Issuu

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 10 Issue: 08 | Aug 2023

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

Analysis of G+2 building with seismic load using Etabs Chethan V R1, Ashwini B T2, Deepak M3 1Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Technology, Chikkamagaluru 2Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Technology, Chikkamagaluru 3 P G Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Technology, Chikkamagaluru

-------------------------------------------------------------------------***-----------------------------------------------------------------------1. Load calculation and selection Abstract— Civil Engineers are facing a great challenge in structural designing. The design must fulfil various parameters which include economical structure, durability and serviceability. But taking these points in mind it becomes very difficult for an Engineer to fulfil all these requirements at a time when a design is performed manually. This dissertation presents research on digital tools used in civil engineering and comparing their results by taking in mind the requirements of the above points. In this research process a building is taken for analysis and design on well-known Software ETABS. Based on the results taken from the Software some comparison is done with manual analysis for residential building.

Determine the various loads acting on the structure, including dead loads, live loads, wind loads and seismic loads based on the local building codes and standards. 2. Selection of structural system Choose an appropriate structural system, such as a reinforced concrete (RCC) framed structure, considering factors like material availability, local construction practices and the buildings intended use. 3. Structural analysis using Etabs Utilize the Etabs software to perform a detailed structural analysis of the building. Input the building geometry, materials, loads and constraints. The software will provide a various output including structural reactions, internal forces and deflection.

Nowadays every designing organisation is using these Software but there is a question mark to which software we must go for designing. The parent organisations which have developed these designing tools promote their Software by showing all the positive points. In addition to this they are trying to fill all the loop holes which they found in their products but it will never happen that another developing company will put the points in light what the negative points are there in existing products. They keep on improving to deliver their best. In this project work I will present the difference for future users to which tool you must go through to acquire your needs. I am not saying that some products are not ok at all. I have designed a residential building with proper loading which is being designed on both ETABS. Manual calculations make it crystal clear the difference between the Software. Key word: Etabs Software, residential building.

structural

4. Manual calculation validation Perform manual calculations for critical section of the building, such as beams, columns and slabs to validate the results obtained from the software this helps ensure the accuracy of the analysis and design.

5. Design of structural element Based on the analysis design, design the various structural element such as beams, columns, slabs and footings. Ensure that they are sized appropriately to carry the calculated loads and satisfy the safety and serviceability criteria.

design,

6. Reinforcement details

1. INTRODUCTION

Provide detailed reinforcement layouts for each structural element, ensuring proper cover, spacing and arrangements of reinforcement bars. This is crucial for the structural integrity and durability of the building.

In designing an economical and stable RCC framed building for residential use involves a comprehensive approach, considering both computer-based software tools like CSI-Etabs and manual calculations. Here’s a general outline of the steps is might undertake.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Abhay Guleria (2014): it’s interesting to observe that in the analysis of a multi-storey building, the storey

Impact Factor value: 8.226

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

Page 688