Issuu

AUG/SEPT 2026 ISSUE 133

20 Mandatory Product Stewardship 32 Industry’s fuel crisis 40 Annual Consultants’ Directory

Understanding air emissions from modern WtE plants By Dr Nathan Weber Understanding and collecting data is as important as collecting waste streams. Image: tadamichi/shutterstock.com

experts from government, industry and consulting explored how policy, economics and community expectations are shaping the future of resource recovery. While the discussion touched on topics ranging from container deposit schemes to energyfrom-waste and soft plastics recycling, a common theme emerged: success depends on collaboration, certainty and long-term planning. The panel included Preet Brar, Executive GM EfW and major projects, Cleanaway; Tony Chappel, CEO of NSW EPA; Tony Circelli, head of Recycling Victoria; Carmen Loecherer, COO Resource Recovery, Veolia Australia and New Zealand; and Rod Carr, director, Marsden Jacob Associates. Their discussion highlighted the complexity of balancing government priorities, community expectations and commercial realities while building the infrastructure needed to support a circular economy.

Waste-to-energy (WtE) has become an increasingly important topic in Australia as governments seek to reduce landfill, recover resources and generate energy from residual waste. With the Kwinana Waste-to-Energy plant now operating and several additional facilities proposed, interest in the role of WtE within Australia’s waste management system continues to grow. Whenever a new Waste-to-energy facility is proposed, several questions inevitably arise: Is it better than landfill? How much energy can it produce? And perhaps most importantly, what are the impacts on air quality? While the first two questions are central to the economic and environmental case for WtE, concerns surrounding air emissions often have the greatest influence on community acceptance. These concerns are understandable. Early generations of thermal treatment technologies were associated with pollutants such as dioxins, acid gases and nitrogen oxides (NOx), leading to public concern. However, modern waste-to-energy facilities are fundamentally different. Advances in combustion design, air pollution control systems and emissions monitoring have substantially reduced hazardous emissions. The key question is no longer whether waste-to-energy produces emissions (as every combustion process does), but whether those emissions can be effectively controlled to protect human health and the environment.

(Continued on page 6)

(Continued on page 12)

Navigating uncertainty in resource recovery investment By Inside Waste

PP: 100024538

ISSN 1837-5618

As governments across Australia still try to invest in resource recovery infrastructure and develop new regulatory frameworks, the waste and recycling sector is navigating a period of change. Funding support, ambitious targets and evolving policy settings have created opportunities, but industry leaders say infrastructure investment alone will not solve the sector’s challenges. Not only that, but government policies at all levels make companies that would otherwise invest in infrastructure baulk at the idea due to uncertainty. This uncertainty is driven by many things, including long wait times for approvals, politicians who are unwilling to look at evidence-based cases and are instead swayed by political fallout that might occur due to those with unsubstantiated agendas, and the lack of education around how some of these facilities affect the environment. During a panel discussion moderated by Garth Lamb at the Waste 2026 Conference in Coffs Harbour in May,

Editor’s Note //

The reality of EfW air emissions Sometimes it’s hard to get your head around technology. For those of us who are less scientifically minded, we sometimes look at the latest piece of kit, or sensor, or machine and can’t make head nor tail of how it works. This is how it feels when talking to people about energy from waste facilities. There are those who like the idea of safely disposing of residual waste, while at the same time creating another source of energy that can be utilised by the public at large. However, with naysayers, it is a harder sell. Especially if they already have their mind made up in terms of what the technology supposedly is capable of, even if there is no evidence to support that point of view. And while there is nothing that can usually be done to change their mind, it is nice now and again to talk to somebody who has spent time researching the technology. Which brings me to a piece that we are running in this issue written by someone who might know something about such things – Dr Nathan Weber from the University of Technology Sydney. Chief Executive Officer Christine Clancy christine.clancy@primecreative.com.au Managing Editor Mike Wheeler mike.wheeler@primecreative.com.au Brand Manager Chelsea Daniel chelsea.daniel@primecreative.com.au Designer Laura Drinkwater Client Success Manager Ben Sammartino ben.sammartino@primecreative.com.au

Head Office Prime Creative Pty Ltd 379 Docklands Drive Docklands VIC 3008 Australia p: +61 3 9690 8766 info@primecreative.com.au www.insidewaste.com.au

Amongst other things, his research focuses on thermal treatment technologies and emerging contaminants. It makes interesting reading when looking into one of the key planks that upset those who hate the idea of energy from waste technology – emissions. In his article he offers up his thoughts, and research, on what the research actually says, not what some think it says. On another note, one of regular contributors Mike Ritchie has some interesting things to say about EPR, or product stewardship as some call it. He makes it clear what is needed for the 100+ schemes to work efficiently and be much better – make them compulsory. Agree or disagree? He makes some compelling arguments, especially when those with the highest recovery rates are the ones that are mandatory. Finally, the Waste Innovation and Recycling Awards’ nominations are open now. Don’t forget to enter your company or person that is deserving of such recognition. Articles All articles submitted for publication become the property of the publisher. The Editor reserves the right to adjust any article to conform with the magazine format.

Subscriptions +61 3 9690 8766 subscriptions@primecreative.com.au Inside Waste is available by subscription from the publisher. The rights of refusal are reserved by the publisher

The Editor welcomes contributions but reserves the right to accept or reject any material. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of information, Prime Creative Media will not accept responsibility for errors or omissions or for any consequences arising from reliance on information published. The opinions expressed in Inside Waste are not necessarily the opinions of, or endorsed by the publisher unless otherwise stated.

All material in Inside Waste is copyright and no part may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic or mechanical including information and retrieval systems) without written permission of the publisher.

From Gatehouse to Dashboard

Waste Data Done Right

Capture real-time data Easy reporting via customisable dashboards Seamlessly manage tip passes Works in offline environments

Get Started with Cooee Today! solutions@cooeedata.com 4 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEP 2026

“Cooee has allowed the Shire to enhance their understanding of the material being processed at the landfill site. The software has improved the recovery of gate fees and record keeping with immediate analysis of waste data. The team from Cooee developed the software to suit the Shire’s waste facility and has made the reporting more efficient and stress-free.” — Rikki Pulfer, Shire of Waroona

www.cooeedata.com

0447 393 363

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

Infrastructure Investment //

Navigating uncertainty in resource recovery investment (Continued from the Cover)

Learning through reform and collaboration Several panellists reflected on the role that long-term policy reform has played in driving some of the more positive environmental outcomes. Container deposit schemes were repeatedly referenced as an example of how persistence, collaboration and policy leadership can produce lasting change. While Australia’s federation can create complexity, the panellists argued that it also enables states to test ideas, learn from one another and strengthen national approaches. Circelli said the resource recovery sector often requires patience and resilience to achieve meaningful reform. “Anyone that works in this space recognises that to get anything done in this field requires a lot of perseverance, a lot of patience, a hell of a lot of resilience,” he said. He said states and territories have often collaborated closely behind the scenes, sharing ideas and intellectual property to accelerate progress. Chappel agreed that while differences between jurisdictions can be frustrating, they can also create opportunities for leadership and innovation. “I think what we don’t talk about enough is the positives, and then the opportunity now to harness those positives to really deliver accelerated, nationally aligned reform,” he said. The panel pointed to growing efforts to improve national consistency, particularly as governments seek to align regulatory approaches and product stewardship frameworks. While they agreed no

single government can solve every challenge alone, there was a suggestion that there is increasing recognition that resource recovery outcomes depend on cooperation across all levels of government. Carr said collaboration remains one of the most important ingredients for progress. “If we’re going to do anything in this space, there’s still lots of opportunities out there,” he said.

The challenge of making investment decisions Although governments continue to provide grants and funding opportunities, industry leaders said infrastructure investment decisions are becoming increasingly difficult in an environment characterised by uncertainty. Large-scale resource recovery facilities require substantial capital commitments, often involving hundreds of millions of dollars and lengthy development timeframes. Industry proponents must assess policy settings, feedstock availability, community attitudes, planning pathways and future market conditions before making investment decisions. Brar said infrastructure projects often involve multiple factors that must align before they become commercially viable. Drawing on Cleanaway’s experience developing energy-from-waste projects across the eastern seaboard, she explained that while the desired outcomes may be similar across jurisdictions, the policy mechanisms used to achieve those outcomes often differ. “What the regulators and the policy makers are rightly concerned about is ensuring that energy-from-

waste is a solution for residual waste, which is after recycling and recovery,” she said. Those differences can create additional complexity for organisations operating across multiple states. Loecherer said one of the biggest challenges facing industry is the lack of long-term certainty around policy settings. She argued that investors are generally willing to accept commercial risk, but frequent policy changes can undermine confidence and delay investment. She said that developing major infrastructure can take five to 10 years, making policy stability essential for long-term planning. “It’s a lot harder to get these infrastructure projects up and running,” she said. “We might start something, but it just gets cancelled because the policy gets changed. We need some maturity around policy, and we need to change the planning pathway. It takes way too long to get these things approved without any guarantee at the end. We’ve invested a lot of resources. It’s not just about the cost; it’s about allocating people that could be doing other projects. You spend four years on a project and then for some reason it might get cancelled, so we’ve just wasted four years of work. And then we get challenged from councils asking, ‘why aren’t you doing anything?’ with regards to building infrastructure. Well, we are trying but we need to change the way that waste infrastructure is approved in New South Wales because it’s not working.” She said long-term certainty around levies and policy settings would improve industry confidence and support infrastructure development. “We need some real, clear policy changes, and then commitment – whether it’s in New South Wales, or across the nation, it needs to be done,” she said. “Because we’ve all seen where waste is going over the border due to the levies being at a different rate or policies are different. Even in my new role now coming out of New South Wales and stepping into the other states, I was just gobsmacked with some of the things that can happen. We’re all one country. Why is it so different? Why are we making it so hard for ourselves?” The challenge is amplified by rising construction costs, evolving technologies and shifting market conditions. For many businesses, determining where and when to invest has become just as important as deciding what infrastructure to build.

Social licence and community expectations

Large-scale resource recovery facilities require substantial capital commitments. Image: IngeBlessas/ shutterstock.com

6 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEP 2026

The discussion also highlighted the growing influence of community expectations on project delivery. Whether developing energy-from-waste facilities, organics processing plants or other infrastructure, obtaining social licence has become a critical component of project success. Loecherer said access to information has fundamentally changed how communities engage with projects. Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

Part of the EcoCycle Group

WE KNOW LOCAL GOVERNMENT WASTE Specialists in: • Resource recovery infrastructure • Procurement of all things waste • Landfill gas • Landfill closure and rehabilitation • Financial analysis and governance • Grant applications • Project delivery support Working with Rural | Regional | Metropolitan

Pre-Qualified Supplier

t 07 3820 9768 m 0429 441 834 e admin@ethosresources.com.au w ethosresources.com.au Ethos Resources_Inside Waste Ad_Art03.indd 1

10/7/2026 8:21 am

6 8:21 am

// Infrastructure Investment

More money from levies needs to go back into the recycling/waste industry to help build infrastructure. Image: kamitana/ shutterstock.com

“People have access to a lot of data and not all of it is accurate,” she said. “Project proponents need to focus on communicating information in ways that are meaningful and accessible to local communities. It’s putting yourself in the community’s position.” Veolia’s approach has involved face-to-face engagement, including community meetings, conversations with local residents and efforts to understand specific concerns before responding with technical information. “Actually, coming out, sitting down, listening to the community concerns, and then responding with data that’s understandable and that’s relevant to their concerns,” said Loecherer. Brar said effective engagement requires both transparency and persistence. “You have to keep showing up in the community and be ready to answer those questions,” she said. “I get that community scepticism is often understandable, particularly when new technologies are introduced, but project proponents must be willing to openly discuss risks and impacts while ensuring information remains evidence-based. “What you will get from the project proponents that are sitting up here, and I can talk on behalf of the industry, is always fact-based information.” From a regulatory perspective, Chappel said governments must balance environmental protection, economic outcomes and community concerns. He said that social licence issues extend beyond the waste sector and are increasingly common across infrastructure developments. The panellists agreed that while technical evidence remains important, trust and communication are often just as critical in securing project approval and long-term community support.

Data, evidence and better decision making A recurring theme throughout the discussion was the importance of data in shaping policy and investment decisions. While industry and government have access to increasing amounts of information, the panellists suggested that collecting data is only part of Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

“We might start something, but it just gets cancelled because the policy gets changed. We need some maturity around policy.”

NO DOWNTIME FLOORING Heavy duty floor topping & repair system for waste handling sites

NO NO DOWNTIME DOWNTIME FLOORING FLOORING Heavy Heavyduty dutyfloor floortopping topping&&repair repair system systemfor forwaste wastehandling handlingsites sites • Leachate Resistant >>Leachate Leachate Resistant Resistant • Industrial Strength >>Industrial IndustrialStrength Strength >High HighImpact Impact Rating Rating • High>Impact Rating >>Rapid RapidCure CureTimes Times • Rapid Cure Times >>Joint JointRepairs Repairs • Joint Repairs Call usfor for more moreinformation information CallCall usus for more information

02 8840 8888 02 028840 88408888 8888 enquiries@ascoatings.com.au enquiries@ascoatings.com.au enquiries@ascoatings.com.au | | www.ascoatings.com.au www.ascoatings.com.au www.ascoatings.com.au AUG/SEP 2026 INSIDEWASTE 9

Infrastructure Investment //

the challenge. Understanding, interpreting and communicating that information effectively is equally important. Carr stated that better data collection could improve decision making across the sector. “I look at the waste sector, and I look at other essential service sectors, and I think there’s actually a real opportunity to reform how we collect data,” he said. “Information gaps continue to create challenges for both government and industry. There’s information asymmetries everywhere in this sector.” According to Carr, uncertainty can contribute directly to community concern and project opposition. Information sharing is a two-way street. “Government is reliant on industry to be reporting information and data, but the industry is equally reliant on government in terms of their reporting,” he said. Data also plays a crucial role in determining policy priorities and funding allocations. Carr said governments assessing grant applications must balance economic, environmental and financial considerations while ensuring public money is invested responsibly. Successful projects, he argued, are often those that clearly communicate long-term benefits. That includes demonstrating economic viability, job creation,

environmental benefits and broader contributions to resource recovery outcomes. “Government is incredibly nervous about white elephants,” he said. The discussion highlighted that evidence-based decision making remains central to both public policy and private investment, but data alone is rarely sufficient without effective communication and long-term vision.

Building confidence for future outcomes While the panel acknowledged there are challenges, there was also optimism about the sector’s future. Discussions around energy-from-waste, plastics recycling and infrastructure planning all reinforced the importance of creating policy settings that encourage investment while maintaining environmental standards. Chappel acknowledged the importance of providing certainty while maintaining high standards. “We’ll always seek harmonisation, but we also won’t compromise on the standard and the ultimate outcome if we think it’s achievable,” he said. Brar pointed to the importance of coordinated planning, particularly when developing major infrastructure precincts and securing long-term

Gunnedah Quarry Products Pty Ltd convicted of breaching condition of environment protection licence

feedstock arrangements. She said delays create challenges for everyone involved, increasing costs, creating uncertainty and slowing progress toward improved resource recovery outcomes. “No one wins,” she said. Circelli highlighted the value of long-term infrastructure planning, particularly as populations grow and waste streams evolve. That forward-looking approach, combined with stronger collaboration and more consistent policy settings, was repeatedly identified as a pathway toward better outcomes. Ultimately, the discussion suggested that while government funding remains important, infrastructure investment alone will not deliver the circular economy ambitions shared by industry and government. Long-term success will depend on policy certainty, effective planning, meaningful community engagement and collaboration across jurisdictions. As the resource recovery sector continues to evolve, the challenge is no longer simply building infrastructure. It is creating the regulatory, economic and social conditions that allow that infrastructure to deliver lasting environmental and economic benefits without governments overstepping their bounds, while making sure projects can be delivered in a timely manner and meet Australia’s needs.

Container deposit schemes are an example of how collaboration and leadership can produce lasting change. Image: Daria Nipot/shutterstock.com

On 4 May 2026, Gunnedah Quarry Products pty Ltd (GQP) was convicted in the Local Court of NSW at Gunnedah of one offence of contravening a condition of Environment Protection Licence No. 20262 (Licence), contrary to section 64(1) of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (NSW). On 15 December 2024, there was a large fire at the landfill owned by GQP located “Burleith” - Marys Mount Quarry, 334 Pownall Road, Mullaley NSW 2379. In response to the fire, the Environment Protection Authority (EPA) inspected the Premises and officers observed that GQP had placed waste in Cell 2, contrary to condition L3.8 of the Licence. GQP was not authorised to place waste in Cell 2 as the EPA had not yet approved an engineering construction report for Cell 2. GQP was convicted of contravening condition L3.8 of the Licence and ordered to pay a total of $52,000 and to publish this notice in the Waste Management Review at its expense.

