2 minute read
D. Comparison Report For Compressive Stress
VI. CONCLUSIONS
1) For the above reason shear wall was provided at different locations in a building i.e. at corners, along the periphery of building, in the middle as CASE I, II and III respectively.
Advertisement
2) All the load combinations, the combination of 1.5 (DL+EQ) is discovered to be more critical combination for the models.
3) The lateral deflection for building with CASE I, shear wall is reduced as in comparison to all models. Hence, it may be stated that building with CASE-I shear wall is much more efficient than all other models with shear wall.
4) Shear wall is placed at outer edge parallel to X and Z direction of the building significantly reduces displacement
5) It is been concluded that the displacement in One-Side Swimming Pool Building is approximately 30% less than CenterPosition Swimming Pool Building whereas 36% less than Two-Side Swimming Pool Building & 40% less than Three-Side Swimming Pool Building. It concludes that as the position of swimming pool changes, there is change in displacement. Oneside Swimming pool Building shows better results whereas the other Case Model shows less variation when compared with each other.
6) After all analysis, We can say that there is a much variation in results as the positon of swimming pool in elevation plays an important role in the designing of the building and here it’s been concluded that the single side positon pool comprises the best position for the regular buildings.
References
[1] Chokshi Shreya H., Dalal S.P. , “Performance of an RCC Frame Building Subjected To Hydrodynamic Force At Each Floor Level - A Case Study”, IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology , eISSN: 2319-1163, Volume: 04, Issue: 06 June-2015.
[2] Bureau of Indian Standards: IS-1893, part 1 (2002), “Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures: Part 1 General provisions and Buildings”, New Delhi, India.
[3] Scientific & Engineering Research, ISSN 2229-5518, Volume 7, Issue 10, October-2016.
[4] Davidson Shilpa Sara, Kumar Aswathy S , “Study on the Effect of Swimming Pool as Tuned Mass Damper”, International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) ISSN: 2278-0181, Volume 6, Issue 06 , Special Issue – 2018.
[5] Pawar Jagruti Vasant, Prof. Gore N. G., “Systematical Approach for Optimization of Swimming Pool”, International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology, ISSN: 2277-9655, 6(4): April, 2016.
[6] Jadhav Amol, Prof. Gore N. G., “Cost Optimization of Roof Top Swimming Pool”, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), eISSN: 2395 -0056, Volume: 03 Issue: 01, Jan-2016.
[7] IS: 875 (Part I) – 1987, “Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other than Earthquake) For Buildings and Structures”, Part 1 Dead Loads - Unit Weights Of Building Materials And Stored Materials, Second Revision, September 2003.
[8] Shrikhande Manish, Agrawal Pankaj (2010).” Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures.” PH I Learning Private Limited New Delhi.
[9] Paulay,T., and Priestley,M.J.N., (1992), “Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings,” John Wiley & Sons, USA.
[10] Esmaili O. and Epackachi S. “Study of structural RC shears wall system in a 56-story RC tall building”. The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, 2008.
