CO2-Coalitions-not-so-Golden-Science-EB

Link: https://edberry.com/co2coalition/

Please see the link above for the source text.

Ed Berry

June 13, 2025 - July 24, 2025

My debate with the CO2 Coalition report is over

The CO2 Coalition's special report is entitled,

"Human Contribution to Atmospheric CO2: How Human Emissions are Restoring Vital Atmospheric CO2. "

I wrote a draft rebuttal and opened it for debate on edberry.com. There were 489 comments and 3667 views. See the article, ‘ CO2 Coalition’s not so Golden Science’ and the discussion here.

Ferdinand Engelbeen, first author of the document made extensive comments arguing for his opinion. I compliment him for his effort even though I seriouly disagree with his and the CO2 Coalition's physics.

I thank all the people who took time to comment on my side. Now, I will update my rebuttal and submit it for publication.

I learned that the peudoscience behind this CO2 Coalition report is far worse than I had ever imagined. No serious physicist or engineer can support the delusional science arguments in this CO2 Coalition report.

The title itself reveals the report is intended to support the biased, unscientific views of Patrick Moore, Chief Alpha of the CO2 Coalition.

This report proves CO2 Coalition scientists should not defend the climate lawsuit against Trump

because they agree with the plaintiffs and they can't argue their way out of a scientific paper bag.

Somebody better wake up Trump to get a better defense, or this lawsuit will be a major disaster for Trump, America, and the world.

Click here to read and comment