10 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEP 2026

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

Waste To Energy //

Modern waste-to-energy facilities employ multiple layers of emissions control rather than relying on a single treatment process. Image: Richard OD/shutterstock.com

Understanding WtE emissions (Continued from the Cover) WASTE-TO-ENERGY IS FAR FROM A NEW TECHNOLOGY. Hundreds of facilities have operated across Europe and the United States for decades, producing electricity and, in many cases, supplying heat or industrial steam from residual waste streams. This extensive operational history has led to wellestablished emissions standards, including the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources (40 CFR Part 60) and European emissions requirements for waste incineration. Dr Nathan Weber

Image: Nathan Weber

12 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEP 2026

These frameworks have helped drive continual improvements in combustion design, air pollution control technologies and emissions monitoring, providing valuable experience that newer facilities can build upon. When discussing emissions, it is useful to first consider everything that leaves a waste-to-energy facility. There are three principal output streams: solid residues, liquid streams and treated flue gas, or air emissions. Solid residues include bottom ash discharged from the furnace together with air pollution control (APC) residues. This includes substances such as fine particulate matter captured by baghouse filters and spent sorbents used to remove acid gases and other contaminants. Depending on the facility design, wastewater may also be generated from wet scrubbers or other treatment processes. Unlike air emissions, these solid and liquid streams remain within the site’s management system, allowing them to be routinely sampled, characterised and managed before recycling, treatment or disposal in accordance with licence and regulatory requirements. Air emissions are different. Once treated flue gas exits the stack, it enters the atmosphere and therefore receives the greatest public attention and regulatory scrutiny. For this reason, modern waste-to-energy facilities employ multiple layers of emissions control rather than relying on a single treatment process. No single pollution control technology removes every pollutant. Instead, modern facilities combine optimised combustion,

flue gas cleaning, and emissions monitoring, with each stage targeting different contaminants. The first barrier is the combustion process itself. Combustion conditions are controlled to maximise the destruction of organic compounds through the “three Ts” of combustion: temperature, turbulence and time. In simple terms, the waste must be hot enough, well mixed with oxygen, and remain at elevated temperatures for long enough, to support complete combustion and minimise the formation of products of incomplete combustion. The second barrier is the air pollution control system. Depending on the facility design, this may include baghouse filters to capture dust, sorbents such as lime or sodium bicarbonate to neutralise acid gases, activated carbon to adsorb heavy metals and trace organic pollutants, and selective non-catalytic or catalytic reduction systems to reduce nitrogen oxides (NOx). Together, these treatment stages substantially reduce pollutant concentrations before the treated flue gas reaches the stack. The final barrier is emissions monitoring. Continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS) are commonly used for pollutants including nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), total organic carbon (TOC), hydrogen chloride (HCl), hydrogen fluoride (HF) and dust, or total particulate matter. These systems provide operators with real-time information on plant performance, while periodic stack testing is undertaken using recognised methods. These Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

AI VISION INTELLIGENCE FOR MATERIAL RECOVERY

VISION

SEE

WHERE

VALUE

LOST

materials-intelligence.oscorpenergy.com.au

MATERIALS INTELLIGENCE — LIVE MATERIAL FLOW

LIVE

CENTRAL PORTAL

ani@oscorpenergy.com.au P

0452 561 726

www.oscorpenergy.com.au

Waste To Energy //

Conceptual illustration of waste-to-energy outputs and emissions control processes. Image: Illustration prepared by the author with assistance from OpenAI ChatGPT.

methods include those developed by the US EPA and European standards for pollutants that cannot be readily monitored continuously, including heavy metals, dioxins and furans. Stack sampling methods and laboratory analytical techniques have also improved our ability to characterise emissions. Lower detection limits and increasingly sensitive instrumentation now allow contaminants to be measured at concentrations that were previously difficult or impossible to quantify. These advances have strengthened emissions assessments, improved environmental reporting, and enabled researchers to investigate emerging contaminants with greater confidence. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is another important emission from waste-to-energy facilities because it is produced whenever carbon-containing materials are combusted. Unlike pollutants such as NOx, acid gases or dioxins, CO2 is not removed by conventional air pollution control systems because it is a greenhouse gas rather than a toxic air pollutant. Instead, CO2 emissions are typically monitored, reported and incorporated into greenhouse gas accounting frameworks. The overall climate impact of waste-to-energy depends on several factors, including the composition of the waste, the energy recovered, and the extent to which landfill methane emissions and fossil fuel energy generation are displaced. While conventional pollutants remain the primary focus of environmental monitoring, the list of contaminants of interest continues to evolve as scientific understanding improves. One emerging example is per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). These highly persistent fluorinated compounds have become a global environmental concern and are now being investigated across many industries, including thermal treatment. Unlike many conventional organic pollutants, some PFAS require higher temperatures to achieve complete mineralisation to CO2, water and hydrogen fluoride (HF). 14 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEP 2026

Some studies of modern waste-to-energy facilities have reported that PFAS are more frequently detected in solid residues and wastewater than in stack emissions, reflecting both the effectiveness of combustion and the role of downstream air pollution control systems. Nevertheless, PFAS remains an active area of international research as scientists continue to

improve our understanding of their behaviour during thermal treatment and identify the most appropriate monitoring approaches. Importantly, PFAS research has also influenced how thermal treatment technologies are assessed more broadly. Historically, thermal treatment studies and regulatory approval processes largely focused on demonstrating destruction and removal efficiency (DRE). More recently, there has been a shift towards characterising contaminants across all output streams including stack emissions, solid residues and wastewater to better understand contaminant transformation and overall environmental performance. This whole-ofsystem approach provides greater confidence that contaminants are either destroyed, transformed or captured within managed waste streams. This highlights an important point: environmental management is not static. As new contaminants emerge and analytical capabilities improve, monitoring programs and treatment technologies must continue to evolve alongside them. Future monitoring strategies may extend beyond measuring individual compounds to include broader indicators, such as total fluorine, helping to provide a more complete understanding of contaminant fate throughout the waste-toenergy process. As mentioned at the top of this article, modern waste-to-energy facilities bear little resemblance to the incinerators of several decades ago. Advances in combustion engineering, flue gas treatment and emissions monitoring have fundamentally changed how these facilities Today’s waste-to-energy facilities bear little resemblance to the incinerators of several decades ago. Image: Peter John Hewitson/shutterstock.com

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

// Waste To Energy

operate. Continued research will play an important role in the future of waste-to-energy. As new contaminants emerge and analytical capabilities improve, research provides the evidence needed to refine combustion systems, develop improved monitoring techniques, better understand how contaminants transform during thermal treatment, and continually improve the environmental performance of these facilities. Australia is home to internationally recognised expertise in thermal treatment, emissions monitoring and environmental chemistry, placing it in a strong position to contribute to the next generation of waste-to-energy technologies. Greater transparency, including making research findings and emissions data accessible where appropriate, can further build community confidence and encourage informed, evidencebased discussions about the role of waste-toenergy in Australia’s future waste management system. Continued collaboration between industry, regulators and researchers will be essential to ensure waste-to-energy technologies continue to evolve alongside scientific understanding and community expectations. Dr Nathan Weber is a Chancellor’s Research Fellow in the School of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Technology Sydney. His research focuses on thermal treatment technologies, emissions characterisation and emerging contaminants, including PFAS.

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

Unlike pollutants such as NOx, acid gases or dioxins, CO2 is not removed by conventional air pollution control systems. Image: 3rdtimeluckystudio/ shutterstock.com

AUG/SEP 2026 INSIDEWASTE 15

news

From the CEO’s desk Putting materials at the heart of climate policy Environment Ministers will meet responsible for the second industry theTake Queensland Government embarked on the development manufacturing, consumption and marketshowever for housing – the Productivityhas Commission reported time this year on 7 December, following a waste management strategy underpinned by a waste disposal recovered materials. This isthe whyfirst WMRR hasofconsistently that housing construction productivity has declined overlevy to increase advocated for sustainable(MEM) productindesign and policies that recent decades. Whilenew Europe andThe Asia State embrace modular 2018 Meeting of Environment Ministers recycling and recovery and create jobs. will re-introduce a $70/ prevent waste before is created. digital There design, are industrialised manufacturing April, which was in part a response to itthe import tonne landfill levyconstruction, in March 2019. also strong attempts to use policy prevention is only partSword of the story. No matter howdiscounts and greater material efficiency – includingthe recycled restrictions driven by But China’s National levers (levy and exemptions) to incentivise use of recycled material products arehas designed, product will materials – Australia continues to build homes largely Policy and the effectswell this policy had every across andeventually make it cost competitive with virgin material. However, little has been done to reach the end of its useful life. That is why Australia’s the same way it did thirty years ago. We shouldn’t be the Australian waste and resource recovery (WARR) establish new markets and Government has not taken the lead in the procurement WARR sector is critical. We provide the infrastructure that surprised that productivity has stalled if our approach to industry. Key decisions derived from the April MEM of recycled material. There are grants available for resource recovery operations allows circularity to happen in practice. We collect, sort innovation has too. Housing is just one example. include: in Queensland although no has monies to assist and recover materials. We produce high-quality recycled Australia never have lackedbeen ideas.allocated What we have often in 2018. This is troubling as Queensland rolled out its Container Refund Scheme feedstocks for Australian manufacturers. We divert lacked is the confidence to integrate them. We continueon 1 November, • Reducing waste generation, endorsing a target which will likely impact theclimate cost and revenue modelspolicy, of the State’s MRFs – as we organics from landfill, recover nutrients and renewable to develop policy, manufacturing housing of 100% of Australianenergy, packaging being recyclable, have seen that most recently in NSW. policy and waste policy in separate manage the residual materials policy, productivity and responsibly compostable or reusable byyet 2025, and developing cannot be recycled. portfolios, even though the challenges they seek to solve In other words, the circular economy is the strategy. AUSTRALIA are fundamentally connected. targets for recycled content in packaging. WESTERN Resource recovery is the enabling infrastructure that The Government circular economy an economic frameworkin that • Increasing Australia’s domestic recycling capacity. The Western Australian setisup a Waste Taskforce direct response to greater value resources. WARR makes it work. By• Increasing Gayle Sloan, CEO WMRR the demand for recycled products. the China Nationaldelivers Sword. As part offrom thisfewer announcement, the isState Government why WMRR deliberately incorporated “Resource fundamental to this, we ensure continuesystem - red for • Exploring opportunities to advance waste-to-energyThat andiswaste-to-biofuels. urged all local councils to begin thegiven utilisation of materials a three (3)-bin Recovery” into our name in 2019. It reflects the breadth circulating instead of being lost. Around the world, AT WMRR’S CIRCULAR ECONOMY CONFERENCE (ENVIRO • Updating the 2009 Waste Strategy by year end, which will include circular general waste, yellow for recyclables and green for organic waste - over the coming of our sector – not just managing waste, but recovering governments are increasingly recognising that resource 2026), we were privileged to host Iain Gulland and Andrew economy principles. years to reduce contamination. While this taskforce is a step in the right direction, valuable resources, supporting local manufacturing, efficiency is not simply an environmental objective. Morlet – between them, they have helped shape global we are yet to see any tangible results from it or any funding and for industry. In October, reducing emissions and building a more circular economy. It is an economic, manufacturing, productivity thinking on the circular economy, influencing governments, It is time take stockclimate and examine what been achieved since these decisions WA Waste Authority It also highlights why climate policy, andthe circular climatereleased strategy! its draft Waste Strategy to 2030, which comprises business and to international policy. Among thehas many were they announced. seven (7) months may not seem likepolicy a long however a comprehensive and detailed roadmap the State’s shared vision of economy aretime, not separate silos. Australia now must build ontowards that momentum – insights shared, oneNow, message resonated strongly with time we have seen further markets close (Malaysia, Vietnam) andfrom mybecoming a sustainable, circularemissions economy. One Indonesia, of the strongest reflections conversations everydaylow-waste, our sector reduces by recovering mein–that Australia’s climate conversation is incomplete. with both Iain and was that we cannot recycle our valuable materials, producing quality recycled wrong. The transition to renewablefinancial energy stress, ifDon’t youget aremean operator under continued seven (7) Andrew months could way to a circular economy. is essential. make orDecarbonising break you. our electricity, transport and COMMONWEALTHfeedstocks, generating renewable energy from genuine Recycling remains essential and often does the heavythe MEM residual waste and supplying Australian manufacturers industrial sectors must remain at the centre of Australia’s Following in April, Australia now has a new Federal Environment Minister, in keeping materials circulating. But Melissa the greatest secondaryreiterated resources. to Wemedia are climate infrastructure. pathway to net the zero. April But climate justhad aboutthree (3)lifting Following MEM,policy we isn’t have states step in with varying Price, whowith in October MEM’s commitment to explore environmental and climate benefits come much earlier Yet our contribution is still too often measured energy. It’s also about materials. degrees of financial assistance for industry (councils and operators). This should waste to energy as part of the solution to the impacts of China’s National Sword, – through designing products that last longer, can be through the lens of landfill emissions, rather than the Globally, around 70 per cent of greenhouse gas be expected considering almost all states (except Queensland and Tasmania) have which is troubling (EfW is not a solution to recycling). The Commonwealth has repaired, reused and remanufactured before recycling is broader role we play in decarbonising manufacturing, emissions are associated with the extraction, processing, access to significant waste levy income each year. On the eastern seaboard, Victoria Recycling Label and andsupporting endorsedAustralia’s the National Packaging ever required. That is systems thinking. It isalso alsobacked industrialthe Australian reducing resource extraction manufacture, transport, use and disposal of materials. has approximately $600 million in waste theclimate Sustainability Fund Targets developedtransition by the towards Australian Packaging Covenant policyinand policy. a circular economy, which will Organisation (APCO), To seriously tackle climate change, we must think levy reserves and NSW raises moreenergy than to $700 per annum from There is aboutwhich has to date, failed tobuild incorporate industry feedback in the development In mythe view,waste we do levy. not talk enough the ultimately a stronger, smarter and more resilient beyond generating cleaner how million we design, make, certainly no lack of funds that can be reinvested into our essential industry. of these To the One Commonwealth’s there been significant relationship between Sustainable Development Goal 12targets. Australia. that creates morecredit, value from everyhas tonne use and recover the products and materials that underpin – Responsible Consumption and Productioncoordination – and SDG 13 – in reviewing of material, the strengthens domestic our economy. National Wastemanufacturing, Policy, with the Department of Climate Action.longer way with createstogether skilled jobs,industry reduces reliance imported virgin As we prepare to co-host COP31 where halving waste goes Funding helps but as we– know, the money a much Environment bringing playersonand States during the review The twopolicy are inseparable. determines resources and drives innovation across the economy. features on the agenda – Australia has a once-in-aGovernment support and leadership, as well as appropriate levers. How we consume process. what we produce, how much energy we use, whether Environmental responsibility and economic prosperity generation opportunity to help shape the next chapter of valuable materials are recovered or lost. Every product are notnow competing objectives. They are Ministers the same. on 7 December. The climate action. VICTORIA The updated Policy will go before Environment carries an embedded carbon footprint long before As we prepare for COP31, Australia can redefine Leadership on the international stage, however, Victoria has arguably been the most active and earnest in supporting the industry Commonwealth can play a key role – one that goes beyond the development of the it reaches our homes, and every product discarded what climate leadership looks like. Not simply cleaner starts with leadership at home, which means recognising post-China, with two (2) relief packages announced to support the recycling National Waste Policy. WMAA is supportive of the Federal Government maximising prematurely represents wasted materials, wasted energy, energy. But smarter design. Better production. that climate policy, industrial policy, productivity, industry, valued a total of $37are million. The Victorian Government also gone emissions. the levers it has, including taxation and importation to maintain a strong, wasted investment has and unnecessary Responsible consumption, and a genuinepowers, commitment to manufacturing and theatcircular economy not separate above and beyond all others states by announcing it would take a leadership role sustainable waste and resource recovery industry. This isn’t about asking Australians to stop buying things. keeping valuable materials in productive use for as long conversations. in creating market demand for recycled products. It is about buying, and valuing, products differently. as possible. They are all connected by one simple question: how do AHEAD Choosing products designed to last, which can be OF MEM 2 Climate policy doesn’t begin at the power station, it we create more value while using fewer virgin resources? repaired instead of replaced, and made withThere recycled begins withacross every product we design, every material we For too long Australia has viewed waste as an SOUTH AUSTRALIA may be movement Australia, with some states doing better than materials. Supporting$2 businesses that design for durability choose, every purchasing we make, and every environmental issue that begins awhen a product Government announced $12.4 millionissupport package comprising million of others, but the consensus is, progress is decision still taking way too long. It is evident that rather disposability. opportunity we create recover for thrown away. expenditure, $5 million additional funding additional for than a loan scheme, together there are funds available in almost alltoStates tothose assistmaterials with developing secondary It’s also about creating policy has settings that reward another life. It doesn’t. It begins much earlier at the drawing board, SA budget. with targeted funding from–the Green Industries The Government manufacturing infrastructure, however the only way that this will really happen is responsible production instead of encouraging a If Australia is to leave a legacy from COP31, this is on the factory floor and in the decisions made about what also offered grants for recycling infrastructure. if there is government leadership around mandating recycled content in Australia throwaway economy. These are not simply consumer the conversation we must lead. Not simply how we products are made from, how long they last, whether they now, not later. choices. They are climate choices. They are also decarbonise our energy systems, but how we build a can be repaired or reused, and what happens to them when NEW SOUTH WALES productivity choices. truly circular economy that reduces emissions across the they eventually reach the end of their useful life. That is the At first New South Wales’ eye-watering $47Australia millionspends recycling Voluntary schemes like the Used a greatsupport deal of time discussing entire life of everyPackaging product. NEPM, under which APCO is auspiced, essence of aglance, circular economy. package was heralded as thestrategy. spark of needed. However, onconsider closerthe roleare not working. We That haveis1.6million tonnes ofconversation packaging we waste in Australia, which productivity, yet we rarely that resource the complete climate A circular economy is not a waste It ishope an industry inspection, ofwaste this package that was funded via theinnovation Waste Less, Recycle needsplay to be an input back into packaging. Barriers to using efficiency, and better product design in used as should be having– there has never been a better time recycled content economic model the that bulk designs out resources. improving it. to start. It creates value through design,the smarter More initiative andbetter therefore waste levy, was not new, making it very difficult in civil infrastructure must be identified and removed, and Government must lead

for stakeholders, including local government, to utilise the funds as they were already committed other activities. Some of the criteria proposed by the NSW 16 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEPto 2026 EPA also made it challenging for industry to apply to these grants. On the plus side, efforts are being made by the NSW Government to stimulate demand for recycled content through the intergovernmental agency working groups that have been established, though no tangible increase in demand or facilities have

in this field and prefer and purchase recycled material. A tax on virgin material should also be imposed as it isnews overseas. MEM must show strong leadership on this Daily updates at www.insidewaste.com.au issue. Ministers have, since April, dealt directly with operators and councils that are under stress and we have a chance to create jobs and investment in Australia at a time when manufacturing is declining. Ministers have the opportunity to be leaders of today, not procrastinators – leaders of tomorrow and we are urging

evelopment y to increase duce a $70/ o use policy cled material been done to procurement y operations 2018. This is 1 November, MRFs – as we

response to Government tem - red for r the coming ht direction, y. In October, ch comprises ed vision of

QUALITY IN. QUALITY OUT. That’s what FOGO is all about. FOGO is the right thing to do and hard to get right. There’s much to consider, plenty of challenges to overcome. Launching and maintaining a successful FOGO service requires solid preparation, a range of skills, accurate data and learning along the way. You might be needing help to lighten the load or boost confidence in strategic choices.

ent Minister, nt to explore ional Sword, nwealth has al Packaging tion (APCO), evelopment n significant partment of g the review

cember. The pment of the t maximising ain a strong,

better than evident that g secondary lly happen is t in Australia

is auspiced, tralia, which cled content nt must lead gin material rship on this councils that t in Australia rtunity to be e are urging

Our quality team is ready to support your FOGO and GO needs. Developing and reviewing strategy Designing trials Educating and engaging communities Auditing new and existing programs Conducting cost benefit analysis Benchmarking service models

It’s never too early or late to make FOGO great. Give us a shout. (02) 9907 0994 admin@aprince.com.au www.aprince.com.au

Thought Leadership //

The value of deepening stakeholder engagement By Bronwyn Elliott THERE IS INCREDIBLE BENEFIT IN THE PRACTICE of deep and respectful listening. Practiced as a natural way within First Nation culture, each Nation has a word that describes it. In Ngan’gikurunggurr, a Northern Territory language, that word is ‘dadirri’. For First Nations’ people, deep listening is about connecting to people but also connecting to country and how you learn about the way a landscape functions, where water flows, winds blow, where it’s hot, cold, who visits, what grows and so much more. The term ‘Stakeholder Engagement’ is a nondescript way to define what this process really needs to be. Engaging with stakeholders is like the indigenous practices. It’s about understanding the players – be they residents, consumers, businesses, educators, contractors, healthcare workers, employers, employees, tourists or others. Many wear multiple hats. It’s also about learning and placing value on their knowledge and experiences. Engagement is an important ingredient in the design mix of elements

that form the structure of a strategy or project. Getting this engagement right can make a big difference to the quality, acceptance and success of the project. Coming from a place of curiosity to consider another perspective keeps the door open to receiving information flows with a light footprint. Finding this out can be both complex and rewarding. Meeting people on their turf can often be a safe place to begin. As residents, consumers, voters, employees, business owners and members of communities, we have likely experienced the frustration of not being heard. But, knowing you have been heard builds trust, connection and community, which can be powerful for local governments as their communities will see and feel if they’ve been properly heard by the resultant services, strategies and projects. Stakeholder engagement therefore is and should be more robust than just a community check-in process. As consultants, we are often visitors into a community, town, council, government or business. We come with a job to undertake, with a budget, a timeline and some goals.

The early part of the project is the most exciting, if we allow it. We come to listen to our clients. We find in listening that behind the client and the project there is another audience, commonly diverse. Who are they? What do they know? What do they think? What do they want or not want? How do they feel? It’s helpful to observe before interacting. Visiting a place and quietly connecting to it brings awareness. It’s very much an acknowledgement of country. Walking around a factory, a landfill or a town. Sitting in a café listening. Going to places where community is at its best – community gardens, repair cafes, markets, sporting events, art galleries, feeling the landscape and watching how people interact and systems function. It’s powerful and it’s important. Wagga Wagga City Council recently contracted APC Waste Consultants to develop its resource recovery and waste strategy, supporting its transition to a more circular economy. Our brief included stakeholder engagement. Located on Wiradjuri Country, the word here for deep listening and reflection is winhangadurinya. We came to Wagga Wagga to listen, to feel, to understand and to then try to build the strategy that reflected the community, its needs, practices and culture. We did a lot of initial groundwork, remotely unpacking the diversity of Wagga’s community, finding who had interest in the project and how they might connect to a more circular Wagga. We wanted to know how the community felt about becoming more circular and what circular activities were already in place.

Strong engagement with various aspects of a community is key to getting desired outcomes. Image: PeopleImages /stock.adobe.com

18 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEP 2026

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

// Thought Leadership

Bringing people along on a circular journey requires trust building – with Council, with community, with recovery systems and with the value of recovering resources. Before we arrived, we rang many organisations and people and introduced ourselves. We talked about Council’s plan to develop a strategy, to engage more deeply and we listened to what they said. We visited the region observing, exploring, sitting and some more listening. We went earlier than our planned meetings, so we could observe and build connections and understanding. We were received like family when we arrived, because we had taken the time to slowly connect, because we came with respect, and because the community felt heard. We met many people in their safe places. We went to the community garden, to local sporting events, to the Men’s Shed, to the small local bulk food shop hiding up an alleyway, and to the farmers’ markets. We also visited contractors and we met with creatives at the local art society. We bought supplies for our stay from local small businesses. We came to understand the community and left with a lot more knowledge and insight. We ran focus groups and workshops with residents, businesses, farmers, community groups, contractors and Council. We brought some structure into these sessions, but we also allowed time to let conversations flow where it was apparent they would ensure good information sharing. We heard in one of our meetings with Council

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

that we had unearthed many amazing enterprises that long-term locals weren’t even aware of. We felt a strong desire from nearly everyone we spoke with that they wanted to be part of something more aspirational and more circular. This feedback supported Council in their decision making and was an important underpinning for the strategy. We then developed a draft for the strategy and along the way still had some questions. The relationships we built made it simple to reach back

out and seek more feedback, that smoothed the path towards a Strategy that most people felt happy with. The strategy was then adopted with very minimal adjustments. This we believe is largely due to the valuing of good engagement and taking time to deeply listen. Bronwyn Elliott is a snr consultant with APC Waste Consultants

Bringing people along on a circular journey requires trust building. Image: PeopleImages /stock.adobe.com

AUG/SEP 2026 INSIDEWASTE 19

Product Stewardship //

Packaging remains one of the prominent product stewardship challenges in Australia. Image: Krakenimages.com/ shutterstock.com

Product stewardship needs stronger national action AUSTRALIA HAS EMBRACED PRODUCT STEWARDSHIP as a key tool in the push towards a circular economy, but the current system is falling short of its potential, according to Mike Ritchie, managing director of MRA Consulting Group. Speaking at Waste 2026 in Coffs Harbour, Ritchie argued that while Australia has made progress in resource recovery, the next phase of improvement will require governments to embrace mandatory product

stewardship models, something that few of those managing such schemes have in place. He said most are voluntary, which needs to change. The challenge is becoming increasingly urgent. Governments have set ambitious waste diversion targets, including a goal of achieving 80 per cent resource recovery by 2030. Ritchie said Australia has performed strongly to date, but reaching future targets will need faster action and better policy settings.

While voluntary schemes divert hundreds of thousands of tonnes of material, it is not enough. Image: Parilov/shutterstock.com

20 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEP 2026

In his view, governments have only a limited number of tools available to divert material from landfill. Landfill levies play an important role by improving the economics of recycling, while mandates can help create markets and drive behaviour change. However, he believes extended producer responsibility remains one of the most underutilised mechanisms available. “Under such schemes, manufacturers and importers contribute funds into a stewardship arrangement,” he said. “A product-responsible organisation then uses those funds to recover materials from the economy and return them to recycling systems. The government’s role should largely be to establish the framework, enforce compliance and set recovery targets, allowing industry to manage operations.”

Mandatory schemes delivering stronger outcomes Australia currently has more than 100 product stewardship schemes operating across various sectors. However, Ritchie contends that only a small fraction of them are delivering meaningful outcomes. “There are 106 of these schemes in the country, and 97 of them don’t work very well, and nine do, and the nine that do are all mandatory,” he said. The nine mandatory schemes consist of the eight state-based container deposit schemes and the oil stewardship scheme. These programs are achieving diversion rates of between 60 and 80 per cent. By contrast, voluntary schemes consistently struggle to deliver substantial recovery outcomes. “The conclusion of my talk is the ones that work are mandatory, the ones that seem to work but don’t Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

// Product Stewardship

actually deliver very much reform are voluntary schemes,” he said. “I applaud the efforts of people working in voluntary stewardship arrangements but, they are battling economic forces that they cannot overcome. “ Drawing on analysis undertaken through a federal government review process, Ritchie noted that voluntary schemes collectively divert hundreds of thousands of tonnes of material. While he said this appears impressive, much of the recovery is associated with existing recycling systems rather than new stewardship initiatives. “The more important measure is the percentage of material recovered compared with the total amount placed on the market,” he said. “Using this metric, most voluntary schemes achieve recovery rates of only one to 16 per cent. “Your best effort is recovering 16 per cent and letting 84 per cent of these materials go to landfill.” This raises questions about whether governments should continue relying on voluntary approaches or instead establish mandatory frameworks that allow stewardship organisations to recover materials at scale. One of the keys to mandatory schemes is the ability to set meaningful levies that can fund collection, recovery and recycling activities. Container deposit schemes provide an example of how this works. According to Ritchie, mandatory arrangements provide the financial certainty needed to fund both collection systems and consumer incentives. Without those mechanisms, recovery rates remain constrained.

Packaging and emerging stewardship priorities Packaging remains one of the prominent product stewardship challenges in Australia. During his talk, Ritchie described the existing co-regulatory packaging scheme as a disappointment, noting that governments have repeatedly discussed making the system mandatory without taking decisive action. “It’s been announced six times that we’re going to mandate it,” he said. While he acknowledged recent efforts by government, he argued that progress has been slow and that the packaging sector increasingly recognises the need for stronger regulation. A coalition involving the packaging industry, recycling sector and environmental groups has emerged in support of reform. “Many businesses are frustrated by free riders who avoid stewardship obligations while competing against companies attempting to do the right thing,” said Ritchie. “The objective should be to create a system in which all participants contribute and are held to the same standards. Such an approach would allow higher recovery targets to be established and properly funded.” Plastic packaging remains the biggest challenge within the broader packaging stream. Ritchie said improving plastic recovery rates will require substantial investment and a strong regulatory framework. Battery stewardship represents another area where governments are moving towards a mandatory approach. While the details are still being developed, Ritchie believes the future success of battery recycling Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

Oil is one of only nine product stewardship schemes out of 100-plus schemes that is mandatory. Image: Wongsakorn 2468/shutterstock.com

will depend on establishing a clear and unified governance structure. “I am very much in the camp of one operator, one product responsibility organisation,” he said. He pointed to previous experiences with television and computer recycling schemes, where multiple stewardship organisations operated simultaneously. In his view, a single national organisation would deliver greater consistency and efficiency. Ritchie also highlighted legislation developed in New South Wales that could be adopted by other jurisdictions to accelerate product stewardship reform. However, he questioned why a country with a relatively small population continues to rely on fragmented state-by-state arrangements. Then there are solar panels, which present another emerging challenge. While governments have provided funding to establish collection networks and pilot programs, Ritchie argued that taxpayer-funded initiatives should not replace producer responsibility. “We need to make industry designers, the people manufacturing this stuff, think about recycling at the end of life and take responsibility for it,” he said. “Product stewardship should encourage manufacturers to consider recyclability from the design stage through to end-of-life management.” Soft plastics remain another area of concern following the collapse of previous collection arrangements. While there have been efforts by retailers to rebuild collection networks, the absence of a mandatory framework continues to limit progress. “It’s always going to be marginal,” said Ritchie. “Without the ability to raise levies across the entire market, soft plastic recovery systems will struggle to provide the support needed by recyclers and reprocessors.”

The container deposit success story While Ritchie was critical of many stewardship arrangements, he identified container deposit schemes as a clear success. These state-based systems are achieving recovery rates of between 60 and 80 per cent, with South Australia continuing to lead performance due to its long-established program. “These are all mandatory and we know their metrics,” said Ritchie. “These schemes provide

transparency, accountability and measurable outcomes. Governments know how much material enters the market, how much is recovered, and how recovery rates are changing over time.” Despite their success, he believes there is considerable room for improvement. One issue is the lack of national consistency. Different jurisdictions operate separate schemes with different administrators and network operators. While all are broadly successful, Ritchie argued that a national approach would generate efficiencies and reduce duplication. He also highlighted growing discussion around expanding eligible containers and increasing refund values. Queensland and the Northern Territory have already added wine and spirits containers to their schemes, while New South Wales has committed to introducing similar changes in coming years. More importantly, Ritchie believes the long-standing 10 cent refund should be increased. “The value of the rebate, if it’s not escalated with inflation, decreases in its pulling power over time,” he said. “South Australia’s original five-cent refund introduced in 1977 would be worth substantially more in today’s dollars. As the real value of the refund declines, so too does its ability to motivate participation. If we have a weak rebate value, we’ll have weak recovery rates.” He believes increasing refunds is one of the most straightforward ways to boost collection rates and further improve performance. As Australia seeks to accelerate progress towards higher resource recovery targets, Ritchie believes the evidence is clear. Product stewardship remains a powerful policy tool, but only when backed by mandatory participation, effective regulation and adequate funding. “EPR only, it’s a great mechanism. We need to make it work, but it has to be mandatory,” he said. His conclusion was equally direct. Container deposit schemes and oil stewardship programs are delivering strong outcomes, while many voluntary arrangements continue to operate at the margins. Without stronger national leadership and a willingness to mandate stewardship obligations, Australia will struggle to achieve the recovery rates needed to meet future waste and recycling goals. AUG/SEP 2026 INSIDEWASTE 21

Landfill Gas Management //

Turning landfill gas into long-term value AS AUSTRALIA’S WASTE SECTOR CONTINUES to evolve, landfill gas management is becoming complex, requiring councils to balance environmental obligations, energy opportunities and long-term financial outcomes. For Logan City Council in Queensland, the impending expiry of its long-running landfill gas agreement at the Browns Plains Landfill presented an opportunity to rethink how the resource could be managed into the future. The council engaged Ethos Resources to facilitate the procurement process for a new landfill gas management contract at the site, ensuring the facility could continue to capture methane, generate value and maintain effective management as the landfill approaches the later stages of its operational life. For two decades, landfill gas at Browns Plains has been managed by EDL, which pioneered the capture of landfill gas and its use as a renewable energy source through gas

22 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEP 2026

engines. The project resulted in a 2MW landfill gas power station, exporting electricity to the grid and creating a revenue stream through both electricity generation and carbon credit sales. However, with the existing contract due to end in March 2027, Logan City Council needed to ensure the next phase of landfill gas management delivered strong environmental outcomes while maximising value for the community. Ethos Resources director Joel Harris said the procurement process involved navigating a range of technical, commercial and regulatory challenges. “Landfill gas projects have become increasingly complex,” Harris said. “Councils need to consider not only the operational requirements of extracting and managing gas, but also the changing carbon credit landscape, future landfill closure requirements and how they can maximise the value generated from these assets.”

One of the key challenges at Browns Plains was ensuring the future landfill gas system remained fit for purpose as the site moves towards closure, which is expected around 2032-34. While landfill operations eventually cease, landfill gas generation continues for many years after closure. Ongoing extraction and management infrastructure remains critical. Ethos Resources developed a procurement package designed to address the long-term needs of the site. The process required detailed financial analysis and comparison of highly technical submissions, translating complex engineering, energy and carbon market information into a format that supported clear decision-making. Ethos Resources’ broader work includes supporting councils and organisations with procurement, feasibility assessments, financial analysis, risk management and project delivery across resource

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

// Landfill Gas Management

recovery and renewable energy projects. A major opportunity identified through the Browns Plains process was the potential to increase electricity generation capacity. The existing system operated with approximately 2MW of generation capacity, but Ethos assessed opportunities associated with network constraints and upgrades that could allow expansion towards 3MW, along with consideration of emerging technologies such as battery energy storage systems. “The objective was not simply to replace an existing contract,” Harris said. “It was about creating a structure that allowed Council to capture more value from the landfill gas resource while ensuring the system could adapt as the landfill changes over time.” The successful procurement outcome delivered many benefits for the council, including an improved revenue-sharing arrangement and a contract structure that reduces financial exposure for the council while ensuring the landfill gas system continues to be operated, maintained and expanded. A 15-year agreement was secured to align with the 12-year crediting period under the new landfill gas Australian Carbon Credit Unit (ACCU) methodology. This Rather than managing landfill gas as an operational requirement, councils are recognising the opportunity to use these resources to reduce emissions. Image: Robert V Schwemmer/shutterstock.com

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

provides greater certainty for both Logan City Council and the contractor, allowing investment decisions to be made with a longer-term view. The Browns Plains project was built on Ethos Resources’ experience supporting landfill gas projects across Australia, including work with Clarence Valley Council in New South Wales. Through that project, Ethos supported Council in achieving a new approach to landfill gas management at the Grafton Regional Landfill, resulting in upgrades to methane capture infrastructure and improved environmental outcomes. The Grafton project involved the installation of 12 vertical gas extraction wells, five gas collection lines and more than 800 metres of underground pipework connected to an enclosed flaring unit. The upgraded system has improved methane capture while allowing the council and the community to benefit from the generation of ACCUs. The project demonstrated how landfill gas management can provide both environmental and financial benefits, with captured methane converted from a liability into a measurable emissions reduction opportunity.

For councils, these projects highlight the increasing importance of taking a strategic approach to landfill gas assets. Rather than managing landfill gas as an operational requirement, councils are recognising the opportunity to use these resources to reduce emissions, generate renewable energy and create long-term community value. Ethos Resources said the Browns Plains project demonstrates the importance of combining technical understanding with commercial expertise when managing complex waste infrastructure. “Landfill gas projects sit at the intersection of waste management, renewable energy, carbon markets and long-term asset planning,” Harris said. “Successful outcomes require an understanding of all those areas and the ability to bring them together in a practical solution for councils.” As landfill sites across Australia mature, the need for effective gas management will only increase. Projects such as Browns Plains and Grafton show how councils can use specialist advice and innovative procurement models to turn landfill gas from an environmental challenge into a long-term opportunity. Gas generation continues for many years after a landfill has closed. Image: newphotoservice/shutterstock.com

AUG/SEP 2026 INSIDEWASTE 23

Thought Leadership //

Collecting food and plastics in urban environments The challenge, she noted, is finding the resources to continually engage residents and maintain participation over time.

WHEN ENGLAND INTRODUCED REFORMS TO standardise recycling collections, local authorities were faced with a challenge that went beyond adding another bin. For dense urban environments, especially flats, high-rise developments and mixed-use buildings, the question was how to make mandated food waste and future soft plastics collections work in locations where space is limited, residents are transient and recycling behaviours can be difficult to influence. Cathy Cook, senior advisor at ReLondon, has been involved in helping local authorities navigate these challenges. Speaking about England’s simpler recycling reforms at the recent Coffs Harbour Waste 2026 conference, Cook outlined both the opportunities and obstacles that have emerged as councils work towards consistent collections across households, businesses and workplaces.

A shift in recycling policy According to Cook, England’s simpler recycling reforms stem from the Resources and Waste Strategy published in 2018 by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), representing one of the biggest shake-ups of waste legislation in decades. “There were three areas of reform underneath this strategy: simple recycling, which applies to England only; extended producer responsibility, which you’ve got a form of here that applies to all four nations; and the Deposit Return Scheme, which is the return and earn scheme that you have here, that also applies to all four UK nations,” she said. The reforms were designed to bring greater consistency to recycling services after years of variation between local authorities. “A few years ago, one of the ministers looked at collection of recycling across the UK and said, ‘you’ve got different materials, you’ve got different frequencies, you’ve got different bin colours… we need some sort of consistency’,” said Cook. Under the reforms, local authorities are required to provide collections for a standard set of dry recyclables and food waste. While councils have flexibility regarding collection systems and frequencies for most materials, food waste collections are mandatory on a weekly basis for households. To support implementation, the UK Government provided £295 million in funding for local authorities. “If a government is telling you that you have to do something under legislation, they will provide funding for you to do that,” Cook said. However, despite the funding, implementation has not been straightforward. Many councils faced procurement bottlenecks as they simultaneously attempted to acquire food waste caddies, collection vehicles and other equipment.

Why participation depends on convenience While infrastructure is important, Cook said successful food waste collections depend on making participation 24 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEP 2026

Making recycling work in flats

Senior advisor at ReLondon Cathy Cook. Images: Cathy Cook

as easy as possible for residents. One issue that emerged early was the provision of food waste liners. Funding provided through the reforms did not cover liners, despite evidence suggesting they are critical to maintaining participation rates. “We spoke to DEFRA about this, and we said, ‘Look, we’ve done a lot of studies to show if you don’t provide liners, then participation will drop off’, but they said that they weren’t going to fund that,” said Cook. Cook said experience from multiple projects has consistently demonstrated the importance of convenience. She said if you provide necessities that aid in carrying out the collections, then participation remains high, but if bin liners or other necessary products are no longer available, then participation drops off. People are reluctant to spend money on such items, so councils and other local bodies have to make it as easy as possible for people to participate. Research has also highlighted several factors that influence food waste capture rates. Collection frequency for residual waste plays a major role, with less frequent residual collections driving higher food waste participation. “If you are collecting your residual waste weekly, it’s a lot lower yield, because obviously people will just put it in the residual,” said Cook. “If it goes to fortnightly, or even three weekly, or four weekly, you will find you’ll get a lot more food waste, because obviously people don’t want to wait three or four weeks to get rid of their food waste.” Cook also pointed to deprivation levels and resident engagement as influences on recycling performance. “We’ve found that these three things together – liners, leaflets, stickers – work a real treat,” she said. “If you miss one out, then it’s not so great.”

For ReLondon, one of the areas of focus has been improving recycling performance in flats and high-density housing. London presents a difficult environment. The city contains large numbers of flats, high levels of deprivation in some areas and high population turnover. Recycling rates vary between inner and outer boroughs, reflecting the challenges associated with dense urban living. Cook said research undertaken by ReLondon identified a series of recurring barriers. Such as? “Lack of space, levels of deprivation,” she said. “Language is quite an interesting one in London. In some boroughs we’ve got over 200 different languages. It’s a very multicultural space, so communication is a struggle. A lot of the time, people only spend maybe six months in their flat, maybe up to a year, and then they’ve gone.” She also highlighted the issue of anonymity, which does not encourage people to do the right thing. “If you go down to the bin and you just want to put whatever you want to put in there, if you’re in a flat, who’s going to know?” she said. To better understand how residents interact with recycling infrastructure, ReLondon undertook a research project focused on flats. Rather than designing systems solely from a waste management perspective, the organisation examined how residents moved through and used their buildings. “We did a lot of ethnographic research,” said Cook. “Rather than having our waste management hat on and saying, ‘well, we’re going to go to this block of flats and we think this bin should go here’, we put our head into the minds of the residents that live there.” The research considered practical factors often overlooked in traditional service design. “If I’m coming out of my door and I’m going to work, where’s the best place for my bin?” said Cook. “If I’m a single woman, do I really want to go to a dark corner of the flats with no lighting and go and take my waste there?” Working directly with residents helped identify suitable locations for recycling infrastructure and generated good results, although Cook noted that maintaining those gains requires ongoing effort and resources.

