International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) Volume: 09 Issue: 07 | July 2022
www.irjet.net
e-ISSN: 2395-0056 p-ISSN: 2395-0072
COST COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STEEL CONCRETE COMPOSITE AND RCC STRUCTURE Thomas Paul1, Ambadi Raveendran2, John Febin Mathews3, Keerthi P4, Nizam Sainudheen5 1Assistant
Professor, Dept of Civil Engineering, M A College of Engineering, Kerala, India Students, Dept of Civil Engineering, M A College of Engineering, Kerala, India ---------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------1.2 ADVANTAGE OF COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION Abstract - The project entails the analysis, planning, and 2,3,4,5UG
design of a steel-concrete composite building. The planned building is a G+4 structure with floors that are each 3.75 metres high. The building's total plan is 39.6 m by 12.3 m. The structural planning, load calculations, analysis by 2D modelling using STAAD-Pro V8i, design of composite floors and columns, design of steel beams, design of RCC beam, design of RCC column, and design of RCC slab are all included in the analysis and design process. According to the Indian Standard Code of Practice, analysis has been performed for a variety of load combinations. In this project, a comparable RCC structure is also created so that the costs of both the steel composite and the RCC structure has been compared. V8i
Concrete slabs are supported by steel beams in conventional composite construction by keeping them on top of the latter. These two parts do not behave as monolithic structures when under load, and if they are not connected, there is a potential that slide will happen at the interface. The possibility of slip happening between the beam and slab can be minimized with the use of a purposeful and suitable connection created between them. The steel beam and slab in this situation function as a "composite beam," acting similarly to a monolithic Tee beam. Due to the fact that steel is more prone to buckling in compression and concrete is stronger in compression than tension, we can fully take advantage of each material's benefits by combining the two. The use of steelconcrete composite construction has various benefits.
1. INTRODUCTION
2. METHODOLOGY
1.1 OBJECTIVE
Step 1: The plan is drawn using AutoCad.
The use of Steel in construction industry is very low in India compared to many developing countries. Experiences of other countries indicate that this is not due to the lack of economy of Steel as a construction material. There is a great potential for increasing the volume of Steel in construction, especially in the current development needs in India. Not exploring Steel as an alternative construction material and not using it where it is economical is a heavy loss for the country. Also, it is evident that now-a-days, the composite sections using Steel encased with Concrete are economic, cost and time effective solution in major civil structures such as bridges and high-rise buildings.
Step 2: The proposed plan is then modelled and analysed in STAAD.Pro.V8i.
Key Words: steel concrete composite, cost, STAAD Pro
Step 3: Both R.C.C and Steel Concrete Composite is then designed manually. Step 4: Cost is then estimated for both R.C.C and Steel Concrete Composite. Step 5: Result was compared and its economic feasibility was found out.
3. ANALYSIS The explained 3 D model is analyzed by the software STAAD Pro. Different parameters such as deflection, shear force, and bending moment are studied for the models.
In due consideration of the above fact, this project has been envisaged which consists of analysis and design of a high-rise building using Steel-Concrete composites. The project also involves analysis and design of an equivalent R.C.C structure so that a cost comparison can be made between a Steel-Concrete composite structure and an equivalent R.C.C. structure.
© 2022, IRJET
|
Impact Factor value: 7.529
|
ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal
|
Page 1006