Loughs Agency Foyle, Carlingford and Irish Lights Commission Pre-Fishery Stock Assessment Lough Foyle Native Oyster Fishery Summary Report Autumn 2016
1
Aquaculture & Shellfisheries
____________________________________ Report Reference LA/0Y/0216
Version No. 1 2
Author CMG CMG
Date Issued 03/10/16 07/10/16
Amendments
Approved by
1st draft for comment BF Format and minor BF amendments
Prepared by: Ciarán McGonigle/Catherine Jordan/Rachel Scott/Kelsie Geddis
The Loughs Agency (Foyle Carlingford and Irish Lights Commission)
For further information contact: Loughs Agency 22, Victoria Road Prehen Derry/Londonderry BT47 2AB Tel: 028 71 342100 Fax: 028 71 342720 email:general@loughs-agency.org
Loughs Agency D’arcy Magee Court Dundalk Street Carlingford Co Louth Tel: 042 93 83 888 Fax: 042 93 83 888 email:carlingford@loughsagency.org
www.loughs-agency.org
1
Contents 1.
Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ 5
2.
Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 6
3.
Methods.................................................................................................................................. 6
4.
Oyster Density ........................................................................................................................ 7
5.
Biomass Estimate ................................................................................................................... 8
6.
Spatfall .................................................................................................................................... 8
7.
Mortality Levels .................................................................................................................... 10
8.
Population Structure ............................................................................................................ 10
9.
Oyster Bed Review ............................................................................................................... 13
9.1
The Perch .............................................................................................................................. 13
9.2 The Flat Ground ....................................................................................................................... 15 9.3 Quigley’s Point ......................................................................................................................... 17 9.4 Middle Bed South .................................................................................................................... 19 9.5 Southside North ....................................................................................................................... 21 9.6 Southside South ....................................................................................................................... 23 10.
Conclusions ........................................................................................................................... 25
2
List of Figures Figure 1 Harvestable Biomass (t) on Foyle oyster beds autumn 2016 ................................................... 5 Figure 2 Methods used during survey .................................................................................................... 6 Figure 3 Interpolated oyster density in Lough Foyle Spring 2016 .......................................................... 7 Figure 4 Length Frequency of oysters in Lough Foyle 2015-2016 .......................................................... 9 Figure 5 Oyster Spat Density in Lough Foyle 2016.................................................................................. 9 Figure 6 Overall mortality recorded in Lough Foyle Autumn 2016 ...................................................... 10 Figure 7 Length Frequency of Lough Foyle oysters 2007 & 2016 ......................................................... 11 Figure 8 Cumulative Frequency across all oyster beds in Lough Foyle 2015-2016 .............................. 11 Figure 9 Length classes on oyster beds Lough Foyle 2016 ................................................................... 12 Figure 10 Size class on each bed in Lough Foyle 2016 .......................................................................... 12 Figure 11 Proportional Length Frequency The Perch 2015-16 ............................................................. 13 Figure 12 Cumulative Frequency: The Perch 2015-2016 ...................................................................... 14 Figure 13 Percentage of length classes: The Perch 2016...................................................................... 14 Figure 14 Proportional Length Frequency: Flat Ground 2014-16 ......................................................... 15 Figure 15 Cumulative Frequency: Flat Ground 2015-2016 ................................................................... 16 Figure 16 Percentage of each length class: Flat Ground 2016.............................................................. 16 Figure 17 Proportional Length Frequency Quigley's Point 2015-16 ..................................................... 17 Figure 18 Cumulative Frequency: Quigley's point 2015-2016 .............................................................. 18 Figure 19 Percentage of length classes: Quigley’s Point 2016.............................................................. 18 Figure 20 Proportional Length Frequency Middle bed 2015-16........................................................... 19 Figure 21 Cumulative Frequency Middle Bed 2015-2016..................................................................... 20 Figure 22 Percentage of length classes Middle Bed 2016 .................................................................... 20 Figure 23 Proportional Length Frequency Southside (N) 2015-16 ....................................................... 21 Figure 24 Cumulative Frequency Southside (N) 2015-2016 ................................................................. 22 Figure 25 Percentage of length classes: Southside (N) 2016 ................................................................ 22 Figure 26 Length Frequency Southside (S) 2015-16 ............................................................................. 23 Figure 27 Cumulative Frequency Southside (S) 2015-2016 .................................................................. 24 Figure 28 Percentage of length classes: Southside (S) 2016................................................................. 24
3
List of Tables Table 1 Oyster biomass per oyster bed in Lough Foyle Spring 2016 ...................................................... 8 Table 2 Summary Information: The Perch ............................................................................................ 13 Table 3 Summary Information: The Flat Ground .................................................................................. 15 Table 4 Summary Information: Quigley's Point .................................................................................... 17 Table 5 Summary Information: Middle Bed South ............................................................................... 19 Table 6 Summary Information: Southside North .................................................................................. 21
4
1. Executive Summary A pre-fishery stock assessment was conducted on oyster beds in Lough Foyle during autumn 2016. The results of this survey are in keeping with the results of the post-season survey with continued evidence of the cohort of oysters that settled in Lough Foyle in late summer 2014. The harvestable biomass of oysters on all oyster beds is estimated to be 174 tonnes (Figure 1). Landings from the fishery in the 2015/16 season amounted to just over 69 tonnes. The total biomass of oysters on these beds has improved relative to the spring situation thanks largely to a very good growing season in 2016. The 2 year old oysters in the cohort that settled in late summer 2014 have grown as much as 40mm in 2016 and some have already reached 80mm however the vast majority are less than 35g in weight at this point in time. There was no evidence of a widespread spatfall in 2016. It is recommended that the fishery does not remove the total harvestable biomass in the 2016/17 season. This will help to prevent the loss of an effective spawning stock for the 2017 spawning period.