The importance of maintenance and future challenges One of the key findings from ReLondon’s work was that successful recycling systems in flats are often built around relatively simple principles rather than complex technological solutions. Cook stressed there was no secret formula. “It’s not rocket science,” she said. “What we basically found is: clean your bins, have really good Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

// Thought Leadership

signage, and put your bins where people think they want to go.” However, maintaining those conditions requires constant attention. Cook said that once a bin gets dirty, or a light goes out in a bin store, then people don’t want to use it. She said it’s about keeping on top of these issues the whole time. The challenge becomes even greater in flats above shops, which ReLondon studied through a dedicated project known as FLASH. These properties present unique difficulties due to limited space, multiple stakeholders, planning constraints and heavy street activity. “You have so many users of the street,” she said. “Then you have so many stakeholders involved, and you’ve got planning permission that you need to think about, and you’ve got heritage areas you need to think about.” Cook said providing services to every household, as required under the reforms, remains difficult in these environments. “We’ve said to DEFRA, ‘you want us to put in these services to all households?’ They have said all households, no restraint, absolutely every single household,” she said. Looking ahead, the next challenge will be the introduction of flexible plastics collections. Trials involving 10 councils found many residents preferred using dedicated collection bags, although maintaining bag supplies remains an ongoing issue. At the same time, questions remain about processing capacity, which Cook acknowledges is limited.

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

While England has now mandated collection of flexible plastics, she said developing the infrastructure needed to process the material remains an issue. As local authorities continue implementing food waste services and prepare for flexible plastics

collections, Cook’s experience suggests that success depends not only on legislation and infrastructure, but also on understanding how people live, designing services around their daily routines and maintaining systems that residents find easy and convenient to use. Local authorities are required to provide collections for a standard set of dry recyclables and food waste.

AUG/SEP 2026 INSIDEWASTE 25

Equipment News //

Equalizor simplifies waste processing THE KOMPTECH EQUALIZOR COMBINES HIGH throughput with consistent particle sizing in a single machine. Designed as a medium-speed, single-shaft shredder, it is intended to process commercial, bulky and household waste destined for recycling or thermal recovery while producing a defined output in a single pass. The machine draws on technology developed through Komptech’s Terminator and Crambo shredders, bringing together the strengths of slow-speed, high-torque operation with precise control over particle size. An all-electric direct drive system uses electric motors mounted on both sides of the shredding drum, allowing variable drum speeds, precision adjustment via different basket sizes, overload protection and an automatic reversing function. Together, these features are designed to produce a homogeneous output while maintaining high throughput. According to Alexander Popko, area sales manager for Komptech Austria, the machine was developed in response to changing market expectations and customer demand for more efficient processing. “The Equalizor was developed primarily from the engineering experience gained with the Terminator and Terminator Xtron platforms, combined with growing market demand for a highly efficient one-step shredding solution,” he said. “In recent years, operators have increasingly looked for a machine capable of producing a defined output size in a single pass, particularly for RDF and SRF production, but also for challenging applications such as textiles, tyres and difficult industrial waste streams. That market demand was one of the key drivers behind the development of the Equalizor.” Popko said one of the biggest engineering challenges was combining low-speed, high-torque shredding with precise and consistent particle sizing. The Equalizor addresses this through a single-shaft

design equipped with pointed cutting knives and operating speeds of up to 95 rpm. The Equalizor is available as both a stationary machine and a mobile track version, with future models planned for coarse pre-shredding and precision post-shredding applications. Depending on configuration, the machine is available with either two 132 kW or two 160 kW electric drives and can achieve throughput of up to 50 tonnes an hour under suitable operating conditions.

Features designed for productivity A focus on reducing downtime has influenced many aspects of the Equalizor’s design. Maintenance points are positioned for easy access through large service panels, while maintenance-free electric motors and protected switchgear are intended to simplify servicing. Integrated service platforms also provide operators with improved access during routine maintenance. The machine includes a hydraulically extending screen basket frame that allows tool-free screen basket replacement, helping reduce the time required when changing output sizes. Screen baskets are available for particle sizes ranging from 40 to 200 millimetres, while operators can also adjust drum speed and shredding settings to suit different applications. The shredding drum measures 3,050 millimetres in length and 870 millimetres in diameter, with 42 tooth positions in a mid-cut configuration. Teeth fitted to both the drum and counter-cutter are designed to be reused multiple times. Material is fed through a two by three metre opening, supported by an automatic pre-compressor that promotes a consistent cut. On the mobile model, a hydraulic tilt hopper and stepless discharge conveyor adjustment provide additional flexibility during loading and stockpiling.

Handling challenging waste streams Field testing demonstrated the Equalizor’s ability to process a variety of mixed and difficult materials while maintaining stable operation and consistent output. “One of the most impressive outcomes during field testing was the Equalizor’s ability to handle highly mixed commercial and industrial waste streams with very stable operating behaviour,” said Popko. “Materials with varying densities, moisture levels and contamination are often difficult to process consistently, yet the machine maintained high throughput rates while producing a homogeneous output fraction. “The machine also exceeded expectations in other challenging waste streams like tyres, mattresses and pulper ropes, where irregular and difficult input materials can create feeding challenges for conventional shredders.” He said that the testing phase confirmed the versatility of the machine. Customers were looking for equipment that can quickly adapt to changing waste streams and market requirements. Machine operation is managed through a seven-inch high-resolution colour display with intuitive menu navigation, supported by wireless remote control, onboard diagnostics and integrated troubleshooting functions. These systems are designed to simplify operation while allowing operators to monitor machine performance during processing. Unlike many conventional shredders, the Equalizor uses an all-electric drive system. The mobile Track version incorporates battery-powered travel, enabling the machine to move around site while retaining operational flexibility. “The main concerns customers raise typically relate to infrastructure, mobility, and operational reliability,” said Popko. “With the e-mobile track concept, we offer the same flexibility as a diesel-powered track machine. The machine can

The Equalizor was developed in response to changing market expectations and customer demand. Images: Komptech

26 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEP 2026

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

// Equipment News

travel up to 1.5 km using the battery pack and electric drive, making it easy to move around on site. “The Equalizor was designed from the outset around a highly efficient electric drive concept capable of delivering strong torque and responsive load management. Intelligent drive control ensures stable machine performance even under difficult operating conditions.” He said that in many cases, once operators experience lower maintenance requirements, reduced noise levels and overall efficiency benefits, confidence in electric drive technology increases very quickly. The battery is recharged during normal shredding operations, and the machine retains all maintenance functions while travelling, with track speeds comparable to diesel-powered models.

process integration will continue to influence the next generation of shredding technology. Finally, he believes AI will play an increasingly important role. In the future, he expects machines to automatically adjust operating parameters based on the incoming feedstock, optimising throughput, energy consumption and output quality without operator intervention. “Another key trend is the integration of

feedstock and process data into overall plant KPIs,” he said. “Operators increasingly want complete transparency across their operations, linking material characteristics with production performance, energy consumption and product quality. We already offer a comprehensive solution for this with our Komptech GO software, enabling operators to monitor and optimise their entire process in real time.”

A hydraulic tilt hopper and stepless discharge conveyor adjustment provide additional flexibility.

Flexibility for changing requirements The Equalizor has been designed to give operators flexibility across a range of waste streams and downstream processes. By adjusting shaft speed, shredding programs and screen basket configurations, the same can be configured for applications including tyres, waste wood, industrial waste and RDF production. “Depending on the material and machine configuration, the Equalizor can consistently achieve output sizes in the 50 to 100 mm range, making it well suited for downstream fuel preparation and recycling processes,” said Popko. Looking ahead, Popko believes automation and

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

AUG/SEP 2026 INSIDEWASTE 27

Artificial Intelligence //

AI gives waste facilities a clearer view of operations THE NAME OSCORP MAY SPARK RECOGNITION among comic book enthusiasts. In the Spider-Man universe, Oscorp is the powerful corporation often portrayed as the antagonist. But for Ani Goswami, founder of Australian start-up Oscorp Energy, the name represents something entirely different. “We are not an evil corporation, we exist in a parallel universe where we do good for the world,” Goswami said. That desire to create positive change is driving the company’s development of Vision OS, an artificial intelligence-powered operating system that gives waste and recycling facilities insight into their operations. The technology forms part of a broader ambition for the business. “Our vision for the company is to enable fully autonomous waste facilities of tomorrow,” Goswami said. “AI makes all the decisions. It just processes waste fully autonomously. That is the vision that we are working towards as a company.” Rather than physically sorting materials, Vision OS functions as the intelligence layer across a facility, continuously monitoring what is happening on the processing line. “This vision product is essentially installed with sensors, lights, and computers with a graphics processing unit (GPU),” Goswami said. “It will track and trace all materials on your conveyor belt.”

The system can be installed as a single unit at a critical processing point or deployed across multiple locations throughout a facility, creating a picture of material movement from arrival through to final output. “You could pretty much track and trace what material is coming in, what material is going out, your recovery rate, your contamination rates and whether there’s any inefficiencies,” Goswami said. “It’s pretty much a digital twin of your facility.” He said the platform goes beyond simply collecting data, allowing operators to identify bottlenecks, understand contamination sources and make operational changes that improve recovery performance before problems escalate. With increasing expectations around reporting and transparency, technologies capable of delivering reliable operational data are becoming increasingly valuable for the waste and recycling sector. “One of the standards says the recycling facility shall

have in place systems and procedures to monitor, record, and report the flow of materials in and out of facilities,” Ani says. “This is a perfect fit for tracking and tracing materials in and out of a facility in a completely autonomous manner.” The information generated by the system also has commercial value. Operators can identify contamination in aluminium streams, detect equipment issues that affect recovery, and use verified data during customer audits or contract negotiations. Because contamination levels fluctuate depending on material streams, collection areas, seasonal influences and consumer behaviour, maintaining consistent quality can be challenging. Vision OS is designed to identify those trends, allowing operators to reduce contamination and recover more valuable resources. The same applies to materials that frequently escape recovery altogether. PET, metals, cardboard and other recyclable commodities can unintentionally end up in

“Vision OS continuously identifies where contamination enters the facility, where valuable material is being lost, and which lines are underperforming or high amounts of contamination - giving operators the insight to improve recovery and reduce contamination.”

Vision OS is the intelligence layer across a facility, continuously monitoring what is happening on the processing line. Images: Oscorp

28 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEP 2026

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

VERTECH SORTING SOLUTIONS MOBILE AND FIXED SYSTEMS DESIGNED FOR AUSTRALIAN CONDITIONS

MOBILE PICKING STATIONS

The Vertech Sorting Range delivers flexible, high-performance recovery across a wide range of waste streams. Available in mobile and fixed configurations, systems are designed for everything from temporary and regional operations to permanent facilities and largescale processing plants. Built for Australian conditions, the range features enclosed cabins, wide picking belts and integrated separation for safe, efficient recovery.

Discover more at wasteinitiatives.com.au

TRACKED TROMMEL SCREENS

Mobile units offer fast setup and easy relocation, while fixed systems provide scalable, longterm processing with customised integration.

Recover valuable commodities, reduce landfill volumes and improve downstream performance across C&D, C&I, FOGO and commingled waste streams. Backed by local engineering, project management and nationwide service support.

STATIC SORTING SYSTEMS

Sorting Components Available • • • • • • • •

Mobile Picking Stations Fixed Picking Stations Trommels & Scalping Screens Overbelt Magnets Eddy Current Separators Air Separation Systems Conveyors & Feed Systems Custom Sorting Solutions

Artificial Intelligence //

“Vision OS tracks material from the moment it enters a facility through to its final output, giving operators a clear view of where value is being recovered, where material is being lost, and where process improvements will have the greatest impact.”

residual waste streams, reducing both recovery rates and profitability. By identifying where those losses occur, facilities can improve performance and strengthen audit outcomes. Alongside operational efficiency, safety remains a key focus for Oscorp Energy. Lithium-ion battery fires continue to pose significant risks across the industry, and the company believes Vision OS can provide another level of protection. The technology combines conventional vision systems with X-ray capability, allowing it to identify hazardous items concealed beneath layers of waste that would otherwise remain invisible. “It will penetrate within 50 to 70 centimetres thickness of waste, and it will keep an eye on all things flammable or hazardous,” he said. “As soon as a hazard is detected, the system can trigger the response best suited to the facility’s risk profile and operating requirements. For facilities with a low risk appetite, this may involve automatically stopping the conveyor to allow safe manual removal. Alternatively, the system can activate a robotic picker, air-jet ejection system or another mechanical separation mechanism to remove the hazardous or

30 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEP 2026

flammable item before it travels further downstream. “A human cannot see what’s underneath the cardboard or plastic on a sorting belt. There might be a very risky battery under that waste that humans can’t see, but X-ray can.” Although the technology appears well suited to waste and recycling, the sector was not where the company began. Goswami’s background is in battery research, and Oscorp Energy initially concentrated on battery recycling applications before recognising a much broader opportunity.

“But then we uncovered this problem that the waste industry was facing, which was a much larger problem to solve,” Goswami said. “There was a logical technology fit.” With commercial deployment approaching, Oscorp Energy is now focused on demonstrating the technology to the market. Potential customers and industry partners are being invited to visit the company’s Queensland robotics facility to see the system operating firsthand. For a company sharing its name with a fictional corporation, Goswami says the objective is firmly rooted in practical outcomes. “We want to show the industry that this technology is not too good to be true,” Goswami said. “It’s reality.”

With commercial deployment approaching, Oscorp Energy is focused on demonstrating the technology to the market.

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

www.insidewaste.com.au/register

www.insidewaste.com.au/register www.insidewaste.com.au/register

Thought Leadership //

The waste sector’s exposure to fuel volatility WITH THE WORLD’S OIL SUPPLY UNDER PRESSURE due to ongoing tensions in the Middle East, Waste Contractors and Recycling Association executive officer, Brett Lemin, put things in perspective during an address at the Coffs Harbour Waste event in March this year. Fuel costs are one of the bigger outlays for contractors who supply the means for waste and recycling streams to be collected. Lemin stated that while Australia may appear distant from Middle Eastern supply risks, the system is intricately interconnected. “Most people in business know that 85 per cent of the refined fuel that we get in Australia comes from Asia,” he said. “However, 75 per cent of Asia’s crude oil come from the Middle East, which impacts heavily on our exposure to issues in that part of the world.” Lemin challenged common assumptions about domestic fuel security, particularly the idea of a 30-day diesel buffer. “It doesn’t necessarily mean that we have 30 days’ worth of diesel onshore. It’s not here in Australia,” he said. “It is a layered system. Between 10 to 15 days of it is stored in tankers, another 10 to 15 days’ worth is in transit on the water, and another five to 10 days is sitting offshore.”

32 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEP 2026

He cautioned that even the offshore portion is not guaranteed, noting it is guaranteed in contracts, but if push came to shove, he didn’t know if the country would have access to the amount claimed to be available.

Demand shocks, panic buying and market instability Lemin said recent conditions have exposed how quickly demand behaviour can destabilise supply chains. He pointed to public uncertainty and inconsistent availability, describing how on any given day he had passed several petrol stations, and nearly all of them were only using one type of fuel. The rest had run out. He said this translated into a national surge in consumption, driven by consumer behaviour rather than underlying need. “What we saw was across the nation recently was about a 25 per cent surge in demand for fuel. That is panic buying,” he said. He highlighted regional impacts. In some regions, especially those areas with a lot of farming and agriculture, the demand for fuel has doubled. Lemin also described a shift in commercial supply

conditions that added to market strain. He said bulk terminals moved from 21-day payment terms to sometimes asking for cash on delivery. This meant some clients had to pay fuel companies up front for that fuel, or they might miss out on deliveries. This change, he said, created serious flow-on effects for smaller operators. “A lot of SMEs really struggled with their supply because they just couldn’t physically get fuel because they couldn’t afford the cash upfront payments,” he said. “It can cause a massive cash flow problem.”

Rising costs and the impact on waste operations Lemin outlined the rapid escalation in fuel pricing and its direct impact on waste services. He said that before the crisis intensified, diesel terminal prices were between $1.60 and $1.70, before rising sharply to $3.08 in March and peaking in April at $3.25 per litre. He connected these increases directly to operational realities in the sector. He said the average rubbish truck can use about 120 litres per day. There are about 2,500 collection trucks in NSW. The result, he said, was a dramatic increase in operating costs.

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

// Thought Leadership

“It’s basically equated to between February and the April peak, an extra $193 per day per truck,” Lemin said. “This amounts to nearly $500,000 additional cost to our sector per day in April.” While government measures have helped reduce prices, Lemin warned that instability remains. There are the structural damage in fuel-producing regions, with around 40 per cent of the infrastructure has been damaged. This will all take to time to repair, he said.

A rapid escalation in fuel pricing can have a huge direct impact on waste services. Image: Hyserb/ shutterstock.com

Policy response, service prioritisation and industry risk There are a range of government interventions aimed at easing pressure on fuel costs. The federal government halved the exercise paid on fuel to the $0.26, while states contributed through GST windfall measures, delivering a $0.30 reduction on the gate price of fuel for businesses. However, benefits were uneven across the sector. “While the fuel tax credit claim didn’t really shift – meaning it was great for the gate price and great for everyday users – it didn’t have that same sort of windfall for the sector as we hoped,” Lemin said. He also discussed the Fair Work Commission’s rapid intervention through “fuel cost recovery measures”, designed to help distribute financial pressure. He said the aim was to try and share the burden, the pain of this fuel cost, and urged industry to ensure contractors were not unfairly impacted. “No one’s trying to get rich off this, they’re just trying to pass on the cost,” he said

On essential services status, Lemin explained that waste is recognised differently across frameworks. Waste services are essential in New South Wales, but under federal legislation the industry is not listed as an essential service. Lemin added that while not formally included, waste services would still be prioritised in practice, noting federal assurances that they understand that waste collection services are absolutely essential and will be highly prioritised. Lemin concluded by outlining the national fuel security planning stages and the potential implications of escalation. He said Stage Two involved “a lot of messaging, a lot of coordination”,

Recent conditions have exposed how quickly demand behaviour can destabilise supply chains. Image: LIGHTITUP/shutterstock.com

while Stage Three could introduce retail limits such as 50 litres a day per vehicle. He warned that tightening restrictions could force service reductions across the sector. “Services will have to drop, and then you have to decide which services drop,” he said. “This includes potential reductions in yellow bin collection and prioritisation of things such as clinical medical waste over residential waste.” Despite these risks, Lemin said the system had so far stabilised, even if uncertainty remains. “It seems to have stabilised a little bit in terms of supply. But who knows what’s going to happen into the future,” he said.

Have you got a waste or recycling business? MRA should be your trusted advisor if you want to sell, find investors, grow or diversify. We have the history and the know-how. • Strategy and Commercial • M&A and Divestments • Investor Relations • Growth Planning • Diversification

Talk to MRA’s experts today Call 02 8541 6169 or email info@mraconsulting.com.au mraconsulting.com.au

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

AUG/SEP 2026 INSIDEWASTE 33

Organics //

Bringing Italian expertise to Australia’s organics sector AS AUSTRALIA EXPANDS ITS FOOD ORGANICS and garden organics (FOGO) recycling infrastructure, Vastum Engineering is working with Italian company Mion Ventoltermica Depurazioni (MVT) to introduce new composting and waste processing technologies to the local market through an agreement signed earlier in 2026. Vastum has established strategic partnerships with a number of specialist mechanical and electrical installation contractors across Australia. It also works alongside a Tier 3 EPC contractor under a joint venture Vastum Engineering has established partnerships with a number of specialist mechanical and electrical installation contractors. Image: Vastum

arrangement, allowing it to provide complete project delivery capability from engineering and technology selection through to construction, commissioning and ongoing support. Vastum Engineering director, Amir Tadros, first encountered MVT at IFAT in 2024 and quickly recognised the potential for the company’s technology. While MVT had focused primarily on the European market, Tadros believed its expertise could help address growing demand as Australia’s organics sector continues to develop.

