DOMINANCE OF FUMONISINS AND AFLATOXINS IN AQUA FEED SAMPLES FROM 10 COUNTRIES
Jog Raj*, Hunor Farkaš, Nemanja Todorovic, Zdenka Jakovčević, Robert Čepela and Marko Vasiljević PATENT CO, DOO., Mišićevo, Serbia *Corresponding author: jog.raj@patent-co.com
1
The most recent data estimates that
Now, in most circumstances,
aquatic animals (capture fisheries and
mycotoxins occur in many, if
aquaculture taken together) currently
not all, feed raw materials of
contribute approximately 40% of the
plant origin if the environmental
global animal protein production, up
conditions are favorable.
from about 25% in the early 2000s.
40% of the global animal protein production
To some extent, the presence of mycotoxin-producing fungi is less frequent in feed ingredients coming from animals (marine
To meet this target the demand for
fishmeal and fish oil), but
aquatic feed is also increasing and
it is not unheard of.
efforts to minimize the use of marine fish-based oils and protein, multiple alternatives are being considered, for example other (even aquaculture) fish offal and slaughter or farming by-products, including animal manure. With today’s globalization of trade However, the focus is mainly on
and the use of feed raw materials
plant-based sources of protein and
from all over the world, it is crucial to
oil such as corn, soybeans, various
screen for contaminated ingredients
post-processing by-products such
when preparing the commercial
as oil-pressed cakes and meals,
feed for aquaculture species.
bioethanol by-products, silage (from plants or animals), and many more.
2
Surveillance is routinely carried out in larger companies, but it remains a problem for small feed mills and use of contaminated feeds in farms is a risk.
In this survey, more than
+200
samples were 200 samples were analysed analysed for multiple for multiple mycotoxins mycotoxins using LC-MS/MS triple
quadrupole (Agilent 6460 series) based multi-mycotoxin method for quantification of all mycotoxins present. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to screen aqua feed samples received from different countries between January and November 2021 to determine their level of contamination with mycotoxins:
These included Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), B2, G1 and G2, Ochratoxin A (OTA), Zearalenone (ZEN), Deoxynivalenol (DON), Fumonisin B1 and B2 (FB1 and FB2), T-2 and HT-2 toxins, all regulated in the EU in
Serbia Spain
feed by EU Directives 2002/32/EC, 2006/576/EC, and 2013/165/EU.
Vietnam Turkey Egypt Senegal
The results of this survey per country are presented as below.
Philippines Uganda
Results of mycotoxin levels for each country
Kenya Thailand
Results of mycotoxins in aqua feed for all 10 countries Effects of mycotoxins on aquaculture species (fish and shrimp) Conclusions
3
Results of mycotoxin levels for each country SERBIA
In 2021, 29% of the aqua feed samples
DON with an average of 128 ppb, FB1 with
from Serbia were not contaminated with
86 ppb and FB2 with an average of 95 ppb
mycotoxins. 14% of the samples were
were detected in aqua feed samples.
contaminated with one mycotoxin and 57% samples were found to contain more than 1 mycotoxin (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Number of mycotoxins per sample in aqua feed from Serbia.
FB1 was detected in 57% of the samples followed by DON in 29 % and then FB2 in 14 % of aqua feed samples from different regions of Serbia (Table 1).
14 Table 1. Mycotoxin contamination levels (ppb) in aqua feed samples from Serbia in 2021.
57
29
1 mycotoxin
DON
FB1
FB2
Average (ppb)
128
86
95
Maximum of positives (ppb)
185
147
95
Minimum (ppb)
72
47
95
% of positives
29
57
14
> 1 mycotoxin < LOQ
4
SPAIN
In 2021, 46 % of the aqua feed samples
DON with an average of 93 ppb, FB1 with
from Spain were not contaminated
103, FB2 with 89 ppb, ZEN with 75 ppb,
with mycotoxins whereas 7% had one
and AFB1 with an average of 0.6 ppb were
mycotoxin and 47% samples were found
detected in aqua feed samples from Spain.
to contain more than 1 mycotoxin (Figure
2). So, in net 54% of aquafeed samples were contaminated with mycotoxins. FB1 and ZEN were detected in 47% of the samples followed by
Figure 2. Number of mycotoxins per sample in aqua feed from Spain.
