DESIGNING FRAMED STRUCTURE IN ETABS AND STAAD PRO

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e ISSN: 2395 0056

Volume: 09 Issue: 06 | Jun 2022 www.irjet.net p ISSN: 2395 0072

DESIGNING FRAMED STRUCTURE IN ETABS AND STAAD PRO

Aamir1, Ravinder2, Sheela Malik3, Rashid Ahmad4

1 (M.tech Scholar) 2nd year, Department of Civil Engineering, Ganga Institute of Technology and Management, Jhajjar Haryana (India)

2Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Ganga Institute of Technology and Management, Jhajjar Haryana (India)

3Assitant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Ganga Institute of Technology and Management, Jhajjar Haryana (India) 4Civil Engineer ***

Abstract - As the use of steel building increases daily, it is crucial to create aesthetically pleasing structures that are also cost effective. Since no software is perfect, designers must rely on a variety of tools to create unique architectures, specific components, or connections. In this study, we'll create a PEB structure and assess its viability and simplicity using two distinct pieces of software, then compare the outcome.

Key Words: Software,designing,structure,BIM,steel,construction.

1. INTRODUCTION

Steelconstructionisgrowingdaybydayandit’simportanttodesignthestructureelegantlyandeconomically.Softwareisused todesignthestructureandhandcalculationiscarriedouttochecktheaccuracyofthedesign.Inmanycountries,it’simportant to check the integrity of design using hand calculation. There is various software in the market with each having certain capabilitiestodesigncertainstructuresmoreefficiently.Thereisvarioustypeofstructureandsomegeneralstructuresuchas concrete,steel,aluminum,andwoodstructureusedmoreoftenandcountrieshavedifferentcodesandregulationtodesign these structures. No software is complete and thus designers have to depend upon various software to design different structuresorcertainpartsorconnections.Inthisstudy,wegoingtodesignaPEBstructureandcheckthefeasibilityandease withwhichwedesignthesamestructureintwodifferentsoftwareandcomparetheresult.Wewillusethesameloadsand memberssizetodesignthestructure.Wewillcheckthequalityofthefinalresultsofthetwosoftware.

1.1 OBJECTIVE AND RESEARCH PROPOSAL Theobjectiveofthisresearchistocheckthedesigncapabilityoftwosoftware bycomparingtheresult.Thestructuredesignisasteelconnectionandthemembersusedindesigningisapproximatelythe same.

2. MATERIAL AND METHODS Beforedesigningthestructureweassumedvariousdataregardingthestructure,itsuse,its locationandtheforcesitcancountupon.WeassumedLSMmethodologyusingIndianstandardcodestodesignthemembers, thestructurefallsinearthquakezoneIVandthestructureisframedPEBstructureandthestructureispartiallyopened.

2.1 LIMIT STATE METHOD - Thelikelihoodofastructurefailingislowestwhenitisthoughtfullyplannedanddeveloped. Inordertoaccountforvariationsinmaterialpropertiesandtheloadtobesupported,thestructureisdesignedusing characteristicvaluesofitsmaterialstrengthsandappliedloads.Applyingpartialsafetyfactorsresultsindesignvalue.

ThedesignactionQdisexpressedas And,thedesignstrengthSdisobtainedas =

Mohd

SPECIFICATION

02

03

04

2.3 MATERIAL REQUIRED Table 2 MaterialListbyframeSectionProperty TABLE: Frame Section Property Definitions Steel I/Wide Flange Name File Name Section in File Total Depth Top Flange Width Top Flange Thickness Web Thickness Bottom Flange Width Bottom Flange Thickness mm mm mm mm mm mm col_400 400 300 16 8 300 16 col_750_depth 750 350 16 8 350 16 ISLB600 Indian ISLB600 600 210 15.5 10.5 210 15.5 ISWB550 Indian ISWB550 550 250 17.6 10.5 250 17.6 mem_1_high_depth_800 800 350 16 8 350 16 mem_1_low_depth_700 700 300 16 8 300 16 mem_2_high_depth 900 900 300 30 12 300 20 SteelBm 500 166.7 12.5 6.3 166.7 12.5 SteelCol 500 500 25 12.5 500 25

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e ISSN: 2395 0056 Volume: 09 Issue: 06 | Jun 2022 www.irjet.net p ISSN: 2395 0072