Figure 1 Harvestable Biomass (t) on Foyle oyster beds autumn 2016
5
2. Introduction A pre-fishery survey of the native oyster beds in Lough Foyle took place in September 2016. This survey was conducted by Agency staff on board local fishing vessels.
3. Methods A dredge survey was carried out in Lough Foyle using 4 local fishing vessels. Scientific staff from the Loughs Agency assessed the population distribution and abundance by analysing dredge contents from each sample location (figure 2A-B). Oyster density is calculated by dividing the area dredged (m2) by the total number of oysters after adjusting for dredge efficiency (25%) and any sub-sampling. Dredge efficiency has been taken from the work done in Lough Foyle during the Baseline Survey of Shellfish Resources conducted by Cefas in 2006. Oyster density is interpolated across the oyster beds using a six point IDW method and this allows a biomass figure to be calculated based on the area (m2) of the oyster bed within each density category. This follows the approach of similar work conducted in Irish oyster fishery stock assessments conducted by the Marine Institute. The average weight of the oysters on each bed is used to factor up to an overall biomass based on mean density within each bed. Any fresh dead oysters are recorded as a measure of recent mortality, these exhibit no fouling on the inner surface of the shell valves. Oyster spat (<20mm) presence or absence was recorded at each sample point as was total numbers of spat per dredge sample. A
B
Figure 2 Methods used during survey: (A) Analysing and recording dredge contents. (B) Oysters are measured for length frequency analysis
6
4. Oyster Density Oyster density has been recorded at each of the dredge locations in the fishery (figure 3). The mean density for all beds is 0.38 oysters/m2. This figure is higher than previous post fishery surveys conducted in autumn each year likely as a result of the spatfall from 2014 now entering into the adult size classes and bolstering the adult biomass figure. It is also possible that the densities recorded during this survey are an overestimate as a result of very high water temperatures in 2016 which appears to have had an impact on the dredge efficiency on certain beds. These types of extremely high densities relative to previous surveys were also observed in 2011 after a similar period of high water temperatures. Highest density was observed on the Flat Ground with a maximum density of 5.8 oysters/m2. Oyster density recorded from each dredge tow has been represented as point data and then interpolated using a 6 point IDW methodology. The interpolation has been performed only in areas of the oyster beds that were surveyed and have point data present. A barrier feature has been placed within the interpolation between the oyster beds in or to the north of the navigation channel and all beds on the east of the navigation channel to help replicate the impacts of a natural barrier (a sandbank) between the beds in this area.
Figure 3 Interpolated oyster density in Lough Foyle Spring 2016
7
5. Biomass Estimate It has been estimated that the Foyle oyster population biomass is 615 tonnes in total (table 1). This is an increase from the estimated biomass of 366 tonnes in autumn 2015. Total stock biomass above 80mm is currently estimated to be 174 tonnes. The total stock biomass is high relative to previous years and this is likely due to good growth in the younger cohort of oysters that settled in late summer 2014. These oysters have now attained a length of around 60-80mm however they are still mostly less than 40g in weight making them less marketable. Average weight was lower in 2016 than previous seasons due to the large shell growth rates experienced on many beds. Table 1 Oyster biomass per oyster bed in Lough Foyle Spring 2016
Bed name Barney's Bank Black Ghee Drumskellan Flat Ground Great Bank McGhee Middle North Middle South Moville Peak Perch Quigley'sPt Redcastle Sandy Ridge Shooting Range Southside North Southside South Total
Area (ha) 200 236 91 970 827 167 228 531 250 208 276 141 164 474 215 235 343
Mean Length (mm) 75.5 73.5 78.5 70.8 79.2 72.4 78.2 70.7 78.2 71.24 70.78 71.2 71.7 81.6 74.3 73.1 74.4
Bed Total (t) 1.08 8.86 9.84 206.82 71.92 9.01 2.50 94.61 9.48 10.48 37.33 24.00 2.06 9.28 12.08 42.62 63.47 615.43
Total (t) >80mm 0.54 4.87 4.03 38.88 32.15 5.50 1.25 22.61 4.17 2.41 8.44 5.47 0.85 5.15 5.92 11.21 20.63 174.08
6. Spatfall Oyster spawning and larval survival is thought to be heavily dependent on good environmental conditions throughout the spring and summer and the threshold water temperature values being exceeded for a minimum period of time, usually 16⁰C for 2-4 weeks. If these conditions do not occur it is expected that spawning will be limited to a small percentage of the stock on each bed and the numbers of juveniles will be minimal. Spawning is also limited by oyster density 8
and proximity of each individual oyster to another has an impact on fertilisation success. Removal of oysters during the fishing season reduces the oyster density. Poor spawning and settlement was observed in the 2012, 2013 and 2015 spawning seasons and no widespread spatfall was observed in 2016 (Figure 5). The spat from 2014 has now progressed to be between 45-75mm in size (see figure 4).
Length Frequency Lough Foyle 2015 - 2016 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
Autumn 2016
Spring 2016
Autumn 2015
Figure 4 Length Frequency of oysters in Lough Foyle 2015-2016
Figure 5 Oyster Spat Density in Lough Foyle 2016
9
7. Mortality Levels There was very limited evidence of recent mortality on the oyster beds (figure 6). Mortality was recorded in 3.3% of the samples taken and the majority of these appeared to due to natural causes. The latest Bonamia test results show infection rates of between 0-30% on the beds and this may result in elevated mortality levels if the intensity of the infection is high.
Figure 6 Overall mortality recorded in Lough Foyle Autumn 2016
8. Population Structure The length frequency of the oyster population suggest that the proportion of larger size classes has increased since the 2007 stock survey. The 2007 results show there was poor representation of oysters 75mm and above in the population. In the years since the regulation of the fishery in 2008 there has been greater evidence of larger oysters within the population (see figure 7). The larger oysters are an important resource within the population. These make up the majority of the spawning stock biomass. Although oysters as small as 35mm are capable of spawning, the larger oysters are capable of producing large quantities of larvae for the fishery, and are therefore of great importance. If there is a higher percentage of large oysters present in the population along with suitable environmental conditions there is a greater chance of spawning success. The overall sampled population consists of 59% above 71mm. Figure 7 highlights the bias towards larger length classes as a result of poor recruitment in 2015 and 2016. 10
Proportional Frequency 2007 & 2016 25 20 15 10 5 0
Autumn 2007
Autumn 2016
Figure 7 Length Frequency of Lough Foyle oysters 2007 & 2016
The cumulative length frequency (figure 8) shows the gradual growth in smaller size oysters with a shift of the line to the right in the all length classes as a result of good growing conditions and the absence of fishing removal of larger length classes since 2015.
Cumulaive Frequency Lough Foyle 2015-2016 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
Autumn 2016
Spring 2016
Autumn 2015
Figure 8 Cumulative Frequency across all oyster beds in Lough Foyle 2015-2016
The pie chart in figure 9 shows a bias towards larger size classes within the stock as a result of limited recruitment of juveniles into the stock in the past 2 spawning seasons. This is likely to lead to a reduction in the fishable stock size in the 2019/20 season.
11
Length classes Lough Foyle Autumn 2016 3%
1%
2%
6%
1-20 (mm)
11%
21-30 (mm) 31-40 (mm)
18%
41-50 (mm) 51-60 (mm) 27%
61-70 (mm) 71-80 (mm) 81-90 (mm) 91-100 (mm) 101+ (mm)
32%
Figure 9 Length classes on oyster beds Lough Foyle 2016
Figure 10 illustrates the percentage of each length class on the oyster beds in Lough Foyle. This chart highlights the differences between beds in terms of the health of their stock structure. The beds which consistently produce commercially important quantities of oysters (Middle Bed, Perch, Flat Ground) have got good representation of most length classes from 41mm101mm+ whilst other less productive beds (Middle Bottom, Moville) are heavily skewed towards the older age classes highlighting the lack of consistent spat settlements on these beds.
