnel networks that crisscross the Melbourne CBD: crafting both; finding connections determining the known/unknown and working through the mire of interact as you do; all between each other projects, moments where your projects may when you emerge from the culminating the in the moment of rupture. The rapture of rupture, solo, but students will be underground into a small commercial tower.Work will mostly be encouraged to work collaboratively, as much as is possible online.

Szyman & Laura y pm e il a B 0 - 9.30 aura .3 L 6 : , s y r a o d t Tu Thurs onday & Time: M

DE-URBAN Repairing the Waterways of the West, Melbourne Bachelor Design Studio, Sem 2-2020 Mondays, 10:00-16:00 Thursdays, 13:30-16:30 Intensive, starting Week 6 Tutors: Mauro Baracco and Imogen Fry

If read through the Latin suffix, the term De-Urban means: Around Urban. This same term – De-Urban – also intends to suggest design thinking and related actions involved with the act of ‘de-urbanize’ as taking the urban away – removing urban footprint and volume inappropriately located in ecologically sensitive areas. This studio is focussed on suburban precincts of Melbourne’s Western Volcanic Plains, with the aim to identify large scale directions for conservation, landscape links and amalgamation to then guide locations and large and small scale design strategies for building and infrastructure that will not inhibit the conservation, repair and functioning of these ecosystems. The studio projects will investigate areas that are part of the catchments of the Waterways of the West in Melbourne, including Werribee and Maribyrnong Rivers, and major tributaries such as Moonee Ponds Creek and other tributaries such as Stony, Kororoit, Lollypop, Laverton, Emu, Steele Creeks and Little River, amongst others. This design studio is part of a research project to be undertaken through 2020 and 2021 in partnership with community groups, gov bodies and other stakeholders. Students will acquire the following: - ability to think and design strategically - ability to understand, accurately map/represent and consider the surrounding contexts of projects sites as an essential key component of both design process and design proposals - ability to produce ideas and representations capable to trigger further discourse with various partners involved with the research project This studio is an extension of an ongoing research project (started in sem 1/2020 through design elective) on the urban and environmental regeneration of the Waterways of the West – a partnered project with The Waterways of the West Ministerial Advisory Committee (MAC) + LWCircus. This research project will be profiled and publicly presented at the Architecture Venice Biennale (Italian Pavilion) in 2021. The studio will start in wk 6 (from Monday 24 August). It will be run in a semi-intensive mode, on Mondays and Thursdays from wk 6 to wk 13 (included). Studio classes and reviews will be run also through the break week between Monday 31 August and Friday 4 September. Students will be working in groups.

PureArchitecture

The architecture of building research.; Diagnostic Buildings

Monday & Thursday Afternoon Lecturer; Peter Brew …every genuine artistic representation is in itself the universe – the universe in that specific form, and that specific form as the universe. In every word the poet writes, in every creation of his imagination lies the whole fate of mankind, all human hopes, illusion, grief, joy, greatness and misery, the entire drama of reality, which develops and grows upon itself for ever, suffering and rejoicing …Eco, A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomigton Indiana University press 1976 p 262 Inside and Outside (the shop window) John Brack 1972

Aectecture but also of the modern theatre; such as Neil Simon’s 1965 play; The Odd couple.

Our script might be something like”An archi-

tect is asked to set up a space to develop new models for teaching environments. (project 1) For now let us assume that this will be on the roof of RMIT building 45. In addition to this we are asked to design a research space for that project ( project 2). and spaces necessary for the construction and monitoring of project 1 ( Project 3) These will be the subject of an experiment in modelling and control of environments ( project 4). The brief will be situational , based on the equipment and tests or performance, it may be a combination of an office to simulate office, class or learning spaces , a lab to research how to design a learning space, a seminar room environment a domestic component or “generic spaces or environments based on what it.

What is envisaged:

One way buildings are being made to be more energy efficient is through the monitering of their use and the response to the dynamic occupation.. 20 years ago the environment was based on annual or at best seasonally , More recently it was feedback from return air now it is estimated by load calculation derived from occupant mobile phones Bluetooth connectivity. The capacity to advance test and model such technology is reliant on buildings designed in a way that they are able to be used as a test of the building . Tthe second half of the semester It is possible that we develop the project to being a model for a new City High school

The studio sets out to explore architectures subject and the subject in architecture. To do this I have imagine a situation; Where architecture causes and what causes architecture co habit the same space and time. The sharing of space and time is a formal problem of modern archit

It is possible that this infinitely recurring sequence( a nest of Russian dolls) can be constructed as an argument between the functional and programmatic requirements of each space. (content and form ) coincide with the alternation of object and subject to give us a way of thinking about architecture in ways beyond narrative and representation.

At first glance this might seem like an infinite recuring sequnce; like the image of the nurse on box of Droste milking chocolate, though I imagine it more to be a sequence that gathhers an argument between project i a sequnce, Whre form is maiantaned and content is constructed as int the Mise en abyme of Las Meninas painted by Diego Velázquez .

During this pandemic it seems appropriate to revisit Melbourne’s original Quarantine Station. Situated at the end of the Mornington Peninsula in the Point Nepean National Park, QUARANTINE will investigate the landscape, buildings, and structures in and around Melbourne’s original sanatorium, and propose new uses to what is currently underutilised land and infrastructure. inf Due to unexploded ordnance in some parts, Point Nepean has only quite recently been opened up to the general public. The many years of isolation have resulted in the preservation of this dramatic landscape. We will research the site from Bunurong times, through the sanatorium years where ships plagued by disease where quarantined; through to the defence systems set up against pirates during the Gold Rush; and on to the rst shot of the First World War. Stories of diseased early settlers, a litany of ship wrecks and the drowning of Australia’s 17th Prime Minister Harold Holt will be unpacked, researched, mapped, and recorded to uncover programmatic opportunities and propose new usages for the land.

Students will review the 2017 Master Plan commissioned by the State Government and being implemented by Parks Victoria. We will question the content and identify opportunities for new programmes and architectural intervention. The studio will focus on tectonics, materials, and buildability. Rather than conservation for conservation’s sake, students will be asked to consider active heritage conservation, involving the reuse and repurposing of existing buildings. building Students will also propose new infrastructure where architecture can respond to the landscape in a meaningful and useful way. The sensitive nature of the landscape and the history will be our driver, and eco-tourism will be the outcome. Due to the recent announcement of the second lockdown QUARANTINE studio will be conducted primarily online. Ideally we would visit the site which is located 1.5 hours from Melbourne. Students intending to particpate in this studio are highly encouraged to consider how they might visit the site in the event that Public Transport is not an option. Relevant Links https://www.parks.vic.gov.au/projects/point-nepean-master-plan

QUARANTINE Studio Time: Monday and Thursday from 6pm - 9pm Tutors: Rodney Eggleston and Julian Canterbury of MARCH Studio.

Increa e singly, the role of the public architect is engaged not only in the design of new civic buildings and spaces, but in the redesign and re r nova ation n of exissting ones. In the conttemporary city ad ada aptation, alteration and an d an annexatiton are essen ntia al too ool’ls in the arch ar chitecct’ts re repe perrtoi oire re.. At the e sam ame time m , the ro ole e of our ci civi vicc in inst s itu utions iss ch chan angi ging ng. The Pu ubl blic ic Librrary, in n particular, is unde erg rgoing signi iccan a t tran nsfo orma matiion o s in use e; ch chan ang ges rooted in fu fund ndam amen enttal sh shififts ts in n te tech chno olo logy gy,, informat ation and d cu cultltur ure e. Thi h s st studio o will lo look ok to exp plo l re these issue ues th thrrough h a se seri ries off arch hitectural intervention ons, s, addititio ions n and recongurations within the sit ite of the St State e Library of Victori ria, a, one of Melb lbo ourn rne’s ’ mo m st signicant civic inst stitut utio i ns.

Between 2017 and 2019 the State Library of Victoria undertook a major renovation, focusing primarily on the refurbishment of internal spaces. This studio will take on a more radi d cal and speculative brief for the library. Students will develop their own propositions for the State Library - proposin ng urban, a chitectural, and programmatic interventions ar into the existing building. The studio will exxplore the potenttial of such interventions to reim imagine the libr brar a y’s role in the city today. Throughout the semester students will closely Thro exam amin ine e th the exiisting i fabric of the libraryy, its hist storry, rel elat a ionship to the surrrounding city, and d th the rolle of th he library in con o temporary cultlture more bro roadly. These in investtig igations wililll

be the basis for a critical approach to design projects s, informing architectural techniques for the new additions and alterations. Students will also be required to develop an understanding of the history of the library as a specic architectural typolog gy, and to ne negotiate the complex considerations that come witith h working on a signicant public buililding. Att the same time e the studio wililll encourage experimentation with formal, urb r an and programmatic stratteg e ies in nte tend n ed e to reimagin ne the State Libraryy in i a morre op open n, diiverse an nd contem mporary for o m. Studio Leader: CONOR TODD Time 14.30 - 17.30 MON + THURS BARCH / INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS

Archipelago

Dale Schlosser + Michael Strack

Mondays + Thursdays 6pm - 9pm

This studio comprises:

Collins Place project

Small, medium, and urban design tasks Individual and paired work Critical situation of work in a publication-style outcome

The city of today is held in suspension: a series of rooms, spaces, programs & buildings held apart in perfect neutrality, their only connection a thin bluestone gruel. Our city is disconnected & discontinuous. Rather than bemoan the fact, this studio is interested in ďŹ nding ways to subvert or aggravate these conditions within our city.

The studio seeks to build upon the strengths of the body of work of the previous studio, Fabrication, conducting a series of operations testing and ultimately mounting a challenge against some of the logics of the Melbourne CBD.

the Machine

fake lab tutor_Jack Mansfield-Hung

INTENSIVE STUDIO_(weeks 2 through week 8)

mondays & thursdays_10am - 5pm

CLUSTER DEEP 06B: DREAM UNCANNY COMPOSITIONS MODELS MODEL: MODEL 45:GOTHIC GOTHICARCH ARCH

(style) The studio will take the position that â€˜styleâ€™ to buildings, is like DNA to living organisms. It contains a particular sequence of rules that when combined generate categorically accepted architectural outcomes. In this studio we will use style as a system to test machine generated reproductions for their potential to re-write accepted architectural codes, as we focus on the strange, anomalous, uncanny false-hoods that emerge from the copy.

Vitruvius, Alberti, Palladio & the Machine Book V

Task4 - Chapter II, The D

(post-truth architecture) What do alternative architectural facts look like in a profession that openly accepts and is built on a visual culture of copying? This studio is the third in a series, intent on delineating fakeness in the architectural discipline by utilising machine learning technologies as a collaborative design partner in order to reproduce the documentation of past stylistic periods (images, texts etc).

Vitruvius, Alberti, Palladio & the Machine Book V

-Short Section Model-

(studio structure) The semester will be broken into three phases; foundation, experimentation and implementation. The foundation phase will introduce students to the underpinning tools, methods, and research topics and will be explored in groups. In the experimentation phase students will take part in a highly iterative design processes, as they test a variety of design methods and digital tools through a series of esquisses completed as group work. In the implementation phase, students will work individually for the remainder of the semester as they apply these explorations to a medium scale cultural building, where they will be required to refine a particular design method that suits their individual design brief. No prior algorithmic experience is required. All you need is a willingness to learn them! f

IMAGES: a_Hyung Jin Moon & Grace Izinyon b_ Weiqi Xie, He Jun Zhang, Wai Hong Conrad Tse c_ Jin Kikuchi, Jonathan Antonello, Matte Howard d_ Marcus Hall, Peiyao Yu, Danny Kah Aik Tan e_Giovanni Battista Piranesi f_Jack Mansfield-Hung

BIRDS

RMIT architecture Bachelors design studio BRIDS frames the city as a texturally and materially rich subject that despite its assets, lacks a spatial framework in which to claim temporally significant sanctuary. The studio seeks to repair the web of time where it has broken, through architecture. BIRDS celebrates disorder, incongruity and uncertainty - but executed with surety, will and conviction. The studio is small to medium. The studio will plan and design a new building, and the archaeological remnants on which it's built. BIRDS has these objectives: Create documents that chart a sympathetically fabricated history of facts for the site. Create a strong narrative understanding of your work which allows confident navigation through the studio material. Design an architectural response to the physical and folio based sites that negotiates those two conditions with aplomb. BIRDS focuses on non-architectural sources for precedent and content. They typically include: theatre, film, music, writing, painting, history and archaeology. These may be real or imagined. BIRDS is structured around weekly exercises that move quickly across material, iterating furiously. Work is predominantly individual.

peter knight monday + Thursday 18:00