’sIntroduction
Inthelatespringof1954,apromisingOxfordundergraduatewasworking hardfortheHertfordscholarship(themainprizetheninLatinstudies).He neededsomeextratuitionforLatincomposition,buthistutoratPembroke Collegewasrecoveringfromaseriousillnessanddirectedhimto ‘afriendat StJohn’ s ’.Thislatter
ononeoccasion ... didwhatIgatherhisoldtutoratBalliol(RogerMynors)used todo,andputbeforeme,afterdiscussingmycompositions,apieceofunfamiliar Latin:somethingfromtheElderSeneca.Inotedinmydiaryfor4June: ‘Inthe eveningIreadaboutRomandeclamation.’¹
TheOxfordstudent tallandslim,withmildbutpiercingblueeyes was obviouslyM(ichael)W(interbottom).HistutoratStJohn’sCollegewas,also obviously,DonaldRussell;andthesparkhelitinhispupilwastorevolutionize awhole fieldofstudy.
MW’sdoctoralthesiswasacommentaryonQuintilian,BookTwo:akey partofthe Institutio inmattersofrhetoricaltraining.Theworkwassuccessfullydefendedin1962,²butremainedunpublishedformorethanfortyyears: MWwasbynowdevotinghisenergiestoanewOCTeditionofQuintilian. Heproducedit withastonishingspeedandskill,consideringthebulkofhis task in1970,togetherwithacompanionvolumeof ProblemsinQuintilian, andafterastringofpreliminarystudies.Thisearlysetofpublicationsimmediatelycommandedpraiseandrespect.ItfullyillustratesMW’ s ‘holistic’ view ofscholarship:researchonthemanuscripttradition(includingitshuman subjects,e.g.Almeloveen)istightlyintertwinednotonlywiththeeditingofa text,butalsowithaconstantefforttoelucidateandcontextualizewhatthat text means.Withhischaracteristiccandour,MWhasrecentlysummarized hiscreed:
Eversincechildhood,Ihavealwaysbeenconcernedtounderstandthe meaning of whatIread,andIamnotmuchtroubledwhenIamtoldbycriticsthattheAuthor isdeadandhismeaningamatterfortheReadertodecide.Ifeelinmynaïveway thatclassicalprosewritersmeantsomethingdefinitebywhattheywrote,and that,ifIdonotunderstandit,thatiseithermyfaultorthatofthescribes.³
¹Winterbottom perlitteras (28August2017).²Seeherep.218n.[3]. ³Winterbottom(2017c),403(myitalics).Forallabbreviationsseethegeneralbibliography below,pp.35161;articlesandchaptersreprintedinthisbookarereferredtoas A.1, A.2 ... , bookreviewsas R.1,R.2 ForfulldetailsofMW’spublicationsalludedtothroughoutthese pages,seethecompletelistbelow,pp.
QuintilianwouldneversubsequentlyfadefromMW’shorizon;norwouldthe LatintextsoftheAnglo-SaxonMiddleAges,theobject sinceMW’searly years notofasideinterestbutofawhole ‘parallelcareer’,deservingasurvey initsownright.⁴ Bytheearly1970s,however,MW(thenTutorialFellowin classicsatWorcesterCollege,Oxford[1967–92])wasworkingintensivelyin the fieldthathadarousedhisinterestsincehisundergraduatedays:declamation.Thestudyof Roman declamation,inparticular,wasnotsomuch dormantasnearlynon-existentinthoseyears.Thetextsthemselveswereoften barelyintelligible:someoftherelevanteditions(anyexplicitmentionmay charitablybedispensedwith)wereamongthemostdefectivethatclassical scholarshiphaseverproduced;andonlyafewaidswereavailableforthe interpretationofthegenre(mostnotablyStanleyBonner’ severgreen Roman Declamation (1949)).Adrasticandbeneficialchangewaseffectedbyfour greatscholars:LennartHåkanson,DonaldRussell,D.R.ShackletonBailey, andMW;by1989,thankstothem, first-rateeditionsofallthemaintextsin the fieldofRomandeclamation,andabetterunderstandingofthewhole genre,wereatlastathand.
UnlikeHåkansonandShackletonBailey,MWdidnotconcentratehiswork indeclamation ‘only’ onecdotictasks:hisElderSenecaforLoeb(1974),and themassivecommentaryaccompanyinghiseditionofthe ‘ Quintilianic’ MinorDeclamations (1984),splendidlyshowcasehisgiftfordeepandclear elucidation evenofthemostdifficultandcorrupttexts.Inthesameyears,in anumberofseminalpapershesetouttoshedfreshlightontherelationship betweenrhetoricalprecepts(Quintilian ’ s inprimis )ontheonehand, declamatorytheoryandpracticeontheother;andinRussell’ sfootstepshe investigatedtheinteractionbetweenGreekandRomandeclamation thebook onSopatros(1988,withDoreenInnes)beingthelargest,butbynomeansthe only,productofthiseffort.Whatisreallystriking,throughouttheseresearches, isMW’sunprecedentedbreadthofview.Hehaswrittenondeclamationfrom GorgiasuptoEnnodius,singlingout(mostlyforthe firsttime)constantsand variablesoverthecenturies.Thishehasdonethankstohisadmirablelearning, butalsotohisbeingimmunetoallthestockassumptionswhichwouldhave hamperedprogress.Seeforinstancehiswordsonthe ‘earlystages’ ofdeclamationinRome:
Itwasnotthatdeclamationsomehowbecamemoreimportantinthecourse ofthe firstcentury .Ourimpressionthatitdoesislargelyadelusion,re sultingfromtheaccidentsofourevidence.DeclamationwillhavecometoRome withtheGreekteacherswhobroughtrhetoricthereinthesecondcentury [It]didnotincreaseinimportanceinthe firstcentury:itmerely remained
⁴ ThiswillbegiveninavolumecontainingaselectionofMW’smedievalpapers,tobeedited byRobertoGamberiniandpublishedbySISMEL(Florence).
important,andperhapsbecame,inschoolslessausterethanQuintilian’ s,more extravagantinconception.⁵
WithoutMW’swork,ourwholeunderstandingofancientdeclamationwould nowbemuchmorenarrowandsuperficial.
Betweenthe1970sandthe1990s,theindefatigablescholar inspiteofhis evergrowingteachingduties,towhichweoweavaluableanthologyof Roman Declamation (1980) foundtimeforfundamentalresearchinvariousother domains.Firstofall,heconsolidatedhisreputationasaspecialistinmanuscripttraditionsandcriticaleditions,withhisOCTtextsofTacitus(Opera minora,1975)andCicero(Deofficiis,1994).Thiswas ‘obviously’ accompaniedbyanumberofpapersandbookreviews(onwhichlatterseebelow);but specialmentionshouldbemadeofthemanyentriesMWwroteforthe standardworkon TextsandTransmission editedbyLeightonReynoldsin 1983.Fordecadesnow,astudent’ s firstapproachtothetextualtraditionof manyaRomanauthororworkhas beneficially been,moreoftenthannot, oneoftheadmirablesurveyscontributedbyMWtothisbook.
