OECD Economic Surveys OECD Economic Surveys DENMARK DENMARK Executive Summary
NCH N
U
IO
• Macroeconomic policy has supported the recovery from the COVID crisis • Reforms would boost labour market inclusion and productivity • Climate policies need to be cost-effective and socially acceptable
LA
December 20212021 DECEMBER
VE S R
2 . OECD ECONOMIC SURVEY OF DENMARK – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Main findings Macroeconomic policies to support the recovery • The recovery is well established, with important downside risks from further virus outbreaks and upside risks from continued strong demand and labour market pressures. Fiscal tightening is planned for 2022, with DKK 4 billion (0.17% of GDP) set aside for COVID-related measures. • Fiscal policy is sustainable, but the Budget Law leaves little fiscal space to meet longer-term challenges. • Top income tax rates are among the highest in the OECD, with negative consequences for incentives to increase earnings by working more or further education. High taxes on capital income blunt incentives for entrepreneurship, investment and job creation. • An acceleration of house and equity prices amid high household debt is increasing macroeconomic and financial stability risks as the economy recovers. Boosting labour market inclusion and productivity • Female labour force participation is high and the gender wage gap low, but women still suffer a motherhood penalty and there are few women in leadership positions. • Benefits from immigration are hampered by the large gap in employment and education between immigrants and native Danes, with immigrants particularly badly affected by the COVID crisis. A climate strategy that minimises adverse economic consequences • Denmark’s ambitious domestic climate targets will be challenging to achieve, making complementary structural reforms important.
• The scope and evolution of carbon pricing is still to be defined and will not be implemented before 2023, delaying action and thus increasing costs to meet targets.
• Denmark’s business-friendly regulatory settings, labour market flexibility and reskilling policies will help unleash private investment and reallocation needed for the transition to net zero emissions. • Acceptability of climate mitigation policies can be hindered by fear of adverse distributional consequences. Distributional consequences from emission pricing can be offset by reducing high energy taxes. • The threat of carbon leakage can hinder action in some sectors and reduce policy effectiveness. Any compensation for affected firms should be delinked from their emissions to maintain incentives to reduce emissions per unit of production.
Cutting emissions from heating, transport and agriculture • All states and territories have now committed to achieving net zero carbon emissions by 2050. National carbon emissions need to decline on a significantly steeper trajectory if this goal is to be met. • Transport emissions remain high, in part because replacing the stock of conventional vehicles takes decades. • Emissions from agriculture are disproportionally high relative to the share of the sector in the economy and are among the most costeffective to reduce.
OECD ECONOMIC SURVEY OF DENMARK – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 3
Key recommendations Macroeconomic policies to support the recovery • Continue to withdraw exceptional COVID-related measures in 2022, as planned. • Be prepared to resume targeted support if an unexpected deterioration of the health situation threatens domestic and external demand. • Provide greater flexibility in the fiscal rule over the medium term by allowing a larger deficit, without threatening fiscal sustainability. • Reduce top income tax rates while offsetting revenue and distributional consequences by increasing taxes on owner-occupied housing and environmental harm. • Be ready to tighten macroprudential regulation if risks continue to build, for example by introducing general debt-to-income limits.
Boosting labour market inclusion and productivity • Implement planned increase in parental leave reserved for fathers and increase payment rates if take-up disappoints.
• Improve immigrant integration programmes by broader adoption of best practices across municipalities, especially for language training, and extension of the Integration Education Programme. A climate strategy that minimises adverse economic consequences • Continue the implementation of a well-balanced policy mix of pricing, regulatory measures, investment and structural reforms to cut domestic emissions. • Clarify and communicate the climate strategy at an early stage, so as to reduce policy uncertainty and encourage firms and households to prepare for upcoming changes. • Make emission pricing outside the EU Emissions Trading System more uniform by implementing a minimum price that reflects the evolution of prices in the EU Emissions Trading System. • Continue to undertake regulatory reform to facilitate market entry, competition and skill formation, such as for district heating, passenger rail and carbon capture and storage. • Offset distributional consequences of climate policy in a transparent manner via reduced taxation of renewable energy, means-tested transfers and support to labour-market reallocation. • Provide time-limited rebates of emission pricing based on production levels in emissions-intensive trade-exposed industries, informed by an institutionalised assessment of leakage rates. A second-best solution could be to provide time-limited subsidies for investment in abatement technologies, such as carbon capture and storage. Cutting emissions from heating, transport and agriculture • Better align incentives for woody biomass use with its climate and environmental impact. • Ease regulation of district heating to allow private investment to drive a shift towards new technologies, such as large capacity heat pumps. • Continue to encourage the shift towards low and zero-carbon vehicles, including with incentives to invest in recharging stations particularly in remote areas. • Prioritise action at the EU level and support further reform of the Common Agricultural Policy to include ambitious climate (and environmental) measures, and more particularly a large shift of EU subsidies from agricultural land to ecosystem services. in remote areas.
