International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)
e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 11 Issue: 10 | Oct 2024
p-ISSN: 2395-0072
www.irjet.net
Navigating the Testing Terrain: A Comparative Study of Manual and Automated Testing Approaches Deepika Panchal1, Prof. Vinod Kumar2, Prof. Aditya Kumar3 1M.Tech (Computer Science & Engineering) II Year, H.R. Institute of Technology, Ghaziabad, India 2Electronics & Communication Engineering, H.R. Institute of Technology, Ghaziabad, India
3Computer Science & Engineering, H.R. Institute of Technology, Ghaziabad, India ---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract - In This research paper presents a relative study
from requirements gathering to deployment and maintenance. Its significance lies in its ability to detect defects, validate functionality, ensure compliance with specifications, and ultimately deliver a robust and highquality software product. Effective testing practices not only enhance the user experience but also mitigate risks, reduce costs, and bolster the overall success of software projects.
between manual and automation testing methodologies in a web application environment by using Wikipedia as the testing platform. The Research compared the time measurements across the three repetitions for steps which is conducting like opening the website and specific clicks (#talk, #view sources, #view history) to demonstrate efficiency. The observation involved configuring Chrome browser as well as ChromeDriver for automation testing with Selenium and manual testing conducted by testers. Key metrics are accuracy, time efficiency, repeatability, and coverage were evaluated to assess the effectiveness of each testing approach. The results are indicated that automation testing normally achieved lower average times for each step according to the manual testing, highlighting its higher efficiency in executing actions within the web application environments. The study put valuable perception into software testing operation and offers advice for future research to increase testing strategies further. The standard deviation values also displays consistency in performance across repetitions for both testing methods.
The human involvement test case creation, execution, result verifications, malfunctioning is all only executed by manual testers. Flexibility, attention, high level experience, user interaction and better understanding these things can be experienced by manual testing. But there is some drawback also involve in manual testing such as high time consumption, man power, human limitation, and accuracy. Difficult to achieve accurate testing results. If we look other side automatic generation of results and form data laminar testing process errorless continuous improvement and can be achieved high speed with self-correcting mechanism. The main purpose is to comparisons between manual and automation testing method its driving sources and its imitations. Some points are mentions below:
Key Words: Testing Strategies, Repeatability, Manual Testing, Automated Testing, Web Application Testing, Selenium, ChromeDriver, Software Quality, Coverage, Comparative Analysis.
1. Efficiency and Time Management: Evaluate the time taken for test execution, test coverage, and resource utilization in manual vs. automated testing scenarios.
1.INTRODUCTION
2. Cost-Effectiveness: Analyze the cost implications associated with manual and automated testing in terms of upfront investments, ongoing maintenance, and long-term ROI.
In the scope of software development, testing stands as an crucial foundation which is ensuring the reliability, functionality, and quality of software products. with the fast progress in technology and the ever-increasing complexity of software systems, automated testing has emerged as a compelling alternative, promising enhanced efficiency, scalability, and accuracy in the testing landscape. A testing process has always been manual testing, which is executed by human testers. This research paper immerse into the relative analysis of manual and automated testing methodologies, aim to provide valuable perception and perspectives for practitioners and organizations navigating the challenging terrain of software testing.
3. Scalability and Maintenance: Explore the scalability of testing efforts, ease of test maintenance, and adaptability to evolving software requirements. 4. Accuracy and Reliability: Assess the accuracy of test results, defect detection capabilities, and consistency of outcomes in both testing approaches. 5. Real-world Applications and Case Studies: Include realworld sample, case research, and industry best practices highlight the practical implications and success stories of manual and automated testing implementations across diverse software projects and domains.
Software testing plays a pivotal role in the software development lifecycle (SDLC), encompassing various phases
© 2024, IRJET
|
Impact Factor value: 8.315
|
ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal
|
Page 750