The Involving Young People Fund: Wakefield and Barnsley What happens when you support young people to invest £90,000 in their communities?
September 2026
The Involving Young People Fund: Wakefield and Barnsley
Contents aBOUT THIS REPORT Introduction
3
The Involving Young People Fund
4
Timeline
7
Impact on those involved
10
What worked well
14
Areas for Improvement
18
Reflections and Lessons Learned
22
Glossary
24
Acknowledgements
25
This report shares learning from the development and delivery of the Involving Young People Fund, a youthled initiative piloted in Wakefield and Barnsley. Written by Edd Fry, an Associate at HUDL Youth Development Agency, draws from a detailed internal learning report produced by Do You Research, the learning partner for the Fund. We are also grateful for the input of the Involving Young People Collective, Esmée Fairbairn Foundation, HUDL Youth Development Agency, Leeds Community Foundation and The Youth Association. Special thanks are due to the young people who have served this work so diligently, whether as part of the Youth Panel for the Fund or consultants with the Involving Young People Collective. Note on the language used in this report Where possible, we have tried to use everyday language which is accessible to all readers. Any words or phrases which we think might be less well understood by those who don’t work in the sector are explained in the glossary at the back of this report.
Home
Introduction
The IYPF
Timeline
Impact
What worked well
Areas for improvement
Reflections
Glossary
2
The Involving Young People Fund: Wakefield and Barnsley
Introduction At the end of 2025, the Involving Young People Fund (IYPF) distributed £90,000 to seven organisations working with young people in Barnsley and Wakefield. Young people from these communities decided which issues they wanted to address in their local areas; designed a process so organisations could apply for funding; and chose which organisations should get a share of the money. Throughout, they were trained and supported by their peers: young people who had developed grant-making expertise through their involvement in Esmée Fairbairn Foundation’s Involving Young People Collective (IYPC).
Home
Introduction
The IYPF
This report shares what happened throughout this multi-year, youth-led process. It provides an overview of the project’s objectives as well as outlining the contributions of all the different partners whose skills and experience were vital to the pilot’s success. It also draws on the experience of the Involving Young People Fund to offer some reflections for other organisations interested in participatory grant-making alongside young people. We hope they’re useful.
Timeline
Impact
What worked well
What this report does not offer is a formula for involving young people in grant-making. As will become evident, the majority of the successes enjoyed by the Involving Young People Fund were rooted in relationships: relationships built on trust, communication, and considerable efforts to know, understand and respect one another. Building these relationships took time, skill and commitment, and it is this work, and the resources to sustain it, which should underpin all efforts to involve young people in philanthropy.
Areas for improvement
Reflections
Glossary
3
The Involving Young People Fund: Wakefield and Barnsley
The Involving Young People Fund Objectives The Involving Young People Fund was a £90,000 funding programme which gave young people from Wakefield and Barnsley the power to fund local projects they cared about. It was conceived and led by the Involving Young People Collective, who worked in collaboration with Leeds Community Foundation, The Youth Association and Esmée Fairbairn Foundation, with support from HUDL Youth Development Agency.
Introduction
The IYPF
To invest in place-based work, working with young people and partners rooted in the relevant communities For the process to benefit all participants, both immediately and in the medium to long-term To capture learning throughout the process, informing the work as it developed, contributing to sector-wide learning about participatory grant-making, and exploring what aspects of the work might be replicable by existing partners or others
Learn more about the seven organisations awarded funding
Home
To explore participatory grant-making with young people, using different partners to bring in relevant experience and expertise
To upskill participants, both individuals and organisations
Timeline
Impact
What worked well
Areas for improvement
Reflections
Glossary
4
The Involving Young People Fund: Wakefield and Barnsley
Who was involved? Youth Panel 11 young people from Wakefield and Barnsley recruited to co-design the Fund and learning programme as well as lead the decisionmaking process Local knowledge, young people's expertise
Key contribution and expertise
Involving Young People Collective
Leeds Community Foundation
Established in 2020, the IYPC is made up of 12 young people who work as consultants with Esmée Fairbairn Foundation
An independent, regional funder that provided support to the IYPF and Youth Panel
A regional youth work charity for Yorkshire that provided support to the Involving Young People Fund Panel
Values for co-production, youth leadership, grantmaking experience, project delivery
Local knowledge, grantmaking expertise
Youth work, access and expertise
Youth Association
EsmÉe Fairbairn Foundation
HUDL Youth Development Agency
Do You Research
An independent, national funder that provided funding and support for the IYPF. They commissioned HUDL to work alongside the foundation and the Involving Young People Collective
National agency focused on creating better opportunities for young people. They provide support to the Involving Young People Collective
An independent research organisation that supported the Youth Panel on evaluation skills, working with them and partners to evaluate the Involving Young People Fund
Facilitation, governance and project support, partnership expertise
Research and evaluation expertise
Resource, grant-making expertise
Home
Introduction
The IYPF
5
Timeline
Impact
What worked well
Areas for improvement
Reflections
Glossary
The Involving Young People Fund: Wakefield and Barnsley
Values for co-production nothing about us withous us
Throughout the programme, the work was guided by the Involving Young People Collective’s 10 values for co-production. These values, first published in 2022 and reviewed every year by the Collective, provided a reference point for how all the partners should work together. They were shared with partners as they joined the project, discussed during onboarding processes, and were helpful when navigating challenges.
culture of learning
Accessibility
allow learning to shape work
The Panel of young people put particular emphasis on three of the values - nothing about us without us, accessibility, and a culture of learning. Learn more about the 10 values of co-production
Home
Introduction
The IYPF
Timeline
Impact
What worked well
Areas for improvement
Reflections
Glossary
6
The Involving Young People Fund: Wakefield and Barnsley
Timeline
Development
aration Prep There were three stages to the Involving Young People Fund: Development, which included the original ideas and progress through research
Delivery
Preparation, which involved establishing the relationships and infrastructure to deliver the Fund Delivery, which covered all the work in assessing applications, making funding decisions and distributing resources.
Key insight:
In looking back at the programme’s journey, two themes emerged.
Young people shaped the Fund at every stage - from ideas and research through to decision‑making and delivery.
partners stepped forward or back 1 Different through the different stages, adding experience, expertise and resources where necessary, and creating space when the work required it.
people had genuine leadership roles 2 Young throughout. Which young people were involved
evolved alongside the work, but the Fund was shaped - from the start - by the ideas, ambitions and values of those it sought to serve.
Home
Introduction
The IYPF
Timeline
Impact
What worked well
Areas for improvement
Reflections
Glossary
7
The Involving Young People Fund: Wakefield and Barnsley 8
Timeline
2022
2023
Lead partners: IYPC, Esmée, HUDL First discussions begin about what will become the Involving Young People Fund, which are facilitated by HUDL
Lead partners: IYPC, Esmée, HUDL
Early 2024
Esmée confirms funding for a pilot participatory grantmaking programme
Lead partners: IYPC, Esmée, HUDL, Leeds Community Foundation, Youth Association
IYPC begins designing the funding programme - supported by HUDL and Esmée
Both Esmée and the IYPC express interest in participatory grant-making
Research phase includes: Lived experience insights from the Collective Desk research supported by Esmée Exploration of UK areas with complex challenges and large youth populations
The Involving Young People Fund announced as a place-based programme in Wakefield and Barnsley, with the IYPC visiting both areas to share its vision and approach The Youth Association and Leeds Community Foundation appointed as delivery partners Local young people invited to apply to be on the Panel 11 young people selected and the Panel convenes for the first time Do You Research is appointed as the Learning Partner
Home
Introduction
The IYPF
Timeline
Impact
What worked well
Areas for improvement
Reflections
Glossary
The Involving Young People Fund: Wakefield and Barnsley
Timeline
Late 2024 Lead partners: IYPC, Youth Panel, Leeds Community Foundation, Youth Association A Delivery Team is set up to manage the delivery of the Fund, comprising four members of the IYPC, one HUDL member and one Youth Association member
July: Panel interviews shortlisted organisations and Panel holds away day to make final funding decisions
The Panel develops knowledge and skills for grant-making Key activities include: Identifying funding priorities through lived experience, research, and a survey of 100 local young people Designing and testing inclusive application and decision-making processes, including exploring bias
Introduction
The IYPF
May: The Fund opens for Expressions of Interest and Leeds Community Foundation conducts due diligence on applications June: The Panel reviews eligible EOIs and creates shortlist
The Delivery Team and Panel codesign the learning programme
Home
2025
December: Funding decisions shared with applicants, eight funded organisations announced and funding distributed by Leeds Community Foundation Ongoing support provided by Leeds Community Foundation and Esmée
2026 The pilot of the Involving Young People Fund closes
Throughout the year, Do You Research supports the IYPF to capture learning through training, observation, interviews, fieldwork and analysis sessions.
