International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering Research ISSN 2348-7607 (Online) Vol. 8, Issue 1, pp: (105-116), Month: April 2020 - September 2020, Available at: www.researchpublish.com
Integration of Design Optimality and Design Quality of RC buildings from the perspective of Value Engineering Ayman Abd-Elhamed1,2, Haytham Essam Amin2, Ahmed Mohamed Abdelalim3 1
Faculty of Engineering at Mataria, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt.
2
Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Egyptian Chinese University Email: aymanm79@hotmail.com Email: Haytham.essam95@gmail.com
3
Associate Professor of Construction Management, Faculty of Engineering at Mataria, Helwan University. Email: Dr.Ahmedabdelalim@m-eng.helwan.edu.eg
Abstract: Design Optimality of RC Buildings “that merges the perspective of design and construction” is a goal for each designer. This paper aims to compare between different structural systems that are commonly used as Lateral Force-Resisting Systems (LFRS) and choose the optimum structural system for each height and aspect ratio under the action of gravity and earthquake loads from the perspective of value engineering. This paper proposes three different feasible solutions for the selection of the LFRS and quantifies the impact of these selections on seismic performance and quality. The systems considered are: Rigid Frame, Core and Shear Wall and Tube in Tube. Moreover, applying value engineering approach on the solutions by considering two parameters: the design optimality index and design quality index. The design phase is considered one of the most important phases in the life cycle of a project. The coordination between designer and construction team should be insured to increase the building quality. So, improving the design phase by considering design quality to remain the project performance as well as time and cost saving. In this study, linear dynamic analyses of ten, twenty and thirty-story RC structures, which are primarily designed according to UBC 97, are performed. The results of the numerical simulations of dynamic linear responses were presented. Also results of design quality index were indicated. The recommendations for chosen the optimum structural system were based on the structure performance, maximum story drift, maximum displacement, and design quality indicators. Keywords: Design Optimality; Design Quality; Design Quality Indicator; Tall buildings; structural systems.
I. INTRODUCTION Integration of different knowledge areas in construction is the effective way to have the optimum structural system and reaching optimum solutions for execution during construction. Choosing the structural system is essential stage that defines all the project. As known, the best time to implement the value engineering should be considered from preliminary design, because of the cost of design is the lowest for the whole project stages but it‟s impact in the construction is very large, and it will effect on raising the quality of all works besides decreasing the cost and time for the construction stage. Value Engineering (VE) is an organized approach used to analyse the function of systems, equipment, facilities, and supplies for achieving their essential functions at the lowest life cycle cost consistent with required performance, quality, and safety [1,2]. The implementation of the VE process increases the project performance, quality, safety, durability, and effectiveness. It is essential that the design should satisfy specific code requirements such as the Uniform Building Code or any local building regulations.
Page | 105 Research Publish Journals