Ancientliterarycriticismisanotherrecurrent fieldofstudyforMW: theanthologieshepreparedwithDonaldRussellhavefullydeservedtobe standardsincetheirpublication(1972,1989).Moreoccasional butnoless serious interesthasbeenlavishedonanumberofauthors,mostlyfortextual andexegeticalissues:Virgil inprimis,butalsoLucretius,Ovid,Apuleius, Cyprian,Ambrose Andthemedievalfavouriteshavealwaysbeenthereof course,withWilliamofMalmesburyinthefrontrow.
MeanwhileMWwasappointedCorpusChristiProfessorofLatinatOxford (1992),atributetohisrankamongtheleadinglivingclassicists.In2000,one yearbeforehisretirement,thepresentwriter(verytimidly)contactedhim,to involvehimintheCassinoprojectofre-editingthe19 MajorDeclamations ascribedtoQuintilianinindividualvolumes,withtranslationandcommentary(1999–).MWdeclinedtakingononeormoredeclamationshimself,but generouslyacceptedtocommentonthesinglevolumes.Theamountand qualityofhiscontributionstoeachbookinthiscollection(from2005on)call forspecialemphasis.Itisveryoften ‘Winterbottom perlitteras’ who finally healsorgivessensetoapassagevexedforcenturies,throughouttheseexceptionallydifficulttexts.
Allthesame,the Maiores remainedforseveralyearsonlyasideinterestfor MW;butingeneral,declamationandancientrhetoricaltexts(withtheir teachingprocedures)cametotheforefrontofhisscholarshipasaclassicist⁶ throughoutthe2000s anactivitymoreintensivethaneversincehis
⁵ Winterbottom(1982),254 6(= A.5 below,pp.789);myitalics.
⁶ Noidlequalification:inthesameyears,MW’ s ‘medievalself ’ (Freudmighthavetalkedof a Doppelgänger)publishesnolessthan fivebooksandseventeenarticlesandanenormous numberofbookreviews.
x Editor’sIntroduction
retirement.In2006arevisedversionofhisD.Phil.dissertationonQuintilian, BookTwowas finallypublishedasabook(incollaborationwithTobias Reinhardt);in2008hismajorcontributiontothemonumentalcommentary onCicero’ s Deoratore (begunbyLeemanandPinkster)appeared;andhis papersovertheseyearsdisplayanincreasinglywiderrangeofissuesand approaches.Morewillbesaidonthispresently;hereIshouldpointout MW’scommitmenttotherecoveryandpublicationofthe Nachlass ofhis friend,thegreatSwedishscholarLennartHåkanson,whotragicallydiedinhis primein1987.⁷
NothinghasbeensaidsofarofanotherhallmarkofMW’sscholarship: hiscountlessbookreviews.Overthedecades,theyalldemonstrateanunprejudiced andsometimesmemorable⁸—candourinassessingthereviewed author’smeritsandshortcomings:somethingquitehardtocomeby,these days.Whatismore,theyalwaysoffersomeacutenewinsighttothereader: bothonthespecificsubjectofthebookunderreview,andonbroader ecdotic,mostoften methodologicalissues.MW’ s ‘collectedreviewswould serveinthemselvesasamanualofediting’,MichaelReevewrotesomeyears ago;⁹ fewwilldisagree.
Visàvis suchabroadandvariedarrayofpublications,thisbookoffersa selectionofpapersfromtwoespeciallyrepresentativeandintrinsicallyconnected fieldsofinterest.Thechoiceisprimarilybased,ofcourse,onthe scholarly ‘weight’ ofthesingleitems;buttheplaceandcircumstancesof publicationhavealsoplayedarole:manyofMW’smostacutecontributions originallyappearedinconferenceproceedings, Festschriften,andrareperiodicals oftenhardto findeveninleadinglibraries orembeddedinreviews thatevenmodernsearchtoolsmayeasilymiss.Itseemedappropriatetogive specialconsiderationtosuchmaterials.
Theauthorhasobviouslytakenpartintheselectionprocess.Hedecided thatanyitemsonQuintilian’stextandtransmissionpriortohisedition (1970)should not beincluded,forthateditiontookfullaccountofthem;and heexcludedanynon-specialistpieces.¹⁰ Whatthisbook does include,asfor Quintilian,arepaperson somekeyaspectsofthe Institutiooratoria regarding morals,style,structure,rhetoricaltechnicalities, auctores (A.1,3,5,8,9,13,18); andthemorerecentcontributionsonQuintilian’stext(A.15, 19; R.2–4, 7–8).
⁷ Onthisdemandingenterprise,carriedout enéquipe,seetheeditors’ prefacesinHåkanson (2014)and(2016).MWhasprovidedasensibleappraisalofHåkanson’sscholarship(in Håkanson(2016), ),andhashimselfbroughttopublicationthemostcomplicatedpiece ofhis Nachlass (HåkansonWinterbottom(2015)).
⁸ Cf.e.g.theopeningwordsofWinterbottom(1978),685(= R.3 below,p.322): ‘Thesetwo volumes followcloselyuponthe first,andtheysharethemeritsanddemeritsoftheir predecessor.Thetextmakesnopretensiontonovelty.Thetranslationis fluentandgenerally accurate.Thenotesareinformative.Theapparatuscriticusisadisaster.’ ⁹ Reeve(2000),204n.51.¹⁰ SuchasWinterbottom(1985)and(1997).
Inthe fieldofGreekandRomandeclamation,thisbookismoreinclusive. Onlyafewitemshavebeenleftout,mostlylongpapersinvolvingtextual (re-)editions.¹¹Allotherrelevantarticlesandreviewshavebeenreprinted here,onauthorsandtopicsrangingfromclassicalGreecetotheLatinMiddle Ages(A.2,4,6–8,14,16,20–3;R.1,5–6,9–12);roomhasbeenmadealsofor theintroductiontothe1988bookonSopatros(A.10):thisimpressively learnedandwide-rangingpiecemakesindispensablereadingforanyone workingonancientdeclamation.Finally,theoverallscopeofthevolume suggestedtheinclusionoftwoimportantshortpapersonrhetoricalterms andconcepts(A.11–12);andabrilliantsurveyofsomestrikingnoveltieson theancientrhetoricalcurriculum(A.17).