AFB1 in 27 % and DON in 13 % of aqua feed samples from different regions of Spain (Table 2).
Table 2. Mycotoxin contamination levels (ppb) in aqua feed samples from Spain in 2021.
7
AFB1
ZEN
DON
FB1
FB2
Average (ppb)
0.6
75
93
103
89
Maximum of positives (ppb)
1.0
134
102
186
127
Minimum (ppb)
0.4
29
84
62
53
% of positives
27
47
13
47
47
46
47
1 mycotoxin > 1 mycotoxin < LOQ
5
THAILAND
In 2021, 63% of the aqua feed samples
DON with an average of 135 ppb, FB1 with
from Thailand were not contaminated
143, FB2 with 245 ppb, and AFB1 with an
with mycotoxins whereas 23% had one
average of 0.7 ppb were detected in aqua
mycotoxin and 14% samples were found
feed samples from Thailand in 2021.
to contain more than 1 mycotoxin (Figure
3). So, in net 37% of aquafeed samples were contaminated with mycotoxins.
FB1 and AFB1 were detected in 11% of the samples whereas DON
Figure 3. Number of mycotoxins per sample in aqua feed from Thailand.
was detected in 17% and FB2 in 6% samples from different regions of Thailand (Table 3).
Table 3. Mycotoxin contamination levels (ppb) in aqua feed samples from Thailand in 2021.
14
AFB1
DON
FB1
FB2
Average (ppb)
0.7
135
143
245
Maximum of positives (ppb)
1.1
305
387
247
Minimum (ppb)
0.4
64
44
243
% of positives
11
17
11
6
23
63
1 mycotoxin > 1 mycotoxin < LOQ
6
VIETNAM
In 2021, 36% of the aqua feed samples
DON with an average of 527 ppb, FB1
from Vietnam were not contaminated
with 317, FB2 with 124 ppb, ZEN with
with mycotoxins, whereas 21% had one
58 ppb and AFB1 with an average of
mycotoxin and 43% samples were found
0.6 ppb were detected in aqua feed
to contain more than 1 mycotoxin (Figure
samples from Vietnam in 2021.
4). So, in net 64% of aquafeed samples were contaminated with mycotoxins. FB1 and DON were detected in 36% of the samples whereas
Figure 4. Number of mycotoxins per sample in aqua feed from Vietnam.
FB1 was detected in 36% and AFB1 was detected in 18% of the samples from Vietnam (Table 4).
43
36
21
Table 4. Mycotoxin contamination levels (ppb) in aqua feed samples from Vietnam in 2021. AFB1
ZEN
DON
FB1
FB2
Average (ppb)
0.6
58
527
317
124
Maximum of positives (ppb)
1.4
209
1556
2490
673
Minimum (ppb)
0.4
18
73
55
45
% of positives
18
58
36
36
33
1 mycotoxin > 1 mycotoxin < LOQ
7
TURKEY
In 2021, 29% of the aqua feed samples
FB1 with an average of 124 ppb, FB2
from Turkey were not contaminated
with 154 ppb, and AFB1 with an average
with mycotoxins whereas 4% had one
of 1.8 ppb were detected in aqua feed
mycotoxin and 67% samples were found
samples from Turkey in 2021.
to contain more than 1 mycotoxin (Figure
5). So, in net 71% of aquafeed samples were contaminated with mycotoxins. FB1 was detected in 67% of samples and AFB1 was detected in 63% of
Figure 5. Number of mycotoxins per sample in aqua feed from Turkey.
the samples from Turkey (Table 5).
Table 5. Mycotoxin contamination levels (ppb) in aqua feed samples from Turkey in 2021.
4 29 67
AFB1
FB1
FB2
Average (ppb)
1.8
124
154
Maximum of positives (ppb)
6.9
336
535
Minimum (ppb)
0.4
46
49
% of positives
63
67
63
1 mycotoxin > 1 mycotoxin < LOQ
8
KENYA
UGANDA
In 2021, all the aqua feed samples
In 2021, all the aqua feed samples
from Kenya were contaminated
from Uganda were contaminated
with more than one mycotoxin.
with more than one mycotoxin.
FB1 with an average of 264, FB2 with
FB1 with an average of 370 ppb, FB2
76 ppb and AFB1 with an average of
with 185 ppb and AFB1 with an average
31.7 ppb were detected in aqua feed
of 133 ppb were detected in aqua feed
samples from Kenya in 2021.
samples from Uganda in 2021.
FB1, FB2 and AFB1 were detected in all
FB1, FB2 and AFB1 were detected in
(100%) samples from Kenya (Table 6).
all (100%) the samples (Table 7).
Table 6. Mycotoxin contamination levels (ppb) in aqua feed samples from Kenya in 2021.
Table 7. NMycotoxin contamination levels (ppb) in aqua feed samples from Uganda in 2021.
Average (ppb)
AFB1
FB1
FB2
32.4
265
76
AFB1
FB1
FB2
Average (ppb)
133
370
185
252
391
201
Maximum of positives (ppb)
41.7
421
120
Maximum of positives (ppb)
Minimum (ppb)
31.7
207
69
Minimum (ppb)
14
349
169
% of positives
100
100
100
% of positives
100
100
100
9
PHILIPPINES
EGYPT
In 2021, all the aqua feed samples
In 2021, all the aqua feed samples
from Philippines were contaminated
from Egypt were contaminated with
with one mycotoxin (AFB1).
more than one mycotoxin. AFB1 with average of 0.8 ppb, ZEN with 78 ppb, DON with 159 ppb, FB1 with 78 ppb and
AFB1 with average of 4 ppb was detected in 100 % of aqua feed samples tested
FB2 with an average of 84 ppb were detected in aqua feed samples from Egypt (Tabla 9).
from Philippines in 2021 (Table 8).
FB1 was the most predominant mycotoxin detected in 100% aqua feed samples
Table 8. Mycotoxin contamination levels (ppb) in aqua feed samples from Philippines in 2021.
from Egypt, followed by AFB1 in 69%, DON in 62% and ZEN that was detected in 54% samples (Table 9).
AFB1 Average (ppb)
4
Maximum of positives (ppb)
7
Minimum (ppb)
2
% of positives
100
Table 9. Mycotoxin contamination levels (ppb) in aqua feed samples from Egypt in 2021.
AFB1
ZEN
DON
FB1
FB2
Average (ppb)
0.8
78
159
78
84
Maximum of positives (ppb)
1.7
151
237
162
147
Minimum (ppb)
0.5
25
67
46
48
% of positives
69
54
62
100
54
10
SENEGAL
In 2021, 29% aquafeed samples from Senegal
AFB1 with average of 1.6 ppb, ZEN
were not contaminated with mycotoxins
with 120 ppb, DON with 78 ppb, FB1
whereas 71% samples were contaminated
with 55 ppb and FB2 with an average
with more than one mycotoxin (Figure 6).
of 116 ppb were detected in aqua feed samples from Senegal (Tabla 10).
Figure 6. Number of mycotoxins per sample in aqua feed from Senegal. FB1 was the most predominant mycotoxin as it was detected in 71% aqua feed samples from
0
Senegal, followed by ZEN and FB1 in 43% samples and then DON in 29% samples (Tabla 10).
29 71
1 mycotoxin > 1 mycotoxin
Table 10. Mycotoxin contamination levels (ppb) in aqua feed samples from Senegal in 2021. AFB1
ZEN
DON
FB1
FB2
Average (ppb)
1.6
120
78
55
116
Maximum of positives (ppb)
2.3
187
88
74
159
Minimum (ppb)
0.8
52
68
40
83
% of positives
71
43
29
43
43
< LOQ
11
Results of mycotoxins in aqua feed for all 10 countries Summary of the mycotoxins in aqua feed survey results from Serbia, Spain, Vietnam, Turkey, Egypt, Senegal, Philippines, Uganda, Kenya and Thailand received between January and November 2021
In 2021, 36% of the aqua feed samples received from Serbia, Spain, Vietnam, Turkey, Egypt, Senegal, Philippines, Uganda, Kenya and Thailand between January and November 2021 were not contaminated
DON with an average of 265 ppb, ZEN with 82 ppb, AFB1 with 6 ppb, FB1 with 181 ppb, FB2 with 134 ppb and OTA with an average of 38 ppb were detected in 2021 in aqua feed received from these 10 countries.
with mycotoxins whereas 64% samples were found to contain more one or more than one mycotoxin (Figure 7). FB1 was the most predominant This data showed cooccurrence of
mycotoxin as it was detected in 47%
mycotoxins in 50% of aqua feed
of the tested samples followed by
samples from Serbia, Spain, Vietnam,
AFB1 in 36%, ZEN in 29% and DON in
Turkey, Egypt, Senegal, Philippines,
26 % of aqua feed samples (Table 11).
Uganda, Kenya and Thailand (Figure 7).
Figure 7. Number of mycotoxins per sample in aqua feed from Serbia, Spain, Vietnam, Turkey, Egypt, Senegal, Philippines, Uganda, Kenya and Thailand recieved between January and November 2021.
14 1 mycotoxin
36
50
> 1 mycotoxin < LOQ
Table 11. Mycotoxin contamination levels (ppb) in aqua feed samples from Serbia, Spain, Vietnam, Turkey, Egypt, Senegal, Philippines, Uganda, Kenya and Thailand received between January and November 2021.
AFB1
OTA
ZEN
DON
FB1
FB2
Average (ppb)
6
38
82
265
181
134
Maximum of positives (ppb)
252
80
364
1556
2490
673
Minimum (ppb)
0.4
2
18
64
40
45
% of positives
36
4
29
26
47
39
12
Effects of mycotoxins on aquaculture species Literature has shown that, while aflatoxins in recent decades have been the “most famous” of all the mycotoxins, it should be kept in mind that there are over a hundred different mycotoxins and many of them are known to cause human health problems for centuries (e.g., ergotism) and still are causing animal health problems. A summary of different effects of mycotoxins on aquatic animals is shown in Figure 8. The toxic effects of different mycotoxin groups are similar in terrestrial and aquatic animals.
For example, aflatoxins cause liver damage and ochratoxins are toxic for kidneys.
Figure 8. Effects of mycotoxins on aquatic animals.
13
Although in aquaculture the phenomenon
Similar discrepancies in OTA
of synergism has been scarcely described,
studies have also been reported,
it has been demonstrated that different
pointing out that there is still quite
mycotoxins can have synergistic
a lot that we don’t know about the
effects in aquaculture species.
metabolism and accumulation of mycotoxins in aquatic animals.
This means that combined negative effects of mycotoxins on productivity and health appear greater than the
Even if mycotoxins are present at a
sum of their individual effects.
low level, long-term ingestion of such feed may be a cause of unexplained mortalities that occur on aquafarms.
The presence of diverse mycotoxins can also cause general immunosuppression and opens the door for further
Clinical signs, which are only tip
health problems, including increased
of the iceberg, are inexistent and
susceptibility to infectious diseases.
easily can be associated with other pathologies. In most cases, mycotoxins affect growth, feed efficiency, reduce survival rate
The risk associated with
causing enormous economic losses.
the consumption of aquatic animals that have been fed mycotoxin contaminated feed is still not well understood. Some studies suggest that there is a relatively low risk of bioaccumulation of aflatoxins in the muscle tissue of fish and shrimp, while there is
Taking the example of catfish production, a 5% increase in FCR due to mycotoxin contamination can result in $250 million in extra feed costs to produce the same quantity of fish.
also some evidence that AFB1 residues are present in fish muscle in relevant concentrations and cause human health problems.
14
FUMONISINS, A RISING CONCERN
Fumonisins are naturally occurring toxins produced by several species of Fusarium fungi (molds), with
Fusarium moniliform recognized as the largest producer of this mycotoxin.
The presence of fumonisins in fish feed is associated with: Reduced growth rate Decreased feed intake
Fumonisins inhibit the sphinganine (sphingosine) N-acyltransferase (ceramide synthase), a key enzyme in lipid metabolism, resulting in disruption of this pathway.
As fumonisins are relatively stable at high temperature and processing conditions, it is expected that they will be found in finished feeds as well.
In recent surveys, including the data in this report, fumonisins has been the most predominant mycotoxins in corn (Raj et al., 2022) and animal/fish feed samples.
Poor feed conversion rate Disturbances in sphingolipid metabolism
In an experiment with one-year old carps (Cyprinus carpio), the toxic effect was accompanied by changes in the exocrine and endocrine pancreas and inter-renal tissue.
In rainbow trout, the presence of FB1 makes AFB1 more carcinogenic than if either were alone.
15
In young channel catfish, the
It appears that fish that are highly
final weight gain of fish exposed
dependent on lipid metabolism can
to moniliformin, AFB1 and
be very sensitive to fumonisins since
FB1 poly contamination was
they disrupt sphingolipid metabolism
42% lower than the control.
and consequently reduce growth and feed utilization, even at levels of (168 µg/kg feed FB1 and 333 µg/kg FB2).
In comparison, feeding feeds with equal contamination levels of either moniliformin or FB alone, resulted in a 16% and 23% lower final weight gain, respectively.
A study conducted by Pérez Acosta (2016) also described the synergistic effect between FB1 and AFB1.
CARRY-OVER OF MYCOTOXINS – HUMAN HEALTH CONCERN
Mycotoxins enter the food chain directly through their residues
The combination of these mycotoxins induced worse
in edible fish meat, posing an immediate threat to human health.
hepatopancreas damage, as compared to each of these mycotoxins alone.,
Gonçalves et. al. (2020) showed that low level of fumonisins
Bioaccumulation of mycotoxins in aquaculture seafood products
can affect sea bass and sea
is not widely reported and
bream growth performances.
consequently not regulated.
16
PREVENTION AS A SOLUTION
Given the known problems that mycotoxins can
The ultimate solution may lie in the use
cause, prevention of fungal development in
of feed additives that eliminate or reduce
feed and prevention of mycotoxin uptake in
the uptake of mycotoxins that adversely
aquatic species are imposed as a solution.
affect the growth, development, health, and immunity of aquatic species.
Deactivation strategies include: Prevention includes: Adsorption: clays, yeasts, and algae 1. Implementation of various multi-level strategies to apply feed safety criteria.
Biotransformation: pure enzymes or microorganisms
2. Traceability of the feed production chain from the field to fork.
Organ protection: different plant extracts, monoterpenoids. etc.
Each of these supplements should meet the following parameters: Pre-harvest control, such as the application of “Good Agricultural Practice” (GAP), can only reduce but cannot eliminate mycotoxins.
That is why focus should be on post-harvest control measures, maintaining acceptable storage conditions and producing feed in accordance with “good manufacturing practice “(GAP).
Efficiency Broad spectrum action Stability and speed of action Selectivity Safety Positive effect on health and production parameters Economic profitability
17
CONCLUSIONS In 2021, 64% of aqua feed samples received from Serbia, Spain, Vietnam, Turkey, Egypt, Senegal, Philippines, Uganda, Kenya, and Thailand received between January and November 2021, were contaminated with one or more than 1 mycotoxin.
Fumonisins (47%) and aflatoxins (36%) were the most prevalent mycotoxins detected in aquafeed samples using LC-MS/MS.
The literature data have shown that Fumonisins and aflatoxins can have synergistic effects on fish/shrimp production. Cooccurrence of more than one mycotoxin was also detected in 50 % of samples from these 10 countries. The co-occurrence of more than one mycotoxin can lead to additive or synergistic effects when fed to sensitive animal species (e.g., shrimps and fish amongst the others) and can result in carry over of mycotoxins for humans via fish/shrimp food. This study suggests that use of additives to combat mycotoxins and reduce their carry over to humans should be considered while feeding aquatic animals.
References on request.
18