“I saw they have a great technology,” said Tadros. “I saw the opportunity here in Australia, because the organics market will be expanding vastly in the next few years. We need new entrants; a company to shake and break the market a little bit. MVT was the perfect fit.” Founded in 1968, MVT designs and delivers turnkey waste treatment systems that combine mechanical, biological and air treatment technologies into integrated engineered solutions. Rather than supplying standardised equipment, the company develops each project around a customer’s operational requirements, supporting clients from consulting and engineering through to manufacturing, installation, commissioning and after-sales service. The company has completed more than 5,400 projects across more than 40 countries. “They bring the technologies and know-how, whereas Vastum will bring the local experience, the local knowledge of the market, project delivery and project management,” he said. MVT’s capabilities span several areas of waste management, including organic composting, municipal solid waste processing, air treatment with odour removal using scrubbers, and air purification and dust control. Working together, the companies aim to combine internationally proven technology with local engineering support to deliver efficient and sustainable recycling infrastructure for Australia’s growing organics sector.

Engineered for efficient organics processing According to Paolo Mion, CEO of MVT, Australia’s investment in FOGO presents an opportunity for advanced composting technologies to come to the fore. “Our composting systems have been specifically developed to process organic waste efficiently while meeting increasingly stringent environmental standards,” he said. Mion said the technology is centred on biocells, enclosed and watertight structures with aerated floors, where temperature, oxygen and moisture are continuously monitored and controlled through the proprietary MVT software platform. This ensures fast, consistent biostabilisation and biodrying processes regardless of external weather conditions. For Tadros, the composting technology broadens the range of solutions available to Australian customers. “They bring in-vessel composting, or tunnel composting, which is available here in the Australian market already, but only maybe a handful of companies offer this technology,” he said. “To have another company offer it will bring more competition.” One feature that stood out to Tadros was MVT’s ability to deliver composting systems for operations of different sizes. “They can offer modular small plants, doing some composting inside a container, and containerised modular composting plants for small operators,” he said. “They can do the small modular for small players, and they can do the very large projects.” 34 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEP 2026

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

// Organics

Biofilters use naturally occurring microorganisms to reduce atmospheric emissions. Image: MVT

Rather than adopting a one-size-fits-all approach, Mion said MVT® customises each installation according to local waste characteristics, processing capacity, regulatory requirements and future expansion plans. This makes the technology suitable for both new facilities and upgrades to existing composting plants. During a visit to Italy, Tadros toured one of MVT’s large facilities outside Rome and also pointed to projects the company has delivered in Singapore. He said the company’s experience demonstrates its ability to work across a range of applications while providing technology suited to both emerging operators and large-scale facilities. “Our solutions stand out for their high level of automation, energy efficiency and process reliability,” said Mion.

Integrated odour control and automation Odour management forms a core part of MVT’s engineering approach. Rather than treating emissions as a separate process, the company incorporates automated air extraction and treatment throughout the facility. “Effective odour management begins with controlling airflow throughout the entire facility,” said Mion. Process air is continuously extracted from waste reception areas, composting biocells and processing buildings to ensure odorous air remains contained during every stage of treatment. The extracted air then passes through combinations of scrubbers, biofilters and other treatment systems selected to suit each application. Mion explained that scrubbers remove pollutants and odorous compounds through physico-chemical absorption, while biofilters use naturally occurring microorganisms to reduce atmospheric emissions. “The entire process is continuously monitored and automatically controlled, allowing airflow rates and treatment performance to be optimised in real time while minimising energy consumption and ensuring Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

consistently high environmental performance,” he said. Automation is another defining feature of the technology. MVT’s proprietary software integrates sensors, PLCs and a dedicated control platform to monitor and manage composting, biostabilisation, biodrying and exhaust air treatment processes in real time. The control system continuously monitors temperature, oxygen concentration, airflow and moisture before automatically adjusting operating conditions to maintain optimum biological activity. This reduces operator intervention, improves process consistency, and minimises the risk of human error. Continuous monitoring also supports predictive maintenance by identifying potential issues before they affect production, helping reduce downtime and extend equipment life. Remote monitoring and teleservice functions allow MVT engineers to provide technical assistance regardless of plant location. Mion said automation also optimises energy consumption and resource utilisation while helping operators lower operating costs over the life of the plant. “The MVT software therefore represents one of the key differentiating elements of our technology,” he said. “It combines automation, sustainability, operational reliability and high process performance within a single, integrated management system.” The technology also supports material and energy recovery through compost Refuse-Derived Fuel production, while reducing waste volumes and maintaining high environmental performance through emission, odour and leachate control.

Tailoring technology for Australian conditions MVT’s experience delivering projects across Europe, Asia and other international markets has reinforced the importance of designing facilities around local operating conditions rather than replicating existing plants.

“Successful waste treatment facilities cannot simply replicate existing solutions. They must be designed around these local conditions,” said Mion. He said climate, waste composition, regulations, operator experience and community expectations all influence plant design. For Australia, this means developing facilities capable of delivering reliable operation under local conditions while remaining flexible enough to adapt as regulations and market requirements evolve. The company’s engineering capability is supported by an integrated manufacturing facility covering about 40,000 square metres where steel fabrication and final plant assembly are completed under direct quality control. An additional 6,000 square metres of production space is being added to support growing international demand. While the partnership is still in its early stages, Vastum Engineering is already pursuing Australian opportunities. “We signed this year’s exclusivity agreement and we are bidding for a couple of opportunities at the moment,” said Tadros. “One of them is odour management of a scrubber system for a transfer station.” Tadros said the business has been built around collaboration with specialist partners and this now includes MVT. “The whole idea of collaboration is based on having the experts to contribute, so when we secure a large organic composting project, we have all the pieces ready,” he said. Mion also sees openings as investment in Australia’s resource recovery infrastructure continues. “We see strong opportunities for composting systems, advanced odour control technologies, automated process management and integrated air treatment solutions,” he said. AUG/SEP 2026 INSIDEWASTE 35

Equipment News //

SKALA Environmental Spotlights the ScreenPOD Range AS AUSTRALIA’S WASTE AND RECYCLING SECTORS face tightening regulatory frameworks, escalating landfill levies, and a push toward circular economies, operators are under pressure to achieve cleaner fractions at higher volumes. Success on-site no longer hinges on sheer throughput; it requires high-efficiency, targeted separation technologies that can handle Australia’s punishing environmental conditions. As the Australian dealer for ScreenPOD, SKALA Environmental has spent years matching local processing challenges with global best practice. To help local operators capture hidden value in their waste streams while maintaining strict environmental compliance, SKALA is throwing a fresh spotlight on four foundational pillars of the ScreenPOD portfolio: waterbaths, airvacs, mobile picking stations, and dust cannons.

ScreenPOD Waterbaths: defeating density separations For operators processing Construction and Demolition (C&D) waste, commercial streams, or skip waste, heavy-vs-light separation is notoriously difficult. ScreenPOD Waterbaths provide an automated, efficient answer to density separation. By utilising the natural buoyancy of processed materials, the Waterbath isolates high-density aggregates from low-density contaminants like wood, plastics, foil, and organics. As material enters the bath, heavy fractions sink to a heavy-duty discharge conveyor, emerging as a clean, high-value recycled aggregate product. Simultaneously, floating ‘lights’ are skimmed off the top. This simple, robust process eliminates manual sorting bottlenecks, protects downstream crushing equipment from

contamination, and turns mixed waste into a premium, marketable resource.

ScreenPOD Airvacs: precision ‘lights’ extraction When it comes to separating plastics, paper, and film from compost, biomass, or trommel fines, air density separation is simple, effective and value for money. The ScreenPOD Airvac series – including the AV4, AV9, and AV12 electric models – delivers precise extraction. It works by generating an adjustable, high-velocity vacuum stream right at material transfer points or conveyor drop-offs. It pulls lightweight contaminants directly out of the falling material stream before they can contaminate the finished product. Because the Airvac systems are compact The Waterbath isolates high-density aggregates from low-density contaminants like wood, plastics, foil, and organics. Images: SKALA

36 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEP 2026

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

// Equipment News

The Mobile Picking Station can extract up to six distinct material types in a single pass.

and available in efficient electric configurations, they can be retrofitted seamlessly into existing mobile or static processing lines. For organics processors, this means achieving the ultra-low contamination thresholds required for high-grade compost and soil conditioners.

ScreenPOD Mobile Picking Stations: safety meets recovery While automation does the heavy lifting, manual quality control remains an essential in many recycling operations. The ScreenPOD SPS123M Mobile Picking Station bridges the gap, providing an all-encompassing, comfortable, and safe platform where operators can extract up to six distinct material types in a single pass. Engineered with site mobility in mind, the ScreenPOD range features a wheeled axle and fifth-wheel coupling for quick relocation around expansive sites. Material is fed via a wide, variable-speed picking belt into an air-conditioned, weatherproof cabin equipped with anti-slip flooring, heating, and windows that flood the workspace with natural light. The station integrates an inline air-knife blower to strip out lightweight plastics before the belt enters the cabin, alongside an integrated overband magnet at the discharge point to automatically pull out ferrous metals. It is an all-in-one recovery ecosystem that reduces landfill disposal costs while maximising safety.

“The ScreenPOD range features a wheeled axle and fifth-wheel coupling for quick relocation around expansive sites” mist (droplets between 10 and 150 microns). An internal fan disperses this mist across a 45-metre radius with a 350-degree automatic slew. Because the water droplets match the physical size of airborne dust particulates, they bind instantly on

contact, bringing the dust safely to the ground without pooling or oversaturating the site. With an on-board genset, track-frame options, and a 2,500L water tank, it provides self-contained protection for personnel and local air quality.

ScreenPOD Telescopic Dust Cannons: advanced site mitigation Environmental compliance is not just about what you recover; it is about how you manage a site’s footprint. With urban encroachment placing recycling facilities closer to communities, dust suppression is a critical operational priority. The ScreenPOD S45 and S65 Dust Cannons offer heavy-duty dust mitigation designed for recycling environments. The system pressurises water through fine jet nozzles to create an atomised Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

The Dust Cannon pressurises water through fine jet nozzles to create an atomised mist.

AUG/SEP 2026 INSIDEWASTE 37

Consultant’s Directory //

CONSULTANTS AT FOREFRONT OF INDUSTRY CHANGE Welcome to the 2026 Consultant’s Registry, a comprehensive guide to consultants in the resource recovery/waste sector.

Image:insta_photos/shutterstock.com

38 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEP 2026

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

THE AUSTRALIAN WASTE AND RESOURCE RECOVERY sector is evolving at a fast pace. As governments pursue circular ecomy targets, businesses seek sustainable operating models, and communities demand better environmental outcomes, the need for informed, practical advice is becoming paramount in a boardroom’s decision-making processes. Behind many of the industry’s successful projects are specialist consultants who help organisations navigate technical, regulatory and commercial challenges while identifying paths for invation and growth. From strategic planning and procurement through to infrastructure design, landfill engineering, waste auditing, environmental approvals and resource recovery, consultants provide the expertise needed to turn challenges into practical solutions. Their work supports local councils, state governments,

private operators, manufacturers, developers and infrastructure projects, ensuring investment decisions are backed by technical kwledge and an understanding of Australia’s changing policy landscape. The pace of change across the sector continues to accelerate. New recycling techlogies, evolving product stewardship schemes, decarbonisation initiatives, organics processing, advanced resource recovery facilities and changing market expectations are reshaping the way waste is managed. At the same time, organisations are expected to deliver better environmental, social and financial outcomes while maintaining compliance with increasingly sophisticated regulations. Experienced consultants play a vital role in helping clients manage these competing priorities with confidence. The Inside Waste Waste and Recycling

Consultants Directory has been developed as a practical reference guide for organisations seeking specialist expertise across Australia’s waste and resource recovery sector. Whether you are planning new infrastructure, reviewing collection services, developing a circular ecomy strategy, undertaking environmental assessments or seeking independent technical advice, this directory connects decisionmakers with consultancies that offer a diverse range of skills and services. As Australia’s leading publication dedicated to the waste and resource recovery industry, Inside Waste is proud to showcase the consultants helping shape the sector’s future. We see this directory as a valuable resource for building partnerships, sharing expertise and supporting the projects that will drive Australia’s transition towards a more sustainable, resilient and circular ecomy.

THE 2026 WASTE CONSULTANT’S REGISTRY IS POWERED BY

Specialist advice, national impact

For more than two decades, strategic environmental consultants Blue Environment have been helping governments, industry and businesses address complex waste, resource recovery and circular economy challenges across Australia. Based in Melbourne and operating nationally, the independent consultancy has built its reputation on rigorous analysis, practical advice and long-term client relationships. Nearly 80 per cent of Blue Environment’s work over the past year has come from repeat clients – a reflection of the confidence clients place in its advice and delivery. “We decided at the outset that our main marketing effort would be doing great work and building a reputation for it” says Director Dr Joe Pickin. “It took a while, and occasionally our financial fingers get burned, but it’s worked out pretty well.” For a team of 12, Blue Environment delivers the capability and reach of a much larger consultancy. Directors Joe Pickin and Kyle O’Farrell remain closely involved in project delivery, giving clients direct access to decades of experience, while a multidisciplinary team provides expertise spanning strategy, policy, planning, stakeholder engagement, education, market development, life cycle assessment, carbon reporting, material flow analysis and data analytics. The company is equally comfortable supporting the development of national policy, undertaking detailed technical analysis or supporting local implementation. That breadth is underpinned by a collaborative culture and a strong focus on quality. As Principal Environmental Scientist Lisa McLeod explains, “I work for Blue Environment because we care about the quality of our work and the way we work together. Senior people stay closely involved, we take the time

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

to get the detail right, and we turn complex analysis into clear advice that clients can rely on. We also have a fantastic, supportive culture, which makes the work even more rewarding.” Recent projects include the Australian Government’s National Waste and Resource Recovery Report, the annual Plastic Flows and Fates reports (State and National), APCO’s packaging consumption and recovery report, prioritising actions for Western Australia’s Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Strategy 2030, Green Industries SA’s Circular Economy Resource Recovery Report, market and material flow studies for the Battery Stewardship Council and the Vinyl Council of Australia, work for Veolia and Cleanaway, circular economy roadmaps, management strategies, options analyses and kerbside transition planning for councils across Australia, and best-practice waste audit guidance for multiple state governments Blue Environment recognises that the best outcomes are not always delivered in isolation. The company regularly partners with complementary specialist consultancies, assembling teams with the right expertise for each project and giving clients access to broader capability while retaining the responsiveness and accountability of a specialist adviser. Beyond project delivery, Blue Environment actively contributes to the advancement of the sector through applied research, publications, conference presentations and training. As a long-standing contributor to the Waste Management and Resource Recovery Association of Australia (WMRR), the team supports industry capability through initiatives including delivery of the WMRR WARR Foundations program. Director Kyle O’Farrell explains “We do what we do because we care about better environmental outcomes, not just the next project. Independent, honest advice is the whole point of what we do, and we think it has earned us trust over time.” As Australia’s waste and circular economy sector continues to evolve, Blue Environment remains committed to providing independent, evidence-based advice that helps clients make informed decisions with confidence.

blueenvironment.com.au

AUG/SEP 2026 INSIDEWASTE 39

Consultant’s Directory //

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

Arup

200+

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

Australian Environmental Auditors Pty Ltd

Less than 50

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

Crown Waste Solutions

Less than 50

10% to 25%

76% to 90%

EMM Consulting Pty Ltd

200+

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

EnviroCom Australia

Less than 50

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

GHD Pty Ltd

200+

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

KPMG

50+

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

REMONDIS IMS

100+

10% to 25%

76% to 90%

ADE Consulting Group

50+

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

ALS Environmental

200+

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

APC Waste Consultants Pty Ltd

Less than 50

90%+

51% to 75%

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

Arcadis Australia Pacific Pty Ltd

Less than 50

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

Arup

200+

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

ATC Williams Pty Ltd

Less than 50

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

Australian Environmental Auditors Pty Ltd

Less than 50

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

Bajwa EnviroConsult Pty Ltd

Less than 50

26% to 50%

Beatty Hughes & Associates

Less than 50

Breen Resources

50+

Colin Biggers & Paisley Lawyers

200+

Colliers

Less than 10

Core Environmental Projects

Less than 50

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

COWMAN Projects & Advisory

Less than 10

10% to 25%

Crown Waste Solutions

Less than 50

10% to 25%

76% to 90%

Dartmouth Consulting

Less than 50

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

•

Delorean Corporation

Less than 50

10% to 25%

76% to 90%

•

Earth Science Information Systems Pty Ltd

Less than 50

10% to 25%

EC Focus

Less than 10

Ekistica

Less than 50

26% to 50%

• •

Elephants Foot Consulting Pty Ltd

Less than 50

10% to 25%

76% to 90%

• • •

EMM Consulting Pty Ltd

200+

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

Envo

Less than 50

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

•

ENV Solutions

50+

51% to 75%

• •

Enviro Admin Pty Ltd

Less than 10

EnviroCom Australia

Less than 50

51% to 75%

Envirodyne Group Pty Ltd

Less than 10

10% to 25%

Environmental Earth Sciences International (EESI)

Less than 50

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

Environmental Treatment Solutions (ETS)

20+

10% to 25%

76% to 90%

GHD Pty Ltd

200+

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

Giles Perryman

Less than 50

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

Green Yakka

Less than 10

26% to 50%

GreenTec Consulting

Less than 50

51% to 75%

HRL Techlogy Group

100+

10% to 25%

Impact Environmental Consulting

Less than 10

90%+

Infrastructure Solutions

Less than 10

26% to 50%

InSitu Advisory Pty Ltd

Less than 50

10% to 25%

JB Consulting

Less than 10

KPMG

50+

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

Marmaduke Project

Less than 10

26% to 50%

MGB Environmental Consultants Pty Ltd

Less than 10

Miltek Waste Solutions

Less than 10

10% to 25%

MRA Consulting Group

50+

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

Nationwide Waste Solutions

50+

NULOOP

Less than 10

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

Oliver Batchelour

Less than 50

Pact Renewables Pty Ltd

Less than 10

Pharmacycle

Less than 50

QPRC

Less than 50

•

• •

• • •

Environmental/ greenhouse management, reporting & compliance

10% to 25%

Environmental approvals

10% to 25%

End-to-end project management

Private sector

200+

Ecomic evaluation & modelling

Federal Government

ALS Environmental

COMPANY NAME

Design & engineering of facilities

State Government

Main service areas

Local Government

Sectors serviced

Education, training & community consultation

Number of staff

ACT

•

• •

•

• • • •

• • •

90%+

• •

10% to 25%

•

10% to 25%

• •

•

• • •

NSW

40 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEP 2026

26% to 50%

76% to 90%

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

• •

• • • •

• • •

•

• •

• • • •

•

26% to 50% 26% to 50% 26% to 50%

51% to 75% 26% to 50%

• • •

• • • •

90%+ 10% to 25%

•

10% to 25% 10% to 25%

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

76% to 90%

10% to 25%

•

76% to 90%

• •

26% to 50%

• •

•

• •

•

• • • • • • • •

• • • •

• • •

•

• • • •

26% to 50%

•

90%+ 76% to 90%

•

• •

10% to 25%

• •

• • •

10% to 25% 10% to 25%

•

10% to 25%

• • • • • •

• • •

•

• •

•

90%+ 90%+ 26% to 50%

76% to 90%

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

• •

•

Contact

•

Other

Waste Management Plans (development)

