Future of Rail: Investment – A UKREiiF Fringe Event Contents Key Takeaways
1
Why Private Investment Matters
1-2
Thinking Beyond the Railway
2
The Mutual Investment Model (MIM): A Promising Alternative
3
Matching the Model to the Scheme
3
The Infrastructure Pipeline: From Passive to Proactive
3-4
Devolution: Changing the Relationship Between Centre and Region 4
Key Takeaways: 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Reframe private investment as a strategic tool, not a last resort: Government must be clear from the outset what risk is being bought and what value it unlocks, not treat private finance as a fallback when public funding runs out. Look beyond the railway boundary to create investable propositions: Rail's greatest untapped potential lies in dual-use infrastructure, energy, connectivity and placemaking; these are the opportunities that will attract serious private capital. Adopt the Mutual Investment Model as a mainstream option for UK rail: Wales has proven this works. A capped return, a public equity stake, and genuine transparency offer a credible, less rigid alternative to PFI that Treasury should now get behind. Match the model to the scheme – and resist the temptation to standardise: There is no one-size-fits-all solution. The priority must be finding the right structure for each project and being ruthlessly clear about who holds which risks and why. Stop waiting for investors to come to you: The pipeline must become a proactive prospectus. Government should be sitting down with investors from day one, offering clarity on opportunities, certainty on decisions, and a clear front door. Give regions the decision-making power to match their investment responsibilities: DfT should focus on the 'how', not the 'what'. With local coinvestment requirements rising sharply under TCR, devolved authorities need genuine autonomy to attract and deploy capital at scale.
Why Private Investment Matters The core argument was one of fiscal constraint – the public sector simply cannot fund everything it needs. Beyond the cost of capital, participants stressed that what government is really purchasing through private finance is risk transfer, and that this distinction is critical from the outset of any scheme.
1/5