EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON FLEXURAL BEHAVIOUR OF LIGHT WEIGHT SELF-COMPACTING CONCRETE WITH WALNUT SHELL

Page 1

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON FLEXURAL BEHAVIOUR OF LIGHT WEIGHT SELF-COMPACTING CONCRETE WITH WALNUT SHELL AND GGBFS AS

MINERAL ADMIXTURE

2

1

Abstract - In recent decades, the application of selfcompacting concrete (SCC) has emerging in construction structures because of its good abilities to improve durability anddecreasebleedingwithgoodbondingwithrebar.Besides, large amount of aggregates is required for the production of SCC. On the other hand, replacing natural aggregate in SCC with waste materials can led to discover ecological building materials. Walnut shell (WS) is one of the natural and agriculture waste materials which can be used as a substitutionofaggregateinSCC.Inthisresearch,WSwasused as a replacement of coarse aggregate and ground granular blast furnace slag (GGBFS) as mineral admixture for constructingSCCbyemployingvolumefractionsofWSis35%. The optimum percentage of GGBFS content is considered for the research. Fresh and hardened properties of SCC and lightweight self- compacting concrete (LWSCC) were investigated for the mix and control one. The results showed that all tested properties have satisfactory results of conventional SCC. However; the LWSCC can get at fraction volumeofWSequalandormorethan35%.Where,slumpflow diameter (SFD), compressive strengths and split tensile strength for flyash were 550 mm, 28 MPa and 2.4 MPa respectively achieved at 35% ratio of WS.

Key Words: Self-compactingconcrete,Walnutshell,Coarse aggregate,Mineraladmixture,Lightweightself-compacting concrete.

1.INTRODUCTION

Theintroductionofnewmaterials,whichactasstructure massreductionandworkablematerialssuchaslightweight concrete (LWC) and self-compacting concrete (SCC) materials are one of the most recent technology in the modern construction industries. Lightweight selfcompactingconcrete(LWSCC)ispredictedtoproducehigh workabilitywhilenotsegregationandhighdurabilitywith reduced weight of SCC Light- weight aggregate (LWA) is generally used in the LWC construction and can be manufacturedbynaturallysourcedorartificiallyconstructed fromprocessingby-productsofsomeindustrialprocesses. Lightweight concrete has a low viscosity and large rate of flow which is very important for concrete pumping, particularly in multi-storey buildings. The success to

***

production of high quality LWSCC lies within the use and qualityofaggregates.

Walnutshell(WS)isoneofthenaturalandagriculturewaste materialswhichcanbeusedasasubstitutionofaggregatein SCC. The utilization of walnut shell aggregate with other quality additional cementing materials like GGBFS can providehighlyworkableanddurableLWSCC.Useofthese aggregates provides property to the sustainable development by protective energy increasing structural propertiesandincreasingtheservicelifetimeofstructural lightweightconcrete(LWC). Compactionisnormallydone with the help of vibrator during concreting and it raises concreting cost. In earnest quest for innovation in constructionindustryself-compactingconcrete(SCC)inlate 1980 s and is gradually gaining popularity. SCC have a propertytoflowundergravityandmorecompactlyfillthe complex space of formwork as well as the area congested with reinforcement. LWSCC is capable of filling up the formworkandencapsulatereinforcementbyitsself-weight withouttheneedforextracompactionorexternalvibration. It has better segregation resistance, high flowability and passingabilityatfreshstateaswellasbettermechanicaland durabilitypropertiesinthehardenedstate.

1.2 Ground Granular Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS)

GGBSismainlyusedasapartialsubstituentforcementin concrete. When added as an admixture to concrete, its performancesasastabilizingagentandenhancethequality of concrete. In the production of ready-mixed concrete, a portion of the Portland cement component is replaced by GGBS, generally about 60-70%. It is resistant to sulfate attacks,chloride-relatedcorrosionandalkali-silicareaction. Itisoneofthegreenestconstructionmaterialsthatdoesnot manufacturesanywasteanditswaterdemandlowerby35%comparedtoOPC.