Further Information Waste Management

Waste auditing

Training

Techlogy/ infrastructure reviews & evaluation

Strategy, policy & planning

Procurement tender development & evaluation, contract management

Logistics collection & transfer studies

Landfill - design, operation, gas, closure, rehabilitation etc

Hazardous waste reporting

Main service areas

Laboratory analysis

zachary.chataway@alsglobal.com

•

shaun.rainford@arup.com sthurlow@envaud.com.au

•

• • •

Product stewardship

ims-sales@remondis.com.au

•

Waste classification

andrew.mitchell@ade.group

Laboratory analysis

zachary.chataway@alsglobal.com

sales@crownwastesolutions.com.au

• • • • • • • • •

•

• • •

• •

• • • • • •

• • •

• • • •

•

• •

•

• •

enquiries@envirocom.com.au

• • • •

•

sydmail@ghd.com sdegagny@kpmg.com.au

admin@aprince.com.au aus@arcadis.com shaun.rainford@arup.com brisbane@atcwilliams.com.au sthurlow@envaud.com.au

•

info@beconsult.com.au Planning and environmental legal advice

admin@beattyhughes.com.au

Legal services

katherine.pickerd@cbp.com.au

natalie@breen.com.au

•

aus.tt.edbris@colliers.com

• •

•

• • •

• •

• • • • •

• • • • • • •

• • • • •

• • •

•

• • • •

• • •

•

• • •

• • • •

• • •

enquiries@core-ep.com.au nick@cowman.com.au sales@crownwastesolutions.com.au admin@dartmouthconsulting.com.au Development and operation of bioenergy and renewable gas infrastructure (organic waste processing, biomethane production)

info@deloreancorporation.com.au

Environmental data management

catherinehansen@escis.com.au

Waste to energy, anaerobic digestion

enquiries@ekistica.com.au

advisory@ecfocus.com.au consulting@elephantsfoot.com.au info@emmconsulting.com.au

•

• •

info@envo.com.au info@envsolutions.com.au Environmental monitoring

shane@enviroadmin.com.au enquiries@envirocom.com.au info@envirodynegroup.com info@eesigroup.com

• • •

• •

• • • •

• •

• • •

• • • • • • • • •

• • •

• •

•

• •

• • •

• •

•

Product stewardship

sales@envirotreat.com.au

Waste data management

giles@askwm.com

Zero waste consulting; food waste consulting; sustainable event waste management; waste education and behaviour change; bin monitoring and contamination reduction; waste sorting and diversion reporting.

enquiries@greenyakka.com.au

Combustion chemistry of waste and ash

nmiller@hrl.com.au

sydmail@ghd.com

robert.dale@greenyakka.com.au

thomas@impactenviro.com.au

• • • • •

• •

•

• •

• • • • •

•

admin@infrasolutions.com.au Facility valuations

alan@insituadvisory.com

Greenhouse gas measurement and use of the gases such as methane

johnmblair2007@gmail.com sdegagny@kpmg.com.au rupert@marmadukeproject.com.au greggornall@mgbconsult.net

•

operations@miltek.com.au office@mraconsulting.com.au marketing@nationwidewaste.com.au

•

• •

•

• •

patrick@nuloop.com.au oliver@foresightenvironmental.com info@pactrenewables.com

•

logan.ang@pharmacycle.com.au https://www.qprc.nsw.gov.au/home

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

AUG/SEP 2026 INSIDEWASTE 41

Consultant’s Directory //

Less than 10

26% to 50%

REDUCE REUSE

Less than 10

REMONDIS IMS

100+

10% to 25%

Resolve Environmental

Less than 50

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

Resource Hub

Less than 50

51% to 75%

Resource Recovery Australia

Less than 10

90%+

ReturningOrganics To Soils

Less than 10

10% to 25%

Second Life Solar Pty Ltd

Less than 10

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

Senversa

Less than 50

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd

Less than 50

26% to 50%

SoilSource Pty Ltd

Less than 10

10% to 25%

Summit Enviro Consulting PTY Ltd

Less than 10

10% to 25%

Surearth Pty Ltd

Less than 10

10% to 25%

Talis Consultants

100+

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

TerraCycle

Less than 50

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

Tidal Circular

Less than 10

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

UTL Utilities

Less than 10

76% to 90%

10% to 25%

Vm3 Zero

Less than 10

10% to 25%

Zephyr Environmental Pty Ltd

Less than 50

10% to 25%

WSP

100+

10% to 25%

ALS Environmental

200+

10% to 25%

Ekistica

Less than 50

26% to 50%

GHD Pty Ltd

200+

KPMG MasterPlan

90%+

• •

•

Environmental/ greenhouse management, reporting & compliance

•

• • •

•

• •

90%+ 10% to 25%

76% to 90% 26% to 50% 26% to 50%

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

• • • •

• • •

51% to 75% 10% to 25%

• •

•

51% to 75%

• •

• • •

26% to 50%

•

51% to 75% 51% to 75%

• •

• • • •

26% to 50% 10% to 25%

51% to 75% 76% to 90%

• •

• 10% to 25%

26% to 50%

•

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

50+

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

Less than 50

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

Resource Recovery Australia

Less than 10

90%+

SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd

Less than 50

26% to 50%

ADE Consulting Group

50+

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

ALS Environmental

200+

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

APC Waste Consultants Pty Ltd

Less than 50

90%+

51% to 75%

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

Arcadis Australia Pacific Pty Ltd

Less than 50

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

Arup

200+

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

ATC Williams Pty Ltd

Less than 50

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

Bajwa EnviroConsult Pty Ltd

Less than 50

26% to 50%

Closed Loop

Less than 50

26% to 50%

Colin Biggers & Paisley Lawyers

200+

76% to 90%

10% to 25%

Colliers

Less than 10

Core Environmental Projects

Less than 50

CQ Rentals Australia Pty Ltd trading as ARRG Waste

Less than 50

Crown Waste Solutions

Less than 50

10% to 25%

76% to 90%

Dartmouth Consulting

Less than 50

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

Drapper Environmental Consultants

Less than 10

10% to 25%

Earth Science Information Systems Pty Ltd

Less than 50

10% to 25%

Elephants Foot Consulting Pty Ltd

Less than 50

10% to 25%

76% to 90%

EMM Consulting Pty Ltd

200+

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

Envo

Less than 50

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

ENV Solutions

50+

51% to 75%

EnviroCom Australia

Less than 50

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

Environmental Earth Sciences International (EESI)

Less than 50

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

Ethos Resources

Less than 10

76% to 90%

Fotra Group Consulting

Less than 10

GHD Pty Ltd

200+

26% to 50%

GreenTec Consulting

Less than 50

51% to 75%

Harbak

Less than 10

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

HRL Techlogy Group

100+

10% to 25%

76% to 90%

I'm Plastic Free

Less than 10

10% to 25%

KPMG

50+

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

MasterPlan

Less than 50

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

Milne Legal

Less than 10

10% to 25%

MRA Consulting Group

50+

26% to 50%

Nationwide Waste Solutions

50+

Nexus Landfill Gas Pty Ltd

Less than 10

26% to 50%

Phronis Consulting

Less than 10

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

51% to 75%

QLD

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

• • • • • •

• • •

• • • • • • • • • •

• • • • • • • • • • •

• • •

26% to 50%

26% to 50% 10% to 25%

• • •

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

•

• • • •

• •

90%+ 10% to 25%

•

10% to 25%

• • •

•

• • • • •

• • •

•

• •

• • •

• • • • •

•

• •

10% to 25%

76% to 90% 10% to 25%

26% to 50%

• •

• • • •

•

10% to 25% 10% to 25%

10% to 25%

• •

• • •

• •

• • • •

26% to 50%

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

•

90%+

10% to 25%

•

• •

76% to 90%

42 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEP 2026

Environmental approvals

End-to-end project management

10% to 25%

100+

Ratio Consultants

Ecomic evaluation & modelling

Federal Government

10% to 25%

Ramboll Australia

Design & engineering of facilities

State Government

10% to 25%

Main service areas Private sector

Local Government

COMPANY NAME

Sectors serviced

Education, training & community consultation

Number of staff

•

• • • • • • •

• • • • • • • • • •

• • • • • • • • • • •

•

• • • • • • • • • • •

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

•

• •

• • •

•

• • •

• •

•

• • •

• • • • • •

• • •

• • • • • •

• •

• • •

•

• •

•

mail@ratio.com.au Sustainable recycling & recovery

sales@mahajan-group.com

Product stewardship

ims-sales@remondis.com.au

Environmental monitoring, construction quality assurance (cqa)

info@resolveenvironmental.com.au

Waste levy leaders

hello@resourcehub.com.au

Design of resource recovery centres

ally.glendenning@resourcerecovery. org.au as above

• • •

hello@secondlifesolar.com.au enquiries@senversa.com.au Due diligence

sydney-admin@slrconsulting.com

Affiliate referral service of clean soil

andresg@soilsource.com.au

Expert witness

andrew@summitenviro.com.au info@surearth.com.au enquiries@talisconsultants.com.au anzsales@terracycle.com

Circular ecomy strategy & metrics, circular business models, end-to-end circular procurement/demand aggregation, recycled content market building and analysis, circular ecomy policy/legislation/regulation analysis,

• •

Contact

Other

Waste Management Plans (development)

• • •

• •

•

• • • • • • • • •

•

mrevault@ramboll.com

•

• • • •

•

Further Information Waste Management

Waste auditing

Training

Techlogy/ infrastructure reviews & evaluation

Strategy, policy & planning

Procurement tender development & evaluation, contract management

Logistics collection & transfer studies

Landfill - design, operation, gas, closure, rehabilitation etc

Hazardous waste reporting

Main service areas

•

• •

justin@tidalcircular.com.au hello@utl-utilities.com.au stuart.godwin@vm3purefier.com peter.taylor@zephyrenviro.com

•

hossein.ghiasineajd@wsp.com

• • •

•

• • • •

•

• • • •

•

• • • • • • • • •

• • • • • • • • • •

• • • •

• • •

• •

•

• • • • • • •

• • • • •

• • •

• •

• • • • •

• • • •

Laboratory analysis

zachary.chataway@alsglobal.com

Waste to energy, anaerobic digestion

enquiries@ekistica.com.au sydmail@ghd.com sdegagny@kpmg.com.au

Development approvals

plan@masterplan.com.au

Design of resource recovery centres

ally.glendenning@resourcerecovery. org.au

• •

•

Due diligence

sydney-admin@slrconsulting.com

•

Waste classification

info@ade.group

Laboratory analysis

zachary.chataway@alsglobal.com

• • • • • •

admin@aprince.com.au aus@arcadis.com shaun.rainford@arup.com brisbane@atcwilliams.com.au info@beconsult.com.au info@closedloop.com.au Legal services

katherine.pickerd@cbp.com.au aus.tt.edbris@colliers.com

• •

•

• •

• • •

• •

•

• •

•

• • • • •

• • •

• •

•

• • • •

•

enquiries@core-ep.com.au tony henningsen

• • •

sales@crownwastesolutions.com.au admin@dartmouthconsulting.com.au info@drapperconsultants.com Environmental data management

•

• • •

• •

catherinehansen@escis.com.au consulting@elephantsfoot.com.au info@emmconsulting.com.au

•

info@envo.com.au info@envsolutions.com.au enquiries@envirocom.com.au info@eesigroup.com

• • • • •

• • • • • •

• • • • • • • •

• • • • • •

• • •

•

• • •

• • • • • •

•

• • • • • • •

admin@ethosresources.com.au Schools, camps, property and corporate services

executiveagent@ fotragroupconsultingeco.com sydmail@ghd.com admin@greentecconsulting.com.au keiran@harbak.com.au

Combustion chemistry of waste and ash

nmiller@hrl.com.au

Micro- and naplastics in consumer products tranings

info@implasticfree.com

Development approvals

plan@masterplan.com.au

Legal services

admin@milnelegal.com.au

sdegagny@kpmg.com.au

office@mraconsulting.com.au marketing@nationwidewaste.com.au

• •

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

• •

Optimisation/third party gas system audits and migration management

•

aidan@nexuslfg.com enquiries@phronis.com.au

AUG/SEP 2026 INSIDEWASTE 43

Consultant’s Directory //

10% to 25%

Resolve Environmental

Less than 50

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

Resource Hub

Less than 50

51% to 75%

Resource Recovery Australia

Less than 10

90%+

Senversa

Less than 50

26% to 50%

SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd

Less than 50

26% to 50%

Talis Consultants

100+

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

UTL Utilities

Less than 10

76% to 90%

10% to 25%

Zephyr Environmental Pty Ltd

Less than 50

10% to 25%

WSP

100+

10% to 25%

ALS Environmental

200+

10% to 25%

Arcadis Australia Pacific Pty Ltd

Less than 50

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

Arup

200+

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

ATC Williams Pty Ltd

Less than 50

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

Australian Environmental Auditors Pty Ltd

Less than 50

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

Delorean Corporation

Less than 50

10% to 25%

76% to 90%

EMM Consulting Pty Ltd

200+

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

Envo

Less than 50

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

GHD Pty Ltd

200+

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

KESAB environmental solutions

Less than 10

26% to 50%

KPMG

50+

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

MasterPlan

Less than 50

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

Ratio Consultants

Less than 10

Rawtec

Less than 10

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

REMONDIS IMS

100+

10% to 25%

76% to 90%

SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd

Less than 50

26% to 50%

51% to 75%

Terra Firma Laboritories

100+

26% to 50%

76% to 90%

Zephyr Environmental Pty Ltd

Less than 50

10% to 25%

Senversa

Less than 50

26% to 50%

WSP

100+

10% to 25%

ALS Environmental

200+

ATC Williams Pty Ltd

Less than 50

Australian Environmental Auditors Pty Ltd

90%+

26% to 50% 26% to 50%

10% to 25%

51% to 75% 51% to 75%

10% to 25%

•

76% to 90%

10% to 25%

• • • • • •

• •

• • •

•

• •

• • •

• •

•

• • •

• •

• • • •

• •

• • •

• •

•

• •

• • •

• •

• • • •

• •

•

• •

76% to 90%

SA 51% to 75%

51% to 75% 10% to 25%

26% to 50% 26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50% 51% to 75% 90%+

• •

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

Less than 50

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

Cradle Coast Waste Services, part of Dulverton Waste Mangement

Less than 10

10% to 25%

Earth Science Information Systems Pty Ltd

Less than 50

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

Ekistica

Less than 50

26% to 50%

•

• • •

• •

•

• • •

• • • •

EMM Consulting Pty Ltd

200+

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

GHD Pty Ltd

200+

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

Hart Bioenergy Pty Ltd

Less than 10

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

KPMG

50+

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

Milca

Less than 10

•

MRA Consulting Group

50+

MRA Consulting Group

Less than 50

Ratio Consultants

Less than 10

•

• •

• • • • •

• • • •

TAS

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

•

• • •

•

• • •

90%+ 10% to 25%

• •

26% to 50%

VIC ADE Consulting Group

50+

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

All Environmental Concepts

Less than 10

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

ALS Environmental

200+

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

APC Waste Consultants Pty Ltd

Less than 50

90%+

51% to 75%

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

ARC Environmental

Less than 10

26% to 50%

Arcadis Australia Pacific Pty Ltd

Less than 50

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

Arup

200+

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

ATC Williams Pty Ltd

Less than 50

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

Australian Environmental Auditors Pty Ltd

Less than 50

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

Bajwa EnviroConsult Pty Ltd

Less than 50

26% to 50%

Blue Environment Pty Ltd

Less than 50

10% to 25%

Circular Futures Group

Less than 10

Cirque du Soil

Less than 10

26% to 50%

Closed Loop

Less than 50

26% to 50%

44 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEP 2026

•

76% to 90% 10% to 25%

•

26% to 50%

•

• •

• • •

• •

•

• • •

•

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

90%+

•

• • •

76% to 90% 10% to 25%

90%+

Environmental/ greenhouse management, reporting & compliance

10% to 25%

Environmental approvals

Federal Government

100+

End-to-end project management

State Government

Less than 10

REMONDIS IMS

Ecomic evaluation & modelling

Local Government

Ratio Consultants

COMPANY NAME

Design & engineering of facilities

Main service areas Private sector

Sectors serviced

Education, training & community consultation

Number of staff

•

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

• • •

• • • • •

• • • •

• • • • • •

• • • • •

• • •

• • • • • • • •

Waste Management Plans (development)

• • • • • • • •

Contact

• •

Other

•

Further Information Waste Management

Waste auditing

Training

Techlogy/ infrastructure reviews & evaluation

•

• • •

Strategy, policy & planning

Procurement tender development & evaluation, contract management

Logistics collection & transfer studies

Landfill - design, operation, gas, closure, rehabilitation etc

Hazardous waste reporting

Main service areas

Product stewardship

ims-sales@remondis.com.au

mail@ratio.com.au Environmental monitoring, construction quality assurance (cqa)

info@resolveenvironmental.com.au

Waste levy leaders

hello@resourcehub.com.au

Design of resource recovery centres

ally.glendenning@resourcerecovery. org.au

Due diligence

sydney-admin@slrconsulting.com

enquiries@senversa.com.au enquiries@talisconsultants.com.au hello@utl-utilities.com.au peter.taylor@zephyrenviro.com

• • •

hossein.ghiasineajd@wsp.com Laboratory analysis

• • •

•

• •

•

• •

• • •

zachary.chataway@alsglobal.com aus@arcadis.com shaun.rainford@arup.com brisbane@atcwilliams.com.au sthurlow@envaud.com.au

• • •

•

• • • • • • • •

•

• • •

Development and operation of bioenergy and renewable gas infrastructure (organic waste processing, biomethane production)

•

info@deloreancorporation.com.au info@emmconsulting.com.au

• • •

•

• •

•

• • • • •

• • • • • • •

• • • • • • • • •

info@envo.com.au sydmail@ghd.com admin@kesab.asn.au sdegagny@kpmg.com.au Development approvals

plan@masterplan.com.au

Circular ecomy

info@rawtec.com.ai

Product stewardship

ims-sales@remondis.com.au

Due diligence

sydney-admin@slrconsulting.com

Geotechincal and geosynthetic testing. Liner integrity inspeciton/leak detection surveys

webenquiry@terrafirmalabs.com.au

mail@ratio.com.au

peter.taylor@zephyrenviro.com

• •

•

• •

•

enquiries@senversa.com.au hossein.ghiasineajd@wsp.com Laboratory analysis

• •

•

zachary.chataway@alsglobal.com brisbane@atcwilliams.com.au sthurlow@envaud.com.au

• •

•

• • •

•

• •

• • •

•

admin

•

Environmental data management

catherinehansen@escis.com.au

Waste to energy, anaerobic digestion

enquiries@ekistica.com.au info@emmconsulting.com.au

•

sydmail@ghd.com contact@hartbioenergy.com.au sdegagny@kpmg.com.au hello@malva.com.au office@mraconsulting.com.au info@mraconsulting.com.au

• • • • • • • •

•

• •

•

• •

•

• •

•

mail@ratio.com.au Waste classification

info@ade.group

Litter audits

michelle@allenvironmentalconcepts. com.au

Laboratory analysis

zachary.chataway@alsglobal.com

•

admin@aprince.com.au Environmental compliance; contaminated land consulting

• • •

•

• • •

•

admin@arcenvironmental.com.au aus@arcadis.com shaun.rainford@arup.com brisbane@atcwilliams.com.au sthurlow@envaud.com.au

•

• • •

•

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

•

info@beconsult.com.au Evidence-based circular ecomy solutions underpinned by extensive national and state waste and resource recovery data and reporting, material flow analysis, life cycle assessment, multi-criteria analysis, feasibility studies, business case development and industry thought leadership.

