WMA MAINTENANCE
Good Maintenance Makes Good Neighbors FWP puts a high priority on controlling weeds, building fences, and managing timber on wildlife management areas across Montana. By Paul Queneau
KEEPING GRASS GREAT Most of Montana’s 68 wildlife management areas were purchased to provide winter habitat for elk and other species. To prevent invasive weeds from crowding out native plants like rough fescue, FWP maintenance crews regularly spray herbicides. Weed control also benefits neighboring landowners. 32 | NOVEMBER–DECEMBER 2020 | FWP.MT.GOV/MTOUTDOORS
LEFT: TIM CHRISTIE; RIGHT: PAUL QUENEAU
B
rady Shortman maneuvers his pickup invasive weeds. As is often the case, they were Noxious weeds are non-native plants that up a rutted forest road as we make mostly clustered along access roads. An initial crowd out native vegetation and generally our way to a spotted knapweed infes- survey when FWP purchased the property aren’t eaten by wildlife or livestock. tation in the high country of the Spotted Dog found that roughly 6 percent (2,000 acres) Depending on the species, invasive weeds Wildlife Management Area (WMA). was infested with knapweed, houndstongue, can also increase wildfire risk and erosion This 37,616-acre WMA between Avon and other noxious weeds. and even change soil chemistry. and Deer Lodge is a waffle-iron of They are detested by ridges and valleys covered in wildlife managers, ranchers, grassy savanna, bitterbrush, aspen, and farmers alike. and conifers climbing toward At Spotted Dog, wildlife the Continental Divide. In 2010 managers believed they could Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks greatly reduce the harmful acquired the property, which convegetation. Though the work tains the largest contiguous publicly would likely take years, it owned native grassland in western would allow native species like Montana, to protect and improve rough fescue to recover. habitat for the 183 species of Shortman is the maintewildlife that depend on it, includnance supervisor for several ing critical winter range for more major WMAs in western than 2,000 elk. Montana. As he rounds a But like many places in western dusty hairpin, we spot Adam Montana where, decades ago, Sieges, a member of Shortoverly aggressive logging and cattle man’s crew, FWP’s lead weed PREPARING FOR BATTLE FWP maintenance worker Shawn Smith grazing disturbed the soil, the propwarrior, and the agency liaimixes an herbicide in a four-wheeler sprayer at Spotted Dog Wildlife Management Area, parts of which are covered in spotted knapweed. erty came with extensive patches of son on the Montana Weed
MONTANA OUTDOORS | 33
Control Association board. Sieges’s truck is loaded with a tank of herbicide hooked to a gasoline-powered pump and 100 feet of hose coiled on a vertical wheel for easy deployment. As I snap photos, Sieges sprays a roadside patch of knapweed until all of it is tinted blue. The dye helps him see if he missed a spot. Down the road we inspect another patch of invasives sprayed several days earlier. The heads of knapweed, bull thistle, and mullein have curled over, indicating successful treatment. “We wait for just the right conditions Paul Queneau of Missoula is the conservation editor of Bugle, the magazine of the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, and a longtime contributor to Montana Outdoors.
to nail these things,” Shortman says. “We can’t do it if it’s just rained—or if it’s about to rain—because the herbicide won’t take, so we watch the weather like hawks. And when we get our window, it’s awfully satisfying to see the results. We’ve got some areas of invasives that we’ve treated two or three years in a row and seen them shrink by 75 percent.” That’s good not only for a WMA’s wildlife but also for its neighbors, who don’t want invasives spreading to their property. “The key to weed management is early detection and control to prevent spread into noninfested areas on a WMA or next door,” Shortman says. “That’s especially true for new invaders like yellow toadflax and leafy spurge. When hunters report seeing those, we get the GPS coordi-
34 | NOVEMBER–DECEMBER 2020 | FWP.MT.GOV/MTOUTDOORS
nates and jump on it immediately so they don’t get established like knapweed has.” WHIP IT GOOD FWP has been buying tracts of critical elk and other wildlife habitat from willing sellers since the 1940s. Today, Montana’s statewide system of 68 wildlife management areas (totaling 452,000 acres) secure some of the best game and nongame habitat and public access for hunting, wildlife watching, fishing, and other outdoor recreation. From the beginning, WMAs were created in large part to help neighboring landowners. Most were purchased to provide winter habitat for Montana’s growing number of elk while keeping the hungry animals off adjacent ranches. To further maintain
ALL PHOTOS: PAUL QUENEAU EXCEPT SUN RIVER WMA FENCE PHOTO BY CRAIG & LIZ LARCOM
GIVING WEEDS THE BLUES Regional WMA maintenance supervisor Brady Shortman (above left) and maintenance foreman Adam “Weed Warrior” Sieges spray knapweed beneath conifers. Left: Blue dye added to the herbicide lets applicators see where they missed. “You need to get it all,” says Shortman. “Otherwise you have another year’s worth of seeds in the ground and you’re back where you started.” Right: Dead thistles show the results of a previous herbicide application.
WMA MAINTENANCE
healthy relationships between the department and property owners next door, in 1999 the Montana Legislature and FWP created a “good neighbor” policy. These legal guidelines stipulate that the agency will maintain fences and signs around all boundaries, ensure access roads are maintained, and manage weeds and litter so they don’t spread to nearby properties. In similar fashion, the 2017 Legislature created the Montana Wildlife Habitat Improvement Program (WHIP). The program sets aside federal Pittman-Robertson (P-R) funds for large-scale wildlife habitat restoration by controlling noxious weeds across adjoining public and private properties. The legislation makes up to $2 million in P-R funds available each year and requires $1 in nonfederal matching funds for every $3 of federal funding. A WHIP advisory council reviews applications for grants from the program, which FWP administers. One major WHIP grant, for nearly $800,000, went to manage weeds across a 200-square-mile landscape of the Fish Creek drainage roughly 50 miles northwest of Missoula. The area includes private property, federal lands, and 41,000 acres that FWP purchased in 2010 from Plum Creek Timber Company and designated as a WMA,
a state park, and a fishing access site. The FWP property contains habitat for moose, elk, mule deer, and beavers, as well as bull trout and westslope cutthroat trout on the area’s namesake creek. Unfortunately, with an extensive road network built to accommodate past logging, the land was also heavily infested with knapweed, St. John’s wort, and other noxious weeds. Over the past two years, FWP and other land managers have used the WHIP grant to attack infestations by spraying herbicides and siccing predatory weevils on knapweed. “I just spent the last two days releasing bugs,” says Liz Bradley, FWP wildlife biologist in Missoula. “This weed control project has been a lot of work and has required a ton of planning, but already we can see we’re really making a difference.” GOOD FENCES Another way FWP acts neighborly is by maintaining perimeter fences on WMAs. For more than three decades, Mark Schlepp has led the WMA maintenance work along the Rocky Mountain Front and elsewhere in FWP’s Region 4. Now headquartered at Freezout Lake WMA, Schlepp grew up farming and ranching near Windham, and spent time as a kid hunting in and around the
nearby Judith River WMA. For half a century, he’s seen firsthand that good fences indeed make good neighbors. Each winter, elk by the hundreds or sometimes thousands move down from the Front’s high country in search of grass exposed on the windswept foothills of the Judith River, Sun River, Beartooth, Ear Mountain, and other major WMAs. Elk don’t recognize property boundaries and sometimes wander onto neighboring ranches, trampling fences along the way. Schlepp spends each spring and early summer making sure WMA boundary fences are upright and functioning, and that gates and temporary “lay down” fence segments are maintained and reconfigured so elk herds can move without causing damage. “During my tenure here, we’ve probably replaced or rebuilt 90 percent of our perimeter fences in Region 4,” he says of FWP’s central region. A three-person crew continually works on 300 to 400 miles of fence in a routine not unlike painting San Francisco’s Golden Gate Bridge; by the time they finish, they have to start all over again. Schlepp say that even though perimeter fences benefit adjacent landowners, FWP pays for most construction and maintenance. Some fences cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to rebuild or replace. “We don’t go to
SETTING BOUNDARIES FWP maintains fences around all or part of its WMAs to prevent cattle from adjacent properties from entering, and to indicate boundaries so hunters don’t inadvertently trespass on neighboring land. Fences generally aren’t needed where WMAs abut national forests.
MONTANA OUTDOORS | 35
COWS ARE SOMETIMES WELCOME On some WMAs, FWP partners with neighboring ranchers to allow rotational cattle grazing. When done correctly, grazing can remove old, dead vegetation and reinvigorate plant growth, benefiting cows as well as elk and other wildlife.
our neighbors and ask to split the cost. We take care of it. And that’s huge when it comes to maintaining goodwill,” he says. Montanans’ state taxes aren’t tapped, either. Almost all of the money used to maintain WMAs comes out of the Habitat Montana Fund, mostly drawn from nonresident big game license sales. In other words, the money that deer and elk generate goes back to supporting some of their best habitats. Launched in 1987, the Habitat Montana Fund allocates its dollars so that 80 percent is available for buying conservation easements or WMAs from willing landowners to protect habitat and provide public access. The other 20 percent is set aside for maintenance, with half paying for immediate needs and the rest invested in a trust. As that trust has grown over the years, it provides increasingly larger interest payments to ensure a predictable revenue stream for WMA upkeep. “We’re proud to have developed a funding source that will be there forever to help maintain these properties,” Ken McDonald, head of the FWP Wildlife Division, says. Another WMA maintenance challenge is keeping interior roads accessible not only for hunters and FWP crews but for other
recreationists and agencies that use the Some of the harvest projects are even routes. At Spotted Dog, Shortman says “cash positive,” meaning they generate more crews recently finished grading a road up to money through the sale of wood products Rocky Ridge. The high-elevation section is than what it costs to do the logging. owned by the Montana Department of NatBut the priority for WMA timber harvest is ural Resources and leased to FWP, except wildlife, and it often involves cutting down for a small parcel containing towers leased smaller Douglas fir, lodgepole pine, and other to communications companies. “Their conifers expanding across grasslands and crews need decent roads so they can main- shrublands so important for deer, moose, and tain those towers,” Shortman says. other species. Shortman is also working with the U.S. Parke supervises the Elk Basin RestoraForest Service to find funding to improve an tion Project on the Blackfoot-Clearwater existing route that would allow firefighters WMA south of Seeley Lake. The wildlife easier access along the east side of the WMA management area winters up to 1,000 elk so any possible fire wouldn’t spread next that visit from the nearby Bob Marshall door. “Again, it’s work we’re doing to be as Wilderness. It offers superb forage, espegood a neighbor as possible,” he says. cially within scattered aspen stands and expansive rolling grasslands. Both the LOGGING FOR WILDLIFE (AND aspen and grasslands are being overrun in LOCAL EMPLOYMENT) places by conifers, which crews have begun Sometimes WMA maintenance pays divi- cutting. Parke says the value of the logs will dends beyond strengthening neighborly rela- help offset the costs of habitat improvement tions. In 2015, FWP hired Jason Parke as the and fuels reduction, such as removing small department’s first and only forester. He’s trees with no commercial value from grassoverseeing more than 30 forest management lands and aspen stands and piling and burnprojects on WMAs and other department ing slash to remove fuel hazards. properties, including several prescribed One “good neighbor” component of timber harvests that improve wildlife habitat. WMA timber management is that it can
36 | NOVEMBER–DECEMBER 2020 | FWP.MT.GOV/MTOUTDOORS
WMA MAINTENANCE
CLOCKWISE FROM TOP LEFT: PAUL QUENEAU; MONTANA FWP; PAUL QUENEAU
reduce the risk of wildfire on a WMA that might spread to nearby properties. Another comes from providing work for Montana timber companies. On one BlackfootClearwater project, crews from Bull Creek Forestry thinned understory beneath centuries-old ponderosa pine and Douglas fir, and removed one million board feet of saleable timber. The project provided
approximately 2,800 days of work for local loggers, truck drivers, and mill workers. In addition to timber harvest, fence management, road improvements, and weed control, FWP also does work purely to benefit wildlife on WMAs. Crews conduct prescribed burns to reinvigorate grasslands, plant shelterbelts for winter cover, control water levels on ponds to improve
aquatic habitat for waterfowl and shorebirds, and cost-share with nearby farmers to plant food plots. But the good-neighbor work is equally important to wildlife. “If we don’t maintain good relations with the people living next to WMAs, it’s tough to convince legislators that investing in additional wildlife property is a smart thing for us to do,” McDonald says.
BOUNTIFUL BENEFITS Managed logging, like here on the Nevada Lake WMA near Helmville, can open up dense forest to sunlight, prevent encroaching conifers from overtaking grasslands, and reduce wildfire risk on the FWP lands and adjoining private parcels.
Neighborly parks and fishing access sites
PURPLE PEST Spraying spotted knapweed at a fishing access site near Billings.
FWP also works to be a good neighbor by managing invasive plants on state parks and fishing access sites. To keep weeds from spreading, FWP crews mow, pull, and dig some plants while using herbicides, biological control (weed-eating insects), and targeted livestock grazing on others. Scott Harvey, statewide asset and facility manager for Montana’s state parks, says he coordinates about 1,700 acres of noxious weed management each year. As on WMAs, spotted knapweed is Enemy No. 1 for state parks. “For example, we’ve been working with the neighboring landowner at Lost Creek State Park who has a major knapweed infestation on his property that threatened the park’s native plant communities,” Harvey says. The landowner purchased and helped release 600 root-boring weevils on his property and the park perimeter. The Deer Lodge–Anaconda County Weed Control Department chipped in to help. “[The weevils] have definitely made a big dent in the knapweed along the property boundary, creating a weed-free buffer,” Harvey says. n
MONTANA OUTDOORS | 37