2015 CAFR by City of Temple

Comprehensive Annual Financial Report

City of Temple, Texas For the year ended September 30, 2015 Prepared by: Finance Department Traci L. Barnard, CPA Director of Finance Melissa Przybylski, CPA Assistant Director of Finance Stacey Reisner, CPA Treasury/Grants Manager Jennifer Emerson Budget Coordinator

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Year Ended September 30, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTORY SECTION: Letter of Transmittal Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Organizational Structure City of Temple Principal Officials

9 27 29 30

FINANCIAL SECTION: Independent Auditors’ Report

Management’s Discussion and Analysis

Basic Financial Statements Government-Wide Financial Statements: Statement of Net Position Statement of Activities Fund Financial Statements: Balance Sheet – Governmental Funds Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Net Position Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances – Governmental Funds Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance – Budget and Actual – General Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance – Budget and Actual – Pass-Through Financing Project Fund Statement of Net Position – Proprietary Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position – Proprietary Funds Statement of Cash Flows – Proprietary Funds Statement of Fiduciary Net Position – Fiduciary Funds Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position – Fiduciary Funds

54 55 56 57 58 59 61 63 64 67 68 71 72 73

Notes to the Financial Statements

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Year Ended September 30, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS, Continued Page FINANCIAL SECTION, Continued: Required Supplementary Information Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios: Texas Municipal Retirement System Temple Firefighter’s Relief and Retirement Fund

135 137

Schedule of Funding Progress Schedule of Employer Contributions

139 139

Combining and Individual Fund Financial Statements and Schedules Nonmajor Governmental Funds: Combining Balance Sheet – Nonmajor Governmental Funds Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances – Nonmajor Governmental Funds Discretely Presented Component Unit Financial StatementsReinvestment Zone No. 1: Comparative Balance Sheet Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance – Budget and Actual Schedules of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance – Budget and Actual: Debt Service Fund Hotel/Motel Fund Federal/State Grant Fund Drainage Fund Supplementary Individual Fund Financial Schedules – General Fund: Comparative Balance Sheet Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance – Budget and Actual Schedule of Revenues – Budget and Actual Schedule of Expenditures – Budget and Actual Detailed Schedule of Expenditures – Budget and Actual Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities – Agency Fund

142 143

146 147

150 151 152 153 156 158 159 161 162 166

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Year Ended September 30, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS, Continued Table

Page

Combining and Individual Fund Financial Statements and Schedules, Continued: Supplementary Schedules: Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards Notes to Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards

168 170

STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED): Financial Trends Net Position by Component Changes in Net Position Fund Balances of Governmental Funds Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds

I II III IV

172 173 175 176

Revenue Capacity General Governmental Tax & Franchise Revenues by Source Assessed Value and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property Property Tax Rates Direct and Overlapping Governments Principal Property Taxpayers Property Tax Levies and Collections Taxable Sales by Category

V VI VII VIII IX X

178 179 180 181 182 183

Debt Capacity Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type Ratios of Net General Bonded Debt Outstanding Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt Computation of Legal Debt Margin Pledged-Revenue Coverage

XI XII XIII XIV XV

184 185 186 187 188

Demographic and Economic Information Demographic and Economic Statistics Principal Employers

XVI XVII

189 190

Operating Information Full-time Equivalent City Government â€“ Employees by Function/Program Operating Indicators by Function/Program Capital Asset Statistics by Function/Program

XVIII XIX XX

191 197 199

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Year Ended September 30, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS, Continued Table

Page

STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED), Continued: Other Information Retirement – Analysis of Funding Progress and Contribution Rates – Texas Municipal Retirement System XXI Temple Firefighters’ Relief and Retirement Fund XXII Active and Retiree Health Care Costs XXIII Water and Wastewater – Average Daily Treated Water vs. Average Daily Treatment Capacity XXIV Annual Treated Water vs. Total Available Water XXV Schedule of Water Pumped to Town vs. Water Billed XXVI Schedule of Water Customers – Residential and Commercial XXVII Average Daily Treated Wastewater vs. Average Daily Treatment Capacity XXVIII Schedule of Sewer Customers – Residential and Commercial XXIX Top 10 Water and Wastewater Customers XXX Other – Insurance Coverage XXXI Fast Facts/Miscellaneous Statistical Data XXXII

201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 213

Sources: Unless otherwise noted, the information in these schedules is derived from the comprehensive annual financial reports for the relevant year. COMPLIANCE SECTION: Independent Auditors’ Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards

223

Independent Auditors’ Report on Compliance for Each Major Program and on Internal Control over Compliance Required by OMB Circular A-133

225

Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs

227

Introductory Section

February 4, 2016

Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Temple Temple, Texas Dear Council Members: The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) of the City of Temple, Texas (the City) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, is submitted herewith. Responsibility for both the accuracy of the data and the completeness and fairness of the presentation, including all disclosures, rests with the City. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the enclosed data is accurate in all material respects and is reported in a manner designed to present fairly the financial position and results of operations of the City, on a Government-wide and Fund basis. All disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain an understanding of the City’s financial activities have been included. Management assumes full responsibility for the completeness and reliability of the information contained in this report, based upon a comprehensive framework of internal control that it has established for this purpose. Because the cost of internal control should not exceed anticipated benefits, the objective is to provide reasonable, rather than absolute, assurance that the financial statements are free of any material misstatements. Brockway, Gersbach, Franklin & Niemeier, P.C., Certified Public Accountants, have issued an unmodified (“clean”) opinion on the City of Temple financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2015. The independent auditors’ report is located at the front of the financial section of this report. Management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A) immediately follows the independent auditors’ report and provides a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis of the basic financial statements. MD&A compliments this letter of transmittal and should be read in conjunction with it. GENERAL INFORMATION – CITY OF TEMPLE Temple is located near the geographic and population center of the State of Texas, 67 miles north of Austin, 130 miles north of San Antonio, 160 miles northwest of Houston, and 120 miles south of the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex. There are approximately 69 square miles in the City’s corporate boundary.

The City was founded on June 20, 1881, when the original town lots were sold by the Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railway. It was subsequently chartered on March 27, 1907, and operates under a Council-Manager form of government. The City Council is comprised of a Mayor and four members and is responsible for enacting ordinances, resolutions, and regulations governing the City, as well as appointing members of various statutory and advisory boards, the City Manager, City Attorney, Director of Finance, City Secretary, and a Municipal Judge. The City Manager is the chief administrative officer of the government and is responsible for the enforcement of laws and ordinances, the appointment and supervision of the executive directors and heads of departments, and the performance of functions within the municipal organization. The financial reporting entity (the government) includes all the funds of the primary government (i.e., the City of Temple as legally defined), as well as all of its component units. Component units are legally separate entities for which the primary government is financially accountable. The government provides a full range of services including police and fire protection; economic development; sanitation services; community development; building inspection; parks and recreation; the construction and operation of water, sewer, drainage, solid waste services, streets and infrastructure; convention and tourism activities and a civic center, library and airport facilities. Discretely presented component units are legally separate entities and not part of the primary government’s operations. Accordingly, the Temple Economic Development Corporation and the Tax Increment Financing District (Reinvestment Zone No. 1) are reported in separate columns in the government-wide financial statements to emphasize that they are legally separate from the primary government and to differentiate their financial position and results of operations from those of the primary government. The Temple Housing Authority, a related organization, is not a part of this report, as the City’s accountability does not extend beyond appointing some members of the Board. The Temple Heath and Bioscience Economic Development District is shown as an agency fund in this report. The District is a legally separate entity from the City. ECONOMIC CONDITIONS AND OUTLOOK Temple’s location, which is close to the geographic center of the State of Texas, provides a strategic location in the State and has been important for economic development. Temple continues to be a regional center for manufacturers, distribution centers and medical facilities in the Central Texas area. Temple’s location is enhanced being located at the intersection of Interstate Highway 35 (NAFTA link with Mexico and the U.S.), State Highways 36, 190, 53, 93, and 95. Additionally, major rail services intersect within Temple’s city limits. During the past year, the City has experienced a steady increase in economic development. Significant new construction permits of $ 60,160,488 for FY 2015 underscore the continued steady expansion of our residential base. Sales tax receipts of $ 21,311,743 show an increase of 10.93% over fiscal year 2014. Local unemployment is currently 3.77%, representing one of the lowest rates in the State of Texas.

After experiencing the first decline in taxable assessed property value in twenty consecutive years in FY 2011, the City experienced a 3.55% increase in FY 2015 to the current value of $ 3,699,245,668. The census figures for 2010 of 66,102 residents show an average growth of over 2% per year over the past ten years. Given Temple’s continued pro-business attitude and enthusiastic accommodation of industry, the City continues to prosper economically. Highlights include: 

Panda Temple Power, L.L.C. continued to construct the company’s 758-megawatt natural gas-fueled, combined-cycle power plant in southeast Temple. On November 5, 2009, Council authorized a 30-year development agreement with Panda Temple Power, L.L.C. that commits the City to sell effluent water from the City’s Doshier Farm Wastewater Treatment Plant to provide water for the operation of the electric generation facility. The proposed plant uses gas turbines to generate electricity and uses water (effluent) to generate steam and cool the system. Preliminary data suggests that they will need somewhere between 4-5 million gallons of water per day for peak operations. The City commitment is on average no more than 4 million gallons of effluent or potable water per day. Their actual usage will vary from day to day depending on weather and demand for electricity. Panda Temple Power, L.L.C. closed on 250 acres in January 2011. Phase I of the construction of the facility was completed in July of 2014. Phase II was completed in the summer of 2015.



May 5, 2011, Council authorized an economic development agreement with Panda Temple Power, L.L.C. As part of the project, Panda proposes to build: 1) an extension of Lorraine Drive (approximately 2,050 feet) to serve their facility; 2) associated storm water improvements associated with Lorraine Drive; 3) an eight inch wastewater line; and 4) a twelve inch water line to serve their facility. The City’s share of over sizing/bettering the wastewater and water improvements is the not to exceed amount of $ 564,580, and payment of the City’s share is due one year after Panda’s power plant becomes operational which occurred in July 2015. Panda estimates that their investment will be approximately $ 500 million with about $ 130 million of that amount tax exempt in the form of required emissions control equipment. FY 2015 taxable value was $ 320,034,006. In addition, the Council authorized a tax abatement agreement which gives the company 10 years of 50% tax abatement on the increased taxable value of real property improvements. The tax abatement for Phase I will be in effect in FY 2016 and the tax abatement for Phase II will be in effect in FY 2017.



In April 2013, Council authorized an economic development agreement between the City, Temple Economic Development Corporation and Buc-ee’s, LTD. In FY 2015, Buc-ee’s, LTD constructed a 60,000 square foot travel center located at the southeast corner of North Loop 363 and IH-35. Property improvements are estimated to be at least $ 16,000,000 and will employ at least 150 full or part-time employees. The City’s obligations include providing an incentive in an amount not to exceed 75% of the sales tax earned by Buc-ee’s during the calendar year, construct public utility improvements to provide water and sewer service to the Travel Center, and to enter into a tax abatement agreement to provide 50% tax abatement for the next ten years. The Temple Economic Development Corporation

(TEDC) will provide a one-time grant of $ 500,000 to be tendered to Buc-ee’s upon receipt of a temporary or permanent Certificate of Occupancy. Buc-ee’s opened for operations in April 2015. 

In July 2015, StarCorr Sheets, LLC began construction on a new $ 22,000,000 manufacturing facility. The 150,000 square foot building, which features manufacturing space, offices and a rail-line connection is expected to open in October 2015.



The Shoppes on the Hill is a $ 20,000,000 mixed-use development that will include retail, restaurants, and multi-family living. Morris Venture Partners broke ground on Phase I of the Shoppes on the Hill during FY 2015. Phase I consists of 13,500 square feet of retail space with two pad sites and Phase II includes an upscale multi-family complex. Panera Bread, Noodles & Company, and Aspen Dental are all expected to open in the spring of 2016.



Bush’s Chicken United plans to construct an 8,000 square-foot, new corporate office for the restaurant franchise in West Temple. The company’s project of $ 1,000,000 capital investment will produce twenty new full-time jobs with growth projected to fifty employees. Construction is expected to begin in the fall of 2015 with plans to move into the building mid-2016. The City entered into a tax abatement agreement in October 2015 to provide a 45% tax abatement for five years.



Mars Petcare US, Inc. has announced a $ 20 million equipment and facility upgrade project. The current 109,000 square foot facility was opened in 2006. The upgrade project includes modification to the inside of the facility, including increasing the storage capacity for raw materials and updating the equipment to help sustain the manufacturing and distribution of safe, high-quality pet food. The project is anticipated to take approximately 2 years and should be completed in the winter of 2016.



Buzzi Unicem USA plans to add its 34th cement distribution location in the U.S. on a 9-acre tract of land in the Temple Industrial Park, located near the intersection of IH-35 and Loop 363 in Northwest Temple. The new terminal will cost in excess of $ 7,000,000 and use at least 1,000 rail cars per year, which will bring additional revenue back to the City through a revenue sharing agreement with Central Texas Railway. In addition, this project will add a rail spur (a short secondary rail line that will branch off from the main rail line in Temple). Construction on the project began in the fall of 2015 and is expected to be completed early 2016.

The City of Temple is recognized by the medical community in the United States as a leading medical provider with two major hospitals located within Temple. Baylor Scott & White Health (BS&W) and the Olin E. Teague Veterans Hospital, combined, employ approximately 10,000 full time positions. The hospitals provide medical care to the surrounding local, state, and international community. Texas A&M University College of Medicine in conjunction with BS&W and Veterans Hospital provide the four years of medical school as well as research and development.

Baylor Scott & White Health includes 43 hospitals, more than 500 patient care sites, more than 6,000 active physicians, 34,000 employees and the Scott & White Health Plan. It is guided by a combined team of leaders from both Baylor and Scott & White. It is the largest not-for-profit health system in Texas and one of the largest in the United States. Baylor Scott & White Health plans to construct a new distribution facility in Temple. This new center will be utilized to distribute medical and other supplies to several hospitals and clinics in the Temple area. The $ 20,000,000 investment in the approximate 100,000 square foot facility will result in the creation and/or retention of forty jobs. In addition, the Temple Health and Bioscience District was created as a result of legislation passed by the State of Texas in 2003 and approved by Temple voters, to establish the district in that same year. The first such district created in Texas, Temple’s Health and Bioscience District is devoted to the development and creation of health and bioscience/biotechnology opportunities within the City of Temple. Serving the Temple area are fifteen major schools and universities, detailed in the statistical section of this document, which offer one of the highest levels of educational opportunities available in the nation. The City of Temple also operates the Frank Mayborn Civic and Convention Center which can accommodate both small activities and major conventions. There are sixty-one public parks and special use areas, ranging from small neighborhood parks to major sport activity facilities; such as, Lions Park which hosts major intra-mural softball events for teams throughout the State of Texas. The City has four swimming pools/water parks. The Hardin Swim Center, owned and operated by the Temple Independent School District, is a heated indoor junior Olympic size pool that hosts statewide high school and intra-mural competitions. The City has several neighborhood and recreational centers which provide day-time activities for the youth of Temple. There are three golf facilities; the Temple College Golf Course (9 holes), the City owned Sammons Park (18 holes), and the private Wildflower Country Club (18 holes). Many new jobs continue to be created with the opening, expansion and relocation of the businesses to the City. LONG-TERM FINANCIAL PLANNING The City of Temple is currently managing the largest capital improvement program in the history of the community. As of September 30, 2015, a total of $ 235,164,728 has been allocated for various capital projects including such improvements as water and sewer infrastructure, transportation infrastructure, parks improvements and public safety infrastructure. Funding sources for these projects can be identified in eight major areas: Utility Revenue Bonds General Obligation Bonds Certificates of Obligation General Operating Budget Funding

Limited Tax Notes TxDOT Pass-Through Financing Agreement & Other TxDOT Agreements Grants Reinvestment Zone No. 1 During FY 2015, several major capital projects are underway or have been completed such as the Drill Tower for Fire Training, Friar’s Creek Trail – Phase II, Westfield Boulevard Road Improvements – Phase I, Temple-Belton WWTP Reclaimed Effluent Waterline, Waterline Replacement along Lamar from 7th Street to Nugent Tank, and TMED – 1st Street at Temple College. During FY 2013, the City of Temple began construction on the single largest capital improvement project ever undertaken by the community which is the expansion of the Northwest Loop 363. This is a significant project for the City and one that has been a desire of the community for many decades. The project includes upgrading approximately four miles of the existing two lane Northwest Loop from just west of the BNSF railroad crossing to FM 2305. This will create a continuous four lane highway from the Northwest Loop at I-35 to the Southwest Loop at I-35. The project includes grade separated interchanges at both State Highway 36/Airport Road and Wendland Road. Current project cost estimates are $ 51,719,886, with approximately $ 36,500,000 funded through TxDOT (Category 12 and Pass-Through Financing funds) and approximately $ 17,000,000 funded through the City of Temple. The project is substantially complete. The FY 2015 Budget includes $ 7,686,001 for routine capital for the general operating budget which includes equipment and public infrastructure projects that are underway and/or planned for this fiscal year. In accordance with current fiscal and financial policies, $ 1,528,929 of the routine capital is funded with fund balance. The breakdown of this amount is as follows: $ 1,488,179 – General Fund $ 40,750 – Hotel/Motel Fund FINANCIAL INFORMATION Accounting Procedures and Budgetary Controls The City’s accounting records for general governmental activities are maintained on a modified accrual basis, with revenues being recorded when available and measurable, and expenditures being recorded when the services or goods are received and the liabilities are incurred. Accounting records for the City’s water and sewer utility fund are maintained on the accrual basis. Budgetary control is maintained at the department level, and encumbrances are entered at the time a purchase order is issued. Open encumbrances are recorded as reservations of fund balance as of September 30 of each year, and the subsequent year’s budget is increased to

reflect these carried-forward encumbrances. Unspent and unencumbered appropriations lapse at the end of the fiscal year. The budgetary process begins each year with the preparation of both current and proposed year revenue estimates by the City’s financial management staff, and expenditure estimates by each City department. Budgets are reviewed by the Director of Finance. The City Manager makes final decisions and submits a recommended budget to the City Council. The proposed budget is reviewed extensively by the City Council, a process which includes a Charter-mandated public hearing, in addition to work sessions, which are open to the public. The City Charter requires adoption of the City budget by no later than September 15. While the budget is developed and controlled at the departmental level, appropriations are made at the account level. An ordinance establishes the budget for operating expenditures, debt service payments and interfund transfers while a separate ordinance establishes the property tax rate. During the course of the fiscal year, expenditure controls are maintained by each department head with overall review exercised by the Director of Finance and the City Manager. Monthly departmental expenditure reports are generated by an automated management accounting system and provide expenditure totals and encumbrances at the line-item level for the most recently completed month, as well as a year-to-date total, and an actual versus planned rate of expenditure. Constant review of revenue and expenditure trends is maintained with specific responsibility assigned to the Director of Finance. Recommendations for corrective action are made to the City Manager (and to the City Council, if appropriate) as needed to ensure compliance with the adopted budget. The City’s Finance Department publishes a Quarterly Financial Report directed at providing internal and external users with the general awareness of the City’s financial positions and economic activity. The report includes a Financial Summary section reporting the performances of the major operating funds and a status report of the City’s capital projects; a section summarizing key economic indicators and an in-depth review with graphic illustrations; and a section describing investment activity, interest earnings and the City’s investment portfolio. The highlights of each quarter’s report are presented to the City Council. GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL FUNCTIONS Tax Rates All eligible property within the City is subject to assessment, levy, and collection by the City of a continuing, direct ad valorem tax sufficient to provide for the payment of principal and interest on outstanding bonds within the limits prescribed by law, and the payment of operation and maintenance costs as approved by the City Council. Under State law and provisions of the City Charter, the City is limited to a maximum tax rate of $ 1.20 per $ 100 assessed valuation. As

shown below, the tax rate adopted by the City Council has historically been substantially lower than the maximum allowed by law. The allocation of the property tax rate by purpose (General Fund operations and Debt Service) for FY 2014-15 and the preceding four fiscal years is reflected in the following table:

Purpose 2015 General Fund $ 0.3300 Debt Service 0.2564 Total Tax Rate $ 0.5864

2014 $ 0.3324 0.2540 $ 0.5864

Fiscal Year 2013 2012 $ 0.3300 $ 0.3240 0.2564 0.2439 $ 0.5864 $ 0.5679

2011 $ 0.3300 0.2379 $ 0.5679

Tax Appraisal/Collection Responsibilities Under Texas law enacted in 1979, and subsequent revisions to the State Property Tax Code, the appraised value of taxable property in Temple is established by the Tax Appraisal District of Bell County. The City of Temple and other taxing jurisdictions in Bell County pay a pro rata share of the budgeted expenditures incurred by the Appraisal District, based upon individual levy. In fiscal year 2014-15, the City’s payment to the Appraisal District for tax collection and appraisal services was $ 265,652, an increase of $ 30,529 from the amount paid by the City in FY 2013-14. Debt Administration Two ratios traditionally used to analyze the debt structure of municipalities are presented below. Revenue debt has been excluded since service and user charges made by utility system customers are used to retire such debt and no ad valorem tax proceeds are used for utility revenue bond debt service.

Outstanding General Bonded Debt at 9-30-15 (Net of Debt Service) Estimated Population Net Bonded Debt per Capita Net Bonded Debt per Assessed Value

$ 179,886,122 73,408 $ 2,450 4.86%

The City’s latest bond issues received the rating of “AA” from Standard & Poor’s. Cash Management According to the City of Temple’s Investment Policy, the Investment Officer has three main objectives in managing the portfolio, in order of priority: safety, liquidity and yield.

Safety Safety is insured in several ways: investing only in securities allowed by state statute and the City’s investment policy; using delivery versus payment for all security transactions; requiring all cash in the bank be collateralized with government securities pledged to the City and safekept at a third party institution; and diversifying investment purchases to minimize individual security market risk. In addition, the City uses an approved list of security brokers when making investment transactions. The City’s bank deposits are secured with the following collateral: $ 3,853,815 in government securities at market value held at the Bank of New York Mellon $ 30,000,000 letter of credit from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta $ 25,100,000 in letters of credit from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas $ 15,477,085 in government securities at market value held at the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas $ 10,357,743 in government securities at market value held at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston $ 290,355 in government securities at market value held at TIB Bank Liquidity Liquidity is the second objective of the Investment Officer’s management of the portfolio. To ensure sufficient funds to meet scheduled obligations, investment maturities are matched to projected expenditures. In addition, a portion of the portfolio is invested in liquid assets, such as pools and short-term securities, to cover unforeseen expenditures and day-to-day fluctuations. By using the matching strategy, a portion of the portfolio can be extended out longer, thus increasing yield and stabilizing interest earnings. At September 30, 2015, the weighted average maturity of the City’s investment portfolio was 109.40 days. Yield Maximizing yield is the third objective of the Investment Officer. Although maintaining safety and liquidity are always more important than increasing yield, the Investment Officer should be able to maintain a reasonable rate of return and at the same time avoid taking on unnecessary risks. The City of Temple uses the 91-day T-bill rate as a yield benchmark. The City’s portfolio average yield was 0.23% in 2015, which was above the T-bill yield of 0.02%. As of September 30, 2015, the City’s cash and investment resources were divided between cash on hand of $ 15,470, deposits of $ 55,483,595, and investments of $ 87,307,538.

MAJOR INITIATIVES Budget Development & Background Budget Process—Developing a budget is now a year round process and the framework for the development of this budget began in late 2014 with the City Manager working on timelines and issue identification. Through late 2014 and early 2015, the City Manager works with Finance to develop the budget calendar and process for the FY 2016 Budget. In January, the City Manager held a planning retreat with department and division heads to identify and discuss issues for the upcoming budget. In February, the City Manager and Finance staff met with Departments to conduct a status review of current year budget and performance indicators and provide initial direction regarding issues identified in the planning retreat. Also in February, the City Council held a budget retreat to discuss various strategic issues and to review and, as might be needed, update the City’s Strategic Plan. The Strategic Plan establishes the mission and vision of the City, identifies four (4) major areas of focus, and establishes the specific goals and objectives. The areas of focus identified in the Plan are: (1) Expand the Tax Base, (2) Grow Health and Bioscience, (3) Improve Our Infrastructure, and (4) Serve our Community. These focus areas and their associated goals and objectives guided the development of the FY 2016 Budget. During the retreat, Council also received information regarding potential budget issues identified by staff. From February through the delivery of the FY 2016 Budget, staff has worked on preparing, reviewing, researching and responding to questions from Finance and the Manager relating to the programs and services this Preliminary Budget recommends. Budget Approach—The FY 2016 Budget continues the “activity-based” perspective that began in FY 2010. Each Department was asked to identify each and every activity that they provide. They were also asked to identify the cost for providing each activity. This “activity-based” approach allows for better identification of the services and service levels that we provide. Budget “the Rules of Engagement”—This year’s budget has been developed within the framework of the strategic plan priorities adopted by the City Council and the budget parameters (“the Rules of Engagement”) that were briefed to the Council at the February 12, 2015 budget retreat and May 21, 2015 budget work session. Those Rules are: 1. 2. 3. 4.

Maintain current services and service levels; Preserve, protect, and develop our workforce; Grow our tax base & economy; and Preserve and enhance our facilities and infrastructure.

All within a framework of fiscal restraint and responsibility.

Financial Highlights The FY 2016 Budget appropriates a total of $ 140,508,327 for the upcoming fiscal year. Of this amount, $ 118,457,058 is allocated for the operations and maintenance budget which includes debt service and transfers. In addition, $ 22,051,269 is allocated for routine capital for the general operating budget which includes equipment and public infrastructure projects. The Reinvestment Zone infrastructure improvements in the amount of $ 15,381,353 is also included in the allocation. In accordance with current fiscal and financial policies, $ 2,874,450 of the routine capital is funded with fund balance or retained earnings. The breakdown of this amount is as follows: $ 2,095,552 – General Fund $ 509,500 – Drainage Fund $ 269,398 – Reinvestment Zone No. 1 As in previous years, the FY 2016 Budget is a balanced budget under the policies and parameters discussed in earlier planning sessions with the City Council. In addition, $ 40,280,000 is included for Capital Improvements Programs (CIP). The CIP allocated in FY 2015 can be divided into three categories: Multi-year Non-Routine Capital Recommended for Utility Revenue Bond Funding (U.R. CIP) - $ 17,360,000 Multi-year Non-Routine Capital Recommended for Certificate of Obligation Bond Funding (C.O. CIP) - $ 21,000,000 Multi-year Non-Routine Capital Recommended for Limited Tax Notes (L.T.N. CIP) - $ 1,920,000 City Manager’s Highlights With the above in mind, I will highlight a few areas of general priority and significance in the FY 2016 Budget. Public Safety—The FY 2016 Budget includes several initiatives designed to enhance public safety services. The Budget recommends funding three firefighter over hire positions, establishing an in-house regional fire training academy, the addition of two outdoor warning sirens, and the replacement of Quint 6, Engine 7, and the Fire Command Vehicle. Additionally, the Budget includes funding an additional Police Evidence and Property Technician position, the replacement of public safety laptops, the replacement of 11 marked and 2 unmarked police vehicles, the replacement of 1 pickup truck for training, the addition of 3 marked police vehicles, the purchase of several police body cameras, and the replacement of ballistic vests.

Parks and Recreation—In May of 2015, voters approved a $ 27,675,000 Parks bond package that includes 24 projects ranging from neighborhood park improvements, new community parks, new and upgraded athletic facilities, facility upgrades, water recreation projects, and linkage trails. The five cent annual tax rate impact included as part of the bond package is reflected in my proposed budget. The FY 2016 Budget also includes operating and maintenance expenses associated with bond improvements anticipated to come online during FY 2016 including Jaycee, Carver, Western Hills, Oak Creek, Optimist, and Jefferson neighborhood parks improvements, Wilson football field, Scott & White baseball complex, and Lion’s Junction deep water pool. The FY 2016 Budget also includes the addition of a pavilion at Little Bluestem Park, the replacement of a dugout at Bakers Field, the first phase of exterior improvements at the Mayborn Center, and a funding for the development of a master plan for a future botanic garden at Bend of the River. The Department’s two fee-supported facilities, Summit Recreation Center and the Sammons Golf Course, are presented in the FY 2016 Preliminary Budget at a recovery rate of 82% and 83%, respectively. Community Development—The FY 2016 Budget leverages our Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to establish a Community Development program tasked with assisting with the implementation of the East Temple Redevelopment Plan. The Budget includes establishing a Community Development Manager position to spearhead the program. Programs proposed for funding include a housing improvement program, infrastructure improvements, a demolition program, and a neighborhood clean-up program, including pro-active code enforcement. Downtown Redevelopment—The FY 2016 Budget sees the first full year funding of the Transformation Team in partnership with the City’s Reinvestment Zone. The Transformation Team is a City crew dedicated to revitalization efforts in targeted areas of the City, with an initial focus on our downtown. The Team will have a very visible, distinctive appearance. They will perform clean-up and improvement projects in targeted areas of the community, called "transformation zones." The Team will work with property owners to improve the appearance and safety of the targeted areas. The Team Coordinator serves as a liaison with other City departments and partner agencies for projects within the targeted areas. Additionally, the FY 2016 Budget includes the addition of a Downtown Development Coordinator position to assist with retail development, infrastructure improvements and event coordination in Downtown Temple. This is part of an ongoing effort with the Chamber of Commerce to revitalize the Downtown physically, but also from a livability standpoint. Solid Waste—The FY 2016 Budget also includes the addition of a residential solid waste route which includes an additional Automated Route Operator position and an additional solid waste

truck. We currently have 10 residential solid waste routes serving approximately 23,300 customers. The last residential route was added in 2010 by shifting resources from a roll-off route. Since that time, there has been a 22% increase in customers and our residential routes now average 2,330 customers per route, well exceeding industry standards. The addition of a solid waste route will assist in reducing the average customers per route back to a manageable level. The good news is that we are a growing city, and that impact is reflected in the need to add equipment and a route to our residential collection. Additionally, the FY 2016 Budget includes the replacement of four solid waste trucks. An approximate 5% adjustment to commercial solid waste rates is also proposed. The last adjustment to commercial solid waste rates occurred in FY 2009. Transportation Infrastructure—The FY 2016 Budget includes the fourth year of a multi-year transportation capital improvement program. The Transportation CIP (TCIP) is a ten-year, $ 126,700,000 effort to expand and maintain our major transportation infrastructure. The TCIP is a result of our recent assessments and reports on both the condition of our transportation infrastructure and the need to improve our mobility. The project areas identified in the TCIP are intended to address both the need to improve our existing transportation infrastructure and provide new capacity and connectivity. The TCIP is a dynamic program that has, and will continue to, evolve and change in response to community needs. A key element in the TCIP is a recognition that, in addition to building new roads to increase capacity and connectivity, we also need to take care of the streets and roads that we have built. What we refer to as the “Legacy Pavement Preservation Program.” Taking care of existing infrastructure is the most cost effective way to manage and maintain the system, as more infrastructure deteriorates, the more costly it is to restore serviceability. The Legacy Pavement Preservation Program enhances pavement performance, extends pavement life, decreases lifetime roadway costs, reduces user delays, and provides improved safety and mobility. The implementation and financing plan recommended for the TCIP is a phased approach which groups projects in three-year packages with design and right-of-way acquisition funded first and, in most cases, construction funded in the following package. Each three-year package also includes $ 9,000,000 for the Legacy Pavement Preservation Program – an average of $ 3,000,000 each year. This phased approach allows us to allocate construction funds only when projects are ready, minimize and stabilize the tax rate impact, maximize opportunity for tax base growth and allows us to balance debt amortization. The phased approach recommended results in no impact to the tax rate this year. It is anticipated, based on several assumptions, that the tax rate impact for this program of work will be three cents in FY 2017. The phasing of projects and associated financing enables evaluation of the program from year to year and allows us to pause or adjust the program as needed.

Additionally, the FY 2016 Budget includes an additional Streets Foreman position to help oversee supervising the street maintenance and reconstruction crew. The Budget also includes funding for the first year of a three year plan to implement detection technology at 100% of the City’s signalized intersections. Detection allows the signal to operate more efficiently, which improves coordination and timing. Utility Infrastructure—The City has invested almost $ 107,716,000 over the past nine years in improving and extending our water and sewer infrastructure. The FY 2016 Budget includes an additional $ 17,360,000 to continue this work. Our utility infrastructure is extremely important to our ability to deliver services in one of our core mission areas. I believe our strategic plan, our strategic focus areas, and our community expectations relative to the services we provide, should reflect this. Other Highlights—In addition to the programs and positions detailed above, the FY 2016 Budget also includes the addition of a Public Records Administrator position in the City Secretary’s Office to assist in managing the City’s public information program, an Administrative Assistant I position at the Airport to provide support for necessary administrative functions, a Troubleshooter in the Facility Services division to reduce contracted preventative maintenance and repair costs for heating, ventilation, and air conditioning and other major facility systems, a part-time Museum Development Assistant at the Railroad and Heritage Museum to assist in the coordination and growth of the Museum’s membership program, a Human Resources Generalist position to administer the City’s safety and training program, and an Environmental Compliance Technician position to administer the City’s fats, oils, and grease reduction program. The FY 2016 Budget also provides $ 765,000 for a partial year implementation of Civil Service pay plan adjustments based on the 2015 Civil Service market study. The FY 2016 Budget also includes continued funding for a group health insurance plan, employee retirement plan, and employee longevity program. The Budget also recommends funding for an enhanced performance pay program for general government employees and an enhanced employee engagement program. One of the strategic focus areas identified in our Strategic Plan is to expand the tax base. In order for us to continue to meet the demands for current service, and in order for us to meet the needs of projected growth and development, it is critical that this objective be met. As Council will recall, the FY 2008 Budget included a funding commitment to a matrix incentive pool at $ 800,000. This matrix incentive pool was intended to provide funding for economic development incentives relating to economic Financial Highlights by Fund General Fund Revenues—Total revenues for the FY 2016 General Fund Budget are presented at $ 65,934,694, an increase of 5.08% compared to the FY 2015 Adopted Budget. The three largest sources or revenue for the General Fund are sales tax, property tax and solid waste charges.

Property Tax—In the FY 2016 Budget, property tax accounts for 19.58% of the General Fund budgeted revenues and is the second largest revenue source of the General Fund. The tax rate for FY 2016 is at 62.98¢ per $ 100 valuation, which includes the 4.34¢ tax rate adjustment for the 2015 Parks Bond program approved by voters in May 2015. This rate is based on a certified appraised value of $ 3,840,746,157 (net taxable value not adjusted for frozen values). The tax rate is comprised of two components, the Maintenance and Operations rate (M&O) and the Interest Sinking rate (I&S). This year’s proposed tax rate is 32.34¢ for the M&O rate and 30.64¢ for the I&S rate. Sales Tax—While much attention is focused on the property tax rate number, our single largest source of revenue for the General Fund continues to be sales tax revenue. In the FY 2016 Budget, sales tax is projected to account for 30.84% of the General Fund budgeted revenues. The FY 2016 Budget estimates $ 20,335,000 in sales tax revenue, a 6.47% increase in sales tax revenue over budgeted FY 2015 sales tax revenue. Solid Waste Rates—Charges associated with solid waste services represent the third largest source of revenue for the General Fund and are projected to account for 14.35% of total General Fund revenues. $ 9,461,996 in solid waste revenue is projected for FY 2016, representing a 5.21% increase from the FY 2015 solid waste revenue adopted budget of $ 8,993,691. The FY 2016 Budget includes an approximate 5% adjustment to commercial solid waste rates. The last adjustment to commercial solid waste rates occurred in FY 2009. The rate adjustment supports the continuation of investment in capital replacement. General Fund Expenditures—Total expenditures for the FY 2016 General Fund Budget are presented at $ 68,730,216, an increase of 4.98% compared to the FY 2015 Adopted Budget. As noted above, significant programs in the FY 2016 Budget that have contributed to this increase include the following:    

Additional solid waste route; Firefighter over hire positions; Civil service compensation study implementation; and Parks and Recreation operation/maintenance cost for Park Bond projects coming online in FY 2016.

Water and Wastewater Fund—Total revenues for the FY 2016 Water and Wastewater Fund Budget are presented at $ 33,466,378, an increase of 1.42% compared to the FY 2015 Adopted Budget. Expenses, capital improvements, and debt service for the FY 2016 Water and Wastewater Fund Budget are presented at $ 33,466,378, an increase of 1.42% compared with prior year. The capital improvements include the allocation of $ 17,360,000 to continue the long-term replacement program of water and sewer infrastructures and equipment needs. A 6.39% rate

increase was approved in the FY 2013 Budget to support these operational and capital programs. Hotel/Motel Tax Fund—Total revenues for the Hotel/Motel Fund Budget are presented at $ 1,936,720, an increase of 5.23% compared to the FY 2015 Adopted Budget. 25% of the Hotel/Motel revenues are from the operations of the Frank Mayborn Center. Expenditures for the Hotel/Motel Fund Budget are presented at $ 2,356,118, an increase of 28.02% compared to the FY 2015 Adopted Budget. Funding for the Frank Mayborn Center, Tourism/Marketing, and Railroad & Heritage Museum are funded through the Hotel/Motel Tax Fund. Agencies seeking community enhancement grants whose services are eligible for funding by Hotel/Motel tax revenues are also funded through the Hotel/Motel Tax Fund. As noted above, significant programs in the FY 2016 Budget that have contributed to this increase include the following:  

Phase 1 of exterior improvements at the Frank Mayborn Center; and Development of a Master plan for the Bend of the River property.

Federal and State Grant Fund—Total revenues and expenditures for Federal and State Grant Fund Budget are presented at $ 357,357, a decrease of 8.43% compared to the FY 2015 Adopted Budget. Total revenues include the award of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) at $ 357,357. The proposed allocation of CDBG funds are as follows:     

Public service agencies - $ 50,000; Demolition - $ 70,000; Housing improvements - $ 90,886; Infrastructure improvements- $ 75,000; and General administration - $ 71,471

Drainage Fund—Total revenues are presented at $ 1,138,650, a 1.86% increase from prior year. Expenditures are presented at $ 1,648,150, an increase of 30.31% compared to the FY 2015 Adopted Budget. The expenditures of the drainage fund represent personnel and operational cost related to maintenance of existing drainage systems. In addition, there is $ 606,000 in significant capital equipment of which $ 509,500 will be funded with Fund Balance. OTHER INFORMATION Independent Audit According to the City Charter of the City of Temple, an annual independent audit is required to be made of the financial records of the City by a Certified Public Accountant selected by the City Council. The City of Temple engaged the firm of Brockway, Gersbach, Franklin & Niemeier, P.C. and the opinion has been included in this report. It should be noted that the auditors included all funds in their audit, performed their audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and

stated that, in their opinion, the statements herein present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the City at September 30, 2015, and the results of its operations and the cash flows of its proprietary fund types for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Certificate of Achievement The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City of Temple for its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year ended September 30, 2014. The Certificate of Achievement is a prestigious national award recognizing conformance with the highest standards for preparation of state and local government financial reports. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a governmental unit must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized Comprehensive Annual Financial Report whose contents conform to program standards. Such reports must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. The City of Temple has received a Certificate of Achievement for the last thirty-four consecutive years (Fiscal Years ended 1981-2014). We believe our current report continues to conform to the Certificate of Achievement Program requirements, and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate. Distinguished Budget Presentation Award For the fiscal year 2014-15 Budget document, the City received, for the twentieth consecutive year, the distinguished Budget Presentation Award from the Governmental Finance Officers Association (GFOA). Acknowledgments The preparation of this report on a timely basis could not have been accomplished without the dedicated services of a highly qualified staff in the Finance Department. We would like to express our appreciation to all the staff of the Finance Department who assisted and contributed to the preparation of this report. In particular, we would like to thank Assistant Director of Finance, Melissa Przybylski, CPA, Treasury/Grants Manager, Stacey Reisner, CPA, and Budget Coordinator, Jennifer Emerson for their exemplary efforts in assuming primary responsibility for producing this document. Other departments and offices of the City have also contributed directly or indirectly to the preparation of this report. We acknowledge the efforts of the departments in following good financial management practices and in providing information and assistance during the preparation of this report. We acknowledge the thorough, professional, and timely manner in which the audit was conducted by our independent auditors, Brockway, Gersbach, Franklin & Niemeier, P.C.

Organizational Structure

Division

Department

Council Appointed Position

Legend:

Fire Department

Office of the City Secretary

Office of the City Attorney

Police Department

City Secretary

City Attorney

Information Technology Department

Office of the City Manager

Human Resources Library

Solid Waste Streets

Planning

General Services

Fleet Services

Utility Services

Code Enforcement

Engineering

Permits & Inspections

Animal Services

Drainage

Traffic Signal

Assistant City Manager

Airport

City Judge

Public Works Department

City Manager

Mayor and City Council

Visitors Center

Recreation

Railroad Museum

Parks

Mayborn Center

Golf Course

Parks & Recreation Department

Utility Business Office

Purchasing

Municipal Court

Metering

Finance/Accounting

Director of Finance

CITY OF TEMPLE PRINCIPAL OFFICIALS MAYOR

DANIEL A. DUNN MAYOR PRO-TEMPORE

COUNCILMEMBER

RUSSELL T. SCHNEIDER

JUDY MORALES

COUNCILMEMBER

TIMOTHY DAVIS

PERRY T. CLOUD

JONATHAN GRAHAM, CITY MANAGER TRACI L. BARNARD, C.P.A., DIRECTOR OF FINANCE KAYLA LANDEROS, CITY ATTORNEY LACY BORGESON, CITY SECRETARY

Financial Section

-··II

--BROCKWAY

- · · - GERSBACH -

FRANKLIN & NIEMEIER,P.C.

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Independent Auditors' Report

The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Temple, Texas Report on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the businesstype activities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of City of Temple, Texas (the City), as of and for the year ended September 30, 2015, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditors' Responsibility Our responsibility is to express op1mons on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.

POST OFFICE BOX

4083 •

TEMPlE, TEXAS

76505-4083 • 25.4.773.9907 • FAX 254.773.1570

33 WWW TEMPLECPA.COM 33

Independent Auditors' Report (Continued)

Opinions

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Temple, Texas, as of September 30, 2015, and the respective changes in financial position, and, where applicable, cash flows thereof and respective budgetary comparison for the general fund, the pass-through financing project fund for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note I, F. to the financial statements, in 2015 the City adopted new accounting guidance, GASB Statement No. 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter. Other Matters Required Supplementary Information

Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management's discussion and analysis on pages 37 through 51, the schedule of changes in net pension liability and related ratios for the Texas Municipal Retirement System and the Temple Firefighters' Relief and Retirement Fund and the schedule of funding progress for other postemployment benefits on pages 135 through 139 be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. Other Information

Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming op1mons on the financial statements that collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements. The introductory section, combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements, and statistical section are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. The schedule of expenditures of federal and state awards on pages 168 and 169 is presented for purposes of additional analysis as required by U.S. Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations, and is also not a required part of the basic financial statements.

Independent Auditors' Report (Continued)

The combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements and the schedule of expenditures of federal awards are the responsibility of management and were derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements, and schedules and the schedule of expenditures of federal awards are fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole. The introductory and statistical sections have not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on them. Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 28, 2016, on our consideration of the City's internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City's internal control over financial reporting and compliance. Brockway, Gersbach, Franklin & Niemeier, P.C.

~.~~,fr~ f(. Temple, Texas January 28, 2016

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS September 30, 2015 Our discussion and analysis of the City of Temple’s financial performance provides an overview and analysis of the City’s financial activities for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015. Please read it in conjunction with the accompanying transmittal letter and the accompanying basic financial statements. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 

The City’s net position of the primary government was $ 139,086,514 at September 30, 2015. Of this amount, $ 26,326,257 is unrestricted and may be used to meet the City’s future obligations. Of the $ 26.3 million net unrestricted net position, ($ 4,866,709) is related to governmental activities, which includes the General Fund. The negative amount of the unrestricted net position for governmental activities is the result of the implementation of GASB 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions. The $ 31,192,966 net balance of unrestricted net position is related to business-type activities, which is the City’s enterprise fund (water and sewer).



The City of Temple’s total net position decreased by $ 23,607,465 during the current fiscal year. Net position of governmental activities decreased $ 26,481,887 from $ 63,671,167. Net position of business-type activities increased $ 2,974,422 from $ 99,022,812. The net decrease in governmental activities is attributable to the implementation of GASB 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions. The increase in the business-type activities is attributable to an increase in the City’s investment in capital assets.



As of September 30, 2015, the City of Temple’s governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $ 76,529,986, an increase of $ 34,468,506 in comparison with the prior fiscal year. The capital projects fund had a net increase of $ 37,200,812 due to the issuance of bonds as approved by the voters in May 2015 and the expenditure of bond proceeds from the first phase of the Transportation Capital Improvement Program. In addition, the net increase was also attributable to a decrease in the debt service fund of $ 389,871 due to the use of fund balance for debt service. The Pass-Through Financing Project fund had a decrease in fund balance of $ 3,930,817 related to the expenditure of the bond proceeds. There were increases in fund balances in the general fund of $ 1,222,032 and nonmajor governmental funds of $ 366,350.



At the end of the current fiscal year, assigned/unassigned fund balance for the general fund was $ 25,740,895 or approximately 40.19% of total general fund expenditures.



The City’s total net bonded debt increased by $ 43,483,677 during the current fiscal year. This net increase was due to the issuance of 2015 General Obligation bonds in the amount of $ 25,130,000 issued for parks projects approved by the voters and the issuance of the 2014 Certificate of Obligation bonds issued for the Transportation Capital Improvement Program.

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 OVERVIEW OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Management’s discussion and analysis is intended to serve as an introduction to the City of Temple’s basic financial statements. The City of Temple’s basic financial statements comprise three components: 1) government-wide financial statements, 2) fund financial statements, and 3) notes to the financial statements. This report also contains other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements themselves. Government-Wide Financial Statements - The government-wide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the City of Temple’s finances, in a manner similar to private-sector business. The statement of net position presents information on all of the City of Temple’s assets and liabilities, with the difference between the two reported as net position. Over time, increases or decreases in net position may serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position of the City of Temple is improving or deteriorating. The statement of net position combines and consolidates governmental funds current financial resources (short-term spendable resources) with capital assets and long-term obligations. Other nonfinancial factors should also be taken into consideration, such as changes in the City’s property tax base and the condition of the City’s infrastructure (i.e. roads, drainage improvements, storm and sewer lines, etc.), to assess the overall health or financial condition of the City. The statement of activities presents information showing how the City’s net position changed during the most recent fiscal year. All of the current year’s revenues and expenses are taken into account regardless of when cash is received or paid. Thus, revenues and expenses are reported in this statement for some items that will only result in cash flows in future fiscal periods (e.g. uncollected taxes and earned but not used vacation leave). Both the statement of net position and the statement of activities are prepared utilizing the accrual basis of accounting. In the Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities, the City is divided into three kinds of activities: 

 

Governmental activities – Most of the City’s basic services are reported here, including the police, fire, library, airport, streets, sanitation, culture and recreation, and general government. Property taxes, sales taxes and franchise fees finance most of these activities. Business-type activities – The City charges a fee to customers to help it cover all or most of the cost of certain services it provides. The City’s water and sewer system activity are reported here. Component units – The City includes two separate legal entities in its report – the Temple Economic Development Corporation and the Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (a tax incremental financing unit). Although legally separate, these “component units” are important because the City is financially accountable for them.

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 Reporting the City’s Most Significant Funds Fund Financial Statements - The fund financial statements provide detailed information about the most significant funds – not the City as a whole. Some funds are required to be established by the City’s charter and by bond covenants. However, the City Council establishes many other funds to help it control and manage money for particular purposes or to show that it is meeting legal responsibilities for using certain taxes, grants and other money. The City’s three kinds of funds – governmental, proprietary and fiduciary – utilize different accounting approaches. 

Governmental funds – The majority of the City’s basic services are reported in governmental funds, which focus on how money flows into and out of those funds and the balances left at year end that are available for spending. These funds are reported using an accounting method identified as the modified accrual basis of accounting, which measures cash and all other financial assets that can readily be converted to cash. The governmental fund statements provide a detailed short-term view of the City’s general government operations and the basic services it provides. Governmental fund information helps you determine whether there are more or fewer financial resources that can be spent in the near future to finance the City’s programs. By comparing information presented for governmental funds with similar information presented for governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements, readers may better understand the long-term impact of the government’s near-term financing decisions. The relationships or differences between governmental activities (reported in the Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities) and governmental funds are detailed in a reconciliation following the fund financial statements. The City of Temple maintains seven individual governmental funds. Information is presented separately in the governmental funds balance sheet and in the governmental funds statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances for the general fund, debt service fund, capital projects fund and the pass-through financing project fund, all of which are considered to be major funds. Data from the other three governmental funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation. Individual fund data for each of these non-major governmental funds is provided in the form of combining statements elsewhere in this report.



Proprietary funds – The City of Temple maintains two different types of proprietary funds. Enterprise funds are used to report the same functions presented as business-type activities in the government wide financial statements. The City uses an enterprise fund to account for its water and sewer utility. Internal service funds are an accounting device used to accumulate and allocate costs internally among the City’s various programs. The City uses an internal service fund to account for its self-funded health insurance program. Because this service predominantly benefits governmental rather than business-type functions, it has been included within the governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements.

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 Proprietary funds provide the same type of information as the government-wide financial statements, only in more detail. The proprietary fund financial statements provide separate information for the water and sewer utility. The water and sewer utility is considered a major fund of the City. The internal service fund is a single presentation in the proprietary fund financial statements. 

Fiduciary funds – fiduciary funds are used to account for resources held for the benefit of parties outside of the government. Fiduciary funds are not reflected in the governmentwide financial statement because the resources of those funds are not available to support the City’s own programs. The accounting for fiduciary funds is much like that used for proprietary funds. The City’s fiduciary fund consists of the City of Temple Employee Benefits Trust which accounts for the activities of the trust to provide City officers, employees, qualified retirees, and their dependents with life, disability, dental, accident and other health related benefits through the purchase of insurance. The City’s agency fund is used to account for assets held by the City, as an agent for the Health & Bioscience Economic Development District.

Notes to the financial statements The notes provide additional information that is essential to a full understanding of the data provided in the government-wide and fund financial statements. The notes to the financial statements can be found on pages 73 through 133 of this report.

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 Other Information In addition to the basic financial statements and accompanying notes, this report presents certain required supplementary information concerning the City’s progress in funding its obligation to provide pension benefits to the employees and the City’s contributions related to the Temple Firefighters’ Relief and Retirement Fund. Required supplementary information can be found on page 135 through 139 of this report. THE CITY AS A WHOLE – Government-Wide Financial Analysis The City’s combined net position (assets exceeding liabilities) was $ 139,086,514 as of September 30, 2015. The following tables focus on the net position (Table I) and general revenues and significant expenses of the City’s governmental and business-type activities (Table II). By far the largest portion of the City’s net position (79.42%) reflects its investment in capital assets (e.g., land, buildings, infrastructure, machinery and equipment); less any related debt used to acquire those assets that is still outstanding. The City uses these capital assets to provide services to citizens; consequently, these assets are not available for future spending. Although the City’s investment in its capital assets is reported net of related debt, it should be noted that the resources needed to repay this debt must be provided from other sources, since the capital assets themselves cannot be used to liquidate these liabilities.

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 Table I Summary of Statement of Net Position Total

Current and other assets Capital assets Total assets Deferred outflows of resources Long-term liabilities outstanding Other liabilities Total liabilities Deferred inflows of resources Net Position: Net investment in capital assets Restricted Unrestricted Total net position

Governmental

Business-type

Primary

Activities

Government

2015

2014

2015

2014

2015

2014

$ 87,920,882 143,510,633 231,431,515

$ 53,514,595 137,447,719 190,962,314

$ 61,502,215 141,839,476 203,341,691

$ 42,001,201 134,596,204 176,597,405

$ 149,423,097 285,350,109 434,773,206

$ 95,515,796 272,043,923 367,559,719

9,179,606

2,734,394

3,657,753

2,997,157

12,837,359

5,731,551

191,229,683 11,019,440

118,898,310 11,127,231

101,262,699 3,565,958

75,464,884 5,106,866

292,492,382 14,585,398

194,363,194 16,234,097

202,249,123

130,025,541

104,828,657

80,571,750

307,077,780

210,597,291

1,272,718

173,553

1,446,271

44,686,194 706,237 18,278,736 $ 63,671,167

69,469,800 1,334,468 31,192,966 $ 101,997,234

72,979,933 1,330,549 24,712,330 $ 99,022,812

110,466,092 2,294,165 26,326,257 $ 139,086,514

117,666,127 2,036,786 42,991,066 $ 162,693,979

40,996,292 959,697 (4,866,709) $ 37,089,280

An additional portion of the City of Temple’s net position (1.65%) represents resources that are subject to external restrictions on how they may be used. The balance of unrestricted net position, $ 26,326,257, may be used to meet the government’s ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors. The deficit in the unrestricted net position of the Governmental Funds at the end of the current fiscal year is due to the implementation of GASB 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions. Implementation of this standard decreased Unrestricted Net Position in the Governmental Funds by $ 24,666,765 as a prior period adjustment. The City of Temple is able to report a positive balance in the overall total net position for the government as a whole. There was an increase of $ 3,919 in restricted net position reported in connection with the City of Temple’s business-type activities. The increase is nominal for FY 2015.

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS MANAGEMENTâ€™S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 Governmental and business-type activities decreased the Cityâ€™s net position by $ 23,607,465. The key elements of this decrease are as follows: Table II Statement of Activities, Changes in Net Position Total Governmental

Business-type

Primary

Activities

Government

2015 Revenues: Program revenues: Charges for services Operating grants and contributions Capital grants and contributions General revenues: Property tax

2014

27,109,293

2015

26,558,329

2014

30,375,811

2015

29,824,871

57,485,104

2014

56,383,200

488,829

513,508

488,829

513,508

391,026

12,724,001

381,295

1,330,056

772,321

14,054,057

20,847,366

20,187,267

20,847,366

20,187,267

21,311,743

18,981,471

21,311,743

18,981,471

Franchise fees Mixed beverage taxes

6,780,354 156,030

6,382,781 155,280

6,780,354 156,030

6,382,781 155,280

Hotel/Motel taxes

Sales tax

1,440,351

1,445,935

1,440,351

1,445,935

Other taxes Investment earnings

72,392 156,778

71,750 108,848

353,239

515,564

72,392 510,017

71,750 624,412

Miscellaneous income

746,050

2,055,938

746,050

2,055,938

79,500,212

89,185,108

31,110,345

31,670,491

110,610,557

120,855,599

Total revenues Expenses: General government

14,904,124

14,634,734

14,904,124

14,634,734

Public safety Highway and streets

29,912,951 10,259,565

28,224,373 28,047,101

29,912,951 10,259,565

28,224,373 28,047,101

5,990,896

7,080,709

5,990,896

7,080,709

112,058

35,755

112,058

35,755

12,312,968

12,365,268

12,312,968

12,365,268

Airport

3,683,154

3,655,194

3,683,154

3,655,194

Interest on long-term debt

4,237,351

3,639,945

4,237,351

3,639,945

Water and sewer

26,081,271

26,882,060

26,081,271

26,882,060

Total expenses

26,081,271

26,882,060

107,494,338

124,565,139

Sanitation Health and welfare Culture & leisure services

81,413,067

97,683,079

Increase (decrease) in net position before transfers Transfers Increase (decrease) in net position

(1,912,855) (2,267) (1,915,122)

(8,497,971) 6,803 (8,491,168)

Net position - beginning, as restated Net position - ending $

39,004,402 37,089,280

72,162,335 63,671,167

5,029,074 2,267 5,031,341 96,965,893 $ 101,997,234

4,788,431 (6,803) 4,781,628

94,241,184 99,022,812

3,116,219 3,116,219 135,970,295 $ 139,086,514

(3,709,540) (3,709,540) 166,403,519 $ 162,693,979

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015

Total Sources of Revenue Mixed Franchise fees beverage taxes 6.1% 0.1% Sales tax 19.3% Property tax 18.8% Capital grants & contributions 0.7%

Hotel/Motel taxes 1.3%

Total Expenses by Activity Other taxes 0.1% Settlement income, net expense 0.0% Investment earnings 0.5%

Operating grants & contributions 0.4%

Charges for Services 52.0%

Culture & leisure services 11.5%

Interest on Airport long-term debt 3.9% 3.4%

Water and Sew er 24.3%

Health and w elfare 0.1%

Sanitation 5.6% Highw ay and streets 9.5%

Miscellaneous income 0.7%

General Government 13.9%

Public Safety 27.8%

For FY 2015, revenues from governmental activities totaled $ 79,500,212. Property taxes and sales tax are the largest components of revenues (53.03%). Charges for services account for 34.10% of total governmental revenue. For FY 2015, expenses for governmental activities totaled $ 81,413,067. The City’s five largest funded programs are for public safety, general government, highways and streets, sanitation, and culture and leisure services. For governmental activities, the Statement of Activities on page 55 shows that $ 27,109,293 was financed by those receiving services, $ 488,829 from operating grants and contributions, $ 391,026 from capital grants and contributions, with the City’s general revenues financing $ 51,508,797 of the remaining program expenses. The debt service fund has a total fund balance of $ 959,697, all of which is reserved for the payment of debt service. The decrease in fund balance during the current year in the debt service fund was attributable to the use of fund balance for debt service payments. The capital projects fund has a total fund balance of $ 43,821,158. The fund balance increased by $ 37,200,812 during the current fiscal year. This net increase is due to the issuance of bonds and expenditure of the prior years’ bond proceeds. The pass-through financing project fund has a total fund balance of $ 1,101,346. This major fund was new in FY 2012 and was derived from the issuance of pass-through agreement revenue & limited tax bonds. The majority of those bonds were spent during FY 2014. Remaining bond proceeds are expected to be spent during FY 2016.

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 Business-type Activities Revenues of the City’s business-type activities were $ 31,110,345 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015. Revenues decreased approximately $ 560,146 as compared to the prior fiscal year. Expenses for the City’s business-type activities were $ 26,081,271, a decrease of $ 800,789, or -3.07%, compared to the prior fiscal year. The decrease in revenues is the net result of the increase in sales of effluent water, decrease in consumption, and a decrease in the amount in contributed capital. Water consumption decreased .7% in FY 2015 compared to the prior fiscal year. Unrestricted net position of the water and sewer fund were $ 31,192,966. The water and sewer fund unrestricted net position increased in the current fiscal year by $ 6,480,636. CAPITAL ASSET AND DEBT ADMINISTRATION Capital Assets At the end of the FY 2015, the City had $ 285,350,109 invested in a broad range of capital assets, including police and fire equipment, buildings, park facilities, roads, bridges and water and sewer lines. Table III Capital Assets at Year-End (Net of Depreciation) Total

Land Construction in progress Buildings Infrastructure Furniture & equipment Machinery & equipment

Governmental

Business-type

Primary

Activities

Government

2015

2014

$ 17,909,330 14,077,352 45,109,664 50,188,854 6,274,639 9,950,794 $ 143,510,633

$ 16,716,960 17,582,699 44,377,704 42,697,558 5,052,666 11,020,132 $ 137,447,719

2015 $

1,940,240 15,334,058 20,617,896 100,336,030 328,218 3,283,034 $ 141,839,476

2014

2015

2014

1,717,328 17,866,477 21,629,453 89,349,513 388,658 3,644,775 $ 134,596,204

$ 19,849,570 29,411,410 65,727,560 150,524,884 6,602,857 13,233,828 $ 285,350,109

$ 18,434,288 35,449,176 66,007,157 132,047,071 5,441,324 14,664,907 $272,043,923

Major capital asset additions during the current fiscal year included the following:        

Midway Drive Sidewalks (Bonham) - $ 510,927 FM 2305 Sidewalks (Lakewood) - $ 603,770 1st St – Ave F to Ave M Sidewalks $ 643,040 Airport Runway Reconstruction - $ 7,899,168 Property Acquisition for West Temple Park - $ 406,692 Traffic Signals – Research Blvd - $ 250,741 Burn Tower Props - $ 355,242 Burn Tower & Drill Ground Storage Building (Station #8) - $ 2,571,390

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015         

Property Acquisition for Outer Loop, Phase III - $ 757,784 Westfield Blvd Improvements, Phase I - $ 1,966,601 Waterline Improvement Project (Entire City) - $ 306,359 Highland Park Subdivision Sewer Line Extension - $ 374,850 Bird Creek, Phase III - $ 265,723 Westfield Blvd., Phase I – Sewer line Extension - $ 344,722 Wastewater Line Replacement of 10th-12th Street to Central - $ 520,561 Water Treatment Plant - Doshier RAS Pump Replacement - $ 442,875 Temple-Belton Wastewater Treatment Plant Reclaim Waterline - $ 12,399,920

Additional information on the City of Temple’s capital assets can be found in Note III on pages 92 through 94 of this report. Debt At year-end, the City had $ 233,700,819 in bonds and notes payable outstanding as shown in Table IV. Table IV Outstanding Debt, at Year-End Governmental

Business-type

Activities

Totals

2015

2014

2015

2014

2015

2014

General obligation bonds Certificate of obligation Contractual obligations Revenue bonds Pass-through revenue & limited tax bonds Notes payable

$ 75,420,000 36,650,000 4,415,000 465,000

$ 49,525,000 20,830,000 5,065,000 910,000

$ 39,000,000 52,855,000

$ 36,480,000 35,120,000

$ 114,420,000 36,650,000 4,415,000 53,320,000

$ 86,005,000 20,830,000 5,065,000 36,030,000

24,700,000 195,819

24,700,000 242,013

24,700,000 195,819

24,700,000 242,013

Totals

$ 141,845,819

$ 101,272,013

$ 91,855,000

$ 71,600,000

$ 233,700,819

$ 172,872,013

The City of Temple maintains an “AA” rating from Standard & Poor’s for general obligation debt and revenue bonds. The City is permitted by State law and provisions of the City Charter to levy taxes up to $ 1.20 per $ 100 of assessed valuation for general governmental services including the payment of principal and interest on general obligation long-term debt. The current ratio of tax-supported debt to assessed value of all taxable property is 4.86%. Additional information on the City of Temple’s long term debt can be found in Note III on pages 98 through 106 of this report.

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE GOVERNMENT FUNDS Governmental funds - The focus of the City of Temple’s governmental funds is to provide information on near-term inflows, outflows and balances of spendable resources. Such information is useful in assessing the City’s financing requirements. In particular, unassigned fund balance may serve as a useful measure of a government’s net resources available for spending at the end of the fiscal year. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City of Temple’s governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $ 76,529,986. Approximately 33.64% of this total amount, $ 25,740,895, constitutes assigned/unassigned fund balance. The remainder of the fund balance is reserved to indicate that it is not available for new spending because it is nonspendable for inventory and prepaid items $ 394,439; has already been restricted 1) to pay for debt service, $ 959,697; 2) to pay for drug enforcement, $ 345,852; 3) to pay for library collection enhancement and other, $ 867,470; 4) to pay for bond-funded construction projects, $ 44,922,504; 5) to pay for museum expenditures $ 11,149; 6) to pay for promotion of tourism $ 1,305,093 or 7) committed to drainage in the amount of $ 1,982,887. In the general fund, the City budgeted for a decrease in the fund balance of $ 6,870,464, which was primarily resulting from transfers of $ 2,068,652 to capital project funds, debt service fund, and to the health insurance fund. An additional $ 2,717,909 was to fund capital and economic development matrix incentives. This decrease was a reduction of excess fund balance to fund “pay as you go” capital projects and economic development matrix incentives. The actual fund balance increased for fiscal year 2015 by $ 1,222,032. This increase was due to a net variance with the final adopted budget of $ 8,092,496. This increase was comprised of the following: sales tax for the City came in $ 2,211,743 over the budgeted amount, franchise fees were $ 112,284 over budget, charges for services were $ 282,960 over budget, other revenues were $ 155,833 over budget, and fines were $ 23,939 over budget. All other revenues netted together came in under budget in an amount of $ 333,349. In addition, total expenditures in the General Fund came in $ 5,428,845 under budget. Expenditures coming in under budget falls in line with our budgetary philosophy of “estimating expenditures high”. Hiring lag was one reason that expenditures came in under budget. Other expenditures that came in under budget were tipping fees, electricity, fuel, Airport cost of goods sold, and golf course. Expenditures spread across all departments accounted for $ 1,696,522 of expenditures that came in under budget. Debt service fund balance decreased in 2015 by $ 389,871 for an ending balance of $ 959,697. The decrease in the debt service fund balance was attributable to the use of fund balance for debt payments. Capital projects fund balance had a net increase in 2015 of $ 37,200,812 due to the issuance of bonds and expenditure of prior bond proceeds. Pass-through financing project fund balance decreased by $ 3,930,817 due to the expenditure of bond proceeds issued in 2012. Proprietary funds – The City’s proprietary fund statements provide the same type of information found in the government-wide financial statements, but in more detail.

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 Unrestricted net position of the Water and Sewer fund are $ 31,192,966, an increase of $ 6,480,636. The water and sewer fund unrestricted net position increase in the current fiscal year was due to increase resulted from the increase in revenues related to effluent water sales and the reimbursement from a third party related to the debt service payments for the 2014 Taxable Utility Revenue Bonds. General Fund Budgetary Highlights – The City made revisions to the original appropriations approved by the City Council. Overall these changes resulted in an increase in budgeted expenditures from the original budget of 9.28% or $ 6,076,628. A significant portion of the increase was due to increases in transfers out of $ 1,003,923 to the capital projects fund, $ 85,550 in transfers to the grant fund and $ 89,909 in transfers to the bond programs. During the year there was a $ 4,897,246 increase in appropriations between the original operating budget and final amended budget. Following are the main components of the increase: 

     

$ 2,148,659 increase in personnel services for various departments. Of this amount, o $ 200,339 was re-appropriated from contingency (compensation) to the individual department personnel accounts to cover a 2% Performance Pay made to employees during FY 2015. o $ 316,000 was re-appropriated from contingency (compensation) to fund the enhancements made to the longevity program. o $ 463,101 was re-appropriated from contingency (compensation) to the individual department personnel accounts to cover market adjustments for general government employees. o $ 602,810 was appropriated to the Police department’s overtime accounts to fund outside assignments that are reimbursed by various entities. o $ 401,000 supplemental funding for Fire to cover shortage in personnel services due to authorization of 3 additional overhire positions and additional step-up pay. o $ 125,000 supplemental funding in Special Services to cover the additional separation pay for General Fund employees in FY 2015. $ 598,594 supplemental funding in operations to various departments within the General Fund for projects that were not completed in the previous year. $ 844,592 supplemental funding in capital to various departments within the General Fund for projects that were not completed in the previous year. $ 1,122,300 supplemental funding in economic development to fund additional amount needed for the FY 2015 “Operating Expense Component” and “Incentive Matrix Component” to TEDC. $ 339,574 supplemental appropriation from Reinvestment Zone for the expenditures related to the Downtown Transformation Team. $ 29,219 supplemental appropriation to Fire to fund the Junior Fire Cadet Program for FY 2015. $ 179,639 appropriation of insurance proceeds received from Texas Municipal League related to hail damage that occurred to several facilities during May 2013.

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 The increase in expenditure appropriations was partially possible because of additional anticipated revenues. Increases in revenues were from an increase in various charges for services to cover increases in services provided ($ 1,072,339), increase in insurance proceeds ($ 140,971), increase in appropriation of intergovernmental revenues ($ 257,921) and an increase in other income from various sources ($ 438,018). The remaining increases in expenditure appropriations were funded with Assigned General Fund Balance. ECONOMIC FACTORS AND NEXT YEAR’S BUDGET AND RATES The City’s elected and appointed officials considered many factors when setting the FY 2015 budget, tax rates and fees that will be charged for the business-type activities. One of those factors is the economy. The population growth experienced by the City has stimulated local business and development activity, and the community has placed additional demands on the City to maintain or enhance services provided to our citizens. Temple’s greatest economic strength is the diversified employment base. The three largest job sectors are health and medical, distribution and manufacturing. It is anticipated that future growth for the region will focus on healthcare and small businesses. The City has one of the lowest unemployment rates at 4.87% as compared to the State of Texas, which is 5.0%. The reasonable costs of living and homes priced below the national average continue to make Temple an attractive area for new business locations and re-locations. The City continues to attract new and existing companies due to the strategy of working diligently with corporations on relocation incentives. These indicators are taken into account when adopting the General Fund budget for fiscal year 2016. The total 2015-2016 combined budget appropriation totals $ 119,877,551 for six operating funds. The 2015-2016 General Fund Budget of $ 68,730,216 represents a 4.98% increase or $ 3,263,295 from the adopted 2014-2015 budget. With regard to the FY 2015-2016 budget, the general priorities in the O&M area are as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4.

Serving our community; Improving our infrastructure; Expanding the tax base; and Growing the health and bioscience industries.

These were the general priorities and parameters used in the development of the FY 2014-2015 budget. As always, the preparation of the budget must also take into consideration our ability to pay for the programs and services that were proposed. Overall, the City Council has been presented with a budget that requires $ 2,795,522 from fund balance to assist in the funding of $ 2,095,522 in capital outlay and $ 700,000 for TEDC Matrix allocation to be funded with Assigned Fund Balance – Capital Projects. The budget assesses a tax rate of $ 0.6298 per $ 100 valuation, and increase of $ 0.0434 compared to last year’s actual

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS MANAGEMENTâ€™S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 rate of $ 0.5864 per $ 100. The budget recognizes increases in sales tax, solid waste charges for services, culture & recreation charges for services, and licenses and permits. The General Fundâ€™s largest revenue source in FY 2014-2015 is charges for services. For the fiscal year ending 2013-2014, the General Fundâ€™s largest revenue source was also charges for services. As a cost of service for the Enterprise Fund, Water & Wastewater rates must be sufficiently set to pay the total operations and maintenance, debt and depreciation, and meet bond covenant coverage requirements. During FY 2012, staff engaged the services of a consultant to develop a five-year cost of service study. One of the key elements of the study was to develop the revenue requirement for a five-year capital improvement program to construction, replace or rehab numerous components in the City of Temple distribution and collection systems, address additional staffing needs for the operations and maintenance of the water treatment plant, and other operations and maintenance cost of the system. Multiple scenarios were considered. The rate proposal chosen includes all of the rate adjustment in FY 2013 which achieves the lowest rate at the end of the five-year period. The rate schedule adjusts the minimum bill by meter size in proportion to the ability of the meter to demand water from the system. There are no additional rate increases reflected in the FY 2015 and FY 2016 budget. Over the past years, the City has faced demands from Federal/State regulators to develop a more aggressive schedule of system improvements. Combined with the demands from regulatory agencies and the line relocations associated with TxDOT projects, the City has developed a revised Capital Improvement Program. The rate structure implemented in FY 2013 meets the estimated revenue requirement for the FY 2016 budget of $ 33,466,378, an increase of 1.42% compared with the prior year. Cost drivers for this increase include cash capital outlays and debt service associated with the water and sewer capital improvement plan. The capital improvements include the allocation of $ 17,360,000 to continue the long-term replacement program of water and sewer infrastructure and equipment needs. The table below reflects the capital improvement plan over the next year. Water Wastewater Total

2014 $ 3,646,000 4,460,391 $ 8,106,391

2015 $ 16,784,195 9,715,805 $ 26,500,000

2016 $ 4,250,000 13,110,000 $ 17,360,000

Total $ 24,680,195 27,286,196 $ 51,966,391

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 CONTACTING THE CITY’S FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT This financial report is designed to provide our citizens, taxpayers, customers, and investors and creditors with general overview of the City’s finances and to show the City’s accountability for the money it receives. If you have questions about this report or need additional information, contact the Director of Finance, at City of Temple, 2 North Main, Suite 302, Temple, TX 76501.

Basic Financial Statements

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS STATEMENT OF NET POSITION September 30, 2015 Primary Government

ASSETS Cash Investments Property taxes, net of allowance for uncollectibles Receivables, net of allowance for uncollectibles Due from other governments Inventories Prepaids Other assets Restricted assets: Permanently restricted: Cash and investments Land held for investment Capital assets not being depreciated: Land Construction in progress Capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation: Buildings Infrastructure Furniture and equipment Machinery and equipment Total assets DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES Deferred amounts on refunding Deferred amounts of contributions Deferred amount of investment experience Total deferred outflows of resources

LIABILITIES Vouchers and contracts payable Retainage payable Accrued payroll Deposits Unearned revenues Accrued interest payable Liabilities payable from restricted assets Noncurrent liabilities: Due within one year Due in more than one year Total liabilities DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Deferred amounts on expected and actual experience Total deferred inflows of resources

NET POSITION Net investment in capital assets Restricted for: Debt service Economic development incentives Unrestricted Total net position

Governmental Activities

Business-type Activities

9,650 82,297,605

5,820 29,856,070

Total $

15,470 112,153,675

Component Units Temple Economic Reinvestment Development Zone No. 1 Corporation $

9,646,528

$ 1,926,475 -

456,404

63,704

2,928,893 344,285 287,642 106,797 18,561

1,966,996 308,986 197,930 -

4,895,889 344,285 596,628 304,727 18,561

307,164 -

199,683 13,903 -

1,471,045 -

29,166,413 -

30,637,458 -

12,888,766 -

2,852,063 4,562,130

17,909,330 14,077,352

1,940,240 15,334,058

19,849,570 29,411,410

9,626,472 16,385,128

45,109,664 50,188,854 6,274,639 9,950,794 231,431,515

20,617,896 100,336,030 328,218 3,283,034 203,341,691

65,727,560 150,524,884 6,602,857 13,233,828 434,773,206

550,769 37,714,835 20,335 87,203,701

365,645 39,320 9,959,219

3,004,465 4,494,969 1,680,172 9,179,606

3,061,405 430,622 165,726 3,657,753

6,065,870 4,925,591 1,845,898 12,837,359

297,909 297,909

5,341,170 1,165,410 1,132,170 130,355 2,596,688 653,647

2,117,976 213,954 96,201 70,641 393,262

7,459,146 1,379,364 1,228,371 130,355 2,667,329 1,046,909

1,076,060 258,817 301,756

266,937 -

673,924

8,989,334 182,240,349 202,249,123

5,226,974 96,035,725 104,828,657

14,216,308 278,276,074 307,077,780

2,908,555 45,354,165 49,899,353

63,050 149,094 479,081

1,272,718 1,272,718

173,553 173,553

1,446,271 1,446,271

40,996,292

69,469,800

110,466,092

29,044,848

404,965

959,697

1,334,468

2,294,165

31,192,966 $ 101,997,234

26,326,257 $ 139,086,514

8,557,409 $ 37,602,257

2,599,984 6,475,189 $ 9,480,138

(4,866,709) $ 37,089,280

The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.

14,904,124 29,912,951 10,259,565 5,990,896 112,058 12,312,968 3,683,154 4,237,351 81,413,067

$ $

9,355,529

1,699,274 11,054,803

61,730

30,375,811 30,375,811 $ 57,485,104

$ 4,143,573 4,341,516 1,322,099 11,303,186 3,703,956 2,294,963 27,109,293

26,081,271 26,081,271 $ 107,494,338

Expenses

3,441,849 3,441,849

488,829

83,133 97,044 8,352 102,068 57,916 140,316 488,829

350,000

381,295 381,295 772,321

20,261 357,705 13,060 391,026

General Revenues: Property taxes Sales taxes Franchise fees Mixed beverage taxes Hotel/Motel taxes Other taxes Investment income Miscellaneous income Transfers Total general revenues Change in net position Net position-beginning, as restated Net position-ending

Program Revenues Operating Capital Charges for Grants and Grants and Services Contributions Contributions

The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.

Component units: Reinvestment Zone No. 1 Temple Economic Development Corporation Total component units

Business-type activities: Water and sewer Total business-type activities Total primary government

Functions/Programs Primary government: Governmental activities: General government Public safety Highways and streets Sanitation Health and welfare Culture and leisure services Airport Interest on long-term debt Total governmental activities

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES For the year ended September 30, 2015

20,847,366 21,311,743 6,780,354 156,030 1,440,351 72,392 156,778 746,050 (2,267) 51,508,797 (1,915,122) 39,004,402 $ 37,089,280

(53,423,919)

$ (10,677,418) (25,454,130) (8,929,114) 5,312,290 347,715 (8,538,036) (1,247,875) (4,237,351) (53,423,919)

4,675,835 4,675,835 4,675,835

353,239 2,267 355,506 5,031,341 96,965,893 $ 101,997,234

20,847,366 21,311,743 6,780,354 156,030 1,440,351 72,392 510,017 746,050 51,864,303 3,116,219 135,970,295 $ 139,086,514

4,675,835 4,675,835 (48,748,084)

$ (10,677,418) (25,454,130) (8,929,114) 5,312,290 347,715 (8,538,036) (1,247,875) (4,237,351) (53,423,919)

14,755,023 62,621 1,620,812 16,438,456 7,494,657 30,107,600 37,602,257

(8,943,799)

6,428 1,795,554 1,801,982 3,544,557 5,935,581 9,480,138

1,742,575 1,742,575

Net (Expense) Revenue and Changes in Net Position Primary Government Component Units Governmental Business-type Reinvestment Temple Economic Activities Activities Total Zone No. 1 Development Corp.

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS BALANCE SHEET GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS September 30, 2015

Debt Service

General ASSETS Cash Investments Property taxes, net Other receivables, net Due from other governments Inventories, at cost Prepaid items Restricted cash and investments Museum collection Total assets LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES Vouchers and contracts payable Retainage payable Accrued payroll Vacation and sick leave payable Deposits and refundable contracts Unearned revenues Total liabilities

Fund Balances: Nonspendable: Inventories and prepaid items Restricted for: Debt service Drug enforcement Library and other Construction Museum Promotion of tourism Committed to: Drainage Assigned to: Capital technology acquisition-General Fund Capital projects-General Fund Encumbrances Unassigned Total fund balances Total liabilities and fund balances $

5,050 30,772,526 259,039 2,677,825 46,454 272,842 102,197 995,733 35,131,666

3,314,556 4,600 1,098,512 579,803

Pass-Through Financing Project

Capital Projects

433,185 197,365 40,000 475,312 1,145,862

45,778,031 2,000 60,000 45,840,031

1,673,813 342,632 2,428 -

Nonmajor Governmental Funds

Total Governmental Funds

1,965,703 1,965,703

4,600 3,348,162 209,068 237,831 14,800 4,600 18,561 3,837,622

69,589 794,768 -

283,212 23,410 31,230 27,683

9,650 82,297,607 456,404 2,928,893 344,285 287,642 106,797 1,471,045 18,561 87,920,884

5,341,170 1,165,410 1,132,170 607,486

52,772 2,752,167 7,802,410

186,165 186,165

2,018,873

864,357

77,583 75,975 519,093

130,355 3,014,307 11,390,898

375,039

19,400

394,439

345,852 867,470 -

959,697 -

43,821,158 -

1,101,346 -

11,149 1,305,093

959,697 345,852 867,470 44,922,504 11,149 1,305,093

1,982,887

420,476 4,920,337 2,106,552 18,293,530 27,329,256

959,697

43,821,158

1,101,346

3,318,529

420,476 4,920,337 2,106,552 18,293,530 76,529,986

35,131,666

1,145,862

The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.

45,840,031

1,965,703

3,837,622

87,920,884

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS RECONCILIATION OF THE BALANCE SHEET OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS TO THE STATEMENT OF NET POSITION September 30, 2015 Total fund balances-governmental funds

76,529,986

Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of net position are different because: Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources and therefore are not reported in the funds. These assets consist of: Land Construction in progress Buildings Infrastructure Furniture and equipment Machinery and equipment Accumulated depreciation Total capital assets

17,909,330 14,077,352 78,036,146 134,340,097 22,985,305 30,361,652 (154,199,249) 143,510,633

143,510,633

Deferred outflows of resources represent the consumption of net position that applies to future periods and will not be recognized as an expense until then: Deferred amounts on refunding Deferred amounts of contributions Deferred amounts of investment experience

3,004,465 4,494,969 1,680,172

Some revenues in the governmental funds are deferred because they are not collected within the prescribed time period after year end. On the accrual basis, however, those revenues would be recognized of when they are collected. Maintenance & operations taxes not collected Interest & sinking fund taxes not collected Total deferred revenue reclassified

$ $

231,454 186,165 417,619

417,619

Interest payable on long-term debt does not require current financial resources. Therefore, interest payable is not reported as a liability in the governmental funds balance sheet.

(653,647)

Some long-term liabilities are not due and payable in the current period and therefore are not reported in the funds. Those liabilities consist of: Due within one year Long-term debt, including premium/discount Total long-term liabilities

$ $

8,381,850 182,240,349 190,622,199

(190,622,199)

Deferred inflow of resources represent an acquisition of net position that applies to future periods and so will not be recognized as revenue until then: Deferred amounts on expected and actual experience Net position of governmental activities

(1,272,718) $

The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.

37,089,280

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS For the year ended September 30, 2015

Debt Service

General Revenues: Taxes Franchise fees Licenses and permits Intergovernmental Drainage fees Charges for services Fines Interest and other Total revenues

Expenditures: Current: General government Public safety Highways and streets Sanitation Health and welfare Culture and leisure services Airport Debt service: Principal retirement Interest and fiscal charges Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures

34,058,553 6,780,354 613,187 71,823 22,404,557 2,086,676 1,096,521 67,111,671

Capital Projects

8,282,873 495,383 8,778,256

60,596 60,596

6,638 6,638

Nonmajor Governmental Funds

Total Governmental Funds

1,440,351 808,031 1,125,126 508,062 69,469 3,951,039

43,781,777 6,780,354 613,187 879,854 1,125,126 22,912,619 2,086,676 1,728,607 79,908,200

14,782,723 29,204,662 3,018,125 5,171,235 9,335,393 2,478,744

579,549 1,747,239 9,514,888 6,692 821,565 -

3,937,455 -

83,132 61,825 980,680 157,540 2,204,501 161,884

15,445,404 31,013,726 17,451,148 5,177,927 157,540 12,361,459 2,640,628

46,194 8,976 64,046,052

5,775,000 4,314,846 10,089,846

217,066 12,886,999

3,937,455

3,649,562

5,821,194 4,540,888 94,609,914

(3,930,817)

3,065,619

(1,311,590)

(12,826,403)

Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in Transfers out Issuance of loans and bonds Original issue premium Discount on bond issuance Refunding bonds issued Payment to refunded bond escrow agent Total other financing sources (uses)

14,824 (1,858,411) (1,843,587)

889,270 (43,046) 7,544,558 (7,469,063) 921,719

919,691 (15,075) 46,360,000 3,275,997 (513,398) 50,027,215

Net change in fund balances Fund balances, beginning of year Fund balances, end of year

1,222,032 26,107,224 27,329,256

(389,871) 1,349,568 959,697

37,200,812 6,620,346 43,821,158

Pass-Through Financing Project

The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.

(3,930,817) 5,032,163 1,101,346

301,477

(14,701,714)

64,873 64,873

1,888,658 (1,873,486) 46,360,000 3,275,997 (556,444) 7,544,558 (7,469,063) 49,170,220

366,350 2,952,179 3,318,529

34,468,506 42,061,480 76,529,986

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS RECONCILIATION OF THE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS TO THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES For the year ended September 30, 2015 Net change in fund balances-total governmental funds

34,468,506

Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of activities are different because: Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the statement of activities, the cost of those assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives as depreciation expense. This is the amount by which capital outlays exceeded depreciation in the current period. Capital outlay expenditures Depreciation expense Net adjustment

$ $

15,920,233 (9,402,086) 6,518,147

6,518,147

The net effect of various miscellaneous transactions involving capital assets (i.e. sales, disposals and donations) is to increase net position.

(455,233)

Revenues in the statement of activities that do not provide current financial resources are not reported as revenues in the funds. This adjustment is to recognize the net change in "unavailable" revenues. Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, revenues are not recognized unless they are deemed "available" to finance the expenditures of the current period; accrual- basis recognition is not limited to availability, so certain revenues need to be reduced by the amounts that were unavailable at the beginning of the year and increased by the amounts that were unavailable at the end of the year.

46,105

The issuance of long-term debt (e.g., bonds) provides current financial resources to governmental funds, but issuing debt increases long-term liabilities in the statement of net assets. Repayment of long-term debt principal is an expenditure in the governmental funds, but the repayment reduces long-term liabilities in the statement of net assets. Also, governmental funds report the effect of issuance costs, premiums, discounts, and similar items when debt is first issued, whereas these amounts are deferred and amortized in the statement of activities. This amount is the net effect of these differences in the treatment of long-term debt and related items. Issuance of general obligation bonds Discount/(Premium) on issuance To bondholders Payment to escrow agent for refunding Increase in deferred amount on refunding Amortization of bond premiums/discounts Amortization of bond refunding amounts Net adjustment

(53,330,000) (3,294,110) 5,821,194 6,935,000 534,064 575,034 (263,992) (43,022,810)

(43,022,810)

Some expenses reported in the statement of activities do not require the use of current financial resources and therefore are not reported as expenditures in governmental funds. Increase in compensated absences liability Increase in other post-employment benefits liability Total adjustment

$ $

272,483 165,465 437,948

(437,948)

Governmental funds report contributions to the pension plan as expenditures. However, in the Statement of Activities, pension expense is determined by an actuary as of the measurement period. Contributions Pension Expense

5,618,075 (4,622,208)

Accrued interest expense on long-term debt is reported in the government-wide statement of activities and changes in net assets, but does not require the use of current financial resources; therefore, accrued interest expense is not reported as expenditures in governmental funds. This amount is the change in accrued interest.

(10,316)

Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of self-funded insurance to individual funds. The net revenue of the internal service fund is reported with governmental activities net of amount allocated to business-type activities. Change in net position Net amount allocated to business-type activities

Change in net position of governmental activities

$ $

(17,440) (17,440)

(17,440)

The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.

(1,915,122)

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL GENERAL FUND For the year ended September 30, 2015

Budgeted Amounts Original Final Revenues: Taxes Franchise fees Licenses and permits Intergovernmental Charges for services Fines Interest and other

Total revenues Expenditures: Current: General government: City council City manager Assistant city manager Administrative services Finance Purchasing City secretary Special services Legal City planning Information technology services Human resources Economic development Fleet services Inspections Permits Facility services Total general government Public safety: Municipal court Police Animal control Fire Communications Code Enforcement Total public safety Highways and streets: Street Traffic signals Engineering Totals highways and streets Sanitation: Culture and leisure services: Parks Leisure services Parks & leisure services administration Golf course Education Total culture and leisure services Airport: Debt service: Principal Interest Total debt service Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in Transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) Excess (deficiency) of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses Fund balance, beginning of period Fund balance, end of period

31,883,641 6,360,370 628,500 95,107 21,049,258 2,061,362 670,774 62,749,012

Variance with Final Budget

31,883,641 6,668,070 628,500 353,028 22,121,597 2,062,737 940,688 64,658,261

$ 34,058,553 6,780,354 613,187 71,823 22,404,557 2,086,676 1,096,521 67,111,671

209,204 492,706 243,857 270,931 1,277,171 304,346 356,975 2,077,806 697,468 520,978 2,920,562 662,240 2,119,549 988,916 302,098 250,559 1,216,777 14,912,143

197,343 857,911 199,607 254,280 1,362,585 380,337 403,057 1,410,256 754,344 599,066 3,168,840 687,253 3,241,849 1,110,799 313,063 209,800 1,579,868 16,730,258

161,848 577,167 188,886 204,114 1,340,039 372,628 320,763 1,057,421 712,091 547,756 2,811,338 506,272 3,241,849 1,012,107 284,250 186,051 1,258,143 14,782,723

35,495 280,744 10,721 50,166 22,546 7,709 82,294 352,835 42,253 51,310 357,502 180,981 98,692 28,813 23,749 321,725 1,947,535

669,915 14,563,115 436,705 10,704,765 749,220 513,279 27,636,999

710,867 15,656,565 478,884 11,523,529 749,220 616,908 29,735,973

681,058 15,342,229 437,426 11,462,456 749,220 532,273 29,204,662

29,809 314,336 41,458 61,073 84,635 531,311

2,553,382 345,896 546,276 3,445,554 5,711,665

2,799,129 377,646 566,143 3,742,918 5,858,088

2,228,880 307,040 482,205 3,018,125 5,171,235

570,249 70,606 83,938 724,793 686,853

3,313,452 3,147,425 502,488 1,240,302 1,646,662 9,850,329 2,965,790

3,435,497 3,341,617 549,381 1,293,361 1,716,548 10,336,404 3,016,085

3,025,039 3,084,331 542,871 1,110,934 1,572,218 9,335,393 2,478,744

410,458 257,286 6,510 182,427 144,330 1,001,011 537,341

46,194 8,977 55,171 64,577,651

46,194 8,977 55,171 69,474,897

46,194 8,976 55,170 64,046,052

1 1 5,428,845

(1,828,639)

(4,816,636)

3,065,619

7,882,255

(889,270) (889,270)

14,824 (2,068,652) (2,053,828)

14,824 (1,858,411) (1,843,587)

(2,717,909)

(6,870,464)

1,222,032

26,107,224 23,389,315

The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.