blue@blueenvironment.com.au

Circularity action plans

hello@cirquedusoil.com.au

matt@circularfutures.com.au info@closedloop.com.au

AUG/SEP 2026 INSIDEWASTE 45

Consultant’s Directory //

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

Crown Waste Solutions

Less than 50

10% to 25%

76% to 90%

Dartmouth Consulting

Less than 50

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

Davis Advisory

Less than 10

10% to 25%

Delorean Corporation

Less than 50

10% to 25%

EC Focus

Less than 10

51% to 75%

Elephants Foot Consulting Pty Ltd

Less than 50

10% to 25%

76% to 90%

EMM Consulting Pty Ltd

200+

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

Envo

Less than 50

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

EnviroCom Australia

Less than 50

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

Environmental Earth Sciences International (EESI)

Less than 50

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

Environmental Treatment Solutions (ETS)

20+

10% to 25%

76% to 90%

GHD Pty Ltd

200+

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

GOODSERCLE

Less than 50

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

26% to 50%

Hart Bioenergy Pty Ltd

Less than 10

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

HRL Techlogy Group

100+

10% to 25%

76% to 90%

Infrastructure Solutions

Less than 10

26% to 50%

InSitu Advisory Pty Ltd

Less than 50

10% to 25%

KPMG

50+

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

MRA Consulting Group

50+

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

Oliver Batchelour

Less than 50

Paul Randell

Less than 10

26% to 50%

Pharmacycle

Less than 50

26% to 50%

Phronis Consulting

Less than 10

10% to 25%

Process Environmental

Less than 10

Ramboll Australia

100+

Ratio Consultants

Less than 10

REMONDIS IMS

100+

10% to 25%

Resolve Environmental

Less than 50

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

Resource Recovery Australia

Less than 10

90%+

Second Life Solar Pty Ltd

Less than 10

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

Senversa

Less than 50

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd

Less than 50

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

• •

•

76% to 90%

•

26% to 50%

• •

•

51% to 75% 10% to 25%

76% to 90% 26% to 50%

• • • • • •

•

• •

•

• •

• • • •

• •

• • •

•

• • • • • •

• • •

•

• •

• • •

•

• •

•

• • •

• • • • • •

• • • •

26% to 50%

• • •

90%+ 26% to 50%

26% to 50%

26% to 50% 76% to 90% 90%+

10% to 25%

26% to 50% 90%+

10% to 25%

• • • • • •

10% to 25%

51% to 75% 51% to 75%

10% to 25%

•

76% to 90%

SPM Sustainable Project Management Pty Ltd

Less than 10

10% to 25%

Terra Firma Laboritories

100+

26% to 50%

TerraCycle

Less than 50

26% to 50%

Waste Choice

Less than 10

10% to 25%

90%+

Zephyr Environmental Pty Ltd

Less than 50

10% to 25%

76% to 90%

WSP

100+

10% to 25%

ALS Environmental

200+

10% to 25%

Arcadis Australia Pacific Pty Ltd

Less than 50

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

Arup

200+

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

ATC Williams Pty Ltd

Less than 50

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

Australian Environmental Auditors Pty Ltd

Less than 50

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

Bajwa EnviroConsult Pty Ltd

Less than 50

26% to 50%

Delorean Corporation

Less than 50

Earth Science Information Systems Pty Ltd

Less than 50

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

EMM Consulting Pty Ltd

200+

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

GHD Pty Ltd

200+

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

Giles Perryman

Less than 50

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

HRL Techlogy Group

100+

10% to 25%

76% to 90%

KPMG

50+

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

Lethlean Fire and Environment Pty Ltd

Less than 10

26% to 50%

Ramboll Australia

100+

10% to 25%

26% to 50%

REMONDIS IMS

100+

10% to 25%

76% to 90%

Resolve Environmental

Less than 50

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

SLR Consulting Australia Pty Ltd

Less than 50

26% to 50%

Talis Consultants

100+

51% to 75%

Terra Firma Laboritories

100+

26% to 50%

Zephyr Environmental Pty Ltd

Less than 50

10% to 25%

Senversa

Less than 50

26% to 50%

WSP

100+

10% to 25%

• •

•

• • •

•

• •

51% to 75% 76% to 90%

26% to 50%

10% to 25%

51% to 75%

•

• •

• • •

• •

•

• • •

• • • • • •

51% to 75%

• •

• • •

• •

26% to 50%

•

76% to 90%

•

26% to 50%

26% to 50% 51% to 75% 10% to 25%

• • • •

•

• •

•

10% to 25%

•

• • •

• •

•

76% to 90%

• • •

• •

• • • • • •

76% to 90% 10% to 25%

10% to 25%

• • •

51% to 75%

10% to 25%

•

46 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEP 2026

Environmental/ greenhouse management, reporting & compliance

26% to 50%

Environmental approvals

76% to 90%

Less than 50

End-to-end project management

200+

Core Environmental Projects

Ecomic evaluation & modelling

Colin Biggers & Paisley Lawyers

COMPANY NAME

Design & engineering of facilities

Federal Government

Private sector

Main service areas

State Government

Local Government

Sectors serviced

Education, training & community consultation

Number of staff

51% to 75%

•

• • •

•

• • •

• •

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

• •

• • •

•

• • •

• •

• • • •

•

• • • •

Waste Management Plans (development)

Waste Management

Waste auditing

Training

Techlogy/ infrastructure reviews & evaluation

Strategy, policy & planning

Procurement tender development & evaluation, contract management

•

Legal services

katherine.pickerd@cbp.com.au

• • • •

enquiries@core-ep.com.au sales@crownwastesolutions.com.au admin@dartmouthconsulting.com.au accounts@davisadvisory.com.au Development and operation of bioenergy and renewable gas infrastructure (organic waste processing, biomethane production)

• •

Contact

•

Further Information

Other

• •

Logistics collection & transfer studies

Landfill - design, operation, gas, closure, rehabilitation etc

Hazardous waste reporting

Main service areas

• •

•

• • •

info@deloreancorporation.com.au advisory@ecfocus.com.au consulting@elephantsfoot.com.au info@emmconsulting.com.au

•

info@envo.com.au enquiries@envirocom.com.au info@eesigroup.com

• • • • •

• • • •

• • • • •

• • • •

• • •

Product stewardship

•

sales@envirotreat.com.au sydmail@ghd.com gauri.s@goodsercle.com.au contact@hartbioenergy.com.au

• • •

•

• •

Combustion chemistry of waste and ash

nmiller@hrl.com.au

Facility valuations

alan@insituadvisory.com

admin@infrasolutions.com.au sdegagny@kpmg.com.au office@mraconsulting.com.au

• •

•

• •

• • •

• • • • •

• • •

•

• •

• • •

• •

• • •

• •

• • • •

• • •

•

• • • • •

• • •

•

paul@randellenvironmental.com.au logan.ang@pharmacycle.com.au

• •

enquiries@phronis.com.au leo.oldridge@pe3.com.au mrevault@ramboll.com

• • • • • • •

• •

oliver@foresightenvironmental.com

mail@ratio.com.au Product stewardship

ims-sales@remondis.com.au

Environmental monitoring, construction quality assurance (cqa)

info@resolveenvironmental.com.au

Design of resource recovery centres

ally.glendenning@resourcerecovery. org.au hello@secondlifesolar.com.au enquiries@senversa.com.au

Due diligence

sydney-admin@slrconsulting.com

Geotechincal and geosynthetic testing. Liner integrity inspeciton/leak detection surveys

webenquiry@terrafirmalabs.com.au

info@spm.com.au

• •

anzsales@terracycle.com admin@wastechoice.com.au peter.taylor@zephyrenviro.com

• • • •

hossein.ghiasineajd@wsp.com Laboratory analysis

• • • •

• • •

•

• • •

• • • • •

• • •

•

zachary.chataway@alsglobal.com aus@arcadis.com shaun.rainford@arup.com brisbane@atcwilliams.com.au sthurlow@envaud.com.au

•

• •

• • •

• •

• • •

•

• • • • •

• •

•

• • •

•

• • • •

• •

info@deloreancorporation.com.au

Environmental data management

catherinehansen@escis.com.au info@emmconsulting.com.au

• • • •

•

info@beconsult.com.au Development and operation of bioenergy and renewable gas infrastructure (organic waste processing, biomethane production)

• • •

• • • •

• •

•

sydmail@ghd.com Waste data management

giles@askwm.com

Combustion chemistry of waste and ash

nmiller@hrl.com.au

Fire risk assessment

jill@lethleanfireandenvironment.com.au

Product stewardship

ims-sales@remondis.com.au

Environmental monitoring, construction quality assurance (cqa)

info@resolveenvironmental.com.au

Due diligence

sydney-admin@slrconsulting.com

Geotechincal and geosynthetic testing. Liner integrity inspeciton/leak detection surveys

webenquiry@terrafirmalabs.com.au

sdegagny@kpmg.com.au mrevault@ramboll.com

• • • •

enquiries@talisconsultants.com.au

peter.taylor@zephyrenviro.com

•

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

•

enquiries@senversa.com.au hossein.ghiasineajd@wsp.com

AUG/SEP 2026 INSIDEWASTE 47

Power Your Team with

For a limited time, subscribe to Inside Waste and receive

40% off

your online subscription across Individual to 10-user subscriptions.

Simply scan the QR code and use the code ISW40 at checkout.

// Equipment News

Sycle is committed to maximising resource recovery through responsible recycling and remanufacturing. Images: Focus Enviro

Adding value to every tonne AS AUSTRALIA’S RESOURCE RECOVERY SECTOR continues its transition towards a circular economy, operators are increasingly investing in technologies that not only divert waste from landfill but also create higher-value end products. Victorian resource recovery specialist Sycle is a prime example of this shift.

Produced from recovered timber waste, coloured mulch delivers the environmental benefits of traditional mulch.

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

Headquartered in Avalon, Victoria, Sycle has established itself as one of Australia’s fastest-growing integrated waste management and remanufacturing businesses. Guided by its vision to “make waste valuable,” Sycle transforms recovered materials into high-quality, sustainable products that help build a cleaner and more resilient future.

Delivering on that vision is a commitment to maximising resource recovery through responsible recycling and remanufacturing. By investing in advanced processing technologies and innovative resource recovery infrastructure, Sycle creates lasting environmental, social and economic value, while helping drive Australia’s transition to a circular economy. What differentiates Sycle is its commitment to moving beyond waste collection and landfill diversion. Through investment in advanced recycling and remanufacturing infrastructure, the company is building the capability to process more material annually, positioning itself as a contributor to Victoria’s future circular economy infrastructure. Today, Sycle operates a network of facilities across Victoria, including Avalon, Fyansford and Sunshine. These facilities play a role in recovering materials from construction, demolition, commercial and industrial waste streams, transforming them into high-quality products that support sustainable resource management. The company’s Sunshine operation alone can recover up to 80 per cent of waste material, while the broader business has achieved landfill diversion rates of approximately 90 per cent. Sycle’s operations currently support more than 200 local jobs and manage a fleet of over 1,000 commercial skip bins servicing Victorian industry and communities. With their 2028 target established, Sycle AUG/SEP 2026 INSIDEWASTE 49

Equipment News //

is positioning itself as one of Victoria’s most ambitious recycling and remanufacturing businesses. Through continued investment in advanced resource recovery infrastructure, the company is transforming construction, demolition, commercial and timber waste streams into high-quality, specification-grade recycled products for landscaping, infrastructure and construction applications. One area experiencing strong growth is coloured mulch. Produced from recovered timber waste, coloured mulch delivers the environmental benefits of traditional mulch while offering better visual appeal for commercial landscaping, local government projects, sports fields, road reserves and public spaces. By converting waste timber into a premium landscaping product, Sycle is extending the value chain of recovered materials and creating new market opportunities for recycled resources. To support this growing demand, Sycle recently invested in an advanced EDGE TRC622 ColorPRO colour trommel system, further strengthening its capability to manufacture high-quality coloured mulch at scale. By converting recycled timber into premium coloured mulch, operators can achieve 30 to 70 per cent higher product value than natural mulch. Automated colour trommel systems also

deliver uniform colour application, good throughput and reduced labour costs. “We were well acquainted with Ryan and the Focus Enviro team having dealt with them over the years. We knew that they would not only recommend equipment that would meet our needs but would also provide the high level of service and support going forward,” said Simon Penno, engineering manager, Sycle. Unlike conventional colouring systems, the unit has been purpose-built for mulch colouring applications. The machine combines a large-capacity 12.6m³ (16.5 yards³) feed hopper, complete with forward/reverse feed conveyor, variable speed controls and a 2m x 6.9m (6’ x 22’) long spiral drum to ensure consistent mixing and dye distribution throughout the material. The ColorPRO combines controlled material flow with an intelligent colour application system to produce a consistently vibrant, premium-grade mulch while reducing colourant wastage. Up to 50 per cent less water is required during the colouring process. Using less water also reduces colourant consumption, speeds up drying times and lowers the risks of mould. The result is a high-value product that meets the standards of commercial landscapers, local government and infrastructure projects. Industry data shows that lighter, lower-moisture mulch also delivers freight

savings. With some producers increasing truck payloads from 15 pallets to as many as 20 pallets per load. This not only reduces transport costs but also improves overall productivity. This ColorPro dye trommel offers production rates of 500³/hr enabling Sycle to process large volumes of material efficiently while maintaining good product quality and colour consistency. Its automated colour application and intelligent process controls minimise operator intervention, maximise uptime and delivers a streamlined production process, allowing the business to respond quickly to growing customer demand. “Sycle’s investment in the EDGE ColorPro reflects a broader shift across Australia’s resource recovery sector, where success is increasingly measured not only by the volume of material diverted from landfill, but by the value created from it,” said Ryan McParland, product specialist for Focus Enviro. As demand grows for premium recycled products and sustainable construction materials, investments in advanced processing technologies will become increasingly important. By producing specification-grade, coloured mulch from recovered timber, Sycle is demonstrating how innovation can enhance product quality, strengthen commercial returns and help set a higher benchmark for Australia’s resource recovery industry.

Sycle creates lasting environmental, social and economic value.

50 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEP 2026

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

2026

Principal Partner

RECOGNISING EXCELLENCE ACROSS THE WASTE AND RESOURCE RECOVERY SECTOR The 2026 Waste Innovation and Recycling Awards will bring the industry together in Melbourne this October to recognise the bold ideas, breakthrough technologies and outstanding achievements shaping the future of Australia’s waste and resource recovery sector.

Get Tickets 29 OCTOBER 2026 EVOQE EVENTS MELBOURNE

Events //

Six new categories announced for WIRA FROM BREAKTHROUGH TECHNOLOGIES to transformative leadership and sustainability initiatives, the Waste Innovation and Recycling Awards (WIRA) has had six new categories added to the 2026 program. The awards will bring the industry together at Evoqe Events, Melbourne on 29 October to recognise the bold ideas, breakthrough technologies and outstanding achievements shaping the future of Australia’s waste and resource recovery sector. Building on the success of the 2025 program, this year’s Waste Awards feature 10 returning categories alongside six exciting new categories designed to reflect the evolving priorities and innovations within the industry.

Returning Award Categories

• Operational Excellence Award • Outstanding Facility of the Year Award • Outstanding WARR Project Metro Award

• Leader of the Year Award • Young Professional of the Year Award • Community Engagement Award • Woman of Waste Award • WIAR Workplace of the Year Award • Outstanding WARR Project Regional Award • Innovation Award New Award Categories

• Start-up Company Award • Marketer of the Year • Waste/Recycling Employee of the Year • Recycled Product of the Year • Safety Innovation Award • Lifetime Contribution Achievement Award “We are excited to bring back the Waste Awards in 2026 with an expanded awards program,” Caitlyn Douglas Prime Creative Media Head of Awards and

Conferences said. “We encourage businesses of all sizes, community organisations and industry professionals to nominate. “Whether you are leading a groundbreaking project, introducing new technologies, driving operational improvements or making a significant personal contribution to the sector, the Waste Awards are an opportunity to gain national recognition and inspire others across the industry.” Being recognised at the WIRA Awards is more than winning a trophy, it’s an opportunity to showcase leadership, innovation and impact across Australia’s waste, recycling and resource recovery sector. A nomination highlights the achievements of organisations, projects and individuals driving positive environmental and commercial outcomes, while providing valuable national exposure among industry peers, government stakeholders and potential partners.

The new awards include Start-up Company and Waste/Recycling Employee of the Year. Image: Prime Creative Media

52 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEP 2026

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

// Equipment News

Raising the bar for horizontal grinding FOR MORE THAN A DECADE, THE PETERSON 2710D has proven itself in the demanding forestry, land clearing and green waste recycling applications. With more than 30 units working across the country, it has become the most popular Peterson grinder in the Australian market. Now, Astec Industries has unveiled its successor, the Peterson 3710E horizontal grinder signalling the next evolution in high-performance mobile grinding. Introduced earlier this year at CONEXPO-CON/AGG, the 3710E builds on everything that made the 2710D successful while introducing gains in productivity and serviceability. Komatsu Forest has long been a supplier of Peterson horizontal grinders, providing solutions tailored to the country’s forestry and recycling industries. Since the Peterson brand was founded in 1981, it has built a global reputation for engineering robust grinding equipment, becoming part of Astec Industries in 2007. These grinders span outputs from 339kW to 894kW in both diesel and electric configurations, and have consistently delivered high production with low operating costs. Designed for contractors requiring exceptional mobility, high production rates and frequent relocation between job sites, the Australian specification 2710D featured a powerful 570kW Caterpillar Tier II C18 engine and a generous 153cm x 81cm feed opening. Combined with Peterson’s High Lift Feed Roll, the machine handled an impressive variety of material while maintaining excellent throughput.

Evolution rather than revolution The 3710E unit has been engineered to retain the grinding technology operators value while enhancing performance and ease of operation. Powered by a 755-horsepower Caterpillar C18 engine, the 3710E delivers high processing capacity and a larger screening area than its predecessor, all within a compact footprint designed for easy transport. One of the machine’s advantages is its mobility. Unlike many high-capacity grinders, the 3710E can be transported between job sites without requiring special permits, making it particularly attractive for Australian contractors servicing multiple locations.

At the heart of the 3710E remains Peterson’s three-stage upturn grinding system, a feature that has been instrumental in the success of the 2710D. Rather than simply smashing material apart, the upturn rotor design promotes shearing and cleavage fractures, producing lighter mulch with fewer fines while requiring less energy. The result is a more consistent, higher quality end product and improved fuel efficiency. Equally important is Peterson’s protection system. The patented Impact Release System uses air bags to absorb shock loads created by contaminated feedstock while maintaining uniform grinding pressure. This unique technology protects critical components from damage and reduces costly downtime. Backing this system is the Impact Cushion System, incorporating urethane cushions and shear pins that provide a second layer of defence against severe impacts from tramp metal or other contaminants. Together, these technologies continue to be key reasons why Peterson grinders deliver long-term reliability in Australia’s demanding operating conditions.

Easier maintenance means more uptime While productivity has increased, a major improvement in the 3710E is serviceability. Astec engineers have redesigned the grinder with operator convenience as a priority, incorporating: • A larger grate access door for improved internal access. • Peterson’s streamlined one-tool grate change system. • A dedicated maintenance platform for safer servicing. • Faster tooling replacement to minimise maintenance time. These practical improvements reduce downtime while making routine servicing safer and considerably more efficient.

Lower operating costs Like the 2710D before it, the 3710E has been designed with total cost of ownership in mind. Greater screening capacity, improved throughput, faster maintenance and Peterson’s proven grinding system combine to deliver: • Higher production rates. • Lower fuel consumption per tonne. • Reduced maintenance downtime. • Increased mulch yields. • More consistent finished product quality. • Improved overall profitability. For contractors working in Australia’s forestry and recycling sectors, these gains translate directly into stronger financial returns.

The next chapter

Peterson grinders are designed for contractors requiring high production rates and frequent relocation between job sites.