ThosewhoarefamiliarwithMW’sscholarshipmaywonderifoneofhis basictenetshasbeengivensufficientconsiderationinthisbook:
Ihaveafewrigidprinciplesinlife,butoneisnevertospeakorwriteonaLatin subjectwithoutmentioningproserhythm.¹²
Nospecificarticleorbookreviewonproserhythmisincludedhere,buteach selecteditemdoescontainatleastacaseinpoint,andsomepapersfeature detaileddiscussions.¹³Thosecrystal-clearpagesmakeoneregretthatMWhas morefrequentlyconfinedhimselftobriefmentions:hisluciditywouldhave beenparticularlywelcomeinthis field,asimportantasitisdifficult(and nowadaysneglected).
Allitemsareherereprintedaccordingtouniformeditorialguidelines,and intheprocessmisprintshavebeenremoved, OLD hasbeenreferredto throughoutaccordingtothesecondedition(2012),afewformaladjustments (e.g.incross-references)havebeenmade,andoccasionalclarificationsor referencestonewstandardeditionshavebeenentered(insquarebrackets).
Theauthorhasalsoworkedinanumberof addenda or corrigenda tosome papers,mostlyattheirend,whensomecrucialpointhadtobemadeora recentbibliographicalitemstoodoutforitsrelevance.Ingeneral,however,no attempthasbeenmadeatsystematicupdating:thiswouldhaveimplied rewriting thecontributions,uprootingthemfromthehistoricalandintellectual contextinwhich,andforwhich,theywereconceived.
Toconclude,somethingmustbesaidaboutthelastpaperinthepresent collection(A.24).Thisbrilliantnewassessmentofthemanuscripttraditionof the MajorDeclamations hasbeenwrittenexpresslyforthisbook,anditresults fromMW’scurrentmaincommitment:aLoebeditionofthe Maiores.Heis officiallyinchargeofthetranslationandpartofthenotes(Iamhandlingthe
¹¹HåkansonWinterbottom(2015);Winterbottom(2017d)and(2018). ¹²Winterbottom(2017c),410.
¹³Seee.g.Winterbottom(1983a),59ff.(= A.7 below,pp.105ff.);(2017b),151(= A.22 below, pp.2712).
Latintext,BiagioSantorellitherestofthenotesandtheintroduction(s));but his ‘holistic’ approachtoscholarshiphasneverchanged,sohisworkonthe translationhassoongivenrisetorepeateddiscussionsof locicritici,dozensof (alwaysastute,oftendecisive)conjectures,andanunprejudicedapproachto thetransmissionofthetext.Beinginvolvedinsuchadialoguewithsucha scholar andman isauniqueexperience,stillongoing.ButthereissomethingforwhichMWhastoturnelsewhere:whomightrevisehistranslationof thesetrickyandtwistedLatintexts?Somespecialhelpiscalledforagain,asin 1954 Well,theoldStJohn’sscholarisstillthere,aslearnedandacuteas ever,readytovethisformerpupil’stranslations andcontributesomeformidableconjecturesofhisown.Allthisistakingplaceover sixty yearssince MW’s(b.1934)andDonaldRussell’s(b.1920) firstsessiononRomandeclamation.FriendshipmaysometimesdefyNature’slaws.
ThisbookwouldhaveneverbeenproducedwithouttheunselfishandenthusiastichelpconstantlyprovidedbyFrancescaNocchiandGiuseppeRusso:my deepgratitudegoestothemboth.SpecialthanksarealsoduetoStephen Harrison,whofacilitatedandguidedcontactswithOUP,andwaseverprompt withadviceandsupport;andtoOUPitself,foracceptingandfelicitously bringingtopublicationananythingbuteasybook.InrecentyearsIhavehad theprivilegeofmeetingDonaldRussell,enjoyinghisgenerosity,andprofiting fromhisadvicealsoinrelationtothisbook:itisapleasuretothankhimmost warmlyforallthis. AuctoriamicoquecarissimoMichaeli,quisempermihi praestofuitinhocopereabsolvendo,postremasreddoeasquemaximasgratias: sithiclibelluslongaenostraeeximiaequeamicitiaepignus. A.S.
Bari
June2018
PublicationsofMichaelWinterbottom
*=includedinthisvolume.Periodicalsareabbreviatedaccordingto L’Année philologique,wheneverapplicable(add JML = JournalofMedievalLatin).
BOOKS
1. M.FabiQuintilianiInstitutionisoratoriaelibriduodecim,2vols.(Oxford, 1970).
2. ProblemsinQuintilian (London,1970).
3.&D.A.Russell, AncientLiteraryCriticism (Oxford,1972).
4. ThreeLivesofEnglishSaints (Toronto,1972).
5. TheElderSeneca.Declamations,2vols.(Cambridge[Mass.]andLondon, 1974).
6.&R.M.Ogilvie, CorneliiTacitiOperaminora (Oxford,1975).
7. Gildas.TheRuinofBritainandOtherWorks (LondonandChichester, 1978).¹
8. RomanDeclamation.ExtractsEditedwithCommentary (Bristol,1980).
9. TheMinorDeclamationsAscribedtoQuintilian (BerlinandNewYork,1984).
10. WilliamofMalmesbury.OnLamentations (Turnhout,2013).
11.&R.M.Thomson, WilliamofMalmesbury.TheMiraclesoftheBlessed VirginMary (Woodbridge,2015).²
*12.&D.Innes, SopatrostheRhetor,withanintroductionby M.Winterbottom(London,1988)(*pp.1–20).
13.&D.A.Russell, ClassicalLiteraryCriticism (Oxford,1989).
14.&M.Brett,C.N.L.Brooke, HughtheChanter.TheHistoryoftheChurch ofYork1066–1127 (Oxford,1990).
15.&M.Lapidge, WulfstanofWinchester.LifeofStÆthelwold (Oxford,1991).
16. M.TulliCiceronisDeofficiis (Oxford,1994).
17.&R.A.B.Mynors,R.M.Thomson, WilliamofMalmesbury. Gestaregum Anglorum,vol.1(Oxford,1998).
18.&R.M.Thomson, WilliamofMalmesbury.Saints ’ Lives (Oxford, 2002).
19.&T.Reinhardt, Quintilian. Institutiooratoria. Book2 (Oxford,2006).
¹Reissuedin2002withanewbibliographicalforeword. ²Reissuedin2017(paperback).
PublicationsofMichaelWinterbottom
20. WilliamofMalmesbury. GestapontificumAnglorum,vol.1(Oxford,2007).³
21.&J.Wisse,E.Fantham, M.TulliusCicero.DeoratorelibriIII,vol.5 (Heidelberg,2008).
22.&R.M.Thomson, WillelmiMeldunensismonachiLibersuper explanationemLamentationumIeremiaeprophetae (Turnhout,2011).
23.&M.Lapidge, TheEarlyLivesofStDunstan (Oxford,2012).
ARTICLESANDCHAPTERSIN MISCELLANEOUSVOLUME S
1. ‘Almeloveen’smanuscriptofQuintilian’ , CR 12(1962),121–2.
2. ‘ThetextualtraditionofQuintilian10.1.46f.’ , CQ 12(1962),169–75.
3. ‘Quintilian,v.10.91’ , CR 14(1964),14.
4. ‘MoreaboutAlmeloveen’ , CR 14(1964),243.
*5. ‘Quintilianandthe virbonus’ , JRS 54(1964),90–7.
6. ‘SomeproblemsinQuintilianBookTwo’ , Philologus 108(1964),119–27.
7. ‘ThebeginningofQuintilian’ s Institutio’ , CQ 17(1967),123–7.
8. ‘Quintilian, .1.3’ , CR 17(1967),264.
9. ‘QuintilianandBoethius’ , BICS 14 (1967),83.
10. ‘Fifteenth-centurymanuscriptsofQuintilian’ , CQ 17(1967),339–69.
11. ‘ThestyleofÆthelweard’ , MAev 36(1967),109–18.
12. ‘Onthe Hispericafamina’ , Celtica 8(1968),126–39.
13.Revisionofthe Dialogus,in Tacitus,vol.1(LondonandCambridge [Mass.],1970),217–347.
14.VariouscontributionstoN.G.L.HammondandH.H.Scullard(eds.), OxfordClassicalDictionary,2ndedn.(Oxford,1970).
15. ‘Sixconjectures’ , CR 22(1972),11–12.
16. ‘ThetransmissionofTacitus’ Dialogus’ , Philologus 116(1972),114–28.
17. ‘ThreelivesofSaintEthelwold’ , MAev 41(1972),191–201.
*18. ‘ProblemsintheElderSeneca’ , BICS 21(1974),20–42.
19. ‘TheprefaceofGildas’ Deexcidio’ , TransactionsoftheHonourableSociety ofCymmrodorion.Sessions1974and1975,277–87.
20. ‘On epitrochasmos’ , Glotta 53(1975),297–8.
*21. ‘Quintilian andrhetoric’,inT.A.Dorey(ed.), EmpireandAftermath. SilverLatinII (London,1975),79–97.
³ ‘withtheassistanceofR.M.Thomson’.Vol.2(IntroductionandCommentary)wasalso publishedin2007;thetitlepageread: ‘byR.M.ThomsonwiththeassistanceofM.Winter bottom’
22. ‘ThemanuscripttraditionofTacitus’ Germania’ , CPh 70(1975),1–7.
23. ‘ColumbanusandGildas’ , VChr 30(1976),310–17.
24. ‘Fieryparticles’ , CQ 26(1976),317–18.
25. ‘NotesonthetextofGildas’ , JThS 27(1976),132–40.
26. ‘Variationsonanauticaltheme’ , Hermathena 120(1976),55–8.
27. ‘Virgilandtheconfiscations’ , G&R 23(1976),55–9.
28. ‘A “Celtic” hyperbaton?’ , BulletinoftheBoardofCelticStudies 27(1977), 207–12.
29. ‘Aldhelm’sprosestyleanditsorigins’ , ASE 6(1977),39–76.
30. ‘TheotherVirgil’ , BICS 25(1978),146–56.
*31. ‘ThetextofSulpiciusVictor’ , BICS 26(1979),62–6.
*32. ‘CiceroandtheSilverAge’,inW.Ludwig(ed.), Éloquenceetrhétoriquechez Cicéron (VandoeuvresandGeneva,1982),237–66(‘Discussion’,267–74).
33. ‘Literarycriticism’,in TheCambridgeHistoryofClassicalLiterature, vol.2: LatinLiterature (Cambridge,1982),33–50.
*34. ‘Schoolroomandcourtroom’,inB.Vickers(ed.), RhetoricRevalued. PapersfromtheInternationalSocietyfortheHistoryofRhetoric (Binghamton[NY],1982),59–70.
*35. ‘Declamation,GreekandLatin’,inA.Ceresa-Gastaldo(ed.),Ars rhetorica anticaenuova (Genoa,1983),57–76.
*36. ‘Quintiliananddeclamation’,in HommagesàJeanCousin (Paris,1983), 225–35.
37.VariouscontributionstoL.D.Reynolds(ed.), TextsandTransmission. ASurveyoftheLatinClassics (Oxford,1983;corr.repr.1986).
38. ‘TheRomanoratorandhiseducation’ , Akroterion 30(1985),53–7.
39. ‘Mankindandotheranimals:the Georgics’,inR.A.Cardwelland J.Hamilton(eds.), VirgilinaCulturalTradition.EssaystoCelebratethe Bimillennium (Nottingham,1986),1–16.
40. ‘Totincassumfusospatierelabores?’ , CQ 36(1986),545–6.
41. ‘NotesontheLifeofEdwardtheConfessor’ , MAev 56(1987),82–4.
42. ‘Pelagiana’ , JThS 38(1987),106–29.
43. ‘TheLifeofChristinaofMarkyate’ , AB 105(1987),281–7.
*44. ‘Quintiliano(M.FabiusQuintilianus)’,in EnciclopediaVirgiliana,vol.4 (Rome,1988),374–6.
*45. ‘CiceroandtheMiddleStyle’,inJ.Diggle,J.B.Hall,andH.D.Jocelyn (eds.), StudiesinLatinLiteratureanditsTraditioninHonourof C.O.Brink (Cambridge,1989),125–31.
46. ‘Speakingofthegods’ , G&R 36(1989),33–41.
47. ‘NewlightontheXtraditionofCicero’ s Deofficiis’ , MD 24(1990),135–41.
48. ‘RogerAubreyBaskervilleMynors’ , PBA 80(1991),371–401.
49. ‘AeneasandtheideaofTroy’ , PVS 21(1993),17–34.
50. ‘ThetransmissionofCicero’ s Deofficiis’ , CQ 43(1993),215–42.
xvi PublicationsofMichaelWinterbottom
51. ‘Conjecturesonsomeinsulartexts’,inD.Conso,N.Fick,andB.Poulle (eds.), MélangesFrançoisKerlouégan (Paris,1994),667–72.
*52. ‘Onimpulse’,inD.Innes,H.Hine,andC.Pelling(eds.), Ethicsand Rhetoric.ClassicalEssaysforDonaldRussellonhisSeventy-FifthBirthday (Oxford,1995),313–22.
