8
V
http://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2020.5112
May 2020
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET) ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.429 Volume 8 Issue V May 2020- Available at www.ijraset.com
Comparative Seismic Behaviour Study of Special Shaped Column Framed Reinforced Structure Dhrupal S. Patel1, Arjun M. Butala2 1
M.Tech Student, 2Assistant Professor, CED, U.V Patel College of Engineering, Ganpat University, Gujarat
Abstract: The objective of this study is in order to improve the performance of RCC framed Structure with rectangular columns with Different Shaped (Circular, Rectangle, T-Shape & I-Shape) Column under the Lateral Load Condition. G+9, 30m height of building analysed with different shape of column with equivalent cross section area of different shaped column. Building analysed using Response spectrum method under the Earthquake Zone IV (As per Indian Standard). The maximum story drift, Base shear & other parameter are considered in this paper. Analysis & Calculation done by using STAAD Pro V8i software. The results indicate the comparative Study and analysis of regular shaped and other several shaped column cross sections. Keywords: Earthquake, Different Shape Column, Response Spectrum Analysis, Story Drift, Base Shear, Staad Pro. I. INTRODUCTION Structural Analysis & Design is Art and Science of understanding the behaviour of structural member subjected to loads and designing them with safety & serviceability. The present work will be dealing with such a study of structural members made of RCC as it is widely used because of its compliance. Building constructed by various Structural Component like Slab, Beam, Column & Footing. Self-Weight of component as well as dead load & live load of building transferred from slab to beam and beam to column and Column to footing. Column play very important role in buildings because total Gravity load transfer through column. Different Shapes of Column are used in the construction such as Square Column, Rectangular column, Circular Column, T-Shaped Column& I-Shaped Column. Increase in height of building, simultaneously lateral load also increase. While considering later load building, Column behave different under dynamic & Static loading Conditions. The dynamic loading consideration is must require when seismic activity high. II. GEOMETRY AND DESCRIPTION Geometry modelling done in Staad Pro software and following Shape of Column, Size of Column & loading parameter assigned to model as below.
Fig. 1 Plan view & Elevation view of model
Fig. 2 Circular, Square type Shape & Size of Column[1]
ŠIJRASET: All Rights are Reserved
714
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET) ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.429 Volume 8 Issue V May 2020- Available at www.ijraset.com
Fig. 3 Rectangle-A, Rectangle-B, rectangle-C type Shape & Size of Column[1]
Fig. 4 “T” Shape-A, “T” Shape-B, “T” Shape-C type Shape & Size of Column[1]
Fig. 5 “I” Shape-A, “I” Shape-B, “I” Shape-C type Shape & Size of Column[1] TABLE I Geometry and Description Description & Parameter Value Total height of Building 33
Sr. No 1 2
Height of each story
3
3
Type of Structure
RC Framed
4
Number of bay in X & ZDirection
Unit Meters Meters
5
Nos.
5
Beam Size
300 x 600
mm
6
Wall load on Beam
14.5
kN / m
7
Parapet load on Beam
5
kN / m
8
Slab Dead Load
4.75
kN / m
9
Slab Live Load
3
kN / m
10
Seismic Zone
IV
11
Period in X & Z Direction
0.604
12
Support as base
Fix
13
Reinforcement Grade
Fe500
14
Concrete Grade
M25
15
Analysis Standard
Indian Standards
©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved
Seconds
715
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET) ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.429 Volume 8 Issue V May 2020- Available at www.ijraset.com III. RESULT OF STRUCTURAL RESPONSE OF R.C. FRAME BUILDING A. Story Drift Maximum Story Drift of the frame structure with specially shaped column under response spectrum analysis are shown.
Fig. 6 Circular & Square Column Story Drift in X-Direction & Z-Direction
Fig. 7 Rectangle-A & Rectangle-B Column Story Drift in X-Direction & Z-Direction
Fig. 8 Rectangle-C & “I-Shape”-A Column Story Drift in X-Direction & Z-Direction
©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved
716
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET) ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.429 Volume 8 Issue V May 2020- Available at www.ijraset.com
Fig. 9 “I-Shape”-B & “I-Shape”-C Column Story Drift in X-Direction & Z-Direction
Fig. 10 “T-Shape”-A & “T-Shape”-B Column Story Drift in X-Direction & Z-Direction
Fig. 11 “T-Shape”-C Column Story Drift in X-Direction & Z-Direction
©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved
717
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET) ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.429 Volume 8 Issue V May 2020- Available at www.ijraset.com
Fig. 12 Story Drift of Different shaped column in X-Direction
Fig. 13 Story Drift of Different shaped column in Z-Direction Following as above graph representing the different shape of column story drift in X-Direction & Z-Direction. B. Base Shear Reaction It is the total Design Lateral force at the base of structure. Variation of base shear in X-Direction & Y-Direction has been carried out in this research work as beloved base shear mention value.
Fig. 14 Base Shear (kN) in X-Direction
ŠIJRASET: All Rights are Reserved
718
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET) ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.429 Volume 8 Issue V May 2020- Available at www.ijraset.com
Fig. 15 Base Shear (kN) in Z-Direction IV. CONCLUSION In the present study analysis of G+9, 33 meters height framed structure is carried out with various shape of column. Based on analysis and result for all models considered, following conclusion are drawn. A. Base Shear remain same for all type of column but Circular column have least base shear among all type of Column in both XDirection & Z-Direction. B. T Shape-B type column have maximum Story drift in X-Direction but in Z-direction maximum Storey drift shown in Rectangle-C type column. C. Rectangle-C type column have minimum Story drift in X-Direction up to 30 meters. But in Z-direction minimum Storey drift shown in T Shape-B type column up to 30 meters. D. Obstruction will be made by the offset of columns in case of specially shaped column buildings. REFERENCES [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
Dhrupal S. Patel, Arjun M. Butala, “Seismic Response Study of Different Shaped Column R.C. Frame Building”, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), Volume 7, Issue 5, e-ISSN: 2395 -0056, p-ISSN: 2395-0072, May -2020 Pu Yang, Hongxing Liu, Zongming Huang, “A Comparison of Seismic Behaviour between specially shaped column Frame structure And Rectangular column Frame structures”, The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China Jian Tang, Lang Wu, “Study on Seismic Performance of Irregular RC Frame with Specially Shaped Columns”, Applied Mechanics and Materials, ISSN: 16627482, Vols. 580-583, PP 1712-1717 Shital A. Navghare, Amey Khedikar, “Analysis of RCC Framed Structure for Column with Modelling Irregularities”, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 6, Special Issue 11, ISSN(Online): 2319-8753, May 2017 Aditya N. Gumble, Dr. Prakash S. Pajgade, “Comparison between Specially shaped columns and Rectangular columns in R.C. Structure”, International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development, Volume 2,Issue 5, e-ISSN(O): 2348-4470, May -2015 Shivaranjitha T H , Naveen Kumar S, “Comparative Study of Y-Shaped Columns With Conventional Rectangular Shaped Columns”, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), Volume 4, Issue 6, e-ISSN: 2395 -0056, June -2017
©IJRASET: All Rights are Reserved
719