4 . OECD ECONOMIC SURVEY OF DENMARK – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Macroeconomic policy has supported the recovery from the COVID crisis Denmark used its large fiscal space when COVID-19 hit. Rapid action to support firms and households in spring 2020 and again in the winter contained the economic contraction to one of the mildest in Europe. Fast vaccine rollout enabled the removal of shutdown restrictions and an early reopening, though restrictions on the unvaccinated were reintroduced in late 2021 as Delta variant cases rose rapidly. Low interest rates and credit guarantees have also facilitated the recovery. Employment support has mitigated job losses. Unemployment increased by around 1 percentage point, less than in most EU countries. A temporary job retention scheme reduced the number of job losses while allowing people to quickly return to work once the economy improved.
Policy support should continue to be withdrawn where economic activity has recovered. The uncertain worldwide health and economic situation warrants ongoing flexibility in policy action. While employment has rebounded, structural measures should now be targeted at the youth, migrant workers, and low-educated.
Growth is projected ease to 2.4% in 2022 and 1.7% in 2023 (Table 1). Activity has rebounded fast, with GDP exceeding its prepandemic level by mid-2021 (Figure 1). Nevertheless, downside risks remain, notably further outbreaks domestically and abroad threatening domestic and external demand. On the upside, labour shortages have become widespread and household spending of excess saving during the crisis could see higher growth.
Fiscal space remains available to deploy public investment during the post-pandemic recovery. Denmark has ambitious plans to build back better once the outbreak is under control. Lowcarbon public investments are key aspects of the recovery strategy, together with transfers to households to protect inclusiveness. This will be enabled by available fiscal space if plans to prepare for an ageing society via strong indexation of retirement ages to life expectancy are fully implemented. Relaxation of the 0.5% structural deficit limit would provide space to address longer-term challenges, without threatening fiscal sustainability.
Table 1. A strong recovery in 2021 2021
2022
2023
Gross domestic product Unemployment rate Consumer price index Fiscal balance (% of GDP)
4.7 4.9 1.8 -1.5
2.4 4.2 2.6 0.3
1.7 4.2 2.3 0.8
Public debt (gross, Maastricht, %GDP)
39.8
38.4
38.0
Source: OECD, Economic Outlook 110 database.
Figure 1. The economy has recovered quickly
Source: OECD, Economic Outlook 110 database.
OECD ECONOMIC SURVEY OF DENMARK – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 5
Denmark’s tax system is overall well-designed, but the shift from income to less distortionary forms of taxation should continue. High top marginal tax rates on wage and capital income dull incentives for entrepreneurship, investment and increasing employment. Simultaneously increasing taxes on housing, with costs falling predominantly on high-income groups, would reduce negative distributional consequences. Monetary policy is strongly expansionary. Inflation has picked up due to energy price growth, while wage pressures remain contained despite labour shortages. The currency peg to the Euro has served Denmark well, but implies negative interest rates that could generate macroeconomic imbalances as the recovery proceeds. In particular, rapid house price growth and high household gross debt (Figure 2) exacerbate financial risks. Some features of the mortgage loan market are worrisome: high share of loans with variable interest rates or no repayments; comparatively low down payment requirements; and no absolute debt-to-income limit. Macro-prudential tightening would impact households without sufficient income to service their debt, increasing the importance of access to affordable social rental housing. Danish saving is already high, however, and reducing access to mortgages could increase the already large current account surplus.
Figure 2. Household gross debt is very high
Source: OECD, Economic Outlook 110 database.
Physical and transition risks associated with climate change could affect financial stability. The central bank has started to assess the exposure of banks to climate change. Though systemic risks in case of gradual increases in stringency of environmental policy are contained, other financial vulnerabilities are likely elsewhere in the financial system. More information and monitoring is necessary to assess these risks.
Reforms would boost labour market inclusion and productivity Denmark is well prepared to benefit from the digital transformation. Danish firms are leaders in adoption of digital tools, assisted by good broadband coverage, digital government services and digital skills. The benefits of new technologies could be spread more widely by supporting the growth of new firms through access to finance and reducing barriers to digital trade.
Danish women suffer from a significant drop in earnings after motherhood and are under-represented among managers. Increasing the share of parental leave reserved for the second parent, as planned, while increasing gender balance in leadership positions and offering greater flexibility in childcare services has the potential to improve equality and boost aggregate output. Benefits from immigration are held back by large gaps in employment and educational outcomes. Insufficient language skills remain a key barrier facing immigrants.
6 . OECD ECONOMIC SURVEY OF DENMARK – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Climate policies need to be cost-effective and socially acceptable Denmark cut its greenhouse gas emissions by 36% between 1990 and 2019, largely thanks to renewable energy (including biomass), which now accounts for over 80% of electricity generation. It is now one of the least carbon-intensive countries.