Length class Lough Foyle oyster beds 2016 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
1-20mm
21-30mm
31-40mm
41-50mm
51-60mm
61-70mm
71-80mm
81-90mm
91-100mm
101mm+
Figure 10 Size class on each bed in Lough Foyle 2016
12
9. Oyster Bed Review 9.1 The Perch Table 2 Summary Information: The Perch
Bed Name
Perch
Area (h)
276.1
Total Biomass (t)
37.33
Biomass (t) >80mm
8.44
The Perch is one of the 5 main commercially fished oyster beds with the highest density in Lough Foyle and it covers an area of 276 hectares. The overall biomass estimated for this bed is 37.3 tonnes, 8.4 tonnes of that figure is currently above market size of 80mm and is available to the fishery. 8.8 tonnes were landed from this bed during the fishing season of 2015/16. The length Frequency for the Perch shows there is a notably higher percentage of 77- 87mm oysters recorded during the autumn 2016 survey than the spring survey, this shows the growth progression during 2016. There was only a small percentage of oysters <20mm recorded during the survey due to a relatively unsuccessful spawning season (Figure 11).
Proportional Length Frequency Perch Autumn 2014 - Autumn 2016 Autumn 2016
Spring 2016
Autumn 2015
Proportional Frequency
25 20 15 10 5 0
Length Class Midpoint
Figure 11 Proportional Length Frequency The Perch 2015-16
13
Cumulative Frequency Perch 2015 - 2016 Cumulative Frequency
120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1-20 (mm)
21-30 (mm)
31-40 (mm)
41-50 (mm)
Autumn 2016
51-60 (mm)
61-70 (mm)
Spring 2016
71-80 (mm)
81-90 (mm)
91-100 (mm)
101+ (mm)
Autumn 2015
Figure 12 Cumulative Frequency: The Perch 2015-2016
Perch Length Classes Autumn 2016 4%
1%
1% 1%
2% 1-20 (mm)
14%
21-30 (mm)
18%
31-40 (mm) 41-50 (mm) 51-60 (mm) 61-70 (mm) 24%
71-80 (mm) 81-90 (mm) 91-100 (mm)
35%
101+ (mm)
Figure 13 Percentage of length classes: The Perch 2016
14
9.2 The Flat Ground Table 3 Summary Information: The Flat Ground
Bed Name
Flat Ground
Area (h)
970
Total Biomass (t)
206.82
Biomass (t) >80mm
38.88
The Flat Ground covers an area of 970 hectares. Total stock biomass for this bed is estimated to be 206 tonnes. 38.8 tonnes is above market size therefore harvestable biomass. 14.6 tonnes of oysters were landed from the Flat Ground during the 2015/16 season. The length frequency (figure 14) shows very little spat (<20mm) was recorded during the survey but that a substantial amount was recorded during the 2014 survey and again this spatfall was recorded during the spring 2015 survey. The growth progression of the 2014 spat is observed in the data with an increase from an average of 12.5mm to an average of 35mm in autumn 2015 with another increase again to over 67mm in autumn 2016. In keeping with the overall length frequencies there is good representation of older age classes which would not have been recorded in the stock assessments during the period 2007-2010.
Proportional Length Frequency Flatground 2014 - 2016 Autumn 2016
Autumn 2015
Spring 2015
Proportional Frequency
25 20 15 10 5 0
Length Class Midpoint
Figure 14 Proportional Length Frequency: Flat Ground 2014-16
15
Autumn 2014
The cumulative frequency (Figure 15) for the stock on the Flat Ground shows the rapid growth in the smallest length classes since the spring survey with the majority of the population now above 50mm on this bed.
Cumulative Frequency Flat Gorund 2015-2016
Cumulative Frequency
120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1-20 (mm)
21-30 (mm)
31-40 (mm)
Autumn 2016
41-50 (mm)
51-60 (mm)
61-70 (mm)
71-80 (mm)
81-90 (mm)
Autumn 2015
91-100 (mm)
101+ (mm)
Spring 2015
Figure 15 Cumulative Frequency: Flat Ground 2015-2016
The pie chart (Figure 16) also draws attention to the fact that the smaller size classes are not represented on this bed and the vast majority of the population on the bed is more than 50mm in size.
Flatground Length Classes Autumn 2016 3%
1% 0% 0% 1%
14%
3%
1-20 (mm)
11%
21-30 (mm) 31-40 (mm) 41-50 (mm) 51-60 (mm) 61-70 (mm) 71-80 (mm) 34%
33%
81-90 (mm) 91-100 (mm) 101+ (mm)
Figure 16 Percentage of each length class: Flat Ground 2016
16
9.3 Quigley’s Point Table 4 Summary Information: Quigley's Point
Bed Name
Quigley’s Point
Area (h)
140.6
Total Biomass (t)
24
Biomass (t) >80mm
5.47
Quigley’s point covers an area of 140.6 hectares. The total biomass has been estimated to be 24 tonnes on this bed with 5.47 tonnes above the market size of 80mm. 2.93 tonnes were landed from Quigley’s bed during the fishing season of 2015/16. The length frequency for Quigley’s Point (figure 17) shows limited evidence of any spatfall on the bed. The cohort that settled in 2014 has now attained a size of between 62-72mm on average and should recruit into the fishery from 2017-18 onwards.
Proportional Length Frequency Quigleys Point Autumn 2016
Spring 2016
Autumn 2015
Proportional Frequency
25 20 15 10 5 0
Length Class Midpoint
Figure 17 Proportional Length Frequency Quigley's Point 2015-16
The cumulative frequency (Figure 18) again highlights the reduction in the proportion of the stock in the smaller size classes on this bed. Only 15% of the stock is less than 50mm in size.
17
Cumulative Frequency Quigley's Point 2015 - 2016 Cumulative Frequency
120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1-20 (mm)
21-30 (mm)
31-40 (mm)
41-50 (mm)
Autumn 2016
51-60 (mm)
61-70 (mm)
Spring 2016
71-80 (mm)
81-90 (mm)
91-100 (mm)
101+ (mm)
Autumn 2015
Figure 18 Cumulative Frequency: Quigley's point 2015-2016
Figure 19 shows the proportion of each length class on the bed. It is clear that smaller size classes are missing from this bed as is the case on many other beds in 2016. The market sized stock makes up 23% of the total population.
Quigley's Point Length Classes Autumn 2016 1%
1% 0%
0% 2%
5% 1-20 (mm)
12%
21-30 (mm)
17%
31-40 (mm) 41-50 (mm) 51-60 (mm) 61-70 (mm) 31%
71-80 (mm) 81-90 (mm) 91-100 (mm)
31%
101+ (mm)
Figure 19 Percentage of length classes: Quigley’s Point 2016
18
9.4 Middle Bed South Table 5 Summary Information: Middle Bed South
Bed Name
Middle Bed South
Area (h)
531.2
Total Biomass (t)
94.61
Biomass (t) >80mm
22.61
The south section of the Middle Bed covers an area of 531.2 hectares. There is an estimated total biomass of 94.6 tonnes on this bed and 22.61 tonnes of that figure is of market size. The length frequency for the Middle Bed South (figure 20) shows that the majority of oysters on this bed are now over 50mm indicating poor juvenile recruitment in 2015 and 2016.
Proportional Length Frequency Middle Bed 2015 - 2016
Proportional Frequency
Autumn 2016
Spring 2016
Autumn 2015
18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
Length Class Midpoint
Figure 20 Proportional Length Frequency Middle bed 2015-16
The cumulative frequency (Figure 21) shows an increase in the proportion of larger length classes since the spring 2015 survey. This movement reflects the poor juvenile recruitment experienced on the bed in 2016. The pie chart (Figure 22) reinforces this fact with only 12% of the stock less than 50mm in size highlighting the deficiency in spatfall in the previous 2 seasons.
19
Cumulative Frequency Middle Bed 2015 - 2016 Cumulative Frequency
120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1-20 (mm)
21-30 (mm)
31-40 (mm)
41-50 (mm)
Autumn 2016
51-60 (mm)
61-70 (mm)
Spring 2016
71-80 (mm)
81-90 (mm)
91-100 (mm)
101+ (mm)
Autumn 2015
Figure 21 Cumulative Frequency Middle Bed 2015-2016
Middlebed Length Classes Autumn 2016 4%
0% 0% 0% 1% 11%
11%
1-20 (mm) 21-30 (mm) 31-40 (mm) 41-50 (mm) 21%
22%
51-60 (mm) 61-70 (mm) 71-80 (mm) 81-90 (mm) 91-100 (mm) 101+ (mm)
30%
Figure 22 Percentage of length classes Middle Bed 2016
20
9.5 Southside North Table 6 Summary Information: Southside North
Bed Name
Southside North
Area (h)
235
Total Biomass (t)
42.6
Biomass (t) >80mm
11.2
The North area of the Southside bed covers an area of 235 hectares. The overall biomass on this bed is estimated to be 42.6 tonnes, 11.2 tonnes of this figure represent oysters over 80mm in length. The length frequency (figure23) shows very limited evidence of any settlement in 2015 or 2016 with a very small proportion of the stock less than 40mm. The spatfall from 2014 has now progressed into the 45-65mm age classes.
Proportional Length Frequency Southside (N) 2015-2016 Autumn 2016
Spring 2016
Autumn 2015
18
Cumulative Frequency
16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
Length Class Midpoint
Figure 23 Proportional Length Frequency Southside (N) 2015-16
21
Cumulative Frequency Southside (N) 2015 - 2016 cu,ulative Frequency
120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1-20 (mm) 21-30 (mm)
31-40 (mm)
41-50 (mm)
Autumn 2016
51-60 (mm)
61-70 (mm)
Spring 2016
71-80 (mm)
81-90 (mm)
91-100 (mm)
101+ (mm)
Autumn 2015
Figure 24 Cumulative Frequency Southside (N) 2015-2016
Southside (N) Length Classes Autumn 2016 2%
1%
0%
0%
5%
3%
1-20 (mm)
13%
21-30 (mm) 31-40 (mm)
19%
41-50 (mm) 51-60 (mm) 61-70 (mm) 25%
71-80 (mm) 81-90 (mm) 91-100 (mm)
32%
101+ (mm)
Figure 25 Percentage of length classes: Southside (N) 2016
22
9.6 Southside South Bed Name
Southside South
Area (h)
343
Total Biomass (t)
63.4
Biomass (t) >80mm
20.6
The south section of the Southside bed covers 343.0 hectares in total. The overall biomass of oysters calculated during the autumn 2015 survey was 32.15 tonnes and 4.73 tonnes of this figure is currently above 80mm therefore available to the fishery for the 2016/17 season. Again, like the length frequency for the northern section of the Southside there was little or no evidence of spat (<20mm) recorded for this survey but clear evidence of a late spatfall in 2014 which was picked up again during this survey. The survival of this spat is evident in the 4055mm ages classes and this represents the growth progression of the spat. Also like the northern section of the Southside there is a poor representation of older >100mm ages classes on this section of the bed (see figure 31). Out of the oysters that measured above market size (80mm) in autumn 2015 26% weighed <60g (see figure 32).
Proportional Length Frequency Southside (S) Autumn 2016
Proportional Frequecy
Autumn 2016
Spring 2016
Autumn 2015
18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
Length Class Midpoint
Figure 26 Length Frequency Southside (S) 2015-16
23
Cumulative Frequency Southside (South) Spring 2015 - 2016
Cumulative Frequency
120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1-20 (mm)
21-30 (mm)
31-40 (mm)
41-50 (mm)
Autumn 2016
51-60 (mm)
61-70 (mm)
71-80 (mm)
Spring 2016
81-90 (mm)
91-100 (mm)
101+ (mm)
Autumn 2015
Figure 27 Cumulative Frequency Southside (S) 2015-2016
Southside (S) Length Classes 3%
0% 0% 0… 2% 11%
10%
1-20 (mm) 21-30 (mm) 31-40 (mm) 41-50 (mm)
20%
51-60 (mm) 26%
61-70 (mm) 71-80 (mm) 81-90 (mm) 91-100 (mm) 101+ (mm)
28%
Figure 28 Percentage of length classes: Southside (S) 2016
24
10. Conclusions The total biomass estimated for the stock is an increase on the estimates made in spring and autumn 2016. There is evidence that the late spatfall of 2014 survived well but not much evidence to say there was a widespread settlement in 2016. It was felt during the survey that the dredge efficiency was unusually high on some beds and this may have resulted in overestimates in some areas. It remains to be seen if the estimated biomass above 80mm is removed during the fishing season and whether Catch Per Unit Effort is unusually high in the first few weeks of the fishing season. Total landings for the fishing season of 2015-16 came to a total of 69 tonnes, a decrease from the previous year’s landings of 167 tonnes. 82% of the total landings came from 4 of the main beds: The Middle bed (33%), Perch (13%), Southside (14%) and the Flat Ground (21%). The highest recorded landings for the previous season were from the Middle bed (33%) showing an increase in landings from that bed this year. The overall length frequency for the surveyed stock shows the length class has progressed and now the majority of the stock is >70mm. If a percentage of this stock is left behind and environmental conditions are favourable in summer 2017 there is a greater chance of a successful spawning event and recruitment into the fishery. It is recommended that the fishery does not remove the total harvestable biomass in the 2016/17 season. This will help to prevent to limit the loss of an effective spawning stock for the 2017 spawning period.
11.Recommendations Consider partial removal of the harvestable stock biomass to help alleviate pressure on the stock from fishing activity and help sustain an effective spawning broodstock.
25
Appendix I. Raw data from interpolated density data and biomass estimates
Area (m2)
Mean density (m2)
No. of Oysters
Total Biomass (tonnes)
95% CL Biomass (tonnes)
4
902201.98
0.001
902
0.04
na
0.01001 - 0.05000
2
1094459.97
0.021
23127
1.04
0.68
Barneys
0.05001 - 0.10000
0
0.00
na
0
0
0
Barneys
0.10001 - 0.50000
0
0.00
na
0
0
0
Barneys
0.50001 - 1.00000
0
0.00
na
0
0
0
Barneys
1.00001 - 2.50000
0
0.00
na
0
0
0
Barneys
2.50001 - 5.00000
0
0.00
na
0
0
0
Drumskellan
0 - 0.01000
5
21192.04
0.001
21
0.00
na
Drumskellan
0.01001 - 0.05000
0
75300.99
0.010
753
0.03
na
Drumskellan
0.05001 - 0.10000
2
271480.33
0.083
22623
1.02
1.26
Drumskellan
0.10001 - 0.50000
3
489280.21
0.318
155439
6.99
2.15
Drumskellan
0.50001 - 1.00000
1
48178.81
0.842
40578
1.83
na
Drumskellan
1.00001 - 2.50000
0
0.00
na
0
0
0
Drumskellan
2.50001 - 5.00000
0
0.00
na
0
0
0
Shooting Range
0 - 0.01000
4
327892.15
0.001
328
0.01
Na
Shooting Range
0.01001 - 0.05000
1
203979.08
0.245
49912
2.25
Na
Shooting Range
0.05001 - 0.10000
0
83399.34
0.050
4170
0.19
Na
Shooting Range
0.10001 - 0.50000
1
342661.00
0.462
158161
7.12
Na
Shooting Range
0.50001 - 1.00000
2
91533.00
0.610
55793
2.51
6.58
Shooting Range
1.00001 - 2.50000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
Na
Shooting Range
2.50001 - 5.00000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
Flat Ground
0 - 0.01000
4
299105.93
0.002
636
0.02
0.12
Flat Ground
0.01001 - 0.05000
13
709850.98
0.029
20737
0.62
0.63
Flat Ground
0.05001 - 0.10000
8
640139.32
0.068
43498
1.30
0.91
Flat Ground
0.10001 - 0.50000
28
4467476.66
0.256
1142665
34.28
32.12
Flat Ground
0.50001 - 1.00000
5
1369376.04
0.668
914558
27.44
64.94
Flat Ground
1.00001 - 2.50000
11
1793122.90
1.823
3269325
98.08
51.08
Flat Ground
2.50001 - 5.00000
5
413925.43
3.630
1502479
45.07
53.06
Great Bank
0 - 0.01000
3
135380.40
0.001
135
0.01
na
Great Bank
0.01001 - 0.05000
8
959842.47
0.032
30507
1.37
0.30
Great Bank
0.05001 - 0.10000
7
151646.61
0.079
11985
0.54
1.64
Great Bank
0.10001 - 0.50000
22
5797827.98
0.198
1148747
51.69
0.91
Great Bank
0.50001 - 1.00000
4
530200.95
0.762
403856
18.17
12.89
Great Bank
1.00001 - 2.50000
1
2798.95
1.032
2888
0.13
na
Great Bank
2.50001 - 5.00000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
Na
Bed name
Density Class Range
N
Barneys
0 - 0.01000
Barneys
26
Na
Middle North
0 - 0.01000
8
994178.93
0.001
994
0.07
na
Middle North
0.01001 - 0.05000
2
916577.51
0.027
24814
1.74
28.84
Middle North
0.05001 - 0.10000
1
63280.04
0.069
4343
0.30
na
Middle North
0.10001 - 0.50000
2
29307.28
0.189
5536
0.39
2.77
Middle North
0.50001 - 1.00000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
na
Middle North
1.00001 - 2.50000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
Na
Middle North
2.50001 - 5.00000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
na
Middle South
0 - 0.01000
8
324470.45
0.001
324
0.01
na
Middle South
0.01001 - 0.05000
7
467468.53
0.032
14893
0.45
0.49
Middle South
0.05001 - 0.10000
4
446182.83
0.080
35628
1.07
0.75
Middle South
0.10001 - 0.50000
10
2204316.45
0.222
488537
14.66
22.26
Middle South
0.50001 - 1.00000
4
996040.68
0.870
866115
25.98
5.72
Middle South
1.00001 - 2.50000
5
699298.08
1.633
1142161
34.26
30.57
Middle South
2.50001 - 5.00000
3
156341.31
3.876
606046
18.18
13.97
Moville
0 - 0.01000
7
721459.01
0.003
1925
0.09
0.36
Moville
0.01001 - 0.05000
1
698844.95
0.011
7487
0.34
na
Moville
0.05001 - 0.10000
1
523778.96
0.069
36263
1.63
na
Moville
0.10001 - 0.50000
2
544283.46
0.303
164907
7.42
55.99
Moville
0.50001 - 1.00000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
0.00
Moville
1.00001 - 2.50000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
0.00
Moville
2.50001 - 5.00000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
0.00
Peak
0 - 0.01000
3
168255.54
0.001
168
0.01
0.00
Peak
0.01001 - 0.05000
4
477801.57
0.023
10922
0.49
0.86
Peak
0.05001 - 0.10000
2
462889.90
0.056
25693
1.16
0.68
Peak
0.10001 - 0.50000
5
961598.37
0.204
196206
8.83
11.37
Peak
0.50001 - 1.00000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