Table

-1: ChemicalCompositionofGGBFS[4]

Sl.No. Chemicalcomposition

PercentageContent

1 Silica(SiO2) 36.41

2 IronOxide(Fe2O3) 0.69

Volume: 09 Issue: 08 | Aug 2022 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 © 2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page1841

P.G. Student, Structural Engineering, Universal Engineering college, Thrissur, Kerala Associate Professor, Civil Department, Universal Engineering college, Thrissur,Kerala

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 09 Issue: 08 | Aug 2022 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

3 Alumina(Al2O3) 10.39 4 CalciumOxide(CaO) 34.12 5 MagnesiumOxide(MgO) 8 6 TotalSulphur(SO3)7 PottassiumOxide(K2O) 0.97

Table -2: PhysicalPropertyofGGBFS[4]

Sl.No. PhysicalProperty TestResults 1 Colour Grey 2 SpecificGravity 2.3

2.MATERIALS USED

2.1 Cement

Use of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) of Grade 53 accordingtoISspecificationsismadeinthisinvestigation. Table3providescement'scharacteristics.

Table-3: PropertiesofOPC53GradeCement

Properties Test Results TechnicalReference

SpecificGravity 3.12 IS4031(PART11):1988 Consistency(%) 30 IS4031(PART4):1988 Finenessof Cement(%) 4.7 IS4031(PART2):1996

InitialSetting Time(minutes) 78 IS4031(PART5):1988

2.2 Fine Aggregate

For construction, manufactured sand (M-Sand) is an alternative for river sand. M-sand is a product made from hardgranitestonethat werecrushed. M-Sand isless than 4.75mminsize.Additionally,itisadust-freematerialthat pollutes very little. Table 4 lists the fine aggregate's characteristics.

Table-4:PropertiesofFineAggregate[25]

Properties Test Results

SpecificGravity 2.52

FinenessModulus 3.84

FreeSurfaceMoisture Nil

2.3 Coarse Aggregate

Aggregateswithaparticlesizemorethan4.75 mm,but typicallybetween10and40mminsizeisconsideredascoarse aggregate.Concretebenefitsfromcoarseaggregate'sstrength, toughness,andhardnessqualitiesaswellasitsresistanceto abrasion. The experimental study's coarse aggregate was 12.5mminsizeandconformedtoIS383:1970.Table5lists thecharacteristicsofcoarseaggregate.

Table-5: PropertiesofCoarseAggregate

Properties Test Results Technical Reference

SpecificGravity 2.69 IS2386(PART3):Clause2.4.2

FreeSurface Moisture Nil IS383(PART3):1970

Fineness Modulus 4.25 IS383(PART 3): 1970 table2

2.4 Walnut Shell

Walnutshellhasuniqueproperties,itisverydenseand takesyearsandyearstodecomposeorbreakdown.Itcanbe crushedandcouldbegroundintoseveralpiecesfromextra finetoextracourse.Duetotheexcessivehardnessofwalnut shell,walnutshellisusedasanabrasivethatisappliedto surfacepreparationoncementitioussurfacesincludingcastin-place concrete floors and walls, masonry walls, and shotcretesurfaces.Walnutshellisadequatelyhardnatural materialwhichcanbeusedascoarseaggregatepartiallyfor making lightweight concrete. However, its particle size, shapeandgradationwillaffectwork-abilityandstrengthof concrete.Moisturecontentandwaterabsorptionproperties willinfluenceshrinkageperformance.

Fig.1WalnutShellandCrushed12.5mmWalnutShell

Table-6: PropertiesofWalnutShell[13]

SpecificGravity 0.96

WaterAbsorption 10%

Thickness 0.86–1.35

SizeOfAggregate 12.5mm

Page1842
© 2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal |

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 09 Issue: 08 | Aug 2022 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

2.5 Water

Waterisrequiredtowetthesurfaceofaggregatetodevelop adhesive quality as the cement paste binds quickly and satisfactorilytothewetsurfaceoftheaggregatesthandry surface. It is commonly accepted view that any portable water is suitable to be used in concrete making. It should haveinorganicsolidlessthan1000ppmandshouldbefree frominjuriousquantitiesofalkalies,acids,oils,salts,sugars, organicmaterials,vegetablegrowthorothersubstancethat canbedeleterioustobricks,stones,concreteorsteel.

2.6 Admixture

“Amaterialotherthanwater,aggregates,hydrauliccement, andfiberreinforcement,usedasaningredientofconcreteor mortar, and added to the batch right away before or during itsmixing”isthedefinitionforadmixture. Chemical admixtures are used to upgrade the quality of concrete during mixing, transporting, placement and curing. MASTERRHEOBUILD 1126ND has a different chemical structurefromthetraditionalsuperplasticisers.Itconsists of a naphthalene formaldehyde polymer with long side chains. With this process, flowable concrete with reduced watercontentisobtained.