Timeline
Impact
What worked well
Areas for improvement
Reflections
Glossary
9
The Involving Young People Fund: Wakefield and Barnsley
10
Impact on those involved 2. Shaped by shared values 1. Fairer, more relevant decisions
Embedding the Values for Co-production throughout the project fostered trust, inclusion, and measurable skill gains, while establishing a supportive environment which participants found compassionate and respectful of boundaries.
Partners in the programme felt that involving local young people in the grant-making process made decisions fairer, more inclusive, and more relevant to the communities the Fund aimed to serve.
Home
Introduction
The IYPF
The values shaped the Fund's culture and contributed to capacity-building and potential changes in funder practice.
G PEOPLE FUND INVOLVING YOUN
Timeline
Impact
What worked well
Areas for improvement
Reflections
Glossary
The Involving Young People Fund: Wakefield and Barnsley
Impact on those involved
11
3. Learning together All parties developed skills and knowledge over the course of the pilot programme. Gaining insight into grant-making
Young people building confidence and skills This was the programme’s most significant impact. Participants described personal transformation, improved communication, and more positive outlooks on life, including higher aspirations for their futures. Some overcame shyness, learned to challenge ideas constructively, and developed optimism about their futures. This created ripple effects beyond the project, with skills and relationships serving as practical, transferable assets young people will carry forward.
Home
Introduction
The IYPF
Timeline
Most young people moved from a simplistic understanding of grantmaking to operational knowledge of eligibility criteria, due diligence, and decision-making processes - learning through doing.
Partners developing grantmaking knowledge The Youth Association experienced the clearest partner knowledge gain around grantmaking. They have subsequently partnered with Leeds Community Foundation on another fund, demonstrating practical application and transferability of learning.
Impact
What worked well
Areas for improvement
Adopting new ways of working Grant-making organisations in the partnership learnt new ways of working which put young people in charge of the design, process and decisions. Leeds Community Foundation are applying what they learnt to other programmes, increasing the involvement of young people in decision-making.
Reflections
Glossary
The Involving Young People Fund: Wakefield and Barnsley
Impact on those involved
“I was always a very negative individual with a very depressing outlook on life because I always thought that once I get to be an adult, I have to worry about money, paying rent…I think being involved in this process and getting the chance to be here, just seeing you guys all the time and how happy you are every day…it really helped me become more positive and ultimately just shaped me into a better individual” - Panel member
- Panel member
Introduction
The IYPF
- Leeds Community Foundation staff member
“We at The Youth Association know that we've gained and grown and learned a lot from this process as well, in terms of participatory grant making and making programmes like this possible for young people in our areas.”
“After my experience I'm like, I'm a better person than I was.”
Home
“What was really good about this particular programme [was to] take aspects of it forward into the future design of other programmes that might involve young people… We are doing it with another funder…where we've got young people making the decision”
- Youth Association staff member
Timeline
Impact
What worked well
Areas for improvement
Reflections
Glossary
12
The Involving Young People Fund: Wakefield and Barnsley
Impact on those involved
4. Sharing power and accountability Power-sharing between national and local organisations proved successful. Esmée Fairbairn Foundation, the Involving Young People Collective and HUDL deliberately stepped back while local partners brought knowledge and expertise relevant to Barnsley and Wakefield, translating the initial ideas and ambitions behind the Fund into the local context. All partners, whether national or local, were open to learning and sharing, with power and accountability flowing in both directions. For Esmée and the other national partners, deciding to “step back” did not mean they intended to be disengaged from the Fund. Rather, it reflected a shift in accountability — one that relied on trust in local expertise rather than control from above.
Home
Introduction
The IYPF
This repositioning of power was seen as crucial in legitimising the voices of young people and community partners within a national funding structure. However, embedded structural tensions were still present: ultimate financial responsibility remained with Esmée, inherently creating a power imbalance. Closer relationships between national and local funders, with explicit dialogue about these tensions, may have improved the process by providing better support for partners and, therefore, young people. These issues were acknowledged by staff at Esmée.
Timeline
“We have a lot of different connections. Like, how can we really be like a partner in the work rather than here you go, here's a pot of money?” - Esmée staff member
Impact
What worked well
Areas for improvement
Reflections
Glossary
13
The Involving Young People Fund: Wakefield and Barnsley
What worked well Relationships and trust The foundation of everything that worked well. Trust developed organically, beginning with Esmée's willingness to hand over resources without imposing processes or attempting to control delivery, and also in response to deliberate and targeted effort. For example, responsive dialogue with the Panel helped maintain and repair trust when it was tested and young people reported feeling listened to and valued when partners took their concerns seriously and acted on them.
Home
Introduction
The IYPF
Timeline
Leveraging existing relationships
Dedicated youth support Professional youth workers provided consistent support, created safe spaces, and continuously adapted facilitation based on feedback.The delivery team co-designed decisionmaking tools with young people and tested scoring systems with real examples, then iterated based on input. Together, these practices transformed abstract concepts of participation into tangible experiences of shared power.
Impact
What worked well
Several young people on the Panel highlighted the presence of The Youth Association’s youth worker as central to their ability to participate, bringing a trauma informed approach to the work and ensuring young people didn’t have to repeat their stories to new partners.
Areas for improvement
Reflections
Glossary
14
The Involving Young People Fund: Wakefield and Barnsley
What worked well
Local expertise Local knowledge and contextual expertise was invaluable. Working with Leeds Community Foundation and The Youth Association ensured decisions were grounded in place-based realities: The Youth Association's local presence in particular challenged assumptions and provided insights about Wakefield and Barnsley that national partners lacked.
Inclusion-led flexibility The Panel particularly valued flexibility when it centred inclusion. For example, adapting meeting formats, offering additional preparation time and providing one to one conversations for those who found the group settings more challenging.
Flexible and responsive facilitation This enabled the Panel to engage on their own terms and shape the project's inclusive character. The Delivery Team continuously adapted formats, communication channels, and session structures based on young people's feedback (which was proactively sought) and needs. Early discussions about how meetings should be formatted demonstrated this co-design approach and strengthened young people’s sense of power sharing.
Home
Introduction
The IYPF
Timeline
Impact
What worked well
Multi-channel communication such as Slack, shared documents, followup messages and check-ins helped maintain continuity when disruptions occurred, including occasional noshows, competing commitments, technical issues or changes in staff roles.
Areas for improvement
Reflections
Glossary
15
The Involving Young People Fund: Wakefield and Barnsley
What worked well
Accessible recruitment The recruitment process for the Panel emphasised accessibility. Extensive information was shared about the fund and its purpose across the local area, including an FAQ pack, a job description which emphasised no prior grant making experience was necessary, and an introductory glossary. The Youth Association shared these materials through their networks and IYPC members visited Barnsley and Wakefield in January to deliver information sessions.
Home
Introduction
The IYPF
Timeline
Accessible onboarding and tailored feedback The application process also had a strong focus on accessibility. It included an online information session, followed by a short interview to understand the applicants’ motivations for applying and to explore any access needs they may have. The interviews were conducted by The Youth Association and the Delivery Team.
Impact
What worked well
Successful candidates received an offer letter, onboarding checklist, welcome pack, and an introduction call. Unsuccessful applicants received tailored rejection messages that aimed to keep them connected to future opportunities.
Areas for improvement
Reflections
Glossary
16
The Involving Young People Fund: Wakefield and Barnsley
What worked well
Values-led culture The 10 Values for Co-production improved the partnership’s relationships and supported the individual outcomes of everyone involved. Practices rooted in the values fostered trust, inclusion and measurable psychosocial and skill gains. Panel members described feeling very supported during the project. The values, particularly that around inclusion being embedded in the approach, absolutely contributed to this.
Home
Introduction
The IYPF
Timeline
Peer-led delivery
Visual learning tools On decision-making days, the Delivery Team used a variety of learning methods to support understanding. Visual tools in particular were key: when criteria, agreements and decisions were visible on whiteboards or projected onto walls, it helped the panel stay focused and use the visual cues to be able to refer back to the discussion. When these were missing or forgotten for some of the expressions of interest, they found it trickier to keep up.
Impact
What worked well
The leadership of young people in the delivery team ensured that the team were well-placed to cut through complex issues with the young people on the Panel, using their own knowledge and experience of grantmaking to create accessible, engaging content for their peers.
Areas for improvement
Reflections
Glossary
17
The Involving Young People Fund: Wakefield and Barnsley
Areas for improvement Scheduling challenges Role clarity Partners’ flexibility - in response to both the programme’s evolution and also feedback from the Panel - was central to the Fund’s success. However, at times it also led to uncertainty. Some partners were unsure about expectations, and the Delivery Team often took on more operational work than intended. At points, it was not always easy to maintain alignment between different partners and staff were unclear on when they would be needed. In order to strengthen the shared power approach further, greater clarity on roles, expectations and deadlines could have helped.
Home
Introduction
The IYPF
Timeline
Across the project, scheduling was one of the most complex aspects of delivery. Youth-led work often involves participants balancing multiple roles, and many members of the Panel and delivery team were combining their commitment to the IYPF with education, part-time work and other responsibilities. To support scheduling and engagement, the delivery team issued calendar invites up to three months in advance, shared session slides with timelines and milestones, and added four additional in-person days when it became clear that co-design worked best face to face.
Impact
What worked well
All meeting resources were shared at least seven days in advance. Despite these efforts, it was not possible to find dates that suited everyone all the time and even with the final elements of the decisionmaking process - such as interviewing shortlisted applicants some Panel members were more involved than others.
Areas for improvement
Reflections
Glossary
18
The Involving Young People Fund: Wakefield and Barnsley
Areas for improvement
Pay arrangements Young people knew they would be paid for their participation, but the exact payment method and rate were not finalised before panellists joined the Fund. In particular, there was uncertainty over whether payments would be made by voucher or bank transfer, and further discussion was needed to agree a flat hourly rate that reflected both the local context and the young people’s expertise. This resulted in delays to payment, causing frustration among some Panel members.
Pacing and contingency planning The pacing of the project meant that it could be difficult to fix gaps when they did emerge, with few opportunities to add in extra sessions or revisit difficult conversations and decisions. This could be particularly challenging if, for example, a key facilitator was away with insufficient contingency built in to cover their absence in a way which worked for all Panel members.
Home
Introduction
The IYPF
This underlines the importance of being transparent about fees from the outset, enabling young people to choose how they are paid, and offering guidance to those receiving benefits or new to self-employment.
However, once a resolution was reached, panellists were able to choose their preferred payment method and agree a clear flat rate, which helped rebuild trust by showing that their concerns had been heard and acted on.
Timeline
Impact
What worked well
Areas for improvement
Reflections
Glossary
19
The Involving Young People Fund: Wakefield and Barnsley
Areas for improvement
Accessible language Partner organisations who were less used to working with young people needed more input and support from the delivery team to make their expertise accessible. For example, for most Panel members, grant making terminology was unfamiliar. No prior knowledge was required for the role, and the group initially experienced jargon as a barrier, requiring more plain-language explanations, repetition and practical exercises, which the Delivery Team were better placed to support with.
Home
Introduction
The IYPF
Imbalance in reach and engagement
Support with knowledge and expertise Efforts to share power and create space sometimes resulted in partners holding significant responsibilities but without the capacity or expertise to deliver. Esmée’s decision to take a hands-off approach was well-intentioned and with the aim of minimising power imbalances, but in practice it meant that some in-house knowledge and expertise, as well as external contacts and networks, which could have been beneficial to the programme and to partners, were not made available.
Timeline
Impact
What worked well
Despite ambitions to work evenly across Barnsley and Wakefield, the Fund was not able to get the same traction in Barnsley as it was in Wakefield: there were fewer applications from young people to be panellists, fewer applications from organisations for funding, and fewer organisations who received funding.
Areas for improvement
Reflections
Glossary
20
The Involving Young People Fund: Wakefield and Barnsley
Areas for improvement
Visibility of the Values Although the 10 Values for CoProduction were useful to both panellists and partners, they were not consistently visible throughout the Fund’s lifetime. Including summaries, refreshers, and guidance on how each value related to the Fund could have ensured all parties felt confident referring back to them during discussions.
Home
Introduction
The IYPF
Timeline
Impact
What worked well
Areas for improvement
Reflections
Glossary
21
The Involving Young People Fund: Wakefield and Barnsley
Reflections and lessons learned Value of peer support
Collaboration
Young people training and supporting young people is an effective way to bring different perspectives and expertise into grant-making. Young people who have already learned about grant-making are well-placed to help their peers navigate a new field of work, proactively identifying barriers based on their own experience, explaining jargon and demystifying the process.
Bringing together different partners in a way which allows each of them to bring their experience and expertise to bear is a challenging task, requiring excellent communication, deep trust and strong relationships. However, the output is worthwhile with each partner able to bring valuable skills and insight to the work.
Resource participation Creating the conditions for these partnerships to flourish requires time, skill and resources. Time is necessary to build trust, explore differences and find resolutions which satisfy all partners. It is also essential that young people are given time to learn about grant-making and the issues being addressed, otherwise they are not well placed to challenge or bring different perspectives, and participation risks becoming tokenistic. Skill, including youthspecific expertise, is important in framing and holding conversations so that all partners feel able to fully contribute. Securing staff time and input requires resource, as does properly compensating young people for their expertise and experience.
Home
Introduction
The IYPF
Timeline
Impact
What worked well
Areas for improvement
Reflections
Glossary
22
The Involving Young People Fund: Wakefield and Barnsley
Reflections and lessons learned
Transparency over trade-offs and non-negotiables
Learning by doing
While time and resources are essential, they are limited, with deadlines and budgets to consider. It helps to discuss trade-offs with participants, agree priorities, and clarify how these shape the budget. Any non-negotiables should be clear from the start for example, if in-person meetings are essential for building relationships, ensure everyone understands why.
All parties benefit from learning by doing. With sufficient planning, support and safeguarding, giving partners the opportunity to learn through delivery was a more equitable way of working than using a more traditional or theoretical approach.
Shared values
Building skills in working with young people
Agreeing common values at the start of the project is a valuable way to keep the programme focused on its overarching objectives, and gives all parties a tool which they can refer back to when raising questions and challenges. The values should be visible throughout and referred to often to ensure they remain relevant.
Supporting professional grant-makers to develop their skills in working with young people is an important investment which benefits all parties. Young people with experience of grant-making are well-placed to support with this work, helping to identify where there is scope for support with, for example, communication.
Home
Introduction
The IYPF
Timeline
Impact
What worked well
Areas for improvement
Reflections
Glossary
23
The Involving Young People Fund: Wakefield and Barnsley
Glossary Facilitation: designing and creating spaces where all attendees feel supported to learn and share their expertise and experience. Grant-making: the practice of identifying a charitable objective, designing a strategy to realise that objective, and then making grants to organisations and/or individuals who will collaborate in this work. Grants: the money given by a charitable trust or foundation to a recipient, often in response to an application. Participatory grant-making: involving people with experience of the challenge which is being addressed in the development of the solution. Philanthropy: donating private resources to try and achieve charitable aims. While this glossary tries to define some well-known words and phrases, the definitions are specific to the Involving Young People Fund.
Young people: for the IYPC, young people are defined as being aged between 18 and 27. For the Youth Panel, young people are defined as being aged between 16 and 23.
Home
Introduction
The IYPF
Timeline
Impact
What worked well
Areas for improvement
Reflections
Glossary
24
The Involving Young People Fund: Wakefield and Barnsley
Acknowledgements Thank you to everyone who contributed their time, expertise, and insights to the creation of this report. Youth Panel: Kaitlyn, Kai, Drew, Leah, Erin, Libby, Maria, Tomm, Rey, Harry, Troy IYPC Facilitators: Kimberly Garande, Daniel Mapatac, Chelbi Hillan, Thalia Papanicolaou HUDL: Floree Zama Neagra, Keji Okeowo
Do You Research: Ella Fryer Smith, Remi Sade Author: Edd Fry, HUDL Youth Development Agency Illustrations on the front cover and pages 4, 8, 9, 10, and 11, by Art of Birdie
Esmée Fairbairn Foundation 6th Floor, 210 Pentonville Road London N1 9JY 020 7812 3700 info@esmeefairbairn.org.uk www.esmeefairbairn.org.uk Charity no. 200051
The Youth Association: Dmitri Fedotov, Nathan Martin, Gill Arabskyj Leeds Community Foundation: Shahed Molvi, Ilona Haslewood, Alexandra Koupis, Hannah Buckley Esmée Fairbairn Foundation: Siân Jessica Lewis, Veda Harrison, Halimah Haque
Home
Introduction
The IYPF
Timeline
Impact
What worked well
Areas for improvement
Reflections
Glossary
25