0.00
Peak
1.00001 - 2.50000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
0.00
Peak
2.50001 - 5.00000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
0.00
Perch
0 - 0.01000
4
65203.67
0.001
65
0.00
0.00
Perch
0.01001 - 0.05000
2
167961.89
0.011
1869
0.08
0.12
Perch
0.05001 - 0.10000
8
414129.13
0.076
31676
1.43
0.82
Perch
0.10001 - 0.50000
17
1518515.39
0.228
345840
15.56
15.96
Perch
0.50001 - 1.00000
12
500364.35
0.695
347771
15.65
6.39
Perch
1.00001 - 2.50000
4
71173.28
1.439
102397
4.61
2.59
Perch
2.50001 - 5.00000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
0.00
Quigley's Pt
0 - 0.01000
8
22082.85
0.001
22
0.00
0.00
Quigley's Pt
0.01001 - 0.05000
6
107227.10
0.016
1694
0.08
0.07
Quigley's Pt
0.05001 - 0.10000
2
125167.12
0.080
9991
0.45
0.20
Quigley's Pt
0.10001 - 0.50000
8
692221.77
0.231
159652
7.18
6.08
Quigley's Pt
0.50001 - 1.00000
4
367632.93
0.691
254049
11.43
8.14
Quigley's Pt
1.00001 - 2.50000
6
76989.28
1.402
107926
4.86
3.42
Quigley's Pt
2.50001 - 5.00000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
0.00
Redcastle
0 - 0.01000
10
1100728.04
0.002
2008
0.09
0.43
Redcastle
0.01001 - 0.05000
6
198870.45
0.021
4220
0.19
0.29
Redcastle
0.05001 - 0.10000
2
171050.76
0.071
12168
0.55
0.31
27
Redcastle
0.10001 - 0.50000
2
151587.28
0.181
27412
1.23
6.18
Redcastle
0.50001 - 1.00000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
0.00
Redcastle
1.00001 - 2.50000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
0.00
Redcastle
2.50001 - 5.00000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
0.00
Sandy Ridge
0 - 0.01000
18
3003074.73
0.001
2880
0.13
0.80
Sandy Ridge
0.01001 - 0.05000
6
733307.18
0.014
10448
0.47
0.40
Sandy Ridge
0.05001 - 0.10000
1
344006.25
0.073
25019
1.13
na
Sandy Ridge
0.10001 - 0.50000
3
657838.67
0.255
167810
7.55
13.38
Sandy Ridge
0.50001 - 1.00000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
0.00
Sandy Ridge
1.00001 - 2.50000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
0.00
Sandy Ridge
2.50001 - 5.00000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
0.00
Southside North
0 - 0.01000
2
6478.73
0.001
6
0.00
0.00
Southside North
0.01001 - 0.05000
4
155751.23
0.027
4216
0.13
0.23
Southside North
0.05001 - 0.10000
5
279336.59
0.072
20219
0.61
0.49
Southside North
0.10001 - 0.50000
7
899864.51
0.305
274104
8.22
10.89
Southside North
0.50001 - 1.00000
4
511399.32
0.727
371767
11.15
4.67
Southside North
1.00001 - 2.50000
5
475341.72
1.457
692752
20.78
23.19
Southside North
2.50001 - 5.00000
1
18792.94
3.058
57475
1.72
na
Southside South
0 - 0.01000
3
20078.78
0.001
20
0.00
0.00
Southside South
0.01001 - 0.05000
9
317521.82
0.029
9137
0.27
0.21
Southside South
0.05001 - 0.10000
5
229021.24
0.069
15801
0.47
0.49
Southside South
0.10001 - 0.50000
11
1510788.49
0.279
421308
12.64
16.55
Southside South
0.50001 - 1.00000
5
730232.19
0.678
495441
14.86
6.65
Southside South
1.00001 - 2.50000
8
549842.04
1.664
914865
27.45
15.26
Southside South
2.50001 - 5.00000
1
52699.39
4.919
259219
7.78
na
Black Ghee
0 - 0.01000
6
651761.93
0.001
652
0.03
0.00
Black Ghee
0.01001 - 0.05000
2
630835.26
0.023
14721
0.66
5.56
Black Ghee
0.05001 - 0.10000
1
151646.61
0.062
9423
0.42
na
Black Ghee
0.10001 - 0.50000
4
912591.66
0.189
172151
7.75
7.53
Black Ghee
0.50001 - 1.00000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
0.00
Black Ghee
1.00001 - 2.50000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
0.00
Black Ghee
2.50001 - 5.00000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
0.00
McGhee Bank
0 - 0.01000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
0.00
McGhee Bank
0.01001 - 0.05000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
0.00
McGhee Bank
0.05001 - 0.10000
1
66878.69
0.057
3807
0.17
na
McGhee Bank
0.10001 - 0.50000
5
800000.00
0.246
196441
8.84
7.91
McGhee Bank
0.50001 - 1.00000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
0.00
McGhee Bank
1.00001 - 2.50000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
0.00
McGhee Bank
2.50001 - 5.00000
0
0.00
na
0
0.00
0.00
28