International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)
e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 12 Issue: 03 | Mar 2025
p-ISSN: 2395-0072
www.irjet.net
A Comparative Study on High-Rise building with and without shear wall using Revit Structural and Autodesk Robot Structural Software Sudarshan Suryanarayan1, Dinesh M Pandit2 1PG M.Tech Student Department Of Civil Engineering,(CSMSS) Chh.Shahu College Of Engg. Chh. Sambhaji Nagar
2Assistant Professor, Department Of Civil Engineering,(CSMSS) Chh. Shahu College of Engg. Chh. Sambhaji Ngar ---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract - New software is on the market every day. Many
4) Advantage and disadvantage in multi-Storey Building Design, Using Two software with the help of plug-in software.
structural design software offers in civil engineering. This study uses the new Autodesk Robot structure and Revit Structures -Software to analyze G+20 buildings with or without shear walls. This research provides the use and functionality of the above software. This examines advantages and disadvantages, and uses. The growing global population and urbanization will significantly increase the need for skyscrapers. And the safety of these buildings must be considered. The structure of cultivation can be actively broken due to wind and earthquake aspects. Security against lateral forces can be achieved by implementing shear walls on the building. Modeling and comparative studies on the stiffness, stiffness and soil shift of the basic scissors of the two models will be carried out in this project using Revit structure and robotic structure software.
2. Modeling This study modeled a G+20-storey frame structure with a regular plan. The building is fixed to the base and the floor is thought to function as a hard diaphragm. The floor surface of the structure is 12.80 x 18.82 m. Model 1:- With Shear Wall Model 2:- With-Out Shear Wall Table -1: Building Data Sr.No
Content
Value
Key Words: Autodesk Robot Structural, Revit Structural, Auto-CAD, Shear Wall,
1
Plan
2
No. Of Storeys
G+20
1.INTRODUCTION
3
Storey Height
3Meter
4
Column Size
800X800 & 600X600(mm)
5
Beam Size
300x600 & 300X300(mm)
6
Grade Of Concrete
M-35
7
Grade Of Steel
Fe-500
8
Wall Thickness
0.23m
9
Slab Thickness
0.15m
10
Live Load At Typical Floor
3KN/M2
11
Live Load At Terrase
1.5KN/M2
1) To Explore New Software Robot Structure and Revit Structure.
12
Floor Finish Load
1KN/M2
13
Dead Load Of Wall
11.04KN/M2
2) To understand the Behaviour of (G+20) Building With and With-Out shear wall against seismic loading
14
Dead Load
3KN/M2
15
Soil Type
II
3) Comparison of Maximum Storey Axial Force, Maximum Storey Moment, storey drift, storey displacement and storey stiffness for buildings with and with-out shear wall.
16
Damping Ratio
5%
17
Impcat Factor
1.5
ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal
|
Shear walls or structural walls are essential lateral load resistance systems based on high increase for smooth function. They provide the building with the right stiffness and stiffness, which reduces the lightness of failure. Positioning shear walls in advantageous positions can serve as an efficient and effective way to improve the earthquake response of a building. In this paper, we present two models Seismic Zone-II of the G+20 classified framed buildings in the analysis model of the zone. Shear wall on the sides and buoyancy areas. The analysis results of basic shear, floor drift, strong shifting and stiffness of the store give you an idea and important it is to have shear walls in an RCC building, and the optimal location that can be placed.
1.1 Objective of Study
© 2025, IRJET
|
Impact Factor value: 8.315
|
12.80X 18.820
Page 1183