Actual

26,107,224 19,236,760

26,107,224 $ 27,329,256

2,174,912 112,284 (15,313) (281,205) 282,960 23,939 155,833 2,453,410

210,241 210,241 8,092,496 $

8,092,496

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL PASS-THROUGH FINANCING PROJECT FUND For the year ended September 30, 2015 Budgeted Amounts Original Final Revenues: Interest and other Total revenues Expenditures: Highways and streets: Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures Fund balance, beginning of year Fund balance, end of year

Actual -

6,638 6,638

Variance with Final Budget $

6,638 6,638

4,974,414 4,974,414

3,937,455 3,937,455

1,036,959 1,036,959

(4,974,414)

(3,930,817)

1,043,597

5,032,163 $ 57,749

The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.

5,032,163 $ 1,101,346

$ 1,043,597

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS STATEMENT OF NET POSITION PROPRIETARY FUNDS September 30, 2015 Business-type

Governmental

Activities -

Water and Sewer

Internal Service

Fund

ASSETS Current assets: Cash

Investments Customer receivables

5,820

29,856,070

1,643,184

Accounts receivable

323,812

Inventories

308,986

Prepaid items

197,930

1,334,468

673,924

27,158,021

61,502,215

Restricted cash and investments: Revenue bond debt service Customer deposits Construction account Total current assets Noncurrent assets: Capital assets: Land Buildings Improvements other than buildings

1,940,240

47,894,344

168,418,379

Furniture and equipment

1,803,563

Machinery

7,717,453

Less accumulated depreciation Construction in progress

227,773,979

(101,268,561)

15,334,058

141,839,476

Total noncurrent assets

141,839,476

Total assets

203,341,691

3,061,405

Total capital assets (net of accumulated depreciation)

DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES Deferred amounts on refunding Deferred amounts of contributions

430,622

Deferred amount of investment experience Total deferred outflows of resources

The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.

165,726 3,657,753

Business-type

Governmental

Activities -

Water and Sewer

Internal Service

Fund

LIABILITIES Current liabilities: Vouchers and contracts payable

Retainage payables

2,117,976

213,954

Accrued payroll

96,201

Unearned revenues

70,641

Accrued interest - revenue bonds

393,262

Customer deposits

673,924

5,226,974

8,792,932

92,292,424

388,688

2,735,225

Current maturities of long-term liabilities Total current liabilities Noncurrent liabilities: Revenue bonds payable Compensated absences payable Net pension liability Other postemployment benefits payable

619,388

Total noncurrent liabilities

96,035,725

Total liabilities

104,828,657

173,553

69,469,800

1,334,468

DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES Deferred amounts on expected and actual experience Total deferred inflows of resources

NET POSITION Net investment in capital assets Restricted for: Debt service Unrestricted Total net position

31,192,966 101,997,234

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN NET POSITION PROPRIETARY FUNDS For the year ended September 30, 2015

Operating revenues: Charges for sales and services: Water service Sewer service Other Total operating revenues

Business-type Activities Water and Sewer Fund

Governmental Activities Internal Service Fund

16,998,755 11,245,340 2,131,716 30,375,811

Operating expenses: Personnel services Supplies Repairs and maintenance Depreciation Other services and charges Total operating expenses

4,405,792 1,454,823 1,136,329 6,065,845 11,127,914 24,190,703

Operating income

6,185,108

353,240 (1,890,569)

(1,537,329)

4,647,779

Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Interest income Interest expense Total nonoperating revenues (expenses) Income before transfers and contributions Contributions - TxDot Transfer in Transfer out

381,295 2,267 -

(17,440)

5,031,341

(17,440)

99,022,812 (2,056,919) 96,965,893

17,440 17,440

Change in net position Total net position - beginning Prior period adjustment Total net position - restated, beginning Total net position - ending

101,997,234

The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS PROPRIETARY FUNDS For the year ended September 30, 2015

Cash flows from operating activities: Cash received from customers Cash paid to suppliers Cash paid to employees Cash paid to other funds for administration, franchise fees and data processing

Business-type Activities Water and Sewer Fund

Governmental Activities Internal Service Fund

30,166,702 (9,047,712) (4,521,005) (5,225,284)

Net cash provided by operating activities

11,372,701

Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Transfers from other funds Transfers to other funds Net cash provided (used) by noncaptial financing activities Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Capital expenses Interest paid on debt Debt principal payments Proceeds from other governmental entities Proceeds from debt issuance Net cash by capital and related financing activities Cash flows from investing activities: Interest received on investments Net cash provided by investing activities Net change in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

17,440 -

17,440

2,267 -

(17,440)

2,267

(17,440)

(13,567,899) (2,014,843) (3,450,000) 130,190 26,896,684

7,994,132

353,240

19,722,340

39,305,963 59,028,303

(Contintued)

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS PROPRIETARY FUNDS For the year ended September 30, 2015

(Contintued)

Reconciliation of operating income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: Operating income (loss) Adjustments to reconcile operating income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation Change in assets and liabilities: Change in accounts receivable Change in inventory Change in prepaids Change in vouchers payable Change in accrued liabilities Change in opeb liability Change in net pension liability Change in customer deposits Change in accrued vacation and sick leave

Business-type Activities Water and Sewer Fund

Governmental Activities Internal Service Fund

6,185,108

6,065,845

RECONCILIATION OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS FROM STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS TO STATEMENT OF NET POSITION Cash Investments Restricted assets - debt service, and bond proceeds: Cash and investments Total cash and cash equivalents

17,440 -

5,187,593

17,440

11,372,701

5,820 29,856,070

29,166,413 59,028,303

The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.

208,950 17,341 (4,965) (1,012,140) (119,596) 69,856 (106,409) 27,775 40,936

Total adjustments Net cash provided by operating activities

(17,440)

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS STATEMENT OF FIDUCIARY NET POSITION FIDUCIARY FUNDS September 30, 2015 City of Temple Employee Benefits Trust

Agency Fund

ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents Property taxes receivable Other assets Total assets

417,565 417,565

3,248,694 19,194 12,941 3,280,829

LIABILITIES Vouchers payable Unearned revenue Other Total liabilities

417,565 417,565

NET POSITION Held in trust for benefits and other purposes

The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.

18,396 17,689 3,244,744 3,280,829

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FIDUCIARY NET POSITION FIDUCIARY FUNDS For the year ended September 30, 2015 City of Temple Employee Benefits Trust Additions: Contributions: Employer Employee Retiree

Deductions: Benefits

$ Total contributions

3,007,237 1,439,591 518,814 4,965,642

Total additions

4,965,642

Total deductions

4,965,642 4,965,642

Change in net position

Net position held in trust for benefits and other purposes Beginning of year End of year

The notes to the financial statements are an integral part of this statement.

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS September 30, 2015

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES A.

FINANCIAL REPORTING MODEL AND ENTITY

In June 1999, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) issued Statement No. 34, Basic Financial Statements - and Management’s Discussion and Analysis - for State and Local Governments. This statement, known as the “Reporting Model” statement, affects the way the City prepares and presents financial information. State and local governments traditionally have used a financial reporting model substantially different from the one used to prepare private-sector financial reports. GASB Statement No. 34 established new requirements and a new reporting model for the annual financial reports of state and local governments. The Statement was developed to make annual reports easier to understand and more useful to the people who use governmental financial information to make decisions and includes: Management’s Discussion and Analysis - GASB Statement No. 34 requires that financial statements be accompanied by a narrative introduction and analytical overview of the government’s financial activities in the form of a “management’s discussion and analysis” (MD&A). This analysis is similar to the analysis the private sector provides in their annual reports. Government-Wide Financial Statements - The reporting model includes financial statements prepared using full accrual accounting for all of the government’s activities. Government-wide financial statements do not provide information by fund or account group, but distinguish between the City’s governmental activities, business-type activities and activities of its discretely presented component units on the statement of net position and statement of activities. Significantly, the City’s statement of net position includes both noncurrent assets and noncurrent liabilities of the City, which were previously recorded in the General Fixed Assets Account Group and the General Long-Term Obligations Account Group (such as building and infrastructure, including bridges and roads, and general obligation debt). Accrual accounting also reports all of the revenues and cost of providing services each year, not just those received or paid in the current year or soon thereafter. In addition, the government-wide statement of activities reflects depreciation expenses on the City’s capital assets, including infrastructure. In addition to the government-wide financial statements, the City has prepared governmental fund financial statements, which continue to use the modified accrual basis of accounting and the current financial resources measurement focus. Accordingly, the accounting and financial reporting for the City’s General Fund, Capital Projects Fund, Pass-Through Financing Project Fund, and Debt Service Fund, the City’s major governmental funds are similar to that previously presented in the City’s financial statements, although the format of financial statements has been modified by GASB Statement No. 34. Statement of Net Position - The Statement of Net Position is designed to display the financial position of the primary government (governmental and business-type activities) and its discretely presented component units. Governments report all capital assets, including infrastructure, in the governmentwide Statement of Net Position and report depreciation expense - the cost of “using up” capital assets - in the Statement of Activities. The net position of the government will be broken down into three categories - 1) net investment in capital assets; 2) restricted; and 3) unrestricted.

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 I.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) A.

FINANCIAL REPORTING MODEL AND ENTITY (Continued)

Statement of Activities - The new government-wide statement of activities reports expenses and revenues in a format that focuses on the cost of each of the government’s functions. The expense of individual functions is compared to the revenues generated directly by the function (for instance, through user charges or intergovernmental grants). Financial Reporting Entity The City of Temple, Texas (the "City"), a home-rule municipal corporation organized and existing under the provisions of the Constitution of the State of Texas, adopted its first charter March 27, 1907. The City operates under a council-manager form of government and, as authorized by its charter, provides the following services: economic development; education; police, fire and other public safety; highways, streets and engineering; sanitation; health and welfare; parks, recreation and civic center; library; and airport facilities. In evaluating the City’s financial reporting entity, management has considered all potential component units. The decision to include a potential component unit in the financial reporting entity was made by applying the criteria set forth in GASB Statement No. 14. The following legally separate entities are noted as discretely presented component units of the City in a separate column in the combined financial statements to emphasize that they are legally separate from the primary government. Discretely presented component units are entities that are legally separate from the City, but for which the City is financially accountable or whose relationship with the City are such that exclusion would be misleading or incomplete. Discretely Presented Component Units The Reinvestment Zone No. 1 (Zone) was established during 1982 to provide funds for development and improvement projects within the Zone. The receipt of property taxes from taxing units with property within the boundaries of the Zone provides the funding for projects. The Zone has been included in the reporting entity as a non-major discretely presented component unit of the City because the City appoints a voting majority of the board, approves the budget, and maintains the ability to impose its will on the board. The Zone is audited as part of the City of Temple; however, separately issued unaudited financial statements are available through the City of Temple Finance Department, 2 North Main, Suite 302, Temple, Texas 76501. Temple Economic Development Corporation (TEDC) is a legally separate entity from the City. TEDC was created for the purpose of promoting economic development within the City of Temple. The Board of Directors consist of fifteen voting members appointed by the City, acting through its City Council. The Mayor and one other council member periodically designated by resolution of the City Council, the City Manager, and the Chairman of the Board of Directors for the City of Temple Reinvestment Zone No. 1 are voting members of the Board. Of the remaining eleven positions on the TEDC Board (the “Public Directors”), the City Council appoints four voting members from the membership of Board of Directors of the Temple Chamber of Commerce, and four voting members from the membership of the Board of Directors of Temple Industrial Foundation. The remaining three Public Directors are chosen by the City Council from the public at large. The Bell County Judge, the 74

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 I.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) A.

FINANCIAL REPORTING MODEL AND ENTITY (Continued)

Discretely Presented Component Units (Continued) Temple Economic Development Corporation (TEDC) (Continued) President of Temple College, and the Superintendents of the Temple and Belton Independent School Districts are ex officio (non-voting) members of the Board of Directors with the right to have notice of, to attend, and to speak at all meetings of the TEDC Board of Directors. TEDC has been included in the reporting entity as a non-major discretely presented component unit of the City because the City appoints a voting majority of the board, provides 100% of funding for the board and maintains the ability to impose its will on the board. Separately issued audited financial statements are available from TEDC, 2 North 5th Street, Temple, Texas 76501. Related Organizations The Mayor appoints the governing board of the Temple Housing Authority, but cannot remove members or appoint the director, and the Council exercises no control over the governing board. The Authority's operating and capital expenditures, including debt service, are financed entirely from federal grants and rentals, and the City has no involvement in the determination of the Authority’s budget and rental rates or any obligation for the Authority's outstanding debt. The Temple Independent School District and Temple College have their own elected officials and governing board. They are not responsible to the elected officials of the City of Temple and the City is not responsible for their financial matters. The City has no financial accountability for any of these three entities. Accordingly, these entities are excluded from the accompanying financial statements. B.

GOVERNMENT-WIDE AND FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Statement of Net Position and the Statement of Activities are government-wide financial statements. They report information on all of the City of Temple’s nonfiduciary activities of the primary government and its component units with most of the interfund activities removed. Exceptions to this general rule are payments-in-lieu of taxes and other charges between the government’s water and sewer and solid waste functions and various other functions of the government. Elimination of these charges would distort the direct costs and program revenues reported for the various functions concerned. Governmental activities, which are supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues, are reported separately from business-type activities, which rely to a significant extent on fees and charges for services. Likewise, the primary government is reported separately from component units for which the primary government is financially accountable. The Statement of Activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a given function or segment are offset by program revenues. Direct expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific function or segment. Program revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants who purchase, use, or directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided by a given function or segment and 2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational or capital 75

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 I.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) B.

GOVERNMENT-WIDE AND FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

requirements of a particular function or segment. Taxes and other items not properly included among program revenues are reported instead as general revenues. Separate fund based financial statements are provided for governmental funds, proprietary funds and fiduciary funds, even though the latter are excluded from the government-wide financial statements. Major individual governmental funds and major individual enterprise funds are reported as separate columns in the fund financial statements. An emphasis is placed on major funds within the governmental and proprietary categories. GASB Statement No. 34 sets forth minimum criteria (percentage of assets, liabilities, revenues or expenditures/expenses of either fund category for the governmental and enterprise combined) for the determination of major funds. The major governmental funds are the general fund, the debt service fund, the capital projects fund and the passthrough financing project fund. The nonmajor funds are combined in a separate column in the fund financial statements. The internal service fund, which provides services to the other funds of the government, is presented as part of the proprietary fund financial statements. Because the principal users are the Cityâ€™s governmental activities, financial statements of the internal service fund are consolidated into the governmental column when presented at the government-wide level. The costs of these services are reflected in the appropriate functional activity (general government, public safety, highways and streets, etc.). The Cityâ€™s fiduciary fund is presented in the fund financial statements by type. Since by definition these assets are being held for the benefit of a third party and cannot be used to address activities or obligations of the government, this fund is not incorporated into the government-wide statements. C.

MEASUREMENT FOCUS, BASIS OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION

The government-wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting as are the proprietary fund financial statements. Revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of the related cash flows. Property taxes are recognized as revenues in the year for which they are levied. Grants and similar items are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met. Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. In applying the susceptible to accrual concept under the modified accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available. Revenues are considered to be available when they are collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. For this purpose, the City considers revenues to be available if they are collected within 60 days of the end of the current fiscal period. Expenditures generally are recorded when a liability is incurred, as under accrual accounting. However, debt service expenditures, as well as expenditures related to compensated absences and claims and judgments, are recorded only when payment is due. 76

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 I.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) C.

MEASUREMENT FOCUS, BASIS OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION (Continued)

Property taxes, sales taxes, franchise taxes, licenses, and interest associated with the current fiscal period are all considered to be susceptible to accrual and so have been recognized as revenues of the current fiscal period. All other revenue items are considered to be measurable and available only when cash is received by the government. Private-sector standards of accounting and financial reporting issued prior to December 1, 1989, generally are followed in both the government-wide and proprietary fund financial statements to the extent that those standards do not conflict with or contradict guidance of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. Governments also have the option of following subsequent private-sector guidance for their business-type activities and enterprise funds, subject to this same limitation. The City has elected not to follow subsequent private-sector guidance. Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating items. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with a proprietary fund’s principal ongoing operations. The principal operating revenues of the City’s enterprise fund are charges to customers for sales and services. The City also recognizes as operating revenue the portion of tap fees intended to recover the cost of connecting new customers to the system. Operating expenses for the enterprise fund includes the cost of sales and services, administrative expenses, and depreciation on capital assets. All revenues and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as nonoperating revenues and expenses. When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the government’s policy to use restricted resources first, then unrestricted resources as they are needed. D.

FUND ACCOUNTING

The government reports the following major governmental funds: The general fund is the government’s primary operating fund. It accounts for all financial resources of the general government, except those required to be accounted for in another fund. The debt service fund accounts for the resources accumulated and payments made for principal and interest on long-term general obligation debt of governmental funds. The capital projects fund is used to account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities (other than those financed by proprietary funds). Capital projects are funded primarily by general obligation bonds and certificates of obligation. The pass-through financing project fund is used to account for financial resources to be used for the construction of the Northwest Loop 363 project. This project is substantially funded with funds from the Texas Department of Transportation. 77

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 I.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) D.

FUND ACCOUNTING (Continued)

The government reports the following major proprietary fund: The water and sewer fund accounts for the water and sewer services provided to residents of the City. Additionally, the City reports the following fund types: Nonmajor Governmental Funds: Special Revenue Funds are used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue, other than major capital projects and major special revenue funds that are legally restricted to expenditures for specified purposes. These funds consist of the Hotel/Motel Fund, Federal/State Grant Fund, and Drainage Fund. Fiduciary Funds: Fiduciary Funds are used to account for assets held by the City in a trustee capacity or as an agent for individuals, private organizations, other governmental units, and/or other funds. The City accounts for two fiduciary funds, one is a trust fund and one is an agency fund. The trust fund is the City of Temple Employee Benefits Trust which accounts for the activities of the trust to provide City officers, employees, and qualified retirees and their dependents with life, disability, sickness, accident and other health benefits through the purchase of insurance. The agency fund is used to account for assets held by the City, as an agent for the Health & Bioscience Economic Development District. Internal Service Funds: Internal Service Funds are used to account for the financing of services provided by one department to other City departments on a cost-plus basis. The Cityâ€™s Internal Service Fund is the Self-Funded Health Insurance Fund, which is used to account for the activities of the Cityâ€™s self-funded health insurance program. Reconciliation of Government-Wide and Fund Financial Statements A summary reconciliation of the difference between total fund balances as reflected on the governmental funds balance sheet and total net position for governmental activities as shown on the government-wide statement of net position is presented in an accompanying schedule to the governmental funds balance sheet. The asset and liability elements which comprise the reconciliation difference stem from governmental funds using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting while the government-wide financial statements use the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. A summary reconciliation of the difference between net changes in fund balances as reflected on the governmental funds statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances and change in net position for governmental activities as shown on the government-wide statement of activities is presented in an accompanying schedule to the governmental funds statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balance. The revenue and expense elements which comprise the reconciliation 78

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 I.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) D.

FUND ACCOUNTING (Continued)

Reconciliation of Government-Wide and Fund Financial Statements (Continued) difference stem from governmental funds using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting while the government-wide financial statements use the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. E.

ASSETS, DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES, LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES AND NET POSITION

Deposits and Investments

The government’s cash and cash equivalents are considered to be cash on hand, demand deposits, and short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less from the date of acquisition. The City maintains a cash and investment pool that is available for use by all funds. Each fund type’s portion of this pool is displayed on the Statement of Net Position as “Investments”. Income from the cash and investment pool is allocated to the various funds in accordance with the ratio of the funds’ investment. In addition, investments are separately held by several of the City’s funds. Investments are stated at fair value or amortized cost in accordance with GASB Statement No. 31. Money market investments, including U. S. Treasury and agency obligations that have a remaining maturity at the time of purchase of one year or less are stated at amortized cost. Methods used to determine fair value are as follows: securities traded on a national or international exchange are valued at the last reported sales price at current exchange rates, mortgages are valued on the basis of future principal and interest payments, and are discounted at prevailing interest rates for similar instruments. Investments that do not have an established market are reported at estimated fair value. Security transactions and any resulting gains or losses are accounted for by the specific identification method. The investment policies of the City are governed by State Statute and an adopted City Investment Policy. Major provisions of the City’s investment policy include: responsibility for investments, authorized investments, bank and security dealer selection and qualifying procedures, safekeeping and custodial procedures, statement of investment objectives and investment reporting procedures. This policy permits investment in U. S. Treasury or U. S. Agency issues, mutual funds, public funds investment pools and repurchase agreements. Statutes require that securities underlying repurchase agreements be limited to federal government securities having a market value of at least 102% of the cost of the repurchase agreement. 2.

Receivables

Receivables are presented net of allowances for doubtful accounts. The amounts of the allowances by fund are as follows: General Fund Special Revenue Funds Debt Service Fund Enterprise Fund

$ 2,356,233 34,376 90,057 448,709

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 I.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) E.

ASSETS, DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES, LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES AND NET POSITION (Continued)

Inventories and Prepaid Items

Inventories which are expended as they are consumed are stated at cost. Cost is determined for inventories of supplies and fuel using the moving-average method. Prepaid balances are for payments made by the City in the current year to provide services occurring in the subsequent fiscal year and are recorded as prepaid items in both government-wide and fund financial statements. Reported inventories and prepaid items in governmental funds are offset by a fund balance reserve which indicates that they do not constitute available spendable resources even though they are a component of net current position. 4.

Restricted Assets

Certain proceeds of the Cityâ€™s enterprise fund revenue bonds, as well as certain resources set aside for their repayment, are classified as restricted assets on the balance sheet because they are maintained in separate bank accounts and their use is limited by applicable bond covenants. 5.

Capital Assets

Capital assets, which include property, plant, equipment, and infrastructure assets (e.g., roads, bridges, sidewalks, and similar items), are reported in the applicable governmental or business-type activities columns in the government-wide financial statements. Capital assets are defined by the government as assets with an initial, individual cost of more than $ 5,000 and an estimated useful life in excess of five years. Such assets are recorded at historical cost or estimated historical cost if purchased or constructed. Donated capital assets are recorded at estimated fair market value at the date of donation. The costs of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially extend assets lives are not capitalized. Major outlays for capital assets and improvements are capitalized as projects are constructed. Interest incurred during the construction phase of capital assets of business-type activities is included as part of the capitalized value of the assets constructed. The total interest expense incurred by the City during the current fiscal year was $ 7,413,969. Of this amount, $ 1,231,746 was included as part of the cost of capital assets during FY 2015.

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 I.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) E.

ASSETS, DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES, LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES AND NET POSITION (Continued)

Capital Assets (Continued)

Property, plant and equipment of the primary government, as well as the component units, is depreciated using the straight line method over the following estimated useful lives:

Assets

Years

Buildings Building improvements Infrastructure Vehicles Office equipment Computer equipment

40 - 50 20 20 - 50 5-7 5-7 5-7

Compensated Absences

Full-time employees accumulate eight to twelve hours per month for vacation, and can accumulate a maximum credit of two years. Sick leave benefits are earned by full-time employees at a rate of eight hours per month and may be accumulated without limit. In the event of termination, an employee with at least one year continuous service is reimbursed for all accumulated vacation days up to a maximum of one year’s accrued credit. If the terminating employee has at least five years continuous service, reimbursement is also made for all accrued sick leave up to ninety working days. All vacation and sick pay is accrued when incurred in the government-wide and proprietary fund financial statements. A liability for these amounts is reported in governmental fund financial statements only if they have matured, for example, as a result of employee resignations or retirements. 7.

Net Pension Liability

For purposes of measuring the net pension liability, pension related deferred outflows and inflows of resources, and pension expense, City specific information about its Fiduciary Net Position in the Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) and additions to/deductions from the City’s Fiduciary Net Position have been determined on the same basis as they are reported by TMRS. For this purpose, plan contributions are recognized in the period that compensation is reported for the employee, which is when contributions are legally due. Benefit payments and refunds are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms. Investments are reported at fair value. Information regarding the City’s Total Pension Liability is obtained from TMRS through a report prepared for the City by TMRS consulting actuary, Gabriel Roeder Smith & Company, in compliance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions – amendment of GASB Statement No. 27.

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 I.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) E.

ASSETS, DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES, LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES AND NET POSITION (Continued)

Other Post-Employment Benefits

In the government-wide and proprietary fund financial statements, other post-employment benefit (OPEB) liabilities are reported as liabilities for the amount that the annual required contribution exceeds the amount funded by the City on a cumulative basis. The City began reporting this liability for fiscal year 2009 on a prospective basis. 9.

Interfund Transactions

During the course of normal business operations, the City has numerous transactions between funds, including expenditures and transfers of resources to provide services, construct assets, or satisfy certain obligations. These transactions are generally reflected as transfers. Subsidies between funds are recorded as transfers. 10.

Long-Term Obligations

In the government-wide financial statements, and proprietary fund types in the fund financial statements, long-term debt and other long-term obligations are reported as liabilities in the applicable governmental activities, business-type activities, or proprietary fund type statement of net position. Bond premiums and discounts are deferred and amortized over the life of the bonds using the effective interest method. Bond issuance costs are expensed as incurred per GASB 65. In the fund financial statements, governmental fund types recognize bond premiums and discounts, as well as bond issuance costs, during the current period. The face amount of debt issued is reported as other financing sources. Premiums received on debt issuances are reported as other financing sources while discounts on debt issuance are reported as other financing uses. Issuance costs, whether or not withheld from the actual debt proceeds received, are reported as debt service expenditures. 11.

Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources

In addition to assets, the statement of financial position and/or balance sheet will sometimes report a separate section for deferred outflows of resources. This separate financial statement element, deferred outflows of resources, represents a consumption of net position that applies to a future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an outflow of resources (expense/expenditure) until then. The City has the following items that qualify for reporting in this category.   

Deferred charges on refundings – A deferred charge on refunding results from the difference in the carrying value of refunded debt and its reacquisition price. This amount is deferred and amortized over the shorter of the life of the refunded or refunding debt. Pension contributions after measurement date – These contributions are deferred and recognized in the following fiscal year. Difference in projected and actual earnings on pension assets – This difference is deferred and amortized over a closed five year period. 82

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 I.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) E.

ASSETS, DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES, LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES AND NET POSITION (Continued)

11.

Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources (Continued)

In addition to liabilities, the statement of financial position and/or balance sheet will sometimes report a separate section for deferred inflows of resources. This separate financial statement element, deferred inflows of resources, represents an acquisition of net position that applies to a future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an inflow of resources (revenue) until that time. The City has only one type of item that qualifies for reporting in this category. The difference in expected and actual pension experience is deferred and recognized over the estimated average remaining lives of all members determined as of the measurement date. 12.

Net Position

Net Position in government-wide and proprietary financial statements is classified as net investment in capital assets; restricted; and unrestricted. Restricted net position represent constraints on resources that are either externally imposed by creditors, grantors, contributors, or laws or regulations of other governments or imposed by law through state statue. 13.

Fund Balance

The following fund balance classifications describe the relative strength of the spending constraints placed on the purposes for which resources can be used: Nonspendable Fund Balance - Amounts that are not in a spendable form (such as inventory) or are required to be maintained intact. Restricted Fund Balance – amounts constrained to specific purposes by their providers (such as grantors, bondholders, and higher levels of government), through constitutional provisions, or by enabling legislation. Committed Fund Balance – amounts constrained to specific purposes by a government itself, using its highest level of decision-making authority; to be reported as committed, amounts cannot be used for any other purpose unless the government takes the same highest level action to remove or change the constraint. Assigned Fund Balance – amounts a government intends to use for a specific purpose; intent can be expressed by the governing body. The City Council authorizes the assignment of fund balance by resolution. Unassigned Fund Balance – amounts that are available for any purpose; positive amounts are reported in the General Fund. City Council establishes (and modifies or rescinds) fund balance commitments by passage of an ordinance, the highest level of action. This is typically done through adoption of the budget. A fund balance commitment is further indicated in the budget document as a commitment of the fund. Assigned fund balance is established by City Council by passage of a resolution 83

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 I.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) E.

ASSETS, DEFERRED OUTFLOWS OF RESOURCES, LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES AND NET POSITION (Continued)

13.

Fund Balance (Continued) Unassigned Fund Balance (Continued) either through adoption or amendment of the budget as intended for specific purposes. For the classification of Governmental Fund balances, the City considers an expenditure to be made from the most restrictive first when more than one classification is available. In the General Fund, the City strives to maintain an unassigned fund balance to be used for unanticipated emergencies of at least 33% of the annual operating expenditures. This percentage is equal to four months operational expenditures.

14.

Comparative Data/Reclassification

Comparative total data for the prior year have been presented only for individual enterprise funds and in the fund financial statements in order to provide an understanding of changes in the financial position and operations of these funds. Also, certain amounts presented in the prior year data have been reclassified in order to be consistent with the current year’s presentation. 15.

Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U. S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Specifically, the actuarial calculations used to determine the annual required contributions and related liabilities of the City’s two retirement plans and post-employment obligations are based on assumptions about the possibility of events far into the future. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates. F.

NEW AND FUTURE FINANCIAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

The GASB has issued the following statement which became effective in fiscal year 2015. Statement No. 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions - an amendment of GASB Statement No. 27. This statement changes the focus of pension accounting for employers from whether they are responsibly funding their plan over time to a point-in-time liability that is reflected in the employer’s financial statements for any actuarially unfunded portion of pension benefits earned to date.

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 I.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued) F.

NEW AND FUTURE FINANCIAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS (Continued)

The implementation of Statement No. 68 resulted in restatement of beginning net position for the elimination of the previously reported net pension asset, the recording of the beginning net pension liability and the beginning deferred outflow for contributions made after the measurement date. Prospectively applying this change results in the adjustment below:

Net position at September 30, 2014, as previously reported Elimination of net pension liability as of September 30, 2014 Recording of net pension liability as of September 30, 2014 Deferral for pension contributions made after the measurement date Net position at September 30, 2014, as restated

Government-wide Statement of Activities Primary Government Governmental Business-type Activities Activities $

63,671,167

2,464,766

377,726

(31,244,080)

(2,841,634)

4,112,549 $

39,004,402

99,022,812

406,989 $

96,965,893

The GASB has issued the following statements which will become effective in future years. Statement No. 75, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions – This statement changes the focus of accounting of postemployment benefits other than pensions from whether they are responsibility funding the benefits over time to a point-in-time liability that is reflected on the employer’s financial statements for any actuarially unfunded portion of benefits earned to date. This statement will become effective for the City in fiscal year 2018. Statement No. 77, Tax Abatement Disclosures – This statement requires governments that enter into tax abatement agreements to provide certain disclosures regarding these commitments. This statement will become effective for the City in fiscal year 2017. II.

STEWARDSHIP, COMPLIANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY A.

BUDGETARY INFORMATION

Annual budgets are adopted on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles for all governmental funds except the capital projects fund, which adopt project-length budgets. All annual appropriations lapse at fiscal year-end.

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 II.

STEWARDSHIP, COMPLIANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY (Continued) A.

BUDGETARY INFORMATION (Continued)

The City follows these procedures in establishing the budgetary data reflected in the financial statements: 

 



Prior to August 1, the City Manager submits a proposed operating budget to the Director of Finance, who in turn submits it to the City Council for the fiscal year commencing the following October 1. The operating budget includes proposed expenditures and the means of financing them. On or before September 15, the budget is legally adopted by the Council. The City Manager has the authority to transfer appropriation balances from one expenditure category to another within a department. The City Council must approve transfers of appropriations between departments, and any revisions that alter the total expenditures of any fund. Although costs are monitored on an expenditure category level, legal level of control (level at which expenditures may not exceed budget) is the department level. The reported budgetary data has been revised for amendments authorized during the year. Significant amendments were to provide: carry forwards from previous year for projects not complete, appropriations offset by revenues, and capital projects funds from designated fund balance to project funds. Formal budgetary integration is employed as a management control device by expenditure category during the year for the general fund, special revenue funds, and debt service fund. Formal budgetary integration is not employed for the capital projects fund because effective budgetary control is provided by the small number of contracts and projects in this fund, significant costs are subject to bidding, and projects usually span more than one fiscal year. Budgets for the general fund, special revenue funds and debt service fund are adopted on a basis consistent with the modified accrual basis of accounting.

Encumbrance accounting is employed in governmental funds. Encumbrances (e.g., purchase orders, contracts) outstanding at year end are reported within restricted, committed, or assigned fund balance depending upon the specific purpose of the purchase order and do not constitute expenditures or liabilities because the commitments will be reappropriated and honored during the subsequent year. Encumbrances by major funds and nonmajor funds in the aggregate are shown below: Major Funds:

Encumbrances

General Fund Capital Projects Fund Pass-Through Financing Project

$ 2,106,552 12,635,960 1,036,959

Nonmajor Funds:

476,122

Totals

$ 16,255,593

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 III.

DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS A.

DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS

Legal and Contractual Provisions Governing Deposits and Investments The Public Funds Investment Act (Government Code Chapter 2256) contains specific provisions in the areas of investment practices, management reports and establishment of appropriate policies. Among other things, it requires the City to adopt, implement, and publicize an investment policy. That policy must address the following areas: (1) safety of principal and liquidity, (2) portfolio diversification, (3) allowable investments, (4) acceptable risk levels, (5) expected rates of return, (6) maximum allowable stated maturity of portfolio investments, (7) maximum average dollar-weighted maturity allowed based on the stated maturity date for the portfolio, (8) investment staff quality and capabilities, (9) and bid solicitation preferences for certificates of deposit. Statutes authorize the City to invest in (1) obligations of the U.S. Treasury, certain U.S. agencies, and the State of Texas; (2) certificates of deposit, (3) certain municipal securities, (4) money market savings accounts, (5) repurchase agreements, (6) bankers acceptances, (7) mutual funds, (8) investment pools, (9) guaranteed investment contracts, (10) and common trust funds. The Act also requires the City to have independent auditors perform test procedures related to investment practices as provided by the Act. The City is in substantial compliance with the requirements of the Act and with local policies. The funds of the City must be deposited and invested under the terms of a contract, contents of which are set out in the Depository Contract Law. The depository bank places approved pledged securities for safekeeping and trust with the City’s agent bank in an amount sufficient to protect City funds on a day-to-day basis during the period of the contract. The pledge of approved securities is waived only to the extent of the depository bank's dollar amount of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance. Deposits As of September 30, 2015, the City’s deposit balances were as follows: Primary Government

Component Units

Total Reporting Entity

Total Deposits

$ 55,777,947

$ 23,890,441

$ 79,668,388

Carrying Amount

$ 55,483,595

$ 23,815,109

$ 79,298,704

Petty Cash

15,470

Foreign Currency Risk – The City’s deposits are not exposed to foreign currency risk. Custodial Credit Risk – The City’s policy is to be collateralized. The City was fully collateralized during the year for deposits. The policies of the Temple Economic Development Corporation, discretely presented component unit, also require full collateralization. As of September 30, 2015, the Temple Economic Development Corporation had a total of $ 4,808,963 in deposits. Of this amount, $ 482,601 was insured, and $ 4,326,362 was collateralized with securities held by pledging financial institution’s agent in the entity’s name. 87

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 III.

DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS (Continued) A.

DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS (Continued)

Investments As of September 30, 2015, the City had the following investments: Carrying Amount Primary Government Investment pools: Texpool TexSTAR Texas CLASS Total investment in pools:

Total investments Discretely Presented Component Units Investment pools: Texpool TexSTAR Texas CLASS Total investment in pools: Total investments Reporting Entity Total investments

5,621,649 79,298,255 2,387,634 87,307,538

Fair Value

5,621,649 79,298,255 2,387,634 87,307,538

$ 87,307,538

522,806 2,611,656 364,261 3,498,723

3,498,723

$ 90,806,261

Foreign Currency Risk – The City’s investments are not exposed to foreign currency risk. Custodial Credit Risk – The City’s policy requires investments, other than investment pools and money market mutual funds, to be held by a third party custodian bank. All of the City’s investments, other than investment pools, were held by the City’s third party custodian bank in the City’s name. Interest Rate Risk – In accordance with its investment policy, the City manages its exposure to declines in fair value by limiting the weighted average maturity of its investment portfolio to less than nine months. As of September 30, 2015, the weighted average maturity of the City’s investment portfolio was 109.40 days.

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 III.

DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS (Continued) A.

DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS (Continued)

Investments (Continued) Credit Risk – In compliance with the City’s Investment Policy, as of September 30, 2015, the City minimized credit risk losses due to default of a security issuer or backer, by; limiting investments to the safest types of securities; limiting Certificates of Deposit that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC); limiting the City’s investments to obligations issued, guaranteed, insured by or backed by the full faith and credit of the United States or its agencies and instrumentalities; pre-qualifying the financial institutions, broker/dealers, intermediaries, and advisers with which the City will do business; and diversifying the investment portfolio so that potential losses on individual securities were minimized. TexPool has been established for governmental entities in conformity with the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 791 of the Texas Government Code, and the Public Funds Investment Act, Chapter 2256 of the Texas Government Code and operates in a manner consistent with the SEC’s Rule 2a7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The State Comptroller of Public Accounts exercises oversight responsibility over TexPool. Oversight includes the ability to significantly influence operations, designation of management and accountability for fiscal matters. Additionally, the State Comptroller has established an advisory board composed of both Participants in TexPool and other persons who do not have a business relationship with TexPool. Finally, TexPool is rated AAAm by Standard & Poor’s. As a requirement to maintain the rating, weekly portfolio information must be submitted to Standard & Poor’s, as well as the office of the Comptroller of Public Accounts for review. The City’s fair value position is stated at the value of the position upon withdrawal. TexSTAR has been established for governmental entities pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 791 of the Texas Government Code, and the Public Funds Investment Act, Chapter 2256 of the Texas Government Code and operates in a manner consistent with the SEC’s Rule 2a7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. TexSTAR’s governing body is a five-member Board consisting of three representatives of participants and one member designated by each of the co-administrators. The Board holds legal title to all money, investments, and assets and has the authority to employ personnel, contract for services, and engage in other administrative activities necessary or convenient to accomplish the objectives of TexSTAR. Board oversight of TexSTAR is maintained through daily, weekly, and monthly reporting requirements. TexSTAR is rated AAAm by Standard & Poor’s. The City’s fair value position is stated at the value of the position upon withdrawal.

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 III.

DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS (Continued) A.

DEPOSITS AND INVESTMENTS (Continued)

Investments (Continued) Texas CLASS has been established for governmental entities pursuant to the Public Funds Investment Act, Chapter 2256 of the Texas Government Code and operates in a manner consistent with the SEC’s Rule 2a7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. Texas CLASS is supervised by a Board of Trustees who are elected by the Participants. The Board of Trustees supervises the Trust and its affairs and acts as the liaison between the Participants, the Custodian and the Program Administrator. The Board administers the affairs of the Trust and enters into contracts and agreements on behalf of the Trust in order to effectuate the terms of the Trust Agreement. It also selects the consultants for Texas CLASS, including the Program Administrator and the Custodian. Texas CLASS is rated AAAm. The City’s fair value position is stated at the value of the position upon withdrawal. Concentration Risk – The City’s investment in investment pools in divided among three different pools. A reconciliation of cash and investments as shown on the Statement of Net Position for the City follows:

Cash and investments (from above): Cash on hand Carrying amount of deposits Carrying amount of investments Total Statement of Net Position: Cash Investments Restricted cash and investments Total

Primary Government $

15,470 55,483,595 87,307,538

Discretely Presented Component Units $

23,815,109 3,498,723

Total Reporting Entity $

15,470 79,298,704 90,806,261

$ 142,806,603

$ 27,313,832

$ 170,120,435

15,470 112,153,675 30,637,458

$ 1,926,475 9,646,528 15,740,829

$ 142,806,603

$ 27,313,832

$ 170,120,435

1,941,945 121,800,203 46,378,287

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 III.

DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS (Continued) B.

PROPERTY TAXES AND RECEIVABLES

The City's property tax is levied each October 1 on the assessed value listed as of the previous January 1 for all real and business personal property located in the City. The assessed value at January 1, 2014, upon which the fiscal year 2015 levy was based, was $ 3,330,539,054. This amount is the net taxable value adjusted for frozen taxable value. The amount of the levy attributable to frozen taxes was $ 1,915,929. The total levy assessed was $ 21,446,210. The total taxable value before the adjustment for frozen taxable value was $ 3,699,245,668. The tax assessment of October 1, 2014 set a tax levy at $ 0.5864 per $ 100 of assessed valuation at 100% of assumed market value. The City may levy a tax of up to $ 1.20 per $ 100 of assessed valuation. Taxes are due by January 31 following the October 1 levy date, at which time a lien attaches to the property. Property taxes at the fund level are recorded as receivables and deferred revenues at the time the taxes are assessed. Revenues are recognized as the related ad valorem taxes are collected. Additional amounts estimated to be collectible in time to be a resource for payment of obligations incurred during the fiscal year and therefore susceptible to accrual in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been recognized as revenue. At September 30, 2015, delinquent property taxes receivable are $ 456,404, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $ 265,399. Legislation was passed in 1979 and amended in 1981 by the Texas Legislature which affects the method of property assessment and tax collection in the City. This legislation, with certain exceptions, exempts intangible personal property and household goods. In addition, this legislation creates a Property Tax Code and provides, among other things, for the establishment of county-wide appraisal districts and for a State Property Tax Board which commenced operations in January 1980. Since 1982, the appraisal of property within the City has been the responsibility of the Tax Appraisal District of Bell County. The Appraisal District is required under the Property Tax Code to assess all property within the appraisal district on the basis of 100 percent of its appraised value and is prohibited from applying any assessment ratios. The value of property within the Appraisal District must be reviewed at least every five years. The City may challenge appraised values established by the Appraisal District through various appeals and, if necessary, legal action. Under this legislation, the City continues to set tax rates on property within the City limits. However, if the effective tax rate, excluding tax rates for bonds and other contractual obligations, adjusted for new improvements and revaluation, exceeds the rate of the previous year by more than eight percent, qualified voters of the City may petition for an election to determine whether to limit the tax rate to no more than eight percent above the rate of the previous year.

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 III.

DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS (Continued) C.

CAPITAL ASSETS

Capital asset activity for the year ended September 30, 2015 was as follows: Balance October 1, 2014 Primary government: Governmental Activities: Capital assets not being depreciated Land Construction in progress Total capital assets not being depreciated Capital assets being depreciated Buildings Infrastructure Furniture & equipment Machinery & equipment Total capital assets being depreciated Less accumulated depreciation for: Buildings Infrastructure Furniture & equipment Machinery & equipment Total accumulated depreciation Total capital assets being depreciated, net Governmental Activities capital assets, net

16,716,960 17,582,699 34,299,659

Additions Net of CIP Reclassifications

1,192,370 12,407,869 13,600,239

Transfers/ Retirements

(15,913,216) (15,913,216)

Balance September 30, 2015

17,909,330 14,077,352 31,986,682

75,631,772 126,518,285 23,871,180 31,302,023 257,323,260

2,783,547 11,730,407 2,398,070 1,321,186 18,233,210

(379,172) (3,908,596) (3,283,948) (2,261,556) (9,833,272)

78,036,147 134,340,096 22,985,302 30,361,653 265,723,198

(31,254,068) (83,820,727) (18,818,514) (20,281,891) (154,175,200) 103,148,060 137,447,719

(1,893,984) (4,003,678) (1,176,096) (2,328,328) (9,402,086) 8,831,124 22,431,363

221,569 3,673,163 3,283,947 2,199,360 9,378,039 (455,233) (16,368,449)

(32,926,483) (84,151,242) (16,710,663) (20,410,859) (154,199,247) 111,523,951 143,510,633

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 III.

DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS (Continued) C.