Fig Designprocessinthesoftware 2.2

Table 1 Structurespecification 01 ThespanofthePEB 40m

SpacingofthePEBframe 7.6m

Heightofcolumn 5m

Lengthofbuilding 91m 05 RiseofthePEB 7m 06 Slopeoftheroof(ϴ) 10degree 07 Lengthalongtheslopingroof 20.m 08 Lengthofeachpanel(c/cspacingofpurlin) 7.6m 09 SpacingofgablefromPEBframe 7.4m

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e ISSN: 2395 0056

Table

Section Object Type No of Pieces Length Weight m kN

member_700mm

Beam 34 154.098 166.0928 mem_1_prismatic_800mm_to_700mm Beam 22 147.3982 173.1145 member_2_prismat_700mm_to_900mm Beam 22 147.3981 227.7299

Column400mm Column 21 138.6 133.8249

Columnmiddle Column 26 130 124.8399 member_3_900_to_700 Beam 22 73.6992 113.8653 ISMC Beam 104 791.54 273.43

ROD50 Beam 36 366.54 16.72 ROD50 Brace 12 109.83 5.08

2.4 LOADS CALCULATION

–

Dead load DeadloadiscalculatedusingIndiancode875part1

Member’sDeadload

Therearetwoframesinthesection

1) Gabbleendframe

2) mainframeorcenterspanframe  DeadLoad themembersinthemainframeconsistof membersofvarioussizesfromrodsectiontonon prismaticmembersconsisting = 3.1 KN/m  DeadLoadintheEndframe GabbleEnds = 1.4 KN/m  Loadsfromdifferentpartssuchassheets,purlin,HVACfitting, Solarpaneletc. = 40.0 Kg/m²

TheseloadsareeithercalculatedusingIS875part1thenassigntothemembersorcodescanbeselectedwhendesigning thestructureandweightcanbeassignedusingself weightoption.

Live load LiveloadscanbecalculatedusingIndiancode875part2

LiveLoadsonmembers areaonwhichliveloadactsis2600sqm2

Liveload/unitarea = 75.00 Kg/m²

DeadLoadcenterspan = 5.5 KN/m

DeadLoadGableEndSpan = 3 KN/m

Wind load ForcalculatingthewindloadweusedIS875part3

Vb =33m/s Isgivenby ( =0.9 Clause7.2.1

=0.80 Clause7.2.2 =0.90 Clause7.3.3.13

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e ISSN: 2395 0056

Volume: 09 Issue: 06 | Jun 2022 www.irjet.net p ISSN: 2395 0072

=0.648>0.7 =0.457KN/m2

PressureCoefficientsistakenfromIS875part3usingthefollowingvalues

PercentageAreaoftheOpening=9.65%(Between5%to20%)

Enclosurecondition= Partially Enclosed

ExternalPressureCoefficient Usetable4fromIS:875part3

Earthquake load EarthquakeloadcanbecalculatedusingIndianstandardcode1893

TocalculateearthquakeloadaccordingtoIndianstandardfollowIS1893part1.

a) Findzoneforthestructure

b) Thestructureissteelbuildingwithordinarymomentresistingframeandresponsereductionfactorforthestructureis 3

c) Importancefactor 1

d) Soiltype mediumsoil

e) Structuretype SteelMRFBuildings

f) Dampingratio 5%

g) Periodicaccelerationintimeperiod 0.32sec

h) Firstcalculateseismicweight followclause7.3.1table8IS:1893part1

i) Calculatefundamental clause7.6.2ofIS:1893part1

Fig DefiningseismicloadforthestructureinStaadpro

Designbaseshear followclause7.5.3ofIS:1893part1

3. RESULT

Followingresultarecompairedwitheachother

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e ISSN: 2395 0056

3.1 SUPPORT REACTION

Table SupportreactionresultfromStaadPro

Horizontal Vertical FxkN FzkN FykN

MaxFx 88.44 0.084 130.07

MinFx 88.43 0.083 130.10 MaxFy 0 0.001 313.436

MinFy 0.04 4.61 6.452

MaxFz 0.015 14.723 21.973 MinFz 0.024 14.73 36.62

MaxMx 20.784 0.056 48.817

MinMx 20.784 0.056 48.817 MaxMy 20.784 0.056 48.817

MinMy 20.784 0.056 48.817

MaxMz 20.784 0.056 48.817

MinMz 20.784 0.056 48.817

Table SupportreactionbyEtabs

TABLE: Base Reactions

Output Case FX FY FZ kN kN kN

Dead 0.0 0.0 181.3

Live 0.0 0.0 27.6

1.5(DL+LL) 0.0 0.0 82.4 1.2(DL+LL+WL1) 36.6 0.0 59.9 1.2(DL+LL+WL2) 13.9 0.0 39.6 1.2(DL+LL+WL3) 0.0 5.0 41.6 1.2(DL+LL+WL4) 0.0 0.2 61.9