Table-7: PerformanceData

Aspect DarkBrownLiquid RelativeDensity 1.24±0.02at25 c pH ≥6

ChlorideIronContent ˂0.2%

3. SPECIMEN DETAILS

Cubesofsize150mmx150mmx150mmwasusedforthe study. A total of 6 cubes and 3-cylinder specimen were casted.Thespecimenwastestedbytheoptimumcontentof GGBFS45%withoptimumcontentofwalnutshell35%in self-compacting concrete. And 6 cubes and 3-cylinder specimen were casted of conventional SCC. The mix were designedaccordingtoIS456:2000andthedetails.

3.1 Preparation of Specimen

Therequiredquantitiesofcement,fineaggregate,coarse aggregate,superplasticisers,mineraladmixtureandwater weretakenforcontrolspecimens,inadditiontothis,walnut shell were mixed with the ingredients. Concrete was prepared by machine mixing. Initially cement and fine aggregateweremixedindrystateuntilitisofevencolour throughoutandfreefromstreaksfollowedbytheadditionof walnutshellandthenmeasuredquantityofcoarseaggregate wasspreadout.Thewholemasswasmixedbymachineinan angleof45%.Three quarter ofthetotal quantityofwater wasaddedwhilethematerialswereturnedintowardsthe centrewithspades.Theremainingwaterwasaddedslowly when the whole mixture was turning over and over again until a uniform colour and consistency was obtained throughout.

Themouldwasmadereadiedbyapplyingoilinallcontact surfaces.Concretewasspreadonthemouldanduniformly spreadthemixonthemould.Theotherspecimenwascast by adding walnut shell of 35% to the concrete. Proper surfacefinishingwasprovided.Thespecimenwasremoved fromthemouldafter24hoursandkeptforcuring.After28 daysofcuring,specimenswerereadyfortesting.

4.TEST METHODS

4.1 Tests on Fresh SCC

Many different test methods have been introduced in attempts to characterise the properties of SCC. Similarly, thereisnosinglemethodhasbeenfoundwhichcharacterises alltherelevantworkabilityaspectssoeachmixdesignshould be tested by more than one test method for the different workabilityparameters.FortheinitialmixdesignofSCCall threeworkabilityparametersneedtobe evaluateto make surethatallaspectsarefulfilled.

Twotestmethodsaregenerallysufficienttomonitorthe qualitycontrolinsiteforproductionquality.Typicalthetest conductedareSlump-flowandV-funnelorSlump-flowandJring. Table-

© 2022,
|
|
Certified Journal | Page1843
IRJET
Impact Factor value: 7.529
ISO 9001:2008
ListofTestMethodsforWorkabilityPropertiesof SCC
Sl. No. Method Property 1 Slump-flowbyAbram’scone Fillingability 2 T50cmslumpflow Fillingability 3 J-ring Passingability 4 V-funnel Fillingability 5 V-funnelatT5minutes Segregationresistance 6 L-box Passingability
8:
[28]

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 09 Issue: 08 | Aug 2022 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

5 .TEST METHODS ON HARDENED CONCRETE

Thepropertiesofhardenedconcrete,suchascompressive strength and split tensile strength of concrete mixes were determinedbycasting150x150x150mmcubespecimens, 150x300mmcylinderspecimensasperISspecifications.

5.1 Compressive Strength Test

4.2 Workability Criteria for the Fresh SCC

The requirements are to be satisfied at the time of placingwhichmeansitinfreshstate. Likely changesin workability during transport of mix should be taken into account in production. EFNARC specifications provides typical acceptancecriteriaforSelf-compactingconcretewith amaximumaggregatesizeupto20mmareshowninTable9.

Table-9: AcceptanceCriteriaforSelf-CompactingConcrete [28]

Test Method Unit Typical Range of Value Minimum Maximum Slump-flowbyAbram’s cone mm 650.0 800

T50cmslumpflow sec 20.0 5 J-ring mm 6.0 10 V-funnel sec 0.0 12 V-funnelatT5minutes sec 0.8 ±3 L-box h2/h1 0.0 1 U-box h2-h1 (mm) 90.0 30 Fill-box % 0.0 100 GTMscreenstabilitytest Sec 0.0 15 Orimet Sec - 5

These typical requirements shown against each test method are based on modern knowledge and practice. Specialcareshouldbetakentoensurenosegregationforthe mix.

Table-10 TestResultsonFreshConcrete

Trial Mix Slump (mm) T50 cm (Sec) L - box

SCC1 480 37.00 0.4 SCC2 580 18.00 0.8 SCC3 600 6.18 0.9

Thecompressivestrengthofconcreterepresentsoneof themostimportantfeaturesusedinthedesignrulesofthe concrete structures, and many of other mechanical characteristics and physical properties of concrete. The resultsaretabulatedforconventionalSCC inTable11.

Figure2CompressiveStrengthTestofSCCMixwith GGBFS

Table-11: TestResultsonConventionalSCCHardened Concrete

Sample Number Compressive Strength of Cube (N/mm2) Split Tensile Strength (N/mm2) 1 37.77 3.324 2 37.11 3.254 3 36.88 3.324 Average 37.25 3.333

Table-11: TestResultsonCompressiveStrengthofLWSCC CubeswithGGBFS

No. of Days Load (kN) Compressive Strength (N/mm2) Average Compressive Strength (N/mm2) 7 415 18.44 18.29 450 20.00 370 16.44 28 680 30.22 29.09 650 28.88 634 28.17

©
| Page1844
2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal
7 U-box Passingability 8 Fill-box Passingability 9 GTMscreenstabilitytest Segregationresistance 10 Orimet Fillingability

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 09 Issue: 08 | Aug 2022 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

5.2 Split Tensile Strength Test

Theconcreteisweakintensionduetoitsbrittlenature andisnotexpectedtoresistthedirecttension.Theconcrete developscrackswhenitissubjectedtotensileforces.Thus,it isnecessarytodeterminethetensilestrengthofconcreteto determine the load at which the concrete members may producecrack.Tensilestrengthofconcreteismuchlowerto its compressivestrength. Itisapproximatethatthe tensile strength of concrete equals roughly about 10 % of compressivestrength.

Table-11: TestResultsonSplitTensileStrengthofLWSCC CubeswithGGBFS

No. of Days Load(kN)

Split Tensile Strength (N/mm2)

Figure3

5. CONCLUSIONS

The main aim was to study the properties of LWC using walnutshellascoarseaggregatewiththeconventionalselfcompacting concrete. From the studies we come to the followingconclusions:

ď‚·

The compressive strength test and split tensile strengthobtainedfromtheexperimentaltestwere notsatisfied.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

IwishtothanktheManagement,PrincipalandHeadofCivil EngineeringDepartmentofUniversalEngineeringCollege, Thrissur, affiliated by Kerala Technological University for theirsupport.Thispaperisbasedontheworkcarriedoutby me (Anjana Pradeep), as part of my PG course, under the guidance of Mrs. Anima P. (Associate professor, Civil Department, Universal Engineering College, Thrissur, Kerala). I express my gratitude towards her for valuable guidance.

REFERENCES

1. AnandDevB.G.andJayasreeS.(2017),“Effectof LightweightAggregateontheFlexuralBehaviourof SelfCompactingConcrete”, International Journal of ScientificandEngineeringResearch,Vol.7,Issue10, pp: 16 – 22

2. Arul sivanantham P. and Gokul R. (2018), “A ReviewonSelfCompactingConcrete”, International Journal of Chem Research,Vol.10,Issue11,pp: 62 –68

3. DominicStefanLawYimWan,FarhadAslaniand Guowei Ma (2018), “Lightweight Self-Compacting Concrete Incorporating Perlite, Scoria, and PolystyreneAggregates”, Journal of material in civil engineering, Vol. 8, Issue 30, pp: 1 –13

4. E. Guneyisi et. al, (2013), “Performance of Self Compacting Concrete (SCC) with High Volume Supplementary Cementitious Material (SCMs)”, Science Direct,pp:198–217

5. Idowu H. Adebakin, K. Gunasekaran and R. Annadurai (2018), “Mix Design and Rheological Properties of Self-Compacting Coconut Shell Aggregate Concrete”, Journal of Engineering and Applied Science,pp:465–1475

6. JingjunLi,EnjiaZhao,JiangangNiuandChaojun Wan,(2020),“Studyonmixturedesignmethodand mechanicalpropertiesofsteelfiberreinforcedselfcompactinglightweightaggregateconcrete”, Science Direct,pp:1–15

ď‚·

FromthestudyitshowsthatLWCrequireddensity below2000kg/mÂłandwiththerequiredstrength were 38 MPa and we obtained density as per the studyandbutstrengthobtainedwas28MPa.

7. K. J. H. Zhou and Ho and Su (2011), “Flexural Strength and Deformability Design of Reinforced Concrete Beams”, ScienceDirect,Vol.14,pp:1399–1407

ď‚·

Fromtheobtainedresults35%givestheeffective replacementofcoarseaggregatewithwalnutshell givessimilarstrengthofself-compactingconcrete.

8. K.S. Elango, D. Vivek, S. Anandaraj, R. Saravanakumar, J. Sanfeer and S. Saravanaganesh (2021), “Experimental study on self-compacting concrete using light weight aggregate”, Science Direct,Vol.14,pp:1–6

©
Journal | Page1845
2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified
Average Split Tensile Strength (N/mm2) 28 180 2.544 2.470 172 2.433 172 2.433
SplitTensileStrengthTestingofLWSCCMix withGGBFS

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 09 Issue: 08 | Aug 2022 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

9. Mahmoud Khashaa Mohammed, Abdulkader IsmailAl-HadithiandMarwaH.Mohammed(2019), “Productionandoptimizationofeco-efficientselfcompactingconcreteSCCwithlimestoneandPET”, Science Direct,Vol.197,pp:734-746

10. Mohammed Sonebi and AmmarYahia (2020), “Mix Design Procedure, Tests and Standards”, Science Direct,pp:1-30

11. MojdehMehrinejadKhotbehsara,EhsanMohseni, TogayOzbakkalogluandMalekMohammadRanjbar (2017), “Durability Characteristics of SelfCompacting Concrete Incorporating Pumice and Metakaolin”, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering,Vol. 11, Issue 29,pp:1-9

12. Mouhcine Ben Aicha (2020), “The Superplasticizer Effect on The Rheological and MechanicalPropertiesofSelfCompactingConcrete”, Science Direct,pp:315–331

13. Nahla Hilal, Taghreed Kh Mohammed Ali and Bassam A. Tayeh (2021), “Fresh and Hardened PropertiesofLightweightSelf-CompactingConcrete Containing Walnut Shells as Coarse Aggregate”, Science Direct,Vol.33,pp:364–372

14. Nahla Hilal, Taghreed Kh Mohammed Ali and Bassam A. Tayeh (2020), “Properties of environmental concrete that contains crushed walnutshellaspartialreplacementforaggregates”, Arabian Journal of Geosciences,pp:1–9

15. Paratibha Aggarwal (2008), “Self-Compacting Concrete – Procedure for Mix Design”, Leonardo Electronic Journal of Practices and Technologies”, Vol.12,pp:15–24

16. ParatibhaAggarwal,KiranDeviandBabitaSaini (2019), “Admixtures Used inSelf-Compacting Concrete:AReview”, Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering”,Vol. 8,Issue 30,pp:15–42

17. Peter A. Classie (2016), “Admixtures for Concrete” Science Direct,pp251–258

18. R.GopiandV.Revathi(2020),“Flexuralbehavior of self-compacting self-curing concrete with lightweightaggregates”, ScienceDirect”,Vol.12,pp: 1–7

19. Timothy Zhi Hong Ting, Muhammad Ekhlasur Rahman and Hieng Ho Lau (2020), “Sustainable lightweightself-compactingconcreteusingoilpalm shellandflyash”, Science Direct,Vol.12,pp:1–13

20. Weimin Cheng, Guoming Liu and Lianjun Chen (2017), “Pet Fiber Reinforced Wet-Mix Shotcrete withWalnutShellasReplacedAggregate”, Applied Science,Vol.7,Issue345pp:1–19

21. IS10262:2009[mixdesign]22.IS456-2000

22. IS4031-1988[Standardconsistencyofcement]

23. IS2720(PartIII)[Specificgravityofcement]

24. IS12269-1987 [Finenessofcement]

25. IS2386(Part-III)-1963[Fineaggregates]

26. IS383:1970[sieveanalysis]

27. IS2386(Part-III)-1970[coarseaggregate]

28. EFNARC-Specifications and Guidelines for SelfCompactingConcrete

2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal |

©
Page1846

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook