International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 13 Issue: 03 | Mar 2026 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
A REVIEW OF HARMONIC MITIGATION-ORIENTED DESIGN OF A MODIFIED CASCADED MULTILEVEL INVERTER FOR MEDIUM-POWER INDUSTRIAL DRIVE SYSTEMS
Shruti Sagar Shukla1, Dr. Imran Khan2
1Master of Technology, Electrical Engineering (Power System), Azad Institute of Engineering and Technology, Lucknow, India
2Professor, Department Electrical Engineering (Power System), Azad Institute of Engineering and Technology, Lucknow, India ***
Abstract - The increasing demand for high-performance medium-power industrial drive systems has intensified the need for power electronic converters capable of delivering high-qualityoutputvoltagewithminimalharmonicdistortion. Multilevel inverters (MLIs) have emerged as an effective solution for improving power quality due to their ability to synthesize staircase-like voltage waveforms with reduced switching stress and lower total harmonic distortion (THD). Among various MLI topologies, the cascaded H-bridge multilevelinverter(CHB-MLI)hasgainedsignificantattention becauseof its modular structure,scalability,andsuitabilityfor medium-voltage and medium-power industrial applications. However, conventional CHB inverters still face several challenges, including a high number of power semiconductor devices, multiple isolated DC sources, and increased control complexity. To address these limitations, researchers have proposed several modified cascaded multilevel inverter (MCMLI)configurationsfocusedonreducingcomponentcount while maintaining or improving harmonic performance. This review paper presents a comprehensive survey of harmonic mitigation-oriented design strategies for modified cascaded multilevel inverters used in medium-power industrial drive systems. The paper discusses the fundamental principles of multilevelinvertertechnology,conventionalandmodifiedCHB topologies, and various harmonic mitigation techniques such as pulse width modulation methods, selective harmonic elimination, and optimization-based control approaches. Furthermore, the paper summarizes recent research developments, compares different inverter configurations in terms of harmonic performance and structural complexity, andhighlights emergingtrends andresearchgaps.Thereview aims to provide a consolidated understanding of harmonic mitigationstrategiesinmodifiedcascadedmultilevelinverters for improving efficiency, reliability, and power quality in modern industrial drive applications..
Key Words: Multilevel Inverter, Cascaded H-Bridge Inverter, Harmonic Mitigation, Industrial Drive Systems, Pulse Width Modulation, Total Harmonic Distortion.
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of Industrial Drive Systems
Industrial drive systems play a crucial role in modern manufacturingandprocessingindustriesbyenablingprecise control of electric motors used in applications such as pumps, compressors, conveyors, fans, and machine tools. These drives are responsible for regulating speed, torque, and operational efficiency of industrial machinery, which directly affects productivity and energy consumption. Medium-power industrial drives, typically ranging from a few kilowatts to several hundred kilowatts, are widely employed in sectors such as chemical processing, water treatment,mining,andautomatedproductionsystems.The integration of power electronic converters in these drives hassignificantlyimprovedmotorcontrolperformanceand energy efficiency compared with traditional electromechanicalcontrolmethods(Bose,2002).
1.1.1 Power Quality Requirements in Industrial Environments
Inindustrialenvironments,maintaininghighpowerquality isessentialforensuringreliableandefficientoperation of electrical equipment. Power quality refers to the stability andpurityofelectricalvoltageandcurrentsuppliedtoloads. Poor power quality can lead to overheating of motors, malfunction of sensitive electronic devices, and increased system losses. Industrial facilities often contain nonlinear loadssuchasvariablespeeddrives,rectifiers,andswitching converters, which can introduce voltage distortion and current harmonics into the electrical network. Therefore, modern industrial drive systems must be designed with appropriate power electronic configurations and control strategies that minimize distortion and maintain stable operation under varying load conditions (Arrillaga and Watson,2003).
1.2 Harmonics and Their Impact on Industrial Drives
Harmonicsaresinusoidalcomponentsofvoltageorcurrent whosefrequenciesareintegermultiplesofthefundamental
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 13 Issue: 03 | Mar 2026 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
frequency of the power system. In inverter-based motor drives, harmonics are primarily generated due to the switching action of power semiconductor devices and nonlinear characteristics of loads. Harmonic distortion is typicallyquantifiedusingTotalHarmonicDistortion(THD), whichrepresentstheratioofharmoniccomponentstothe fundamental component of the waveform. Excessive harmonic distortion can degrade the quality of electrical power and negatively affect the performance of industrial drivesystems(Akagi,2017).
1.2.1 Effects on Motors, Transformers, and Grid Stability
Thepresenceofharmonicsinindustrialpowersystemscan cause several adverse effects on electrical equipment. In electricmotors,harmoniccurrentsleadtoadditionalcopper andironlosses,resultinginincreasedheatingandreduced efficiency. Harmonics can also produce torque pulsations thatcausevibrationandacousticnoiseinmotordrives.In transformers, harmonic currents increase core losses and may lead to insulation stress and premature failure. Furthermore, harmonics injected into the utility grid can causevoltagedistortion,interferencewithcommunication systems,andinstabilityinpowerdistributionnetworks.Asa result,effectiveharmonicmitigationtechniquesareessential formaintainingreliableoperationofindustrialdrivesystems andensuringcompliancewithpowerqualitystandardssuch asIEEE519(Akagi,2017).
1.3 Multilevel Inverters as a Solution
Multilevel invertershave emergedasanimportant power electronic solution for reducing harmonic distortion in medium-andhigh-powerapplications.Unlikeconventional two-level inverters that produce only two voltage levels, multilevelinvertersgeneratemultiplediscretevoltagelevels bycombiningseveralpowersemiconductordevicesandDC sources. This capability enables them to produce output waveforms that more closely resemble sinusoidal signals. Consequently, multilevel inverters can achieve lower harmonicdistortion,reducedvoltagestressacrossswitching devices, and improved overall efficiency compared with traditional inverter topologies (Rodriguez, Lai and Peng, 2002).
1.3.1 Advantages over Conventional Two-Level Inverters
Oneofthemajoradvantagesofmultilevelinvertersistheir ability to reduce switching losses and electromagnetic interferenceduetolowervoltagestepchangesintheoutput waveform. The staircase voltage waveform generated by multilevel inverters approximates a sinusoidal waveform with smaller harmonic components, thereby reducing the need for bulky output filters. Additionally, these inverters distribute voltage stress across multiple semiconductor switches, which enhances reliabilityand allowstheuse of
lower-rateddevicesinhigh-powerapplications.Becauseof these benefits, multilevel inverters have become widely adoptedinindustrialdrives,renewableenergysystems,and high-voltagepowerconversionapplications(Rodriguez,Lai andPeng,2002).
1.4 Modified Cascaded Multilevel Inverters
Among the various multilevel inverter topologies, the cascadedH-bridge(CHB)inverterhasgainedconsiderable attentionduetoitsmodularstructureandeaseofcontrol.In a conventional CHB inverter, multiple H-bridge cells are connectedinseries,eachsuppliedbyanisolatedDCsource, toproduce multiplevoltage levelsattheoutput.Although thisconfigurationprovideshigh-qualityoutputwaveforms and improved harmonic performance, it also introduces severalpracticalchallenges.Specifically,therequirementfor multipleisolatedDCsourcesincreasessystemcomplexity, cost, and design difficulty. In addition, a large number of powersemiconductordevicesandgatedrivercircuitsmay increase switching losses and control complexity (Malinowski,GopakumarandRodriguez,2010).
Toovercometheselimitations,researchershaveproposed modifiedcascadedmultilevelinverter(MCMLI)topologies that aim to reduce the number of switches, minimize DC source requirements, and improve harmonic suppression performance.Thesemodifiedconfigurationsoftenemploy hybridstructures,asymmetricvoltagesources,oroptimized switching strategies to enhance system efficiency while maintaining high-quality output voltage waveforms. As a result, MCMLIs are increasingly considered promising candidates for medium-power industrial drive systems where reliability, efficiency, andpower qualityarecritical designconsiderations.
1.5 Scope and Organization of the Review Paper
This review paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of harmonic mitigation-oriented design approachesformodifiedcascadedmultilevelinvertersused inmedium-powerindustrialdrivesystems.Thepaperbegins by discussing the fundamentals of multilevel inverter technologyandtheoperationalcharacteristicsofcascaded inverter topologies. Subsequently, different modified cascadedmultilevelinverterconfigurationsproposedinthe literature are analyzed with emphasis on their harmonic mitigation capabilities and structural advantages. The review further examines various harmonic reduction techniques, including modulation strategies and optimization-based switching methods. Finally, the paper presents a comparative analysis of existing approaches, identifies research gaps, and outlines potential future directions for improving the performance and practical implementation of modified cascaded multilevel inverter systemsinindustrialapplications.
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 13 Issue: 03 | Mar 2026 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
2. FUNDAMENTALS OF MULTILEVEL INVERTER TECHNOLOGY
2.1 Overview of Multilevel Inverter Topologies
Multilevel inverter (MLI) technology has become an importantadvancementinpowerelectronicsformediumandhigh-powerapplications.Unlikeconventionaltwo-level inverters that generate only two voltage states, multilevel inverters produce multiple discrete voltage levels by combiningseveralswitchingdevicesandDCvoltagesources. Thiscapabilityallowstheinvertertosynthesizeastepped outputvoltagewaveformthatmorecloselyapproximatesa sinusoidal waveform. As a result, multilevel inverters significantly reduceharmonicdistortion, switchinglosses, andvoltagestressacrosssemiconductordevices.Becauseof these advantages, MLIs are widely applied in industrial motordrives,renewableenergysystems,high-voltagedirect currenttransmission,andflexibleACtransmissionsystems (Rodriguez, Lai and Peng, 2002). Over the years, several multilevelinvertertopologieshavebeendeveloped,among which the Neutral Point Clamped (NPC), Flying Capacitor (FC),andCascadedH-Bridge(CHB)invertersareconsidered themostprominentstructures.
2.1.1 Neutral Point Clamped (NPC)
Inverter
The Neutral PointClamped (NPC) inverter, alsoknown as the diode-clamped multilevel inverter, was one of the earliestmultilevelconvertertopologiesintroducedforhighpowerapplications.Inthisconfiguration,clampingdiodes are used to connect the midpoint of the DC bus to the switching devices, thereby enabling the generation of multiple voltage levels. A typical three-level NPC inverter divides the DC-link voltage into two equal parts using capacitorsandusesclampingdiodestocontrolthevoltage acrosstheswitchingdevices.ThemainadvantageoftheNPC topologyisitsabilitytosharevoltagestressamongmultiple switches, allowing the use of lower-rated semiconductor devices in high-voltage applications. However, as the numberofvoltagelevelsincreases,thenumberofclamping diodesrequiredgrowssignificantly,whichincreasescircuit complexityandmakesvoltagebalancingmorechallenging (Nabae,TakahashiandAkagi,1981).
2.1.2 Flying Capacitor (FC) Inverter
TheFlyingCapacitor(FC)inverterisanotherwidelystudied multilevel topology that replaces clamping diodes with capacitors connected between switching nodes. These capacitors act as floating voltage sources that enable the generationofmultipleoutputvoltagelevels.Oneofthekey advantagesoftheFCinverterisitsflexibilityincontrolling voltagelevelsandtheabilitytoprovideredundantswitching states,whichcanbeusedtobalancecapacitorvoltages.This featureimprovesthereliabilityandcontrolcapabilityofthe system.However,themajorlimitationofthistopologyisthe requirementofalargenumberofcapacitorsasthenumber
of voltage levels increases. The additional capacitors increasesystemcost,physicalsize,andcontrolcomplexity, which may limit its practical implementation in some industrialapplications(Peng,2001).
2.1.3 Cascaded H-Bridge (CHB) Inverter
TheCascadedH-Bridge(CHB)inverterconsistsofmultiple single-phase H-bridge cells connected in series, with each cell powered by an independent DC source. By combining theoutputsofindividualH-bridgemodules,theinvertercan generate multiple voltage levels at the output. The CHB topology offers several advantages, including modular structure,simplecontrolstrategy,andtheabilitytoexpand thenumberofvoltagelevelsbyaddingadditionalH-bridge cells.Duetoitsmodularityandscalability,thecascadedHbridge topology is widely adopted in medium- and highpowermotordrivesystems,particularlyinapplicationssuch aselectricdrives,renewableenergyintegration,andhighvoltagepowerconversion.Furthermore,themodulardesign simplifies maintenance and improves system reliability compared with other multilevel inverter structures (Malinowski,GopakumarandRodriguez,2010).
2.2 Advantages of MultilevelInvertersinIndustrial Drives
Multilevelinvertersofferseveraladvantagesthatmakethem highly suitable for industrial drive applications. These advantages primarily arise from their ability to generate multiple voltage levels, which improves the quality of the output waveform and reduces electrical stress on system components. As industrial processes increasingly demand efficient and reliable motor control systems, multilevel inverter technology has become a preferred choice for medium-andhigh-powerdriveapplications.Theimproved waveform quality reduces the need for bulky filters, enhances system efficiency, and ensures compliance with powerqualitystandardsinindustrialpowersystems(Bose, 2002).
2.2.1 Reduced Harmonic Distortion
One of the most significant advantages of multilevel invertersistheirabilitytoreduceharmonicdistortioninthe output voltage waveform. Because the output voltage is generatedthroughmultiplesmallvoltagestepsratherthan largetransitionsbetweentwolevels,theresultingwaveform closelyapproximatesasinusoidalsignal.Thisreductionin harmonic components decreases the Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) of the system and improves the overall power quality supplied to the motor drive. In practical implementations, increasing the number of voltage levels significantly decreases harmonic distortion; for instance, THDmayreducefromapproximately34%inathree-level inverter to nearly 17% in a seven-level inverter under similar operating conditions. This improvement enhances
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 13 Issue: 03 | Mar 2026 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
motorperformanceandreducesthermalstressonelectrical components.
2.2.2 Lower Switching Losses
Multilevel inverters also contribute to reduced switching lossesinpowerelectronicdevices.Inconventionaltwo-level inverters, switches must handle the full DC-link voltage, resultinginhigherswitchingstressandgreaterenergyloss duringswitchingtransitions.Incontrast,multilevelinverter structuresdividetheDC-linkvoltageacrossmultipledevices, reducingthevoltagestressonindividualswitches.Because the voltage change during switching is smaller, the associatedswitchinglossesarereduced.Thischaracteristic allows multilevel inverters to operate efficiently at higher power levels while maintaining acceptable thermal conditions for semiconductor devices (Rodriguez, Lai and Peng,2002).
2.2.3 Improved Electromagnetic Compatibility
Another important advantage of multilevel inverters is improvedelectromagneticcompatibility(EMC)inindustrial environments. The smaller voltage steps produced by multilevel inverters lead to lower rates of voltage change (dv/dt)comparedwithconventionalinverters.Lowerdv/dt reduces electromagnetic interference (EMI), minimizes insulation stress on motor windings, and decreases the likelihoodofbearingcurrentsinmotordrives.Asaresult, multilevel inverter-based drive systems provide more reliable operation and longer equipment lifespan. These benefitsareparticularlyimportantinindustrialapplications where sensitive electronic systems and communication equipment operate alongside high-power motor drives (Bose,2002).
3. CASCADED MULTILEVEL INVERTER TOPOLOGY
3.1 Structure and Operating Principle of CHB Inverters
TheCascadedH-Bridge(CHB)multilevelinverterisoneof the most widely used multilevel converter topologies for medium- and high-power applications. It is particularly suitable for industrial motor drive systems because of its modulardesign,simplecontrolstructure,andcapabilityto produce high-quality output voltage waveforms. In this topology, multiple H-bridge power cells are connected in series on the AC side, and each cell is supplied by an independentDCvoltagesource.Byproperlycontrollingthe switchingstatesofindividualH-bridgecells,theinvertercan generate multiple voltage levels that approximate a sinusoidalwaveform.ThemodularnatureofCHBinverters allowseasyexpansionofvoltagelevelsbyaddingadditional H-bridgemodules,makingthetopologyhighlyscalablefor different power ratings and voltage requirements (Rodriguez,LaiandPeng,2002).
3.1.1 Basic H-Bridge Cell Configuration
The fundamental building block of a cascaded multilevel inverteristheH-bridgepowercell.EachH-bridgeconsistsof four power semiconductor switches arranged in a bridge configuration along with appropriate gate driver circuits. TheH-bridgecellissuppliedbyaDCvoltagesourceandcan produce three different output voltage levels: positive DC voltage (+Vdc), zero voltage (0), and negative DC voltage (−Vdc). These voltage levels are generated by activating specificpairsofswitchesinthebridge.Forexample,turning ononediagonalpairofswitchesproducesapositiveoutput voltage,whileactivatingtheoppositediagonalpairproduces anegativevoltage.Whenthetwoswitchesonthesameleg areturnedonsimultaneously,theoutputvoltagebecomes zero.ThisswitchingcapabilityallowseachH-bridgecellto contributeacontrolledvoltageleveltotheoverallinverter output(Bose,2002).
3.1.2 Cascaded Connection of H-Bridge Modules
Inacascadedmultilevelinverter,multipleH-bridgecellsare connected in series to form a multilevel output voltage waveform. Each module contributes its individual voltage leveltothetotaloutputvoltageoftheinverter.IfnH-bridge cellsareconnectedinseries,theinvertercangenerate2n+1 voltagelevels.Forexample,twocascadedH-bridgemodules can produce a five-level output waveform, while three modulescangenerateaseven-levelwaveform.Byincreasing the number of modules, the output voltage waveform becomes smoother and more closely approximates a sinusoidalsignal.Thismodulararchitecturealsoimproves systemreliabilitybecausefaultymodulescansometimesbe bypassed or replaced without affecting the entire system. Due to these advantages, cascaded H-bridge inverters are widely applied in medium-voltage motor drives, static synchronouscompensators,andrenewableenergysystems (Malinowski,GopakumarandRodriguez,2010).
3.2MathematicalRepresentationofOutputVoltage
The output voltage of a cascaded multilevel inverter is obtainedbysummingthevoltagecontributionsfromeach individual H-bridge module. The mathematical representation of the inverter output voltage is useful for analyzingwaveformcharacteristics,harmoniccomponents, and modulation strategies used in practical implementations. Understanding the mathematical formulation of the CHB inverter output helps engineers design appropriate control algorithms for harmonic reductionandefficientoperationofindustrialdrivesystems.
3.3 Limitations of Conventional CHB Inverters
Although cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverters provide several advantages such as modularity and improved harmonic performance, conventional CHB configurations alsoexhibitcertainpracticallimitations.Theselimitations
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 13 Issue: 03 | Mar 2026 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
mainly arise from the requirement of multiple DC voltage sources,increasedhardwarecomplexity,andsophisticated controlstrategiesneededforproperoperation.Addressing these challenges has motivated researchers to develop modifiedcascadedmultilevelinvertertopologiesthatreduce componentcountandsimplifysystemimplementation.
3.3.1
Requirement of Multiple DC Sources
One of the primary limitations of the conventional CHB inverteristherequirementformultipleisolatedDCvoltage sources,oneforeachH-bridgemodule.Inmanyindustrial applications, obtaining several independent DC sources is difficultandmayrequireadditionalpowerconversionstages suchasrectifiersorisolatedtransformers.Thisrequirement increasessystemcomplexity,cost,andinstallationspace.In renewableenergyapplications,separateDCsourcesmaybe available naturally (such as photovoltaic modules), but in typicalindustrialmotordrivesystemsthisrequirementcan poseasignificantdesignchallenge(Rodriguez,LaiandPeng, 2002).
3.3.2
Increased Component Count
Anotherlimitationoftheconventionalcascadedmultilevel inverteristheincreased numberof powersemiconductor switchesandassociatedgatedrivercircuitsrequiredasthe numberofvoltagelevelsincreases.EachadditionalH-bridge cell requires four switching devices, which increases hardware complexity and overall system cost. The large numberofcomponentsmayalsoreducesystemreliability due to the higher probability of component failure. Furthermore, increased device count leads to higher conductionlossesandlargersystemsize,whichcanlimitthe practicaldeploymentofhigh-levelCHBinvertersincertain industrial applications (Malinowski, Gopakumar and Rodriguez,2010).
3.3.3 Control Complexity
Control complexity is another challenge associated with conventional CHB inverter systems. As the number of cascaded modules increases, the control algorithm must managemultipleswitchingstatesandensurepropervoltage balancing among the DC sources. In addition, advanced modulation techniques are often required to minimize harmonic distortion and optimize switching performance. Implementingthesecontrolstrategiesrequiressophisticated digital controllers and complex gating signal generation schemes.Consequently,developingefficientandsimplified control techniques remains an active research area in multilevelinvertertechnologyforindustrialdrivesystems (HolmesandLipo,2003).
4. MODIFIED CASCADED MULTILEVEL INVERTER TOPOLOGIES
4.1 Modified Topologies
AlthoughconventionalcascadedH-bridge(CHB)multilevel invertersofferseveraladvantagessuchasmodulardesign, improvedwaveformquality,andscalabilityformedium-and high-power applications, practical implementation often reveals several technical limitations. These limitations include the requirement of multiple isolated DC voltage sources,ahighnumberofsemiconductorswitchingdevices, andincreasedcontrolcomplexity.Asthenumberofvoltage levelsincreases,thesechallengesbecomemorepronounced, resultinginhighersystemcostandreducedpracticalityfor industrial applications. To overcome these issues, researchers have proposed modified cascaded multilevel inverter (CMLI) topologies that aim to achieve similar or improvedperformancewhilereducinghardwarecomplexity and improving harmonic suppression capability. These modified structures often integrate innovative circuit configurations and advanced modulation strategies to optimizeinverterperformanceforindustrialdrivesystems (Rodriguezetal.,2010).
4.1.1 Reduction in DC Sources
One of the major motivations for developing modified cascaded multilevel inverter topologies is to reduce the numberofrequiredDCvoltagesources.InconventionalCHB inverters,eachH-bridgemodulerequiresaseparateisolated DC source. While this arrangement is suitable for applicationssuchasphotovoltaicsystemswheremultipleDC sourcesnaturallyexist,itbecomesachallengeinindustrial drive systems where only a single DC supply may be available.ModifiedCMLIstructuresattempttoaddressthis issue by using techniques such as switched capacitor networks,diodeclampingarrangements,orsharedDC-link configurations. By minimizing the number of required DC sources,thesetopologiessimplifysystemdesignandreduce theneedforadditionalpowerconversionstages(Guptaand Jain,2014).
4.1.2 Improved Harmonic Performance
Another important motivation behind modified cascaded inverter topologies is the need for improved harmonic performance.Industrialdrivesystemsrequirehigh-quality outputvoltagewaveformswithminimalharmonicdistortion to ensure efficient motor operation and compliance with power quality standards. Modified CMLI designs often employ optimized switching configurations, additional voltagelevels,oradvancedmodulationtechniquestoreduce TotalHarmonicDistortion(THD).Byincreasingtheeffective number of voltage levels or optimizing switching angles, thesetopologiescangenerateoutputwaveformsthatmore closely resemble sinusoidal signals, thereby reducing
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 13 Issue: 03 | Mar 2026 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
harmonic currents and associated losses in motors and powersystems(HolmesandLipo,2003).
4.1.3
Reduced Power Semiconductor Devices
The reductionofpower semiconductor devicesis another key objective in the development of modified cascaded multilevelinvertertopologies.ConventionalCHBinverters require four switches per H-bridge module, which means that the number of switching devices increases rapidly as morevoltagelevelsareadded.Ahighernumberofswitches not only increases the cost of the inverter but also complicates gate driver circuits and increases switching losses. Modified topologies aim to generate more voltage levelsusingfewerswitchesbyemployingalternativecircuit configurations such as switched capacitor cells, diodeassisted structures, or integrated bridge arrangements. Reducingthenumberofswitchingdevicesimprovessystem efficiency, decreases control complexity, and enhances overallreliability(Sabaetal.,2018).
4.2 Classification of Modified CMLI Topologies
Modified cascaded multilevel inverter topologies can be broadlyclassified basedon their circuit configurationand operating principles. Researchers have proposed several innovative designs that improve performance while addressing the limitations of conventional CHB inverters. Thesemodifiedconfigurationstypicallyfocuson reducing component count, improving harmonic performance, or enablingoperationwithfewerDCvoltagesources.Among themostcommonlystudiedmodifiedstructuresarereduced switch count inverters, hybrid multilevel inverters, and asymmetriccascadedinverterconfigurations.
4.2.1
Reduced Switch Count Inverters
Reducedswitchcountmultilevelinvertersaredesignedto producemultiplevoltagelevelsusingasmallernumberof powersemiconductordevicescomparedwithconventional CHB structures. These topologies often utilize special switching arrangements or auxiliary components such as diodes or capacitors to generate additional voltage levels withoutsignificantlyincreasinghardwarecomplexity.The mainobjectiveofthesedesignsistoreducecostandimprove efficiency while maintaining acceptable harmonic performance.Suchconfigurationsareparticularlybeneficial inindustrialapplicationswherecompactdesignandreduced systemcostareimportantconsiderations(GuptaandJain, 2014).
4.2.2
Hybrid Multilevel Inverters
Hybrid multilevel inverter topologies combine features of differentmultilevelinverterstructurestoachieveimproved performance characteristics. For example, hybrid configurationsmayintegratecascadedH-bridgecellswith diode-clampedorflyingcapacitorstructurestoreducethe number of DC sources and improve voltage balancing
capabilities.Bycombiningdifferenttopological principles, hybrid inverters can achieve higher voltage levels, lower harmonicdistortion,andimprovedefficiencycomparedwith conventionaldesigns.Thesesystemsareincreasinglybeing investigatedforapplicationsinmedium-voltageindustrial drivesandrenewableenergysystemswhereflexibilityand efficiencyareessentialdesignrequirements(Rodriguezet al.,2010).
4.2.3 Asymmetric Cascaded Inverters
Asymmetriccascadedmultilevelinvertersrepresentanother important class of modified CMLI topologies. In these configurations,theDCvoltagesourcesconnectedtodifferent H-bridge modules have unequal voltage magnitudes. By selecting appropriate voltage ratios, such as binary or trinary progression, asymmetric cascaded inverters can generate a larger number of output voltage levels using fewer inverter cells. This approach significantly improves the voltage resolution and reduces harmonic distortion without requiring a large number of switching devices. Asymmetriccascadedstructuresareparticularlyattractive for applications where higher voltage levels are required withminimalhardwarecomplexity(LezanaandRodriguez, 2009).
4.3 Comparison Between Conventional and Modified Topologies
Tobetterunderstandtheadvantagesofmodifiedcascaded multilevelinvertertopologies,itisusefultocomparethem with conventional CHB structures in terms of design complexity,componentcount,andharmonicperformance. Conventional CHB inverters provide excellent modularity andscalabilitybutoftenrequirealargenumberofswitches and isolated DC sources. Modified CMLI topologies aim to addresstheselimitationsbyoptimizingcircuitconfiguration andreducingcomponentrequirementswhilemaintainingor improvingharmonicperformance.
Table 1 Comparison Between Conventional CHB and Modified CMLI Topologies
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 13 Issue: 03 | Mar 2026 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
5. HARMONIC GENERATION AND MITIGATION TECHNIQUES
5.1 Sources of Harmonics in Inverter-Based Drives
Harmonics in inverter-based industrial drive systems primarily arise due to the switching nature of power electronic converters and the nonlinear characteristics of electricalloads.WheninvertersconvertDCpowerintoAC usingsemiconductorswitchingdevices,theresultingvoltage waveformistypicallynon-sinusoidalandcontainsmultiple frequency components. These harmonic components can propagate through the electrical system, affecting motor performance, increasing losses, and degrading power quality.Understandingthesourcesofharmonicgenerationis essential for designing effective mitigation techniques in multilevel inverter-based industrial drives (Arrillaga and Watson,2003).
5.1.1
Switching Harmonics
Switchingharmonicsaregeneratedasadirectconsequence ofthehigh-frequencyswitchingoperationsofsemiconductor devices such as IGBTs and MOSFETs used in power electronic inverters. During the switching process, the outputvoltagewaveformchangesabruptlybetweendiscrete voltagelevels,producingharmoniccomponentsatmultiples oftheswitchingfrequencyanditssidebands.Althoughhigh switching frequencies help reduce low-order harmonics, theymayintroducehigher-frequencycomponentsthatcan causeelectromagneticinterferenceandadditionalswitching losses. Proper selection of switching frequency and modulation strategies is therefore essential to minimize theseundesirableharmoniceffects(HolmesandLipo,2003).
5.1.2
Motor-Load Interaction
Anothersignificantsourceofharmonicsininverter-driven systems arises from the interaction between the inverter output and the electrical characteristics of the motor and mechanical load. Induction motors and other electric machines possess nonlinear magnetic properties that can introduceadditionaldistortionincurrentwaveformswhen supplied with non-sinusoidal voltage. These harmonic currentsmayleadtotorquepulsations,increasedvibration, andacousticnoiseinthemotordrivesystem.Additionally, the interaction between inverter switching patterns and motorimpedancecanamplifycertainharmoniccomponents, furtheraffectingsystemperformance(Bose,2002).
5.1.3
Nonlinear Loads
Nonlinearloadsconnectedtoindustrialpowersystemsalso contribute to harmonic generation. Devices such as rectifiers, switching power supplies, and variable speed drives draw non-sinusoidal currents even when supplied withsinusoidalvoltage.Thesenonlinearcurrentwaveforms containharmoniccomponentsthatpropagatethroughthe
electrical network and interact with inverter-generated harmonics.Asaresult,thecombinedharmonicdistortionin industrial power systems may increase significantly if appropriate filtering or mitigation techniques are not implemented(Akagi,2017).
5.2 Pulse Width Modulation Techniques
Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) is one of the most widely usedtechniquesforcontrollingpowerelectronicinverters and mitigating harmonic distortion in output voltage waveforms.InPWM-basedcontrol,theswitchingstatesof semiconductor devices are modulated according to a reference signal to produce a desired AC waveform. By adjusting parameters such as modulation index and switching frequency, PWM techniques can significantly influence the harmonic performance of the inverter. Properly designed PWM strategies can reduce total harmonicdistortion(THD),improvewaveformquality,and enhance the efficiency of inverter-based industrial drive systems(HolmesandLipo,2003).
5.2.1 Sinusoidal PWM (SPWM)
Sinusoidal Pulse Width Modulation (SPWM) is one of the simplestandmostcommonlyusedmodulationtechniquesin inverter control. In SPWM, a sinusoidal reference signal representingthedesiredoutputvoltageiscomparedwitha high-frequency triangular carrier signal. The intersection pointsbetweenthesetwosignalsdeterminetheswitching instantsoftheinverterswitches.Asaresult,thewidthofthe generated pulses varies in proportion to the sinusoidal reference waveform, producing an output voltage that approximatesasinusoidalwaveform.SPWMiswidelyused because of its simplicity and ease of implementation, although it may not always provide optimal harmonic performanceforhigh-levelmultilevelinvertersystems.
5.2.2 Space Vector PWM (SVPWM)
Space Vector Pulse Width Modulation (SVPWM) is an advanced modulation technique that utilizes the space vector representation of three-phase voltages to control inverter switching states. Instead of directly comparing reference and carrier signals, SVPWM determines the appropriate switching vectors within the inverter voltage space to synthesize the desired output waveform. This methodallowsbetterutilizationoftheDCbusvoltageand typicallyproduceslowerharmonicdistortioncomparedwith conventional SPWMtechniques.SVPWM iswidelyused in high-performance motor drives and multilevel inverter applicationsbecauseofitsimprovedefficiencyandenhanced controlflexibility(Rodriguez,LaiandPeng,2002).
5.2.3 Carrier-Based PWM Techniques
Carrier-based PWM techniques are widely applied in multilevelinvertersystemswheremultiplecarriersignals areusedtogenerateswitchingpatternsfordifferentvoltage
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 13 Issue: 03 | Mar 2026 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
levels. In these techniques, several triangular carrier waveformsarecomparedwithasinglesinusoidalreference signaltoproducetherequiredswitchingpulses.Depending ontherelativephasearrangementofthecarriers,different strategiessuchasphase-disposition(PD),phase-opposition disposition (POD), and alternate phase-opposition disposition(APOD)canbeimplemented.Thesetechniques are particularly suitable for multilevel inverter configurations because they enable efficient generation of multiple voltage levels while maintaining acceptable harmonicperformance(Kouroetal.,2010).
5.3 Selective Harmonic Elimination (SHE)
Selective Harmonic Elimination (SHE) is a widely used harmonic mitigation technique in multilevel inverter systems. Unlike conventional PWM methods that rely on high switching frequencies, SHE focuses on eliminating specific harmonic components by carefully selecting switching angles within each voltage cycle. This approach allowssignificantreductionoflow-orderharmonics,which aretypicallythemostharmfultopowersystemsandmotor drives. SHE is particularly effective in multilevel inverters where multiple switching angles are available for optimization(PatelandHoft,1973).
5.3.1
Principle of SHE
Thefundamentalprincipleofselectiveharmonicelimination isbasedonthemathematicalrepresentationoftheinverter outputvoltageusingFourierseriesexpansion.Byselecting appropriateswitchingangleswithina quartercycleofthe output waveform, certain harmonic components can be forced to zero while maintaining the desired fundamental voltagemagnitude.Theswitchinganglesaredeterminedby solvingasetofnonlinearequationsderivedfromtheFourier series coefficients of the inverter output voltage. This technique allows the elimination of specific lower-order harmonics such as the 5th and 7th harmonics, which significantlyimprovesoverallpowerquality.
5.3.2 Switching Angle Optimization
DeterminingtheoptimalswitchinganglesforSHErequires solvingnonlineartranscendentalequations,whichbecomes increasingly complex as the number of voltage levels increases. Traditional numerical techniques such as Newton–Raphsonmethodshavebeenusedforsolvingthese equations; however, they may suffer from convergence issues for higher-level inverters. Therefore, modern approaches often employ computational algorithms to determineoptimalswitchinganglesthatminimizeharmonic distortion while maintaining the required output voltage magnitude(HolmesandLipo,2003).
5.4 Optimization-Based Harmonic Reduction
Inrecentyears,optimization-basedtechniqueshavegained significant attention for harmonic reduction in multilevel inverter systems. These techniques utilize computational algorithmstodetermineoptimalswitchingparametersthat minimize total harmonic distortion and improve inverter performance.Optimization-basedmethodsareparticularly useful for complex inverter topologies where analytical solutionsforswitchinganglesmaybedifficulttoobtain.By applying intelligent search algorithms, researchers can identifyoptimalsolutionsforharmoniceliminationinhighlevel multilevel inverter structures (Sivanagaraju and SrinivasaRao,2010).
5.4.1 Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO)
Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is a population-based optimizationalgorithminspiredbythecollectivebehaviorof birdsandfish.Inthecontextofmultilevelinverters,PSOcan beusedtodetermineoptimalswitchinganglesthatminimize harmonic distortion while maintaining the desired fundamentalvoltagecomponent.Eachparticleintheswarm representsapotentialsolution,andthealgorithmiteratively updatesparticlepositionsbasedonindividualandcollective experiences. PSO is widely used because of its fast convergence and ability to handle nonlinear optimization problemseffectively.
5.4.2 Genetic Algorithms (GA)
GeneticAlgorithms(GA)areanotherpopularoptimization techniqueusedforharmoniceliminationininvertersystems. GA is based on principles of natural selection and genetic evolution,wherecandidatesolutionsevolveoversuccessive generations to achieve optimal results. In harmonic mitigationapplications,GAcanoptimizeswitchinganglesor modulation parameters to minimize THD in multilevel inverter output voltage. The algorithm employs processes such as selection, crossover, and mutation to generate improvedsolutionsineachiteration(Goldberg,1989).
5.4.3 Other Metaheuristic Methods
In addition to PSO and GA, several other metaheuristic optimization algorithms have been explored forharmonic mitigationinmultilevelinverters.Theseincludetechniques such as ant colony optimization, differential evolution, simulatedannealing,andfireflyalgorithms.Suchmethods are capable of solving complex nonlinear optimization problemsandcaneffectivelydetermineoptimalswitching parameters for high-level inverter topologies. The applicationoftheseadvancedoptimizationtechniqueshas significantlyimprovedtheharmonicperformanceofmodern multilevel inverter systems used in industrial drive applications(Kouroetal.,2010).
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 13 Issue: 03 | Mar 2026 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
6. LITERATURE REVIEW
The development of multilevel inverter technology has attracted significant attention from researchers due to its abilitytoimprovepowerqualityandefficiencyinmediumand high-power applications. Over the past few decades, numerous studies have focused on inverter topologies, harmonic mitigation techniques, and advanced control strategies to enhance inverter performance in industrial drivesystems.Theliteraturerevealscontinuousprogressin designing efficient multilevel inverter structures with improved harmonic performance, reduced hardware complexity, and optimized control methods. This section reviews major research contributions related to conventional multilevel inverter structures, harmonic mitigationtechniques,modifiedcascadedmultilevelinverter designs,optimization-basedharmonicreductionapproaches, andtheirapplicationsinindustrialmotordrivesystems.
6.1 Review of Conventional Multilevel Inverter Research
Earlyresearchonmultilevelinvertertechnologyprimarily focusedonthedevelopmentofthreefundamentalinverter topologies: the Neutral Point Clamped (NPC), Flying Capacitor(FC),andCascadedH-Bridge(CHB)inverters.One of the earliest contributions was the introduction of the diode-clampedmultilevelinverter,whichutilizedclamping diodes to generate multiple voltage levels from a split DC bus. This topology enabled improved voltage handling capabilityandreducedharmonicdistortioninhigh-power applications. Later studies explored the flying capacitor inverter, which uses floating capacitors to generate additional voltage levels and provide flexible voltage balancing capabilities. Although the FC topology offers redundantswitchingstatesandimprovedvoltagecontrol,its practical implementation requires a large number of capacitors, which increases system complexity (Nabae, TakahashiandAkagi,1981).
Subsequent research emphasized the cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverter due to its modular structure and scalability. In this topology, multiple H-bridge cells are connected in series, each supplied by an independent DC source.Themodulardesignallowseasyexpansionofvoltage levelsbyaddingadditional cells,makingtheCHB inverter particularlysuitableformedium-voltagemotordrivesand renewableenergysystems.Becauseofitsadvantagessuchas reducedharmonicdistortion,improvedefficiency,andease of control, the CHB topology has become one of the most widelystudiedmultilevelinverterconfigurationsinpower electronicsresearch(Rodriguez,LaiandPeng,2002).
6.2 Review of Harmonic Mitigation Techniques
A significant portion of multilevel inverter research has focused on harmonic mitigation techniques to improve output waveform quality.PulseWidthModulation (PWM)
strategies have been widely investigated for controlling inverter switching operations and reducing harmonic distortion. Conventional modulation methods such as sinusoidal PWM and carrier-based PWM techniques have beenextensivelystudiedduetotheirsimplicityandeaseof implementation. These techniques generate switching signals by comparing reference signals with carrier waveforms, thereby producing voltage waveforms that approximatesinusoidalsignals.Researchhasdemonstrated thatappropriateselectionofmodulationindexandswitching frequencycansignificantlyreducetotalharmonicdistortion ininverteroutputvoltage(HolmesandLipo,2003).
InadditiontoPWMmethods,selectiveharmonicelimination (SHE)techniqueshavebeenwidelyexploredforharmonic reductioninmultilevelinverters.SHEfocusesoneliminating specific lower-order harmonic components by carefully selecting switching angles within the inverter switching cycle. Researchers have developed various analytical and numericalmethodstodetermineoptimalswitchingangles that minimize harmonic distortion while maintaining the desired fundamental voltage magnitude. These methods have proven particularly effective for multilevel inverter systemswheremultipleswitchinganglesareavailablefor optimization(PatelandHoft,1973).
6.3 Review of Modified Cascaded Multilevel Inverter Topologies
Withtheincreasingdemandforefficientandcost-effective inverter systems, several researchers have proposed modifiedcascadedmultilevelinvertertopologiesaimedat reducing component count and improving system performance. Conventional cascaded H-bridge inverters requiremultipleisolatedDCsourcesandalargenumberof switchingdevices,whichincreasessystemcomplexityand cost. To address these limitations, researchers have developed modified structures that use fewer switches or shared DC sources while still generating multiple voltage levels. These reduced component designs help improve system efficiency and simplify inverter implementation in practicalapplications(GuptaandJain,2014).
Another important development in this area is the introductionofhybridmultilevelinverterconfigurationsthat combine features of different inverter topologies. Hybrid structures integrate characteristics of cascaded, diodeclamped,andflyingcapacitorinverterstoachieveimproved voltagelevelgenerationandharmonicperformance.These configurations are particularly useful in medium-voltage industrial applications where both high efficiency and reliable operation are required. Studies have shown that hybridinverterstructurescansignificantlyreduceswitching lossesandimproveoutputwaveformqualitycomparedwith conventionalinverterdesigns(Kouroetal.,2010).
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 13 Issue: 03 | Mar 2026 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
6.4 Review of Optimization-Based Harmonic Reduction Methods
Recentadvancementsincomputationaltechniqueshaveled to the development of optimization-based approaches for harmonic mitigation in multilevel inverter systems. Traditional analytical methods for determining switching angles become increasingly complex as the number of voltage levels increases. To overcome this limitation, researchers have applied artificial intelligence and metaheuristicoptimizationalgorithmstodetermineoptimal switchingparameters.TechniquessuchasParticleSwarm Optimization (PSO), Genetic Algorithms (GA), and Differential Evolution have been widely used to minimize totalharmonicdistortionininverteroutputwaveforms.
These algorithms search for optimal switching angles by iteratively evaluating candidate solutions and improving them based on predefined objective functions. The applicationofsuchoptimizationtechniqueshassignificantly improved harmonic performanceandcontrol flexibilityin multilevel inverter systems. Moreover, these methods are capableofsolvingcomplexnonlinearoptimizationproblems that cannot be easily addressed using conventional numerical techniques (Sivanagaraju and Srinivasa Rao, 2010).
6.5 Research Trends in Industrial Drive Applications
Recent research trends indicate a growing interest in integrating multilevel inverter technology with industrial motor drive systems, particularly induction motor drives used in medium-power applications. Multilevel inverters provide improved voltage waveform quality and reduced harmonic distortion, which enhance motor efficiency and reducethermalstressonmachinecomponents.Asaresult, theseinvertersystemsareincreasinglyusedinapplications such as pumps, compressors, conveyors, and high-power industrialautomationsystems.Theimprovedvoltagecontrol capabilityofmultilevelinvertersallowspreciseregulationof motor speed and torque, leading to higher operational efficiency and improved process control in industrial environments(Bose,2002).
Furthermore, researchers are focusing on improving the performanceofmedium-powerindustrialdrivesystemsby combining advanced inverter topologies with intelligent controlstrategies.Theintegrationofoptimizedmodulation techniques,reduced-switchinverterdesigns,andAI-based control algorithms is expected to enhance the efficiency, reliability,andpowerqualityofindustrialdrivesystemsin thefuture. Theseadvancements demonstratethegrowing importance of multilevel inverter technology in modern industrialpowerconversionsystems.
7. APPLICATIONS IN MEDIUM-POWERINDUSTRIAL DRIVE SYSTEMS
Multilevel inverter (MLI) technology has become increasingly important in medium-power industrial drive systems due to its ability to improve power quality, efficiency,andreliability.Industrialprocessesoftenrequire precisecontrolofmotorspeedandtorquewhilemaintaining high energy efficiency and low harmonic distortion. Traditionaltwo-levelinverterdrivescanproducesignificant harmonicdistortionandswitchinglosses,whichnegatively affectmotorperformanceandsystemreliability.Incontrast, multilevel inverters generate stepped voltage waveforms thatmorecloselyapproximatesinusoidalsignals,resulting inlowerharmonicdistortionandimprovedpowerquality. Consequently,MLIshavebeenwidelyadoptedinindustrial applications such as induction motor drives, automated manufacturing systems, and energy-intensive industrial equipment(Bose,2002).
7.1 Induction Motor Drives
Induction motors are the most widely used electrical machinesinindustrialenvironmentsbecauseoftheirsimple construction, robustness, and cost-effectiveness. These motors are commonly used in applications such as conveyors, pumps, compressors, and machine tools. The performanceofinductionmotordrivesstronglydependson thequalityofthevoltagesuppliedbytheinverter.Multilevel invertertechnologyprovidessignificantadvantagesinthis context by delivering high-quality output voltage with reduced harmonic distortion. This improvement leads to smoother motor operation, reduced electromagnetic interference, and improved efficiency in industrial motor drivesystems(Kouroetal.,2010).
7.1.1 Performance Improvement with MLIs
Theintegrationofmultilevelinverterswithinductionmotor drives significantly enhances overall system performance. BecauseMLIsgeneratemultiplevoltagelevels,theresulting outputwaveformcloselyresemblesasinusoidalwaveform, which reduces voltage stress on motor windings and minimizes torque ripple. Reduced torque ripple improves mechanical stability and decreases vibration in industrial machines. Additionally, multilevel inverters allow better utilization of the DC bus voltage and provide improved control over motor speed and torque. These advantages make MLIs particularly suitable for medium-voltage and medium-power motor drive applications where high efficiencyandprecisecontrolarerequired(Rodriguezetal., 2010).
7.1.2 Harmonic Impact on Motor Efficiency
Harmonics present in the inverter output voltage can significantlyaffecttheefficiencyandreliabilityofinduction motors.Harmoniccurrentsgeneratedbydistortedvoltage
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 13 Issue: 03 | Mar 2026 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
waveformsproduceadditionalcopperlossesandcorelosses in the motor, leading to increased heating and reduced efficiency.Furthermore,harmoniccomponentsmaycause pulsating electromagnetic torque, resulting in vibration, acousticnoise,andmechanicalstressonmotorcomponents.
Theuseofmultilevelinvertershelpsmitigatetheseeffects by producing output voltage waveforms with lower total harmonic distortion (THD). As a result, motor efficiency improves, operating temperature decreases, and overall systemreliabilityisenhanced(Akagi,2017).
7.2 Industrial Automation Systems
Modern industrial automation systems rely heavily on variable speed motor drives for controlling production processes and improving operational efficiency. These systems include automated manufacturing lines, material handlingequipment,andprecisioncontrolmechanismsthat require reliable and efficient motor drive technology. Multilevel inverter-based drive systems are increasingly used in such applications because they provide improved voltage waveform quality, lower switching losses, and enhancedpowerhandlingcapability.Thesefeaturesmake MLIshighlysuitableforautomatedindustrialenvironments where precise motion control and energy efficiency are critical(Kouroetal.,2010).
7.2.1 Conveyor Systems
Conveyor systems are widely used in industries such as mining, manufacturing, logistics, and food processing for material transportation and handling. These systems typically operate continuously and require reliable motor drivesystemscapableofhandlingvaryingloadconditions. Multilevel inverter-based drives provide smooth voltage waveforms that reduce torque pulsations and mechanical stress on conveyor motors. This leads to smoother operation,reducedmaintenancerequirements,andlonger equipmentlifespan.Additionally,theimprovedefficiencyof multilevel inverter drives helps reduce overall energy consumptioninlarge-scaleconveyorsystems(Bose,2002).
7.2.2 Pumps and Compressors
Pumpsandcompressorsareessentialcomponentsinmany industrial processes, including water supply systems, chemicalprocessingplants,andoilandgasindustries.These applications often require variable speed operation to maintainprecisecontrolofflowrateandpressure.Multilevel inverterdrivesprovideefficientandreliablespeedcontrol forpumpandcompressormotorsbydeliveringhigh-quality voltage waveforms with minimal harmonic distortion. Reducedharmoniccontentimprovesmotorefficiencyand reducesthermalstress,whichenhancesthereliabilityand operational lifespan of these critical industrial machines (Rodriguez,LaiandPeng,2002).
7.3 Renewable-Integrated Industrial Drives
Withtheincreasingemphasisonsustainableenergysystems, manyindustrialfacilitiesareintegratingrenewableenergy sourcessuchassolarphotovoltaicsystemsandwindenergy intotheirpowerinfrastructure.Multilevelinvertersplaya crucial role in enabling this integration because they can efficiently convert DC power generated by renewable sources into high-quality AC power suitable for industrial loads. In renewable-integrated industrial drive systems, multilevelinvertersnotonlyprovideharmonicreductionbut also facilitate efficient power conversion and grid synchronization. Their abilitytooperate athighervoltage levelswithreducedswitchinglossesmakesthemwellsuited forhybridenergysystemsthatcombinerenewableenergy generationwithindustrialmotordriveapplications(Kouro etal.,2010).
Furthermore, the use of modified cascaded multilevel invertertopologiesinrenewable-integratedsystemsallows better utilization of multiple DC sources, such as photovoltaicpanelsorbatterystorageunits.Thiscapability improves energy utilization efficiency and reduces dependenceonconventionalpowersources.Asindustries move toward more sustainable and energy-efficient operation, the role of multilevel inverter technology in renewable-integratedindustrialdrivesystemsisexpectedto becomeincreasinglysignificant.
8. CONCLUSION
Thisreviewpaperhaspresentedacomprehensiveoverview of harmonic mitigation-oriented design approaches for modified cascaded multilevel inverters (CMLIs) used in medium-power industrial drive systems. The study first discussedthefundamentalsofmultilevelinvertertechnology and highlighted the major inverter topologies, including Neutral Point Clamped (NPC), Flying Capacitor (FC), and CascadedH-Bridge(CHB)inverters.Amongthese,theCHB topology has received considerable attention due to its modularstructure,scalability,andsuitabilityformediumvoltageindustrialdriveapplications.However,conventional CHB inverters suffer from several limitations, such as the requirement of multiple isolated DC sources, increased componentcount,andcomplexcontrolstrategies.
To address these challenges, various modified cascaded multilevel inverter topologies have been proposed in the literature. These modified designs focus on reducing the numberofswitchesandDCsourceswhilemaintaininghighquality output voltage waveforms. In addition, the review discussed different harmonic mitigation techniques including pulse width modulation methods, selective harmonic elimination strategies, and optimization-based algorithmssuchasparticleswarmoptimizationandgenetic algorithms. These techniques play a crucial role in minimizing total harmonic distortion and improving the
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 13 Issue: 03 | Mar 2026 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
overall efficiency and reliability of inverter-based drive systems.
Furthermore, the review highlighted the application of multilevelinvertertechnologyinmedium-powerindustrial systemssuchasinductionmotordrives,conveyorsystems, pumps, compressors, and renewable-integrated industrial drives.Overall,thefindingsindicatethatmodifiedcascaded multilevel inverter structures combined with advanced control and optimization techniques offer significant potential for improving power quality and operational efficiencyinmodernindustrialdrivesystems.
8.1.Limitations
of the Review
Althoughthisreviewprovidesabroadoverviewofharmonic mitigation-oriented modified cascaded multilevel inverter designs,severallimitationsshouldbeacknowledged.First, the review primarily focuses on widely studied inverter topologiesandharmonicmitigationstrategies reported in existingliterature,andthereforemaynotincludeallrecently proposed inverter configurations or emerging control techniques. Second, the discussion mainly emphasizes theoreticalconceptsandcomparativeanalysis ratherthan detailed experimental validation or hardware implementation results. Additionally, variations in system parameters, switching strategies, and application-specific requirements across different studies make direct performancecomparisonchallenging.Futurereviewsmay incorporate a larger dataset of experimental studies and real-time industrial implementations to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of multilevel inverter performanceinpracticalapplications.
REFERENCES
1. Akagi, H. (2017) Instantaneous Power Theory and ApplicationstoPowerConditioning.2ndedn.Hoboken, NJ:Wiley-IEEEPress.
2. Arrillaga, J. and Watson, N.R. (2003) Power System Harmonics.2ndedn.Chichester:JohnWiley&Sons.
3. Bose, B.K. (2002) Modern Power Electronics and AC Drives.UpperSaddleRiver,NJ:PrenticeHall.
4. Goldberg, D.E. (1989) Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5. Gupta, K.K. and Jain, S. (2014) ‘A novel multilevel inverter topology with reduced number of switches’, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 29(11), pp. 5796–5805.
6. Holmes, D.G. and Lipo, T.A. (2003) Pulse Width Modulation for Power Converters: Principles and Practice.Hoboken,NJ:IEEEPress/JohnWiley&Sons.
7. Kouro, S., Malinowski, M., Gopakumar, K., Pou, J., Franquelo, L.G., Wu, B., Rodriguez, J., Pérez, M.A. and Leon, J.I. (2010) ‘Recent advances and industrial applications of multilevel converters’, IEEE TransactionsonIndustrialElectronics,57(8),pp.2553–2580.
8. Lezana, P. and Rodriguez, J. (2009) ‘Mixed multilevel inverter topologies’, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics,56(2),pp.531–541.
9. Malinowski,M.,Gopakumar,K.andRodriguez,J.(2010) ‘A survey on cascaded multilevel inverters’, IEEE TransactionsonIndustrialElectronics,57(7),pp.2197–2206.
10. Nabae, A., Takahashi, I. and Akagi, H. (1981) ‘A new neutral-point-clamped PWM inverter’, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, IA-17(5), pp. 518–523.
11. Patel,H.S.andHoft,R.G.(1973)‘Generalizedtechniques ofharmoniceliminationandvoltagecontrolinthyristor inverters’,IEEETransactionsonIndustryApplications, IA-9(3),pp.310–317.
12. Peng, F.Z. (2001) ‘A generalized multilevel inverter topologywithselfvoltagebalancing’,IEEETransactions onIndustryApplications,37(2),pp.611–618.
13. Rodriguez,J.,Lai,J.S.andPeng,F.Z.(2002)‘Multilevel inverters: A survey of topologies, controls, and applications’, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics,49(4),pp.724–738.
14. Rodriguez,J.,Bernet,S.,Wu,B.,Pontt,J.O.andKouro,S. (2010)‘Multilevelvoltage-source-convertertopologies for industrial medium-voltage drives’, IEEE TransactionsonIndustrialElectronics,57(8),pp.2930–2945.
15. Saba,M.,Tariq,M.andIqbal,A.(2018)‘Reducedswitch multilevel inverter topologies for renewable energy applications’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,82,pp.2921–2935.
16. Sivanagaraju, S. and Srinivasa Rao, G. (2010) Power System Operation and Control. New Delhi: Pearson Education.
17. McMahan,H.B.,Moore,E.,Ramage,D.,Hampson,S.,& Aguera-y-Arcas, B. (2017). Communication-Efficient Learning ofDeepNetworks from Decentralized Data. Proceedings of the International Conference on ArtificialIntelligenceandStatistics(AISTATS).
18. Bonawitz, K., Ivanov, V., Kreuter, B., et al. (2017). Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 13 Issue: 03 | Mar 2026 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
Machine Learning. ACM SIGSAC Conference on ComputerandCommunicationsSecurity.
19. Li, T., Sahu, A. K., Zaheer, M., et al. (2020). Federated OptimizationinHeterogeneousNetworks.Proceedings ofMachineLearningandSystems.
20. Karimireddy, S. P., Kale, S., Mohri, M., et al. (2020). SCAFFOLD: Stochastic Controlled Averaging for Federated Learning. International Conference on MachineLearning(ICML).
21. Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., et al. (2021). Advancesand OpenProblemsinFederatedLearning. FoundationsandTrendsinMachineLearning.
22. Yang,Q.,Liu,Y.,Chen,T.,&Tong,Y.(2019).Federated Machine Learning: Concept and Applications. ACM TransactionsonIntelligentSystemsandTechnology.
23. Sheller, M. J., Edwards, B., Reina, G. A., et al. (2020). Federated Learning in Medicine: Facilitating MultiInstitutional Collaborations Without Sharing Patient Data.ScientificReports.
24. Rieke,N.,Hancox,J.,Li,W.,etal.(2020).TheFutureof Digital Health with Federated Learning. npj Digital Medicine.
25. Pati,S., Baid,U.,Edwards, B.,et al.(2022).Federated LearningEnablesBigData forRareCancerBoundary Detection.NatureCommunications.
26. Li,X.,Jiang,M.,Zhang,X.,Kamp,M.,&Dou,Q.(2021). FedBN: Federated Learning on Non-IID Features via LocalBatchNormalization.InternationalConferenceon LearningRepresentations(ICLR).
27. Li, Q., Wen, Z., Wu, Z., et al. (2020). A Survey on FederatedLearningSystems:Vision,HypeandReality. arXivpreprint.
28. Xu, J.,Glicksberg, B. S., Su,C.,et al.(2021). Federated Learning for Healthcare Informatics. Journal of HealthcareInformaticsResearch.
29. Brisimi,T.S.,Chen,R.,Mela,T.,etal.(2018).Federated Learning of Predictive Models from Federated Electronic Health Records. International Journal of MedicalInformatics.
30. Kaissis, G., Makowski, M., Rückert, D., & Braren, R. (2020). Secure, Privacy-Preserving and Federated MachineLearninginMedicalImaging.NatureMachine Intelligence.
31. Chen,M.,Sui,Y.,&Ding,Y.(2022).DifferentialPrivacy inFederatedLearning:ASurvey.IEEECommunications Surveys&Tutorials.
32. Rahman,M.A.,Hossain,M.S.,Islam,M.S.,etal.(2020). Blockchain-Assisted Federated Learning for Secure SmartHealthcareSystems.IEEEAccess.
33. Aouedi, O., Sacco, A., Piamrat, K., & Marchetto, G. (2022).HandlingPrivacy-SensitiveMedicalDatawith FederatedLearning:ChallengesandFutureDirections. IEEEJournalofBiomedicalandHealthInformatics.
34. Ali, M., Naeem, F., Tariq, M., & Kaddoum, G. (2022). FederatedLearningforPrivacyPreservationinSmart Healthcare Systems: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE JournalofBiomedicalandHealthInformatics.
35. Akhmetov, A., Latif, Z., Tyler, B., & Yazici, A. (2025). EnhancingHealthcareDataPrivacyandInteroperability withFederatedLearning.PeerJComputerScience.
36. Mir,B.A.,Abbas,S.R.,&Lee,S.W.(2026).Federated LearninginHealthcareEthics:ASystematicReviewof Privacy-Preserving and Equitable Medical AI. HealthcareJournal.
37. Pati, S., Kumar, S., Varma, A., et al. (2024). Privacy Preservation for Federated Learning in Health Care. Patterns.
38. Ge, S., Wu, F., Wu, C., et al. (2020). FedNER: PrivacyPreserving Medical Named Entity Recognition with FederatedLearning.arXivpreprint.
39. Nampalle,K.B.,Singh,P.,Narayan,U.V.,&Raman,B. (2023).DifferentialPrivacyinFederatedLearningfor MedicalImageClassification.arXivpreprint.
40. HajFares,M.,&Saad,A.M.(2024).FederatedLearning with Differential Privacy and Secure Aggregation for MedicalImaging.arXivpreprint.
41. Akhmetov, A., Latif, Z., Tyler, B., & Yazici, A. (2025). EnhancingHealthcareDataPrivacyandInteroperability withFederatedLearning.PeerJComputerScience.
2026, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 8.315 | ISO 9001:2008