International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) Volume: 09 Issue: 11 | Nov 2022
www.irjet.net
e-ISSN: 2395-0056 p-ISSN: 2395-0072
A Review paper on "Improve the Quality of product" 1
Dr. Dipesh Patel, 2 Asst Prof. Nikul Patel, 3 Chauhan Mayank, 4 Zala Darshan, 5 Rana Jatin, 6 Dabhi Mitesh
Head of the institute, 2Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering Department. 3,4,5,6 Students of D. A. Degree Engineering & Technology, Mahemdabad-Gujarat. ----------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------1
Abstract
to reduce costs. This misconception in companies therefore prevents ergonomics allowing within enterprises’ product systems or quality operation systems (Neumann & Dull, 2010). Although utmost manufacturers have lately established product system approaches as top procedures for product, the part of ergonomics has been seen more as forestallment of musculoskeletal diseases (MSDs) than as a tool for quality development. According to the literatures, adverse ergonomic threat factors impact not only mortal well- being but also mortal performance, similar as adding rejection rates and dwindling product quality (Govindarajan, Panther, & Mittal, 2001 Kazimierz, Neumann, & Winkel, 2007). The costs of crimes and failures were estimated about 10 – 40 of a company’s income (Falck & Rosenquist, 2012). Several studies suggest that crimes, rejection rates, and revamping would drop significantly with the integration of ergonomics in the product system (da Silva, Puffer, & Amaral, 2012). The new strategy of the SCANIA group for the time 2020 is to produce,000 exchanges,000 motorcars, and,000 machines with the same staff. They believethat it would be possible to reach this thing if they could achievezero failures.[1][2]
Quality is a factor that must be prioritized in the manufacturing industry's competitive market in order to gain market share. Quality improvement and performancebased thinking must go hand in hand. This objective is the focus of the concepts of Lean Manufacturing, Six Sigma, Lean Six Sigma, Total Quality Management, Theory of Constraints, and its combination. This study is a survey of the literature on the application of various philosophies to raise the quality of systems' processes and outputs. It also discusses how these philosophies compare and contrast with the Zero-defect Manufacturing (ZDM) philosophy. A total of 45 publications have been examined for this investigation. These publications were chosen after a search using particular keywords across a number of scientific libraries. The methodology is founded on a table of data that was taken from each study. the data consulted.
Keywords:
Theory of constraints, total quality management, lean manufacturing, six sigma, philosophy of quality improvement, and review.
INTRODUCTION
Williams ital., 1992). nonetheless, directors see ergonomics as a rigorously health and safety tool that's useful for injury/ illness forestallment rather of feting its eventuality to ameliorate productivity and quality and A study in this group showed that ergonomics and the work terrain could help to help the frequent circumstance of product failures (poor quality; illegal & muftis, 2012). The Volkswagen group verified the need for ergonomicsin the product system to help health hazards, to optimize product time, and to ameliorate product quality (Toledo, 2012). Dull and Neumann (2009) showed a link between business factors and ergonomic design of the plant, and Neumann, Ekman, and Winkel (2009) emphasized the integration of ergonomics in the product system. Bettini, Facciolo, Persona, and Sugarbush (2011) developed a new 14 step integrated methodological model to achieve productivity and quality performance in an assembly system in which different tools, similar as assembly time dimension, ergonomic evaluation, and ergonomic advancements, were integrated. This frame was tested in two case studies and showed enhancement in line inflow and in inflexibility (Bettini ital. 2011). Integration of ergonomics in enterprises’ strategies or product systems of manufacturing has therefore surfaced. Companies should be
Artificial companies and manufacturers have to be competitive as they face new challenges in the artificial world. Advanced quality, lower waste, and effectiveness are important factors to achieve success in the request (Falck & Rosenquist, 2012; Torstar om, Apprizes, Christianson, & Eklund,2008). Companies have always tried to attain lesser effectiveness and the least cost in their processes. Numerous disciplines were thus introduced, similar as Taylor’s proposition, total quality operation (TQM), Six Sigma, the Toyota Production System, spare operation, and kaizen (Lileah & Mufti, 2012). The main idea of these tools is to define a set of principles and mechanisms to induce methodical enhancement in the process to achieve client satisfaction and reduce waste (Torstar om ital., 2008). ¨ still, utmost of the quality operation approaches focuses on styles and tools to gain advantages, while mortal aspects have been ignored or paid little attention to. Reports in the literature have stated that, without considering the ergonomic approach, quality operation disciplines won't achieve their pretensions (Hines, Hollweg, & Rich, 2004; illegal & muftis’, 2012; Tale Ghani, 2010;
© 2022, IRJET
|
Impact Factor value: 7.529
|
ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal
|
Page 843