International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)
e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 09 Issue: 07 | July 2022
p-ISSN: 2395-0072
www.irjet.net
An Empirical Investigation into the Origins and Causes of Variation Orders in Construction Projects Ansuman Pati Architect, Student (MBA-CPM), School of Construction, RICS School of Built Environment ---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract - Construction projects are intricate and one-of-
Another disadvantage of the variation clause is that it encourages clients to alter their minds and start construction projects before adequately considering their project requirements. (Finsen 1999:109).
a-kind procedures. Because of the dynamic nature of the construction sector, it is nearly impossible to foresee anything ahead of time. The initial strategy for the project and the terms of the contract can undergo major shifts, which can result in variations. Cost and time overruns are the result of those differences. The majority of variations are observed to be caused by the human component. This study describes the variations produced by construction project stakeholders. It also emphasizes concerns in industry culture and their impact on the number of variations. Although it is an excellent practice to adequately plan all projects, changes in circumstances need that flexibility to be maintained. Measures should ideally be able to perform under both expected and unexpected conditions, striking a balance between precision and flexibility. The primary goal of this study was to investigate the reasons for variation and to advocate for the need for flexibility in contracts. Key Words: Costs, Time.
Contractors, on the other hand, are primarily concerned with construction costs and their decrease. The reality that clients or their agents may be causes of greater building expenses is rarely acknowledged. Clients and consultants frequently overlook the fact that issuing a large number of variation orders leads to increased construction costs. (Ndihokubwayo, Ruben & Haupt, Theo. (2008)). Provisions for changes in contracts allow contracting parties to initiate variation orders within the scope of the work without altering the original contract. (Ndihokubwayo and Haupt 2008). Once a contract has been signed, its terms cannot be amended unless the contract expressly allows for it, and then only those changes that are plainly within the contract's terms are permissible (Willis & Willis, 1980). Variations and disagreements are fairly typical in building projects, at work, and even in our daily lives (Arain and Low 2006). Variations are a typical occurrence in the construction business, and they can cause time and cost overruns as well as quality variations in both basic and complex projects. Furthermore, change's indirect consequences are important. Loss of productivity and disruption of workflows and financial flows, as Bower (2000) suggests, are examples of indirect consequences that can lead to lower morale, claims, and disputes between parties. (Chantawarangul, K., Suanpaga, W., Yazdani, S., Vimonsatit, V., and Singh, A. (Eds.))
Construction, Variations, Stakeholders,
1. INTRODUCTION A construction contract is a contract that can be renegotiated between the two parties involved in the project. The parties to a contract may freely begin variation orders within the scope of the works if the contract contains contractual clauses pertaining to modifications. However, this does not relieve the parties of any obligation to amend the original contract in any way. Additions, deletions, adjustments, and substitutions are all examples of what can be included in variation orders in relation to the quality, quantity, and schedule of the works. If there were no contractual terms, the construction contractor would have to agree to build exactly the structure that was depicted on the plans and reflected in the invoices for the total amount that was agreed upon for the contract, without making any modifications.
Ssegawa et al.(2002) goes on to say that the existence of contract variation clauses proves that no project can be finished without adjustments. As a result, variation is a persistent issue in the building business. Although it is ideal if all projects are completely planned, changes in circumstances (such as the client's operational environment) need maintaining flexibility. Failure to respond to environmental influences may have an impact on the project's output's appropriateness. (Hughes 1989). Project measures including plans, processes, organizations, contracts, and information systems should ideally be able to perform in both expected and unexpected circumstances. (Gilbreath 1986).
Because it is difficult for clients to envisage the ultimate product they purchase, some variation should be expected (Love 2002:19). The drawback of the variation clause, on the other hand, is that architects are less likely to put their intentions in writing before signing the contract since they know the variation clause will allow them to finalize their plans during the contract's term (Wainwright & Wood 1983:11).
© 2022, IRJET
|
Impact Factor value: 7.529
|
ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal
|
Page 1042