Emissions have been cut without overall employment losses. Workers displaced by stringent environmental policies have been helped by Denmark’s reskilling programmes, which demonstrated their capacity to cushion much larger displacements in manufacturing during the 2008 financial crisis. Thanks to this, Denmark has preserved full employment, with 75% of the working-age population having a job, one of the highest employment rates in the OECD. Denmark plans to halve its emissions over the next decade. The Climate Act sets the legally-binding objective of reducing emissions by 70% by 2030 from 1990. The target is one of the most ambitious among OECD countries and would put the country on track for carbon emissions neutrality by 2050 (Figure 3). However, this will require radical technological changes and vast resource reallocation. Greater certainty on how targets will be met is important to send strong signals to investors. Investment needs in the order of 1% to 2% of GDP will need to be funded, though could also carry long-term benefits if there is good project selection and incentives for private involvement.
Denmark’s well-functioning “flexicurity” facilitates reemployment of workers displaced by the energy transition. Jobs have already declined in fossil fuel generation, but new jobs were created in renewables. Projections of further abatement suggest that job losses in agriculture would be roughly matched by job creation elsewhere. Uniform carbon pricing would effectively mitigate emissions but needs to be complemented by flanking measures that provide a clear and predictable regulatory environment and support green infrastructure and innovation. Pricing all greenhouse gas emissions at a uniform minimum rate reflecting the evolution of prices in the EU Emissions Trading System would contribute to cost-effective abatement, though on its own would be insufficient to meet targets. Public acceptability for increased pricing is crucial and can be enhanced by transparent use of government revenue to support to the green transition, reskilling of workers and offsetting distributional effects. If high carbon prices cannot be sustained, the government will need other incentives to attract private investment and innovation in clean energy, as well as public investment in green infrastructure. Figure 3. Meeting targets will require accelerating progress in all sectors
Source: OECD, Economic Outlook 110 database.
OECD ECONOMIC SURVEY OF DENMARK – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 7
Denmark has made huge progress towards renewable energy (Figure 4). Through learning by doing, the cost of renewable energy has fallen considerably. Large investments are being made to progress further with low-carbon energy, supporting new technologies such as clean hydrogen and carbon storage. Emissions have been cut in district heating by switching from coal to biomass and the next step is to switch to other renewables and free up scarce supplies of sustainable biomass for other uses. Attracting private investment and enhancing competition would ensure that new technologies are commercially viable and affordable. Cutting transport emissions should continue to avoid leaving behind vulnerable groups. CO2 emissions from transport have not substantially declined so far (Figure 5). Denmark is encouraging take-up of vehicles using electricity, hydrogen and biogas, requiring large investments in charging and refuelling stations, including in remote areas. The overall taxation of vehicles should still reflect their external costs, including congestion, noise, road damage and local air pollution. Policies are needed to support those most adversely affected and offer alternatives to private car use including public transport, shared mobility, cycling and walking. Figure 4. Renewable generation has grown fast, but relies increasingly on biomass
Source: OECD, Economic Outlook 110 database.
Figure 5. Increasing car use has pushed up transport emissions despite greener vehicles
Source: OECD estimation based on EEA; Statistics Denmark; ITF.
Agriculture is a major and growing source of greenhouse gases, mainly from livestock. The sector has made little progress in cutting emissions so far. A recent agreement will enable emission cuts from low-hanging fruit such as rewetting of peatlands, with limited impact on activity while also reducing other environmental damages. Domestic regulation should focus on emission-intensive activities such as livestock and grain and detailed monitoring of farms’ emissions. This would make a substantial contribution to the 2030 target, reducing the burden on other sectors. Further investment for research and development could substantially enhance the contribution of agriculture to a net-zero target. However, agriculture is highly exposed to international trade and carbon leakage. Hence, Denmark should work with other EU member states towards greening the Common Agricultural Policy.
OECD Economic Surveys
DENMARK
The Danish economy has recovered quickly from the COVID-19 crisis. Rapid action to support firms and households contained the economic contraction to one of the mildest in Europe, while fast vaccine rollout enabled the removal of shutdown restrictions and an early reopening. Policy support should continue to be removed where activity has recovered, though the uncertain worldwide health and economic situation warrants ongoing flexibility. Monetary policy is set to remain strongly expansionary, increasing the importance of being ready to tighten macroprudential regulation if risks from rapid house price appreciation continue to build. The crisis was worse for the young, the foreign-born and those with low educational attainment and policy should support these groups. Further progress in reducing gender gaps is also a priority. Denmark has been a frontrunner in cutting its greenhouse gas emissions through a rapid shift to renewable energy and has set an ambitious legal commitment to reduce emissions by 70% by 2030 and reach carbon neutrality by 2050. Achieving these targets would contribute to global efforts to control climate change, but the transition will have large macroeconomic consequences and entail significant financial risk. This makes it crucial to adopt a cost-effective, inclusive and comprehensive strategy to cut emissions. SPECIAL FEATURE: CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY
oe.cd/denmark
© Shutterstock.com/ Nikolay Antonov (Cover page) @ Shutterstock.com/DC Studio (p.4) @ Shutterstock.com/Monkey Business Images (p.5) @ Shutterstock.com/Majeczka (p.6) @ Shutterstock.com/Wila_Image (p.7)