CAPITAL ASSETS (Continued) Balance October 1, 2014

Additions

Transfers/

Balance

Retirements

September 30, 2015

Business-type Activities: Capital assets not being depreciated Land

1,717,328

Construction in progress Total capital assets not being depreciated

222,912

1,940,240

17,866,477

11,906,539

(14,438,958)

15,334,058

19,583,805

12,129,451

(14,438,958)

17,274,298

47,789,023

105,320

Capital assets being depreciated Buildings Infrastructure

47,894,343

154,096,963

15,131,186

(809,769)

168,418,380

Furniture & equipment

2,000,890

76,072

(273,398)

1,803,564

Machinery & equipment

7,598,180

306,046

(186,774)

7,717,452

211,485,056

15,618,624

(1,269,941)

225,833,739

Buildings

(26,159,570)

(1,116,877)

(27,276,447)

Infrastructure

(64,747,450)

(4,144,669)

809,769

(68,082,350)

(1,612,232)

(136,512)

273,398

(1,475,346)

Total capital assets being depreciated Less accumulated depreciation for:

Furniture & equipment

(3,953,405)

(667,787)

186,774

(4,434,418)

Total accumulated depreciation

Machinery & equipment

(96,472,657)

(6,065,845)

1,269,941

(101,268,561)

Total capital assets being depreciated, net

115,012,399

Business-type Activiites capital assets, net

9,552,779

134,596,204

21,682,230

(14,438,958)

124,565,178 $

141,839,476

Depreciation expense was charged as direct expense to programs of the primary government as follows: Governmental activities: General government

783,417

Public safety

2,126,829

Highways and streets

2,718,329

Sanitation

900,558

Health and welfare

66,720

Culture and leisure services Airport Total depreciation expense - Governmental Activities

1,617,195 $

1,189,038 9,402,086

$ $

6,065,845 6,065,845

Business-type activities: Water and sewer Total depreciation expense - Business-type Activities

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 III.

DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS (Continued) C.

CAPITAL ASSETS (Continued)

The City has active construction projects as of September 30, 2015. Total accumulated commitments for ongoing capital projects are composed of the following: General Fund

88,817

Capital Projects Fund

9,567,031

Pass-Through Financing Project

550,410

Water and Sewer Fund

3,665,442

Special Revenue Fund-Federal/State Grant Total

12,775 13,884,475

Balance October 1, 2014

Additions

Transfers/

Balance

Retirements

September 30, 2015

Discretely presented component units: Reinvestment Zone No 1: Capital assets not being depreciated Land

Construction in progress Total capital assets not being depreciated

6,394,172

7,214,577

(3,982,277)

9,626,472

5,649,243

14,519,093

(3,783,208)

16,385,128

12,043,415

21,733,670

(7,765,485)

26,011,600

1,103,035

(340,000)

763,035

53,473,721

3,504,790

56,978,511

42,559

54,619,315

3,504,790

(340,000)

57,784,105

Capital assets being depreciated Buildings Infrastructure Machinery & equipment Total capital assets being depreciated Less accumulated depreciation for: Buildings Infrastructure Machinery & equipment Total accumulated depreciation Total capital assets being depreciated, net Reinvestment Zone No.1 capital assets, net

(261,873)

(24,058)

73,665

(212,266)

(16,831,965) (19,387)

(2,431,711)

(19,263,676)

(2,837)

(17,113,225)

(22,224)

(2,458,606)

73,665

(19,498,166)

37,506,090 49,549,505

1,046,184 22,779,854

(266,335) (8,031,820)

38,285,939 64,297,539

413,931

47,400

461,331

Temple Economic Development Corporation: Buildings & improvements Office equipment Total capital assets being depreciated

175,347

40,814

(38,205)

177,956

589,278

88,214

(38,205)

639,287

Less accumulated depreciation for: Buildings & improvements Office equipment Total accumulated depreciation Temple Economic Development Corp. capital assets, net

(84,603)

(11,083)

(95,686)

(169,537)

(7,167)

38,068

(138,636)

(254,140)

(18,250)

38,068

(234,322)

335,138

69,964

(137)

404,965

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 III.

DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS (Continued) D.

INTERFUND RECEIVABLES AND PAYABLES

Interfund receivables represent advances to special revenue funds to be repaid with future grant revenues and future operating revenues. Interfund receivables also represent advances to capital projects fund to be repaid with future bond proceeds. At September 30, 2015, there were no individual interfund receivable and payable balances to report. E.

DISAGGREGATION OF RECEIVABLES AND PAYABLES

Receivables at September 30, 2015, in the Statement of Net Position were as follows: Property (Net of Allowance)

Other (Net of Allowance)

General Fund Debt Service Fund Capital Projects Fund Nonmajor Governmental Funds Water & Sewer Fund

259,039 197,365 -

Total

456,404

Other Governments

Total Receivables

$ 2,677,825 40,000 2,000 209,068 1,966,996

46,454 60,000 237,831 -

$ 2,983,318 237,365 62,000 446,899 1,966,996

$ 4,895,889

344,285

$ 5,696,578

Payables at September 30, 2015, in the Statement of Net Position were as follows: Vouchers & Contracts General Fund $ 3,314,556 Capital Projects Fund 1,673,813 Pass-Through Financing Project 69,589 Nonmajor Governmental Funds 283,212 Water and Sewer Fund 2,117,976

Retainages $ 4,600 342,632 794,768 23,410 213,954

Accrued Payroll $ 1,098,512 2,428 31,230 96,201

Deposits $ 52,772 77,583 673,924

Total Payables $ 4,470,440 2,018,873 864,357 415,435 3,102,055

Total

$ 1,379,364

$ 1,228,371

$ 10,871,160

$ 7,459,146

804,279

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 III.

DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS (Continued) E.

DISAGGREGATION OF RECEIVABLES AND PAYABLES (Continued)

Liabilities payable from restricted assets at September 30, 2015, in the Statement of Net Position were as follows: Water & Sewer Fund Customer Deposits

673,924

DEFERRED AMOUNT ON REFUNDING

The amounts reported for deferred amount of refunding balances of the City for the year ended September 30, 2015:

Balance October 1, 2014 Governmental Activities General obligation bonds Total governmental activities

Business-Type Activities General obligation bonds Total business-type activities Component Units Reinvestment Zone No. 1 Total component units Total government

2,734,394 2,734,394

Additions $

Retirements

534,063 534,063

263,992 263,992

Balance September 30, 2015 $

3,004,465 3,004,465

2,997,157 2,997,157

357,597 357,597

293,349 293,349

3,061,405 3,061,405

349,318 349,318

51,409 51,409

297,909 297,909

6,080,869

891,660

608,750

6,363,779

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 III.

DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS (Continued) G.

UNEARNED REVENUE

Governmental funds report unearned revenues in connection with receivables of revenues that are not considered to be available to liquidate liabilities of the current period. Governmental funds also defer revenue recognition in connection with resources that have been received, but not yet earned. At the end of the current fiscal year, the various components of deferred inflows of resources and unearned revenue reported in the governmental funds were as follows: Deferred Governmental Activities General Fund: Delinquent property taxes Street escrow Parks escrow Police escrow Child safety fees Animal shelter Electric franchise Gas franchise Other

Debt Service Fund: Delinquent property taxes

231,454 -

269,313 334,803 119,987 222 20 1,478,184 310,477 7,707

Total

231,454 269,313 334,803 119,987 222 20 1,478,184 310,477 7,707

186,165

75,975

417,619

$ 2,596,688

$ 3,014,307

Nonmajor governmental funds: Grant draw downs prior to meeting all eligibility requirements Total Governmental Funds

Unearned

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 III.

DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS (Continued) H.

LONG-TERM DEBT

The following is a summary of long-term debt transactions, including current portion of the City for the year ended September 30, 2015: Balance October 1, 2014, restated Governmental Activities General obligation bonds $ 49,525,000 Certificates of obligations 20,830,000 Contractual obligations 5,065,000 Revenue bonds 910,000 Pass-through agreement revenue & limited tax bonds 24,700,000 Notes payable 242,013 Plus deferred amount: Issuance premium 6,579,141 Issuance discount (702,726) Compensated absences 7,086,249 Net pension liability -TMRS 20,838,649 Net pension liability - FP 10,405,430 OPEB liability 2,198,867 Total governmental activities 147,677,623 Business-Type Activities General obligation bonds Revenue bonds Plus deferred amount: Issuance premium Issuance discount Compensated absences Net pension liability - TMRS OPEB liability Total business-type activities Component Units Reinvestment Zone No. 1 Temple Economic Development Corp. Total component units Total government

Additions

Retirements

$ 32,100,000 21,230,000 -

6,205,000 5,410,000 650,000 445,000

Balance September 30, 2015 $

46,194

75,420,000 36,650,000 4,415,000 465,000

Due within one year $

4,760,000 1,575,000 665,000 465,000

24,700,000 195,819

120,000 48,105

3,850,554 (556,444) 738,784 574,343 165,466 58,102,703

692,347 (117,313) 439,079 780,336 14,550,643

9,737,348 (1,141,857) 7,385,954 20,058,313 10,979,773 2,364,333 191,229,683

877,433 (128,690) 607,486 8,989,334

36,480,000 35,120,000

4,680,000 23,685,000

2,160,000 5,950,000

39,000,000 52,855,000

2,240,000 2,475,000

2,978,444 (435,991) 395,173 2,841,634 549,532 77,928,792

3,472,646 (179,083) 86,250 69,857 31,814,670

260,498 (35,877) 39,733 106,409 8,480,763

6,190,592 (579,197) 441,690 2,735,225 619,389 101,262,699

530,949 (71,978) 53,003 5,226,974

51,006,275

2,743,555

48,262,720

2,908,555

261,021 51,267,296

4,386 4,386

53,263 2,796,818

212,144 48,474,864

63,050 2,971,605

$ 276,873,711

$ 89,921,759

$ 25,828,224

340,967,246

$ 17,187,913

The General Fund, Hotel/Motel Fund, Federal/State Grant Fund and the Drainage Fund are responsible for liquidating the liability for compensated absences, the net pension liability for employees employed in the corresponding governmental funds. The General Fund has been responsible for liquidating the net OPEB liability for all employees in the corresponding governmental funds. 98

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 III.

DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS (Continued) H.

LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

Long-term debt at September 30, 2015 is comprised of the following:

General obligation bonds: $ 9,660,000 2008 bonds due in annual installments of $ 50,000 to $ 845,000 through 2028; interest at 3.50% to 5.25% $ 13,995,000 2009 bonds due in annual installments of $ 190,000 to $ 1,130,000 through 2029; interest at 2.50% to 4.25% $ 3,950,000 2009 refunding bonds due in annual installments of $ 395,000 to $ 625,000 through 2017; interest at 2.00% to 3.00% $ 24,120,000 2011 refunding bonds due in annual installments of $ 245,000 to $ 3,250,000 through 2023; interest at 2.00% to 4.00% $ 3,045,000 2011A refunding bonds due in annual installments of $ 40,000 to $ 785,000 through 2017; interest at 2.00% to 4.255% $ 24,895,000 2012 refunding bonds due in annual installments of $ 10,000 to $ 3,820,000 through 2026; interest at 2.00% to 5.00% $ 21,360,000 2014 refunding bonds due in annual installments of $ 535,000 to $ 3,460,000 through 2026; interest at 2.00% to 5.00% $ 36,780,000 2015 refunding & improvement bonds due in annual installments of $ 590,000 to $ 4,480,000 through 2035; interest at 2.00% to 5.00% Certificates of obligation: $ 13,520,000 2008 certificates due in annual installments of $ 35,000 to $ 1,155,000 through 2028; interest at 3.0% to 5.25% $ 9,420,000 2012 certificates due in annual installments of $ 400,000 to $ 685,000 through 2033; interest at 2.00% to 3.00% $ 4,645,000 2012 taxable certificates due in annual installments of $ 50,000 to $ 410,000 through 2032; interest at 1.50% to 3.50% $ 21,230,000 2014 certificates due in annual installments of $ 255,000 to $ 1,815,000 through 2034; interest at 1.00% to 3.00%

Business Type Activities

Governmental Activities

970,000

11,750,000

990,000

8,600,000

11,165,000

1,550,000

6,145,000

17,325,000

13,315,000

5,830,000

32,100,000 75,420,000

4,680,000 39,000,000

1,355,000

9,420,000

4,645,000

21,230,000 36,650,000

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 III.

DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS (Continued) H.

LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued) Business Type Activities

Governmental Activities Contractual obligations: $ 5,710,000 2013 limited tax notes due in annual installments of $ 645,000 to $ 970,000 through 2020; interest at 1.00% to 2.00%

Revenue bonds: $ 3,550,000 2005 bonds due in annual installments of $ 110,000 to $ 465,000 through 2015; interest at 5.27% $ 15,030,000 2008 bonds due in annual installments of $ 445,000 to $ 1,125,000 through 2028; interest at 3.50% to 5.25% $ 17,210,000 2010 bonds due in annual installments of $ 550,000 to $ 1,925,000 through 2030; interest at 2.25% to 3.75% $ 12,990,000 2014 bonds due in annual installments of $ 90,000 to $ 790,000 through 2044; interest at 0.45% to 5.05% $ 23,685,000 2015 bonds due in annual installments of $ 830,000 to $ 1,755,000 through 2035; interest at 2.00% to 5.00% Pass-through agreement revenue & limited tax bonds: $ 24,700,000 2012 bonds due in annual installments of $ 120,000 to $ 2,310,000 through 2034; interest at 2.00% to 5.00% Notes payable: $ 275,450 2014 capital lease due in monthly installments of $ 3,665 to $ 4,296 through 2017; interest at 4.20%

100

4,415,000 4,415,000

465,000

1,320,000

14,950,000

12,900,000

465,000

23,685,000 52,855,000

24,700,000 24,700,000

195,819 195,819

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 III.

DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS (Continued) H.

LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued) Business Type Activities

Governmental Activities Issuance premium Issuance discount Accrual for compensated absences Accrual for net pension liability - TMRS Accrual for net pension liability - FP Accrual for OPEB liability

Total primary government debt Component Units: Reinvestment Zone No 1: $ 10,875,000 2009 general obligation bonds due in annual installments of $ 100,000 to $ 1,440,000 through 2019, interest at 2.00% to 3.125%; guaranteed by the City of Temple $ 10,405,000 2011A general obligation bonds due in annual installments of $ 145,000 to $ 2,405,000 through 2022, interest at 2.00% to 5.00%; guaranteed by the City of Temple $ 480,000 2012 general obligation bonds due in annual installments of $ 10,000 to $ 75,000 through 2022, interest at 2.00% to 5.00%; guaranteed by the City of Temple $ 10,365,000 2008 taxable revenue bonds due in annual installments of $ 215,000 to $ 1,180,000 through 2022, interest at 5.29%; guaranteed by the City of Temple $ 25,260,000 2013 certificates of obligation due in annual installments of $ 1,110,000 to $ 2,010,000 through 2033, interest at 2.00% to 4.125%; guaranteed by the City of Temple Issuance premium Issuance discount Temple Economic Development Corporation: $ 252,946 note due in five annual principal payments through January 2019, interest at 2.25% . Monthly interest paid by an individual. Accrual for compensated absences

9,737,348 (1,141,857) 7,385,954 20,058,313 10,979,773 2,364,333 49,383,864

6,190,592 (579,197) 441,690 2,735,225 619,389 9,407,699

191,229,683

101,262,699

5,565,000

9,215,000

470,000

7,105,000

25,260,000 1,233,346 (585,626)

199,683 12,461

Total component units debt

48,474,864

Total debt - reporting entity

$ 239,704,547

$101,262,699

101

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 III.

DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS (Continued) H.

LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

The annual requirements to amortize debt outstanding as of September 30, 2015, are shown on the following schedules. Due to the nature of the obligation for compensated absences, annual requirements to amortize such obligations are not determinable and have not been included in the following summary. General Obligation Bonds Governmental Activities Year Ending September 30 Principal Interest 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-2025 2026-2030 2031-2035

4,760,000 4,035,000 4,785,000 4,960,000 5,080,000 25,405,000 17,705,000 8,690,000

Total

$ 75,420,000

2,810,421 2,901,588 2,759,438 2,609,288 2,451,688 8,969,140 3,975,039 1,345,500

$ 27,822,102

Principal

2,240,000 2,270,000 3,035,000 3,130,000 3,235,000 18,630,000 6,460,000 -

$ 39,000,000

Certificates of Obligations Governmental Activities Year Ending September 30 Principal Interest 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-2025 2026-2030 2031-2034

1,575,000 2,075,000 800,000 895,000 1,040,000 8,585,000 12,010,000 9,670,000

Total

$ 36,650,000

1,003,164 963,214 917,239 903,139 885,064 3,947,281 2,564,351 688,424

$ 11,871,876

Component Units

Business-type Activities

Principal

Interest

1,955,000 2,000,000 2,045,000 2,110,000 2,275,000 4,865,000 -

$ 10,659,886

$ 15,250,000

1,456,236

1,432,500 1,364,400 1,273,350 1,171,300 3,605,350 356,750

Interest $

550,025

$ 13,771,682

498,750

13,137,838

431,700

14,420,538

368,600

14,451,238

302,850

14,515,838

283,500

61,757,990

28,496,789

10,035,500

$ 2,435,425

$170,587,413

Component Units Principal $

1,110,000 1,145,000 1,180,000 1,215,000 6,695,000 8,140,000 5,775,000

$ 25,260,000

102

Interest $

924,894 924,894 902,693 868,344 832,944 3,478,187 2,163,263 476,337

$ 10,571,556

Total $

Total

3,503,058 5,073,108 3,764,932 3,846,483 3,973,008 22,705,468 24,877,614 16,609,761

$ 84,353,432

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 III.

DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS (Continued) H.

LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued) Contractual Obligations Governmental Activities Year Ending September 30

Principal

Interest

Total

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

665,000 910,000 925,000 945,000 970,000

88,300 75,000 56,800 38,300 19,400

753,300 985,000 981,800 983,300 989,400

Total

4,415,000

277,800

4,692,800

Pass-Through Agreement Revenue & Limited Tax Bonds Governmental Activities Year Ending September 30 Principal Interest 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-2025 2026-2030 2031-2034

120,000 895,000 925,000 950,000 990,000 5,635,000 7,955,000 7,230,000

Total

$ 24,700,000

1,139,875 1,137,475 1,110,625 1,082,875 1,044,875 4,530,075 2,866,625 898,575

$ 13,811,000

103

Total $

1,259,875 2,032,475 2,035,625 2,032,875 2,034,875 10,165,075 10,821,625 8,128,575

$ 38,511,000

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 III.

DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS (Continued) H.

LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

Revenue Bonds Governmental Activities

Business-type Activities

Component Units

Year Ending September 30 2016

Principal $

Interest

465,000

Principal

12,253

Interest

2,475,000

Principal

1,958,474

Interest

865,000

Total

375,854

6,151,581

2017

2,380,000

2,061,599

910,000

330,096

5,681,695

2018

1,745,000

1,987,954

960,000

281,958

4,974,912

2019

1,795,000

1,939,269

1,010,000

231,174

4,975,443

2020

1,855,000

1,893,319

1,060,000

177,744

4,986,063

2021-2025

10,255,000

8,533,883

2,300,000

184,091

21,272,974

2026-2030

16,190,000

6,189,205

22,379,205

2031-2035

10,285,000

3,036,597

13,321,597

2036-2040

2,940,000

1,201,395

4,141,395

2041-2044

2,935,000

379,759

3,314,759

12,253

$ 52,855,000

$ 29,181,454

7,105,000

$ 1,580,917

$ 91,199,624

Total

465,000

Notes Payable Governmental Activities

Component Units Activities

Year Ending September 30 2016

Interest

48,105

Principal

7,065

49,921

2017

50,096

5,074

49,921

2018

97,618

948

49,921

2019

49,920

Total

(1)

Principal

195,819

13,087

199,683

Interest $

Total -

105,091

49,920

260,102

General Obligation Bonds and Certificates of Obligation General Obligation Bonds are direct obligations issued on a pledge of the general taxing power for the payment of the debt obligations of the City. General Obligation Bonds and Certificates of Obligation require the City to compute, at the time other taxes are levied, the rate of tax required to provide (in each year bonds are outstanding) a fund to pay interest and principal at maturity. The City is in compliance with this requirement. Arbitrage provisions of the Internal Revenue Tax Act of 1986 require the City to rebate excess arbitrage earnings from bond proceeds to the federal government.

104

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 III.

DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS (Continued) H. (2)

LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued) Revenue Bonds Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds constitute special obligations of the City solely secured by a lien on and pledge of the net revenues of the water and sewer system. The Revenue Bonds are collateralized by the revenue of the water and sewer system established by the bond ordinances. The ordinances provide that the revenue of the system is to be used first to pay operating and maintenance expenses of the system and second to establish and maintain the Revenue Bond funds. Remaining revenues may then be used for any lawful purpose. The ordinances also contain provisions which, among other items, restrict the issuance of additional Revenue Bonds unless the special funds noted above contain the required amounts and certain financial ratios are met. The City is in compliance with all significant financial requirements as of September 30, 2015.

(3)

Taxable Revenue Bonds Taxable Revenue Bonds constitute special obligations of the City and are payable from and secured by an irrevocable first lien on and pledge of the net revenues of the Airport, and said net revenues are further pledged irrevocably to the establishment and maintenance of the funds. The Taxable Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, are collateralized by the net revenue of the Airport established by the bond ordinance. The ordinance provides that the revenue of the Airport is to be used first to pay operating and maintenance expenses of the Airport and second to establish and maintain the Taxable Revenue Bond funds. The ordinance also contains provisions which, among other items, restrict the issuance of additional debt, unless the City has sufficient funds to establish and maintain funds for the payment thereof. The City is in compliance with all significant requirements as of September 30, 2015. The Taxable Revenue Bonds, Series 2008, are collateralized by the tax increment generated by the Reinvestment Zone No.1 (a discretely presented component unit) by the First Supplemental Ordinance to the Master Ordinance Establishing the City of Temple, Texas Reinvestment Zone Number One Tax Increment Revenue Financing Program. The ordinance provides that the revenue of the Reinvestment Zone No. 1 be used to meet all financial obligations related to the bonds. The City is in compliance with all significant requirements as of September 30, 2015.

105

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 III.

DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS (Continued) H. (4)

LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued) 2015 Refunding/Issuances On November 4, 2014, the City issued $ 21,230,000 of Combination Tax and Revenue Certificates of Obligation bonds. The interest rate of the bonds range from 1.0% to 3.0% and the maturity date of the bonds is August 1, 2034. These bonds were issued to construct, reconstruct, improve, extend, expand, upgrade and/or develop streets bridges, sidewalks, intersections, traffic signalization, and other traffic improvement projects as part of the second phase of the Cityâ€™s Transportation Capital Improvement Program. On September 30, 2015, the City issued $ 23,685,000 of Utility System Revenue bonds. The interest rate of the bonds range from 2.0% to 5.0% and the maturity date of the bonds is August 1, 2035. These bonds were issued for the construction of water and sewer line improvement projects and other costs associated with these projects. On September 30, 2015, the City issued $ 25,130,000 of General Obligation bonds. The interest rate of the bonds range from 2.0% to 5.0% and the maturity date of the bonds is August 1, 2035. These bonds were issued to construct, acquire, improve, renovate, expand, develop and equip land and buildings for park and recreational purposes including the acquisition of any necessary sites, infrastructure and other related costs. On September 30, 2015, the City partially advance refunded the Series 2008 General Obligation Bonds, the Series 2008A Certificate of Obligation Bonds, and the 2008 Utility Revenue Bonds. The par amount of the 2015 General Obligation Refunding bonds was $ 11,650,000. Net proceeds of $ 12,486,660 of general obligation refunding bonds (after payment of underwriting fees and other issuance costs) were deposited into an irrevocable trust with an escrow agent for the purpose of generating resources for all future debt service payments for the refunded debt. As a result, the refunded bonds are considered defeased, and the debt for these bonds has been removed from the Cityâ€™s financial statements. This advanced refunding will reduce the total debt service payments over the next 14 years by $ 791,094 and will result in an economic gain (i.e. the difference between the present value of the debt service payments of the refunded debt and the refunding bonds) of $ 658,587.

In the debt service fund, a fund balance of $ 959,697 is available to service general long-term debt. The bond indentures require the establishment and maintenance of interest and sinking funds and reserve funds in varying amounts. Restricted cash on the accompanying combined balance sheet represents these amounts. The enterprise fund has restricted cash of $ 29,166,413, of which $ 1,334,468 will be used to pay accrued interest and current maturities of bond indentures, $ 27,158,021 represents remaining bonds proceeds, and the remaining $ 673,924 represents customer security deposits. In addition, there are restrictions concerning the maintenance of sufficient rates charged for services to users to generate enough funds for debt service requirements, the maintenance of accounting records and insurance as well as reporting the results of the City's operations to specified major bondholders. The City is in compliance with all significant requirements and restrictions contained in the bond indentures. 106

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 III.

DETAILED NOTES ON ALL FUNDS (Continued) H.

INTERFUND TRANSFERS

Interfund transfers during the year ended September 30, 2015 were as follows: Transfers In

Major Funds: General Debt Service Capital Projects

Nonmajor Governmental Funds: Special Revenue Subtotal of Governmental Funds Water and Sewer Fund Internal Service Fund Total

Transfers Out

14,824 889,270 919,691

$ 1,808,961 -

64,873

64,525

1,888,658

1,873,486

2,268

17,440

$ 1,890,926

Transfers between major funds and other nonmajor governmental funds were primarily to support capital projects and operation of funds. IV.

OTHER INFORMATION A.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Litigation The City is a defendant in various lawsuits. Although the outcome of these lawsuits is not presently determinable, in the opinion of the City Attorney the resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the government. Grants Amounts received or receivable from grant agencies are subject to audit and adjustment by grantor agencies, principally the federal government. Any disallowed claims, including amounts already collected, may constitute a liability of the applicable funds. The amount, if any, of expenditures that may be disallowed by the grantor cannot be determined at this time, although the City expects such amounts, if any, to be immaterial.

107

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) A.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

Long-Term Agreements The City has the following long-term agreements which represent significant commitments: Operation of Doshier Farm and Temple-Belton Wastewater Treatment Plants – Two different commercial entities have provided operations and maintenance of the Doshier Farm and TempleBelton Wastewater Plants (WWTP), twenty-nine (29) lift stations (serving the Doshier Farm WWTP and the Temple-Belton WWTP), and the City’s industrial pretreatment program since October 1, 1994. In September 2003, the City added the operations and maintenance of the reuse system that delivers treated wastewater effluent to irrigate City owned ball fields and the service the Panda Power Plant. On August 7, 2014, the City entered into an agreement with Brazos River Authority (BRA) to provide the operations listed above for the period October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2019. Upon mutual agreement of the parties, the agreement may be extended for two additional 5 year periods. The City retains ownership of the Doshier Farm WWTP and the City’s 75% share of the TempleBelton WWTP and all associated equipment. The City of Belton owns the remaining 25%. The City also retains all relevant permits in its name. The City’s major responsibility is paying the contractor the agreed annual compensation in monthly installments due on the first of each month. The base fee for the second year (2016) of the agreement is $ 1,175,564 for the Temple-Belton WWTP, $ 1,011,141 for the Doshier Farm WWTP and Lift Stations, and $ 136,901 for the City’s industrial pretreatment program. On or before May 1st of each year, BRA will provide the City with an annual budget which will include an estimate of all operation and maintenance expenses plus a management fee of 3% for the Doshier WWTP, Temple-Belton WWTP, and the lift stations. The budget will be calculated based on the estimated amount of wastewater to be delivered to the plants in the next fiscal year. The City must approve the proposed budget by July 15th of each year. Operation and maintenance expenses and the maintenance fee for the Temple-Belton WWTP will be allocated based upon the annual flow percentages of each City. Any capital expenses for the Temple-Belton WWTP (costs of capital improvements) will be allocated to the Cities based on ownership - 75% to Temple and 25% to Belton. Payments to BRA will be made monthly and will equal 1/12 of the approved annual budget. Landfill Operations - On March 16, 2011, the City renegotiated its agreement with the commercial entity to operate the City’s solid waste landfill. Under the terms of the new agreement, the contractor pays the City $ 659,587 annually ($ 54,965.60 per month). In addition, the contractor pays a fee for each ton of solid waste disposed at the landfill, regardless of the source or point of origin of the waste, with a guaranteed minimum surcharge equivalent to 200,000 tons per year. The fee per ton is calculated as follows on waste disposed at the landfill each year: $ 2.78/ton up to 200,000 tons $ 3.46/ton over 200,000 tons The new agreement is for a period of thirty years, or the life of the landfill, if less and may be extended by mutual agreement of the parties for additional ten (10) year period. Under the terms of the agreement, 108

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) A.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

Long-Term Agreements (Continued) Landfill Operations (Continued) the contractor is responsible for all costs of operating the landfill, including the costs of closure, postclosure care cost and compliance with federal and state requirements. Lease and Operating Agreement - Public Library - Effective September 7, 1995, the City entered into a ninety-nine (99) year lease and operating agreement with the Foundation of the Temple Public Library to use the E. Rhodes and Leona B. Carpenter Plaza for the location of the public library. Under the lease agreement, the City will pay no rent or deposit in consideration of its operation of the public library and management of the commercial office spaces on the third floor. As part of the agreement, the City funded $ 500,000 as its share of the cost of renovating the building for the library and applied the funds from a $ 300,000 grant to the purchase of an automation system. Future Agreements On September 16, 2010, City Council authorized a pass through financing agreement with the Texas Department of Transportation (Department) for improvements to Northwest Loop 363. On September 30, 2010, the Texas Transportation commission passed Minute Order 112305, authorizing the Department to enter a pass-through toll agreement with the City for the construction of the Loop 363 north frontage road, from the BNSF railroad overpass to FM 2305, and construction of interchanges at Wendland Road and SH 36/SH 53. The total project cost is currently budgeted at $ 51,719,886. The Department will fund $ 20,000,000 with Category 12 funds to be reimbursed to the City for eligible construction expenditures. These payments will be made prior to the Department’s pass-through reimbursements and be made at the time of construction. The maximum amount to be paid in annual installments under the pass-through reimbursements will begin after construction is completed and shall not exceed $ 16,555,000. Under no circumstances will the annual payment be less than $ 752,500 over 20 years or more than $ 1,505,000 over 10 years. The City’s share of the project of $ 16,686,208 plus financing costs will be funded by Pass-Through Agreement Revenue and Limited Tax Bonds in order to fund the amount needed. The bonds to fund the construction were sold on May 24, 2012. Other funding sources that are included in the City’s share include currently issued and available Certificate of Obligation funds, Utility Revenue bonds, and Reinvestment Zone No. 1 funds. On May 24, 2012, the City authorized a construction contract with James Construction Group, LLC in an amount not to exceed $ 39,883,619 for the construction of this project. Change orders in the amount of $ 381,863 have brought the total construction contract to $ 40,265,482. Construction of the project is substantially complete. Texas Department of Transportation confirmed the substantial completion date effective February 18, 2015. That date will be considered the anniversary date for annual repayment

109

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) A.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

Future Agreements (Continued) as outline in the agreement. The annual payments shall be paid within sixty days of the anniversary date. B.

RISK MANAGEMENT

The City is a member of the Texas Municipal League’s Intergovernmental Risk Pool (“Pool”). The Pool was created for the purpose of providing coverage against risks which are inherent in operating a political subdivision. The City pays annual premiums to the Pool for liability, property and workers’ compensation coverage. The City’s agreement with the Pool provides that the Pool will be selfsustaining through member premiums and will provide through commercial companies reinsurance contracts. The Pool agrees to handle all liability, property and workers’ compensation claims and provide any defense as is necessary. The Pool makes available to the City loss control services to assist the City in following a plan of loss control that may result in reduced losses. The City agrees that it will cooperate in instituting any and all reasonable loss control recommendations made by the Pool. The City also carries commercial insurance on all other risks of loss including employee health and accident insurance. The City has experienced no significant reductions in coverage through the Pool over the past year. There have been no insurance settlements exceeding Pool coverage for any of the past three years. C.

SELF-FUNDED HEALTH INSURANCE

The City is self-insured for medical claims. The self-insurance program is maintained in the SelfFunded Health Insurance Internal Service Fund. This program provides health benefit coverage in accordance with a pre-approved plan that establishes coverage limits per employee per year with an unlimited lifetime maximum per employee. The City purchases commercial insurance for claims in excess of a contractual City liability limit which is $ 125,000 per member. Additionally, commercial insurance covers claims in excess of an aggregate amount for the City up to 120% of the expected medical claims per plan year. Settled claims have not exceeded the commercial coverage during the year. The liability is estimated based upon claims settled within the next three months. Fiscal year 2011 was the first year of the plan. Effective October 1, 2013, the City elected to terminate the selfinsurance program and offer a fully insured plan to its employees. This is the final year of reporting for this fund. An analysis of claims activity is presented below: Claims and Plan Year

Beginning

Changes in

Actual Claims

Balance

Ended

Liability

Estimates

Payments

at Year-End

9/30/2013

291,234

3,007,048

2,950,942

347,340

9/30/2014

347,340

9/30/2015

110

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) D.

TAX ABATEMENTS

The City has entered into contractual agreements with property owners (or lessee's) in which the City has agreed to reduce the amount of ad valorem taxes payable on certain improvements constructed after the date the agreement was reached. The property owner, in return for the abatement, contractually agreed to construct and maintain certain identifiable improvements within a definite period or repay the abated taxes if the improvements are not maintained. The following is a list of property owners (or lessee's) with which the City has entered into tax abatement agreements. Date of Abatement Agreement

Effective Tax Year

07/06

Jan-07

McLane Group, LP

08/09

Jan-10

Texquest Investments LLC

02/09

Jan-11

H.E. Butt Grocery

09/10

Jan-11

Akzo Nobel Paints LLC - Liquid Nails Division

01/11

Jan-12

Fikes Wholesale, Inc.

05/11

Jan-15

Panda Temple Power, LLC

06/11

Jan-12

LJT Texas Realty, Inc.

Firm

2015 Abated Value

Term of Abatement

Abatement Percentage

$ 1,115,317

10 years

10% to 100%

FY 2008

551,569

5 years

100%

FY 2011

47,469,336

10 years

100%

FY 2012

2,794,669

5 years

50%

FY 2012

3,645,933

5 years

100%

FY 2013

10 years

50%

TBD

1,054,342

5 years

50%

FY 2013

First Yr of Abatement

06/11

Jan-12

Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc. {Pactiv Corporation}

1,870,481

5 years

80%

FY 2013

01/12

Jan-13

Sparetime Entertainment, LLC

3,602,251

5 years

100%

FY 2014

10/12

TBD

Don-Nan Pump & Supply Company

5 years

50%

TBD

12/12

Jan-16

Panda Temple Power II, LLC

10 years

12% to 65%

TBD

05/13

TBD

Buc-ee's, LTD

10 years

50%

TBD

02/14

TBD

Thomas Biodiesel, LLC

10 years

50% to 100%

TBD

03/14

TBD

Wilsonart LLC

10 years

20% to 80%

TBD

12/14

TBD

DanHill Fulfillment Center

5 years

50%

TBD

12/14

TBD

Block 015 Doering, LLC

10 years

50% to 100%

TBD

12/14

TBD

Block 015 Arcadia, LLC

10 years

50% to 100%

TBD

During fiscal year 2015, the total amount of abated property value was $ 62,103,898. Based on the city tax rate of $ 0.5864 per $ 100 of value, the foregone tax levy due to abatement agreements was $ 364,177. E.

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

(1)

Retirement Plans

The City participates in two retirement plans. The Texas Municipal Retirement System covered 638 employees as of December 31, 2014. The Temple Firefighterâ€™s Relief and Retirement Fund covered 119 employees as of September 30, 2015. The Texas Municipal Retirement System Plan Description The City participates as one of 860 plans in the nontraditional, joint contributory, hybrid defined benefit pension plan administered by the Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS). TMRS is an agency 111

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) E.

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (Continued)

(1)

Retirement Plans (Continued)

The Texas Municipal Retirement System (Continued) Plan Description (Continued) created by the State of Texas and administered in accordance with the TMRS Act, Subtitle G, Title 8, Texas Government Code (the TMRS Act) as an agent multiple-employer retirement system for municipal employees in the State of Texas. The TMRS Act places the general administration and management of the System with a six-member Board of Trustees. Although the Governor, with the advice and consent of the Senate, appoints the Board, TMRS is not fiscally dependent on the State of Texas. TMRS’s defined benefit pension plan is a tax-qualified plan under Section 401 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code. TMRS issues a publicly available comprehensive annual financial report (CAFR) that can be obtained at www.tmrs.com. All eligible employees of the city are required to participate in TMRS. Benefits Provided TMRS provides retirement, disability, and death benefits. Benefit provisions are adopted by the governing body of the City, within the options available in the state statutes governing TMRS. At retirement, the benefit is calculated as if the sum of the employee’s contributions, with interest, and the city-financed monetary credits with interest were used to purchase an annuity. Members may choose to receive their retirement benefit in one of seven actuarially equivalent payments options. Members may also choose to receive a portion of their benefit as a Partial Lump Sum Distribution in an amount equal to 12, 24, or 36 monthly payments, which cannot exceed 75% of the member’s deposits and interest. Beginning in 1992, the City granted an annually repeating (automatic) basis a monetary credit referred to as an updated service credit (USC) which is a theoretical amount which takes into account salary increases or plan improvements. If at any time during their career an employee earns a USC, this amount remains in their account earning interest at 5% until retirement. At retirement, the benefit is calculated as if the sum of the employee's accumulated contributions with interest and the employer match plus employer-financed monetary credits, such as USC, with interest were used to purchase an annuity. Additionally, initiated in 1992, the City provided on an annually repeating (automatic) basis cost of living adjustments (COLA) for retirees equal to a percentage of the change in the consumer price index (CPI).

112

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) E.

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (Continued)

(1)

Retirement Plans (Continued)

The Texas Municipal Retirement System (Continued) Benefits Provided (Continued) A summary of plan provisions for the City are as follows: Employee deposit rate Matching ratio (City to employee) Years required for vesting Service retirement eligibility

7% 2 to 1 5 20 years at any age, 5 years at age 60 and above 100% Repeating, Transfers 70% of CPI Repeating

Updated Service Credit Annuity Increase to retirees The City does not participate in Social Security. Employees Covered by Benefit Terms â€“

At the December 31, 2014 valuation and measurement date, the following employees were covered by the benefit terms: Retirees or beneficiaries currently receiving benefits Inactive employees entitled to but not yet receiving benefits Active employees

347 303 638 1,288

Contributions The contribution rates for employees in TMRS are either 5%, 6%, or 7% of employee gross earnings, and the City matching percentages are either 100%, 150%, or 200%, both as adopted by the governing body of the City. Under the state law governing TMRS, the contribution rate for each city is determined annually by the consulting actuary, using the Entry Age Normal (EAN) actuarial cost method. The actuarially determined rate is the estimated amount necessary to finance the cost of benefits earned by employees during the year, with an additional amount to finance any unfunded accrued liability. Employees for the City of Temple were required to contribute 7% of their annual gross earnings during the fiscal year. For fiscal year 2015, the City made required contributions of 17.50% for the months in 2014 and required contributions of 16.73% for the months in 2015. The Cityâ€™s contributions for the year ended September 30, 2015, were $ 4,981,397, and were equal to the required contributions.

113

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) E.

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (Continued)

(1)

Retirement Plans (Continued)

The Texas Municipal Retirement System (Continued) Net Pension Liability The City’s Net Pension Liability (NPL) was measured as of December 31, 2014, and the Total Pension Liability (TPL) used to calculate the Net Pension Liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of that date. Actuarial Assumptions – The Total Pension Liability in the December 31, 2014 actuarial valuation was determined using the following actuarial assumptions: Inflation Overall payroll growth Investment rate of return

3.0% per year 3.0% per year 7.0%, net of pension plan investment expense, including inflation

Salary increases were based on a service-related table. Mortality rates for active members, retirees, and beneficiaries were based on the gender-distinct RP2000 Combined Healthy Mortality Table, with male rates multiplied by 109% and female rates multiplied by 103%. The rates are projected on a fully generational basis by scale BB to account for future mortality improvements. For disabled annuitants, the gender-distinct RP2000 Disabled Retiree Mortality Table is used, with slight adjustments. Actuarial assumptions used in the December 31, 2014, valuation were based on the results of actuarial experience studies. This experience study was for the period January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2009, first used in the December 31, 2010 valuation. Healthy post-retirement mortality rates and annuity purchase rates were updated based on a Mortality Experience Investigation Study covering 2009 through 2011, and dated December 31, 2013. These assumptions were first used in the December 31, 2013 valuation, along with a change to the Entry Age Normal (EAN) actuarial cost method. Assumptions are reviewed annually. No additional changes were made for the 2014 valuation. The long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments is 7.0%. The pension plan’s policy in regard to the allocation of invested assets is established and may be amended by the TMRS Board of Trustees. Plan assets are managed on a total return basis with an emphasis on both capital appreciation as well as the production of income, in order to satisfy the short-term and long-term funding needs of TMRS. The long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was determined using a buildingblock method in which best estimate ranges of expected future real rates of return (expected returns, net of pension plan investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset class. These ranges are combined to produce the long-term expected rate of return by weighting the expected future real rates of return by the target asset allocation percentage and by adding expected inflation. The target allocation and best estimates of arithmetic real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the following table: 114

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) E.

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (Continued)

(1)

Retirement Plans (Continued)

The Texas Municipal Retirement System (Continued) Net Pension Liability (Continued) Actuarial Assumptions (Continued) –

Asset Class Domestic equity International equity Core fixed income Non-core fixed income Real return Real estate Absolute return Private equity Total

Target Allocation 17.5% 17.5% 30.0% 10.0% 5.0% 10.0% 5.0% 5.0% 100.0%

Long-Term Expected Real Rate of Return (Arithmetic) 4.80% 6.05% 1.50% 3.50% 1.75% 5.25% 4.25% 8.50%

Discount Rate – The discount rate used to measure the Total Pension Liability was 7.0%. The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that employee contributions will remain at the current 7% and employer contributions will be made at the rates specified in statute. Based on that assumption, the pension plan’s Fiduciary Net Position was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of current plan members. Therefore, the long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the Total Pension Liability.

115

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) E.

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (Continued)

(1)

Retirement Plans (Continued)

The Texas Municipal Retirement System (Continued) Net Pension Liability (Continued) Changes in the Net Pension Liability -

Total Pension Liability (a) Balance at December 31, 2013 $ 158,609,168 Changes for the year: Service cost 4,177,238 Interest 11,004,160 Change of benefit terms Difference between expected and actual experience (1,874,758) Changes of assumptions Contributions - employer Contributions - employee Net investment income Benefit payments, including refunds employee contributions (6,991,011) Administrative expense Other changes Net changes 6,315,629 Balance at December 31, 2014 $ 164,924,797

Increase (Decrease) Plan Fiduciary Net Position (b)

Net Pension Liability (a) - (b)

$ 134,928,884

$ 23,680,284

4,177,238 11,004,160 -

4,687,061 1,874,825 7,718,713 (6,991,011) (80,587) (6,626) 7,202,375 $ 142,131,259

(1,874,758) (4,687,061) (1,874,825) (7,718,713) 80,587 6,626 (886,746) $ 22,793,538

Sensitivity of the Net Pension Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate – The following presents the net pension liability of the City, calculated using the discount rate of 7.0%, as well as what the City’s net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1-percentage-point lower (6.0%) or 1-percentage-point higher (8.0%) than the current rate:

City’s net pension liability

1% Decrease in Discount Rate (6.0%)

Current Discount Rate (7.0%)

1% Increase in Discount Rate (8.0%)

$ 46,072,699

$ 22,793,538

$ 3,712,310

116

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) E.

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (Continued)

(1)

Retirement Plans (Continued)

The Texas Municipal Retirement System (Continued) Net Pension Liability (Continued) Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position – Detailed information about the pension plan’s Fiduciary Net Position is available in a separately issued TMRS financial report. That report may be obtained on the Internet at www.tmrs.com. Pension Expense and Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions For the year ended September 30, 2015, the City recognized pension expense of $ 3,865,539. At September 30, 2015, the City reported deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions from the following sources:

Differences between actual assumptions and actual experience Changes in actuarial assumptions used Differences between projected and actual investment earnings Contributions subsequent toto the Contributions subsequent the measurement date Total

Deferred Outflows of Resources

Deferred Inflows of Resources

1,381,047 3,702,834 5,083,881

1,446,271 -

1,446,271

Deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting from contributions subsequent to the measurement date of $ 3,702,834 will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability for the measurement year ending December 31, 2015 (i.e. recognized in the City’s financial statements September 30, 2016). Other amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows: Year Ended December 31 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total

$ (83,225) (83,225) (83,225) 184,451 $ (65,224)

117

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) E.

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (Continued)

(1)

Retirement Plans (Continued)

Temple Firefighters’ Relief and Retirement Fund Plan Description The City contributes to the retirement plan for firefighters in the Temple Fire Department known as the Temple Firefighter’s Relief and Retirement Fund (the Fund). The Fund is a single employer, contributory, defined benefit plan. The benefit provisions of the Fund are authorized by the Texas Local Fire Fighters’ Retirement Act (TLFFRA). TLFFRA provides the authority and procedure to amend benefit provisions. The plan is administered by the Board of Trustees of the Temple Firefighter’s Relief and Retirement Fund. The City does not have access to nor can it utilize assets within the retirement plan trust. The Fund issues a stand-alone report pursuant to GASB Statement No. 67, which may be obtained by writing the Temple Firefighter’s Relief and Retirement Fund at 3615 S. 31st Street, Temple, Texas 76504. See that report for all information about the plan fiduciary net position. Benefits Provided Firefighters in the Temple Fire Department are covered by the Temple Firefighter’s Relief and Retirement Fund which provides service retirement, death, disability, and withdrawal benefits. These benefits fully vest after 20 years of credited service. Firefighters may retire at age 50 with 20 years of service. A partially vested benefit is provided for firefighters who terminate employment with at least 10 but less than 20 years of service. If a terminated firefighter has a partially vested benefit, he may retire starting on the date he would have both completed 20 years of service if he had remained a Temple firefighter and attained age 50. As of the September 30, 2014 actuarial valuation date, the plan effective March 1, 2013 provided a monthly normal service retirement benefit, payable in a Joint and Two-Thirds to Spouse form of annuity, equal to 65.75% of Highest Five Year Average Monthly Salary plus $93.00 per month for each year of service in excess of 20. A retiring firefighter who is at least age 53 with at least 23 years of service has the option to elect the Deferred Retirement Option Plan (DROP) which will provide a lump sum benefit and a reduced monthly benefit. The reduced monthly benefit is based on the service and Highest Five Year Average Monthly Salary as if he had terminated employment on his selected DROP benefit calculation date, which is no earlier than the later of the date he meets the age 53 and 23 years of service requirements and the date two years prior to the date he actually retires. Upon retirement, the member will receive, in addition to his monthly retirement benefit, a lump sum equal to the sum of (1) the amount of monthly contributions the member has made to the Fund after the DROP benefit calculation date plus (2) the total of the monthly retirement benefits the member would have received between the DROP benefit calculation date and the date he retired under the plan. There are no account balances. The lump sum is calculated at the time of retirement and distributed as soon as administratively possible. There is no provision for automatic postretirement benefit increases. The Fund has the authority to provide, and has periodically in the past provided, ad hoc postretirement benefit increases.

118

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) E.

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (Continued)

(1)

Retirement Plans (Continued)

Temple Firefighters’ Relief and Retirement Fund (Continued) Benefits Provided (Continued) Members Covered by the Fund – In the September 30, 2014 actuarial valuation, the following numbers of members were covered by the Fund: Retirees and beneficiaries currently receiving benefits Inactive employees entitled to but not yet receiving benefits Active employees

67 1 119 187

Funding Policy The contribution provisions of the Fund are authorized by TLFFRA. TLFFRA provides the authority and procedure to change the amount of contributions determined as a percentage of pay by each firefighter and a percentage of payroll by the City. The funding policy of the Temple Firefighter’s Relief and Retirement Fund requires contributions equal to 15% of pay by the firefighters, the rate elected by the firefighters according to TLFFRA. The City currently contributes according to a city ordinance either the same percentage of payroll that the City contributes to the Texas Municipal Retirement System for other employees or the firefighter contribution rate (15% of payroll) if lesser. The City has also agreed to contribute an additional 0.24% of payroll. The actuarial valuation includes the assumption that the City contribution rate will be 15.24% over the UAAL amortization period. The costs of administering the plan are paid from the Fund assets. Ultimately, the funding policy also depends upon the total return of the Fund’s assets, which varies from year to year. Investment policy decisions are established and maintained by the Board of Trustees. The Board selects and employs investment managers with the advice of their investment consultant who is completely independent of the investment managers. For the year ending September 30, 2014, the money-weighted rate of return on pension plan investments was 6.45%. This measurement of the investment performance is net of investment-related expenses, reflecting the effect of the timing of the contributions received and the benefits paid during the year. While the contribution requirements are not actuarially determined, state law requires that each change in plan benefits adopted by the Fund must first be approved by an eligible actuary, certifying that the contribution commitment by the firefighters and the assumed city contribution rate together provide an adequate contribution arrangement. Using the entry age actuarial cost method, the plan’s normal cost contribution rate is determined as a percentage of payroll. The excess of the total contribution rate over the normal cost contribution rate is used to amortize the plan’s unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL). The number of years needed to amortize the plan’s UAAL is actuarially determined using an open, level percentage of payroll method. 119

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) E.

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (Continued)

(1)

Retirement Plans (Continued)

Temple Firefighters’ Relief and Retirement Fund (Continued) Net Pension Liability The City’s net pension liability was measured as September 30, 2014, and the total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of September 30, 2014.

Total pension liability Plan fiduciary net position City’s net pension liability

$ 50,613,335 (39,633,562) $ 10,979,773

Plan fiduciary net position as a percentage of the total pension liability

78.3%

Actuarial Assumptions – The total pension liability in the September 30, 2014 actuarial valuation was determined using the following actuarial assumptions, applied to all periods included in the measurement: Inflation Salary increases Investment rate of return

3.75% 3.75%, plus promotion, step and longevity increases that vary by service 8.00%, net of pension plan investment expense, including inflation

Mortality rates were based on the RP-2000 Combined Healthy Mortality Tables for males and for females (sex distinct) projected to 2024 by scale AA. The long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments is reviewed for each biennial actuarial valuation and was determined using a building-block method in which expected future net real rates of return (expected returns, net of pension plan investment expense and inflation) are developed for each major asset class. These components are combined to produce the long-term expected rate of return by weighting the expected future net real rates of return by the target asset allocation percentage (currently resulting in 4.6%) and by adding expected inflation (3.75%). In addition, the final 8.00% assumption was selected by “rounding down” and thereby reflects a reduction of 0.35% for adverse deviation. The target allocation and expected arithmetic net real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the following table:

120

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) E.

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (Continued)

(1)

Retirement Plans (Continued)

Temple Firefighters’ Relief and Retirement Fund (Continued) Net Pension Liability (Continued) Actuarial Assumptions (Continued) –

Asset Class Large Cap Domestic Equity Small/Mid Cap Domestic Equity International Equity Real Estate Commodities Private Equity Hedge Fund Fixed Income Cash Total

Target Allocation

Long-Term Expected Real Rate of Return (Arithmetic)

20.0%

5.90%

10.0% 24.0% 5.0% 7.5% 5.0% 5.0% 22.5% 1.0% 100.0%

6.00% 6.30% 3.90% 3.70% 7.60% 2.70% 1.40% 0.10%

Weighted Average

4.60%

Discount Rate – The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 8%. No projection of cash flows was used to determine the discount rate because the September 30, 2014 actuarial valuation showed that expected contributions would pay the normal cost and amortize the unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) in twenty three years. That UAAL was based on an actuarial value of assets that was $ 576,913 less than the plan fiduciary net position as of September 30, 2014. Because of the twenty three year amortization period of the UAAL with the lower value of assets, the pension plan’s fiduciary net position is expected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of current active and inactive members. Therefore, the long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments of 8% was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments as the discount rate to determine the total pension liability.

121

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) E.

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (Continued)

(1)

Retirement Plans (Continued)

Temple Firefighters’ Relief and Retirement Fund (Continued) Net Pension Liability (Continued) Sensitivity of the Net Pension Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate – The following presents the net pension liability of the City of Temple, calculated using the discount rate of 8%, as well as what the City’s net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1-percentage-point lower (7%) or 1-percentage-point higher (9%) than the current rate:

City’s net pension liability

1% Decrease in Discount Rate (7.0%)

Current Discount Rate (8.0%)

1% Increase in Discount Rate (9.0%)

$ 16,551,458

$ 10,979,773

$ 6,247,380

Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position – The plan fiduciary net position reported above is the same as reported by the Fund. Detailed information about the plan fiduciary net position is available in the Fund’s separately issued audited financial statements, which are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Revenues are recorded when earned, and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of the related cash flows. Investments are reported at fair value, the price that would be recognized to sell an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

122

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) E.

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (Continued)

(1)

Retirement Plans (Continued)

Temple Firefighters’ Relief and Retirement Fund (Continued) Net Pension Liability (Continued) Changes in the Net Pension Liability –

Total Pension Liability (a) Balance at September 30, 2013 $ 48,109,317 Changes for the year: Service cost 1,282,932 Interest 3,846,369 Change of benefit terms Difference between expected and actual experience Changes of assumptions Contributions - employer Contributions - employee Net investment income Benefit payments, including refunds of employee contributions (2,625,283) Administrative expense Other changes Net changes 2,504,018 Balance at September 30, 2014 $ 50,613,335

123

Increase (Decrease) Plan Fiduciary Net Position (b)

Net Pension Liability (a) - (b)

$ 37,703,887

$ 10,405,430

1,282,932 3,846,369 -

1,111,042 1,096,265 2,415,802 (2,625,283) (68,151) 1,929,675 $ 39,633,562

(1,111,042) (1,096,265) (2,415,802) 68,151 574,343 $ 10,979,773

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) E.

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (Continued)

(1)

Retirement Plans (Continued)

Temple Firefighters’ Relief and Retirement Fund (Continued) Pension Expense and Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions For the year ended September 30, 2015, the City’s GASB 68 pension expense was $ 1,220,534. Amounts recognized in the fiscal year represent changes between the current and prior measurement dates. Components of Pension Expense for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2015 –

Service cost Interest Firefighter contributions Projected earnings on pension plan investments Amortization of differences between projected and actual earnings on plan investments Amortization of changes of assumptions Amortization of differences between expected and actual experience Pension plan administrative expenses Other Total pension expense

$ 1,282,932 3,846,369 (1,096,265) (2,996,866) 116,213 68,151 $ 1,220,534

Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflows of Resources to be Recognized in Pension Expense in Future Years – Deferred Outflows Deferred Inflows of Resources of Resources

Differences between actual assumptions and actual experience Changes in actuarial assumptions used Differences between projected and actual investment earnings Contributions subsequent to the Contributions subsequent to the measurement date Total

124

464,851

1,222,757 1,687,608

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) E.

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (Continued)

(1)

Retirement Plans (Continued)

Temple Firefighters’ Relief and Retirement Fund (Continued) Pension Expense and Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions (Continued) Deferred Outflows of Resources and Deferred Inflows of Resources to be Recognized in Pension Expense in Future Years (Continued) – Amounts reported as deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized in pension expense as follows:

Measurement Year Ended September 30 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total

$ 116,213 116,213 116,213 116,212 $ 464,851

The total of the contributions by the City to the Fund contributed subsequent to the measurement date of the net pension liability, September 30, 2014, through September 30, 2015 is a deferred outflow of resources that will be recognized as a reduction in the net pension liability in the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016.

125

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) E.

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (Continued)

(2)

Supplemental Death Benefits Fund

The City also participates in the cost sharing multiple-employer defined benefit group-term life insurance plan operated by Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) known as the Supplemental Death Benefits Fund (SDBF). The City elected, by ordinance, to provide group-term life insurance coverage to both current and retired employees. The City may terminate coverage under and discontinue participation in the SDBF by adopting an ordinance before November 1, of any year to be effective the following January 1. The death benefit for active employees provides a lump-sum payment approximately equal to the employee’s annual salary (calculated based on the employee’s actual earnings, for the 12-month period preceding the month of death). Retired employees are insured for $ 7,500; this coverage is an “other postemployment benefit” or OPEB. Contributions The City contributes to the SDBF at a contractually required rate as determined by an annual actuarial valuation. The rate is equal to the cost of providing one-year term life insurance. The funding policy for the SDBF program is to assure that adequate resources are available to meet all death benefit payments for the upcoming year; the intent is not to pre-fund retiree term life insurance during employee’s entire careers. The City’s contributions to the TMRS SBDF for the fiscal years ended 2015, 2014, and 2013 were $ 20,607, $ 18,649, and $ 15,460, respectively, which equaled the required contributions each year. A summary of the annual required contributions is as follows: Texas Municipal Retirement System - Supplemental Death Benefits Fund

Plan Year Ended 9/30/2013 9/30/2014 9/30/2015

Total Annual Contribution as a Percentage of Payroll

Required Annual Contribution as a Percentage of Payroll

0.06% 0.07% 0.07%

126

Annual Required Contribution (ARC) $

15,460 18,649 20,607

Percentage of Required Contribution Contributed 100% 100% 100%

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) E.

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (Continued)

(3)

Deferred Compensation Fund

The City offers its employees a deferred compensation plan created in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 457. The Plan is administered by one trustee; the International City Management Association Retirement Corporation (ICMA-RC). In 1998, the City implemented the requirements of GASB Statement No. 32, “Accounting and Reporting for Internal Revenue Code Section 457 Deferred Compensation Plans”. In accordance with this statement and recent tax law changes, the City has amended their trust agreement which establishes that all assets and income of the trust are for the exclusive benefit of eligible employees and their beneficiaries. Due to the implementation of these changes, the City does not have any fiduciary responsibility or administrative duties relating to the deferred compensation plan other than remitting employees’ contributions to the trustee. Accordingly, the City has not presented the assets and income from the plan in these Financial Statements. Deferred compensation investments are held by an outside trustee. Plan investments are chosen by the individual (employee) participant and include mutual funds whose focus is on stocks, bonds, treasury securities, money market-type investments or a combination of these. The plan, available to all permanent City employees, permits them to defer until future years up to 100% of annual gross earnings not to exceed $ 17,500. The deferred compensation is not available to employees until termination, retirement, death, or unforeseeable emergency. F.

OTHER POST- EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS

Plan Description In addition to providing pension benefits, the City provided certain other post-employment benefits to its retirees. Other post-employment benefits include health and dental insurances for the retiree and the retiree's family. The benefits described below represent the benefits currently in place and projected to be in place in the future. However, the projected future benefits do not explicitly incorporate the potential effects of legal or contractual funding limitations on the pattern of cost sharing between the employer and plan members in the future. These benefits are part of a single-employer benefit OPEB plan. The plan does not issue a publicly available financial report. Opportunity to Purchase Health and/or Dental Insurance An employee leaving the employment of the City, who is eligible to receive retirement benefits from a municipal retirement plan, is entitled to purchase continued health and/or dental benefits for the employee and the employee’s dependents (if covered by the City’s plan at the time of separation) from the City unless the employee is eligible, or becomes eligible at a later date, for group health and/or dental benefits through another employer. To avail themselves of this opportunity to purchase health and/or dental benefits through the City, the employee must notify the City of his or her intent to continue to purchase health and/or dental benefit coverage no later than the date on which the person leaves employment with the City. The City will make coverage available to eligible retirees under the health care and/or dental coverage plan provided by the City to its employees or through a substitute Medicare Supplement Plan for over age 65 retirees for health insurance. A retired employee who elects to continue health and/or dental benefit coverage under this section prior to retirement, and who 127

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) F.

OTHER POST- EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (Continued)

subsequently enters employment with another employer who offers group health and/or benefits to its employees (regardless of whether or not the retired employee elects such coverage), is no longer eligible for coverage under this policy. A retired employee who elects to continue health and/or dental benefit coverage under this section prior to retirement, and who subsequently elects to discontinue such coverage, is no longer eligible for coverage under this policy. A retired employee who elects to continue coverage for any of the retired employee’s dependents, and who then subsequently elects to discontinue such coverage for any of his dependents, abandons his right to obtain future coverage for the dependent for whom coverage was discontinued. Contribution by City Towards Cost of Health and/or Dental Benefits for Certain Employees Employees who retire prior to May 1, 2007: a. The City will pay an amount to be determined each fiscal year by the City offered actuarially calculated, non-blended, standard option health and/or dental insurance premium toward the City offered plan selected by a retired employee, who: 1. was hired by the City prior to February 1, 2002; 2. is not eligible to receive Medicare benefits; 3. had not less than 10 years of continuous service with the City at the time of his or her retirement; 4. notifies the City of his or her intent to continue health benefit and/or dental coverage with the City no later than the date on which he or she retires; and 5. is eligible and elects to receive a monthly retirement annuity from the Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) or the Temple Firefighter’s Relief and Pension Fund commencing within 60 days of his or her retirement from the City. b. The City will pay an amount to be determined each fiscal year of the City offered actuarially calculated, non-blended, standard option health and/or dental insurance premium toward the City offered plan selected by a retired employee, who: 1. was hired by the City after January 31, 2002; 2. is not eligible to receive Medicare benefits; 3. had not less than 25 years of continuous service with the City at the time of his or her retirement; 4. notifies the City of his or her intent to continue health and/or dental benefit coverage with the City no later than the date on which he or she retires; and 5. is eligible and elects to receive a monthly retirement annuity from the Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) or the Temple Firefighter’s Relief and Pension Fund commencing within 60 days of his or her retirement from the City.

128

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) F.

OTHER POST- EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (Continued)

Contribution by City Towards Cost of Health and/or Dental Benefits for Certain Employees (Continued) Employees who retire on or after May 1, 2007: a. The City will pay an amount to be determined each fiscal year of the City offered actuarially calculated, non-blended, standard option health and/or dental insurance premium of retired employees who: 1. had not less than 25 years of continuous service with the City of Temple at the time of his or her retirement; 2. is not eligible to receive Medicare benefits; 3. notifies the City of his or her intent to continue health and/or dental benefit coverage with the City no later than the date on which he or she retires; and 4. is eligible and elects to receive a monthly retirement annuity from the Texas Municipal Retirement System (TMRS) or the Temple Firefighters’ Relief and Pension Fund commencing within 60 days of his or her retirement from the City. b. Employees who retire with less than 25 years of continuous service with the City of Temple will be required to pay 100% of the actuarially calculated, non-blended rate for retirees. c. Employees who leave the employment of the City with retirement eligibility, but less than 25 years of continuous service at the City of Temple, may purchase health and/or dental benefit coverage for themselves or their dependents through COBRA continuation, subject to the terms contained herein, but are responsible for 100% of the cost of such coverage. Provisions Regarding Medicare for Retirees Over the Age of 65 a. An individual who retires from the City of Temple, and who informed the City not later than their date of retirement, upon attaining age 65 is no longer eligible for benefits under the City-sponsored plan for employees. Upon attaining age 65, such retiree is eligible to enroll in the Medicare Supplement Plan adopted by the City as a substitute for coverage under the Plan offered to employees. If a retiree attains age 65, and had coverage for a dependent that has not attained age 65, the dependent will be eligible to continue coverage, at 100% the retiree’s cost, under the City Plan for employees until attaining age 65. The dependent, upon attaining age 65, will be eligible to enroll in the substitute Medicare Supplement adopted by the City at 100% the retiree’s cost. The City will pay an amount to be determined each fiscal year for retirees selecting one of the City adopted substitute Medicare Supplement Plans not to exceed 50% of the City adopted standard option substitute Medicare Supplement for retirees who had at least 25 years of continuous service with the City of Temple.

129

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) F.

OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (Continued)

Provisions Regarding Medicare for Retirees Over the Age of 65 (Continued) b. A retiree who retired from the City prior to 1998, is over 68 years old, and who is not eligible to receive Medicare benefits, will not be required to enroll in the City-adopted substitute Medicare Supplement program. The City will continue to pay an amount to be determined each fiscal year of the actuarially calculated, non-blended, standard option premium of health insurance for these retirees. c. The retiree will be responsible for 100% of the premium for any elected dependent coverage. d. To retain health and/or dental insurance benefits through the City, the retiree must pay the premium for the retiree coverage and any dependent coverage within 45 days of the date on which any premium is due. The City reserves the right to withdraw the eligibility to purchase health and/or dental insurance benefits through the City if a retiree fails to make a premium payment as required. Dependents not on the employee’s health and/or dental insurance at the time of the employee’s retirement cannot be added at a later date. Once a covered individual (including the retiree) elects to drop coverage, or coverage is dropped due to lack of payment, they are no longer eligible to be enrolled in the City’s health plan or substitute Medicare Supplement plan. The City is under no obligation, statutory or otherwise to offer other post-employment benefits or pay any portion of the cost of other post-employment benefits to any retirees. Allocation of city funds to pay other post-employment benefits or to make other post-employment benefits available is determined on an annual basis by the City Council as part of the budget approval process. Expenditures for other post-employment benefits are recognized on a pay-as-you-go basis. The City recognizes the cost of providing these benefits as payroll expenditures within the Human Resources Department. The cost of providing these benefits for the year ended September 30, 2015 for one hundred ten (110) retirees was $ 147,138. In the fiscal year 2009, the City implemented GASB Statement No. 45. The following liability is recognized in the government-wide financial statements as of September 30, 2015. The schedule of funding progress, presented as required supplementary information following the notes to the financial statements, presents multiyear trend information that shows whether the actuarial value of the plan assets held in an irrevocable trust is increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial accrued liabilities for benefits.

130

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) F.

OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (Continued)

Annual Other Post-Employment (OPEB) Cost and Net OPEB Obligation The annual OPEB cost associated with the Cityâ€™s retiree benefits for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, is as follows. Governmental Annual required contribution

417,952

Interest on prior year net OPEB obligation

Proprietary $

Total

68,039

485,991

98,949

24,729

123,678

Adjustment to ARC

(91,675)

(22,911)

(114,586)

Annual OPEB cost

425,226

69,857

495,083

Contributions made

(259,760)

Estimated increase in net OPEB obligation

165,466

Net OPEB obligation - beginning of year Estimated net OPEB obligation - end of year

2,198,867 2,364,333

(259,760)

69,857 $

549,532 619,389

235,323 $

2,748,399 2,983,722

Schedule of Employer Contributions Other Post-Employment Benefits Annual

Percentage

Assumed

OPEB

of Required

Net

Plan Year

Annual

Benefit Cost

Contribution

OPEB

Ended

Contribution

(ABC)

Contributed

Obligation

9/30/2013 $

218,082

598,798

36% $

2,527,961

9/30/2014

259,760

480,198

54%

2,748,399

9/30/2015

259,760

495,083

52%

2,983,722

Schedule of Funding Progess Other Post-Employment Benefits Unfunded Actuarial

Actuarial

UAAL as a

Actuarial

Accrued

Percentage

Accrued

Annual

Percentage

Valuation

Value

Liability (AAL)

Funded

Liability

Covered

of Payroll

Date

for Assets

Unit Credit

(1)/(2)

(UAAL)

Payroll

(4)/(5)

9/30/2010 $

7,402,254

0.0% $

7,402,254

$ 30,223,689

24.5%

9/30/2012

7,406,228

0.0%

7,406,228

32,051,174

23.1%

9/30/2014

5,727,264

0.0%

5,727,264

33,950,142

16.9%

131

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) F.

OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (Continued)

Annual Other Post-Employment (OPEB) Cost and Net OPEB Obligation (Continued) Actuarial valuations of an ongoing plan involve estimates of the value of reported amounts and assumptions about the probability of occurrence of events far into the future. Examples include assumptions about future employment, mortality, and the health care cost trend. Amounts determined regarding the funded status of the plan and annual required contributions of the employer are subject to continual revision as actual results are compared with past expectations and new estimates are made about the future. The schedule of funding progress, presented as required supplementary information following the notes to the financial statements, presents multiyear trend information that shows whether the actuarial value of the plan is increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial accrued liabilities for benefits. Projections of benefits for financial reporting purposes are based on the substantive plan (the plan as understood by the employer and plan members) and include the types of benefits provided at the time of each valuation and the historical pattern of sharing benefit costs between the employer and plan members to that point. The actuarial methods and assumptions used include techniques that are designed to reduce short-term volatility in actuarial accrued liabilities and actuarial value of assets, consistent with the long-term perspective of the calculations. The actuarial cost method and significant assumptions underlying the actuarial calculation are as follows: Summary of Actuarial Valuations Actuarial Valuation Date Actuarial Cost Method Amortization Method Amortization Period Asset Valuation Method Investment Rate of Return Inflation Rate Payroll Growth Health Care Cost Trend Rate

9/30/2010 Projected Unit Credit Level as a percentage employee payroll 30 years, open Market Value, if any 4.50% 3.00% 3.00% Initial rate of 9% declining to an ultimate rate of 4.50% after 9 years

132

9/30/2012 Projected Unit Credit Level as a percentage employee payroll 30 years, open Market Value, if any 4.50% 3.00% 3.00% Initial rate of 8.5% declining to an ultimate rate of 4.50% after 8 years

9/30/2014 Projected Unit Credit Level as a percentage employee payroll 30 years, open Market Value, if any 4.50% 3.00% 3.00% Initial rate of 7.5% declining to an ultimate rate of 4.50% after 12 years

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED) September 30, 2015 IV.

OTHER INFORMATION (Continued) G.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Pursuant to TMRS policy of conducting experience studies every four years, the TMRS Board at their July 31, 2015 meeting determined that they would be changing certain actuarial assumptions including reducing the long term expected rate of return from the current 7% to 6.75% and changing the inflation assumption from 3% to 2.5%. Reduction of expected investment return and related discount rate will increase projected pension liabilities. Reducing the inflation assumption reduces liabilities as future annuity levels and future cost of living adjustments are not projected to be a large as originally projected. While the actual impact on the Cityâ€™s valuation for December 31, 2015 is not known, the City does expect some downward pressure on its funded status and upward pressure on its 2017 actuarially determined contribution (ADC) due to this change. Accordingly, the City has included in its approved fiscal year 2016 budget to continue to fund pension contributions above the required ADC which will help smooth impacts of any increases in the required ADC for fiscal year 2017.

133

134

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Texas Municipal Retirement System Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios

Measurement Year 2014 Total pension liability: Service cost Interest Changes of benefit terms Difference between expected and actual experience Change in assumptions Benefit payments, including refunds of employee contributions Net change in total pension liability Total pension liability - beginning Total pension liability - ending (a) Plan fiduciary net position: Contributions - employer Contributions - employee Net investment income Benefit payments, including refunds of employee contributions Administrative expense Other Net change in plan fiduciary net position Plan fiduciary net position - beginning Plan fiduciary net position - ending (b) Net pension liability - ending (a) - (b) Plan fiduciary net position as a percentage of total pension liability Covered employee payroll Net pension liability as a percentage of covered employee payroll As of December 31, 2014

135

4,177,238 11,004,160 (1,874,758) -

$ $

(6,991,011) 6,315,629 158,609,168 164,924,797 4,687,061 1,874,825 7,718,713

(6,991,011) (80,587) (6,626) 7,202,375 134,928,884 142,131,259 22,793,538

86.18% 26,783,210 85.10%

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Texas Municipal Retirement System Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios (Continued) Fiscal Year 2015 Actuarially determined contribution Contribution in relation of the actuarially determined contribution Contribution deficiency (excess)

4,981,397

4,981,397 -

Covered employee payroll

29,438,972

Contributions as a percentage of covered employee payroll

16.92%

Notes to Schedule: Valuation Date: Actuarial determined contribution rates are calculated as of December 31st each year and become effective in January, 12 months and a day later. Methods and Assumptions Used to Determine Contribution Rates: Actuarial Cost Method Amortization Method Remaining Amortization Period Asset Valuation Method Inflation Salary Increases Investment Rate of Return Retirement Age

Mortality

Entry Age Normal Level Percentage of Payroll, Closed 25 years 10 Year smoothed market; 15% soft corridor 3.0% 3.50% to 12.00% including inflation 7.00% Experience-based table of rates that are specific to the City's plan of benefits. Last updated for the 2010 valuation pursuant to an experience study of the period 2005 â€“ 2009. RP2000 Combined Mortality Table with Blue Collar Adjustment with male rates multiplied by 109% and female rates multiplied by 103% and projected on a fully generational basis with scale BB.

Other Information: There were no benefit changes during the year.

136

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Temple Firefighterâ€™s Relief and Retirement Fund Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios

1,282,932 3,846,369 -

$ $

(2,625,283) 2,504,018 48,109,317 50,613,335 1,111,042 1,096,265 2,415,802

(2,625,283) (68,151) 1,929,675 37,703,887 39,633,562 10,979,773

78.31% 7,446,056 147.46%

As of September 30, 2014

137

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Temple Firefighterâ€™s Relief and Retirement Fund Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios (Continued)

Fiscal Year 2014

Fiscal Year 2015

Actuarially determined contribution Contribution in relation of the actuarially determined contribution Contribution deficiency (excess)

$ 1,111,042

$ 1,222,757

Covered employee payroll

$ 7,290,302

Contributions as a percentage of covered employee payroll

1,111,042 -

1,222,757 -

$ 8,038,339

15.24%

15.21%

Notes to Schedule: Valuation Date: Actuarial valuations are calculated as of September 30th every other year. Methods and Assumptions Used to Determine Contribution Rates: Actuarial Cost Method Amortization Method Remaining Amortization Period Asset Valuation Method Inflation Salary Increases Investment Rate of Return Mortality

Entry Age Level Percentage of Payroll, Open 23 years Market value smoothed by a five-year deferred recognition method with a 90%/110% corridor on market 3.75% 3.75% plus promotion, step, and longevity increases that average 1.89% per year over a 30-year career 8.00%, net of pension plan investment expense, including inflation RP-2000 Combined Healthy Lives Mortality Tables for males and for females projected to 2024 by scale AA.

Other Information: There were no benefit changes during the year.

138

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION SCHEDULE OF FUNDING PROGRESS (unaudited) Other Post-Employment Benefits

Actuarial Valuation Date 9/30/2010 9/30/2012 9/30/2014

Actuarial Accrued Liability (AAL) Unit Credit

Actuarial Value for Assets $

Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL)

Percentage Funded (1)/(2)

7,402,254 7,406,228 5,727,264

0.0% $ 0.0% 0.0%

7,402,254 7,406,228 5,727,264

Annual Covered Payroll $ 30,223,689 32,051,174 33,950,142

SCHEDULE OF EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS (unaudited) Other Post-Employment Benefits

Plan Year Ended

Annual OPEB Benefit Cost (ABC)

Assumed Annual Contribution

9/30/2013 $ 9/30/2014 9/30/2015

218,082 259,760 259,760

598,798 480,198 495,083

139

Percentage of Required Contribution Contributed 36% $ 54% 52%

Net OPEB Obligation 2,527,961 2,748,399 2,983,722

UAAL as a Percentage of Payroll (4)/(5) 24.5% 23.1% 16.9%

140

COMBINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Special Revenue Funds

Hotel/Motel Tax Fund – to account for the accumulation of resources from the hotel/motel tax assessment levied by the City. These monies are to be spent to promote the progress, development or growth of the City within the guidelines set forth on disposition of revenues collected under the authority of the Texas Hotel Occupancy Tax Act. Federal/State Grant Fund – to account for revenues received from award of federal and state grants. Such revenues are restricted to expenditures as specified in the applicable grant. Drainage Fund – to account for the levy and utilization of a municipal drainage fee. Revenues are restricted to expenditures for maintenance of the City’s drainage system.

141

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS September 30, 2015

Special Revenue

Hotel/ Motel

Federal/State Grant

Total Nonmajor Governmental Funds

Drainage

ASSETS Cash Investments Due from other governments Receivables, net Inventories Prepaid items Other assets - museum collection Total assets

4,600 1,341,051 159,700 14,800 4,325 18,561 $ 1,543,037

11,230 237,831 249,061

1,995,881 49,368 275 $ 2,045,524

149,676 23,410 75,975 249,061

4,600 3,348,162 237,831 209,068 14,800 4,600 18,561 3,837,622

LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES Liabilities: Vouchers and contracts payable Retainage payable Accrued payroll Vacation and sick leave payable Deposits Unearned revenues Total liabilities Fund Balances: Nonspendable: Inventory and prepaid items Restricted for: Museum Promotion of tourism Committed to: Drainage Total fund balances Total liabilities and fund balances

100,354 16,393 13,340 77,583 207,670

33,182 14,837 14,343 62,362

283,212 23,410 31,230 27,683 77,583 75,975 519,093

19,125

275

19,400

11,149 1,305,093

1,335,367 $ 1,543,037

249,061

1,982,887 1,983,162 $ 2,045,524

1,982,887 3,318,529 3,837,622

142

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS For the year ended September 30, 2015

Special Revenue

Hotel/ Motel Revenues: Taxes Intergovernmental Drainage fees Charges for services Interest and other Total revenues

$ 1,440,351 508,062 51,824 2,000,237

Expenditures: General government Public safety Highways and streets Health and welfare Culture and leisure services Airport Total expenditures

1,824,208 1,824,208

Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures

176,029

Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in - General Fund Transfers in - Capital Projects Fund Transfers in - Health Insurance Fund Total other financing sources (uses) Net change in fund balances Fund balances, beginning of year Fund balances, end of year

Federal/State Grant $

808,031 808,031

Drainage $

Total Nonmajor Governmental Funds

1,125,126 17,645 1,142,771

$ 1,440,351 808,031 1,125,126 508,062 69,469 3,951,039

83,132 61,825 83,353 102,069 380,293 161,884 872,556

952,798 952,798

83,132 61,825 1,036,151 102,069 2,204,501 161,884 3,649,562

(64,525)

189,973

301,477

174 174

49,450 15,075 64,525

174 174

49,450 15,075 348 64,873

176,203 1,159,164 $ 1,335,367

190,147 1,793,015 $ 1,983,162

366,350 2,952,179 $ 3,318,529

143

144

DISCRETELY PRESENTED COMPONENT UNIT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Reinvestment Zone No. 1

145

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS REINVESTMENT ZONE NO. 1 COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET September 30, 2015 and 2014 2015

2014

$ 9,646,528

$ 6,695,915

63,704 307,164 10,017,396

168,084 735,351 7,599,350

12,888,766 12,888,766

885,361 23,482,962 24,368,323

$ 22,906,162

$ 31,967,673

ASSETS Current assets: Investments Receivables (net of allowance for estimated uncollectible): Ad valorem taxes Accounts receivable Total current assets Restricted assets: Reserve for debt service Bond proceeds Total restricted assets Total assets LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES Current liabilities: Vouchers and contracts payable Retainage payable Unearned revenues Total current liabilities Liabilities from restricted assets: Vouchers and contracts payable Retainage payable Total liabilities from restricted assets Total liabilities

Fund Balance: Restricted for: Construction Committed to: Reinvestment Zone No. 1 Projects Total fund balance Total liabilities, deferred inflows and fund balances

146

938,193 220,038 63,704 1,221,935

299,831 168,084 467,915

137,867 38,779 176,646 1,398,581

136,315 136,315 604,230

12,712,120

23,346,647

8,795,461 21,507,581 $ 22,906,162

8,016,796 31,363,443 $ 31,967,673

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS REINVESTMENT ZONE NO. 1 SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For the year ended September 30, 2015 (With comparative amounts for the year ended September 30, 2014) 2015 Budgeted Amounts Original Final Revenues: Taxes Intergovernmental Licenses and permits Interest and other Total revenues Expenditures: General government Capital outlay Debt service: Principal retirement Interest and fiscal charges Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures

Fund balance, beginning of year Fund balance, end of year

2014

Actual

Variance with Final Budget

$ 4,834,938 36,000 50,000 4,920,938

$ 14,420,311 1,320,000 36,000 2,498,588 18,274,899

$ 14,586,939 350,000 61,730 1,683,433 16,682,102

597,065 445,428

945,649 42,429,019

485,464 21,455,254

460,185 20,973,765

496,465 2,422,207

2,655,000 1,942,246 5,639,739

2,655,000 1,942,246 47,971,914

2,655,000 1,942,246 26,537,964

21,433,950

2,555,000 2,006,174 7,479,846

(29,697,015)

(9,855,862)

19,841,153

(1,098,961)

(718,801)

31,363,443 $ 30,644,642

31,363,443 1,666,428

147

31,363,443 $ 21,507,581

166,628 (970,000) 25,730 (815,155) (1,592,797)

Actual

$ 19,841,153

5,529,970 51,720 799,195 6,380,885

32,462,404 $ 31,363,443

148

Schedules of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance â€“ Budget and Actual

149

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS DEBT SERVICE FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For the year ended September 30, 2015 (With comparative amounts for the year ended September 30, 2014) 2015

Budgeted Amounts Original Final Revenues: Taxes $ 8,462,200 Interest and other 495,000 Total revenues 8,957,200 Expenditures: Debt Service: Principal 5,775,000 Interest and fiscal charges 4,573,690 Refunding bond issuance costs Total expenditures 10,348,690 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures (1,391,490) Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in - General Fund 889,270 Transfers in - Hotel/Motel Fund Transfers out - General Fund Refunding bonds issued Bond discount Payment to refunded bond escrow agent Total other financing sources (uses) 889,270 Excess (deficiency) of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses Fund balance, beginning of year Fund balance, end of year

1,349,568 847,348

Actual

Variance with Final Budget

$ 8,282,873 495,383 8,778,256

5,775,000 4,573,690 32,449 10,381,139

5,775,000 4,282,678 32,168 10,089,846

291,012 281 291,293

5,563,136 3,996,474 105,160 9,664,770

(1,423,939)

(1,311,590)

112,349

(1,166,505)

889,270 7,544,558 (43,046) (7,469,063) 921,719

1,605,584 23,242 (168) 16,671,941 (88,929) (23,052,209) (4,840,539)

(502,220)

(389,871)

112,349

(6,007,044)

1,349,568 847,348

150

1,349,568 959,697

(179,327) 383 (178,944)

Actual

$ 8,462,200 495,000 8,957,200

(502,220)

2014

112,349

8,002,722 495,543 8,498,265

7,356,612 1,349,568

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS HOTEL/MOTEL FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For the year ended September 30, 2015 (With comparative amounts for the year ended September 30, 2014) 2015 Budgeted Amounts Original Final Revenues: Taxes Charges for services: Civic center Railroad Museum Visitor center Interest and other Total revenues Expenditures: Civic center Railroad museum Tourism marketing Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures

2014

Actual

Variance with Final Budget

$ 1,391,500

$ 1,440,351

370,000 77,000 200 1,800 1,840,500

378,500 77,000 200 54,531 1,901,731

415,023 92,204 835 51,824 2,000,237

1,039,791 454,132 346,577 1,840,500

1,156,427 542,953 353,180 2,052,560

1,046,848 437,589 339,771 1,824,208

109,579 105,364 13,409 228,352

1,016,065 545,077 354,417 1,915,559

176,029

326,858

81,101

174 174

176,203

326,858

57,335

326,858

1,101,829 $ 1,159,164

(150,829)

48,851

Actual

36,523 15,204 635 (2,707) 98,506

$ 1,445,935 449,726 83,012 528 17,459 1,996,660

Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in - Health Insurance Fund Transfers out - Health Insurance Fund Transfers out - Debt Service Fund Total other financing sources (uses) Excess (deficiency) of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses Fund balance, beginning of year Fund balance, end of year

174 174

1,159,164 $ 1,159,164

(150,655) 1,159,164 $ 1,008,509

151

1,159,164 $ 1,335,367

(524) (23,242) (23,766)

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS FEDERAL/STATE GRANT FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For the year ended September 30, 2015 (With comparative amounts for the year ended September 30, 2014) 2015 Budgeted Amounts Original Final Revenues: Intergovernmental $ 390,268 Other Total revenues 390,268 Expenditures: General government 58,441 Public safety Highways and streets Sanitation Health and welfare 139,600 Culture and leisure services 192,227 Airport Total expenditures 390,268 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures Other financing sources : Transfers in - General Fund Transfers in - Capital Projects Transfers out - Capital Projects Total other financing sources Excess of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing sources Fund balance, beginning of year Fund balance, end of year $ -

93,000 68,575 390,368 75,975 255,103 396,039 215,683 1,494,743

152

Variance with Final Budget

Actual

$ 1,299,627 92,322 1,391,949

2014

808,031 808,031

(491,596) (92,322) (583,918)

Actual $ 7,751,766 7,751,766

83,132 61,825 83,353 102,069 380,293 161,884 872,556

9,868 6,750 307,015 75,975 153,034 15,746 53,799 622,187

(102,794)

(64,525)

38,269

(53,000)

85,550 17,244 102,794

49,450 15,075 64,525

(36,100) (2,169) (38,269)

50,000 3,000 53,000

42,880 13,462 330,503 278,783 311,179 6,827,959 7,804,766

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS DRAINAGE FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - ACTUAL AND BUDGET For the year ended September 30, 2015 (With comparative amounts for the year ended September 30, 2014)

Exhibit D-2

2015 Budgeted Amounts Original Final Revenues: Drainage fees Interest and other Total revenues Expenditures: Highways and streets: Personnel services Operations Capital outlay Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in-Health Insurance Fund Transfers out-Health Insurance Fund Total other financing sources (uses) Excess (deficiency) of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses Fund balance, beginning of year Fund balance, end of year

2014

Actual

$ 1,114,803 3,000 1,117,803

$ 1,125,126 17,645 1,142,771

765,506 352,297 147,000 1,264,803

791,562 305,485 247,441 1,344,488

(147,000)

(226,685)

(147,000) 1,793,015 $ 1,646,015

174 174

(226,511) 1,793,015 $ 1,566,504

153

Variance with Final Budget 10,323 14,645 24,968

$ 1,109,378 24,325 1,133,703

655,501 174,975 122,322 952,798

136,061 130,510 125,119 391,690

586,429 259,537 349,488 1,195,454

189,973

416,658

(61,751)

174 174

(524) (524)

190,147

416,658

(62,275)

1,793,015 $ 1,983,162

Actual

416,658

1,855,290 $ 1,793,015

154

Supplementary Individual Fund Financial Schedules General Fund These supplementary schedules are included to provide management additional information for financial analysis.

155

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS GENERAL FUND COMPARATIVE BALANCE SHEET September 30, 2015 and 2014

2015

Increase (Decrease)

2014

ASSETS Current Assets: Cash

Investments Receivables (net of allowance for estimated uncollectible): State sales tax Accounts Franchise fees Ad valorem taxes - delinquent Due from other funds Due from other governments Inventories Prepaid items Total current assets

Restricted Assets: Drug enforcement Public safety R.O.W. escrow Parks escrow Rob Roy MacGregor Trust - Library Total restricted assets Total assets

5,050

5,045

29,421,373

1,509,256 974,753 193,816 259,039 -

1,489,789 993,023 180,594 233,793 288,635

19,467 (18,270) 13,222 25,246 (288,635)

46,454 272,842 102,197

46,330 331,454 103,619

124 (58,612) (1,422)

34,135,933

33,093,655

345,852 32,975 269,313 334,803 12,790 995,733

290,550 33,381 269,174 296,472 15,375 904,952

$ 35,131,666

156

30,772,526

33,998,607

1,351,153

1,042,278

55,302 (406) 139 38,331 (2,585) 90,781 $

1,133,059

2015

Increase (Decrease)

2014

LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES Vouchers payable Retainage payable Accrued payroll Vacation and sick leave payable Deposits

Unearned revenues: Ad valorm taxes - delinquent R.O.W. escrow Parks escrow Electric franchise Gas franchise Other Total liabilities Fund Balance: Nonspendable: Inventories and prepaid items Restricted for: Drug enforcement Public safety Rob Roy MacGregor Trust - Library Municipal court restricted fees Vital statistics preservation fund Public education channel Assigned to: Technology replacement Capital projects Encumbrances Unassigned Total fund balance Total liabilities and fund balances

3,314,556 4,600 1,098,512 579,803 52,772

2,459,875 3,659 1,988,062 557,991 56,017

854,681 941 (889,550) 21,812 (3,245)

231,454 269,313 334,803 1,478,184 310,477 127,936 7,802,410

206,208 269,174 296,472 1,486,275 389,420 178,230 7,891,383

25,246 139 38,331 (8,091) (78,943) (50,294) (88,973)

375,039

435,073

(60,034)

345,852 32,975 12,790 617,769 48,504 155,432

290,550 33,381 15,375 527,930 41,940 153,884

55,302 (406) (2,585) 89,839 6,564 1,548

420,476 4,920,337 2,106,552 18,293,530 27,329,256 $ 35,131,666

403,071 5,211,128 1,454,214 17,540,678 26,107,224 33,998,607

17,405 (290,791) 652,338 752,852 1,222,032 1,133,059

157

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS GENERAL FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For the year ended September 30, 2015 (With comparative amounts for the year ended September 30, 2014) 2015

2014

Budgeted Amounts

Variance with

Original

Final

Actual

Final Budget

$ 31,883,641

$ 34,058,553

6,360,370

6,668,070

6,780,354

628,500

613,187

(15,313)

95,107

353,028

71,823

(281,205)

21,049,258

22,121,597

22,404,557

2,061,362

2,062,737

670,774

940,688

62,749,012

General government Public safety

Actual

Revenues: Taxes Franchise fees Licenses and permits Intergovernmental Charges for services

2,174,912

$ 31,390,633

112,284

6,382,782 662,666 22,939

282,960

21,457,272

2,086,676

23,939

2,438,908

1,096,521

155,833

2,024,874

64,658,261

67,111,671

2,453,410

64,380,074

14,912,143

16,730,258

14,782,723

1,947,535

14,072,889

27,636,999

29,735,973

29,204,662

531,311

27,028,615

Highways and streets

3,445,554

3,742,918

3,018,125

724,793

3,020,229

Sanitation

5,711,665

5,858,088

5,171,235

686,853

5,329,772

Culture and leisure services

9,850,329

10,336,404

9,335,393

1,001,011

9,817,087

Airport

2,965,790

3,016,085

2,478,744

537,341

3,184,039

46,194

45,200

Fines Interest and other Total revenues Expenditures:

Debt Service: Principal Interest Total expenditures

8,977

8,976

9,219

64,577,651

69,474,897

64,046,052

5,428,845

62,507,050

(1,828,639)

(4,816,636)

3,065,619

7,882,255

1,873,024

168

Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in (out): Transfers in - Debt Service Fund

Transfers in - Health Insurance Fund

14,824

Transfers out - Grant Fund

(85,550)

(49,450)

36,100

(1,003,923)

(907,432)

96,491

(487,405)

(889,270)

(1,605,584)

(89,909)

(12,259)

77,650

(112,695)

Transfers out - Capital Projects Transfers out - Debt Service Fund

(889,270)

(50,000)

Transfers out - Bond Programs

Transfers out - Health Insurance Fund

(44,478)

Issuance of lease

420,121

Total other financing sources (uses)

(889,270)

(2,053,828)

(1,843,587)

(2,717,909)

(6,870,464)

1,222,032

210,241

(1,879,873)

8,092,496

(6,849)

Excess (deficiency) of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses Fund balance, beginning of period Fund balance, end of period

26,107,224 $ 23,389,315

26,107,224 $ 19,236,760

158

26,107,224 $ 27,329,256

8,092,496

26,114,073 $ 26,107,224

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS GENERAL FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For the year ended September 30, 2015 (With comparative amounts for the year ended September 30, 2014) 2015 Budgeted Amounts Original Final Taxes: Ad valorem: Property, current year Property, prior year Penalty and interest Total ad valorem taxes

Actual

$ 12,356,574 129,067 90,000 12,575,641

$ 12,361,868 71,187 85,333 12,518,388

19,100,000 140,000 38,000 30,000 19,308,000 31,883,641

2,975,000 575,000 425,000 560,000 1,649,840 175,530 6,360,370

Non-property taxes: City sales Mixed beverage Occupation Bingo Total non-property taxes Total taxes Franchise Fees: Electric franchise Gas franchise Telephone franchise Cable franchise Water/Sewer franchise Other Total franchise fees Licenses and permits: Building permits Electrical permits and licenses Mechanical Plumbing permit fees Other Total licenses and permits Intergovernmental revenues: Federal grants State grants State reimbursements Department of Civil Preparedness Total intergovernmental revenues

2014

Variance with Final Budget 5,294 (57,880) (4,667) (57,253)

$ 11,962,834 92,327 126,971 12,182,132

21,311,743 156,030 48,753 23,639 21,540,165 34,058,553

2,211,743 16,030 10,753 (6,361) 2,232,165 2,174,912

18,981,471 155,280 39,985 31,765 19,208,501 31,390,633

3,080,900 776,800 425,000 638,530 1,649,840 97,000 6,668,070

3,080,962 776,821 417,820 738,303 1,649,840 116,608 6,780,354

62 21 (7,180) 99,773 19,608 112,284

3,000,775 606,950 428,972 693,908 1,552,508 99,669 6,382,782

300,000 60,000 72,000 100,000 96,500 628,500

208,147 83,907 71,208 124,310 125,615 613,187

(91,853) 23,907 (792) 24,310 29,115 (15,313)

265,979 74,284 73,413 114,098 134,892 662,666

50,000 8,352

16,596 291,325 8,352

16,595 7,800 8,352

(1) (283,525) -

6,343 6,375 8,352

36,755 95,107

36,755 353,028

159

39,076 71,823

Actual

2,321 (281,205)

1,869 22,939 (Continued)

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS GENERAL FUND SCHEDULE OF REVENUES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For the year ended September 30, 2015 (With comparative amounts for the year ended September 30, 2014)

(Continued)

2015 Budgeted Amounts Original Final Charges for services: Library fees Recreational entry fees Summit recreational fees Golf course revenues Swimming pool Lions Junction water park Sammons indoor pool Vital statistics Police revenue Contractual services -proprietary fund County fire protection Curb and street cuts Other Solid waste collection - residential Solid waste collection - commercial Solid waste collection - roll-off Landfill contract Airport sales and rental Recreational services Fire department Subdivision fees Total charges for services Fines: Court Animal pound Code enforcement Overparking Administrative fees Total fines Interest and other: Interest Lease and rental Sale of fixed assets Insurance claims Payment in lieu of taxes Building rental BOA bldg. Other Total Interest and other Total revenues

24,000 133,300 530,200 1,084,000 35,000 294,800 97,000 98,000 542,217

25,209 133,300 530,200 1,084,000 35,000 308,100 97,000 98,000 1,198,762

2014

Actual $

32,118 120,588 486,234 789,908 48,870 351,788 91,330 124,847 1,602,266

Variance with Final Budget $

6,909 (12,712) (43,966) (294,092) 13,870 43,688 (5,670) 26,847 403,504

Actual $

32,498 126,845 526,310 874,917 48,030 298,690 91,705 120,542 629,586

3,689,884 1,200 12,000 150,000 4,111,691 2,891,000 1,991,000 1,772,981 2,594,985 980,000 1,000 15,000 21,049,258

3,689,884 4,629 12,000 489,574 4,111,691 2,891,000 1,991,000 1,772,981 2,606,664 1,000,130 27,473 15,000 22,121,597

3,702,807 4,630 62,195 301,443 4,169,597 2,945,727 2,216,659 1,971,203 2,294,963 1,034,161 34,758 18,465 22,404,557

12,923 1 50,195 (188,131) 57,906 54,727 225,659 198,222 (311,701) 34,031 7,285 3,465 282,960

3,480,132 1,341 38,732 159,130 4,041,272 2,902,758 2,314,814 1,963,924 2,732,476 1,028,223 20,620 24,727 21,457,272

1,545,286 40,000 15,000 461,076 2,061,362

1,545,286 40,000 15,000 462,451 2,062,737

1,474,837 51,514 8,405 551,920 2,086,676

(70,449) 11,514 (6,595) 89,469 23,939

1,736,513 45,714 250 22,916 633,515 2,438,908

60,000 354,609 52,500 42,000 13,645

60,000 354,609 55,500 182,971 13,645

110,032 371,686 99,455 177,665 14,548

50,032 17,077 43,955 (5,306) 903

67,755 356,842 898,937 196,146 13,645

78,820 69,200 670,774 $ 62,749,012

78,820 195,143 940,688 $ 64,658,261

90,664 232,471 1,096,521 $ 67,111,671

160

11,844 37,328 155,833 $ 2,453,410

90,486 401,063 2,024,874 $ 64,380,074

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS GENERAL FUND SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For the year ended September 30, 2015 (With comparative amounts for the year ended September 30, 2014) 2015 Budgeted Amounts Original Final General government: City council City manager Assistant city manager Administrative services Finance Purchasing City secretary Special services Legal City planning Information technology services Human resources Economic development Fleet services Inspections Permits Facility services Public safety: Municipal court Police Animal control Fire Communications Code enforcement Highways and streets: Street Traffic signals Engineering Sanitation: Culture and leisure services: Parks Leisure services PALS administration Golf course Library Airport: Debt service: Totals

209,204 492,706 243,857 270,931 1,277,171 304,346 356,975 2,077,806 697,468 520,978 2,920,562 662,240 2,119,549 988,916 302,098 250,559 1,216,777 14,912,143

197,343 857,911 199,607 254,280 1,362,585 380,337 403,057 1,410,256 754,344 599,066 3,168,840 687,253 3,241,849 1,110,799 313,063 209,800 1,579,868 16,730,258

2014

Actual $

161,848 577,167 188,886 204,114 1,340,039 372,628 320,763 1,057,421 712,091 547,756 2,811,338 506,272 3,241,849 1,012,107 284,250 186,051 1,258,143 14,782,723

Variance with Final Budget $

35,495 280,744 10,721 50,166 22,546 7,709 82,294 352,835 42,253 51,310 357,502 180,981 98,692 28,813 23,749 321,725 1,947,535

Actual $

157,455 598,684 213,979 190,261 1,173,561 320,696 257,313 1,147,083 660,721 396,441 2,280,865 519,582 3,587,088 1,019,964 247,056 168,616 1,133,524 14,072,889

669,915 14,563,115 436,705 10,704,765 749,220 513,279 27,636,999

710,867 15,656,565 478,884 11,523,529 749,220 616,908 29,735,973

681,058 15,342,229 437,426 11,462,456 749,220 532,273 29,204,662

29,809 314,336 41,458 61,073 84,635 531,311

653,506 14,448,440 425,864 10,295,626 744,841 460,338 27,028,615

2,553,382 345,896 546,276 3,445,554

2,799,129 377,646 566,143 3,742,918

2,228,880 307,040 482,205 3,018,125

570,249 70,606 83,938 724,793

2,267,382 291,858 460,989 3,020,229

5,711,665

5,858,088

5,171,235

686,853

5,329,772

3,313,452 3,147,425 502,488 1,240,302 1,646,662 9,850,329

3,435,497 3,341,617 549,381 1,293,361 1,716,548 10,336,404

3,025,039 3,084,331 542,871 1,110,934 1,572,218 9,335,393

410,458 257,286 6,510 182,427 144,330 1,001,011

3,352,269 2,892,524 551,498 1,424,696 1,596,100 9,817,087

2,965,790

3,016,085

2,478,744

537,341

3,184,039

55,171 $ 64,577,651

55,171 $ 69,474,897

55,170 $ 64,046,052

1 $ 5,428,845

54,419 $ 62,507,050

161

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS GENERAL FUND DETAILED SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For the year ended September 30, 2015 (With comparative amounts for the year ended September 30, 2014) 2015

Budgeted Amounts Original Final General government: City council: Personnel services Operations City manager: Personnel services Operations Capital outlay Assistant city manager: Personnel services Operations Administrative services: Personnel services Operations Capital outlay Finance: Personnel services Operations Purchasing: Personnel services Operations City secretary: Personnel services Operations Special services: Personnel services Operations Capital outlay Contingency Legal: Personnel services Operations City planning: Personnel services Operations Capital outlay Information technology services: Personnel services Operations Capital outlay Human resources: Personnel services Operations Economic development: Operations Fleet services: Personnel services Operations Capital outlay

26,324 182,880 209,204

17,552 179,791 197,343

2014

Actual

5,972 155,876 161,848

Variance with Final Budget

11,580 23,915 35,495

Actual

7,109 150,346 157,455

429,430 63,276 492,706

494,443 318,745 44,723 857,911

475,572 58,249 43,346 577,167

18,871 260,496 1,377 280,744

547,335 51,349 598,684

234,437 9,420 243,857

190,187 9,420 199,607

180,647 8,239 188,886

9,540 1,181 10,721

184,714 29,265 213,979

221,206 49,725 270,931

203,186 21,094 30,000 254,280

181,099 14,050 8,965 204,114

22,087 7,044 21,035 50,166

176,233 14,028 190,261

808,875 468,296 1,277,171

846,701 515,884 1,362,585

845,266 494,773 1,340,039

1,435 21,111 22,546

738,852 434,709 1,173,561

289,121 15,225 304,346

357,019 23,318 380,337

351,543 21,085 372,628

5,476 2,233 7,709

290,957 29,739 320,696

261,593 95,382 356,975

274,630 128,427 403,057

269,571 51,192 320,763

5,059 77,235 82,294

218,596 38,717 257,313

351,081 698,655 1,028,070 2,077,806

476,081 915,646 18,529 1,410,256

459,812 587,641 9,968 1,057,421

16,269 328,005 8,561 352,835

573,957 566,314 6,812 1,147,083

633,134 64,334 697,468

692,202 62,142 754,344

656,722 55,369 712,091

35,480 6,773 42,253

609,192 51,529 660,721

458,754 62,224 520,978

537,694 61,024 348 599,066

521,351 26,405 547,756

16,343 34,619 348 51,310

320,864 49,127 26,450 396,441

1,185,018 1,170,544 565,000 2,920,562

1,231,231 1,184,101 753,508 3,168,840

1,179,544 1,121,287 510,507 2,811,338

51,687 62,814 243,001 357,502

1,026,912 1,018,519 235,434 2,280,865

513,387 148,853 662,240

523,583 163,670 687,253

410,226 96,046 506,272

113,357 67,624 180,981

409,904 109,678 519,582

2,119,549 2,119,549

3,241,849 3,241,849

3,587,088 3,587,088

900,363 88,553 988,916

943,541 90,328 76,930 1,110,799

919,587 60,530 31,990 1,012,107

23,954 29,798 44,940 98,692

848,404 69,544 102,016 1,019,964 (Continued)

162

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS GENERAL FUND DETAILED SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For the year ended September 30, 2015 (With comparative amounts for the year ended September 30, 2014)

(Continued)

2015

Budgeted Amounts Original Final Inspections: Personnel services Operations Capital outlay Permits: Personnel services Operations Capital outlay Facility services: Personnel services Operations Capital outlay Total general government Public safety: Municipal court: Personnel services Operations Police: Personnel services Operations Capital outlay Animal control: Personnel services Operations Capital outlay Fire: Personnel services Operations Capital outlay Communications: Operations Code enforcement: Personnel services Operations Capital outlay Total public safety Highways and streets: Street : Personnel services Operations Capital outlay Traffic signals: Personnel services Operations Capital outlay Engineering: Personnel services Operations Total highways and streets

262,785 39,313 302,098

273,253 39,810 313,063

2014

Actual $

265,333 18,917 284,250

Variance with Final Budget $

7,920 20,893 28,813

Actual $

207,761 19,744 19,551 247,056

191,239 14,320 45,000 250,559

142,362 18,938 48,500 209,800

119,687 18,364 48,000 186,051

22,675 574 500 23,749

149,793 18,823 168,616

606,526 598,301 11,950 1,216,777 14,912,143

639,086 612,347 328,435 1,579,868 16,730,258

553,896 515,740 188,507 1,258,143 14,782,723

85,190 96,607 139,928 321,725 1,947,535

531,239 516,317 85,968 1,133,524 14,072,889

603,232 66,683 669,915

631,213 79,654 710,867

619,109 61,949 681,058

12,104 17,705 29,809

602,428 51,078 653,506

12,350,038 1,459,462 753,615 14,563,115

13,074,553 1,689,522 892,490 15,656,565

13,073,232 1,547,044 721,953 15,342,229

1,321 142,478 170,537 314,336

11,946,311 1,407,428 1,094,701 14,448,440

341,708 94,997 436,705

357,715 100,796 20,373 478,884

354,648 82,778 437,426

3,067 18,018 20,373 41,458

341,086 84,778 425,864

9,567,746 891,954 245,065 10,704,765

10,070,750 893,590 559,189 11,523,529

10,070,231 844,687 547,538 11,462,456

519 48,903 11,651 61,073

9,416,576 851,249 27,801 10,295,626

749,220 749,220

744,841 744,841

364,560 125,719 23,000 513,279 27,636,999

410,624 170,754 35,530 616,908 29,735,973

378,580 141,579 12,114 532,273 29,204,662

32,044 29,175 23,416 84,635 531,311

321,347 119,390 19,601 460,338 27,028,615

980,512 1,308,870 264,000 2,553,382

1,014,963 1,301,940 482,226 2,799,129

916,401 1,080,254 232,225 2,228,880

98,562 221,686 250,001 570,249

973,547 1,163,228 130,607 2,267,382

242,482 57,010 46,404 345,896

254,622 63,609 59,415 377,646

244,851 43,396 18,793 307,040

9,771 20,213 40,622 70,606

181,211 44,183 66,464 291,858

410,819 135,457 546,276 3,445,554

429,912 136,231 566,143 3,742,918

415,906 66,299 482,205 3,018,125

14,006 69,932 83,938 724,793

392,649 68,340 460,989 3,020,229 (Continued)

163

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS GENERAL FUND DETAILED SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL For the year ended September 30, 2015 (With comparative amounts for the year ended September 30, 2014)

(Continued)

2015

Budgeted Amounts Original Final Sanitation: Personnel services Operations Capital outlay Total sanitation Culture and leisure services: Parks Personnel services Operations Capital outlay Leisure services Personnel services Operations Capital outlay Parks & leisure services administration Personnel services Operations Golf course Personnel services Operations Capital outlay Library: Personnel services Operations Capital outlay Total culture & leisure services Airport: Personnel services Operations Capital outlay Total airport Debt service: Principal Interest Total debt service Total

2,069,909 3,158,756 483,000 5,711,665

2,152,902 3,141,289 563,897 5,858,088

2014

Actual $

2,115,783 3,014,741 40,711 5,171,235

Variance with Final Budget $

37,119 126,548 523,186 686,853

Actual $

2,088,496 3,183,607 57,669 5,329,772

1,500,099 1,611,209 202,144 3,313,452

1,526,443 1,636,308 272,746 3,435,497

1,439,019 1,438,218 147,802 3,025,039

87,424 198,090 124,944 410,458

1,391,767 1,517,482 443,020 3,352,269

1,977,745 1,119,680 50,000 3,147,425

2,045,688 1,153,561 142,368 3,341,617

1,936,010 1,070,515 77,806 3,084,331

109,678 83,046 64,562 257,286

1,859,104 1,019,264 14,156 2,892,524

367,147 135,341 502,488

383,564 165,817 549,381

380,574 162,297 542,871

2,990 3,520 6,510

363,790 187,708 551,498

661,702 518,600 60,000 1,240,302

687,980 491,848 113,533 1,293,361

667,481 364,627 78,826 1,110,934

20,499 127,221 34,707 182,427

599,507 368,291 456,898 1,424,696

1,099,108 536,554 11,000 1,646,662 9,850,329

1,142,002 555,621 18,925 1,716,548 10,336,404

1,039,151 514,142 18,925 1,572,218 9,335,393

102,851 41,479 144,330 1,001,011

1,079,114 499,958 17,028 1,596,100 9,817,087

758,909 2,076,881 130,000 2,965,790

791,966 2,082,139 141,980 3,016,085

776,763 1,570,223 131,758 2,478,744

15,203 511,916 10,222 537,341

734,538 2,121,932 327,569 3,184,039

46,194 8,977 55,171

46,194 8,976 55,170

1 1

45,200 9,219 54,419

$ 64,577,651

$ 69,474,897

164

64,046,052

5,428,845

62,507,050

Agency Fund Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities

165

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS AGENCY FUND STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES TEMPLE HEALTH & BIOSCIENCE ECONOMIC DISTRICT For the year ended September 30, 2015 Balances October 1, 2014

Additions

Deductions

Balances September 30, 2015

ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents Property taxes receivable Other assets Total assets

3,138,501 15,667 21,156 3,175,324

25,903 15,607 3,133,814 3,175,324

1,829,084 1,023,067 7,966 2,860,117

18,396 1,023,067 1,818,654 2,860,117

1,718,891 1,019,540 16,181 2,754,612

25,903 1,020,985 1,707,724 2,754,612

3,248,694 19,194 12,941 3,280,829

LIABILITIES

Vouchers payable Unearned revenue Other Total liabilities

166

18,396 17,689 3,244,744 3,280,829

Supplementary Schedules

167

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AND STATE AWARDS For the year ended September 30, 2015 Federal/State Grantor Agency or Pass-Through Program Title

Federal CFDA Number

Grant Number

Federal Assistance: U.S. Department of H.U.D. CDBG 2013 CDBG 2014

14.218 14.218

B-13-MC-48-0021 B-14-MC-48-0021

Program or Award Amount

408,865 390,268

Program Expenditures

273,569 269,337 542,906

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Texas Department of State Health Services Texas Healthy Communities

93.283

2015-047235-001

50,000

49,924 49,924

U.S. Department of Homeland Security Texas Department of Public Safety: Civil Defense

97.042

15TX-EMPG-1142

39,076

39,076 39,076

U.S. Department of Justice 2014 Bullet Proof Vests Grant

16.607

2013-BU-BX-13069168

8,603

8,603 8,603

Killeen Police Department: 2013 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant 2014 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant

16.738 16.738

2013-DJ-BX-0695 2014-DJ-BX-0299

17,852 20,223

17,852 20,223 38,075 46,678

U.S. Department of Transportation Texas Department of Transportation: Surface Transportation Enhancement Program (STEP) Pass-Through Agreement Transportation Alternatives Project North 31st.

20.205 20.205 20.205

0909-36-133 0320-06-001 0909-36-150

2,155,000 16,555,000 234,064

13,060 13,060

Institute of Museum and Library Services Texas State Library and Archives Commission Interlibrary Loan Program

45.310

LS-00-13-0044-13

7,992

7,992 7,992

Office of the Governor - Criminal Justice Division Crisis Assistance Program

25,550

18,800 18,800

Texas Department of Transportation 2015 Routine Airport Maintenance Program (RAMP) Airport Project Participation Grant - NPE

M1509TEMP 1509TMPLE

50,000 300,000

50,000 300,000 350,000

Texas A&M Forest Service TIFMAS Grant Assistance Program

6,450

6,450 6,450

6,300

6,300 6,300

State Assistance:

Texas State University System Texas School Safety Center Tobacco Prevention and Community Services Division Tobacco Enforcement Program

$ 20,275,243

Total Federal and State Financial Assistance

1,081,186 (Continued)

168

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AND STATE AWARDS For the year ended September 30, 2015

(Continued)

Federal/State Grantor Agency or Pass-Through

Federal CFDA

Grant

Program or Award

Program

Program Title

Number

Amount

Expenditures

15MPTMPLE

20.205

0184-04-046

State Administered Financial Assistance Texas Department of Transportation - Aviation Division Capital Improvement Program - Airport Master Plan U.S. Department of Transportation Texas Department of Transportation: Loop 363 & Spur 290 (1st Street) Phase I Intersection Reconstruction Total State Administered Financial Assistance

Total Federal, State and State Administered Financial Assistance

215,683

140,316

6,236,650

6,452,333

140,316

$ 26,727,576

169

1,221,502

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NOTES TO SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AND STATE AWARDS For the year ended September 30, 2015 General - The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal and State Awards presents the activity of all federal and state financial assistance programs of the City of Temple, Texas. The City’s reporting entity is defined in Note I to the City’s financial statements. The information in this schedule is presented in accordance with the requirements of OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Because the schedule presents only a selected portion of the operations of the City, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position, or cash flows of the City. Federal financial assistance received directly from federal agencies as well as federal financial assistance passed through other government agencies is included on the schedule. State financial assistance received directly from state agencies is also included on the schedule. Basis of Accounting - The accompanying schedule of federal and state financial assistance is presented using the modified accrual basis of accounting, which is described in Note I to the City’s financial statements. Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Relationship to Federal and State Financial Reports - Amounts reported in the accompanying schedule agree with the amounts reported in the related federal and state financial reports in all material respects. Subgrantees – The federal expenditures for the Community Development Block Grant program include grants to subrecipients as follows: Community Development Block Grant

Subrecipient Families in Crisis Family Promise of East Bell County, Inc. Hill Country Community Action Association Temple HELP Center

12,000 10,000 14,000 18,600

54,600

Program Income – In accordance with terms of the Community Development Block Grant Program, program income totaling $ 0 was used to reduce the amount of federal funds in conjunction with the program’s objective.

170

Statistical Section (Unaudited) This part of the City of Temple’s comprehensive annual financial report presents detailed information as a context for understanding what the information in the financial statements, note disclosures, and required supplementary information says about the government’s overall financial health. Contents

Page

Financial Trends

172

These schedules contain trend information to help the reader understand how the government’s financial performance and well-being have changed over time. Revenue Capacity

178

These schedules contain information to help the reader assess the government’s most significant local revenue source, the property tax. Debt Capacity

184

These schedules present information to help the reader assess the affordability of the government’s current levels of outstanding debt and the government’s ability to issue additional debt in the future. Demographic and Economic Information

189

These schedules offer demographic and economic indicators to help the reader understand the environment within which the government’s financial activities take place. Operating Information

191

These schedules contain service and infrastructure data to help the reader understand how the information in the government’s financial report relates to the services the government provides and the activities it performs. Other Information These schedules contain other information related to government’s operations.

201

Sources: Unless otherwise noted, the information in these schedules is derived from the comprehensive annual financial reports for the relevant year.

171

172

$ 52,774,867 644,563 17,924,900 $ 71,344,330

$ 47,403,033 3,737,718 9,259,983 $ 60,400,734

$ 100,177,900 4,382,281 27,184,883 $ 131,745,064

Business-type activities Net investment in capital assets Restricted Unrestricted, as restated Total business-type activities net position

Primary government Net investment in capital assets Restricted Unrestricted Total primary government net position

2006

Governmental activities Net investment in capital assets Restricted Unrestricted, as restated Total governmental activities net position

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS NET POSITION BY COMPONENT Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting)

$102,621,403 5,006,429 32,244,820 $139,872,652

$ 49,636,049 3,876,084 12,398,097 $ 65,910,230

$ 52,985,354 1,130,345 19,846,723 $ 73,962,422

2007

$ 103,346,676 5,718,256 33,731,355 $ 142,796,287

$ 50,857,397 3,973,724 16,447,880 $ 71,279,001

$ 52,489,279 1,744,532 17,283,475 $ 71,517,286

2008

$ 106,880,873 5,489,967 35,404,213 $ 147,775,053

$ 54,645,573 3,951,535 18,016,855 $ 76,613,963

$ 52,235,300 1,538,432 17,387,358 $ 71,161,090

2009

$ 112,351,990 6,192,234 34,727,881 $ 153,272,105

$ 56,948,517 4,433,417 17,483,818 $ 78,865,752

2011

$ 114,357,937 5,413,792 37,040,774 $ 156,812,503

$ 62,157,571 4,559,630 18,278,226 $ 84,995,427

$ 52,200,366 854,162 18,762,548 $ 71,817,076

Fiscal Year

$ 55,403,473 1,758,817 17,244,063 $ 74,406,353

2010

$ 113,434,201 4,928,870 40,378,342 $ 158,741,413

$ 65,054,555 2,723,415 22,075,622 $ 89,853,592

$ 48,379,646 2,205,455 18,302,720 $ 68,887,821

2012

$ 114,652,996 7,541,960 44,208,563 $ 166,403,519

$ 68,521,536 925,059 24,794,589 $ 94,241,184

$ 46,131,460 6,616,901 19,413,974 $ 72,162,335

2013

$ 117,666,127 2,036,786 42,991,066 $ 162,693,979

$ 72,979,933 1,330,549 24,712,330 $ 99,022,812

$ 44,686,194 706,237 18,278,736 $ 63,671,167

2014

$ 110,466,092 2,294,165 26,326,257 $ 139,086,514

$ 69,469,800 1,334,468 31,192,966 $ 101,997,234

$ 40,996,292 959,697 (4,866,709) $ 37,089,280

2015

Table I

173 22,770,255 3,130 22,773,385

Business-type activities: Charges for services: Water and sewer Operating grants and contributions Capital grants and contributions Total business-type activities program revenues $ 45,837,007

3,177,892 2,516,712 725,052 8,118,865 2,172,190 2,412,573 1,311,852 2,628,486 23,063,622

Program Revenues Governmental activities: Fees, Fines, and Charges for Services: General government Public safety Highways and streets Sanitation Cultural and leisure services Airport Operating grants and contributions Capital grants and contributions Total governmental activities program revenues

Total primary government program revenues

74,569,955

Total primary government expenses

9,227,610 21,711,235 5,623,378 5,100,633 739,750 8,646,296 2,701,816 2,439,715 56,190,433 18,379,522 18,379,522

2006

Business-type activities: Water and sewer Total business-type activities expenses

Expenses Governmental activities: General government Public safety Highways and streets Sanitation Health and welfare Cultural and leisure services Airport Interest on long term debt Total governmental activities expenses

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS CHANGES IN NET POSITION Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting)

$ 44,861,676

21,815,931 1,366,031 23,181,962

3,365,992 2,584,509 729,368 8,807,165 2,371,659 2,388,479 461,062 971,480 21,679,714

79,236,274

19,355,126 19,355,126

$ 11,021,864 22,895,298 5,131,500 5,646,430 349,971 9,352,959 2,775,654 2,707,472 59,881,148

2007

$ 48,886,429

25,014,928 564,609 25,579,537

3,357,505 2,875,433 802,199 8,972,328 2,662,145 3,175,668 562,086 899,528 23,306,892

88,422,701

20,852,467 20,852,467

$ 12,399,274 23,967,943 8,605,895 5,578,902 272,490 10,593,111 3,719,181 2,433,438 67,570,234

2008

$ 50,486,324

27,390,285 2,763 27,393,048

3,447,523 2,418,173 1,111,834 9,398,631 2,807,967 2,224,004 482,504 1,202,640 23,093,276

87,614,592

22,293,459 22,293,459

$ 11,973,280 25,002,639 6,307,841 4,945,085 220,728 10,556,001 3,068,653 3,246,906 65,321,133

2009

$ 52,576,887

25,929,814 106,221 26,036,035

3,432,373 2,501,244 1,111,434 10,045,117 3,157,108 2,311,344 732,270 3,249,962 26,540,852

88,980,921

23,926,631 23,926,631

$ 11,469,892 24,674,521 6,090,841 5,241,149 318,782 10,659,300 3,178,623 3,421,182 65,054,290

2011

$ 54,408,223

29,387,212 29,387,212

3,285,507 2,886,737 1,127,601 10,065,522 2,935,299 2,874,462 867,166 978,717 25,021,011

95,574,877

23,384,255 23,384,255

$ 12,099,128 29,791,300 7,155,289 5,131,467 273,641 10,908,726 3,791,164 3,039,907 72,190,622

Fiscal Year 2010

$ 55,021,469

28,645,921 74,735 28,720,656

3,359,920 2,756,996 1,235,792 10,145,513 3,689,340 3,037,702 517,463 1,558,087 26,300,813

97,779,451

24,220,726 24,220,726

$ 12,308,008 26,988,933 10,413,550 5,469,440 244,943 11,463,800 3,980,015 2,690,036 73,558,725

2012

$ 73,076,125

30,046,938 248,996 30,295,934

3,691,433 3,140,024 1,202,744 10,509,545 3,759,669 2,847,211 225,720 17,403,845 42,780,191

116,581,785

25,713,333 25,713,333

$ 13,493,386 27,732,226 22,080,671 6,039,912 93,539 13,471,535 3,725,020 4,232,163 90,868,452

2013

$ 70,950,765

29,824,871 1,330,056 31,154,927

3,900,990 3,753,119 1,238,493 11,222,768 3,710,483 2,732,476 513,508 12,724,001 39,795,838

124,565,139

26,882,060 26,882,060

$ 14,634,734 28,224,373 28,047,101 7,080,709 35,755 12,365,268 3,655,194 3,639,945 97,683,079

2014

$ 58,746,254 (continued)

30,375,811 381,295 30,757,106

4,143,573 4,341,516 1,322,099 11,303,186 3,703,956 2,294,963 488,829 391,026 27,989,148

107,494,338

26,081,271 26,081,271

$ 14,904,124 29,912,951 10,259,565 5,990,896 112,058 12,312,968 3,683,154 4,237,351 81,413,067

2015

Table II

174 4,410,498 5,050,312 9,460,810

Changes in Net Position Governmental activities Business-type activities Total primary government $

38,193,758

Total primary government

656,449 656,449

$ 13,801,987 13,934,218 5,562,043 1,028,787 89,878 53,087 1,590,252 1,477,057 37,537,309

General Revenues and Other Changes in Net Position Governmental activities: Taxes: Ad valorem Sales Franchise Hotel/Motel Mixed beverage Other taxes Investment earnings Miscellaneous Settlement income, net expense Transfers Total governmental activities

Business-type activities: Investment earnings Miscellaneous Transfers Total business-type activities

$ (33,126,811) 4,393,863 $ (28,732,948)

2006

Net (Expense) Revenue Governmental activities Business-type activities Total primary government net expense

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS CHANGES IN NET POSITION Last Ten Fiscal Years (accrual basis of accounting)

2,618,092 4,759,496 7,377,588

41,752,186

932,660 932,660

$ 14,788,877 14,933,628 5,855,401 1,029,398 96,724 52,539 2,319,714 1,743,245 40,819,526

$ (38,201,434) 3,826,836 $ (34,374,598)

2007

(2,445,136) 5,368,771 2,923,635

42,459,907

641,701 641,701

$ 15,825,309 15,510,913 6,066,459 1,210,494 108,764 54,077 1,487,908 1,554,282 41,818,206

$ (44,263,342) 4,727,070 $ (39,536,272)

2008

(356,196) 5,334,962 4,978,766

42,107,034

235,373 235,373

$ 16,837,010 15,238,812 6,373,864 1,067,836 106,387 54,198 464,244 1,729,310 41,871,661

$ (42,227,857) 5,099,589 $ (37,128,268)

2009

3,245,263 2,251,789 5,497,052

41,901,086

142,385 142,385

$ 17,655,483 15,134,138 6,152,140 1,104,894 106,418 55,750 164,385 1,385,493 41,758,701

$ (38,513,438) 2,109,404 $ (36,404,034)

2011

(2,597,004) 6,129,675 3,532,671

44,699,325

126,718 126,718

$ 17,582,789 16,125,862 6,216,239 1,215,396 123,581 70,191 88,140 3,150,409 44,572,607

$ (47,169,611) 6,002,957 $ (41,166,654)

Fiscal Year 2010

(2,929,255) 4,858,165 1,928,910

44,686,892

358,235 358,235

$ 18,195,808 16,967,401 6,260,051 1,223,910 100,164 77,451 81,493 1,422,379 44,328,657

$ (47,257,912) 4,499,930 $ (42,757,982)

2012

4,083,096 4,858,426 8,941,522

52,447,182

323,317 (47,492) 275,825

$ 19,195,036 18,017,575 6,178,547 1,306,257 110,409 80,817 122,330 1,762,894 5,350,000 47,492 52,171,357

$ (48,088,261) 4,582,601 $ (43,505,660)

2013

(8,491,168) 4,781,628 (3,709,540)

49,904,834

515,564 (6,803) 508,761

$ 20,187,267 18,981,471 6,382,781 1,445,935 155,280 71,750 108,848 2,055,938 6,803 49,396,073

$ (57,887,241) 4,272,867 $ (53,614,374)

2014

(1,915,122) 5,031,341 3,116,219

51,864,303

353,239 2,267 355,506

$ 20,847,366 21,311,743 6,780,354 1,440,351 156,030 72,392 156,778 746,050 (2,267) 51,508,797

$ (53,423,919) 4,675,835 $ (48,748,084)

2015

Table II (Continued)

175 $

766,162 $ 10,312,801

500,117 3,593,041

2,000 1,130,345 7,443,797 970,497

644,563 1,536,715 909,574

2,072

526,345 5,924,986 1,482,391 14,478,768 $ 23,545,793

360,101

621,000 5,648,213 1,237,527 13,274,017 $ 21,973,736

$ 197,743 575,459

384,880

2007

280,045 528,054

2006

304,931 642,816

389,222

1,744,532 22,212,809 1,208,688

2,000

558,905 $ 25,726,934

349,587 3,793,396 1,135,807 15,048,035 $ 21,663,794

2008

298,679 368,817

361,371

1,538,432 9,310,110 1,027,344

5,098

999,253 $ 12,880,237

569,240 4,634,697 1,951,008 15,048,035 $ 23,231,847

2009

329,408 469,706

375,993

1,758,817 15,349,088 913,293

4,581

1,265,722 $ 19,291,501

231,207 5,630,052 1,532,988 15,050,138 $ 23,619,492

$ 384,797 636,101

448,025

1,364,049 4,585,041 1,149,063

4,555

1,279,068 $ 8,381,776

329,162 6,375,154 275,000 1,109,456 15,368,477 $ 24,926,172

Fiscal Year (1) 2010 2011

- The City implemented GASB Statement No. 54 Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions in fiscal year 2011. Fiscal years 2005 through 2010 have been reclassified with the implementation of GASB Statement No. 54.

All other governmental funds Nonspendable: Prepaid items Restricted for: Debt service Construction Museum Promotion of tourism Committed to: Drainage Total all other governmental funds

General fund Nonspendable: Inventories and prepaid items Restricted for: Drug enforcement Library, museum, and other Assigned to: Capital technology acquisition Capital projects Self-funded health insurance Encumbrances Unassigned Total general fund

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Last Ten Fiscal Years (modified accrual basis of accounting)

321,867 629,792

498,812

2,960,522 30,398,210 1,350,812

4,203

1,503,965 $ 36,217,712

315,618 4,277,846 300,000 2,060,396 16,100,649 $ 24,504,980

2012

329,651 764,285

451,696

7,356,612 37,708,729 8,348 1,077,954

15,527

1,855,290 $ 48,022,460

390,979 5,431,542 1,960,290 16,785,630 $ 26,114,073

2013

290,550 772,510

435,073

1,349,568 11,652,509 13,049 1,126,029

20,086

1,793,015 $ 15,954,256

403,071 5,211,128 1,454,214 17,540,678 $ 26,107,224

2014

345,852 867,470

375,039

959,697 44,922,504 11,149 1,305,093

19,400

1,982,887 $ 49,200,730

420,476 4,920,337 2,106,552 18,293,530 $ 27,329,256

2015

Table III

176

EXPENDITURES: Current: General government Public safety Highways and streets Sanitation Health and welfare Culture and leisure services Airport Debt service: Principal retirement Interest and fiscal charges Total expenditures

Taxes: Ad valorem Sales Hotel/Motel Mixed beverage Other taxes Franchise fees Licenses and permits Intergovernmental Drainage fees Charges for services: Library fees Recreational entry fees Summit recreational fees Golf course revenues Swimming pool Lions Junction water park Sammons indoor pool Vital statistics Police revenue Contractual services - proprietary fund County fire protection Curb and street cuts Other Solid waste collection - residential Solid waste collection - commercial Solid waste collection - roll-off Temporary fuel surcharge Landfill contract Airport sales and rental Recreational services Fire department Subdivision fees Civic center & railroad museum revenues Fines Interest and other Total revenues

REVENUES:

10,388,342 22,407,229 6,417,838 5,764,373 236,520 9,482,059 3,305,438 4,026,314 2,554,604 $ 64,582,717

9,309,505 21,435,743 3,668,866 5,014,310 2,139,818 8,527,394 6,274,987 4,077,148 2,359,042 $ 62,806,813

43,295 168,358 460,064 931,270 87,268 229,874 250,619 2,564,022 1,084 32,043 116,099 2,721,927 2,556,689 2,305,986 1,222,563 2,388,479 376,134 19,804 17,788 230,271 1,890,845 4,516,612 62,338,556

43,363 158,834 448,170 891,829 80,480 194,531 246,981 2,415,086 1,389 27,092 131,421 2,437,511 2,371,563 1,119,593 92,569 2,097,627 2,412,574 278,963 8,219 22,789 195,551 1,811,931 3,516,112 60,508,714

2007

$ 14,749,272 14,933,628 1,029,398 96,724 52,539 5,855,401 419,367 1,432,542 638,591

2006

$ 13,835,799 13,934,218 1,028,787 89,878 53,087 5,562,043 424,378 3,940,238 636,108

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Last Ten Fiscal Years (modified accrual basis of accounting)

4,338,388 2,706,182 $ 75,520,617

12,486,714 23,983,300 9,932,915 5,516,414 620,472 12,211,783 3,724,449

48,070 171,812 469,840 1,017,243 93,160 228,691 466,471 2,815,038 1,353 36,925 115,091 2,832,858 2,639,211 2,203,748 1,296,510 3,175,668 537,091 11,812 20,533 249,930 1,985,417 3,662,986 65,407,004

$ 15,821,743 15,510,913 1,210,494 108,764 54,077 6,066,459 407,634 1,461,614 685,848

2008

4,332,453 3,314,077 $ 76,413,691

10,996,117 24,608,006 6,250,717 4,471,564 130,494 18,805,709 3,504,554

46,664 162,965 468,832 911,780 51,358 275,978 10,507 224,293 268,804 2,916,744 5,007 51,896 107,866 3,178,301 2,798,699 1,904,048 1,517,583 2,224,005 550,001 6,079 12,201 254,882 1,801,732 2,536,426 64,869,676

$ 16,741,749 15,238,812 1,067,836 106,387 54,198 6,373,864 333,085 1,685,144 981,950

2009

4,868,482 3,381,115 $ 75,498,637

11,408,326 28,959,139 4,435,722 5,188,280 238,743 11,865,596 5,153,234

37,678 168,238 624,394 788,981 30,016 270,067 60,445 174,537 277,769 2,965,786 2,058 42,658 173,520 3,572,061 2,842,700 2,016,329 1,614,027 2,311,344 728,785 10,981 17,975 298,504 1,883,604 1,884,590 68,273,430

4,772,004 3,244,597 $ 77,102,296

11,324,780 31,542,542 5,908,268 5,391,763 461,209 11,183,792 3,273,341

40,202 154,637 773,341 239,610 37,922 298,497 72,336 138,342 278,136 2,968,883 4,095 42,745 177,315 3,658,361 2,845,635 1,920,793 1,640,732 2,874,462 760,084 17,636 21,818 408,671 2,136,454 1,866,347 68,088,596

$ 17,647,927 16,125,862 1,215,396 123,581 70,191 6,216,239 448,076 1,847,522 1,016,748

Fiscal Year 2011

$ 17,617,718 15,134,138 1,104,894 106,418 55,751 6,152,141 323,817 3,982,232 999,274

2010

5,405,563 3,236,670 $ 77,044,539

11,703,131 27,628,257 9,204,905 5,056,524 205,125 10,978,275 3,626,089

35,829 136,498 751,824 1,017,595 33,169 259,976 82,530 124,135 228,156 3,063,081 3,988 69,762 183,078 3,731,899 2,844,135 1,894,753 1,674,726 3,037,702 819,626 11,964 15,648 402,293 2,133,078 1,700,329 70,858,551

$ 18,246,346 16,967,401 1,223,910 100,164 77,451 6,260,051 377,290 2,265,741 1,084,423

2012

5,110,646 4,797,337 $ 100,996,119

13,660,816 25,743,401 24,913,821 10,190,353 249,711 12,937,428 3,392,606

34,900 133,153 627,333 950,200 42,845 300,008 93,645 126,605 344,477 3,251,073 3,583 23,292 151,617 3,824,407 2,849,455 2,061,942 1,773,741 2,847,211 953,425 14,128 25,724 474,161 2,185,239 2,160,307 89,576,741

$ 19,164,488 18,017,575 1,306,256 110,409 80,817 6,178,547 738,449 17,629,564 1,098,165

2013

5,608,336 4,110,853 $ 115,223,193

15,223,119 28,225,738 29,731,928 9,923,731 308,783 12,078,707 10,011,998

32,498 126,845 526,310 874,917 48,030 298,690 91,705 120,542 629,586 3,480,132 1,341 38,732 159,130 4,041,272 2,902,758 2,314,814 1,963,924 2,732,476 1,028,223 20,620 24,727 533,266 2,438,908 2,581,670 89,242,742

$ 20,184,854 18,981,471 1,445,935 155,280 71,750 6,382,782 662,666 13,237,510 1,109,378

2014

5,821,194 4,540,888 $ 94,609,914 (continued)

15,445,404 31,013,726 17,506,619 5,177,927 102,069 12,361,459 2,640,628

32,118 120,588 486,234 789,908 48,870 351,788 91,330 124,847 1,602,266 3,702,807 4,630 62,195 301,443 4,169,597 2,945,727 2,216,659 1,971,203 2,294,963 1,034,161 34,758 18,465 508,062 2,086,676 1,728,607 79,908,200

$ 20,801,261 21,311,743 1,440,351 156,030 72,392 6,780,354 613,187 879,854 1,125,126

2015

Table IV

177

Capital Outlay

Debt service as a percentage of noncapital expenditures

NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES

OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES): Transfer in Transfer out Issuance of loans and bonds Original issue premium Discount on bond issuance Issuance of refunding bonds Issuance of debt Payment to refunded bond escrow agent Premium on bond issuance Claims settlement Attorney fees Total other financing sources (uses)

EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Last Ten Fiscal Years (modified accrual basis of accounting)

9,728,555

12.1%

1,251,901

3,780,514 (3,780,514) 3,550,000 3,550,000

(2,298,099)

2006

8,718,456

11.8%

8,291,817

2,123,769 (2,123,769) 10,635,000 (99,022) 10,535,978

$ (2,244,161)

2007

$ 11,703,515

11.0%

$ 13,532,134

2,261,777 (2,261,777) 23,180,000 (155,766) 621,513 23,645,747

$ (10,113,613)

2008

$ 16,423,100

12.7%

$ (11,278,644)

1,206,082 (1,206,082) 265,371 265,371

$ (11,544,015)

2009

$ 14,306,611

13.5%

$ 6,798,909

1,240,854 (1,240,854) 13,995,000 3,950,000 (3,926,713) 5,829 14,024,116

13.0%

(9,610,772)

1,042,837 (1,692,472) (68,241) 9,820,000 (9,903,444) 204,248 (597,072)

(9,013,700)

$ 15,437,565

Fiscal Year 2011

$ (7,225,207)

2010

1,330,355 (1,845,849) 30,445,000 (291,156) 9,290,000 (10,482,241) 5,154,623 33,600,732

(6,185,988)

6,873,201

12.3%

$ 27,414,744

2012

$ 15,122,317

11.5%

$ 13,413,841

8,112,971 (8,571,235) 19,775,000 385,580 (219,097) 7,250,000 (1,900,000) 24,833,219

$ (11,419,378)

2013

$ 20,442,125

10.3%

$ (32,075,053)

2,282,094 (2,327,620) 420,121 (88,929) 16,671,941 (23,052,209) (6,094,602)

$ (25,980,451)

2014

$ 15,920,233

13.2%

$ 34,468,506

1,888,658 (1,873,486) 46,360,000 3,275,997 (556,444) 7,544,558 (7,469,063) 49,170,220

$ (14,701,714)

2015

Table IV (continued)

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL TAX & FRANCHISE REVENUES BY SOURCE (1) Last Ten Fiscal Years (modified accrual basis of accounting)

(1)

Fiscal Year

General Property Tax

City Sales Tax

Hotel/ Motel Tax

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

$ 13,835,799 14,749,272 15,821,743 16,741,749 17,617,718 17,647,927 18,246,346 19,164,488 20,184,854 20,801,261

$ 13,934,218 14,933,628 15,510,913 15,238,812 15,134,138 16,125,862 16,967,401 18,017,575 18,981,471 21,311,743

$ 1,028,787 1,029,398 1,210,494 1,067,836 1,104,894 1,215,396 1,223,910 1,306,256 1,445,935 1,440,351

Table V

Mixed Beverage Tax $

Includes the General Fund tax revenues on a GAAP basis.

178

89,878 96,724 108,764 106,387 106,418 123,581 100,164 110,409 155,280 156,030

Other Tax $

53,087 52,539 54,077 54,198 55,751 70,191 77,451 80,817 71,750 72,392

Franchise Fee

Total

$ 5,562,043 5,855,401 6,066,459 6,373,864 6,152,141 6,216,239 6,260,051 6,178,547 6,382,782 6,780,354

$ 34,503,812 36,716,962 38,772,450 39,582,846 40,171,060 41,399,196 42,875,323 44,858,092 47,222,072 50,562,131

179

$ 2,593,605,161 2,776,793,922 3,010,380,513 3,236,662,897 3,328,646,073 3,360,739,695 3,489,946,100 3,571,566,347 3,691,482,902 4,173,699,490

$ 923,610,106 867,247,320 890,891,949 920,505,493 913,243,710 865,160,292 921,088,202 938,279,608 1,033,449,368 1,074,874,361

$ 30,044,127 32,245,657 34,753,485 34,032,591 36,416,466 39,920,753 40,788,663 39,981,995 39,934,752 39,043,656

Less: Productivity Loss $ 39,954,400 29,952,122 30,407,611 27,964,590 12,780,852 5,630,033 7,005,234 4,092,340 2,322,216 2,470,938

Less: Homestead Cap $ 829,300,032 839,553,516 857,950,357 864,617,679 842,391,021 849,088,073 915,915,243 931,868,067 940,324,968 1,027,167,363

Less: Tax-Exempt Property $ 2,617,916,708 2,742,289,947 2,978,161,009 3,230,553,530 3,350,301,444 3,331,261,128 3,447,325,162 3,533,903,553 3,742,350,334 4,179,891,894

Total Taxable Assessed Value $ 99,457,612 119,486,508 123,405,421 129,959,299 129,278,930 129,282,220 136,065,299 151,501,569 169,927,193 480,646,226

Less: Tax Increment District $ 77,181,631 -

Less: Applicable Adjustments 2

$ 2,441,277,465 2,622,803,439 2,854,755,588 3,100,594,231 3,221,022,514 3,201,978,908 3,311,259,863 3,382,401,984 3,572,423,141 3,699,245,668

Total Taxable Value 3 $

0.5745 0.5734 0.5681 0.5595 0.5646 0.5679 0.5679 0.5864 0.5864 0.5864

Total Direct Tax Rate

74.43% 75.25% 76.34% 77.71% 78.98% 78.83% 78.15% 78.36% 79.20% 79.64%

Assessed 1 Value as a Percentage of Actual Value

Table VI

- Includes tax-exempt property. - Adjustment accounts for correction of an error and a court ordered agreement. 3Net taxable value not adjusted for frozen values.

Note: Property is reassessed annually. The Tax Appraisal District of Bell County assesses property at approximately 100 percent of actual value for all types of real and personal property. Estimated actual value is calculated by dividing assessed value by those percentages. Tax rates are per $100 of assessed value.

Source: Property tax information - Tax Appraisal District of Bell County

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Fiscal Year 1

Estimated Market Value Real Personal Property Property

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS ASSESSED VALUE AND ESTIMATED ACTUAL VALUE OF TAXABLE PROPERTY Last Ten Fiscal Years (unaudited)

180

$ 0.3546 0.3395 0.3392 0.3322 0.3173 0.3300 0.3240 0.3300 0.3324 0.3300

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

$ 0.2199 0.2339 0.2289 0.2273 0.2473 0.2379 0.2439 0.2564 0.2540 0.2564

Debt Service $ 0.5745 0.5734 0.5681 0.5595 0.5646 0.5679 0.5679 0.5864 0.5864 0.5864

Total Direct Tax Rate $ 0.3465 0.3815 0.3795 0.3779 0.3759 0.3820 0.4096 0.4212 0.4212 0.4212

Bell County $

0.0295 0.0295 0.0295 0.0295 0.0295 0.0299 0.0299 0.0299 0.0299 0.0299

Bell County Road District $ 0.2054 0.2000 0.2180 0.2100 0.2100 0.2100 0.2054 0.2036 0.2036 0.2065

Temple College $

0.0294 0.0294 0.0309 0.0283 0.0306 0.0327 0.0327 0.0327 0.0327 0.0327

1.6300 1.4900 1.2401 1.2300 1.2100 1.2100 1.2850 1.2800 1.3600 1.3600

1.7185 1.6685 1.2870 1.4110 1.4110 1.4210 1.4060 1.5210 1.4500 1.4400

1.6725 1.5435 1.2681 1.5217 1.4030 1.3517 1.3517 1.3317 1.3317 1.3317

Overlapping Rates Elm Creek Temple Belton Troy Flood Control Independent Independent Independent District School District School District School District

Table VII

Source:

Uncollected taxes:

Penalty and interest:

Tax rate limit, City: Is limitation by statute or constitution? Do they include debt service? Tax due date: Discount allowed?

$ 1.20 Statute. Yes. January 31. Yes: October 31, 3%; November 30, 2%; December 31, 1%. 1.5% per month beginning on the first day of delinquency (February 1) until tax is 12 months delinquent, at which time a 1.0% per monthly penalty is assessed until taxes are paid. 1. Second notice mailed in March or April following due date. 2. Letter of intent to sue sent. 3. Tax suit filed. As ordered; not set by date. Tax Appraisal District of Bell County.

Overlapping rates are those of local and county governments that apply to property owners within the City of Temple. Not all overlapping rates apply to all City of Temple property owners (e.g. rates for special districts apply only to the proportion of the government's property owners whose property is located within the geographic boundaries of the special district). A property's location within the City limits will determine which school district's tax will be applicable for the property.

Notes: Statutes of the State of Texas (Article 1028) limit the maximum amount that a city can designate for debt service to $ 2.50 per $ 100 of assessed valuation. However, under City Charter, a limitation on taxes levied for general municipal operating purposes and for the purpose of paying interest and providing a proper sinking fund for paying the outstanding bonds and other obligations of the City, issued for municipal purposes, and any such future bonds or obligations which may be authorized, may not exceed $ 1.20 per $ 100 assessed valuation.

Source: Tax Appraisal District of Bell County

Operating

Fiscal Year

City of Temple

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS PROPERTY TAX RATES DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING 1 GOVERNMENTS Last Ten Fiscal Years

181 -

Coyote Temple Mall

Performance Food Group

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Rank

2015

25.48%

0.74%

8.65% 3.47% 2.75% 2.33% 1.93% 1.61% 1.56% 1.49% 0.95%

Percentage of Total Taxable Assessed Value

13,834,346

16,280,768

17,846,720

33,500,420

11,665,700

78,359,210 67,399,610 69,944,226 82,397,300 -

12,693,310 $ 403,921,610

Taxable Assessed 2 Value

2 4 3 1 -

Rank

2006

0.52% 16.08%

0.57%

0.67%

0.73%

1.37%

3.21% 2.76% 2.87% 3.38% -

Percentage of Total Taxable Assessed Value

Table VIII

Total taxable value including real and personal property for fiscal year 2015 is $ 3,699,245,668 (net taxable value not adjusted for frozen values). Total taxable value including real and personal property for fiscal year 2006 is $ 2,441,277,465 (net taxable value not adjusted for frozen values).

Source: Tax Appraisal District of Bell County

$ 942,472,904

Southwestern Bell Telephone Company

Tenneco Plastics Company Totals

26,986,775

$ 320,034,006 128,191,015 101,707,431 86,257,201 71,576,591 59,684,760 57,726,082 55,067,523 35,241,520

Taxable Assessed 1 Value

TXU Electric Delivery Company

BNSF Railway Company

Panda Temple Power, LLC McLane Company, Inc. Wal-Mart Distribution Center Pactiv Corporation Wilsonart International Sam's East, Inc. Oncor Electric Delivery Company H.E. Butt Grocery Reynolds Consumer Products, Inc.

Taxpayer

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS PRINCIPAL PROPERTY TAXPAYERS Current Year and Ten Years Ago

182

14,096,975 14,970,102 16,089,326 17,162,704 17,957,542 17,957,507 18,585,931 19,534,480 20,793,147 21,446,210

$ 14,096,975 14,970,102 16,089,326 17,162,704 17,957,542 17,957,507 18,585,931 19,534,480 20,793,147 21,446,210

Adjusted Taxes Levied for the Fiscal Year $ 13,792,514 14,705,740 15,783,170 16,794,390 17,582,962 17,538,771 18,276,652 19,295,759 20,295,608 21,046,789

97.84% 98.23% 98.10% 97.85% 97.91% 97.67% 98.34% 98.78% 97.61% 98.14%

Collected within the Tax Year of the Levy Amount % of Levy

- Collections from subsequent years restated to reflect collections net of refunds.

Adjustments to Levy in Subsequent Years

Source: Tax Appraisal District of Bell County

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Fiscal Year

Taxes Levied Within the Fiscal Year of the Levy

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS Last Ten Fiscal Years

152,349 116,468 132,923 132,950 143,734 157,718 134,413 86,109 44,440 -

Collections in Subsequent Years 1 $ 13,944,863 14,822,208 15,916,093 16,927,340 17,726,696 17,696,489 18,411,065 19,381,868 20,340,048 21,046,789

98.92% 99.01% 98.92% 98.63% 98.71% 98.55% 99.06% 99.22% 97.82% 98.14%

Total Collections to Date Amount % of Levy

Table IX

183

$ 898,872,242

$ 842,346,861

Total Taxable Sales

1.50% 0.50% 6.25% 8.25%

$ 829,059,048

239,215,347

589,843,701

$ 88,416,785 166,315,129 37,103,364 53,782,893 30,424,610 43,464,834 106,970,841 63,350,221 15,024

2007

1.50% 0.50% 6.25% 8.25%

$ 813,291,659

199,854,667

613,436,992

$ 89,613,352 175,596,330 39,420,176 55,042,952 28,783,684 44,804,031 112,977,388 66,585,331 613,748

2008

1.50% 0.50% 6.25% 8.25%

$ 769,977,786

179,375,190

590,602,596

1.50% 0.50% 6.25% 8.25%

$ 810,941,763

188,040,333

622,901,430

$ 88,576,484 170,470,503 49,113,761 58,364,792 24,857,770 45,981,591 118,255,769 67,267,029 13,731

Calendar Year 2009 2010 $ 82,462,311 164,686,634 41,712,916 57,044,251 24,779,772 39,113,284 113,463,147 67,017,206 323,075

Source: State of Texas Comptroller, City of Temple, and Bell County. Notes: Retail sales information is not available on a fiscal-year basis. 1 - General grocery items are not taxable; the sales tax applies only to prepared food items and nonfood items. 2 - In prior years erroneously reported Miscellaneous Retail in Non-Retail Sales category.

1.50% 0.50% 6.25% 8.25%

420,299,019

373,637,697

Total Non-Retail Sales

1.50% 0.50% 6.25% 8.25%

478,573,223

468,709,164

Total Retail Sales

Applicable Sales Tax Rates: City of Temple Bell County State of Texas TOTAL SALES TAX RATE

$ 71,437,840 129,664,014 47,944,503 29,640,807 23,396,775 45,858,144 88,975,925 41,634,298 20,917

2006

$ 65,724,599 130,038,434 47,494,054 28,048,074 25,462,014 38,358,643 89,864,655 43,706,477 12,214

2005

Building Material General Merchandise Stores Food Stores 1 Auto Dealers & Service Stations Apparel & Accessory Stores Furniture & Home Furnishings Eating & Drinking Places Miscellaneous Retail Nonstore Retailers

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS TAXABLE SALES BY CATEGORY Last Ten Calendar Years

1.50% 0.50% 6.25% 8.25%

$ 818,082,640

191,399,847

626,682,793

$ 87,314,928 170,797,914 56,881,719 59,241,754 25,852,811 40,458,746 123,216,814 62,914,213 3,894

2011

1.50% 0.50% 6.25% 8.25%

$ 877,980,048

201,318,871

676,661,177

$ 114,672,337 173,890,968 59,918,860 60,851,311 30,199,552 42,097,157 129,906,448 65,086,919 37,625

2012

1.50% 0.50% 6.25% 8.25%

$ 912,521,385

210,353,735

702,167,650

$ 125,260,898 175,654,007 62,771,429 62,511,559 31,759,721 40,792,351 134,804,234 68,545,563 67,888

2013

1.50% 0.50% 6.25% 8.25%

$ 960,030,640

235,550,282

724,480,358

$ 134,845,790 170,777,243 64,320,005 66,193,984 32,629,286 43,053,963 144,994,011 67,608,100 57,976

2014

Table X

184

$ 30,467,518 28,390,000 35,135,000

32,410,000 46,835,000 47,040,000 48,315,000 44,990,000 49,525,000 75,420,000

Fiscal Year

2006 2007 2008

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

31,525,000 27,400,000 23,625,000 17,160,000 30,150,000 20,830,000 36,650,000

$ 10,240,000 19,165,000 32,180,000

Certificates of Obligation Bonds

290,000 5,745,000 11,455,000 5,065,000 4,415,000

$ 1,115,000 850,000 575,000

Contractual Obligations

2,810,000 2,470,000 2,110,000 1,730,000 1,330,000 910,000 465,000

$ 3,550,000 3,440,000 3,135,000

Revenue Bonds

Governmental Activities

24,700,000 24,700,000 24,700,000 24,700,000

Pass-Through Revenue & Limited Tax Bonds

1,457,030 1,063,548 771,478 455,915 137,235 242,013 195,819

$ 1,736,305 1,872,509 1,534,112

Notes Payable $

14,150,000 32,390,000 31,230,000 36,480,000 39,000,000

682,482 -

General Obligation Bonds

Notes: Details regarding the City's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to the financial statements. - See the Schedule of Demographic and Economic Statistics on page 189 for personal income and population data. (Table XVI)

General Obligation Bonds

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS RATIOS OF OUTSTANDING DEBT BY TYPE Last Ten Fiscal Years

60,125,000 73,885,000 56,770,000 34,110,000 30,700,000 35,120,000 52,855,000

32,320,000 51,095,000 63,395,000 -

$ 1,505,000 -

Business-Type Activities Water & Sewer Revenue Contractual Bonds Obligations

398,055 302,959 204,974 104,018 -

$ 666,874 579,932 490,352

Notes Payable

129,015,085 151,956,507 144,671,452 164,709,933 174,692,235 172,872,013 233,700,819

$ 82,283,179 105,392,441 136,444,464

Total Primary Government

37,106 37,917 38,174 39,971 38,852 38,228 39,017

$ 30,132 32,812 35,255

Personal Income 1 $

2,031 2,299 2,158 2,411 2,486 2,409 3,184

1,360 1,707 2,173

Per Capita 1

Table XI

185

$ 31,150,000 28,390,000 35,135,000 32,410,000

46,835,000 61,190,000 80,705,000 76,220,000

86,005,000

114,420,000

2006 2007 2008 2009

2010 2011 2012 2013

2014

2015

36,650,000

20,830,000

27,400,000 23,625,000 17,160,000 30,150,000

$ 10,240,000 19,165,000 32,180,000 31,525,000

Certificates of Obligation Bonds $

4,415,000

5,065,000

5,745,000 11,455,000

1,115,000 850,000 575,000 290,000

465,000

910,000

2,470,000 2,110,000 1,730,000 1,330,000

3,550,000 3,440,000 3,135,000 2,810,000

24,700,000

24,700,000 24,700,000

- See the Schedule of Assessed Value and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property on page 179 for property value data. (Table VI) - Population data can be found in the Schedule of Demographic and Economic Statistics on page 189. (Table XVI)

- Amounts reported include governmental and business type general obligation bonds.

195,819

242,013

1,063,548 771,478 455,915 137,235

1,736,305 1,872,509 1,534,112 1,457,030

Notes Payable

Notes: Details regarding the City's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to the financial statements.

General Obligation Bonds 1

Fiscal Year

General Bonded Debt Outstanding Pass-Through Contractual Revenue Revenue & Obligations Bonds Limited Tax Bonds

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS RATIOS OF NET GENERAL BONDED DEBT OUTSTANDING Last Ten Fiscal Years

180,845,819

137,752,013

77,768,548 87,696,478 130,495,915 143,992,235

47,791,305 53,717,509 72,559,112 68,492,030

Total General Bonded Debt Outstanding $

959,697

1,349,568

1,758,817 1,364,049 2,960,522 7,356,612

644,563 1,130,345 1,744,532 1,538,432

179,886,122

136,402,445

76,009,731 86,332,429 127,535,393 136,635,623

$ 47,146,742 52,587,164 70,814,580 66,953,598

79.64%

79.20%

78.98% 78.83% 78.15% 78.36%

74.43% 75.25% 76.34% 77.71%

% of Estimated Less: Amounts Total General Actual Taxable Available in Debt Net Bonded Debt Value 2 of Service Fund Outstanding Property $

2,450

1,901

1,150 1,288 1,867 1,944

779 852 1,128 1,054

Per Capita 3

Table XII

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES DEBT September 30, 2015

Governmental Unit Direct Debt: City of Temple Reinvestment Zone No. 1 2

Net General Obligation Bonded Debt Outstanding 1

$ Total direct debt

Overlapping Debt: Temple Independent School District Temple College Bell County Belton Independent School District Troy Independent School District Total estimated overlapping debt Total direct and overlapping debt

Table XIII

Percentage Applicable to City of Temple

179,886,122 47,615,000 227,501,122

100.00% 100.00%

80,375,000 20,450,000 136,375,000 126,359,996 17,610,011 381,170,007 608,671,129

94.51% 100.00% 25.53% 24.09% 7.65%

Amount Applicable to City of Temple

179,886,122 47,615,000 227,501,122

75,962,413 20,450,000 34,816,538 30,440,123 1,347,166 163,016,240 390,517,362

Sources: Finance departments of respective entities. Notes: Overlapping governments are those that coincide, at least in part, with the geographic boundaries of the City. This schedule estimates the portion of the outstanding debt of those overlapping governments that is borne by the residents and businesses of the City of Temple. This process recognizes that, when considering the City's ability to issue and repay long-term debt, the entire debt burden borne by the residents and businesses should be taken into account. However, this does not imply that every taxpayer is a resident -- and therefore responsible for repaying the debt -- of each overlapping government. 1 - For debt repaid with property taxes, the percentage of overlapping debt applicable is estimated using taxable assessed property values. Applicable percentages were estimated by determining the portion of another governmental unit's taxable assessed value that is within the City's boundaries and dividing it by each unit's total taxable assessed value. 2 - Debt is secured by pledged property taxes attributable to incremental growth in real property within the Zone. Bell County, Temple I.S.D., Belton I.S.D., Troy I.S.D. and Temple College each participate in the Zone.

186

187 18.92%

$ 23,752,605

(5,542,725)

$ 29,295,330

20.26%

22,757,834

(5,780,876)

28,538,710

18.47%

25,402,831

(5,756,359)

31,159,190

2008

20.13%

26,761,352

(6,744,944)

33,506,296

2009

19.90%

27,857,560

(6,921,079) $

20.72%

27,331,064

(7,144,451)

34,475,515

Fiscal Year 2011

34,778,639

2010

21.28%

28,106,133

(7,597,902)

35,704,035

2012

- Net taxable value adjusted for frozen taxable value. Frozen taxable value is not included in debt service calculation.

Total net debt applicable to the limit as a percentage of debt service limit

Legal debt margin

Total net debt applicable to limit

Debt service limit

2006

2007

Actual amount expended by debt Service fund for general obligation debt service during the year ended September 30, 2015

Legal debt service limit

Assessed value 2014/2015 tax roll 1 Limit on amount designated for debt service per $ 100 assessed valuation ($ 3,330,386,005 / $ 100 = $ 33,303,860)

Legal Debt Margin

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS COMPUTATION OF LEGAL DEBT MARGIN Last Ten Fiscal Years

24.50%

27,405,938

(8,893,165)

36,299,104

2013

23.38%

29,689,945

(9,057,343)

38,747,288

2014

$ 1.20

21.74%

31,277,456

(8,687,176)

39,964,632

2015

31,277,456

(8,687,176)

39,964,632

Legal Debt Margin Calculation for Fiscal Year 2015 $ 33,303,860

Table XIV

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS PLEDGED-REVENUE COVERAGE Last Ten Fiscal Years

Fiscal Year

Gross Revenue 1

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

$ 23,429,834 22,748,591 25,656,629 27,625,658 26,072,200 29,513,930 29,078,891 30,619,249 31,670,491 31,110,346

Fiscal Year

Gross Revenue 1

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

$ 22,748,591 25,656,629 27,625,658 26,072,200 29,513,930 29,078,891 30,619,249 31,670,491 31,110,346

Table XV

Water Revenue Bonds Less: Net Average Operating Available Annual 2 Expenses Debt Service 3 Revenue $ 12,818,521 13,454,119 14,967,382 16,455,192 17,037,596 16,271,594 16,753,197 17,505,732 18,216,001 18,124,858

$ 10,611,313 9,294,472 10,689,247 11,170,466 9,034,604 13,242,336 12,325,694 13,113,517 13,454,490 12,985,488

$ 2,799,622 3,982,479 4,697,031 4,686,147 5,352,275 5,275,264 5,104,498 4,990,904 3,453,040 4,600,597

Water Revenue Bonds Less: Net Maximum Operating Available Annual Expenses 2 Debt Service 4 Revenue $ 13,454,119 14,967,382 16,455,192 17,037,596 16,271,594 16,753,197 17,505,732 18,216,001 18,124,858

$ 9,294,472 10,689,247 11,170,466 9,034,604 13,242,336 12,325,694 13,113,517 13,454,490 12,985,488

$ 3,496,500 4,677,725 4,677,625 5,792,125 5,792,125 3,158,581 3,158,581 3,989,972 4,661,879

Coverage 3.79 2.33 2.28 2.38 1.69 2.51 2.41 2.63 3.90 2.82

Coverage 2.66 2.29 2.39 1.56 2.29 3.90 4.15 3.37 2.79

Notes: Details regarding the City's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to the financial section. Operating expenses do not include interest, depreciation, or amortization expenses. - Gross revenues (as defined by revenue bond covenants) includes all income of the water and sewer system including interest income and noncash contributions of capital. 1

- Total operating expense less depreciation.

- Includes Revenue Debt and 1993 Combination Tax & Revenue Debt for fiscal years 1995 2003. Includes Revenue Debt and 2003 General Obligation Refunding & Improvement Debt for fiscal years beginning in 2004 through 2006. Includes 2006 Utility Revenue Bonds for fiscal years beginning in 2007, plus 2008 Utility Revenue Bonds for fiscal years beginning in 2009, plus 2010 Utility Revenue Bonds for fiscal years beginning in 2010, plus 2014 Utility Revenue Bonds for fiscal years beginning in 2014. 3

- FY 2007 is the first year of the new Junior Lien Master Ordinance requiring calculation of the Junior Lien Debt coverage based on the greater of 1.25 times the average annual debt service requirements or 1.10 times the maximum annual debt service requirements. Maximum annual debt service only includes the 2006 Utility Revenue Bonds for FY 2007, plus 2008 Utility Revenue Bonds for fiscal years beginning in 2009, plus 2010 Utility Revenue Bonds for fiscal years beginning in 2010.

188

189

60,518 61,755 62,790 63,524 66,102 67,036 68,315 70,274 71,761 73,408

2006 2007 2008 2009

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

2,506,389,534 2,559,032,264 2,730,618,865 2,730,285,448 2,743,279,508 2,864,159,936

$ 1,823,528,376 2,026,305,060 2,213,661,450 2,357,121,544

Personal Income 2 $

37,917 38,174 39,971 38,852 38,228 39,017

30,132 32,812 35,255 37,106

Per Capita Personal Income 3

34.6 34.6 34.6 34.6 34.6 34.6

35.2 35.2 35.2 35.2

Median Age 4

8,981 8,953 8,850 8,749 8,509 8,635

8,095 8,359 8,499 8,629

School Enrollment 5

6.48 6.67 5.83 5.43 4.67 3.77

4.07 3.75 4.04 5.93

Unemployment Rate 6

Table XVI

- Calculating Personal Income based on Per Capita Personal Income and estimated population.

- School enrollment (for public schools in Temple) provided by Temple Independent School District.

- Unemployment rates provided on the Texas Workforce Commission website. This includes updates to prior years as they are updated by the Texas Workforce Commission.

- Median age of 35.2 provided in 2000 Census and 34.6 provided in the 2010 Census.

- Per Capita Income provided by Metropolitan Area publication on the U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Economic Analysis website (2007-2010). Based on most recent data available which will lag one year behind. This includes updates to prior years as they are updated by the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

- 2002 thru 2009 population is based on new residential water customers multiplied by 2000 Census data of average household size of 2.44. 2010 population is based on the 2010 Census and 2011 population is based on new residential water customers multiplied by 2010 Census data of average household size of 2.47.

Source: 2010 population based on 2010 Bureau of Census report.

Population

Calendar Year

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC STATISTICS Last Ten Calendar Years

190

- Source: - Source: 3 - Source: 4 - Source:

Temple Economic Development Corporation Texas Workforce Commission website Temple Chamber of Commerce Texas Workforce Commission website

Totals

Scott & White Hospital Central Texas Veterans Healthcare Systems McLane Company - Corporation Headquarters & SW Distribution Center Wal-Mart Superstore, Distribution Center and Sam's Club Temple Independent School District Wilsonart International City of Temple Sprint/Nextel Communications PACTIV Packaging Corporation H-E-B Retail Distribution Center King's Daughters Hospital and Clinic

Employer

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS PRINCIPAL EMPLOYERS Current Year and Ten Years Ago

18,368

8,682 2,407 1,497 1,194 1,071 895 837 685 600 500 -

Employees 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -

Rank

FY 2015

58.14%

27.48% 7.62% 4.74% 3.78% 3.39% 2.83% 2.65% 2.17% 1.90% 1.58% -

Percentage of Total City Employment 2

16,886

5,500 2,753 1,549 660 1,368 1,685 637 1,000 1,046 688

Employees 3

1 2 4 9 5 3 10 7 6 8

Rank

FY 2006

62.10%

20.22% 10.12% 5.70% 2.43% 5.03% 6.20% 2.34% 3.68% 3.85% 0.00% 2.53%

Percentage of Total City Employment 4

Table XVII

191

Health and welfare -

Sanitation 74 & 98:

Highways and streets -

Public safety -

General government -

Function/Program

Community development projects/grants 15, 20, 21 & 53 Total health and welfare

Engineering 6, 7, 13, 30, 31, 45, 63, 64, 72, 81 & 112 Drainage 6, 29, 32, 45, 47, 63, 103 & 116 Street 13, 18, 28 & 73 Traffic signals 29 & 97 Total highway and streets

Fire 4, 27, 43 & 95 Municipal court 3 & 13 Police 3, 13, 17, 26, 44, 71 & 96 Total public safety

Code enforcement

Animal control 42

5, 22, 41, 60, 62, 69, 94 & 111

Assistant city manager 66 & 85 City council City manager 1, 14, 20, 38, 58, 66 & 104 City secretary 59, 86 & 105 Facility services 13, 25, 39, 60, 61, 67 & 87 Finance 15, 21 & 53 Fleet services 40 & 68 General services 38, 54, 65, 85, 88 & 106 Human resources 23 & 107 Information technology services 2 , 13, 14, 16, 55, 80, 89 & 108 Inspections/Permits 62, 70, 90 & 92 Legal 83 & 91 13, 22, 41, 93 & 109 Planning Permits 62 & 90 Purchasing 110 Total general government

41.26

5.00 8.83 22.00 3.00 38.83

6.50 11.50 103.00 13.03 156.63 290.66

5.00 4.73 4.50 15.00 9.75 16.00 5.63 20.00 5.63 6.45 5.00 97.69

2006

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT CITY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES BY FUNCTION/PROGRAM Last Ten Fiscal Years

41.26

8.40 12.43 21.00 3.00 44.83

6.50 12.50 103.00 13.03 155.98 291.01

5.00 4.38 4.63 15.00 10.75 16.00 6.00 19.00 6.13 6.33 5.00 98.22

2007

42.26

10.40 12.43 21.00 3.00 46.83

6.50 14.50 103.00 13.53 155.98 293.51

5.00 4.38 4.63 15.00 10.75 16.00 6.00 17.50 7.13 6.33 5.00 97.72

2008

42.46

8.80 11.58 20.75 3.00 44.13

6.50 14.50 107.00 12.03 157.50 297.53

5.00 6.00 4.63 15.00 11.00 16.10 6.00 17.50 6.63 6.45 5.00 99.31

2009

42.42

8.35 11.83 20.15 3.55 43.88

6.50 13.50 112.00 12.03 157.50 301.53

5.00 6.00 4.63 16.70 11.00 16.10 6.00 17.50 6.63 6.45 5.00 101.01

0.50 0.50

42.42

8.35 11.83 25.15 3.55 48.88

6.50 13.50 112.00 12.03 158.50 302.53

5.00 8.00 4.63 16.70 10.50 16.10 6.00 16.50 6.63 6.45 5.00 101.51

Fiscal Year 2010 2011

1.25 1.25

42.22

6.95 12.98 25.00 3.50 48.43

6.50 14.00 115.00 12.03 160.50 308.03

5.00 6.75 4.63 14.68 11.00 16.00 5.00 16.50 6.63 5.95 5.00 97.14

2012

0.75 0.75

42.22

6.95 13.98 24.00 3.50 48.43

7.50 14.00 118.00 12.03 161.50 313.03

5.00 6.00 4.63 15.02 11.00 17.00 2.25 5.00 15.50 6.63 6.95 5.00 99.98

2013

0.75 0.75

43.22

7.95 14.23 23.50 3.75 49.43

7.50 7.00 118.00 12.03 164.50 309.03

2.00 5.00 4.00 4.63 15.45 11.00 18.00 4.25 5.00 16.50 4.00 7.00 6.45 3.50 5.00 111.78

2014

0.65 0.65 (continued)

47.22

8.95 17.23 23.50 4.75 54.43

7.50 9.00 121.00 12.03 170.50 320.03

2.00 5.00 6.00 5.00 15.45 11.00 18.00 3.35 5.00 18.00 4.00 9.00 8.00 3.00 7.00 119.80

2015

Table XVIII

192

710.94

719.43

81.13

12.88

27.00 41.83 30.23 15.58 35.46 150.10

2007

733.83

89.13

14.38

27.00 41.83 30.13 15.58 35.46 150.00

2008

741.81

89.53

14.38

27.00 45.10 29.79 15.58 37.00 154.47

2009

759.50

90.43

14.38

17.87 63.06 28.66 12.70 36.53 5.75 1.28 165.85

763.45

90.43

14.38

15.77 62.27 28.65 12.70 36.06 5.75 1.60 162.80

Fiscal Year 2010 2011

773.63

91.18

14.38

18.13 66.46 28.65 13.40 37.01 5.75 1.60 171.00

2012

787.33

92.18

14.38

18.13 68.54 28.15 13.40 36.01 6.23 4.05 1.85 176.36

2013

793.64

89.19

14.38

19.16 64.26 28.15 14.40 36.41 6.75 4.88 1.85 175.86

2014

820.54

88.19

13.38

19.16 65.24 28.15 15.40 35.41 6.75 4.88 1.85 176.84

2015

Table XVIII (Continued)

- An Assistant to City Manager position was added during FY 07-08 as part of the City Manager Reorganization Plan. In addition, two Administrative Assistant II positions were added, one of these positions is 25% funded by Public Education Government Access Channel (PEG). One Administrative Assistant II position is a reclassification of the Executive Assistant position. 2 - In FY 07-08, two GIS Specialist positions were transferred to Engineering as part of the Public Works Reorganization- Phase II. A Communication Specialist position was added during FY 0607, partially funded with the budgeted funds for the part-time Audio/Video Tech position and the remaining balance to be funded from the Public Education Government Access Channel (PEG) restricted funds. 3 - In FY 08-09, the Parking Enforcement Official position was transferred from Municipal Court to the Police Department. In addition, the Facility Attendant at the Police Department was reclassified from a part-time to a full-time position. 4 - In FY 08-09, the SAFER Grant was awarded to the City to hire four Fire Control Rescue Officers (FCRO) as part of a plan to hire a total of 12 FCRO's for the new Fire Station # 8 that was completed in March 2011. In FY 09-10, the City was awarded the SAFER Grant to hire an additional four Fire Control Rescue Officers. 5 - In FY 07-08, added one additional Code Enforcement Officer and a Plans Examiner/Inspector position. 6 - During FY 07-08, the Public Works Reorganization was implemented to include transferring of positions between departments, changing titles, and splitting positions between funds to allocate positions based on function. 7 - In FY 08-09, the percentage allocation of personnel positions based on function changed. 8 - In FY 08-09, the Parks & Facilities Maintenance Superintendent was transferred from Recreation to the Parks Department. In addition, positions were reclassified, added, and lump sum funding added due to the opening of the Family Aquatic Center and Indoor Pool; added part-time funding for enhancements to the After School Program. 9 - In FY 09-10, new division was created. 10 - In February 2005, the City of Temple began operating the Sammons Park Golf Course. 11 - In FY 04-05, the City entered into an agreement with the Railroad and Pioneer Museum of Temple, Texas ("The Foundation") to lease the Santa Fe Depot to the Foundation and to transfer responsibility for maintenance and operation of the City's Railroad and Heritage Museum and the assets of the Museum from the City to the Foundation. 12 - In FY 07-08, Public Works added Crew Leader-Sewer Collection, Senior Utility Technician, Utility Technician II, and Utility Technician I positions to implement the Construction Crew for Sewer (continued) Line Repair/Replacement (referred to as the In-House Sewer Crew).

Source: City Budget Office

Totals

81.88

Water and sewer: 6, 12, 24, 29, 30, 37, 45, 46, 51, 57, 63, 64, 78, 79, 82, 84, 101, 113, 114, 115 & 117

26.40 39.91 30.39 15.58 35.46 147.74 12.88

Golf course 10, 13, 16, 19, 25, 35, 36 & 75 Recreation 8, 16, 33, 49, 50 & 99 Library 13 & 48 Mayborn center 36 & 102 Parks 8, 13, 16, 32, 34, 60 & 111 Parks & recreation administration services 9, 56 & 76 Railroad museum 11 & 77 Tourism/Marketing 9 & 52 Total cultural and leisure services

2006

Airport 100:

Cultural and leisure services -

Function/Program

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT CITY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES BY FUNCTION/PROGRAM Last Ten Fiscal Years

193

Table XVIII (Continued)

- One Animal Control Officer position added in FY 12-13. - On June 27, 2011, the Civil Service Commission approved changing the title of the Fire Control & Rescue Officer (FCRO) to Firefighter. Three Firefighter positions were added in FY 12-13. 44 - Two Police Officer positions were added to the Investigations Unit in FY 12-13. One Community Service/Records Tech. I position is not authorized in FY 12-13. 45 - One GIS Specialist position was unfrozen in FY 12-13 and reclassified as a GPS Assessment Field Collection Technician position. Position is funded 40% in General Fund-Engineering, 40 % (continued) in Water & Wastewater Fund-Public Works Administration and 20% in Drainage Fund.

- 0.05 FTE of a Maintenance Worker position is budgeted in the Summit Fitness and Recreation Center. - These FTE's account for positions from Facility Services and Parks for maintenance and janitorial services provided for the Summit Fitness and Recreation Center. In FY 11-12 adjusted parttime positions to actual. 35 - In FY 11-12, reclassified Crew Leader position to Assistant Golf Course Superintendent. 36 - Additional part-time funding will be added in FY 2012 to accommodate services for the increase in booking of events. 37 - These divisions have position(s) that are authorized but unfunded in FY 2012 - see division budget for more details. 38 - In FY 12-13, the Administrative Services Division was created and the Director of Administrative Services position was transferred from the City Manager's budget. 39 - One Facility Attendant/Custodian position was an authorized position but was unfunded in FY 09-10, FY 10-11, and FY 11-12. This position was funded in FY 12-13. 40 - Eliminated one Lead Automotive Technician position and added two Automotive Technician II positions for FY 11-12. 41 - In FY 12-13, a Development Coordinator position was added. This position was funded with increased permit fees, in addition, the Director of Community Services position was retired to Director of Planning and the Director of Planning position was reclassified to an Assistant Director of Planning position. The Director of Planning was funded 50% in Planning and 50% in Construction Safety.

- In FY 09-10, division has position(s) that are authorized but unfunded. - In FY 10-11, Communication Specialist position transferred to City Manager from Information Technology Services 15 - In FY 10-11, the Accounting Clerk position was funded 56% in General Fund and 44% with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG). 16 - In FY 10-11, positions were authorized but unfunded. 17 - In July 2009, Council approved an additional Police Officer position for the TISD Grant. 18 - In FY 10-11, the budget included the addition of one Crew Leader and four Maintenance Worker positions to implement a Crack Sealing Program. 19 - In FY 10-11, the reduction of staff was due to renovation project. 20 - In FY 11-12, the City Manager's Office was reorganized to eliminate the Assistant to the City Manager and one Administrative Assistant II position and add a Director of Administrative Services and an Executive Assistant II position. 25% of the Director of Administrative Services position was funded in the Federal/State Grant Fund. 21 - In FY 11-12, an Accounting Clerk position transferred to the Federal/State Grant Fund. An additional Accounting Clerk position was funded in the General Fund. The Budget Analyst position was reclassified to a Senior Accountant. The Accounting Clerk position was eliminated and an Accountant position was added. 22 - In FY 11-12, Director of Community Services position was funded 50% in Planning and 50% in Construction Safety. 23 - In FY 11-12, City Health Doctor position eliminated 24 - In FY 11-12, Assistant Director of Public Works-Operations position was eliminated as a result of a reorganization of Public Works. 25 - In FY 11-12, 0.3 FTE of the Maintenance Worker positions and 1.92 FTE's of the Facility Attendant/Custodian positions budgeted in Leisure Services and Golf Course. Part-time Facility Attendant/Custodian position reclassified to a full-time position. 26 - In FY 11-12, two Police Officer positions added. 27 - In FY 11-12, three Captain positions added and three Fire Control Rescue Officer positions reclassified to Driver positions. 28 In FY 11-12, Construction Supervisor and Maintenance Supervisor - Street/Signs positions changed to Street Services Foreman positions as a result of Public Works reorganization. During FY 2011, the Director of Public Works and Assistant Director of Public Works position allocations were changed. All General Fund portions are now charged to Engineering. 29 - In FY 11-12, the Public Works reorganization included changes in position allocations. 30 - In FY 11-12, the CIP Project Manager position was reclassified as a Project Engineer. 31 - In FY 11-12 Assistant City Engineer position was unfrozen and the Mapping & Records Supervisor position was reclassified to a PW Mapping & Technology Manager during FY 2011 as a result of a reorganization of Public Works. During FY 2011, the reorganization included changes in position allocations. 32 - In FY 11-12, City Council authorized a TxDOT Mowing/Drainage Crew. Council approved entering into an agreement with TxDOT to mow their ROW's in Temple in-house. The crew is to be utilized by Parks for mowing approximately 6 months of the year and then utilize the crew to clean the city storm drain inlets for the remaining 6 months. 50% of funding from General Fund and 50% funding from Drainage.

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT CITY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES BY FUNCTION/PROGRAM Last Ten Fiscal Years

194

Table XVIII (Continued)

- One Equipment Operator I and one Equipment Operator II position that were authorized but unfunded in FY 09-10, FY 10-11 and FY 11-12 were both funded in FY 12-13. - In FY 12-13, the Street Sweeping program transferred to the Drainage Fund. 48 - Part-time Circulation Technician position (.5 FTE) that was authorized but unfunded in FY 09-10, FY 10-11 and FY 11-12 was funded in FY 12-13. The vacant part-time Facility Attendant/Custodian was eliminated in FY 12-13. 49 - Reclassified a part-time Recreation Leader II position to full-time and added Extra-Help Season part-time funding for Adult Athletics and Lion's Junctions Water Park. 50 - One Program Coordinator position that was authorized but unfunded in FY 09-10, FY 10-11 and FY 11-12 was funded in FY 12-13. 51 - Added three Maintenance Laborers and one Maintenance Technician I position in FY 2013. 52 - In FY 2013, reclassified a part-time Office Assistant II position to full-time. 53 - In FY 2012, re-titled Accounting Clerk to Grants Specialist. In FY 2013, 50% of Grants Specialist position will be funded in the Administrative Services division in the General Fund and 50% will be funded in the CDBG budget. 54 - Grant funding for the Sustainability and Grant Manager position ended in October 2012. At that time, this position transferred to the Administrative Services division in the General Fund. 55 - Administrative Assistant II position not authorized in FY 2013 56 - Wellness Program transferred from Human Resources to Parks & Leisure Services in FY 2013. Part-time Health & Wellness Coordinator position added. 57 - Change in distribution only, no change in the number of FTEs. 58 - During FY 2013, the Management Assistant position was retitled to Executive Assistant to the City Manager. 59 - During FY 2013, the Records Technician position was reclassified to a Records Specialist position. 60 - During FY 2013, supervision of the Facility Services division transferred from PALS to Administrative Services. The Asst Director of Parks & Leisure Services and Park Planning & Construction Superintendent positions are now 100% funded in the Parks Division. 61 - In June 2013, the janitorial services for the Summit Fitness & Recreation Center was contracted out. A vacant Facility Attendant/Custodian position was eliminated to fund this contract. 62 - During FY 2013, Planning and Construction Safety underwent a reorganization. The reorganization included splitting Construction Safety into three new divisions: Inspections, Permits and Code Enforcement. The Director of Planning will now be 100% funded in Planning. The Development Coordinator, Permit Assistants, and the part-time position will be transferred to the Permits division. The Chief Building Official, three Building Inspector positions and one Administrative Assistant I (frozen, unfunded) position will be transferred to the Inspection division. As part of the reorganization plan, a Code Enforcement Officer position was eliminated and a Code Enforcement Manager position was added. 63 - Unfroze GIS Specialist in FY 2013 and reclassified as a GPS Assessment Field Collection Technician position. This position is funded 40% in General Fund - Engineering, 40% in Water & Wastewater Fund - Public Works Admin and 20% in Drainage Fund. 64 - During FY 2013, the Assistant Director of Public Works - City Engineer position was changed to a City Engineer position. 65 - In FY 2014, a Management Analyst position was added. 66 - In FY 2014, the Assistant City Manager division was added and the Assistant City Manager and Administrative Assistant II positions were transferred from the City Manager's budget to the new division. 67 - In FY 2014, a Building Maintenance Worker position was added. 68 - In FY 2014 a Fleet Services Foreman position will be added for a succession plan. The Fleet Services Asst. Director position will be eliminated once the succession takes place. 69 - In FY 2014, a new Code Enforcement Officer position was authorized as part of the East Temple Redevelopment. 70 - In FY 2014, the Administrative Assistant I position is not authorized. 71 - Two Police Officer positions will be added to the Patrol Unit in FY 2014, as well as, implementation of the Civil Service Compensation Study. The Compensation Study includes changes to rank structure. 72 - In FY 2014, a CIP R.O.W. Agent position was authorized. This position is to be funded with bond funds. 73 - In FY 2014, a Street Services Foreman position was reclassified to a Street & Drainage Services Asst. Director position. 74 - In FY 2014, the Recycling Attendant position was reclassified to a Recycling Assistant. In addition, a Recycling Coordinator position was added due to the implementation of the Curbside Recycling Program. 75 - In FY 2014, an Assistant Golf Professional position will be added. This position is offset by a reduction in part-time $'s and an increase in revenues due to increased sales from the addition of the position. 76 - In FY 2014, the Recreation Specialist position for the Wellness Program was reclassified from a part-time to a full-time position. 77 (continued) - In FY 2014, added a part-time Office Assistant II.

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT CITY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES BY FUNCTION/PROGRAM Last Ten Fiscal Years

195

102

- In FY 2015, an Assistant Lab Technician, Solids Operator, Instrument Technician and Maintenance Technician I positions was reclassified to Operator positions. - In FY 2015, a Food & Beverage Specialist position was added. 103 - In FY 2015, one Equipment Operator I position, one Equipment Operator II position and one Crew Leader position were added. 104 - During FY 2015, the Transformation Agent - Lead and Transformation Agent positions were added. 105 - During FY 2015, the Records Assistant position was reclassified to an Administrative Assistant III position. 106 - During FY 2015, the Sustainability & Grant Manager position was eliminated. 107 - During FY 2015, the Assistant Director of Human Resources and Benefits Specialist positions were reclassified to HR Generalist positions. The Human Resources Specialist and Compensation Specialist positions were reclassified to HR Technician positions. 108 - During FY 2015, the Computer Operator position was eliminated and the Information Technology Specialist position was added. 109 - During FY 2015, the Development Coordinator position was transferred to the Planning Department. 110 - During FY 2015, the Senior Buyer and the Senior Buyer II positions were added. The Senior Buyer II position is funded with Bond Funds. 111 - During FY 2015, a Maintenance Worker position was transferred from Parks to Code Enforcement. 112 - During FY 2015, the Assistant City Engineer position was reclassified to Deputy City Engineer. The CIP - Project Engineer - EIT was retitled to Project Manager during FY 2015. 113 - During FY 2015, the Utility Director position was transferred from the Water Treatment Plant. 114 - During FY 2015, the Utility Services Director position was eliminated and the Assistant Utility Services Director position was renamed to Utility Manager.

101

- During FY 2014, the remaining three Meter Reader positions were eliminated as the final phase to outsourcing meter reading. - During FY 2014, an Assistant Director Water Production position was created and a Maintenance Laborer position was eliminated. 80 - During FY 2014, a Systems Analyst position was added. 81 - During FY 2014, one Project Engineer position was reclassified to a CIP Project Manager - EIT position. 82 - During FY 2014, the Administrative Assistant I position was eliminated and a Customer Service Rep II position was added. 83 - In FY 2014, the part-time Office Assistant I position was reclassified to full-time. 84 - During FY 2014, an Assistant Director Water Production position was created and a Maintenance Laborer position was eliminated. 85 - During FY 2015, the Administrative Assistant II position was reclassified to a Transformation Coordinator position. 86 - In FY 2015, the Records Assistant position was reclassified to full time. The position is funded 50% with restricted revenues and 50% from the General Fund. 87 - In FY 2015, three Facility Attendant/Custodian positions were reclassified to Crew Leader positions. 88 - In FY 2015, the Administrative Services division was retitled to General Services division. The Director of Administrative Services was retitled to General Services Director and funded 100% in this division. 85% of the Sustainability & Grant Manager position is now funded in the General Services division and 15% funded in the CDBG budget. 89 - In FY 2015, a Systems Analyst position and a Network Analyst position was added and a part-time Systems Analyst position was eliminated. 90 - In FY 2015, Permits and Inspections merged into one department - Inspections/Permits. In addition, three Building Inspector positions were reclassified to a new Combination Building Inspector position. 91 - In FY 2015, one Deputy City Attorney position was reclassified to a First Assistant City Attorney position. 92 - In FY 2015, the Permit Assistant - PT position was reclassified to a full-time Permit Supervisor. 93 - In FY 2015, the Planning Intern position was reclassified to a full-time Planning Technician position. 94 - In FY 2015, an Equipment Operator position was added. 95 - In FY 2015, three Firefighter positions were added. 96 - In FY 2015, six Corporal positions were added in FY 2015. 97 - In FY 2015, a Traffic Signal Communication Technician position were added. 98 - In FY 2015, three Automated Route Operator positions and one Maintenance Worker position were added. 99 - In FY 2015, an Assistant Aquatics Coordinator position were added. 100 - In FY 2015, the Operations Specialist I position was reclassified to an ARFF Specialist I position and one position was eliminated. The Operations Manager was retitled to Assistant Airport Director. The Operations Specialist II position was reclassified to ARFF Supervisor. The ARFF Coordinator (part-time) position was reclassified to ARFF Specialist I (part-time). The Maintenance Specialist position was retitled Operations Supervisor. The Maintenance Technician positions was retitled Operations Specialists. The Operations Specialist II (part-time) was reclassified to an Operations Specialist (part-time) position.

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT CITY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES BY FUNCTION/PROGRAM Last Ten Fiscal Years

(continued)

Table XVIII (Continued)

196

- During FY 2015, the Water Production Director position was renamed to Utility Director and moved to the Public Works Admin department. The Assistant Director Water Production was renamed Deputy Utility Director. The Chief Operator position was renamed Treatment Chief of Operations. 116 - During FY 2015, the Stormwater Program Technician was renamed to Stormwater Program Specialist. 117 - During FY 2015, the ROW Coordinator position was transferred from the City Manager's department. The ROW Coordinator position is funded with Bond Funds.

115

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT CITY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES BY FUNCTION/PROGRAM Last Ten Fiscal Years

Table XVIII (Continued)

197

* = Not available

Sanitation Number of residential customers Number of commercial/industrial customers Tons of garbage and bulk collected

Health and welfare Public service contracts

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Fiscal Year 2011 2012

2013

2014

2015

Table XIX

41% / 65% 5,110 2,441 2,049 610

45% / 80% 5,517 2,639 1,954 694

10 278

19 231

16,710 1,850 89,330

16,900 1,875 90,910

120 4

160 5

5.0 12.0 10.3

6.0 15.1 18.4

3,525 14,250

5 min 11 sec 10,982

5 min 9 sec 10,075

2,926 13,727

138 7,396 1,372 7 min 47 sec 13 min 55 sec

38 8,251 1,231 7 min 54 sec 14 min 54 sec

17,350 1,982 90,905

14 324

110 2

32.0 11.0 10.2

5,383 11,584

5,242 2,124 1,692 576

36% / 73%

5 min 13 sec 10,544

156 7,321 1,342 7 min 33 sec 13 min 49 sec

18,507 2,133 78,545

10 324

95 8

7.0 10.0 9.0

4,658 9,914

4,704 2,249 1,884 562

31% / 73%

5 min 15 sec 11,071

110 6,082 963 7 min 38 sec 13 min 52 sec

19,064 2,097 83,589

22 404

192 -

11.0 50.0 -

4,949 11,396

5,009 2,471 1,960 532

39% / 89%

5 min 9 sec 9,747

52 7,021 1,014 5 min 3 sec 14 min 33 sec

19,494 2,055 79,590

17 586

312 -

7.9 15.0 -

4,584 8,934

4,780 2,315 1,862 538

60% / 90%

5 min 6 sec 12,548

41 9,126 795 4 min 51 sec 13 min 56 sec

19,933 2,001 81,697

Not Available Not Available

330 -

4.0 64.0 -

4,855 13,837

4,582 1,956 2,008 596

62% / 92%

5 min 14 sec 12,334

41 7,349 708 4 min 43 sec 14 min 24 sec

20,576 1,984 84,088

48 489

390 -

8.7 52.0

6,106 15,396

4,082 1,685 1,830 526

86% / 87%

4 min 11 sec 13,851

25 8,458 685 4 min 50 sec 14 min 27 sec

21,146 2,004 84,417

84 498

460 27

7.0 62.0

6,097 12,595

4,258 1,765 1,710 668

79% / 98%

4 min 36 sec 13,044

10 8,204 851 4 min 43 sec 13 min 4 sec

(continued)

21,178 1,905 83,614

75 538

383 24

13.0 50.3

7,286 13,475

4,021 1,622 1,719 619

86% / 97%

4 min 44 sec 13,010

17 7,137 651 7 min 13 sec 12 min 34 sec

$66M $58M $120M $114M $106M $115M $110M $159M $186M $235M $ 52,730,401 $ 67,494,871 $ 94,790,751 $ 77,527,829 $ 97,408,266 $ 91,702,563 $ 112,611,694 $ 145,606,448 $ 119,314,561 $ 165,743,994 4.52% 5.28% 3.07% 0.09% 0.20% 0.14% 0.14% 0.15% 0.15% 0.23%

Highways & streets Street: New lane miles Streets seal coated (lane miles) Streets overlaid (lane miles) Traffic signals: Signal lights repaired Equipment upgraded by intersection Engineering: Construction contracts administered/managed Construction/building plans & plats reviewed

Public safety Police: Noise violations Speeding citations Stop sign/red light citations Priority 1 calls Priority 2 calls Fire: Fire/EMS response time average (minutes) Fire/EMS incidents responded to % of one & two-family residential structure fires confined to room/structure of origin Animal control: Animals handled Animals euthanized Animals adopted Animals reclaimed by owner Inspections: Permits issued 1 Building inspections

General government Capital projects obligated Total funds invested @ 9/30 Average return on investments

Function/Program

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS OPERATING INDICATORS BY FUNCTION/PROGRAM Last Ten Fiscal Years

198

5,360 283 35,506 492 8.07 5.34

4,500 270 38,400 214 8.10 5.75

4.00 22,747 3.51 2.18 10.936 26.071 $0.68 324 713 17,510 $2.50

4.85 20,015 4.00 2.50 13.265 25.312 $0.56 425 742 26,288 $2.45

23,000 86 / 100%

599 91.0%

475 92.0%

26,000 86 / 100%

57.2 8 100

2007

68.4 6 106

2006

* = Not available Source: Data collected from various city departments for the budget. 1 In FY 2015, permits issued were restated for FY 2013 and FY 2014.

Water/sewer Surface water treated (billions of gallons) Number of customers (active meters) Water billed (billions of gallons) Sewer billed (billions of gallons) Average daily production of treated water in MG (millions of gallons) Highest daily production of treated water in MG (millions of gallons) Average Cost of water treated per 1,000 gallons Water main breaks repaired New water taps installed Sewer mains replaced (linear feet) Average cost for wastewater per 1,000 gallons (Doshier Only)

Airport Airshow attendance T-Hangars available / occupancy rate

Function/Program Culture and leisure services Parks: Ratio of acres maintained per maintenance staff employee Park master plans designed Park/city improvement projects completed Leisure services: Number of classes offered Overall customer satisfaction Mayborn center: Number of room nights Event days booked Golf course: Number of rounds of golf played Number of youth in 'Learn to Golf' program Education: Circulation per capita Library visits per capita

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS OPERATING INDICATORS BY FUNCTION/PROGRAM Last Ten Fiscal Years

$2.55

$0.69 325 700 17,000

22.832

12.069

4.75 22,418 4.12 2.29

22,000 86 / 100%

8.23 5.48

40,500 600

5,628 259

650 93.6%

61.7 2 115

2008

$1.15

$0.76 325 700 5,300

25.175

13.332

4.88 22,467 4.50 2.33

23,000 86 / 100%

7.31 4.65

29,506 240

4,210 192

830 94.0%

61.2 2 151

2009

$1.96

$0.84 301 475 10,597

21.298

11.966

4.80 22,871 4.02 2.31

26,000 86 / 100%

7.03 4.75

27,771 40

10,379 210

807 98.6%

33.0 3 161

$2.06

$0.71 689 444 39,934

27.047

15.551

5.68 23,245 4.95 2.37

28,600 86 / 100%

6.68 4.78

6,642 144

8,030 266

1,141 99.4%

Fiscal Year 2011

32.5 2 134

2010

33.0 3 141

$1.79

$0.79 595 646 26,284

24.655

13.965

5.73 23,802 4.68 2.36

22,000 74 / 100%

6.53 4.34

29,654 176

9,200 305

1,182 99.5%

2012

34.0 2 165

$1.95

$0.84 539 873 24,265

22.982

15.086

5.54 24,616 4.53 2.39

22,500 74 / 100%

6.16 4.05

32,081 126

6,550 306

1,438 98.0%

2013

34.0 3 214

$1.73

$1.13 613 629 9,406

23.800

14.950

5.46 25,226 4.26 2.39

24,262 74 / 100%

5.71 3.74

29,990 161

12,210 330

1,399 97.0%

2014

34.0 2 224

$1.44

$1.05 289 837 20,570

25.200

14.400

5.32 25,953 4.21 2.25

26,500 74 / 100%

5.58 3.66

32,081 126

14,180 336

1,544 97.0%

2015

Table XIX (Continued)

199

* = Not available

Culture & leisure services Parks & recreation: Park acreage developed Park acreage undeveloped Golf course Baseball/softball fields Tennis courts Swimming pools/water park Soccer fields Picnic pavilions Basketball courts Playgrounds Community centers Recreation centers Multi-use fields Sand volleyball courts Hike and bike trails Roller hockey court Extreme skate park Disc golf course Education: Number of volumes 678 49 1 17 16 4 6 24 18 38 2 3 7 2 11 1 1 2 157,467

156,085

751.21 0.20 7.60

678 49 1 17 16 4 6 24 18 36 2 3 7 2 9 1 1 2

751.21 0.20 7.60

7 2,500

7 2,082 2

Public safety Police: Stations Fire: Stations Hydrants 3 Highways & streets Paved streets (lane miles) Unpaved streets (miles) Paved alleys (miles)

2007

2006

Function/Program

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS CAPITAL ASSET STATISTICS BY FUNCTION/PROGRAM Last Ten Fiscal Years

159,767

678 49 1 17 16 4 6 25 18 36 2 3 7 2 12 1 2

765.00 1.50 7.50

7 2,690

2008

153,056

678 49 1 17 16 4 6 25 18 36 2 3 7 2 12 1 2

765.00 1.50 7.50

7 2,690

2009

166,747

688 49 1 17 14 4 6 27 18 37 2 3 8 2 16 1 2

765.00 1.50 7.50

7 2,772

167,550

688 109 1 17 16 5 6 26 18 39 2 3 8 2 18 1 2

765.00 1.50 7.50

8 2,831

Fiscal Year 2010 2011

177,035

688 109 1 17 16 5 6 27 18 40 2 3 11 2 18 1 2

1,028.00 1.50 7.50

8 2,889

2012

189,168

688 109 1 17 16 5 8 27 18 41 1 3 9 2 18 1 2

1,044.00 1.50 7.50

8 3,111

2013

185,450

718 109 1 17 16 5 8 27 18 41 1 3 8 2 18 1 2

1,044.00 1.50 7.50

8 3,368

2014

184,993 (continued)

718 109 1 17 14 5 8 26 18 41 1 3 8 2 18 1 2

1,058.00 1.50 7.50

8 3,441

2015

Table XX

200

97.5 537 10.936 41.4 21,765 90.0 362 24 4.080 6.590 7.500 10.000 2 17,930

90.0 362 24 2.000 4.486 7.500 10.000 2 17,356

2007

97.5 537 13.265 41.4 21,263

2006

7.500 10.000 2 18,564

4.080 6.590

90.0 410 24

97.5 593 12.069 41.4 22,149

2008

Source: Data collected from various departments for the budget statistical section.

- MGD = million gallons daily - FY 2012, paved streets' total was restated from 1,607 lane miles to 1,028 3 - FY 2015, hydrants' total was restated from 3,500 to 3,368

Water and sewer Water: Water system (square miles) Water mains (miles) Daily average production (MGD1) Plant capacity (MGD1) Number of service connections Sewer: Sewage system (square miles) Sanitary sewers (miles) Number of lift stations Daily average treatment: Doshier Farm (MGD1) Temple-Belton WWTP (MGD1) Maximum capacity of treatment plants: Doshier Farm (MGD1) Temple-Belton WWTP (MGD1) Number of disposal plants Number of service connections

Function/Program

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS CAPITAL ASSET STATISTICS BY FUNCTION/PROGRAM Last Ten Fiscal Years

7.500 10.000 2 18,945

4.080 6.590

90.0 410 24

97.5 593 13.332 41.4 22,467

2009

7.500 10.000 2 19,395

3.430 5.659

90.0 410 27

97.5 600 11.966 41.4 22,871

7.500 10.000 2 19,791

1.900 5.470

90.0 410 27

97.5 600 15.551 41.4 23,245

Fiscal Year 2010 2011

7.500 10.000 2 20,206

2.290 6.380

90.0 410 29

97.5 600 13.965 41.4 23,802

2012

7.500 10.000 2 20,826

2.200 6.340

90.0 410 29

97.5 600 15.086 41.4 24,616

2013

7.500 10.000 2 21,386

1.430 6.490

90.0 400 31

97.5 594 14.950 41.4 25,226

2014

7.500 10.000 2 21,983

2.240 7.070

90.0 389 32

97.5 599 14.400 41.4 25,953

2015

Table XX (Continued)

201

127,071,062

136,099,382

2013

2014

164,924,797

158,609,168

144,378,679

138,612,957

132,228,203

96,482,373

91,876,796

86,582,734

81,792,995

66,943,722

82.5%

80.1%

81.8%

79.5%

77.7%

61.2%

61.5%

59.8%

60.2%

71.7%

72.8%

Funded Ratio (1/2)

(3)

28,825,415

31,538,106

26,298,738

28,477,920

29,512,397

37,394,089

35,358,984

34,844,198

32,545,127

18,932,498

16,943,152

(4) Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability

28,503,722

27,491,028

26,738,649

26,260,983

25,450,326

25,179,120

25,028,861

21,602,818

19,545,194

$ 18,559,837

Annual Covered Payroll

(5)

101.1%

114.7%

98.4%

108.4%

116.0%

146.9%

140.4%

139.2%

150.7%

96.9%

91.3%

(6) UAAL as a Percentage of ACP (4/5)

17.50%

17.51%

16.76%

15.39%

14.69%

14.31%

14.06%

13.93%

14.52%

(7) Total TMRS Required Contribution Rate (1)

6.16%

6.34%

6.42%

5.57%

4.71%

4.60%

4.74%

4.56%

4.84%

(8) Prior Service Portion of the TMRS Rate

Table XXI

This rate does not include the supplemental death benefit component of the total TMRS rate. Prior to restructuring

Restructured

(3)

(2)

(1)

Note: In June, 2011, SB 350 was enacted by the Texas Legislature, resulting in a restructure of the TMRS funds. This legislation provided for the actuarial valuation to be completed, as if restructuring had occurred on December 31, 2010. In addition, the actuarial assumptions were updated for the new fund structure, based on an actuarial experience study that was adopted by the TMRS Board at their May, 2011 meeting (the review compared actual to expected experience for the four-year period of January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2009). For a complete description of the combined impact of the legislation and new actuarial assumptions, including the effects on TMRS city rates and funding ratios, please see the December 31, 2010 TMRS Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR).

Source: Texas Municipal Retirement System

118,079,941

2012

110,135,037

56,517,812

2009

2011

51,738,536

2008

59,088,284

49,247,868

2007

102,715,806

48,011,224

2006

2010 (3)

$ 45,257,477

2005

2010 (2)

Actuarial Accrued Liability

Actuarial Value of Assets

Calendar Year $ 62,200,629

(2)

(1)

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS TEXAS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM ANALYSIS OF FUNDING PROGRESS AND CONTRIBUTION RATES Last Ten Calendar Years

202

34,400,736 39,056,649 -

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

50,613,335

45,148,511

43,373,453

39,027,627

77.2%

76.2%

76.7%

77.6%

78.0%

Funded Ratio (1/2)

(3)

Source: Temple Firefighters' Relief and Retirement Fund

30,270,841

2008 33,272,723

2007

2010

$ 26,362,903

2006

2009

Actuarial Accrued Liability

Actuarial Value of Assets

Fiscal Year $ 33,812,661

(2)

(1)

7,449,758

Not Available

11,556,686

Not Available

10,747,775

Not Available

10,100,730

Not Available

8,756,786

Not Available

(4) Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS TEMPLE FIREFIGHTERS' RELIEF AND RETIREMENT FUND ANALYSIS OF FUNDING PROGRESS AND CONTRIBUTION RATES Last Ten Fiscal Years

7,446,056

6,503,608

6,164,329

6,176,101

$ 5,410,905

Annual Covered Payroll

(5)

155.2%

165.3%

163.9%

141.8%

137.7%

(6) UAAL as a Percentage of ACP (4/5)

15.24%

14.93%

14.31%

13.93%

(7) Total Actual Contribution Rate

Table XXII

203

2,990,243

2,883,066

3,607,614

3,778,482

2009

2010

2011 2

2012

2013

Total Average

2015

489,387

$ 4,513,415 $ 501,491

$ 29,743,341 $ 3,304,816

483,487

609,871

655,846

478,695

507,156

459,334

451,326

378,312

4,228,885

Retiree Expense

15.3%

11.6%

12.6%

16.1%

18.2%

16.6%

17.0%

16.0%

16.1%

13.8%

Percentage Retiree Costs to Total

623

588

585

559

636

618

640

678

665

636

Active Members

108

110

106

109

113

110

107

Retirees Using City Health Care

290

354

340

319

302

273

264

250

258

247

Total TMRS Retirees

Total Firemens' Retirees

17.4%

18.7%

16.9%

19.0%

17.1%

17.6%

17.0%

16.7%

16.5%

16.8%

342,249

327,376

327,884

304,384

312,355

353,534

306,720

292,279

243,050

$ 2,809,833 $ 312,204

Percentage Retirees Using Plan to Total Retiree Members Contributions

- In FY 2011 the City changed from a group health insurance plan to self funded plan for both employees and retirees.

- In FY 2014 the City changed from self funded plan to a group health insurance plan both employees and retirees.

Source: City records, Texas Municipal Retirement System and the Temple Firefighters' Relief and Retirement Fund. - Information prior to FY 2005 is not available in this format. As additional years of data become available, the City will report 10 years of historical data.

2,873,954

2008

3,835,827

2,803,703

2007

$ 2,741,567

Fiscal Year 1

2014

Total Health Care Expenses

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS ACTIVE AND RETIREE HEALTH CARE COSTS Last Ten Fiscal Years

(147,138)

(156,110)

(281,987)

(351,462)

(166,340)

(153,622)

(152,614)

(159,047)

(135,262)

$ (1,703,582) $ (189,287)

Net Subsidy of Retirees

5.7%

3.5%

4.1%

7.5%

9.7%

5.8%

5.1%

5.3%

5.7%

4.9%

Subsidy as Percentage of Total Expense

$ $

40,985 4,554

6,360

5,730

5,668

4,641

3,891

3,880

3,561

3,537

3,716

Cost per Active Member

$ $

41,851 4,650

4,449

4,884

5,754

6,017

4,392

4,653

4,065

4,103

3,536

Cost per Retiree

Table XXIII

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS AVERAGE DAILY TREATED WATER VS. AVERAGE DAILY TREATMENT CAPACITY Fiscal Years 2006 - 2015

Table XXIV

Average Average

Daily

Fiscal

Daily

Treatment

Peak Day

Year

Treatment (MGD)

Capacity (MGD)

Usage (MGD)

2006

13.2650

41.40

25.31

2007

10.9360

41.40

18.55

2008

12.0690

41.40

22.83

2009

13.3220

41.40

25.18

2010

11.9660

41.40

21.30

2011

15.5510

41.40

27.05

2012

13.9650

41.40

24.66

2013

15.0860

41.40

22.98

2014

14.9500

41.40

23.80

2015

14.4000

41.40

25.20

Source: Public Works Administration Office

204

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS ANNUAL TREATED WATER VS. TOTAL AVAILABLE WATER Fiscal Years 2006 - 2015

Table XXV

Fiscal Year

Annual Treated Water (Acre feet)

Total Available Water (Acre feet)

2006

14,893

41,953

2007

12,308

41,953

2008

14,568

44,453

2009

14,952

44,453

2010

14,733

44,453

2011

19,041

44,453

2012

15,699

44,453

2013

17,006

44,453

2014

14,775

44,453

2015

16,313

44,453

Source: Public Works Administration Office

205

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS WATER AND SEWER UTILITY SYSTEM Schedule of Water Pumped to Town vs. Water Billed Fiscal Year Ending Sept 30, 2006

Water Pumped to Town (gals) 1 $

4,852,811

Water Billed (gals) 1 $

4,376,164

Table XXVI

City Usage (gals) 1 $

% (Billed + City) vs Pumped

93,794

92.11%

Water Revenues $

% Increase (Decrease) Water Water Revenues Billed

13,227,268

12.83%

14.43%

2007

4,010,618

3,510,152

78,432

89.48%

11,652,316

-11.91%

-19.79%

2008

4,746,950

4,121,433

106,891

89.07%

14,364,289

23.27%

17.41%

2009

4,875,819

4,507,169

104,772

94.59%

16,226,526

12.96%

9.36%

2010

4,800,000

4,019,774

92,223

85.67%

14,466,103

-10.85%

-10.81%

2011

5,685,057

4,947,980

156,261

89.78%

17,784,551

22.94%

23.09%

2012

5,733,506

4,678,166

129,123

83.85%

16,948,961

-4.70%

-5.45%

2013

4,995,801

4,539,199

120,740

93.28%

16,968,854

0.12%

-2.97%

2014

4,814,440

4,260,031

106,503

90.70%

16,297,510

-3.96%

-6.15%

2015

4,750,924

4,213,140

97,517

90.73%

16,278,062

-0.12%

-1.10%

- Information is reported in thousands of gallons

Source: Public Works Administration Office and Utility Business Office

206

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS WATER AND SEWER UTILITY SYSTEM Schedule of Water Customers - Residential and Commercial

Table XXVII

Fiscal Year Ending September 30,

Residential

Commercial

Total

Percentage Growth

2006

18,454

2,809

21,263

0.89%

2007

18,961

2,804

21,765

2.36%

2008

19,385

2,764

22,149

1.76%

2009

19,686

2,781

22,467

1.44%

2010

20,139

2,732

22,871

1.80%

2011

20,517

2,728

23,245

1.64%

2012

21,035

2,767

23,802

2.40%

2013

21,828

2,788

24,616

3.42%

2014

22,430

2,796

25,226

2.48%

2015

23,097

2,856

25,953

2.88%

Source: Utility Business Office

207

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS AVERAGE DAILY TREATED WASTEWATER VS. AVERAGE DAILY TREATMENT CAPACITY Fiscal Years 2006 - 2015

Table XXVIII

Average

Fiscal

Average Daily

Daily

Wastewater Treated (MGD)

Treatment

Year

Temple-Belton WWTP

Doshier

Total

Capacity (MGD)

2006

5.31

2.02

7.33

17.50

2007

4.55

2.21

6.76

17.50

2008

5.71

2.14

7.85

17.50

2009

3.46

2.25

5.71

17.50

2010

5.66

2.43

8.09

17.50

2011

5.47

1.90

7.37

17.50

2012

6.38

2.29

8.67

17.50

2013

6.34

2.20

8.54

17.50

2014

6.49

1.43

7.92

17.50

2015

7.07

2.24

9.31

17.50

Source: Public Works Administration Office

208

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS WATER AND SEWER UTILITY SYSTEM Schedule of Sewer Customers - Residential and Commercial

Table XXIX

Fiscal Year Ending September 30,

Residential

Commercial

Total

Percentage Growth

2006

15,321

2,035

17,356

1.95%

2007

15,886

2,044

17,930

3.31%

2008

16,485

2,079

18,564

3.54%

2009

16,849

2,096

18,945

2.05%

2010

17,314

2,081

19,395

2.38%

2011

17,704

2,087

19,791

2.04%

2012

18,101

2,105

20,206

2.10%

2013

18,715

2,111

20,826

3.07%

2014

19,259

2,127

21,386

2.69%

2015

19,823

2,160

21,983

2.79%

Source: Utility Business Office

209

Table XXX

City of Temple, Texas Top 10 Water Customers For the year ended September 30, 2015 Customer

Gallons

Scott & White Hospital Panda Temple Power, LLC City of Morgan's Point Resort * City of Temple Dr Pepper Bottling Pactiv Corporation Wilsonart International Housing Authority Temple Public Schools City of Troy *

Revenue

177,915,800 $ 241,649,200 134,732,300 97,516,500 29,325,700 69,712,200 51,202,600 34,914,400 38,854,800 37,288,700 913,112,200 $

668,220 798,276 454,052 441,723 96,357 245,935 192,532 132,977 162,780 163,376 3,356,228

1,059,151

* Wholesale customers

% of Total Annual Revenue 4.11% 4.90% 2.79% 2.71% 0.59% 1.51% 1.18% 0.82% 1.00% 1.00% 20.61%

% of Total Usage 4.22% 5.74% 3.20% 2.31% 0.70% 1.65% 1.22% 0.83% 0.92% 0.89% 21.68%

City of Temple, Texas Top 10 Wastewater Customers For the year ended September 30, 2015

Customer Scott & White Hospital Wildwood Apartments Housing Authority Wilsonart International Pactiv Corporation Temple Public Schools Meadow Village Apartments Twin Oaks Apartments Dr Pepper Bottling City of Temple

Gallons

Revenue

142,096,100 $ 15,683,100 31,249,600 26,069,700 29,585,400 26,499,000 17,218,600 14,427,800 14,822,000 14,224,800 331,876,100 $

Source: Utility Business Office

210

641,991 70,670 141,371 118,505 133,394 120,951 77,781 64,973 66,747 67,662 1,504,045

% of Total Annual Revenue 5.71% 0.63% 1.26% 1.05% 1.19% 1.08% 0.69% 0.58% 0.59% 0.60% 13.38%

% of Total Usage 6.31% 0.70% 1.39% 1.16% 1.31% 1.18% 0.76% 0.64% 0.66% 0.63% 14.74%

City of Temple, Texas Insurance Coverage

Table XXXI

Type of Coverage and Insurer

Amount of Coverage

Deductible (1) Amounts

Policy Expiration (2) Date

Property: Building & Contents: Texas Municipal League

263,938,450

$ $

234,739 1,600,000

Contractor's equipment: Texas Municipal League

6,129,960

Electronic Equipment: Texas Municipal League

485,000

Liability: Employee Dishonesty, Theft, Disappearance, & Destruction: Texas Municipal League $

200,000

Fine Arts/Valuable Papers: Texas Municipal League

Airport: Texas Municipal League

Error & omissions: Texas Municipal League General: Texas Municipal League

Real and Personal

5,000

10/01/15

Fine Arts Valuable Papers & Records: Includes EDP Media

$ $

500 5,000

10/01/15 10/01/15

1,000

10/01/15

1,000

10/01/15

5,000

10/01/15

$ $

0 0

10/01/15 10/01/15

2,500

10/01/15

Equipment

$ $

1,000,000 1,000,000

Premises Products/ Completed Operations HangarKeepers-Each Aircraft Non-Owned Aircraft Each Occurrence

1,000,000

10,000

10/01/15

1,000,000

10/01/15

211

City of Temple, Texas Insurance Coverage

Table XXXI

Type of Coverage and Insurer Liability (Cont'd): Auto: Texas Municipal League Auto Physical Damage: Texas Municipal League Law Enforcement: Texas Municipal League

Amount of Coverage

1,000,000

Deductible (1) Amounts

Per Schedule $

1,000,000

$ $ $ $ $

500,000 500,000 500,000 200,000 5,000

5,000

Policy Expiration (2) Date

10/01/15

25,000 $

10,000

10/01/15

Bonds: Western Surety Company Hartford Casualty Ins. Co Hartford Casualty Ins. Co Hartford Casualty Ins. Co Insurer's Indemnity

Finance Director City Manager Each (3) Finance City Secretary Electrical Inspector Plumbing Inspector

Worker's Compensation: Texas Municipal League

09/01/15

10/01/15

Source: City of Temple Legal Department Per occurrence, unless noted.

(1) (2)

03/03/15 05/19/15 10/01/15 10/01/15 06/08/15

Policies are renewed annually or replaced with similar coverage.

212

Table XXXII

Mis-

2015 Population: 73,4081 2015 Assessed Value: $3,840,746,157 Median Age 2: 36 Median Household Income2: $48,581 Total Employment in Temple: 31,793 Total Labor Force in Temple: 33,046 Square Miles: 74.1 Developable Land Remaining: 33.79 Square Miles Housing Units: 

Owner Occupied2: 59%



Renter Occupied2: 41%



Vacant2: 17.8%

Average Home Sale Price: $152,286 Average Temperatures in January: HI: upper 60’s LOW: upper 30’s Average Temperatures in July: HI: upper 90’s LOW: lower 70’s Average Annual Temperature: 66.6 degrees Rainfall: 

Wettest Month: May / 4.5”



Driest Month: July / 1.80”



Average Annual Rainfall: 34.8”

Only Health & Bioscience District in Texas Scott & White Hospital—Only Level I Trauma Center between Dallas and Austin McLane Children’s Hospital Scott & White—Only acute care pediatric hospital between Dallas and Austin 84% of Texas’ population is within 180 miles of Temple 1

2015 Population based on new residential water customers multiplied by 2010 Census data of average household size of 2.47. 2

Source for statistic is 2010 United States Census

Sources: 2010 United States Census, Temple Economic Development Corporation, Texas Workforce Commission and the City of Temple. 213

Table XXXII (continued)

Miscellaneous Statistical Data

GOVERNMENT Form of government: .................................... Council-Manager, July 8, 1922 Area in square miles: ............................................................................ 74.1 Date of original public sale of town lots: ................................ June 20, 1881 Original charter, special: ..................................................... March 27, 1907 Amendment to charter: ........................................................ August 5, 1919 Second charter, home rule city: ................................................ July 8, 1922 Amendment to charter: ............................................................ April 7, 1926 Third charter, present: .................................................. September 23, 1953 Amendment to charter: .................................................... October 23, 1967 Amendment to charter: ............................................................ April 2, 1977 Amendment to charter: .................................................... January 20, 1990 Amendment to charter: ............................................................ May 4, 1996 Amendment to charter: ............................................................ May 6, 2000 Amendment to charter: ................................................... November 4, 2014 2015 Population (est.): ...................................................................... 73,408

LAND USE (Square Miles) Agriculture: ......................................................................................... 30.95 Commercial/Industrial: ........................................................................ 22.13 Mixed use: ............................................................................................ 0.33

Residential: ......................................................................................... 15.90

214

Table XXXII (continued)

Miscellaneous Statistical Data

SERVICE STATISTICS Airport Number of airports: ...................... 1 7,000’ full precision approach runway and a 4,740’ crosswind runway serving general aviation, jet, charter, medical, helicopter and military operations Open 5 am—10 pm 7 days a week, 365 days a year Home of the Central Texas Air Show!

Fire Protection Number of stations: .............................. 8

Number of hydrants: ...................... 3,441 Number of fire fighters: ..................... 120 Fire fighters per 1,000 population: ... 1.63 Insurers Services Office (ISO) Rating: .. 3

Police Protection Number of stations: .................................... 1 Number of sworn officers: ...................... 144 Sworn officers per 1,000 population: ..... 1.95 215

Table XXXII (continued)

Miscellaneous Statistical Data

SERVICE STATISTICS CONTINUED Libraries Number of libraries (public): ............................. 1 Number of volumes: .............................. 184,993 Circulation of volumes (2013-2014):...... 409,970 Library cards in force: .............................. 49,080

Parks and Recreation Park acreage developed: ....... 718

Park acreage undeveloped: 108.9 Golf course: ................................ 1 Baseball/softball fields: ............. 17 Tennis courts:........................... 14 Swimming pools: ........................ 4 Soccer fields:.............................. 8 Picnic pavilions:........................ 26 Basketball courts: ..................... 18 Playgrounds: ............................ 41

Community center: ..................... 1 Recreation center: ...................... 3 Multi-use fields: .......................... 8 Sand volleyball courts: ............... 2 Trail miles: ................................ 18 Extreme skate park: ................... 1 Disc golf course:......................... 2 Family water park: ...................... 1 216

Table XXXII (continued)

Miscellaneous Statistical Data

SERVICE STATISTICS CONTINUED Streets Paved streets: ................ 1,058 lane miles Unpaved streets: ....................... 1.5 miles Paved alleys: ............................. 7.5 miles Unpaved alleys: ...................... 72.5 miles (all figures are approximate)

Utilities Water system: ......................................... 97.5 sq. miles Miles of water mains: ..................................... 599 miles

Daily average water treatment: ..................14.40 MGD* Water treatment plant capacity: .................. 41.40 MGD Number of water service connections: ............... 25,953 Source of water: ..................................... Surface Water Wastewater collection system: ................... 90 sq. miles Miles of wastewater collection system lines: .. 389 miles Number of lift stations: .............................................. 32 Daily average wastewater treatment: Doshier Farm ..................................... 2.24 MGD Temple-Belton WWTP........................ 7.07 MGD Maximum capacity of treatment plants: Doshier Farm ....................................... 7.5 MGD Belton Wastewater Treatment Plant ... 10.0 MGD Number of wastewater treatment plants: .................... 2 Number of wastewater service connections: ...... 21,983 *MGDâ€”Million gallons daily

217

Table XXXII (continued)

Miscellaneous Statistical Data

EDUCATION STATISTICS Temple Independent School District Senior high school: .................... 1 Number of classrooms: .......... 132 Middle schools: .......................... 3 Number of classrooms: .......... 142 Elementary schools: .................. 9 Number of classrooms: .......... 265 Admin. personnel & support: 622*

Teachers: ............................. 605* Total Students: .................. 8,635* Annual budget: ........ $84,600,000 *Represents a combined total of all the schools in Temple

Private Schools Central Texas Christian School, Pre K3—12 grade Christ Church School, Pre K3—5th grade Holy Trinity Catholic School, 9th—12th grade Immanuel Lutheran School, Pre K2—Pre K4 St. Francis Episcopal Church & School, Pre K3—Kindergarten St. Mary’s Catholic School, Pre K3—8th grade Temple Christian Academy, 1st—12 grade Temple Montessori School, 2 yrs.—6th grade Young World Kindergarten & Daycare Center, Pre K2—5yrs. 218

Table XXXII (continued)

Miscellaneous Statistical Data

EDUCATION STATISTICS CONTINUED Temple College* Number of classrooms & labs: .....................186 Number of administrative personnel: .............46 Number of full-time professors: ...................123 Number of full-time students1....................1,769 Number of part-time students1 ..................3,428 Population served .................................174,365 Counties served: ............................................. 3 East Bell, Milam and East Williamson Counties

Annual budget:.............................. $47,230,969 * 1

Source: Temple College Total fall enrollment

Higher Educational Institutions (within 75 miles of Temple) Austin Community College

Southwestern University

Baylor University

Tarleton State University

Central Texas College

Temple College

Concordia Lutheran College

Texas A&M University

Hill Junior College

Texas State Technical College

Huston-Tillotson College

The University of Texas at Austin

McLennan Community College

University of Mary Hardin-Baylor

St. Edwardâ€™s University

219

Table XXXII (continued)

Miscellaneous Statistical Data

OTHER STATISTICS Hospitals Number of hospitals: ....................................... 3 Scott & White Memorial Hospital & Clinic McLane Children’s Hospital at Scott & White Veteran’s Administration Hospital Number of beds:....................................... 1,094

Bond Rating—General Obligation (G.O.) Debt Moody’s Investors Service: ........................ Aa2 Rating Standard & Poor’s: ....................................... AA Rating

Bond Rating—Utility System Revenue Debt Moody’s Investors Service: ........................ Aa2 Rating Standard & Poor’s: ....................................... AA Rating

220

Compliance Section

221

222

--BROCKWAY - · · - GERSBACH - · · - FRANKLIN & - - NIEMEIER,P.C. CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS

To the City Council City of Temple, Texas

We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, the discretely presented component units, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of City of Temple, Texas (the City), as of and for the year ended September 30, 2015, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated January 28, 2016. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City's internal control over financial reporting (internal control) to determine the audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the entity's financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or, significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified.

POST OFFICE BOX

4083 •

TEMPLE, TEXAS

76505-4083 • 254.773.9907 •

WWW. TEMPLECPA.C.:OM 223

FAX

254.773.1570

Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City's financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit, and accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards.

Purpose of this Report The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the entity's internal control and compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose. Brockway, Gersbach, Franklin & Niemeier, P.C.

~~~-~r~ff. Temple, Texas January 28, 2016

224

--BROCKWAY - · · - GERSBACH - · · - FRANKLIN & - - NIEMEIER,P.C. CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON COMPLIANCE FOR EACH MAJOR PROGRAM AND ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE REQUIRED BY OMB CIRCULAR A-133

To the City Council City of Temple, Texas

Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program We have audited City of Temple, Texas' (the City) compliance with the types of compliance requirements described in the OMB Circular A-133 Compliance Supplement that could have a direct and material effect on each of the City's major federal programs for the year ended September 30, 2015. The City's major federal programs are identified in the summary of auditors' results section of the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs.

Management's Responsibility Management is responsible for compliance with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants applicable to its federal programs.

Auditors' Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on compliance for each of City's major federal programs based on our audit of the types of compliance requirements referred to above. We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Those standards and OMB Circular A-133 require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the City's' compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion on compliance for each major federal program. However, our audit does not provide a legal determination of the City's compliance.

Opinion on Each Major Federal Program In our opinion, the City of Temple, Texas, complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on each of its major federal programs for the year ended September 30, 2015.

POST OFFICE BOX

4083 •

TEMPLE, TEXAS

76505-4083 • 254.773.9907 •

WWW.TEMPLECPA.COM

225

FAX

254.773.1570

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON COMPLIANCE FOR EACH MAJOR PROGRAM AND ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE REQUIRED BY OMB CIRCULAR A-133 (CONTINUED)

Report on Internal Control Over Compliance Management of the City is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over compliance with the types of compliance requirements referred to above. In planning and performing our audit of compliance, we considered the City's internal control over compliance with the types of requirements that could have a direct and material effect on each major federal program to determine the auditing procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing an opinion on compliance for each major federal program and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with OMB Circular A-133, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control over compliance. A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program that is less severe than a material weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance. Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. We did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses may exist that have not been identified. The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements of OMB Circular A-133. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose. Brockway, Gersbach, Franklin & Niemeier, P.C.

Temple, Texas January 28, 2016

226

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,2015

Section 1-Summary of Auditors' Results Financial Statements Type of auditor's report issued was unmodified. Internal control over financial reporting: Material weakness(es) identified: Significant deficiency(ies) identified: Noncompliance material to financial statements noted?

__yes __yes __yes

__lL_no __lL_ none reported _!L_no

__yes __yes

__lL_no __lL_ no none reported

Federal Awards Internal control over major programs: Material weakness(es) identified: Significant deficiency(ies) identified:

Type of auditors' report issued on compliance for major programs was unmodified. Any audit findings disclosed that are required to be reported in accordance with section 51 O(a) of OMB Circular A-133? __yes __lL_no Identification of major programs: Name of Federal Program or Cluster

CFDA Number(s)

Community Development Block Grants/Entitlement Grants

14.218

Dollar threshold used to distinguish between type A and type 8 programs:

$300.000

Auditee qualified as low-risk auditee?

___lLyes

227

CITY OF TEMPLE, TEXAS SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015

Section 11-Financial Statement Findings There were no findings and no matters were reported.

Section Ill-Federal Award Findings and Questioned Costs There were no findings and no matters were reported.

228