53. ‘The Gestaregum ofWilliamofMalmesbury’ , JML 5(1995),158–73.
54. ‘TheO.C.T. Deofficiis:apostscript’ , CQ 45(1995),265–6.
55. ‘ThetextofAmbrose’ s Deofficiis’ , JThS 46(1995),559–66.
56.&S.J.Harrison, ‘ThenewpassageofTiberiusClaudiusDonatus’ , CQ 45(1995),547–50.
57. ‘The integri ofCicero’ s Topica’ , CQ 46(1996),403–10.
58. ‘Introduzione’,inS.Corsi, MarcoFabioQuintiliano.Laformazione dell’oratore,vol.1(Milan,1997),5–26.
59. ‘DestudiisLatinisOxoniensibus’ , VoxLat 33(1997),542–9.
*60. ‘Quintilianthemoralist’,inT.Albaladejo,E.delRío,andJ.A.Caballero (eds.), Quintiliano:HistoriayActualidaddelaRétorica,vol.1(Logroño, 1998),317–34.
61. ‘Tacitus, Dialogus 13.4’ , CQ 49(1999),338.
*62. ‘AnemendationinCalpurniusFlaccus’ , CQ 49(1999),338–9.
63. ‘InpraiseofRaphaelRegius’,inS.Döpp(ed.), AntikeRhetorikundihre Rezeption.SymposionzuEhrenvonProfessorDr.CarlJoachimClassen (Stuttgart,1999),99–116.
64. ‘NotesonWilliamofPoitiers’ , JML 9(1999),121–30.
65.&J.J.Murphy, ‘RaffaeleRegio’s1492 Quaestio doubtingCicero’ s authorshipofthe RhetoricaadHerennium’ , Rhetorica 17(1999),77–87.
66. ‘ThreeemendationsinColumella’ , CQ 49(1999),633–4.
67. ‘Lucretius5.845–854’ , Hermes 128(2000),505–6.
*68. ‘MoreproblemsinQuintilian’ , BICS 44(2000),167–77.
69. ‘TheearliestLifeofStDunstan’ , SCI 19(2000),163–79.
70. ‘AnewpassageofWilliamofMalmesbury’ s Gestapontificum ’ , JML 11 (2001),50–9.
71. ‘LeightonDurhamReynolds’ , PBA 111(2001),659–76.
72. ‘ReturningtoTacitus’ Dialogus’,inC.W.Wooten(ed.), TheOratorin ActionandTheoryinGreeceandRome.EssaysinHonorofGeorge A.Kennedy (Leiden,Boston,andCologne,2001),137–55.
73.&S.J.Harrison, ‘TheprologuetoApuleius’ Metamorphoses’,in A.KahaneandA.Laird(eds.), ACompaniontothePrologueofApuleius’ Metamorphoses(Oxford,2001),9–15.
74. ‘WilliamofMalmesbury versificus ’,inS.EchardandG.R.Wieland (eds.), Anglo-LatinanditsHeritage.EssaysinHonourofA.G.Riggonhis 64thBirthday (Turnhout,2001),109–27.
75. ‘Believingthe ProMarcello’,inJ.E.Miller,C.Damon,andK.S.Myers(eds.), Vertisinusum.StudiesinHonorof EdwardCourtney (Munich,2002),24–38.
PublicationsofMichaelWinterbottom xvii
76.&M.Deufert,J.F.Gaertner, ‘Criticalnotesonthe Heroides’ , Hermes 130 (2002),502–6.
*77. ‘Ennodius, Dictio 21’,inB.-J.andJ.-P.Schröder(eds.),Studium declamatorium.UntersuchungenzuSchulübungenundPrunkredenvon derAntikebiszurNeuzeit (MunichandLeipzig,2003),275–88.
78. ‘TheLanguageofWilliamofMalmesbury’,inC.J.Mews, C.J.Nederman,andR.M.Thomson(eds.), RhetoricandRenewalinthe LatinWest1100–1540.EssaysinHonourofJohnO.Ward (Turnhout, 2003),129–47.
79. ‘GrilliusonCicero’ s Deinventione’ , CQ 54(2004),592–605.
80. ‘Perorations’,inJ.G.F.PowellandJ.Paterson(eds.), CicerotheAdvocate (Oxford,2004),215–30.
*81. ‘SomethingnewoutofArmenia’ , Letrasclássicas 8(2004),111–28.
82. ‘AneditionofFaricius, VitaS.Aldhelmi’ , JML 15(2005),93–147.
*83. ‘Approachingtheend:Quintilian12.11’ , AClass 48(2005),175–83.
84. ‘FariciusofArezzo’sLifeofStAldhelm’,inK.O’BrienO’Keeffeand A.Orchard(eds.), LatinLearningandEnglishLore.StudiesinAngloSaxonLiteratureforMichaelLapidge,vol.1(Toronto,Buffaloand London,2005),109–31.
*85. ‘Declamationandphilosophy’ , Classica(Brasil) 19(2006),74–82.
*86. ‘Quintilian12.11.11–12’ , CQ 56(2006),324–5.
87. ‘Cyprian’ s AdDonatum’,inS.Swain,S.J.Harrison,andJ.Elsner(eds.), SeveranCulture (Cambridge,2007),190–8.
88. ‘Bede’ s castella’ , QuaestioInsularis 10(2009),1–7.
89. ‘ConversationsinBede’ s Historiaecclesiastica’,inE.Dickeyand A.Chahoud(eds.), ColloquialandLiteraryLatin (Cambridge,2010), 419–30.
90. ‘WilliamofMalmesburyandtheNormans’ , JML 20(2010),70–7.
91. ‘Bede’shomilyonBenedictBishop(Hom.1.13)’ , JML 21(2011), 35–51.
92. ‘Onancientproserhythm:thestoryofthedichoreus’,inD.Obbinkand R.Rutherford(eds.), CultureinPieces.EssaysonAncientTextsinHonour ofPeterParsons (Oxford,2011),262–76.
93. ‘Devitapatris’,inD.DamschenandA.Heil(eds.), Brill’sCompanionto Seneca (LeidenandBoston,2014),695.
94. ‘Movingthegoalposts:there-writingofmedievalLatinprosetexts’ , Ars edendiLectureSeries 3(2014),29–48.
*95. ‘WilliamofMalmesbury’sworkonthe Declamationesmaiores’ , S&T 12 (2014),261–76.
96. ‘TheearliestpassionofStAlban’ , InvLuc 37(2015),113–27.
97.& †L.Håkanson, ‘TribunusMarianus’,inL.DelCorso,F.DeVivo,and A.Stramaglia(eds.), Nelsegnodeltesto.Edizioni,materialiestudiper OronzoPecere (Florence,2015),61–90.
xviii PublicationsofMichaelWinterbottom
98. ‘LennartHåkanson:derMensch,derGelehrte’,inL.Håkanson, UnveröffentlichteSchriften,vol.2: KritischerKommentarzuSeneca Maior, Controversiae,BuchI,ed.byF.Citti,B.Santorelli,and A.Stramaglia(BerlinandBoston,2016),
99. ‘ThestyleofÆlnoth’,inM.Münster-Swendsen,T.K.Heebøll-Holm, andS.OlsenSønnesyn(eds.), HistoricalandIntellectualCultureinthe LongTwelfthCentury:TheScandinavianConnection (Durhamand Toronto,2016),119–30.
100. ‘KarstenFriis-Jensen’spreliminary findingstowardsaneweditionof SvenAggesen’,ibid.,295–317.
101. ‘TextandtransmissionofsomeBedantexts’ , MLatJb 52(2017),445–59. *102. ‘TheeditorsofCalpurniusFlaccus’,inM.Dinter,C.Guérin,and M.Martinho(eds.), ReadingRomanDeclamation.CalpurniusFlaccus (BerlinandBoston,2017),141–60.
103. ‘Thepleasuresofediting’ , RHT 12(2017),393–413.
104. ‘The TribunusMarianus andthedevelopmentofthe cursus ’,in P.Chiesa,A.M.Fagnoni,andR.E.Guglielmetti(eds.),Ingeniofacilis. PerGiovanniOrlandi(1938–2007) (Florence,2017),231–47.
105. ‘ThevocabularyofWilliamofMalmesbury’ , Aevum 91(2017),377–409.
106. ‘Words,words,words ’,inR.M.Thomson,E.Dolmans,and E.A.Winkler(eds.), DiscoveringWilliamofMalmesbury (Woodbridge, 2017),203–18.
107. ‘Cyrus, OntheDifferentiationofIssues’ , S&T 16(2018),209–46.
*108. ‘Thewordsofthemaster’ , Maia 70(2018),73–83.
*109. ‘Themanuscripttraditionof[Quintilian]’ s MajorDeclamations:anew approach’,inthisbook.
110. ‘Beginningahistory’ , JML 29(2019),101–21.
111. ‘ThemanuscriptsofBerengarofPoitiers’ , MLatJb 54(2019),157–61.
112. ‘PopeUrban’sspeechatClermont.WilliamofMalmesbury, Gesta RegumAnglorum 347’ , MLatJb 54(2019),162–7.
113. ‘Notesonthetextofthe MajorDeclamations’ , MD 82(2019) [forthcoming].
SELECTEDREVIEWS
1.A.E.Douglas, M.TulliCiceronisBrutus (Oxford,1966), CR 17 (1967),301–3.⁴
2.A.Campbell, AethelwulfDeabbatibus (Oxford,1967), MAev 38(1969), 60–4.
⁴ Thisisthe firstinalongseriesofreviewsin CR,onlyafewofwhicharelistedhere.
3.G.Luck, UntersuchungenzurTextgeschichteOvids (Heidelberg,1969), CR 21(1971),208–9.
4.J.W.Smit, StudiesintheLanguageandStyleofColumbatheYounger (Columbanus) (Amsterdam,1971), MAev 41(1972),243–4.
5.H.Weiskopf, P.CorneliTacitiAnnaliumlibriXI–XII (Vienna,Cologne, andGraz,1973), CPh 76(1975),283–4.
6.M.W.Herren, The Hispericafamina :TheA-Text (Toronto,1974), MAev 45(1976),105–9.
7.T.Janson, ProseRhythminMedievalLatinfromthe9thtothe13th Century (Stockholm,1975), MAev 45(1976),298–300.
8.S.Usher, DionysiusofHalicarnassus.TheCriticalEssays,vol.1 (Cambridge[Mass.]andLondon,1974), CR 26(1976),173–4.
*9.L.Håkanson, TextkritischeStudienzudengrösserenpseudoquintilianischen Deklamationen (Lund,1974), CR 26(1976),276.
*10.J.Cousin, Quintilien.Institutionoratoire,Tome (Paris,1975)and RecherchessurQuintilien (Paris,1975), Gnomon 49(1977),574–9.
11.J.N.Hillgarth, SanctiIulianiToletanaesedisepiscopiOpera,Pars (Turnhout,1976), JThS 28(1977),571–4.⁵
*12.J.Cousin, Quintilien.Institutionoratoire,Tomes – (Paris,1976), Gnomon 50(1978),685–7.
13.G.Pompella, FrancisciRobortelliUtinensisDeartesiverationecorrigendi antiquorumlibrosdisputatio (Naples,1975), CR 28(1978),197–8.
*14.J.Cousin, Quintilien.Institutionoratoire,Tome (Paris,1977), Gnomon 51(1979),388–9.
*15.S.F.Bonner, EducationinAncientRome:FromtheElderCatotothe YoungerPliny (London,1977), CR 29(1979),73–4.
*16.L.A.Sussman, TheElderSeneca (Leiden,1978), CR 29(1979),231–2.
*17.J.Cousin, Quintilien.Institutionoratoire,Tomes – (Paris,1978; 1979), Gnomon 52(1980),785–6.
*18.J.Cousin, Quintilien.Institutionoratoire,Tome (Paris,1980), Gnomon 53(1981),197–9.
19.M.W.Herren, The Hispericafamina. :RelatedPoems (Toronto,1987), Peritia 6–7(1987–8),331–2.
20.G.Achard, RhétoriqueàHerennius (Paris,1989), Gnomon 63(1991),459–61.
*21.L.Håkanson, L.AnnaeusSenecaMaior.Oratorumetrhetorum sententiae,divisiones,colores (Leipzig,1989), CR 41(1991),338–40.
22.J.B.Hall, IoannisSaresberiensisMetalogicon (Turnhout,1991), JEH 43 (1992),470–1.⁶
⁵ Thisisthe firstinalongseriesofreviewsofpatristictextsinthisjournal,notlistedhere. ⁶ OtherreviewsofChristiantextsappearinlaterissuesofthisjournal.
PublicationsofMichaelWinterbottom
23.K.M.Coleman,J.Diggle,J.B.Hall,andH.D.Jocelyn(eds.), F.R.D.Goodyear,PapersonLatinLiterature (London,1992), CR 44 (1994),196–8.
24.R.Granatelli, ApollodoriPergameniacTheodoriGadareitestimoniaet fragmenta (Rome,1991), CR 44(1994),203–4.
25.M.Irvine, TheMakingofTextualCulture: Grammatica andLiterary Theory,350–1000 (Cambridge,1994), JML 5(1995),273–6.
26.D.Lassandro, XIIPanegyriciLatini (Turin,1992), Gnomon 67(1995),560–1.
27.O.Prinz, DieKosmographiedesAethicus (Munich,1993), Peritia 9 (1995),430–2.
*28.L.A.Sussman, TheDeclamationsofCalpurniusFlaccus.Text, Translation,andCommentary (Leiden,NewYork,andCologne,1994), CR 45(1995),40–2.
29.J.Stevenson, The LaterculusMalalianus andtheSchoolofArchbishop Theodore (Cambridge,1995), NotesandQueries 43(1996),457–9.
30.G.DiMaria, MarciTulliCiceronisTopica (Palermo,1994), Gnomon 69 (1997),647–8.
31.R.Wardy, TheBirthofRhetoric (LondonandNewYork,1996) W.J.Dominik(ed.), RomanEloquence (LondonandNewYork,1997) C.LévyandL.Pernot(eds.), Direl’évidence (ParisandMontreal,1997), SCI 17(1998),238–42.
32.H.M.Hine, L.AnnaeiSenecaeNaturaliumquaestionumlibri (Stuttgart andLeipzig,1996)and StudiesintheTextofSeneca’ s Naturales quaestiones(StuttgartandLeipzig,1996), SCI 17(1998),242–5.
33.J.Briscoe, ValeriMaximiFactaetdictamemorabilia (Stuttgartand Leipzig,1998), SCI 18(1999),191–4.
34.G.W.Most(ed.), EditingTexts Texteedieren (Göttingen,1998), SCI 19 (2000),328–30.
*35.A.Stramaglia, [Quintiliano].Igemellimalati:uncasodivivisezione (Declamazionimaggiori,8) (Cassino,1999), CR 50(2000),305–6.
36.S.Gwara, AldhelmiMalmesbiriensisProsadevirginitatecumglosaLatina atqueAnglosaxonica (Turnhout,2001), Speculum 79(2004),1017–18.
37.B.Löfstedt, VirgiliusMaroGrammaticus.Operaomnia (Munichand Leipzig,2003), Gnomon 77(2005),362–4.
38.J.C.Yardley, JustinandPompeiusTrogus:AStudyoftheLanguageof Justin’sEpitomeofTrogus (Toronto,Buffalo,andLondon,2003), IJCT 12 (2005–6),463–5.
*39.M.Weissenberger, SopatriQuaestionumdivisio Sopatros:Streitfälle. GliederungundAusarbeitungkontroverserReden (Würzburg,2010), Gnomon 83(2011),394–6.
40.F.Wendling, HugonisdeMiromariDehominismiseria,mundietinferni contemptu (Turnhout,2010), JML 21(2011),333–8.
Acknowledgements
Weshouldliketothankthefollowingpublishersorinstitutionsforkindly grantingpermissiontoreprintMichaelWinterbottom’spaperslistedbelow:
BINGHAMTONUNIVERSITY CENTERFOR MEDIEVAL&RENAISSANCESTUDIES
Articlesandchapters
‘Schoolroomandcourtroom’,inB.Vickers(ed.), RhetoricRevalued.Papers fromtheInternationalSocietyfortheHistoryofRhetoric (Binghamton[NY]: CenterforMedieval&EarlyRenaissanceStudies,1982),59–70. (A.6)
CAMBRIDGEPHILOLOGICALSOCIETY
Articlesandchapters
‘Ciceroandthemiddlestyle’,inJ.Diggle,J.B.Hall,andH.D.Jocelyn(eds.), StudiesinLatinLiteratureanditsTraditioninHonourofC.O.Brink (Cambridge,1989)[=CambridgePhilologicalSociety,SupplementaryVolume15], 125–31. (A.11)
CAMBRIDGEUNIVERSITYPRESS
Articlesandchapters
‘Quintilianandthe virbonus’ , JournalofRomanStudies 54(1964),90–7. ©MichaelWinterbottom,1964.ExclusiveLicencetoPublish:TheSociety forthePromotionofRomanStudies.Reprintedwiththepermissionof CambridgeUniversityPress: http://www.cambridge.org/rights/permissions/authors.htm. (A.1)
‘AnemendationinCalpurniusFlaccus’ , ClassicalQuarterly 49(1999), 338–9. © TheClassicalAssociation,1999.Reprintedwiththepermissionof CambridgeUniversityPress: http://www.cambridge.org/rights/permissions/authors.htm. (A.14)
‘Quintilian12.11.11–12’ , ClassicalQuarterly 56(2006),324–5.©The ClassicalAssociation,2006.ReprintedwiththepermissionofCambridgeUniversityPress: http://www.cambridge.org/rights/permissions/authors.htm. (A.19)
Reviews
L.Håkanson, TextkritischeStudienzudengrösserenpseudoquintilianischen Deklamationen (Lund,1974), ClassicalReview 26(1976),276.©TheClassical Association,1976.ReprintedwiththepermissionofCambridgeUniversityPress: http://www.cambridge.org/rights/permissions/authors.htm. (R.1)
S.F.Bonner, EducationinAncientRome:FromtheElderCatototheYounger Pliny (London,1977), ClassicalReview 29(1979),73–4.©TheClassical Association,1979.ReprintedwiththepermissionofCambridgeUniversityPress: http://www.cambridge.org/rights/permissions/authors.htm. (R.5)
L.A.Sussman, TheElderSeneca (Leiden,1978), ClassicalReview 29 (1979),231–2.©TheClassicalAssociation,1979.ReprintedwiththepermissionofCambridgeUniversityPress: http://www.cambridge.org/rights/permissions/authors.htm. (R.6)
L.Håkanson, L.AnnaeusSenecaMaior.Oratorumetrhetorumsententiae, divisiones,colores (Leipzig,1989), ClassicalReview 41(1991),338–40.©The ClassicalAssociation,1991.ReprintedwiththepermissionofCambridgeUniversityPress: http://www.cambridge.org/rights/permissions/authors.htm. (R.9)
L.A.Sussman, TheDeclamationsofCalpurniusFlaccus.Text,Translation, andCommentary (Leiden,NewYork,andCologne,1994), ClassicalReview 45(1995),40–2.©TheClassicalAssociation,1995.ReprintedwiththepermissionofCambridgeUniversityPress: http://www.cambridge.org/rights/permissions/authors.htm. (R.10)
A.Stramaglia, [Quintiliano].Igemellimalati:uncasodivivisezione(Declamazionimaggiori,8) (Cassino,1999), ClassicalReview 50(2000),305–6. ©TheClassicalAssociation,2000.ReprintedwiththepermissionofCambridgeUniversityPress: http://www.cambridge.org/rights/permissions/authors.htm. (R.11)
C.H.BECK
Reviews
J.Cousin, Quintilien.Institutionoratoire,Tome (Paris,1975)and Recherches surQuintilien (Paris,1975), Gnomon 49(1977),574–9. (R.2)
J.Cousin, Quintilien.Institutionoratoire,Tomes – (Paris,1976), Gnomon 50(1978),685–7. (R.3)
J.Cousin, Quintilien.Institutionoratoire,Tome (Paris,1977), Gnomon 51(1979),388–9. (R.4)
J.Cousin, Quintilien.Institutionoratoire,Tomes – (Paris,1978;1979), Gnomon 52(1980),785–6. (R.7)
J.Cousin, Quintilien.Institutionoratoire,Tome (Paris,1980), Gnomon 53(1981),197–9. (R.8)
M.Weissenberger, SopatriQuaestionumdivisio Sopatros:Streitfälle.GliederungundAusarbeitungkontroverserReden (Würzburg,2010), Gnomon 83 (2011),394–6. (R.12)
EDITRICEMORCELLIANA
Articlesandchapters
‘Thewordsofthemaster’ , Maia 70(2018),73–83. (A.23)
FONDATIONHARDTPOURL ’ ÉTUDE
DEL ’ ANTIQUITÉCLASSIQUE
Articlesandchapters
‘CiceroandtheSilverAge’,inW.Ludwig(ed.), Éloquenceetrhétorique chezCicéron (VandoeuvresandGeneva:FondationHardtpourl’étudede l’Antiquitéclassique, Entretienssurl’Antiquitéclassique TomeXXVIII, 1982),237–66(‘Discussion’,267–74). (A.5)
INSTITUTODEESTUDIOSRIOJANOS
Articlesandchapters
‘Quintilianthemoralist’,inT.Albaladejo,E.delRío,andJ.A.Caballero(eds.), Quintiliano:HistoriayActualidaddelaRétorica,vol.1(Logroño,1998), 317–34. (A.13)
ISTITUTODELLAENCICLOPEDIAITALIANA
Articlesandchapters
‘Quintiliano(M.FabiusQuintilianus)’,in EnciclopediaVirgiliana,vol.4 (Rome,1988),374–6.BycourtesyoftheIstitutodellaEnciclopediaItaliana Treccani.Anyuseinadditiontoorbeyondtheinclusioninthisvolume willbesubjecttorequestfromandapprovalbytheIstitutodellaEnciclopedia Italiana. (A.9)
JOHNWILEY&SONS
Articlesandchapters
‘ProblemsintheElderSeneca’ , BulletinoftheInstituteofClassicalStudies 21 (1974),20–42.©InstituteofClassicalStudies.SchoolofAdvancedStudies, UniversityofLondon,1974.ReproducedbypermissionofJohnWiley&Sons. (A.2)
‘ThetextofSulpiciusVictor’ , BulletinoftheInstituteofClassicalStudies 26 (1979),62–6.©InstituteofClassicalStudies.SchoolofAdvancedStudies,UniversityofLondon,1979.Reproducedby permissionofJohnWiley&Sons. (A.4) IntroductiontoD.Innes&M.Winterbottom, SopatrostheRhetor (London, 1988),1–20.©InstituteofClassicalStudies.SchoolofAdvancedStudies, UniversityofLondon,1988.ReproducedbypermissionofJohnWiley& Sons. (A.10)
‘MoreproblemsinQuintilian’ , BulletinoftheInstituteofClassicalStudies 44(2000),167–77.©InstituteofClassicalStudies.SchoolofAdvanced Studies,UniversityofLondon,2000.ReproducedbypermissionofJohn Wiley&Sons. (A.15)
LESBELLESLETTRES
Articlesandchapters
‘Quintiliananddeclamation’,in HommagesàJeanCousin (Paris,1983), 225–35.©LesBellesLettres,1983. (A.8)
OXFORDUNIVERSITYPRESS
Articlesandchapters
‘Onimpulse’,inD.Innes,H.Hine,andC.Pelling(eds.), EthicsandRhetoric. ClassicalEssaysforDonaldRussellonhisSeventy-FifthBirthday (Oxford, 1995),313–22.ReproducedbypermissionofOxfordUniversityPress: https://global.oup.com/. (A.12)
SOCIEDADEBRASILEIRADEESTUDOSCLÁSSICOS
Articlesandchapters
‘Declamationandphilosophy’ , Classica.RevistaBrasileiradeEstudosClássicos 19(2006),74–82.DOI:http://doi.org/10.24277/classica.v19i1.105. (A.20)
TAYLOR&FRANCISGROUP
Articlesandchapters
‘Quintilianandrhetoric’,inT.A.Dorey(ed.), EmpireandAftermath.Silver LatinII (London,1975),79–97. (A.3)
THECLASSICALASSOCIATIONOFSOUTHAFRICA
Articlesandchapters
‘Approachingtheend:Quintilian12.11’ , ActaClassica 48(2005),175–83. ReprintedwiththepermissionoftheClassicalAssociationofSouthAfrica. (A.18)
UNIVERSIDADEDESÃOPAULO
Articlesandchapters
‘SomethingnewoutofArmenia’ , Letrasclássicas 8(2004),111–28. (A.17)
UNIVERSITÀDEGLISTUDIDICASSINO EDELLAZIOMERIDIONALE
Articlesandchapters
‘WilliamofMalmesbury’sworkonthe Declamationesmaiores’ , SegnoeTesto 12(2014),261–76. (A.21)
UNIVERSITÀDEGLISTUDIDI GENOVA DIPARTIMENTODIANTICHITÀ, FILOSOFIA,STORIA
Articlesandchapters
‘Declamation,GreekandLatin’,inA.Ceresa-Gastaldo(ed.),Arsrhetorica anticaenuova (Genoa,1983),57–76. (A.7)
WALTERDEGRUYTERGMBH
Articlesandchapters
‘Ennodius, Dictio 21’,inB.-J.andJ.-P.Schröder(eds.),Studiumdeclamatorium.UntersuchungenzuSchulübungenundPrunkredenvonderAntikebis zurNeuzeit (MunichandLeipzig,2003),275–88.©2003byK.G.SaurVerlag GmbH,MunichandLeipzig(nowDeGruyter). (A.16)
‘TheeditorsofCalpurniusFlaccus’,inM.Dinter,C.Guérin,andM.Martinho (eds.), ReadingRomanDeclamation.CalpurniusFlaccus (BerlinandBoston, 2017),141–60. © WalterdeGruyterGmbH,Berlin/Boston2017. (A.22)
Thepublisherandeditorsapologizeforanyerrorsoromissionsintheabovelist. Ifcontactedtheywillbepleasedtorectifytheseattheearliestopportunity.
