Research study on Optimization of Cost and Duration with Line of Balance by Using MSP and Primavera

Page 1

Research study on Optimization of Cost and Duration with Line of Balance by Using MSP and Primavera

Abstract This research is about the MIVAN technology and the balance technique line. In addition, this section compares project planning using MSP and Primavera. MIVAN is an aluminum formwork system. MIVAN was invented by a European construction company. In 1990, MIVAN started to produce formwork in Malaysia and the company was renamed MIVAN. This technique is widely used in Europe, the Middle East and Asia. Formwork is described as a temporary structure that serves as a foundation for the permanent structure of the building. MSP Project Management is a well-regarded solution for managing various projects for various clients. P6 is often used as a standalone program in this category. Line of balance (LOB) is a management control method used in the construction industry for projects that involve blocks of repetitive work activities, such as highways, pipelines, tunnels, railways and high-rise buildings, as well as prefabricated buildings and terraced houses. . As the country's population grew, the construction process became exponentially more difficult. As we all know, the construction of high-rise buildings is becoming more and more popular. However, the construction process of these high-rise buildings takes longer, so modern technology is used to reduce the length and cost of the project. New sophisticated technology is produced for the construction of multi-storey projects, resulting in the creation of cost-effective and expedited project construction.

Keyword: MIVAN, MSP, LOB, PRIMAVERA

1. INTRODUCTION

Line of balance (LOB) is a control management process usedintheconstructionindustrywheretheprojectcontains blocks of repetitive work activities such as roads, pipelines, tunnels, railways and high-rise buildings, prefabricated buildings, townhouses, etc. Process when collecting facts about time, cost and schedule performance, all projectrelated tasks are compared to a specific plan. LOB displays process, project status, continuity of team size and work background, time and phase of project activities, provides management with measurement tools. LOB helps project management by comparing the formal goal with actual progress, examining only deviations from established plans

***

and measuring their degree of severity with respect to the rest of the project, addressing problem and problem areas, andsolvingproblemswithinspecificconstraints.

1 Predictingfutureperformance.

2 Theprogrammednumberofcompletedunitsismet.

3 Aconstantrateofrepetitiveworkismaintained.

4 Workers and the plant are constantly moving through the project to maintain and fully employ a balancedworkforce.

5 Thecostbenefitsofrepetitiveworkareachieved

Line-of-balance (LOB) is a variation of linear scheduling methods that allows operations to be balanced so that each activity is performed continuously. The main advantage of the LOB methodology is that it provides information about thespeedanddurationofproductionintheformofaneasyto-interpretgraphicformat.ALOBchartcanshowataglance what is wrong with an activity flow and can reveal potential future bottlenecks. It is clear that LOB allows a better understanding of a project composed of repetitive activities than any other planning technique, because it allows adjustingtheproductionrateofactivities.Allowssmoothand efficient

1.1. MIVAN Technology

MIVAN is essentially an aluminum formwork system. The MIVAN system was an invention of a construction company from Europe. In 1990, MIVAN from Malaysia started producingformwork,thennamed MIVAN.Thistechnologyis widelyusedinEurope,Gulf countriesandAsia.Formwork is defined as a temporary structure whose purpose is to support a building structure. The development of formwork atthesamedistanceastheprogressofconcreteconstruction in the 20th century. Nowadays, modern technology must be required because the population is growing and the land available for building houses is limited. For a mass housing project, it is essential to know new technologies for quick project completion, quality service life and wear resistance. MIVAN technology is able to construct a huge no. home in a short time. MIVAN formwork can be easily removed. All activities can be easily arranged and the result is more

© 2023, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page715
PG. Student, M. Tech, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Sanjay Ghodawat University, Atigre, Kolhapur 1 Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Sanjay Ghodawat University, Atigre, Kolhapur 2
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
10 Issue: 01 | Jan 2023 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
Volume:

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 10 Issue: 01 | Jan 2023 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

accurate,bettercontrollableandhigherqualityproductionat economywithshortertime.

2. METHODOLOGY

It is difficult for a project manager to know what activity is taking place on a particular floor when it comes to a constructionprojectthatisbrokendownintoalargenumber of activities. The Line of Balance planning technique can be applied to a project consisting of repetitive activities, as it facilitates continuous monitoring of the project at each milestone.

Themainobjectiveofthisstudyistodrawa balancelinefor repetitive activities and compare the actual and delayed workineachstageofworkandsummarizetheactivitiesthat arecriticalanddrawconclusions.

 CostofFlat:64.4LakhsOnwards

 StructuralEngineer:JWconsultant

 Builder:KoltePatil

 Area:1.91acre

 ResidentialbuildinghavingNo.ofTowers:6,Towers No.ofFloors:14Floors,No.ofUnits:462Units.

 Thisprojectisbasedonsustainablestructure

 Presentconditionoftheproject:underconstruction

 No.ofTowers:6,TowersNo.ofFloors:14Floors,No. ofUnits:462Units

4. DATA ANALYSIS OF CASE STUDY

1.1 Rate analysis is done to workout rates used in construction

The BBS is generated from the working drawings and the MSP plan is prepared from the data obtained on site. Importantaspectsofqualityplanningsuchastime,resources suchasmachineandmaterialvariablesareincorporatedinto theMSPplanforqualitycosts

Table 1 CostConcreteWork

3. STUDY AREA

 Nameofsite:stargaze

 Location of site : Bavdhan, West Pune zone, Pune, Maharashtra411021

 DesignTeam:JWconsultancy

 OwnerandDeveloper:KoltePatil

 Architect:ManojTatuskarandVikasAcharikar

© 2023, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page716
1.1 Stargaze Fig1Stargaze
Sr No DESCRIPTION Concrete Quantity (meter cube) Cemen t Cost Sand Cost Agg Cost 1 QuantityOfConcrete InPCC 11.592 17994. 49344 22127. 87143 81842.8 1213 2 QuantityOfConcrete InFooting 47.817 29690 9.1418 18255 4.9393 225067. 7334 3 QuantityOfConcrete InColumnGFloorTo 10thFloor 165.6 10282 56.768 63222 4.8979 779455. 3536 4 QuantityOfConcrete InColumn11thTo 14thFloor 28.566 17737 4.2925 10905 8.7949 134456. 0485 5 QuantityOfConcrete InBeamPlinthBeam To14thFloor 287.49898 8 14876 34.764 60331 8.543 223145 2.145 6 QUANTITYOF CONCRETEINSLAB 1stTO14thFLOOR 477.33302 4 24699 11.999 10016 86.533 202083 7.09 7 QuantityOfConcrete InUnderGround Tanks 158.88328 82212 5.644 33341 7.6223 123318 8.466 8 QuantityOfConcrete InTopTerraceTanks 24.72448 12793 4.3493 51884. 48611 191901. 524 9 Total 1202.0147 72 64281 41.452 29362 73.688 689820 1.173 STUDY OF MIVAN STUDY OF LOB SITE DATA COLLECTION MSP /PRIMAVERA MODELLING COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS CONCLUSION

Table3TotalProjectDurationInDays

© 2023, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page717
Sr. No Bar Size Weight of Bar in kg Cost per kg Total cost 1 8 mm 44088.66676 42 1851724.004 2 12 mm 2181.224999 42 91611.44997 3 16 mm 42375.25049 42 1779760.521 4 20 mm 10911.56755 42 458285.8371
Table 2 SteelCost 1.2 MSPAND PRIMAVERA Scheduling Fig2DayscountforNormalConstruction Fig2CostsforConventional Fig3DayscountforMIVANTechnology Fig4CostsforMIVANinMSP Fig6DayscountforMIVANTechnology Fig7CostsinPrimavera
TotalProjectDurationInDays Conventional MIVANInMSP MIVANInPrimavera 992 476 394 International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 10 Issue: 01 | Jan 2023 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072

Volume: 10 Issue: 01 | Jan 2023

3. Acasestudyona housingprojectwaspreparedand the results of a comparison of traditional formwork and MIVAN technology were found. MIVAN technology has proven to be suitable for large construction projects and can be reused about 200300times.

4. Despite the significant initial investment in the MIVANtechnology,itdeliversacost-effectiveproject and there is no need for plastering as it provides a betterfinishthanconventionalformwork.

5. Using MIVAN technology, project duration can be shortened. As a result, MIVAN technology is unsuitableforsmall-scaleapplications.

6. By using the number of employees, the breakeven technique is useful in evaluating the rate of productionofeachactivity.

7. Increasing the workforce will speed up project output, but increasing the workforce will increase costs.

8. The use of VICO Control 2009 software helps in successful planning and visualization of activity planningandschedulingateachsite.

9. You can compare the activity rate calculated from thebalancingformularow.

10. The required resources, i.e. the required manpower, can be determined using a formula that gives both theoreticalandactualresults.

5.

1. As the country's population grows, so does the workload of the construction process. As we all know, the construction of high-rise buildings is becomingatrend,andsincetheconstructionprocess of these high-rise buildings takes longer, modern technologies are used to reduce the length and cost oftheproject.

2. A new sophisticated technology is developed for building multi-storey projects, resulting in costeffectiveandfastprojectconstruction.

11. The purpose of this study is to investigate and put into practice the LOB method and the VICO control tool for calculating the total duration of a high-rise residential building project. Based on the results, a better approach to project planning from the LOB and VICO tool will be chosen for the calculation of project progress lines. The LOB technique and the VICOtoolaregraphical representationsofrepetitive tasks that allow the project manager to evaluate projected and actual production rates and make the necessarydecisions.

12. The standard shuttering technique is widely used throughouttheworld,although itincreasesthetime and cost of the construction operation. Classic formwork is unsuitable in areas with a high population, limited usable land and rapid

© 2023, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page718 Fig8TotalProjectDurationInDays Table4TotalProjectDurationInDays TotalProjectCostInCr Conventional MIVANInMSP MIVANInPrimavera 4.92 7.21 7.34 Fig9TotalProjectDurationInDays
CONCLUSION
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
p-ISSN:
www.irjet.net
2395-0072

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 10 Issue: 01 | Jan 2023 www.irjet.net

construction work. The MIVAN formwork system fulfillsallthis.

13. MIVAN technology delivers improved results in terms of cost effectiveness, speed of construction anddurabilityofthebuildingstructure.

14. Construction speed can be achieved using MIVAN formwork in a 4-day cycle per floor. It is possible to remove the floor slab forms without removing the support, but they are not conventional. The traditional system has a displacement that is 86% greaterthantheMIVANdesignsystem.

6. REFRENCES

[1] Mr.Trahash K. Matey, Col. B. K. Bhonde Asst. Prof , Asst . Prof. Sudhanshu Pathak , Mr. Bharat Kholia,'A Case Study: Line of Balance (LOB) Method for HighRiseResidentialProject',Vol-3Issue-42017

[2] HishamA.AbouIbrahim&FarookR.Hamzeh,'Roleof Formwork Systems in High-Rise Construction',April 2016

[3] Pawan M. Walvekar, Hemant L. Sonawadekar, 'Seismic Performance Evaluation of MIVAN Structural System v/s Conventional Structural System with Effect of SSI by Pushover Analysis',Volume:04Issue:06|June-2017

[4] Danish Sadruddin Ansari, Pratik SudhakarKudale', Comparative Analysis of MIVAN Formwork Building andConventional Formwork BuildingBasedonCost and Duration',Volume No.5, Issue No.8,1 August 2016

[5] Pacheco, M. T. G., and Heineck, L. F. M. (2008). EncontroNacionaldeTecnologiadoAmbienteConstruí do,Fortaleza.Anais...Fortaleza:ENTAC.

[6] Arditi, D., Tokdemir, O. B., and Suh, K. (2002). “Challenges in Line-of-BalanceScheduling”. ASCE, J. ofConstr.Engrg.AndMgmt.,128:545-556.

[7] IJRET: International Journal of Research in EngineeringandTechnologyISSN:2319-1163|ISSN: 2321-7308 Volume: 03 Special Issue: 09,NCETCE2014,June-2014

[8] KushalPatil, AjitkumarJadhav, Nikhil Shingate, ‘’MIVAN TechnologyIJRET: International Journal of ResearchinEngineeringandTechnology,ISSN:23210869,Volume-3,Issue-6,June2015’’

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

[9] Thiyagarajan, V.Panneerselvam, K. Nagamani, ‘’Aluminium formwork system using in high-rise buildingsconstruction’’Volume8,Issue6,Nov -Dec 2017

[10] P.P.Pattanshetti,H.B.Patil,‘’MIVANtechnology’’

[11] Naveen V.Chikkaveerayanavar1, NareshPatil, ‘’planning and scheduling of shuttering system for multi-storeyedbuilding’’,IJRET:InternationalJournal ofResearchinEngineeringandTechnology,Volume: 04Issue:07,July-2017

[12] SirseGurulingRamling, PatilYogendra.Ramesh, ‘’MIVANformworktechnology’’,ISSN:2454-8499,Vol. 2,SpecialIssue1,March,2016

[13] Prof. R. B. Bajare, ShubhamDeshmukh, AshwinMahajan, RoohiKarnataki, Indrayani V. Patil, ‘’Remedies to the common deficiencies faced in MIVAN technology at malinrehabilitation’’,Volume 14,Issue2Ver.IV(Mar.-Apr.2017)

© 2023, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page719

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Research study on Optimization of Cost and Duration with Line of Balance by Using MSP and Primavera by IRJET Journal - Issuu