Third-party peacemakers in judaism: text, theory, and practice 1st edition daniel roth - The ebook i

Page 1


Third-PartyPeacemakersinJudaism:Text,Theory, andPractice1stEditionDanielRoth

https://ebookmass.com/product/third-party-peacemakers-injudaism-text-theory-and-practice-1st-edition-daniel-roth/

Instant digital products (PDF, ePub, MOBI) ready for you

Download now and discover formats that fit your needs...

Understanding Development: Theory and Practice in the Third World John Rapley

https://ebookmass.com/product/understanding-development-theory-andpractice-in-the-third-world-john-rapley/ ebookmass.com

Trauma: Contemporary Directions in Theory, Practice, and Research 1st Edition, (Ebook PDF)

https://ebookmass.com/product/trauma-contemporary-directions-intheory-practice-and-research-1st-edition-ebook-pdf/

ebookmass.com

Care in Healthcare: Reflections on Theory and Practice 1st Edition Franziska Krause

https://ebookmass.com/product/care-in-healthcare-reflections-ontheory-and-practice-1st-edition-franziska-krause/

ebookmass.com

Always the First to Die R. J. Jacobs

https://ebookmass.com/product/always-the-first-to-die-r-j-jacobs-6/

ebookmass.com

5 Steps to a 5: AP U.S. History 2021 Elite Student Edition

https://ebookmass.com/product/5-steps-to-a-5-ap-u-shistory-2021-elite-student-edition-daniel-p-murphy/

ebookmass.com

One of the Good Guys Araminta Hall

https://ebookmass.com/product/one-of-the-good-guys-araminta-hall/

ebookmass.com

The Golden Couple Greer Hendricks & Sarah Pekkanen

https://ebookmass.com/product/the-golden-couple-greer-hendricks-sarahpekkanen/

ebookmass.com

Heterogeneous Catalysis in Sustainable Synthesis (Advances in Green and Sustainable Chemistry) 1st Edition Béla Török

https://ebookmass.com/product/heterogeneous-catalysis-in-sustainablesynthesis-advances-in-green-and-sustainable-chemistry-1st-editionbela-torok/ ebookmass.com

Jace Sasha Summers [Summers

https://ebookmass.com/product/jace-sasha-summers-summers-2/

ebookmass.com

Hotel Design, Planning and Development 2nd Edition, (Ebook PDF)

https://ebookmass.com/product/hotel-design-planning-anddevelopment-2nd-edition-ebook-pdf/

ebookmass.com

Third-Party Peacemakers in Judaism

Third-Party Peacemakers in Judaism

Text, Theory, and Practice

3

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and certain other countries.

Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America.

© Oxford University Press 2021

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, by license, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction rights organization. Inquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above.

You must not circulate this work in any other form and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

Names: Roth, Daniel, Rabbi, Dr., 1975–author. Title: Third-party peacemakers in Judaism : text, theory, and practice / Daniel Roth.

Description: New York : Oxford University Press, 2021. | Includes bibliographical references and index.

Identifiers: LCCN 2020052882 (print) | LCCN 2020052883 (ebook) | ISBN 9780197566770 (hardback) | ISBN 9780197566794 (epub)

Subjects: LCSH: Conflict management—Religious aspects—Judaism. | Mediation—Religious aspects—Judaism. | Peace in rabbinical literature. | Jewish ethics. Classification: LCC BJ1286.C65 .R68 2021 (print) | LCC BJ1286.C65 (ebook) | DDC 296.3/6—dc23

LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2020052882

LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2020052883

DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197566770.001.0001

1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2

Printed by Sheridan Books, Inc., United States of America

In loving memory of my beloved father, Larry Roth z”l, a genuine lover of peace and pursuer of peace

1. From Muhammad to Sulha: Religious and Traditional Cultural Models of Third-Party Peacemaking 9

2. Judaism’s Paradigmatic Third-Party Peacemaker: Legends of Aaron, the Pursuer of Peace, in Classical Rabbinic Literature 37

3. From Rabbi Meir to Beruria: Legends of Third-Party Peacemakers in Classical Rabbinic Literature 91

4. From Rabbi Yosef Syracusty to Rabbi Nissi al-Nahrawani: Historical Accounts and Stories of Third-Party Rabbinic Peacemakers in Medieval and Early-Modern Rabbinic Literature 141

5. Rodfei Shalom, Metavkhei Shalom, Pashranim, and Nikhbadim: Historical Accounts and Stories of Third-Party Lay Peacemakers in Medieval and Early-Modern Rabbinic Literature 207

Conclusion: The Text, Theory, Practice, and Scope of Third-Party Peacemakers in Judaism

Preface

In the winter of 2003, in the middle of the Second Intifada during which extreme violence was taking place between Israelis and Palestinians, I was busy studying Greek as part of the requirements for my MA in Talmud at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. I was struggling to see how all of the philological-historical skills I was working so hard to acquire in order to analyze ancient rabbinic texts were benefiting the world I was living in.

I decided to take a course in mediation, as this had been a longtime passion of mine and it felt incredibly practical. At the end of the course I asked the instructor, Michael Tsur, if he was aware of any books that connect religion, and in particular Judaism, with conflict resolution. While he hadn’t heard of any book on the subject, he did refer me to two books on the relationship between culture and conflict resolution: Kevin Avruch’s Culture and Conflict Resolution and David Augsburger’s Conflict Mediation across Cultures. 1

I knew then that I wanted to write my PhD dissertation on Judaism and conflict resolution; I just didn’t know where and on what specifically. I began searching the web for PhD programs in conflict resolution all over the world, but none of them seemed to indicate any interest in religion. Then I came across a web page of an academic conference that had taken place the previous year right outside of Tel Aviv, at Bar-Ilan University’s Program on Conflict Management and Negotiation (currently known as the Conflict Resolution, Management and Negotiation Graduate Program). The conference was called “Religion and Conflict Resolution.” It featured Prof. Gerald Steinberg, founder and director of the program at Bar-Ilan, together with others, including Rabbi Dr. Marc Gopin and Dr. R. Scott Appleby.2 The program website also advertised itself as wanting to advance the field of mediation and conflict resolution within the context of Jewish tradition and culture.3 This convinced me that the right place to conduct my research was at Bar-Ilan, which as a religious university had an appreciation for the integration of religion and science.

I enthusiastically met with Prof. Steinberg and pitched to him my original thesis topic—the study of contradictory interpretations of biblical conflict narratives through the lens of a mediator. He wasn’t convinced. He chastised

me for not presenting an academic research question appropriate for conflict resolution studies, and proceeded to show me the door to the hermeneutics department down the hall. However, he also gave me the phone number of someone who was working for an NGO called Common Denominator, whose goal was to bridge the religious-secular divide in Israel, and encouraged me to write my dissertation about their work.

The wind was completely knocked out of me.

For a year or so after this encounter, I was incredibly frustrated and discouraged. I so desperately wanted to connect my two passions, Judaism and conflict resolution, but couldn’t seem to figure out how. I eventually contacted the person Prof. Steinberg recommended. After pitching my idea of conflict resolution workshops using the interpretation of biblical conflicts stories, he handed me a book that would change my life: Rabbi Dr. Marc Gopin’s Between Eden and Armageddon: The Future of World Religions, Violence, and Peacemaking.

In this now foundational book in the field of religion and peacebuilding, Dr. Gopin describes Aaron, the biblical high priest and older brother of Moses, as “the ideal Jewish peacemaker,” contrasting his mediation methods to contemporary models. He also writes about the legend of Rabbi Meir (3rd cent. ce) serving as a third-party peacemaker between a husband and wife. He concludes:

The ideal Jewish peacemaker’s path, as seen from the Aaron and Rabbi Meir stories, involves the development of pious or moral character worthy of respect, the conscious creation of role models of peacemaking, purposeful acts of humility that sometimes involve personal sacrifices or loss of face, active or empathetic listening, a method of helping people work through destructive emotions, and finally, the gift of abundant if not unlimited time.4

Regarding a story from the later rabbinic literature describing Aaron as a peacemaker in the context of healing religious-secular conflicts in Israel, Gopin writes that “working with these traditions interpretatively . . . could both stimulate the creation of indigenous conflict resolution methods and simultaneously offer a healing connection between Jews.”5 Gopin also advocates for establishing conflict resolution training that would be grounded in the mitzva (commandment) to “seek peace, and pursue it” (Ps. 34:15).6

I vividly recall reading these sections of his book and being simultaneously inspired and bewildered. Inspired because I felt these lines were speaking to

me and I wanted to do my part as a scholar-practitioner of Jewish conflict resolution; bewildered because I recall thinking, “That’s it? In all of rabbinic literature there are only two stories of rabbinic peacemaking?” I knew then that this was what I wanted to write my PhD dissertation on.

It turns out, though, that this would not be a simple task. I recall writing to one of my Talmud professors at Hebrew University, Prof. Menachem Kahana, about the idea of writing my dissertation on this topic. He responded by remarking that Prof. Saul Lieberman, the famous twentieth-century Talmud scholar, was known to say that the well-known rabbinic dictum “Torah scholars increase peace in the world” (Berakhot 19a) is proof that the rabbis had a sense of humor.7

I was determined to prove that rabbis don’t have a sense of humor!

Over the next several years, I went through an incalculable amount of rabbinic literature representing many generations of scholarship, as well as conducted countless word searches in various databases (such as the BarIlan Responsa Project) looking for phrases that might lead me to cases of people involved in conflict resolution either as third parties or as a side in the conflict—but with little success. (Only one story from that period of research eventually found its way into this book, along with the Aaron and the Rabbi Meir stories mentioned by Gopin.) I had even considered interviewing contemporary rabbis to see how they serve as third parties in conflicts.

A major breakthrough finally came when I came across the term pius, “reconciliation.” This inspired me to search for examples in rabbinic literature where rabbis or laypeople would either reconcile between conflicting sides or reconcile with others with whom they were in conflict. Later, I came across other terms and concepts I had never heard of, such as pashranim (compromisers), metavehkei shalom (mediators of peace), and finally, rodfei shalom (pursuers of peace). I had heard of a rodef shalom (pursuer of peace) in the singular, in the rabbinic description of Aaron, but never in the plural, rodfei shalom.

I eventually returned to Prof. Steinberg and proceeded to write my PhD dissertation at Bar-Ilan University, under the incredible supervision of Prof. Moshe Rossman, who had been teaching courses on conflict resolution and early modern Jewish history at the Bar-Ilan Conflict Resolution, Management and Negotiation Graduate Program since its inception. The title of my dissertation was “The Tradition of Aaron the Pursuer of Peace between People as a Rabbinic Model of Reconciliation,” and my academic research question was, To what extent does the legend describing Aaron as

a pursuer of peace between individuals indeed represent the rabbinic model of reconciliation?8 To answer this question I compared the rabbinic legend of Aaron as a pursuer of peace to other cultural models of third-party reconciliation, such as the Arab-Islamic sulha process. I also compared it to other rabbinic legends I had found telling of rabbis serving as third-party peacemakers or as reconciling with others they were in conflict with. Finally, I examined the legend of Aaron in light of Jewish laws pertaining to thirdparty peacemaking and reconciliation or forgiveness between individuals.

Toward the end of 2011, as I was submitting the final draft of my dissertation, two things happened. First, I came across a doctoral dissertation called “Traditional Jewish Perspectives on Peace and Interpersonal Conflict Resolution,” by Rabbi Dr. Howard Kaminsky.9 My heart stopped. However, as I eagerly worked my way through this incredibly thorough work, and later when I spoke with its author on the phone, I understood that Kaminsky limited the scope of his research to models of conflict resolution that did not involve a third party. In fact, at the end of his dissertation he writes, “The next stage of research, which would logically flow as a corollary to this study, would be an analysis of Jewish perspectives on interpersonal conflict resolution that does involve a third party.”10 Phew! I then proceeded to rework about a dozen footnotes pertaining to areas where our research overlapped, but the main body of my research, which pertained to third parties, was not made superfluous.

Second, Prof. Robert Eisen of George Washington University, who was one of my dissertation readers, gave me the following advice, after sharing his comments for changes on my dissertation: “Make your book about the ‘mediator’ in Jewish tradition. What role does the mediator play in dispute resolution in Judaism? This way you can basically keep everything you have, but take some of the weight off the Aaron tradition.” Book?! I could still barely get my head around finishing my dissertation!

A few years later, though, I decided to take Prof. Eisen’s advice, but it did not include “keeping everything” I had. Refocusing my book to be about only third-party peacemakers required me to drop about 50% of my dissertation and to research about 50% new material. I began reading up on religious and traditional cultural models of conflict resolution in general, and those regarding third parties (thanks in part to my international graduate students) in particular. In light of a complaint I justifiably received from several of my female graduate students, I searched through early rabbinic literature for potential examples of women serving as third parties. I also looked

for more examples of laypeople serving as peacemakers. A graduate student of mine, Rabbi Dr. Offer Ashual, referred me to a letter he had come across of a seventeenth-century traveler to Safed, Palestine, describing third-party lay peacemaking, while a former professor of mine from Hebrew University, Prof. Robert Brody, referred me to a tenth-century story of a well-respected layperson named Bishr b. (son of) Aaron making peace between two powerful rabbis in Babylonia.

Yet the biggest breakthrough came one late night while sitting with my friend Hanan Benayahu. I shared with him how incredibly difficult it was to find stories of rabbis serving as mediators or peacemakers. He stood up walked over to the floor-to-ceiling bookcases in his study and handed me a stack of books that his late father, the famous professor of early-modern Jewish history, Meir Benayahu, had written. He assured me that I was bound to find examples there, especially in the travel diary of Rabbi Hayim Yosef David Azulai, about whom his father wrote a seminal, two-volume book. As I stayed up that night reading through the fascinating travel diary of this eighteenth-century rabbi, I knew that Hanan had just handed me the missing pieces needed for writing my book.

However, as opposed to my doctoral dissertation, I did not want to write a book strictly about text and theory. I wanted to include implications for the practice of third-party peacemaking today as well—in particular, reflections on my own experiences using many of the cases of third-party peacemakers featured in this book in various conflict resolution trainings, educational programs, academic courses, and actual conflict situations.

At more or less the same time I had formally started my doctoral research, I began teaching what I had learned at the Pardes Institute of Jewish Studies, where I had already been teaching Bible and Talmud for several years. In 2009 I created the Peace and Conflict Track at Pardes,11 which integrated Jewish text with conflict resolution theory and hosted lectures by conflict resolution practitioners. Two years later, through the encouragement of a few idealistic students of mine, and as part of being a senior research fellow at Marc Gopin’s Center for World Religions, Diplomacy, and Conflict Resolution (CRDC) at George Mason University, the Peace and Conflict Track morphed into the Pardes Center for Judaism and Conflict Resolution (PCJCR).12

The original mission statement of the new center was “to create a global network of rodfei shalom, uniting individuals and communities across personal, political, and religious divides around the shared values of Judaism and conflict resolution.” This began with a mini-course called “The Rodef

Shalom in Judaism” taught by Pardes alumni in synagogues and on campuses in various cities around the United States; an online version of the course cotaught by Marc Gopin and me; and a culminating national retreat.13

Between 2012 and 2019, the center offered three main programs: (1) The Pardes Rodef Shalom Schools Program, which engaged roughly thirty Jewish middle schools in the United States, and included teacher training and coaching as well as a seven-unit curriculum for students; (2) The Pardes Rodef Shalom Communities Program, which focused on American community rabbis and top Jewish lay leaders from different denominations, offering retreats, resources, and cohort programs; and (3) The 9AdarProject: Jewish Week of Constructive Conflict, which the center created as an awareness week around the Jewish value of “Disagreements for the Sake of Heaven,” commemorating the tragic events some 2,000 years ago when the two dominant rabbinic schools of thought ceased to disagree constructively and instead engaged in a violent clash over how open or closed to be toward nonJews in general, and making war or peace with Rome in particular.14

The following statement was the foundation of two Rodef Shalom programs:

The rodef shalom is a rabbinic model of a Jewish peacemaker who pursues peace between individuals, families, and communities. Throughout Jewish history, there were people known in their communities as rodfei shalom. Today, to be a rodef shalom means to be mindful in seeking to understand, respect, and assist in constructively balancing conflicting needs and perspectives, between individuals and communities, in the spirit of mahloket leshem Shamayim (disagreements for the sake of Heaven).

In the beginning of 2019, I transitioned from my position at Pardes to become the director of Mosaica’s Religious Peace Initiative, under the guidance of its founder and president, Rabbi Michael Melchior.15 Mosaica is an Israeli NGO that seeks to cultivate a culture of conflict resolution, dialogue, and consensus building among individuals, families, communities, cultures, and religions through developing, implementing, and disseminating models of third-party intervention. Mosaica is devised of two branches: The Religious Peace Initiative and The Center for Conflict Resolution by Agreement. The Religious Peace Initiative is a strategic network of religious leaders who serve together behind the scenes as “insider mediators” advancing religious peace in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict and mitigating life-threatening

crisis situations as they arise using their existing, extensive network of relationships. The Center for Conflict Resolution by Agreement supports several professional programs of conflict resolution, dialogue, and consensus building, often through Israeli government tenders. One of these programs, “Tochnit Gishurim” (Network of Community Mediation Centers Project), is an Israeli government tender of The Ministry of Labor, Social Affairs, and Social Services and has been operated by Mosaica for nearly 15 years. The program currently helps support a national network of 47 Community Mediation and Dialogue Centers and 20 initiatives (that are in the process of becoming centers), which includes over 1000 active volunteer community mediators throughout all of Israeli society. My experience at Mosaica working closely with senior Jewish and Islamic leaders who serve as “insider religious mediators”, as well as with the community mediation centers, has been an extremely formative experience. The more I personally have had the opportunity to engage in the practice of mediation and third-party peacemaking the more I understand and appreciate the many texts and theories I write about in this book.

In addition to my work at Pardes, and Mosaica, I have also had the opportunity to teach many of the cases in this book in academic graduate courses. Since completing my PhD, I have taught several hundred Israeli graduate students from all sectors of society (secular Jews, religious Zionists, Arabs, and even some ultra-Orthodox Jews). Moreover, I have taught many of these cases to several hundred non-Jewish international students from literally all over the world as part of courses I have taught at Tel Aviv University’s International Program in Conflict Resolution and Mediation;16 at BarIlan University’s International Summer Program, Identity Based Conflict Resolution;17 and at Hebrew University’s summer program, Religion in the Holy Land: Faith’s Role in Peace and Conflict.18 Teaching these stories to graduate students from all over Israel and from China, India, Africa, North America, Europe, South America, and elsewhere has taught me a tremendous amount about their own religious and cultural models of peacemaking— which in turn has better informed me with regard to how I relate to the various cases presented on these pages.

This book, therefore, is the sum total of both my textual and my theoretical research, as well as that of my experiences in practically applying much of this research over the past nearly twenty years.

Daniel Roth Jerusalem, February 2021

Acknowledgments

As I noted in the Preface, I am deeply indebted and grateful to numerous teachers, colleagues, and friends who played a central role in the story behind this book.

First and foremost, my thanks go to Rabbi Dr. Marc Gopin, whose writing not only was the inspiration for my research, but who also played a critical role in encouraging and advising me over the years of writing this book. Dr. Gopin also mentored me regarding how to bridge theory with practice and bring the book alive through actually engaging in the practice of religious peacebuilding. Dr. Rob Eisen, who in addition to strongly encouraging me to write this book, invested endless amounts of time and energy reading over the complete manuscript and offering invaluable comments and guidance during our havruta (study partner) sessions.

I want to thank my professors at Bar-Ilan University’s Conflict Resolution, Management and Negotiation Graduate Program, and in particular, my PhD advisor, Prof. Moshe Rosman, who challenged me to think deeper about how to integrate text with conflict resolution theory. Especial thanks are due as well to Professors Gerald Steinberg, Michal Alberstein, and Ephraim Tabory, who served as the directors of the program over the years and supported me in completing this book.

My deepest thanks also go to the leadership of the Pardes Institute of Jewish Studies, Rabbi Leon Morris, Dr. David Bernstein and Joel Weiss, who not only supported my work in the Pardes Center for Judaism and Conflict Resolution (PCJCR) over the years, but also encouraged and enabled me to take the necessary time to sit and write this book. I also want to thank Elisheva Blum, who was the Assistant Director of the PCJCR, without whose professionalism and friendship I never would have been able to reach the finish line.

I want to express my deepest gratitude and admiration to the senior leadership of Mosaica for giving me the opportunity to apply the texts and theories of this book into practice. Rabbi Michael Melchior, the President of Mosaica, through his daily instruction and modeling to me of what it actually means to be a rabbinic peacemaker in practice, in particular in advancing religious

peace and mitigating crisis situations in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. And Nurit Bachrach, the CEO of Mosaica, who has introduced and connected me to the ever growing movement of community mediation and dialogue centers in Israel, which are the contemporary equivalent of the lay third-party peacemaking traditions discussed in this book.

Several friends and colleagues played a role in offering advice, encouragement, and comments. They include Hanan Benayahu, Dr. Pinchas Roth, Dr. Offer Ashual, Dr. Yehudah Galinsky, Dovid Jacob, Emanuel Cohn, and of course Rabbi Dr. Howard Kaminsky, whose own book on Judaism and conflict resolution served as the standard-bearer I wished to come close to.

A special thanks to my friend Micah Selya, a Torah scribe, for the beautiful cover art of Rabbi Hayim Palagi’s call to establish community volunteer rodfei shalom (pursuers of peace).

I want to acknowledge and thank Dr. Jenny Labendz and Deena Nataf, each of whom played a critical role in helping review and edit various drafts of this book over the years.

Thank you to the many students I have had the privilege of teaching over the years, from the Pardes Institute and from the graduate programs at BarIlan University, Tel Aviv University, and the Hebrew University. My students both studied and argued with me over many of the texts discussed in this book, and read various early sections, offering important insights and comments from which I learned so much.

Many thanks to Cynthia Read and the entire Oxford University Press editing staff, who have done more to advance academic literature on religious peacebuilding than any other academic press. It is a great honor to have my book join this important list of publications.

Finally, I want to express my deepest gratitude for the strong, loving support of my family: my mother, Marsha Roth, for her years of support, love, encouragement, and devotion; my children, Uriel, Rachel, Hadas, and Eden, who were very patient over the many years I spent researching and writing this book, celebrating each milestone with me along the way; and most of all, my closest advisor, friend, lawyer, and wife, Leora. There are simply no words to express my gratitude for all that she has done to support me throughout every point in this long journey.

I dedicated this book in memory of my late father, Larry Roth, who was a real mensch and natural rodef shalom (pursuer of peace), and whose image was truly the guiding inspiration for all the research behind this book.

Introduction

Terms and Methodology

The goal of this book is to present an array of case studies featuring thirdparty peacemakers, sometimes referred to as rodfei shalom (literally, pursuers of peace), found within Jewish rabbinic literature that can serve as important textual inspirations and historical precedents necessary for fostering indigenous Jewish practices of third-party peacemaking and mediation today. This is not a history book of third-party peacemakers tracing historical developments from one time period to the next, but rather a study organized around typologies of third-party peacemakers found within rabbinic literature.

The book seeks to build upon and expand the academic study of both religious and traditional cultural models of conflict resolution, and as such is primarily geared toward scholars interested in the interplay between religion, culture, and conflict resolution/peacebuilding. However, as I have attempted to bridge theory and practice, it is also my intention that rabbis, educators, and laypeople as well as conflict resolution practitioners will find within these pages critical sources of inspiration and wisdom for working in the practical field of third-party peacemaking and mediation today. Furthermore, since many of the cases of third-party peacemakers presented in this book have not previously been explored by Judaic studies scholars, or at least not from within the context of conflict resolution studies, it is also my intention that this book contribute to the vast area of Judaic studies as well.

I chose the term “third-party peacemaker” for this book in order to allow for a broad and fluid understanding of the roles a third party can play in intervening in a conflict situation. This includes the role of mediator, in which the third party works together with both sides in conflict for the purpose of bringing them to a mutually agreed-upon, noncoercive compromise agreement; the role of reconciler, where regardless of whether or not there is a formal agreement solving the problem between the sides, the third party reconciles between them and helps them reestablish and heal their relationship; the role of equalizer, in which the third party uses its status to bring Third-Party Peacemakers in Judaism. Daniel Roth, Oxford University

the sides in conflict to the table to ultimately make peace; the role of coach, advising one of the sides how best to engage in the conflict; the role of angerabsorber; and the role of guarantor to keep the peace and make sure it holds up. I am defining all these third-party roles and processes as “peacemaking.”1 I am not including in this definition examples in which rabbis served as arbitrators to ultimately enforce a ruling upon two conflicting sides. However, as we shall see, the lines between mediation and arbitration are not always as clear as they are perceived to be in modern-Western contexts.2

All the case studies of third-party peacemakers explored in this book are found, as noted earlier, in rabbinic literature. By this I am referring to the broadest definition of the term, which includes both classical rabbinic literature, such as Mishna, Talmud, and Midrash (200–1000 ce), and medieval and early-modern rabbinic literature (1000–1850 ce). For the vast majority of Jews today, rabbinic Judaism, which aligns itself with both the Written Law (i.e., the Bible) and the Oral Law (i.e., rabbinic tradition and interpretation), even if radically reinterpreted or rejected, still represents the normative corpus of religious Jewish literature over the ages (as opposed to, e.g., Karaite Judaism, which rejected the Oral Law). Within this large body of literature there are many laws and interpretations of laws and customs that prescribe how one should behave. There are also many legends that describe how famous people supposedly behaved, which also serve as important sources of inspiration for how people should behave. And finally, there are accounts of historical events that tell of how people actually behaved.

The majority of the book will focus on thirty-six case studies of third-party peacemakers found in rabbinic literature from the third to the nineteenth centuries. At the ends of Chapters 2, 3, 4, and 5, there are summary tables, which present the cases examined in that chapter according to the case number (1–36). Throughout the book, I will frequently be referring back to these tables and case numbers. Each case study represents one example from rabbinic literature of a third party attempting to make peace between two conflicting parties. Some of the third parties, such as Aaron, will be the subject of more than one case (see Table 2.1, cases 1–4). Some case studies explore only the peacemaker and not the particular case (Table 4.1, case 15), and some describe a custom of third-party peacemaking germane to a particular community (Table 5.1, case 32; Table 5.2, case 33).

I have divided the book into five chapters. Chapter 1 is entitled “From Muhammad to Sulha: Religious and Traditional Cultural Models of

Third-Party Peacemaking,” and its goal is to establish the theoretical lens through which the case studies of third-party peacemakers in Judaism can be analyzed. I begin this chapter by reviewing the study of religion and peacebuilding in general, and Judaism and conflict resolution in particular. I then bring, as examples of research conducted in religious peacebuilding, paradigmatic peacemakers in other religious traditions, such as the prophet Muhammad in Islam. In the second part of the chapter, I survey the literature relating to traditional cultural models of conflict resolution and peacemaking, focusing on the traditional Arab-Islamic process of sulha and how it compares to modern-Western models of conflict resolution and reconciliation. This chapter concludes with Table 1, which compares the sulha process to the Interactive Problem-Solving Workshops based on the ten theoretical questions for comparison outlined later in this section. These questions will serve as a point of comparison for all the subsequent case studies found in rabbinic literature presented in this book.

The four chapters within which the case studies are presented can be divided between Chapters 2 and 3, which present legends of third-party peacemakers found in the more authoritative, classical rabbinic literature; and Chapters 4 and 5, which feature historical accounts and stories of third-party peacemakers in medieval and early-modern rabbinic literature. This division does not come to suggest historical progress from the earlier rabbinic stratum to the later, but rather is a means to distinguish between the different types of case studies, namely, legends on the one hand, and historical case studies and stories (which I will define as hybrids between historical accounts and legends) on the other. Thus, the chapters move from most paradigmatic and legendary to least paradigmatic but most historical (often also comprising far more detail).

In light of this, Chapter 2 is entitled “Judaism’s Paradigmatic Third-Party Peacemaker: Legends of Aaron, the Pursuer of Peace, in Classical Rabbinic Literature.” There I explore the various legends of Aaron as the pursuer of peace in classical rabbinic literature. The first part of the chapter focuses on Aaron’s identity as the ideal peacemaker in Judaism, and the second part examines legends that tell of his peacemaking methods. But Aaron is not the only example of third-party peacemakers found in classical rabbinic literature, and in Chapter 3, “From Rabbi Meir to Beruria: Legends of ThirdParty Peacemakers in Classical Rabbinic Literature,” I present eight legends of third-party peacemakers, beginning with the case perhaps most similar to Aaron, that of Rabbi Meir, and ending with the case most different from

Aaron, that of the simple jesters. I also discuss two cases of women serving as third parties, which differ from all other examples of third-party peacemakers presented in this book, one of them being Beruria, the famous learned wife of Rabbi Meir.

In Chapters 4 and 5, I investigate historical accounts and stories of third-party peacemakers in medieval and early-modern rabbinic literature. Chapter 4, “From Rabbi Yosef Syracusty to Rabbi Nissi alNahrawani: Historical Accounts and Stories of Third-Party Rabbinic Peacemakers in Medieval and Early-Modern Rabbinic Literature,” focuses on cases of rabbis who served as third-party peacemakers. I distinguish between those of high social status who succeeded in their peacemaking efforts and those of lower social status who were less successful peacemakers. Afterward, I discuss exceptions to this distinction, and the correlation between status and success. In Chapter 5, “Rodfei Shalom, Metavkhei Shalom, Pashranim, and Nikhbadim: Historical Accounts and Stories of Third-Party Lay Peacemakers in Medieval and Early-Modern Rabbinic Literature,” I focus primarily on historical accounts of lay leaders serving as third-party peacemakers in historical Jewish communities.

In the Conclusion, entitled “The Text, Theory, Practice, and Scope of Third-Party Peacemakers in Judaism,” I outline certain conceptual and theoretical common trends and variations of third-party peacemakers in Judaism and their relationship to other religious and traditional models. I also reflect on further implications and directions for future studies and practical applications.

The cases described in this book consist of legends (Chaps. 2 and 3) and historical accounts and stories (Chaps. 4 and 5). The Cambridge Dictionary defines the word legend as “a very old story or set of stories from ancient times, or the stories, not always true, that people tell about a famous event or person.” Legends, while they may not always be completely true, play an important role in the cultural and ethical teachings of a particular group. Within the parameters of rabbinic literature, I am identifying as “legends” all cases found in classical rabbinic literature. This includes the cases found in Aggada (Table 3.1, cases 5–10; Table 3.2, cases 11–14), often translated as rabbinic legend literature, as well as all early rabbinic portrayals of Aaron as the paradigmatic peacemaker (Tables 2.1, 2.2).

The second category of case studies can be identified as historical accounts. According to the Cambridge Dictionary, the word account means “a written or spoken description of an event.” Therefore, by historical accounts, I am

referring to all cases that are found in firsthand reports of particular historical events. These historical accounts of third-party peacemaking were preserved mostly in legal queries, known as rabbinic responsa literature, sent to rabbis describing local communal conflicts (Table 4.3, cases 24–26; Table 5.1, cases 28–32; Table 5.2, cases 34–35). There are also cases found in rabbinic travel diaries or letters written by travelers (Table 4.2, cases 18–23; Table 5.2, case 33). While these accounts clearly also contain within them storytelling by the author, since they are nevertheless firsthand accounts of particular events, I am identifying them as historical.

There are several cases that do not fit neatly into either of these categories, which I will refer to simply as “stories.” This is because they were written about events or people that the rabbinic authors did not witness firsthand but which had taken place either in the author’s lifetime or a generation or two before. These stories may be historical, but they also contain elements within them that may not be completely factual, such as glamorizing the hero of the story or ascribing miraculous powers to him; in this case they are closer to being legends. In this hybrid category I am including cases found in medieval and early-modern rabbinic historiographical works (Table 4.1, case 17; Table 4.3, case 26; Table 5.2, case 36), as well as in early-modern rabbinic books that recorded the story in the context of teaching a spiritual or ethical lesson (Table 4.1, cases 15–16).

In addition to exploring the case studies of third-party peacemakers, I have made a point to discuss all areas of Jewish law as they pertain to third-party peacemaking, either as part of my analysis of the various case studies or as separate, introductory chapter sections in Chapters 4 and 5 that explore the Jewish imperative for rabbis and laypeople to be third-party peacemakers.

The three primary questions to be explored in Chapters 2–5 are: (1) Who are the various third-party peacemakers found in rabbinic text, and what are their methods of peacemaking? (2) How do they compare to each other and to other religious and traditional cultural models of third-party peacemaking, which can shed light on the theoretical model of the case study? (3) What are the practical implications of these cases for peacemaking today? Consequently, my methodology for analyzing each of the thirty-six case studies is based on three layers of analysis: text, theory, and practice.

The first layer, text—the raw material to be analyzed in this book—consists of rabbinic legends and historical accounts. One must do a close textual, historical, and literary analysis of these difficult ancient texts and the stories preserved within them. This includes studying the various manuscripts and

parallel versions of each textual case study. It also includes taking into account previous academic scholarship that may have analyzed these texts from a historical or literary perspective. However, as already noted, many of the cases presented in the book are being critically analyzed for the first time as part of this study. Since this can at times be tedious and exhausting for the reader, even one who is not a neophyte with regard to rabbinic literature, I have done my best to present only the necessary textual and historical information needed to appreciate and understand the case at hand.3

With regard to the case studies found in classical rabbinic literature (Chaps. 2 and 3) that I have identified as legends, it is also critical to include in this layer of textual analysis how these primary textual legends were interpreted by later rabbinic commentaries over the generations. (This differs from the historical case studies [Chaps. 4 and 5], which did not merit rabbinic commentaries.) Since the goal of analyzing these legends is so that they can serve as inspirations for third-party peacemaking today, it is essential to explore how they were understood by later rabbis in subsequent generations; this creates an important body of wisdom in its own right with significance for practical application today.

The second layer of analysis is to delineate the theoretical model of thirdparty peacemaking embedded within the thirty-six cases of legends and historical accounts by comparing them to other models of third-party peacemaking found in both Jewish literature and other religious and traditional models of conflict resolution. In order to do this, I have outlined ten questions that will serve as categories for theoretical comparison throughout the book: (1) What is the conflict, including its roots, and what is the identity of the conflicting sides, as well as the relationship and power dynamics between, the sides in conflict? (2) What is the identity of the third-party peacemakers, how many are intervening, and what can be learned from this number regarding the cultural model of peacemaking? (3) What is the social status of the third-party peacemakers, and how respected are they by the sides and by the community at large? (4) How strongly is the third party connected to and familiar with the sides in conflict? (5) Who takes the initiative to intervene: the third party, the community at large, or one or both of the sides in conflict? (6) Does the third party meet with each side separately, going back and forth between them, or does everyone meet together? (7) Does the third party attempt to bring the sides in conflict to a formal compromise agreement that in essence resolves the material aspects of the dispute? (8) Does the third party attempt to transform the perceptions of each side, restore

damaged honor, and, ultimately, reconcile their relationship, and if so, how? (9) Does the third party undergo any personal self-sacrifice for the purpose of making peace? And finally, (10) what is the result of the third party’s intervention? Has the peacemaker succeeded in making peace and reconciling the sides, or did he or they fail? What factors may have contributed to the success or failure of the intervention? Only in the minority of the cases will all ten questions be answered, yet having all of them as a basis for comparison is essential for the theoretical comparisons (see Tables 1–5).

The final layer of analysis relates to the potential practical implications of these case studies to serve as indigenous Jewish models of peacemaking today, and in particular for conflict resolution training and educational programs.4 Consequently, at the end of several of the sections throughout this book, I will add a short addendum called “Practical implications for thirdparty peacemaking today.” In these short excursions, I will share reflections based on my personal experiences using these cases in various settings for over fifteen years in educational programs, conflict resolution trainings, academic courses, and practical fieldwork.

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook