MARC6000_thesis portfolio pt.2

Page 1


DESIGN PROPOSAL

Site arrangement

Centred around the alun-alun as the core element of the project, the site is divided into two sectors: the public realm (red) and the private realm (black), with the embassy programs arranged into three building masses. The public realm comprises the central alun-alun and parts of the chancellery sector, which includes the café/restaurant, function hall, library, farmhouse, consular section, and other complementary back-of-house facilities. This section of the site is accessible for all, guided from the grand entrance at the alun-alun, and has lower levels of security. The private realm includes two independent masses—the residence building and the office tower. The residence building is positioned close to the alun-alun due to its reception function, while the office tower is located at the back of the site for administrative purposes. These two buildings feature higher levels of security and are accessible only to relevant personnel; the office tower has a separate main entrance at the northern end of the site.

1. main entrance / drop off

2. ambassador’s residence entrance

3. alun-alun

4. cafe / restaurant

5. atrium garden

6. public toilet

7. function hall

8. consular section

9. library

10. consular office

11. rooftop farmhouse

12. carpark

Program arrangement, public realm

The arrangement of programs in the public realm is organised from leisure-based activities to more administrative functions, progressing from south to north. The most publicly engaging program, the alun-alun, is positioned at the southernmost side of the site, adjacent to the grand entrance. It is followed by the café/restaurant, farmhouse, function hall, and library, layered on top of one another, with the consular section placed at the northernmost end of the public realm. Vertically, spaces that are likely to receive more visitors (higher influx) are arranged at lower levels, with quieter programs positioned at higher levels. Similarly, the spatial quality of these programs transitions from fully open to fully enclosed, moving from south to north and from lower to higher levels.

1. alun-alun

2. ambassador’s lobby + gallery

3. salon

4. ambassador’s public dining

5. staff residence

6. ambassador’s bedroom space

7. ambassador’s private living

8. rooftop garden

9. carpark

Program arrangement, the residence building

The program distribution of the residence building follows a logic where more public spaces are placed at lower levels and more private spaces at higher levels. The lobby/gallery space, salon, and public dining area are arranged respectively from ground level to level 2, designed for diplomatic receptions and thus more public in nature. Juxtaposed with the open ground, these spaces share the openness of the alun-alun. The staff residence, ambassador’s bedroom, and living spaces are arranged respectively from levels 3 to 5. These private spaces are designed to have quieter quality and are hence distant from the vibrancy of the ground level while enjoying views to the south as the site slopes downwards.

1. carpark entrance

2. public carpark

3. plantroom

4. ambassador carpark

5. staff carpark

6. public circulation core

7+8. plantroom

9. office circulation core

10. carpark exit

Carpark

The carpark is entirely underground, with entrances and exits located at the corners of the grand entrance. It is divided into three sections, each with independent circulation cores linked to the programs above ground— namely, the public building, the residence building, and the office tower. The public section is accessible to all, featuring 10 vehicle parking spaces and 22 motorbike parking spaces. The residence parking section is designed exclusively for the ambassador and family, with 2 vehicle and 3 motorbike parking spaces. The office parking section is designated for staff at the office tower, featuring 16 vehicle and 8 motorbike parking spaces. Additionally, key plant rooms and storage spaces are arranged on this level.

1. main entrance / drop off

2. alun-alun

3. screening room

4. ambassador’s residence lobby

+ gallery space

5. gatehouse

The grand entrance of the site is marked by ascending staircases leading to the central alun-alun and a shaded drop-off area for arriving visitors. The shade then extends as a long, open-air corridor around the alunalun, guiding access to different sectors of the site. The alun-alun itself is a flat, open-air lawned common, designed to flexibly accommodate various events similar to a traditional alun-alun, including festive celebrations like Grebeg Maulud and Koningsdag, performances such as Wayang Kulit, and Sunday markets. The eastern end of the alun-alun includes a water plaza, which further enhances the liveliness of the space. The entrance of the residence building is marked by a slightly raised shade, leading to the screening room to ensure building security. The ground floor of the residence building features a transparent façade, inviting visitors at the alun-alun to view the gallery space at the lobby level.

Shading is designed along the perimeter of the alunalun to accommodate the pluvial climate of Nusantara. Additionally, the façade at ground level is transparent compared to the upper levels, inviting visitors to see into the gallery space at the lobby level.

render image entrance of the main building

This image shows the transition from the alun-alun to the main building is marked by raised shading and ascending staircases. This image also highlights the materiality of the project, where the use of exposed steel structural elements reflects the Dutch value of efficiency, while the transparent features align with the concept of openness.

1. main entrance / drop off

2. alun-alun

3. salon

4. kiosk

5. cafe / restaurant

6. mailroom

7. consular section circulation

8. storage

9. public space circulation

10. carpark circulation

11. kitchen

12. public toilet

13. office circulation

14. atrium garden

A kiosk is positioned at the entrance of the public building, where this feature could guide visitors to their intended destinations—for instance, the consular section located in the northern half of the building or the function hall on the level above. The café/restaurant is also placed at the front of the public building, designed as a casual space where visitors can socialise and relax while enjoying views of the alun-alun. The central atrium is a circulation space that houses two independent cores: the western one serving the consular section, and the eastern one serving other public spaces. Back-ofhouse functions, such as the kitchen and public toilets, are located at the northern end of this level. A circulation core at the north-eastern corner of the building allows staff to access the office tower if they entered the site from the alun-alun rather than the office entrance at the northern perimeter.

This image depicts the central atrium of the public building. Note that activities within and around this void are transparent, reflecting the intent of enlisting occupant movement to add liveliness to the space. The prominence of the circulation element also contributes to the concept of liveliness.

render image cafe + kiosk

This image is of the entrance space of the public building, with the café/restaurant in the foreground. Note the space is entirely open-air, which responds to the humid climate of Nusantara while creating a spacious and transparent atmosphere that reflects the concept of openness.

1. office entrance

2. screening room

3. office lobby

4. plant room

5. storage

6. function hall

7. storage

8. consular section

9. counter

10. interview room

11. ambassador’s public dining

12. servery

Due to the sloping contours of the site, the office tower entrance is located at this level. The office entrance displays heightened security, with a gatehouse, bollards, and a screening room when entering the building. The clear division between the consular section and other public functions within the public building is also evident in this drawing.

1. library

2. seminar room

3. storage

4. consular’s back office

5. tea point

6. deputy consul’s office

7. consul general’s office

8. open plan office

9. tea point

10. plantroom

11. storage

12. staff private residence

13. study

14. bedrooms

15. storage

1. rooftop farmhouse

2. office

3. ambassador’s bedroom space

4. storage

5. bedroom

6. guest bedroom

7. master bedroom

1. office

2. ambassador’s private dining

3. ambassador’s private living

4. kitchen

5. study 6. storage

1. open plan office 2. private office 3. meeting room 4. rooftop garden

1. ambassador’s office

2. chief of staff office

3. meeting room

4. tea point

5. storage

The design of this project features two façade typologies, with the public building differing from the other two. The public building’s façade consists of a glass-fin glazing skin and a lightweight balcony with shading. Its transparency and the ambiguity of enclosure created by the balcony align with the concept of openness, allowing the internal programs to connect more closely with the central alun-alun.

The two private buildings present a more concealed and understated appearance, reflecting the nature of their housing programs while highlighting the presence of the public interface of the site. The metal mesh façade ensures the security and privacy of these two buildings. Three distinctive forms of circulation space are depicted in this elevation, with circulation being a prominent design motif inspired by contemporary Dutch architecture. This gesture responds to the liveliness of the alun-alun, where the movement of occupants adds vibrancy to the imagery.

physical model southern perspective

physical model northern perspective

06

CONCLUSION

Reflecting on the proposal, the design process for the Dutch embassy in Nusantara stands as both an academic and architectural examination of colonial legacies, transcultural hybridity, and diplomacy. The design seeks to bridge historical divides by reframing the embassy as a space of mutual engagement rather than dominance. By anchoring the design around the alun-alun , the project consciously integrates an Indonesian cultural icon that colonial forces historically overlooked. This not only restores cultural significance but also demonstrates a shift from a Eurocentric ideology to an inclusive, locally grounded architecture.

In invoking Bhabha’s Third Space theory, the project positions the embassy as a site where Dutch and Indonesian identities can coexist and interact dynamically. This Third Space framework, while addressing critiques of oversimplified hybridity , allows for a nuanced approach to cultural integration, one that challenges static colonial perceptions and recognises the embassy as an evolving cultural narrative. However, in the process, I was reminded of the inherent complexity in interpreting postcolonial architecture—a field often constrained by ideological and historical expectations. The challenge lay in ensuring that hybridity and inclusivity did not obscure the reality of historical injustices but rather created a dialogue that could be sustained diplomatically and architecturally.

The embassy also incorporates elements of the Dutch polder model and architectural transparency, both of which represent diplomatic transparency and shared responsibility. By creating an environment where Dutch values of openness merge with Indonesian spatial practices, this project evokes a departure from colonial paradigms. The high-tech farmhouse within the embassy grounds encapsulates this spirit of cooperation, conveying the Netherlands’ willingness to share agricultural innovations with Indonesia as a gesture of partnership.

Ultimately, this design thesis affirms architecture’s capacity to address and reconcile historical legacies, transforming symbols of division into places of collaboration. The embassy, as a Third Space , becomes a medium for respectful diplomacy, shared progress, and a future built on lessons from the past.

+ ENDNOTES

REFERENCES

1. BBC News . ‘Indonesia Profile - Timeline’. 7 October 2011, sec. Asia. https://www.bbc.com/news/world - asia - pacific - 15114517

2. Bhabha, Homi K. The Location of Culture . 2nd Edition. London: Routledge, 2004.

3. ‘Alun - Alun’. In Wikipedia , 15 May 2024. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alunalun&oldid=1223963987

4. Schreuder, Yda. ‘The Polder Model in Dutch Economic and Environmental Planning’. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 21, no. 4 (1 August 2001): 237 – 45. https://doi.org/10.1177/027046760102100401

5. Tasevski, Olivia. ‘The Dutch Are Uncomfortable With Being History’s Villains, Not Victims’. Foreign Policy (blog), 10 August 2020. https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/08/10/dutch - colonial - history - indonesia - villains - victims/

6. The Editors of Encyclopaedia. ‘Culture System | Colonialism, Dutch East India Co. & Oppression’. Britannica, 22 June 2010. https://www.britannica.com/event/CultureSystem

7. Quora. ‘How Do Indonesians Feel about Dutch Colonisation? And Vice Versa (How Do Dutch People Feel)?’, 2018. https://www.quora.com/How - do - Indonesians - feel - aboutDutch - colonisation - And - vice - versa - how - do - dutch - people - feel

8. Dizikes, Peter. ‘The Complex Effects of Colonial Rule in Indonesia’. MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 6 February 2020. https://news.mit.edu/2020/sugar - factories - colonial - indonesia - olken - dell - 0206

9. Nekkers, J. A., and Petrus Adrianus Maria Malcontent. Fifty Years of Dutch Development Cooperation, 1949 - 1999 . Sdu Publishers, 2000.

10. Bhabha, Homi K. ‘Signs Taken for Wonders: Questions of Ambivalence’. In The Location of Culture , 2nd ed., 112. London: Routledge, 2004.

11. Guild, James. ‘Who Was Jakarta Built For?’ The Diplomat, 5 April 2022. https://thediplomat.com/2022/04/who - was - jakarta - built - for/

12. Mambrol, Nasrullah. ‘Homi Bhabha’s Concept of Hybridity – Literary Theory and Criticism’. Literariness, 8 April 2016. https://literariness.org/2016/04/08/homi - bhabhasconcept - of - hybridity/

13. Brouwer, Ina. ‘“Het Socialisme Als Poldermodel?” (“Socialism as Polder Model?”)’, 1990.

14. Mecking, Olga. ‘Where Dutch Directness Comes From’. BBC, 2 February 2018. https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20180131 - where - dutch - directness - comes - from

15. Info, Rotterdam. ‘Rotterdam, City of Architecture’. Rotterdam Info, 2014. https://en.rotterdam.info/architecture/

16. Bearne, Suzanne. ‘New Tech Boosts Dutch Drive for Sustainable Farming’. BBC , 3 September 2023. https://www.bbc.com/news/business - 66461769

17. Beech, Hannah. ‘What’s a President to Do When a Nation’s Capital Is Sinking? Move It.’ The New York Times , 16 May 2023, sec. Headway. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/05/16/headway/indonesia - nusantarajakarta.html

18. Quincieu, Eric. ‘Summary of Indonesia’s Agriculture, Natural Resources, and Environment Sector Assessment’, ADB Papers on Indonesia, no. 08 (30 October 2015). https://www.adb.org/publications/summary - indonesias - agriculture - natural - resourcesand - environment - sector - assessment

+ BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abraham, Thomas Kutty, and Arys Aditya. ‘Why Indonesia Is Shifting Its Capital From Jakarta: QuickTake - Bloomberg’. Bloomberg, 25 August 2019. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019 - 08 - 24/why - indonesia - is - shifting - its - capitalfrom - jakarta - quicktake?embedded - checkout=true .

‘Alun - Alun’. In Wikipedia , 15 May 2024. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alunalun&oldid=1223963987

‘Batavia Castle’. In Wikipedia , 31 October 2024. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Batavia_Castle&oldid=1254559877

BBC News . ‘Indonesia Profile - Timeline’. 7 October 2011, sec. Asia. https://www.bbc.com/news/world - asia - pacific - 15114517

Bearne, Suzanne. ‘New Tech Boosts Dutch Drive for Sustainable Farming’. BBC , 3 September 2023. https://www.bbc.com/news/business - 66461769

Beech, Hannah. ‘What’s a President to Do When a Nation’s Capital Is Sinking? Move It.’ The New York Times , 16 May 2023, sec. Headway. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/05/16/headway/indonesia - nusantara - jakarta.html

Bhabha, Homi K. ‘Signs Taken for Wonders: Questions of Ambivalence’. In The Location of Culture , 2nd ed., 112. London: Routledge, 2004.

The Location of Culture . 2nd Edition. London: Routledge, 2004.

Brouwer, Ina. ‘“Het Socialisme Als Poldermodel?” (“Socialism as Polder Model?”)’, 1990.

Carey, Shannon, Brittany Lynch, and Nick Naumann. ‘Indonesia Timeline’. Indonesia Imperialism, 2013. http://imperialismindonesia.weebly.com/indonesia - timeline.html

Divisare. ‘I.s.m.Architecten, Luis Diaz Diaz · FOMU - Museum of Photography Antwerp’, 2023. https://divisare.com/projects/496134 - i - s - m - architecten - luis - diaz - diaz - fomu - museum - ofphotography - antwerp

Dizikes, Peter. ‘The Complex Effects of Colonial Rule in Indonesia’. MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 6 February 2020. https://news.mit.edu/2020/sugar - factories - colonialindonesia - olken - dell - 0206

‘Dutch East Indies’. In Wikipedia , 4 November 2024. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dutch_East_Indies&oldid=1255347574

Guild, James. ‘Who Was Jakarta Built For?’ The Diplomat, 5 April 2022. https://thediplomat.com/2022/04/who - was - jakarta - built - for/

‘Indonesia Plans on Building Nusantara, a New Capital City - The New York Times’. Accessed 10 November 2024. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/05/16/headway/indonesianusantara - jakarta.html .

‘Indonesia – Netherlands Relations’. In Wikipedia , 5 November 2024. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indonesia%E2%80%93Netherlands_relations&oldid=1 255498335

Info, Rotterdam. ‘Rotterdam, City of Architecture’. Rotterdam Info, 2014. https://en.rotterdam.info/architecture/

Mambrol , Nasrullah. ‘Homi Bhabha’s Concept of Hybridity – Literary Theory and Criticism’. Literariness, 8 April 2016. https://literariness.org/2016/04/08/homi - bhabhas - concept - ofhybridity/

Mecking, Olga. ‘Where Dutch Directness Comes From’. BBC, 2 February 2018. https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20180131 - where - dutch - directness - comes - from

Metalocus. ‘Rotterdam, Best Architecture Guide. 20 Works (or More) to Understand Why Rotterdam Is the Largest Design Laboratory in Europe’, 6 February 2022. https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1uVdXfXUCnbnxJ4nmCk4z5GI0mDAQpQTl

Info, Rotterdam. ‘Rotterdam, City of Architecture’. Rotterdam Info, 2014. https://en.rotterdam.info/architecture/

“THE 3RD SPACE”

Mambrol , Nasrullah. ‘Homi Bhabha’s Concept of Hybridity – Literary Theory and Criticism’. Literariness, 8 April 2016. https://literariness.org/2016/04/08/homi - bhabhas - concept - ofhybridity/

Mecking, Olga. ‘Where Dutch Directness Comes From’. BBC, 2 February 2018. https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20180131 - where - dutch - directness - comes - from

Metalocus. ‘Rotterdam, Best Architecture Guide. 20 Works (or More) to Understand Why Rotterdam Is the Largest Design Laboratory in Europe’, 6 February 2022. https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1uVdXfXUCnbnxJ4nmCk4z5GI0mDAQpQTl .

Nekkers, J. A., and Petrus Adrianus Maria Malcontent. Fifty Years of Dutch Development Cooperation, 1949 - 1999 . Sdu Publishers, 2000.

Quincieu, Eric. ‘Summary of Indonesia’s Agriculture, Natural Resources, and Environment Sector Assessment’, ADB Papers on Indonesia, no. 08 (30 October 2015). https://www.adb.org/publications/summary - indonesias - agriculture - natural - resources - andenvironment - sector - assessment

Quora. ‘How Do Indonesians Feel about Dutch Colonisation? And Vice Versa (How Do Dutch People Feel)?’, 2018. https://www.quora.com/How - do - Indonesians - feel - about - Dutchcolonisation - And - vice - versa - how - do - dutch - people - feel

Schreuder, Yda. ‘The Polder Model in Dutch Economic and Environmental Planning’. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 21, no. 4 (1 August 2001): 237 – 45. https://doi.org/10.1177/027046760102100401

Seaming, Helen. ‘NETHERLANDS’. 20th Century Architecture, 2005. http://architecturehistory.org/schools/NETHERLANDS.html

Studley, Kew. ‘SSdH’. AFASIAARCHZINE.COM (blog), 7 February 2024. https://afasiaarchzine.com/2024/02/ssdh - studley - kew/

Tasevski, Olivia. ‘The Dutch Are Uncomfortable With Being History’s Villains, Not Victims’. Foreign Policy (blog), 10 August 2020. https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/08/10/dutch - colonialhistory - indonesia - villains - victims/

The Editors of Encyclopaedia. ‘Culture System | Colonialism, Dutch East India Co. & Oppression’. Britannica, 22 June 2010. https://www.britannica.com/event/Culture - System

Walters, Oliver, and John David Legge. ‘History of Indonesia - Dutch Rule from 1815 to c. 1920’. Britannica. Accessed 10 November 2024. https://www.britannica.com/topic/history - ofIndonesia/Dutch - rule - from -1815 - to - c - 1920

semester 2, thesis studio 2024

The Dutch Embassy in Nusantara

“the 3rd space”

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.