The politics of professional liberalization in Greece, 2010-2018 DR FRANCESCO STOLFI MACQUARIE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OECD WORKSHOP ON REGULATORY BARRIERS TO COMPETITION IN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES November 18-19, 2021
The question
How differences in power across four professions and divisions within them affected how liberalization was implemented in Greece (2010-2018)
2
Power and intra-professional divisions POWER Power as ability to access policy-makers • • • •
Insiders v. outsiders Financial and organizational resources Electoral clout Voice strategies
DIVISIONS Division between potential winners and losers from liberalization •
Who controls the representation of the profession?
3
Implementation Scope Extent of actual implementation of liberalization measures considered important by professional actors
Speed Time elapsed from the liberalization deadline (2009)
4
The professions Taxi Owners
Tourist Guides
Outsiders United
Lawyers
Engineers
Insiders Divided
5
Liberalization and conflict
MEASURES OPPOSED BY PROFESSIONS OR OVER WHICH THERE WAS CONFLICT WITHIN THE PROFESSIONS
Taxi Owners •
Liberalization of taxi licences
Tourist Guides • •
Elimination of site-specific authorizations Closing of vocational schools
Lawyers
•
•
•
Elimination of geographical restrictions (supported by big-city practices) Elimination of minimum fees (supported by larger practices) Introduction of multidisciplinary practices (opposed by all)
Engineers
•
•
Opening the scope of activities for new specializations (opposed by established specializations) Opening the scope of activities for graduates of 4yr institutions (opposed by 5yr institutions) 6
Examples: tourist guides and engineers TOURIST GUIDES Limited organizational resources Unaware of proposed liberalization measures Unable to access government until SYRIZA’s victory in 2015 • • •
Elimination of geographical requirements (2010) Closing of vocational schools (2012) Reopening of vocational schools in 2017, but no longer a requirement to enter the profession
ENGINEERS Technical Chamber of Greece (TCG). Integral to State functions Controlled by established specializations (e.g. civil engineering) and 5-yr institutions. •
• •
•
Newer specializations tried to use conditionality to open up the jurisdictions of older specializations (2011) TCG and the Greek government allied to opposed conditionality (2011-2013) Independent report implemented so as to keep control of liberalization in the hands of the established professions (2014) Implementation rolled back starting in 2016
7
The findings
8
In other words… Power matters: Weaker professions are liberalized more fully and more quickly Divisions slow down the implementation of liberalization, regardless of who controls the representation of the profession
9
Thank you for your attention
10
References Stolfi, Francesco and Natalia Papamakariou (2021) “Border clashes: the distributive politics of professional liberalisation in Greece, 2010–2018” Journal of Public Policy 41 (1): 90-110
11