1.5(DL+LL+WL1) 45.7 0.0 33.4

1.5(DL+LL+WL2) 17.6 0.0 8.0 1.5(DL+LL+WL3) 0.0 0.0 105.6 1.5(DL+LL+WL4) 0.0 0.0 36.0

0.9(DL)+1.5WL1 45.7 0.0 170.2

0.9(DL)+1.5WL2 17.4 0.0 83.3 0.9(DL)+1.5WL3 0.0 0.0 58.5 0.9(DL)+1.5WL4 0.0 0.0 19.5

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e ISSN: 2395 0056

Volume: 09 Issue: 06 | Jun 2022 www.irjet.net p ISSN: 2395 0072

3.2 Beam End Forces

Fig 1:supportreactionusingetabs

TABLE Beam End forces by staad Pro FxkN FykN FzkN MxkN m MykN m MzkN m

MaxFx 313.436 0 0.001 0 0 0 MinFx 14.427 0.017 0.149 1.2 1.498 0.215 MaxFy 57.543 158.13 0 0.001 0.004 523.103 MinFy 57.543 158.13 0 0.001 0.004 523.105 MaxFz 0.839 4.892 5.04 0.038 7.611 3.625 MinFz 2.139 8.111 5.04 0.038 9.273 9.017

MaxMx 0.697 6.392 2.116 1.923 8.024 3.288 MinMx 0.957 3.791 2.116 1.923 9.442 0.124 MaxMy 0.418 3.837 0.406 1.409 14.448 1.97 MinMy 0.699 6.372 0.408 1.409 14.64 3.28 MaxMz 57.543 158.13 0 0.001 0.004 523.105 MinMz 150.85 72.991 0 0 0 364.957

Table Beam End forces by ETABS

TABLE BEAM END FORCES

Type P V2 V3 T M2 M3

MAXP 67.4950 145.7338 0.0008 0.0070 0.0035 343.5496

MINP 83.1259 1.5565 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.8301

MAXV2 2.5212 165.1478 0.0089 0.0059 0.0172 497.4287

MINV2 5.2157 146.0349 0.0009 0.0070 0.0035 344.7351

MAXV3 21.9101 116.2113 0.0156 0.0059 0.0222 52.3802

MINV3 14.5278 116.2113 0.0156 0.0059 0.0222 52.3802

MAXT 5.9496 146.0348 0.0008 0.0070 0.0035 344.7346

MINT 13.0919 146.0349 0.0010 0.0070 0.0034 344.7351

MAXM2 28.3501 0.4330 0.0082 0.0034 0.0313 5.5319

MINM2 2.1094 0.4330 0.0082 0.0000 0.0313 5.5319

MAXM3 5.1489 4.6209 0.0013 0.0050 0.0024 348.2012

MINM3 4.6765 165.1477 0.0112 0.0059 0.0198 497.4299

©

| Page2876

2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e ISSN: 2395 0056

Volume: 09 Issue: 06 | Jun 2022 www.irjet.net p ISSN: 2395 0072

3.3 JOINT DISPLACEMENT RESULT

TABLE JointdisplacementbyStaadPro

Xmm Y mm Z mm Resultant mm rXrad rYrad rZrad

MaxX 9.627 14.42 0.127 17.339 0 0 0.001

MinX 9.62 14.42 0.128 17.34 0 0 0.001

MaxY 5.568 2513 0.012 6.109 0 0 0 MinY 2.65 24.5 0.03 24.657 0 0 0.01

MaxZ 0.003 0.037 29.561 29.561 0.004 0.002 0

MinZ 0.004 0.061 29.836 29.836 0 0 0

MaxrX 1.2 10.487 5.231 11.781 0.046 0.005 0.001

MinrX 1.202 10.502 5.268 11.81 0.05 0.01 0.001

MaxrY 0 0 0 0 0.001 0.051 0.001

MinrY 0 0 0 0 0.001 0.05 0.001

MaxrZ 0.907 9.266 0.036 9.311 0 0 0.004

MinrZ 0.91 9.264 0.036 9.309 0 0 0.004

MaxRst 0.004 0.061 29.836 29.836 0 0 0

Fig DisplacementdiagramresultusingStaadPro

Factor

value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page2877

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e ISSN: 2395 0056

Volume: 09 Issue: 06 | Jun 2022 www.irjet.net p ISSN: 2395 0072

Table JointdisplacementbyETABS

TABLE: Joint Displacements

Type Ux Uy Uz Rx Ry Rz mm mm mm rad rad rad

MAXX 9.107 0.001 15.18 0.000556 0.001083 0.000056

MINX 9.107 0.001 15.18 0.000556 0.001083 0.000056

MAXY 2.909E 07 27.712 0.417 0.003843 8.196E 11 4.003E 12

MINY 2.909E 07 27.712 0.417 0.003843 8.196E 11 3.867E 12

MAXZ 5.999 0.371 24.28 0.000072 0.000955 0.000037

MINZ 2.611 0.003 24.4 0.000576 0.002134 0.000058

MAXRx 0 0 0 0.005997 0.000007 0.000007

MINRx 0 0 0 0.005992 0.000007 0.000007

MAXRy 0.891 0.0002275 9.083 0.000265 0.003336 0.000027

MINRY 0.891 0.0002275 9.083 0.000265 0.003336 0.000027

MAXRz 0 0 0 0.001606 0.000022 0.001883

MINRz 0.002 7.968 0.026 0.001572 0.000039 0.001883

3.4 RENDERING

Fig RenderresultofPEBstructureusingETABS

©

| Page2878

2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e ISSN: 2395 0056

Fig RenderresultofPEBstructureusingStaadPro

3.5 Moment diagram

Fig BendingMomentdiagramusingEtabs

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e ISSN: 2395 0056

3. CONCLUSIONS



Fig BendingMomentdiagramusingStaadpro

Theresultgivenbyboththesoftwareisnotidenticalbutsomewhatsimilarin±5%range.

TheGUIofETABSsoftwareisbetterbutETABSsoftwaredoesn’thaveconnectiondesigningcapabilitiesanddepend uponothersoftwaretodoso.

TheStaadProhaveconnectiondesigningcapabilitiesandcandesignGenericconnectioninsidethesoftwareusingRAM Connectionlink.

Bothsoftwarecantransfersdatafromonesoftwaretoother.

REFERENCES

[1] GeetaMehta,BidhanSharmaandAnujKumar,(2016)OptimizationofMemberSizeandMaterialsforMultistoriedRCC BuildingsusingETABS

[2] T.SubramaniandK.Murali(2018)AnalyticalStudyofTallBuildingwithOuttriggerSystemwithRespecttoSeismicand WindAnalysisUsingETABS

[3] GuangfengWang(2014)ResearchonETABSSteelToweraTopBuildingStructuralSystem

[4] K.SurenderKumar,N.Lingeshwaran,SyedHamimJeelani(2020)AnalysisofresidentialbuildingwithSTAAD.Pro& ETABS

[5] YongheWua,JianchunMub,ShengqiangLicandHuifengXi(2011)DynamicResponseAnalysisonSteel Concrete CompositeFrameBasedonETABS

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e ISSN: 2395 0056

Volume: 09 Issue: 06 | Jun 2022 www.irjet.net p ISSN: 2395 0072

[6] YongweiSHAN,PaulGOODRUM,CarlHAAS,andCarlosCALDAS(2012)AssessingProductivityImprovementofQuick ConnectionSystemsintheSteelConstructionIndustryUsingBuildingInformationModeling(BIM)

[7] NitinK.Dewani,SanjayBhadke(2018)STUDYOFPRE ENGINEEREDBUILDING,IRJET

[8] Mr.VaibhavThorat,Mr.SamyakParekar2022PreEngineeringBuildingasaModernEra:AReview,IJRASET

[9] MitaaliJayantGilbile,S.S.Mane(2020)AReviewonComparativeStudyontheStructuralAnalysisandDesignofPre EngineeredBuilding[PEB]withConventionalSteelBuilding[CSB],IJERT

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook