1 WritingasanEssentialResearchSkill
Theimpactofscientificresearchdependscriticallyonhowwellitiscommunicatedto others.Inmostsciences,thismeanswritingascientificpaperthatotherscientistswill read.Perhapsyouhavedoneamazingexperimentsandthinkthatthiswillguarantee success.However,withoutgoodwriting,youmaystruggletogetyourpaperpublished andyourbrilliantexperimentswillnothavetheimpactthattheydeserve.Goodwriting can’tsavebadscience,butbadwritingcansinkgoodscience(Cartoon 1.1).
Cartoon1.1 Theweakestlink. Sciencecanbeimaginedasachainwiththreelinks.Theselinks represent:(1)identifyingaproblemthatneedssolving;(2)doingtheresearch,suchasanexperiment, tosolvethatproblem;and(3)communicatingtheresults,primarilythroughwritingapeer-reviewed publication.Ultimately,apieceofscienceisonlyasgoodasitsweakestlink,sohoweverstrongthefirst twolinks,ifthewritingisweak,thechainwillbreak.
Mostscientistsacceptthatlearningnewskillsisanessentialpartofcarryingout goodresearch.Thismightinvolveacquiringnewlaboratorytechniquesorslavingover anewcomputerprogram.Butwhilemostscientistsacceptthetimerequiredtolearn skills,itisoftenassumedthatwritingissomethingthatcanjustbedone,becauseitwas learntatschooloruniversity.Indeed,thewritingofascientificpaperisoftenseenasan undemandingtaskthatcanbedonequicklyattheend,oncetherealjobofdoingthe researchisfinished.
Inouropinion,thisviewofscientificwritingcouldnotbefurtherfromthetruth.The writingofascientificpaperishardwork.Furthermore,writingisaskillthatneedsto belearntandpractised.Indeed,goodwritingcanrequireamuchlongerlearningperiod
thanmanyfamiliarresearchtechniques.Althoughgoodwritingishard,webelievethata fewsimpletipscaneasilyremedymanyofthemostfamiliarpitfalls,andthegoodnews isthatscientistskeepimprovingtheirwritingthroughouttheircareers.
Inthisbookweaimtohelpyouproducebetterscientificpapers.Weacceptthatwritingisahigh-levelskillthatcan’tbemasteredbyjustreadingaguidebook,andthatit’s alsopersonal—yourstyleisparticulartoyou.However,webelievethatafewsimple pointerswouldimprovethequalityofmuchwriting.Weseethesamemistakestimeand timeagain—mistakesthatcouldeasilybefixed.Byhelpingavoidtheseerrors,wehope tomaketheexperienceofwritingmoresatisfying,lessdaunting,and,darewesayit, evenfun.
Ourfundamentalprincipleissimple: Thereadermustcomefirst.Toooftenscientists writeforthemselvesortosoundscientific,wheninfacttheirjobistohelpthereader understandthecontentoftheirpaperbymakingthingsasclearandstraightforward aspossible(Box 1.1).Thestoryofyourpapermustbeeasytodigestandwritten inrelativelyplainEnglish,ratherthaninhighlytechnicalgobbledygook.Strangely, thisdoesnotalwayscomenaturally,andrequiresachangeofthinkingonthepartof thewriter.Forexample,itrequiresthewritertoaskquestionslike:isthereanypossiblewaythatthissentencecouldbemisunderstood?Webelievethat,oncemastered,the rewardsoftakingourapproachareenormous,asyoursciencewillhavesomuchmore impact.
Wehavewrittenthisbookintheformofatoolkitforproducingthedifferentsections ofastandardscientificpaper:Abstract,Introduction,Methods,Results,andDiscussion. Eachchapterstandsalone,sothatyoucanreadtheminanyorder,ordipinandout,as required(Box 1.2).Therearealsoboxesandsummarieswithhelpfuladviceforthose wholiketoflickthroughbooksanddon’twanttoreadthisonefromcovertocover.At theendofeachchapterthereisasummarytable,soifyouwanttoreturntoaparticular chapter,youdon’thavetoreadthewholethingagain.Wehopethatbybreakingapaper downintomanageablesections,youwillfinditeasiertowrite.Wehavealsoprovided supplementaryonlinematerialtocomplementthechapters,andtofacilitaterunninga course(class)basedonthisbook(Box 1.3).
Gettingstartedonascientificpaperisoftenthehardestpart.Peoplehavedifferent viewsonwheretostart,butwepresentthesectionsofascientificpaperintheorderin whichwethinkitiseasiesttowritethem.Methodsareagoodplacetostartbecauseyou simplydescribewhatyoudid.TheResultssectionfollowsnaturallyfromtheMethods, sowepresentthischapternext.TheIntroductionandDiscussionarehardertowrite,as theyrequirecontext,linkstotheliterature,andgenerallymorethoughtfulanalysisand interpretation.Counter-intuitively,althoughtheAbstractisthefirstsectionofafinished scientificpaper,wethinkitisbestwrittenlast,onceyouarehappywitheverythingelse andareclearaboutthestoryofyourpaper.Finally,aftercoveringthedifferentsections ofapaper,weexplainhowtowriteacoverletter,andhowtoeditapaper,onceyou haveafulldraft.
Wehopethatyouarenowitchingtogetstarted,butbeforewegetontothedetails ofspecificsections,weprovidesometipsthathelpallsections.Takethecoreskillsquiz beforereadingChapter2(Box1.4).
Box1.1 TheReader
Writersoftenimaginethatreaderswilldiligentlyworkthroughtheirpaper,sectionbysection, untiltheyhavereadandunderstoodeveryword.But,whilethiswasoftenthecaseatschool anduniversity,there’snoguaranteethatpotentialreadersofscientificpaperswillapplythe samelevelofdiligence.Thereisarapidlyexpandingliteraturewithineveryscientificdiscipline andfindingtimetoreadthelatestresearchisincreasinglychallengingforscientistsatall levels.
Afarbetterimageofyourpotentialreaderissomeonetime-limited,stressed,andeasily bored(Cartoon 1.2).Theyhaveamillionotherthingstodoandwilltakeanyexcusetogive uponreadingyourpaper.TheymightbeaPhDstudenttryingtogettogripswiththeir subject,oraprofessorwhodoesn’treallyhavetimetoreadpapersanymore.Unfortunately, unlesstheyareareviewer,theydon’t have toreadyourpaper,soit’syourjobtomakethem wantto.
Cartoon1.2 Thereader. Pictureyourpotentialreader.Youarecompetingfortheirattention withotherscientificpapers,otherworktasks,email,Twitter,theentirecontentoftheinternet,and anyotherhobbiesorpastimesthattheyenjoy.Gettingsomeonetoreadandunderstandyourpaper shouldn’tbetakenforgranted;itisanincredibleachievement.
Toconvincepotentialreaderstokeepreadingyourpaper,youmustwriteitinawaythat theycaneasilyunderstand.Theymightnotbequiteasinterestedinyoursubjectareaasyou are.Theymightbetired,hungover,orjustinabadmood.Indeed,evenrefereeswhohave agreedtogiveyourpaperafairchancewillnotenjoystrugglingthroughapoorlywritten papertofinditsinnerbeauty.Ifrefereesfindapaperconfusingorhard,thentheymight justrejectit.TheJournalof EnvironmentalMicrobiology publishedafewquotesfromreal reviewerstohighlightthisproblem:
‘Thebiggestproblemwiththismanuscript,whichhasnearlysuckedthewilltoliveoutofme,is theterriblewritingstyle.’
‘ThewritinganddatapresentationaresobadthatIhadtoleaveworkandgohomeearlyand thenspendtimetowonderwhatlifeisabout.’
Whilethesecommentsaresomewhatextremeandwerechosentoentertainreadersofthe journal,theyemphasizehowmuchgoodwritingcanmatter.
Whentheirpapersarerejected,authorsoftencurserefereesforbeingidiotswhoalmost wilfullychosetomisunderstandtheirpaper.Butthatirritatingreviewerwasn’tarandomly selectedperson—theywerechosenbytheeditorassomeonewhocouldreasonablyassessthe author’swork.Therefereefeltthattheyknewenoughtoaccepttherefereeingassignment, despitehavingamillionotherthingstodo.Consequently,theyareagoodapproximationto thekindofreaderthattheauthorwantstoattract.
So,remember,it’syourjobtomakeyourpapereasyforpotentialreaderstounderstand. It’snotthereader’sjobtostruggletheirwaythroughsomethingthattheycan’tfollow.
Box1.2 IsThisBookforYou?
Wehavetargetedthisbookatresearchersacrossthebiological,life,andhumansciences. However,webelievethatthecorepointsapplymorewidelytoanynaturalscience,andtoother relateddisciplinessuchasappliedmathematicsorcomputerscience.Weillustrateourpoints withsimplebiologicalandhumanexamplesthatdonotassumepriorknowledgeandcouldbe understoodbyanyonewithascientificbackground.Producingreadablepapersisespecially importantforinterdisciplinaryscience.Thetopscientificjournalsexpecttheirpaperstobe understoodbyabroadrangeofscientists,includingnon-specialists.Ourbookisaimedat bothnativeandnon-nativeEnglishspeakers,withapplied,actionabletips,andnumerous illustrativeexamplesofgoodandbadwriting.
Box1.3 SupplementaryOnlineMaterial
Wehavealsoprovidedadditionalmaterial,tohelpreadersofthisbook,andtofacilitateusing thisbooktoteachacourseonwriting.Wehavedevelopedsomeshortquizzes,whichwe recommendyoutakebeforereadingeachchapter,andsomesimpleexercisestoillustrateor reinforceprinciples.Wehavedevelopedascientificwritingcoursebasedonthisbook.This courseinvolveseightclasses,wherethestudentsworkingroupstocompleteexercisesbefore eachclass.WehavetaughtthiscourseatOxford,tobothMastersandPhDstudents.Allthe supplementarymaterialcanbereachedviasignpostedQRcodes,orfromthecompanion website(https://global.oup.com/us/companion.websites/978019286278/sm/).
CoreSkills
Thereareveryfewrulesaboutwritingthatcan’tbebroken.Skilledwritersoftenplay withrulesorconventions.Butthisbookisn’taimedatskilledwriters—itisaimedatthose whoarejuststarting,oraretryingtomaketheirwritingbetter.
Inthischapterweprovideafewcoreskillstohelpnewandimprovingwriters.Most pointsarebetterillustratedinthecontextofspecificpapersections,andwedon’twant tofront-loadthisbookwithtoomanyguidelinesthatneedtoberemembered.Consequently,inthischapter,wefocusonasmallnumberofpointsthatcanbeappliedin everysectionofapaper.
Weprovide:
• fourgeneralprinciples;
• ourtop10specifictips.
Remember—thesearenothardandfastrules,justtipstomakescientificwritingeasier andclearer.Wereturntoalloftheminlaterchapters,whendiscussinghowtowrite specificsectionsofapaper.Theunitingthemeistoproducesimple,unclutteredwriting withaclearnarrativeflow.
FourGeneralPrinciples Keepitsimple
Whenstudentsfirststartwritingpapers,theyoftenseemtotakeonastylethattheythink makesthemsoundlikeascientist.Thiscanincludeusingjargon,technicalabbreviations, andphrasesthattheywouldneveruseineverydayspeech.Butthiskindofwritingmakes thingsharder,noteasier,forpotentialreaders,andmaydiscouragethemfromcarrying onwithyourpaper.
Itisyourjobtoattractabroadrangeofreaderstoyourpaperandtomakeitas easyaspossibleforthemtounderstandwhatyoufoundout.Simple,clearwritingis fundamentaltothistask.Insteadoftryingtosoundscientificorclever,youshouldbe clearandconcise.Thisisnoteasy—itcansometimesbehardertoexplainscientific
conceptsusingplainEnglishthanbyusingtechnicallanguage.But,ifyoupersevere,it willstarttocomemorenaturally.Inthelaterchaptersweprovidenumerousexamples ofovercomplicatedwriting,andhowtomakeitsimpler.
Assumenothing
Stepbackandputyourselfinthepositionofthereader.Tounderstandyourpaper,the readerneedsanexplanationofallthenecessarysteps.But‘necessary’onlymakessense inthecontextofwhattheyalreadyknow.Andit’seasytoassumethatyourreaderknows muchmoreaboutthetopicthantheyactuallydo.
Evenanexpertinyoursubjectlacksspecificknowledgeaboutwhatyouhavedoneand whyyouhavedoneit.Incontrast,youhavebeenthinkingaboutyourworkformonths— maybeevenyears—onanalmostdailybasis.Youwillbeincrediblyknowledgeableabout everydetailofyourwork:fromtheotherstudiesthatinspiredyou,towhatyouactually didandfoundout—anditsimplications.Youwillhaveforgottenallthehoursthatyou investedinunderstandingthesedifferentaspectsofyourwork.Indeed,youareprobably theworstpersontowriteupyourstudy,becauseyouareasfarawayasit’spossibleto befromsomeonewhoisnewtothetopic.
Thisproblemissocommonthatithasevenbeengivenanameinthepsychologyand economicsliterature:the‘curseofknowledge’.1 Thecursemeansthat,whencommunicatingwithothers,peopletendtounwittinglyassumethatothershavethenecessary backgroundtounderstandwhattheyaresaying.It’stooeasytomissoutcrucialpointsor stepsbecauseyouhaveforgottenhowimportanttheyareforunderstandingyourwork.
So,howcanwetacklethecurseofknowledge?Whenwritingapaper,it’sbestto assumethatyourreaderisscientificallyliterate,buthasverylittleexpertknowledge.Your paperismorelikelytofailbecauseyouassumedtoomuch,thanbecauseyoudumbed itdowntoomuch.Thisisespeciallytrueforinterdisciplinaryscience,wheredifferent readerscanhavecompletelydifferentbackgrounds.
Remember—youneedtogothroughallofthecrucialpoints,stepbystep,takingyour readerwithyou.Inthefollowingchapterswewillprovideatoolkittohelpyoudothis, byprovidingstructuresforthedifferentpapersectionsthatforceyoutocoverthekey pointsneededforthereader.
Keepittoessentials
Let’sassumethatyouknowalot,andhaveopinionsaboutmanythings.Butwhichfacts andopinionsdoyoureallyneedtoincludeinyourpaper?IsadigressionontopicX orYnecessaryorrelevant?Authorsareoftentemptedtoaddmoretotheirpapersto showhowmuchtheyknowortogivetheiropinionaboutsomething.Butthisisn’tan opportunitytotelltheworldwhatyouknoworthinkaboutabroadrangeoftopics. Instead,wesuggestthatyoustripyourscientificwritingdowntothebareessentials (minimalism).Thisdoesn’tmeanmakingthepapersoshortthatitdoesn’tdoitsjob
1 Camerer etal. 1987.Thecurseofknowledgeineconomicsettings:anexperimentalanalysis. Journalof PoliticalEconomy.97:1232–1254
properly.It’simportanttoincludealltheinformationthat’s necessary tounderstandthe paper—butnomore.
Editingapapersothatitincludes‘justenough’isactuallyalotharderthanwriting alongerpaper.Butit’sworththeeffort,becauseashorterpaperhelpsthereader.If youfocusonthemainmessage,andremovealldistractions,thenthereaderwillcome awaywiththemessagethatyouwantthemtohave.Unfortunately,mostreaderswill onlyeverabsorbaverysmallfractionofwhatyouhavewritten.Sotrytohammerhome themessagesthatyoumostwantyourreadertotakeaway.Brevityalsominimizesthe likelihoodthatyoulosetheattentionofyourtime-stressedreader.Peoplearemorelikely tostartreading—andtofinish—shorterpapers.
Tellyourstory
Goodscientificwritingtellsastory.Ittellsthereaderwhythetopicyouhavechosenis important,whatyoufoundout,andwhythatmatters.Forthestorytoflowsmoothly, thedifferentpartsneedtolinkclearlytoeachother.Increativewritingthisiscalled ‘narrativeflow’.
Ifyourpaperhasnarrativeflow,thereaderwillbegentlyledfromonesectiontothe next,excitedtofindoutwhathappensnext.Themainpointswillbeclearandtheywill graspthem.Ifyourwritingdoesn’thavenarrativeflow,thereaderwillgetconfused—and verypossiblyfrustrated.
Thisadvicemightseemrathervagueatthemoment,butinthelaterchapterswewill provideastructureforeachchapter,whichwillleadtonarrativeflow.
Top10Tips
Writeasyouspeak
Scientistsoftentendtowritephrasesthattheywouldneversay,possiblybecausethey thinktheyneedto‘soundscientific’.Instead,youshouldexplainyourscienceinthe clearestpossibleway,usingsimpleEnglishwheneverpossible.Ifyouneversaytheword ‘whilst’whenspeakingtofriends,thendon’tusethatwordinyourpaper. Keepitsimple Compare:
1. Weassignedbirdstotwoexperimentalgroups,wherewemanipulatedthenutritional resourcestodifferentlevels.
2. Wedividedthebirdsintotwogroups,whichreceivedsmallorlargeamountsof food.
1. Theseresultssuggestthatwormsactasrationalagents,abletoincreasetheirDarwinianfitnessbyadjustingtheirbasicreproductiverateconditionallyinresponseto environmentalconditions.
2. Theresultssuggestthatwhenthereismorefoodavailable,wormslaymoreeggs.
Cartoon2.1 Therobottest. Agoodwayto‘test’yourwritingistoreaditoutloud.Thisisaneasy waytorevealcommonerrors,suchastoomuchjargon,orsentencesthataretooshortortoolong.Often, badwritingwillmakeyousoundlikearobot.
Inbothexamples,sentence2iswritteninsimplerEnglish,andisshorterandeasierto understand.Agoodtestofwhetheryouhavegotitrightistoreadyoursentenceout loud(Cartoon2.1).Inbothoftheexamplesabove,it’shardtonotsoundlikearobot whenreadingoutsentence1,whereassentence2willsoundmorenatural.
Writeshortsentences,whichonlymakeonepoint
Shortsentenceswithclearandsimpleconstructionsareeasiertoreadandgrasp.Readers normallyholdawholesentenceintheirhead,astheytrytomakesenseofit.So,ifyou puttoomuchintoonesentence,theywillfindithardtoprocessandmayhavetore-read itmultipletimes.Consequently,putoneidea/pointpersentence,andconsiderbreaking alongsentenceintotwoormoreshorterones.Compare:
1. Afterharvestingallplantsanddryingtheminanovenat80 ◦Cfor24hoursweweighed themonamicrobalancetothenearest0.1gandthencarriedoutCHNanalysisto determinetheproportionsofmajorelementsafterwhichweransmallsamplesthrough HPLCtoobtainafullchemicalprofile.
2. Afterharvestingallplantsanddryingtheminanovenat80 ◦Cfor24hoursweweighed themonamicrobalancetothenearest0.1g.Todeterminetheproportionsofmajor elementswecarriedoutCHNanalysis.Toobtainafullchemicalprofileweransmall samplesthroughHPLC.
1. Asacontrol,wemadeallindividualsplayasingleroundofthesamegamebutwith computerizedgroupmates,ratherthanwithrealhumans,inordertotestwhethertheir behaviourdependsuponconcernsforthewelfareofothers.
2. Asacontrol,wemadeallindividualsplayasingleroundofthesamegamebutwith computerizedgroupmates,ratherthanwithrealhumans.Thiscontroltestswhether behaviourdependsuponconcernsforthewelfareofothers.
Asaruleofthumb,ifasentenceis>2lineslonginsomethinglikeMicrosoftWord, thenalarmbellsshouldgooff.Lookatthatsentenceandthinkaboutwhetheritneeds tobesplitintomultiplesentences.Orreaditoutloud—itwillquicklybecomeobvious ifyouhaveputtoomuchin.Ofcourse,atthesametime,don’tmaketoomanyofyour sentencestooshort—wewillreturntothispointinChapter3.
Avoidjargon
AcrucialpartofwritinginsimpleunderstandableEnglishistoavoidjargon.Other peoplemightusejargondifferently,ornotunderstanditall.Peoplesometimesusejargon tosoundcleverorscientific—ormaybetheyeventhinktheyhaveto.Butjargonputs readersoff.Thisproblemhasevenbeenquantified—paperswithmorejargonareless likelytobecited.2
ItcanbeharderandmoreworktowriteapaperinsimpleEnglish,withoutjargon, butyourpaperwillhaveawideraudience.Compare:
1. Inmicrobialsystems,intraspecificcompetitionisinducedbystressfulconditionssuchas resourceorspacelimitation.
2. Bacteriacompeteforspaceandresources.
1. Theevolutionarylegacyhypothesisproposesthatanevolvedreciprocity-basedpsychologyaffectshumanbehaviourinanonymousone-shotinteractionswhenreciprocityisnot explicitlypossible.
2. Ithasbeenhypothesizedthathumanscooperatemoreiftheyfeeltheyarebeingwatched.
1. Welistedalltheinformationregardingthefullgenomeanalysisofthestrainsusedin thiscompetitionassayinTable1.
2. WelistedallmutationsinTable1.
Insentence2,thejargonfromsentence1hasbeenreplacedwithsimpleEnglish,making itmucheasiertounderstand.Bewarned—it’seasytogetsuckedintowritingjargon— eachsentence1istakenfromarealpaper.
Sometimesavoidingjargonisrelative.Forexample,infieldssuchasimmunology, thereisalotofjargonthatcannotbeavoided.Whenwritinganimmunologypaper, avoidingjargonmeansavoidingtermsthataren’tbroadlyunderstoodbyimmunologists.Similarly,mostfieldsofresearchwillinvolvesomestandardtermsthatareusedby
2 Martinez&Mammola.2021.Specializedterminologyreducesthenumberofcitationsofscientificpapers. ProceedingsoftheRoyalSocietyLondonSeriesB 288:20202581
everyone.Thegeneraltipistoavoidtermsthatwillonlybeknownbyanarrowsetof specialists.Inthisbookwehavedeliberatelyusedsimpleillustrativeexamplesthatcan beunderstoodbyallreaders.
Atothertimesyoumightwanttousejargon,tomakelinkstootherliteratureclear.In thiscase,youcanstillwriteinsimpleEnglish,butthenaddthejargon,eitherinbrackets orbyexplainingit.Forexample:
1. Humansoftenfaceopportunitiestoimprovethewelfareoftheirgroup,butatacostto theindividual(‘socialdilemmas’).
2. Humansoftenfacesocialdilemmas,wheretheycanimprovethewelfareoftheirgroup, butatanindividualcost.
Writecausebeforeeffect
Manysentencesinscientificpaperscontainacauseandaneffect.Youmightdescribe whatyoudid(cause)andtheconsequence(effect),orvariationinsomething(cause) andwhatthisledto(effect).Youcanhelpthereaderbyputtingthecausefirst,followed bytheeffect.Compare:
1. Morematingswithfemalesareobtainedbymalepeacockswithlargertails.
2. Malepeacockswithlargertailsmatedwithmorefemales.
1. Femaleslaidmoreeggswhentheywerelarger.
2. Largerfemaleslaidmoreeggs.
1. Supernatantscontainednoliveordeadcells,onlyexoproductsproducedbythecellsin theoriginalculture,astheywereproducedusinga0.22μmfilter.
2. Thesupernatantwasproducedwitha0.22μmfilter,andsocontainednoliveordead cells,onlyexoproductsproducedbythecellsintheoriginalculture.
Inallcases,sentence2presentsthecausefirst,followedbytheeffect.Thishelpsbecause thecauseexplainstheeffect.Ifyoudoittheotherwayaround—effectandthencause— thereadermighthavetogobackandreassesstheeffectafterreadingthecause,perhaps byrereadingthesentence.Writingcausebeforeeffectmakesthesentenceeasierto process.
Makeonemajorpointperparagraph
Eachparagraphshouldmakeonemajorpoint.Thepurposeofparagraphsistobreak thetextupintomanageableunits,sothatthereadercangraspthemainpoints.Ifa paragraphcontainsjustonemajorpoint,thenitwillstandoutclearly.Ifitcontains morethanone,thenthemainmessageislost,andthereadercanbecomeconfused. Atypicalsizeforaparagraphwouldbethreetoeightsentences.Wewillprovide
CoreSkills 13
examplesofgoodandbadparagraphsinlaterchapters,whendiscussingspecific sections.
Usethefirstsentenceofaparagraphtosummarizethat paragraph
Itisoftenusefultomakethefirstsentenceofaparagraphasummaryofthemajorpoint ofthatparagraph.Therestofthatparagraphthenprovidesthedetails,whichcouldrange fromadetailedexplanationtostatisticalanalyses.Thefirstsentencegivesthereaderthe keypointupfront,andittellsthemwhatthatparagraphisgoingtobeabout.Theythen knowwheretheyaregoingandwillbeatease.
Ifdonewell,thecollectionoffirstsentenceswillprovideausefulsummaryofyour paper.Totestyourself,onceyouhavewrittenasection,orawholepaper,readjustthe firstsentencesofeachparagraph.Askyourselfwhetherareaderthatonlyreadthose firstsentenceswouldobtainareasonableunderstanding(Box 2.1).Theanswershould be yes
Readerswilloftenloseconcentrationinaparagraphorjustskimthroughapaper.If yousummarizeeachparagraphwiththefirstsentence,thentheywillstillgetthemain points,evenifthatisalltheyread.Makeitaseasyasyoucanforyourreaders.
Bepreciseandconsistent
It’sofparamountimportancetobeprecise,especiallywithtermsanddefinitions.This sometimesmeansthatyouhavetosacrificevarietyoflanguageforprecision.For example,ifyouhavedoneanecologyfieldexperiment,andyoubeginbystatingthat youhave‘plots’of2mby2m,thenfortherestofthepaperyoumustalwaysreferto themasplots.Don’tsometimescallthem‘patches’.It’ssurprisinglyeasytousedifferent
Box2.1 CompletetheFirstSentenceExercise
wordstorefertothesamethingindifferentpartsofyourpaper,soyouneedtoactively avoidthis.
Youshouldalsobeconsistentwithterminologyacrosstheexistingliterature.Ifother papersuseaterminaspecificway,andyouuseitdifferently,itwillspreadconfusionand hinderprogress.3 Scienceisprecise.Scientificprogressdependsuponprecise,reliable communicationbetweenscientists.
Followthesectionheadings
Theheadingofeachsectionofapaperprovidesamajorclueastowhatyoushould include.TheIntroductionisforintroducingwhyyourpaperisneeded,theMethodsis formethods,andsoon.Havingseparatesectionshelpsthereader,becausetheyknow whattoexpectineachsection.Inaddition,thedifferentsectionsprovideinformationin alogicalorder:whyyoucarriedoutyourstudy(Introduction),whatyoudid(Methods), whatyoufoundout(Results),andwhatthosefindingsmean(Discussion).Eachofthese sectionsfollowsonnicelyfromthepreviousone,andleadsneatlyintothenext.
Ifyouputthe‘wrong’bitsinasectionthenyouareeitherbeingrepetitiveoryoudidn’t doagoodenoughjobintheappropriatesection.Forexample,yourDiscussionsection shouldn’tstartwithalongintroductionastowhyyourworkwasneeded—thatbelongs inthe‘Introduction’.Puttingthingsinthewrongsectioncanconfuseorfrustrateyour reader.
Followingthesectionheadingsdoesn’tmeanthattherecanbenorepetitionofelementsbetweensections.Linkingbetweensectionscanhelpthereader.Inlaterchapters wewillsuggestwhenitisusefultorepeatelementsorsummarizepointsfromother sections.
Plan,plan,plan!
Itcanbehardtostartwriting.Ablankpagecanbeverydaunting.Somewriterstackle thisproblembyfocusingon‘gettingsomethingdown’.Theideahereisthatithelpsto getstarted,andthatonceyouhavesomethingdown,youcanplaywithitandhoneit intosomethinggreat.Wesuggesttheoppositeapproach.
Wesuggestplanningeachsectionasmuchaspossible,beforewritingit.Forthe sectionofthepaperthatyouwanttowrite,beginbywritingdownthebulletpoints thatneedtobecovered.Forexample,fortheIntroduction,writedownthekeyinformationaboutwhyyourpaperisneeded,orfortheMethods,writedowntheessentialsteps inyourprotocol.
Itisoftenbettertoplanwithpenandpaper.Youcanthenplaywiththedifferent bulletpoints,orderingandlinkingthemwithaflowdiagram(mindmap)toproduce
3 West etal.2007.Socialsemantics:altruism,cooperation,mutualism,strongreciprocityandgroup selection. JournalofEvolutionaryBiology 20:415–432.
Cartoon2.2 Plan,plan,plan! Itisoftenusefultoplanwithapenandpaper.
thestructureofeachsection(Cartoon 2.2).Addextrabulletpointsasneeded.Each bulletpointwillusuallycorrespondtooneparagraphandprovidethemajorpointof thatparagraph.Giventhatthefirstsentenceofeachparagraphshouldsummarizethat paragraph(page13),yourbulletpointswillbeveryclosetothefirstsentenceofeach paragraph.
Onceyouhavethefirstsentenceofeachparagraph,youjustneedtoaddtherestof eachparagraphbyelaboratingonthatfirstsentence.Andoncethatisdone,youwill havefinishedwritingthatsectionofyourpaper!Inthelaterchaptersofthisbook,we willprovidemorespecifictoolkitsforplanningthestructureofeachsectionofapaper.
Ouremphasishereistoseparatetheplanningfromtheactualwriting.Wesuggest doingthisforthreereasons.First,ifyoujumpstraightin,youarelikelytoproducea disorganizedstreamofconsciousnessthatissouselessitisprobablybettertothrow itawayandstartagainanyway.Second,planninginadvanceallowsformuchclearer thought:youjustneedtoplanandorganizethebigpicture,withoutgettinglostinthe details.Third,onceyouhaveactualtextdown,itcanbehardtochangeit—youhave madetheefforttotypeitin,soyoudon’twanttojustthrowitaway.Thisisalsosowell knownthatpsychologistshaveaphraseforit:the‘sunkcostfallacy’.
Themethodofbuildingupfromaflowdiagrammightfeelslow,butitcanbeeasier andfasterinthelongrun.Ifyoustartbybuildingupaplan,andbygraduallyfleshingit out,youwillendupwithsomethingmuchclosertoafinalversion.Intheend,thismeans feweriterationsandcorrections.Youwillstillhavetotweakyourpaperandimproveit, butyouareunlikelytohavetothrowitoutandstartagain.
Goodplanningcanalsohelpwiththecurseofknowledge.Onpage8,weemphasized theimportanceofsteppingbackandputtingyourselfinthereader’splace.Planning involvessteppingbackandthinkingaboutthebigpicture.Atthisstage,it’smucheasier tothinkaboutwhatyouneedtoexplaintothereader.Considerallthelogicalsteps thatareobvioustoyou,butmightnotbeobvioustosomeonewhohasn’tspentthelast
Cartoon2.3 Thegoldenrule. Youcanignoretips—dowhateverhelpsyourreader.
fewyearsburiedinthetopic. Goodplanningwillhelpyouwritefaster,andproducebetter papers.
Youcanignoretheabovetips
Followingthetipsinthisbookwillgenerallyleadtoclearerwriting.Butwecannot emphasizeenoughthattheyareonlytips,nothardandfastrules.Sometimesitcanbe betternottofollowthem—thegoldenruleisthatthereadermustcomefirst(Cartoon 2.3). Dowhateverhelpsyourreader!
Togiveanexample,itcansometimesbeusefultodeviatefromTopTip4,andput theeffectbeforethecause.Compare:
1. Bacterialpathogensproducetoxinstoeliminatecompetitors,allowingthemtogrow better.
2. Thegrowthofbacterialpathogensdependsupontheirabilitytoeliminatecompetitors withtoxins.
Sentence2putstheeffectbeforethecause,butthisordermightworkbestifwewanted toputthefocusonpathogengrowth.Thiscandependuponthepurposeofthesentence withinthecontextoftheoverallsection.However,youdon’thavetoagreewithus—the pointisthatthereisnoabsolutelywrongandrightwaytodothis.It’ssimplyimportant tothinkaboutdifferentpossibilities,andtodowhatyouthinkwillmakethingseasiest foryourreader.Wehavetriedtofollowourownrecomendationsinthisbook,butwe arefallible,andsowillhaveoccasionallyfailed.
Summary
Greatguidetowonderfulwriting
Generalprinciples
1.Keepitsimple
2.Assumenothing
3.Keepittoessentials
4.Tellyourstory
Top10tips
1.Writeasyouspeak
2.Writeshortsentences,whichonlymakeonepoint
3.Avoidjargon
4.Writecausebeforeeffect
5.Makeonemajorpointperparagraph
6.Usethefirstsentenceofaparagraphtosummarizethatparagraph
7.Bepreciseandconsistent
8.Followthesectionheadings
9.Plan,plan,plan!
10.Youcanignoretheabovetips
BeforereadingChapter3,summarizethemainpointsofthischapter(Box2.2)and taketheMethodsquiz(Box2.3).
Box2.2 MindMaps
Afterreadingthischapter,makeamindmaptosummarizethepoints.Trytomakeitinaway thatwouldprovideausefulsummary,tosaveyouhavingtoreadthischapteragain.Repeat thisexerciseforeachchapter,asyouworkthroughthebook.
Box2.3 TaketheMethodsQuizbeforereadingChapter3