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

With the arrival of the Peterson 3710E, Astec has not reinvented a winning formula, it has refined it. By combining proven Peterson grinding technology with increased processing power and enhanced serviceability, the 3710E represents a logical next step for operators looking to maximise productivity while keeping operating costs under control. For Australian contractors familiar with the capabilities of the 2710D, the 3710E offers a compelling proposition: everything that made the previous model successful, now taken to an even higher level. AUG/SEP 2026 INSIDEWASTE 53

Equipment News //

The LANOTEC General Purpose lubricant helps lower maintenance costs of equipment. Image: LANOTEC

LANOTEC delivers performance for waste equipment RELIABLE LUBRICATION PLAYS AN IMPORTANT ROLE in keeping waste and recycling equipment operating efficiently. In demanding environments where machinery is exposed to moisture, contaminants and constant use, selecting the right lubricant can not only improve equipment performance, but make it last longer while reducing maintenance requirements. A project undertaken with Mil-Tek Waste Solutions in Springvale, Victoria, demonstrated how LANOTEC General Purpose lubricant has delivered long-lasting protection and improved reliability for cardboard compactor equipment. Mil-Tek manufactures and services cardboard compactor machines for customers across Australia and internationally. During both the manufacturing process and routine servicing, the company uses the LANOTEC General Purpose product to lubricate the pneumatic rams in its compactors. The lubricant was selected for its ability to provide long-lasting lubrication while protecting equipment from corrosion. Waste equipment often operates in harsh environments where moisture and contaminants can accelerate corrosion and component wear. Protecting these assets is essential to extending equipment life and minimising maintenance costs. 54 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEP 2026

The project identified several key benefits following the use of the lubricant. Existing rust on steel components was stabilised, preventing further progression and helping preserve the integrity of the equipment. Moisture and contaminants were effectively displaced from steel surfaces, reducing the conditions that contribute to corrosion. In addition, the lubricant formed a flexible protective film that remained intact during operation, providing ongoing protection for exposed metal surfaces.

operating environments. These advantages translate into measurable operational benefits for waste equipment operators. Longer-lasting lubrication supports extended equipment life, improved reliability and lower maintenance costs, helping businesses maximise uptime and reduce servicing requirements. Mil-Tek equipment is used by recognised brands, including Toyota Material Handling, demonstrating the importance of reliable maintenance solutions across a range of industrial applications.

“Existing rust on steel components was stabilised, preventing further progression and helping preserve the integrity of the equipment.” The project also highlighted why LANOTEC General Purpose lubricant was chosen over conventional lubricants. Compared with traditional products, it delivers a longer service life, reducing the frequency of reapplication. It also helps reduce wear and ongoing maintenance requirements while performing reliably in demanding

For organisations operating cardboard compactors and other waste processing equipment, effective lubrication is a simple but essential part of preventative maintenance. By protecting against corrosion, reducing wear and maintaining a durable protective barrier, this product provides a practical solution for extending the service life of critical equipment. Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

// Young Professional

Finding purpose through waste and resource recovery FOR JONATHAN TREVOR, SUSTAINABILITY OFFICER at Cleanaway Queensland, a career in waste and resource recovery was not part of a lifelong plan. Instead, it emerged from a growing interest in the environment, a desire to make a meaningful difference, and a belief that practical solutions can improve communities both in Australia and overseas. Trevor’s pathway into the industry began with a childhood experience that shaped his perspective on the environment, and the role people play in protecting it. “As a kid, I didn’t really fully know what I wanted to do,” he said. “My parents took me around Australia in 2014 for six months, so that’s kind of gave me a love for the environment. From that, I studied exercise science, because I also enjoyed sport. I didn’t particularly enjoy the studies, so moved to environmental management at university, and did an honours degree at the University of Queensland. From there, Trevor looked at anything in the environmental field where he might be able to make a difference in terms of interacting with communities. Something he wanted to do in the future was potentially work overseas with countries that are more disadvantaged than us. He felt that some countries didn’t deal with their waste streams as well as Australia did, so that encouraged him to choose waste as something where he could can make a tangible impact. After graduating from university, Trevor joined Cleanaway in a role focused on community education and engagement designed to improve resource recovery outcomes and reduce the amount of material sent to landfill. Now two years into his career, he has gained experience working directly with residents, schools and community groups across Southeast Queensland.

Working with the community One of the aspects Trevor enjoys most about the role is the variety it offers. No two days are the same, with responsibilities ranging from bin inspections and school presentations to multilingual education sessions and attendance at community events. “I like being out in the community at events on the weekend sharing my passion for helping the environment and making what might seem a complicated system for some, feel less confusing and achievable in a meaningful way,” he said. “I was recently at the Eco Action Festival, or LEAF and really enjoyed having conversations with a range of different people and providing handy sustainable tips in an engaging and interactive way.” The community-facing nature of the role also brings challenges. Trevor said some residents remain disengaged despite efforts to provide support and information but on the other hand, it’s rewarding when you see some of these residents come around and begin to make a more positive contribution to sustainable waste management.” Although he enjoys being active and working outdoors, Trevor said the most rewarding part of his role is engaging with students. Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

“I find it rewarding going into schools and presenting there,” he said. “You can see the enthusiasm students have for the environment and they are eager to play their part in helping make a sustainable future possible” Trevor believes education at an early age plays a huge role in building long-term recycling and resource recovery habits. He said children are not only more engaged, they listen more intently. He said, because children are more impressionable at a young age, it’s important to talk to them about recycling early so it becomes second nature.

Looking ahead Trevor values the experience he has gained through community engagement and looks forward to new opportunities that might come his way as he continues to grow his career in the environmental and waste management sector. “I would love to eventually transition into the space of landfill management – potentially landfill monitoring, or getting involved with some of the emerging waste management technologies popping up in Australia,” he said. “It would be great to then go over to countries that could benefit from and utilise that technology, helping roll out projects that contribute to improving their sustainability.” Looking at the broader industry, Trevor believes Australia is making progress, but there is still room for improvement. In particular, he sees policy consistency as a key issue affecting future investment and development. He sees the lack of uniform standards across councils, as well as federal and state governments as an issue. He realises that there are a lot of different waste streams, to deal with, but if there was a correct policy setting from the federal level it would be good for the industry and help reduce resident’s confusion to what goes in

what bin as this often varies LGA to LGA, and state to state. Trevor also believes responsibility for better outcomes extends beyond governments and industry. He believes we all need to play a part, from residents to businesses, to brand, manufacturers and local, state and federal governments. Collective action is key. When asked what changes he would prioritise if given the opportunity, Trevor points to greater producer responsibility and national consistency around recycling systems. “I think what the EU is doing with the responsibility on the producers and the end-of-life consumers is a good start,” he said. “For example, making the producers of soft plastics responsible for the end-of-life use of those plastics would be one thing. “With a reliable end market for recycled commodities, it would provide the government and industry with the confidence to invest more heavily in infrastructure and other resources that help progress our transition to a circular economy. “From an education standpoint, reducing confusion on what items can and can’t go in kerbside bins through the standardisation of what items are accepted in recycling and FOGO bins nationally would be ideal but until then, making waste education accessible to everyone and a standard practice across all learning environments.” Reflecting on his experience at Cleanaway, Trevor said the company has provided valuable support as he began his career in the industry. “My experience with Cleanaway has been really positive,” he said. “They’ve been supportive of me and gave me a chance when I was someone fresh out of uni. I had excellent mentors that helped equip me with the knowledge I have today and I feel like I have been able to make a positive impact on our local community.” Trevor (left) said the one of the rewarding aspects of his role is engaging with students. Image: Jonathan Trevor

AUG/SEP 2026 INSIDEWASTE 55

Waste Expo 2026 //

Waste expo showcases circular economy collaboration MAJOR PROJECTS AND PRACTICAL INNOVATION will take centre stage at Waste Expo Australia 2026, with exhibitors using the event to demonstrate how collaboration is helping reshape Australia’s waste and resource recovery sector. Among them are software specialist AMCS and packaging and recycling company Visy, each highlighting different parts of the waste value chain while sharing a common focus on improving long-term outcomes. For AMCS, the expo provides an opportunity to demonstrate how software, real-time data and artificial intelligence can help waste and resource recovery operators improve efficiency. For Visy, it is a chance to explain how recyclable packaging, processing capability and strong end markets all contribute to a functioning circular economy. Together, their participation reflects the broad mix of industry, government and councils expected to gather at Waste Expo Australia 2026. For Andrew Heading, senior field marketing manager at AMCS, the event provides an opportunity to reconnect with existing customers while introducing prospective clients to the breadth of the company’s software offering. For Suzanne Hall, communications and marketing manager from Visy Recycling, the expo is seen as a place to explain how materials move through the recycling system. “We’ll be there to showcase how materials going into kerbside recycling bins can be transformed into new packaging products,” she said. “Recovering products is a key part of the process, as is transforming them into new products supported by flourishing end markets.”

Improving operations through data Heading said AMCS has supported waste and recycling operators, as well as local government organisations, for many years by helping them manage data more effectively and operate more efficiently. “We’ve been around the industry for some time,” he said. “Waste Expo is a great event for connecting with existing customers, meeting new potential ones and showcasing how AMCS can support the industry.” At Waste Expo Australia, AMCS will use live demonstrations as the centrepiece of its exhibition, showcasing how its software solutions can provide greater visibility across waste operations and help organisations make better decisions. The company will highlight how its software portfolio has expanded through acquisitions, bringing together operational and facility management capabilities under the AMCS brand. Among the technologies visitors can expect to see are demonstrations of the AMCS Mandalay solution and the company’s weighbridge and facility management platform. Heading said the demonstrations will be designed to show practical applications rather than simply display software. One of the key technologies on display will be Vision AI, which has been introduced into a range of council 56 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEP 2026

Exhibitors now invest in customer engagement for months leading into the show. Image: RX Global

facilities. The artificial intelligence capability can identify contamination in waste streams and detect overfilled containers using real-time data. He said these demonstrations are intended to show customers and prospects how data can be used to improve day-to-day operations and provide greater visibility across facilities. AMCS is planning to showcase real-time analytics collected from facilities using its technology, allowing visitors to see how operational data can be presented and used to support better decision making. Rather than focusing on having a large stand, Heading said they wants to create an engaging space that demonstrates practical value. “We’ll have enough content and screens that hopefully will give people an idea about how we can add value to the business,” he said.

Delivering better resource recovery outcomes While AMCS’s work is focuses on planning and delivery, Visy’s emphasis at Waste Expo Australia will be on demonstrating how product design can improve recycling outcomes. One of the products on display will be Paper Bubble, the company’s paper-based alternative to conventional bubble wrap. Designed to provide the same protective function while being recyclable through existing paper recycling systems, the product reflects Visy’s broader strategy of replacing materials that are more difficult to recover with ones that fit established recycling streams. Hall said while councils often carry responsibility for managing waste, manufacturers like Visy can help reduce contamination by designing new innovative products designed to be recovered through existing recycling infrastructure. “We believe things should be designed to be recycled,” said Hall. “Australia’s glass circular economy shows what is possible. Through container deposit schemes and kerbside collections, to investment in processing and Australian manufacturing, Visy has lifted the recycled content in our glass products

from 58 to 64 per cent. Working to get more circular packaging on supermarket shelves helps manufacturers, councils, residents, recyclers and the environment. “This is Visy’s first time back at the Waste Expo for five or six years. There’s so much focus on recycling, end markets, product design and more – from policy makers to local residents checking the recyclability of their packaging as they walk down the supermarket aisle. We’re looking forward to sharing ideas and meeting people dedicated to building a circular economy.”

Building better long-term outcomes Although they operate in different parts of the industry, both companies see collaboration as essential to improving Australia’s waste and resource recovery system. Heading believes software can help waste operators become more efficient while improving the services they provide to communities through better collections, streamlined administration and more effective operations. Waste Expo Australia also remains an important part of the company’s broader marketing strategy. While digital marketing channels continue to expand, Heading believes face-to-face engagement remains essential in a B2B environment. “People buy from people, and people have to engage with others,” he said. “I expect industry events to continue evolving, with organisers creating more opportunities for exhibitors to engage with visitors before, during and after the exhibition.” Rather than treating an expo as a three-day event, Heading said successful exhibitors now invest in customer engagement for months leading into the show and continue those conversations well afterwards. For AMCS, Waste Expo Australia provides the opportunity to demonstrate technology in action, meet customers face to face and show how data-driven software can help waste organisations operate more efficiently. Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

// Product Profiles

ROTOCHOPPER FP-66 HORIZONTAL GRINDER

FOCUS ENVIRO

Unit Dimensions: Length: 42’ 1” – 50’ 11”, Height: 13’ 6” – 14’, Width: 10’ – 10’ 5” Applications: Shingles, C&D, Compost, Pallet, Mulch, Waste, Tree Care, Land Clearing, Biomass, Agricultural Grinding Solutions; Weight: 25,855 - 39,463 kg Information: The Rotochopper FP-66 horizontal grinder is engineered to bridge the gap between mid-volume operations and high-capacity performance. The FP-66 brings the features of larger grinders into a streamlined, fuel-efficient package. At the heart of the FP-66 is Rotochopper’s “Perfect in One Pass” philosophy. This is achieved through a 66-inch-wide rotor featuring a specialised tooth arrangement and tip speed, paired with optimised screen geometry. Together, they maximise production capacity while maintaining strict control over the end product size. The unit features a steel slat infeed conveyor that reduces spillage and wear compared to traditional belts, alongside a patented adjustable slab ramp infeed plate. This allows operators to hydraulically adjust the feed angle to suit varied materials. Maintenance is through a screen cradle system that allows for rapid changes and a digital operator interface for real-time monitoring. For operations looking to scale their output without the overhead of a larger machine, the FP-66 delivers industrial-grade results at a significantly lower operating cost. Name: FOCUS ENVIR; Phone: 02 4365 4247, Web: www.focusenviro.com.au Email: info@focusenviro.com.au

EDGE INNOVATE VS420

FOCUS ENVIRO

Unit Dimensions: Width: 2.5m (8’4”) Length: 13.4m (44’) Height: 4.7m (15’6”) Applications: GO, MSW, C&D waste, biomass, tyres Weight: 31.5 tonne Information: The Edge VS420 is a high capacity, high torque twin shaft shredder that is ideal for the processing of a large array of materials including; green waste, MSW, C&D waste, biomass and end of life tyres. This shredder has been developed for versatility and resistance to contaminants with a number of customisable shredding programmes and chamber configurations available. An intelligent operating system which incorporates tramp metal protection provides the ultimate protection from contaminants and prevents asset damage. It has twin synchronised, high torque shredder shafts which can be customised to suit a customer’s exact application and desired product piece size. EDGE’s twin shaft design provides exceptional material intake, ensures less wear, promotes self-cleaning and prevents material wrapping even in the toughest applications. With a range of both rapid volume reduction and intricate piece sizing chambers available, The EDGE VS420 series can be customised to be deployed as either a primary or secondary shredder. Name: FOCUS ENVIRO; Phone: 02 4365 4247 Web: www.focusenviro.com.au; Email: info@focusenviro.com.au

UNTHA XR3000 MOBILE-E

FOCUS ENVIRO

Unit Dimensions: Width: 3.0m (9’ 10’’) Length: 15.5m (50’ 10’’) Height: 3.3m (10’ 10’’) Applications: Municipal solid waste (MSW), commercial & industrial (C&I) waste, construction & demolition (C&D) waste, timber, plastics, textiles, RDF/SRF production, bulky waste reduction, and pre-shredding for recycling and energy recovery streams; Weight: 37 tonne Information: The UNTHA XR3000 is a high-torque, single-shaft industrial shredder designed for demanding waste processing applications across the recycling and energy recovery sectors. Engineered for high throughput and consistent output sizing, it is capable of processing up to approximately 70 tonnes per hour depending on material type and configuration. The machine features UNTHA’s Eco Power Drive system, delivering energy-efficient operation while maintaining strong resistance to contamination. Its versatile design allows operators to achieve a defined particle size for downstream processing or fuel production. The XR3000 is widely used for RDF/SRF production, C&D waste processing and bulky waste reduction applications. Name: FOCUS ENVIRO; Phone: 02 4365 4247 Web: www.focusenviro.com.au Email: info@focusenviro.com.au

Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

AUG/SEP 2026 INSIDEWASTE 57

Wasted Space //

The great waste levy mystery GETTING PEOPLE IN THE WASTE AND RECYCLING industry to agree on anything is notoriously difficult. Mention energy-from-waste and half the room reaches for a microphone. Mention kerbside glass and someone starts drawing flowcharts on a napkin. But there is one topic capable of producing complete unity across the sector in under three seconds: waste levies. Not the concept itself. Most people agree with that. Charge landfill operators a levy, make disposal more expensive than recovery, and use the money to build a better recycling industry. It is, on paper, an elegant little circle worthy of the circular economy itself. The confusion begins somewhere around the part where the money disappears. Every tonne of waste attracts a levy. The sums involved quickly become eye-watering. Millions become hundreds of millions, which occasionally become figures large enough to make accountants whistle softly before asking for another spreadsheet. The expectation has always been wonderfully straightforward. Industry pays the levy. Governments collect the levy. Governments reinvest the levy into the infrastructure, education and innovation needed to reduce landfill. Everybody wins. Instead, the money embarks upon a remarkable journey. It enters government coffers with every appearance of heading towards recycling, before 58 INSIDEWASTE AUG/SEP 2026

taking an unexpected detour into what economists politely call consolidated revenue and everyone else calls “somewhere else”. From that point onwards, tracking it becomes rather like watching a plastic bag on a windy day. You know it exists. You just have absolutely no idea where it’s going. Occasionally, a government announces a new recycling fund worth $20 million, complete with glossy photos of hard hats, excavators and ministers enthusiastically pointing at things. This is warmly welcomed, right up until someone remembers the levy collected that year was closer to $400 million. It is rather like borrowing your neighbour’s ute, returning it with a full tank, and expecting applause because you also bought them a scented pine-tree air freshener. Nobody disputes that governments have many competing priorities. Hospitals are important. Schools are important. Roads are important. But waste levies were sold with the subtle implication that they might, from time to time, have something to do with waste. Imagine paying a toll on every bridge with the understanding that the money would maintain bridges, only to discover it had instead funded a helicopter ride for a politician to a political party fundraiser when a train trip would have sufficed. The needs of a politician doesn’t stop your bridge developing potholes.

Image: mapo–Japan/shutterstock.com

Meanwhile, the recycling industry continues doing what it has always done: making do. Facilities need upgrading. New technology needs funding. Markets need developing. Education campaigns need running. Fire prevention needs improving. Manufacturers need incentives to use recycled content. Everyone agrees these things are essential, usually while standing beside equipment old enough to remember when fax machines were considered cutting-edge. The irony is almost artistic. The very industry generating the revenue intended to improve itself often finds itself applying for grants funded by a tiny fraction of the money it contributed in the first place. Success rates resemble winning a meat tray at the local bowls club, except the application form is considerably longer. Of course, governments will rightly point to investments they have made, and many have funded worthwhile projects. The issue isn’t whether money comes back. It’s whether enough of it remembers where it came from. Perhaps that’s the real lesson. In Australia, nothing is ever truly wasted. Even waste levies are successfully recycled. They simply get recycled into almost everything except waste and recycling. Circular economy, indeed. Just not quite the circle anyone had in mind. Daily news updates at www.insidewaste.com.au

Turning waste into value – from Dubai to Down Under

From initial planning to long-term operation, Kanadevia Inova delivers complete thermal and biological Waste to Energy plants. As an experienced EPC contractor, we handle every step – develop, design, build, operate, maintain. Our track record of more than 1,600 plants worldwide speaks for itself – including one of the world’s largest WtE facilities in Dubai. Check our references.

Discover more

SKALA ENV - 235X297 plus bleed ISW back page - ScreenPod 26.pdf

CMY

7/7/26

2:43 pm