Skip to main content

PROTECTING THE ONGOING DESIGN PROCESS IN INDIA - IMPLICATIONS AND CONTRACTUAL LIABILITIES OF TRADE S

Page 1

Pradeep Dabhade

Anagha Pathak

2395

Companies in India are looking at extensive outsourcing for the wide range of advantages it offers, like cut infrastructure costs, focus on core competencies, and/or obtain access to new, enhanced technologies. Outsourcing engagements require customers to share a high level of intellectual property, including know how, which risks theft or misappropriation of trade secrets, loss of IP rights, and reduced control of the outsourced function. Construction being a core design related field, it is established that development of new designs and related technologies is an integral part. Design is an ever evolving process and every design is unique. Hence, every project develops its own package, which is developed by the participants at different levels and phases of the project. Also, it is developed with available resources, but it produces a unique solution. Indian legislature must take steps and consider these design developments and the risks involved with it as part of a legal system.

KEYWORDS Outsourcing, intellectual property, trade secrets, new designs and related technologies, Indian legislature, legal system.

1. INTRODUCTION

During the project lifecycle of a particular project, there are many processes involved that are interdependent and interconnected. From the office to the site, there are many arenas involved.In such a case, outsourcing becomes a necessity, andnotmerelyatrend.Outsourcingmaybeevidentinconstructionindustryowingto

Absenceofprofessionals

Absenceoftoolsinhouse

Lack the budget and interest in hiring a full time employee to manage certain workflows like accounting, takeoff, compliance,etc.

LabourcostsbeinglowerincountrieslikeIndiaandChina

Outsourcing also has many legal implications. The most important sphere of knowledge when deciding whether to outsourceisthelegaldocumentationandotheraspectsrelatedtolawsandregulationsofthecountry.

Every country has different legal and regulatory requirements. Certain industries are regulated by federal and state laws,whilesomearedependentonmandatesaccordingtotheuniquefunction

In India, there is no law to specify and regulate outsourcing. However, the following laws are applicable in case of outsourcing

During the design and development phase of the project, it is critical to consider the legal and contractual implications involved. It is also important to note and understand that every country has its own legal and regulatory requirements Particularly in case of outsourcing, there are no generalized laws that govern outsourcing, only legal specifications and mandatesaccordingtotheuniquefunction.Fewmentionedbelowareapplicableinthepresentscenario

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e ISSN:
0056 Volume: 09 Issue: 04 | Apr 2022 www.irjet.net p ISSN:2395 0072 © 2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page3433 PROTECTING THE ONGOING DESIGN
PROCESS IN INDIA
-
IMPLICATIONS
AND CONTRACTUAL LIABILITIES
OF TRADE SECRETS IN OUTSOURCING CONSTRUCTION WORK
Ar. Shweta Naik(1), Adv.
(2), Ar.
(3) 1 Student S.Y.M.Arch Dr. D. Y. Patil College of Architecture Akurdi, Pune 2 Practicing Advocate, 3 Professor Dr. D. Y. Patil college of Architecture Akurdi, Pune *** ABSTRACT -
ï‚·
ï‚·
ï‚·
ï‚·
ï‚·
ï‚·
ï‚·

ISSN:2395

ISSN:2395

National Regulations

Indianlawregulatesthetransactionswiththefollowinglaws

ContractAct1872(ICA)

IndianStampAct1899

ReliefAct1963(SRA).

ofCivilProcedure1909

andConciliationAct1996

ExchangeManagementAct1999(FEMA)

InformationTechnologyAct2000(ITA).

propertylaws Theintellectualproperty relatedprovisionsinoutsourcingcontractsaregovernedbythe CopyrightAct1957(CopyrightAct),TradeMarksAct1999(TradeMarksAct),IndianPatentsAct,1970(PatentsAct) andDesignsAct2000(DesignsAct).Indiadoesnothavealawontradesecrets.

Process of Outsourcing in the Construction Industry

To exploit and maintain a competitive advantage requires discipline, efficiency, adaptability, and a singularity of purpose. Global competition has forced managements to re define, refine, and focus intensely on their companies' core competencies. This emphasis on core competencies has led to increased interest in contracting non core support functions to outside organizations aprocessknownasoutsourcing(CrinoandDrnevich,1999:2)

Mariotti, (1999: 1) defined outsourcing as a strategic decision to obtain goods or services from independent organizations outside of a company's legal boundaries; to purchase goods or services instead of making or performing them. Construction companieshavealways subcontractedtogainaccesstoresources beyondtheirindividual reach whetheritis skills,people, technology,productsormaterials.

Quinn,(1999:1)madethisextreme remark: "Ifyouare notbest in worldindoing something,andaredoingit in house,you are giving up a competitive edge. You could outsource to the best in the world, up the value and lower the cost". When companies downsize by intelligent outsourcing, they eliminate their inefficient activities and those employees not adding valuetothecompany.

Construction

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e
0056 Volume: 09 Issue: 04 | Apr 2022 www.irjet.net p
0072 © 2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page3434 1.1.
ï‚· Indian
ï‚·
ï‚· Specific
ï‚· Code
ï‚· Arbitration
ï‚· Foreign
ï‚·
ï‚· Intellectual
1.2.
Legalstructurescommonlyusedinoutsourcingare 1. Directoutsourcing 2. Multisourcing 3. Indirectoutsourcing 4. Jointventureorpartnership 5. Captiveentity 6. BuildOperateTransfer 1.3. Legal implications of Outsourcing
companies rushing into outsourcing without carefully considering their objectives may find themselves entangledinacontractualbattlewiththechosenoutsourcingpartnerorinaworsepositionthanbefore.

ISSN:2395 0056

ISSN:2395 0072

The relationship between the construction project management company and the outsourcing partner should be based on mutualtrust.

partnershipisawell designedcontract.Thecontractshouldbeflexibleto ensurethatmarketinnovationevolvesintotangiblebenefitsforbothparties.

foundationofaneffective

A company should always be wary of sharing too much information pertinent to its core competencies with its outsourcing partners.Partnerscontributetoaprocessofmutualdisclosureandconsensualagreements,andcontinuetoevolveaworking relationshipbasedoncommongoals.

1.4. Intellectual Property Rights

Intellectual Property includes copyrights, trademarks, patents and now, increasingly gaining popularity, trade secrets, However,thereislegislationin placefor everything excepttrade secrets. Patentsrideonthe factthattheinventionis novel, uniqueandnon obviouswhilebeingusefulaswell.Copyrightsprotectmannerofexpressionbutnotcontentorideabutonce theideaismaterializedinaform,itisprotected.Disclosureoftradesecretswillharmtheownerofthetradesecretand killthe idea and essence of the trade secret thus making it difficult to gain protection the way patents and trademark/ copyrights enjoyprotection.Iftradesecretsareexposedtothepublic,theycanneverbeevoked.

CopyrightAct,1957 CopyrightreferstothelegalrightoftheownerofIP.Insimplerterms,copyrightistherighttocopy.This meansthattheoriginalcreatorsofproductsandanyonetheygiveauthorizationtoaretheonlyoneswiththeexclusiverightto reproducethework.

TrademarksAct,1999 Amarkcapableof beingrepresentedgraphicallyandwhichiscapableofdistinguishingthegoodsor servicesofonepersonfromthoseofothers

Patents Act, 1970 An exclusive privilege given to the author by the State to prohibit anyone from utilizing, creating, and sellinganinventionforaspecifieddurationoftime

1.5. Need of the study

Indiadoesnothaveaspecifiedcodifiedlegislationtoprotecttradesecrets.Tradesecretsareconsideredwithintheframework of contract, competition and IP. Trade secrets can be protected by way of covenants, non disclosure agreements, other contractualmeans,actionagainstmisappropriationundercommonlaw,breachofconfidence,and/ortheft.

Intheconstructionindustry,wheretechnologicaladvancementsarefastpaced,theabsenceoflegislationfortradesecretscan giverisetomismanagement,failureofsmallbusinesses,andfinallyadisruptedeconomicalfabric.Intheeraofglobalization, manyconstructioncompaniesareoffshoringworkforvariousreasons,includingexpansionandcheaplabor.Inthiscase,the needforastrongerlegislationisevidentandofforemostconsideration.

As defined in the Black's Law Dictionary, "trade secret" is a "formula, process, device, or other business information that is keptconfidentialtomaintainanadvantageovercompetitors;informationincludingaformula,pattern,compilation,program, device,method,techniqueorprocess:

(1)Thatderivesindependenteconomicvalue,actualorpotential,fromnotbeinggenerallyknownorreadilyascertainableby otherswhocanobtaineconomicvaluefromitsdisclosureoruse,and;

(2)Thatisthesubjectofreasonableefforts,underthecircumstances,tomaintainitssecrecy."

1.6. Problem statement

The entire construction process is based on a unique design that has been developed as a customized solution. This design processisexecutedinstepswhereeverystephascertaindevelopmentsintermsofmaterialortechnology.Whenapartofthis process is outsourced, the developments are shared on a common database and are exposed to parties outside the core competencies.However,astheconstructionprocessisbasedonadesigndevelopedasanart,thissharingofinformation,and

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e
Volume: 09 Issue: 04 | Apr 2022 www.irjet.net p
© 2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page3435
The
strategic

a large

itunder

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e ISSN:2395 0056 Volume: 09 Issue: 04 | Apr 2022 www.irjet.net p ISSN:2395 0072 © 2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page3436 the design development thereof, need to be kept a secret. Since no two designs will ever be the same, replication of these secretsisnotnecessaryasincaseofpatentsorcopyrights.Andhence,thesedevelopments,duringtheprocessofconstruction, whichifreplicated,maycausethecompanytoloseitscompetitiveedge,shouldbeconsideredastradesecretsandrightfully protected. Theresearchquestionsidentifiedwereasfollows:  HowdoestheabsenceofIndianlegislationofprotectionoftradesecretimpactoffshoring  Howtodefinetradesecretsintheconstructionindustry,andsignifyitsimportanceduringoffshoringprocess Theobjectivesofthisresearchpaperwereidentifiedasfollows  Definetradesecretsasanessentialpartofthedesigningandexecutionprocess  Identifytheelementsmissingintheexistinglegislationofthemisuseoftradesecrets  Understandthenecessityofevolvingalegislationontradesecretintheprocessofoffshoring 1.7. Flow chart of work 2. METHOD The objective of this research is to understand the concept of trade secrets. In a design oriented field, and the inevitable technological advancement, especiallyincommunicationandexchange ofinformation, itismandatorytodefinea company’s edge over others. In a design field, not just the design, but even the technology used, the material combinations and specifications,and thecosting will be responsible for a companylosingitscompetitive edge overothercompanies to
extent.Thisresearchisaimedatdefiningtradesecretsasanongoingdesignanddevelopmentprocessandprotecting
law. Also, considering the rate at which outsourcing has been adopted in the construction sector, understanding the implicationsofoutsourcingontheparameterswhosesecrecyneedstobemaintainedisanessentialpartofthisresearch. Probable ways to implement additional clauses in contracts Data analysis of the survey data Data colletion from builders and outsourcing companies Design of questionnaire Define objectives and problem statement Identification of scope and need of study Literature survey Study concept of IP nad trade secrets Selection of topic
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e ISSN:2395 0056 Volume: 09 Issue: 04 | Apr 2022 www.irjet.net p ISSN:2395 0072 © 2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page3437 2.1. Participants in the Survey CompanyAislocatedinAurangabad.Ithasbeenestablishedin2004andworkson BIM modelsforprojectsbasedinUnited States of America. Company B is based in Pune and works on projects based in Australia and United States of America. However, company B has also outsourced administration and execution services to contractors outside the company but withinIndia. Thedifferentmodelsofworkingoftheabovetwocompaniesfacilitatedthestudyandsurveyofthisresearchpaper. 2.2. Factor analysis ThestudyofcontractofcompanyAandcompanyBwasqualitative.Itwasfollowedbyopenendedquestions Thequestionnairecontainedclosedendedformat  ImportanceQuestions  DichotomousQuestions  RatingScaleQuestions  Othertypeofquestions  Hypotheticalquestions 2.3. Sampling procedure The questionnaire was shared with 5 companies located in India, and builders involved with large scale projects. Since architectsplayedamajorroleinthesurvey,itwasrecommendedthatthequestionnairebefilledbyArchitects.Architectsare involvedwiththedesigndevelopmentphaseofaprojectandhence,tradesecretsandotherintellectualpropertiesareclosely relatedtothem. Qualitative analysis (Exploratory) Contract study of 2 outsourcing companies, A and B Analysing the IP clauses in contracts of A and B Floating questionnaire to 5 outsoucing companies and 5 builders Analysing data and sample collection through google forms Connecting the google form responses to the contracts studied Identifying the need to revise contractual agreements

International

Volume:

ISSN:2395 0056

ISSN:2395 0072

The questionnaires were based on the fact that businesses in the 21st century have nontraditional challenges and are in the middle of extreme technological advancement. Trade secrets and outsourcing, both are comparatively new developments in the construction sector. Hence, the open ended questions for Company A and Company B were basic questions about understandingtheintricaciesoftheexistinglegalsysteminIndia.Thequestionnairesfocusedonapprovalofnewpracticesin theconstructionsectorandthechallengesassociatedwiththem.

3. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

3.1. Contract analysis out Company A and Company B

From the discussions with proprietors and consultants from Company A and Company B, it is observed that outsourcing models in India are typical and since projects are located outside the Indian legislature, IP rights is not a point of concern. However,incaseofprojectdelays,anddisputesatsitehaveanuneasyeffectonserviceprovidersinIndia. Theoutsourcingof any services, where employees of a third party supplier are deployed to provide services to a customer in its premises (or premisesunderthecustomer'ssupervisionandcontrol),isregulatedundertheContractLabour(Regulations andAbolition) Act1970(CLRA)whichmayalsogiverisetotheftofintellectualproperty.

3.2. Questionnaire

major points were included such as:

outsourcingbeenabeneficialmodel?

DoesoutsourcingandoffshoringaviableoptioninIndia?

Reason for increase in outsourcing in construction industry (cheap labour, competitive attitude, automation, global presence)

4. Which of the following acts are/should be part of an outsourcing contract (Copyrights Act, IP rights, Labour Acts, InformationtechnologyAct)

5. Whatarethepertinentrisksinvolvedwiththedesignprocessintheconstructionindustry (completionoftheproject, intellectualproperty,practicality,staff)

Which of these models will you prefer to use during outsourcing in the construction industry? (captive entity, bot, partnership,jointventure)

youawareofthetermtradesecrets?

youthinktradesecretscanbeapartoftheconstructionindustry

haveoutsourcedwork,doyouthinkyourdesignsmaybecopied?

youincludeanyclauseinyourcontracttoprotectyourdesign?

youfeeltheneedtosecrecyduringthedesigndevelopmentstage?

youfeeltheneedtosecrecyduringthedesignconstructionstage?

youevercomeacrosselementsofyourdesigninotherdesignersprojects?

youfeeltheneedtodefinethissecrecyintheformofanyIPright?

youcopyrightyourdesign?

youpatentyourdesign?

youthinkacustomizeddesignmaybeapartofIP?

thereariskfactorofleakageoftradesecretinvolvedwhen

anygoverningbodieshavetheauthoritytotakeactionfortheftofintellectualproperty?

Indianlegislaturehelp

withtheftof

designs?

not a term known widely amongst the construction industry

from

known only in terms of copyrights and patents, both of which are not a viable option for

have the

risks

are

adopted for its advantages and the financial stability

Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e
09 Issue: 04 | Apr 2022 www.irjet.net p
© 2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page3438
Following
1. Has
2.
3.
6.
a. Are
b. Do
ï‚· It is observed
the questionnaire that trade secrets are
participants. ï‚· Intellectual property is
designers ï‚· Outsourcing models do
anticipated
but
still
andeconomics 9. Ifyou
10. Do
11. Do
12. Do
13. Have
14. Do
15. Can
16. Can
17. Do
18. Is
outsourcing 19. Do
20. Does
you
your
3.3 Findings

ISSN:2395 0056

ISSN:2395 0072

CONCLUSION

There is a need to educate people about

that fall under the category. It is also a mandate to

the

process.

5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

law,

playersareinvolved,asincaseofoutsourcingmodels.

maybeabletoprovethattheongoingdesignprocessisa tradesecretanditneedsprotection

would like to express my gratitude towards my external guide Adv. Pradeep Dabhade and internal guide, Prof. Anagha Pathak, for their expert guidance

I would like to thank my family and colleagues for their support

continuous

encouragement.Iamgratefultoallmyfriendsandacquaintanceswhohavecontributedtomystudy.

REFERENCES

ofoutsourcing

backofficepro.com

Narendran,Swarnima,SamsuddhaMajumder,Deepthi

AditiGoyal,AmulyaChinmaye,KartikeyKulshrestha,Anjana4.Ravi,ChetaSheth,SohailHafesjeeandHardeep SinghChawla 01 Jun 2021 Outsourcing:Indiaoverview

tradesecretsinIndia,1May2018,RNAtechnologiesandIPattorneys

tradesecretsinIndiaintheabsenceofaregime 9june2020,khuranaandkhurana.com

tradesecrets India

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e
Volume: 09 Issue: 04 | Apr 2022 www.irjet.net p
© 2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page3439  Thereisaneedtoprotectthedesignprocess,throughoutthelifecycleoftheproject  TheabsenceofLegislatureisamajorsetback 4.
trade secrets and the contents
protect
design
Ifthesetwoneedscanbecombined,we
under
especiallywhenoutside
I
and
encouragement.
and
ï‚· Legalimplications
article
ï‚· Nikhil
ï‚· Rajeev,
ï‚· Protecting
ï‚· Protecting
ï‚· Azbpartners.com,

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook