Skip to main content

HSS What's the Diagnosis Case 84

Page 1

What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

1


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

2


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

3


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

4


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

5


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

6


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

7


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

8


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

9


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

10


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

11


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

12


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

13


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

14


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

15


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

16


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

17


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

18


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

19


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

20


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

21


Findings Multiple planes of imaging demonstrate two tendons at the expected location of the distal biceps tendon. The more medial tendon demonstrates a low grade injury/strain with otherwise continuity to the radial tuberosity. The more lateral tendon demonstrates complete disruption with retraction of approximately 2.5cm from the radial tuberosity. A marked amount of edema is seen in the adjacent soft tissues.

What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

22


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

23


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

24


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

25


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

26


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

27


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

28


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

29


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

30


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

31


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

32


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

33


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

34


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

35


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

36


Diagnosis: Complete disruption of one tendon in the setting of a bifurcated/bifid distal biceps tendon Disruption of the distal biceps tendon is much less common than at the proximal attachment and tends to occur in middle aged men, typically older than 40. The short and long heads of the biceps yield tendons at approximately 7cm proximal to the radial tuberosity attachment site. There is a vast variation in the degree of intertwining or decussation between the two tendons. As in this case, at times there is a persistent bifurcated or bifid architecture of the tendons with two separate tendons extending to the radial tuberosity. When two tendons are present, the short head of the biceps is the more medial of the tendons and has a more distal insertion on the radial tuberostiy. The long head of the biceps is the more lateral tendon and inserts more proximally. In the setting of a selective disruption of one of the tendons, by in large it is the short head but in this example it is the more lateral tendon or long head tendon that is disrupted. However, there has been a strain of the short head seen best on the axial IR images and hence this is not completely, an isolated or selective injury. The importance of these findings is to be aware that injury can have still been sustained even if a tendon attachment is present at the radial tuberosity and surgery may still be necessary for the selective disruption.

What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

37


What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

38


References Bifid insertion of the distal biceps brachii tendon with isolated rupture: magnetic resonance findings. Koulouris G, Malone W, Omar IM, Gopez AG, Wright W, Kavanagh EC. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Nov-Dec;18(6). http://radsource.us/pathology-of-the-long-head-of-the-biceps-tendon/

What’s the Diagnosis – Case 84

39


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
HSS What's the Diagnosis Case 84 by Hospital for Special Surgery - Issuu