Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the following for permission to reproduce copyright material:
Figures
Figure 10.1 from Land Registry, Official copy of register of title, title number CS705289, edition date 19.11.2008. © Crown copyright 2011 HMLR. Reproduced with kind permission of Land Registry; Figure 10.2 from Land Registry, Official copy of title plan, title number CS705289, Ordnance Survey map reference TL2467SW. © Crown copyright 2011 HMLR. Reproduced with kind permission of Land Registry.
Text
Extract 1.1.1 from ‘Before we begin’ by Peter Birks (footnotes omitted) in Land Law: Themes and Perspectives, 1 ed., Oxford University Press (Bright, S. and Dewar, J. (eds.) 1998) pp. 457–63, 467–8, 470–3, 476–86, by permission of Oxford University Press; Extract 1.1.2 from ‘The idea of property in land’ by Kevin Gray and Susan Francis Gray (footnotes omitted) in Land Law: Themes and Perspectives, 1 ed., Oxford University Press (Bright, S. and Dewar, J. (eds.) 1998) pp. 15–16, 18–21, 27–31, 35–40, 51, by permission of Oxford University Press; Extract 1.2.1 from Property and Justice (some footnotes omitted) 3rd ed., Oxford University Press (Harris, J. W. 1996) pp. 149–51, by permission of Oxford University Press; Extract 1.3.1 from Equity: A course of lectures, Edited by A.H. Chaytor, W.J. Whittaker, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press (Maitland, F. W. 1936) pp. 23, 30–1, 117, 129, 139, 147–9, 153, 158 © Cambridge University Press 1909, 1936, reproduced with permission; Extract 1.3.2 from Baker v Archer-Shee [1927] AC 844, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 865–6, 870, 877 The Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales (ICLR); Extract 2.2.1 from X v Y (2004) ICR 1634, Industrial Case Reports, [43–5], [49], [66] ICLR; Extract 2.3.1 from Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] 3, WLR 1441 (Supreme Court) ICLR; Extract 3.1.1 from The Law of Property, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press (Lawson, F. H. and Rudden, B. 2002) pp. 77–80, 90, by permission of Oxford University Press; Extract 3.1.2 from Lord Bernstein of Leigh v Skyviews & General Ltd. [1978] QB 479, Law Reports, Queen’s Bench, pp. 485–8 ICLR; Extract 3.1.6 from Re Macleay (1875) LR 20 EQ 186, Law Reports, Equity Cases, pp. 188–90 ICLR; Extract 3.1.7 from Re Rosher (1884) 26 Ch D 801, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 816–19 ICLR; Extract 3.1.11 from Blathwayt v Baron Cawley [1976] AC 397, Law Reports Appeals Cases, pp. 424–25 ICLR; Extract 3.1.18 from National Provincial Bank Ltd. v Ainsworth [1965] AC 1175, Law Reports Appeals Cases, pp. 1247–9 ICLR; Extract 4.1.7 from Parker v British Airways Board [1982] QB 1004, Law Reports, Queen’s Bench, pp. 1008–114, 1017–19 ICLR; Extract 4.1.8 from Waverley BC v Fletcher [1996] QB 334, Law Reports, Queen’s Bench, pp. 340–5 ICLR; Extract 4.2.2 from J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd v Graham [2000] Ch 676, Law Reports, Chancery Division, p. 710 ICLR;
Extract 4.2.8 from Buckinghamshire CC v Moran [1990] Ch 623, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 635–43 ICLR; Extracts 4.2.10, 4.2.13 from J A Pye (Oxford) Ltd v Graham [2003] 1 AC 419, Law Reports Appeal Cases, [31], [35–8], [40], [45] ICLR; Extract 4.2.21 from St Marylebone Property Co Ltd v Fairweather [1963] AC 510, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 534–40 ICLR; Extract 4.3.2 from Holland v Hodgson (1872) LR 7 CP 328, Law Reports, Common Pleas Cases, pp. 334–40 ICLR; Extract 4.3.4 from D’Eyncourt v Gregory (1866) LR 3 EQ 382, Law Reports: Equity Cases, pp. 395–7, 691–3 ICLR; Extract 4.3.7 from TSB Bank plc v Botham [1996] EGCS 149, Estates Gazette Case Summaries, Reed Business Information; Extract 5.2.2 from Pitt v PHH Asset Management Ltd. [1994] 1 WLR 327, Weekly Law Reports, pp. 332–3 ICLR; Extract 5.2.5 from Spiro v Glencrown Properties Ltd [1991] Ch 537, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 541–6 ICLR; Extract 5.2.8 from North Eastern Properties Ltd v Coleman [2010] 1 WLR 2715 (Court of Appeal), Weekly Law Reports, ICLR; Extract 5.2.9 from Commission for the New Towns v Cooper (Great Britain) Ltd [1995] Ch 259, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 284–5 ICLR; Extract 5.2.11 from Yaxley v Gotts [2000] Ch 162, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 174–7, 180–2, 190–1, 193 ICLR; Extract 5.2.12 from Kinane v Mackie-Conteh [2005] WTLR 345, Wills and Trusts Law Report, [22–4], [26–9], [32], [39–41], [44–9], [51], Headnotes reprinted with permission from Legalease Limited; Extract 5.2.13 from Cobbe v Yeoman’s Row Management Ltd [2008] 1 WLR 1752, Weekly Law Reports, ICLR; Extract 5.3.4 from Long v Tower Hamlets LBC [1998] Ch 197, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 208, 211–12, 215–17 ICLR; Extract 5.4.4 from Cochrane v Moore (1890) 25 QBD 57, Law Reports, Queen’s Bench Division, pp. 534–40 ICLR; Extract 5.4.8 from Re Cole [1964] Ch 175, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 183–92 ICLR; Extract 5.5.4 from Government of Newfoundland v Newfoundland Railway Co (1888) 13 App Cas 199, Law Reports, Appeals Cases, pp. 210–13 ICLR; Extract 5.5.5 from Stoddart v Union Trust Ltd [1912] 1 KB 181, Law Reports, King’s Bench pp. 188–9 ICLR; Extract 5.5.6 from Holt v Heatherfield Trust Ltd [1942] 2 KB 1, Law Reports, King’s Bench pp. 2–3, 11–13 ICLR; Extract 5.5.7 from Ward v Duncombe [1893] AC 369, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 376–7, 392–4 ICLR; Extract 5.6.10 from Vandervell v IRC [1967] 2 AC 291, Law Reports, Appeal Courts, pp. 310–11, 317–18, 330 ICLR; Extract 5.6.11 from Neville v Wilson [1997] Ch 144, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 157–8 ICLR; Extract 6.2.4 from Sekhon v Alissa [1989] 2 FLR 94, Family Law Reports, pp. 98–9 © Jordan Publishing Ltd; Extract 6.2.7 from Tinsley v Milligan [1994] 1 AC 340, Law Reports, Appeal Cases, pp. 371–2 ICLR; Extract 6.2.9 from Bannister v Bannister [1948] 2 All ER 133, All England Law Reports, pp. 135–6 Reproduced by permission of Reed Elsevier (UK) Limited, trading as Lexis Nexis; Extract 6.2.10 from Hodgson v Marks [1971] Ch 892, Law Reports, Chancery Division, p. 933 ICLR; Extract 6.2.11 from Binions v Evans [1972] Ch 359, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 368–9 ICLR; Extract 6.2.12 from Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold [1989] Ch 1, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 22–6 ICLR; Extract 7.1.1 from Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Co Ltd [1982] QB 133, Law Reports, Queen’s Bench, pp. 143–55 ICLR; Extracts 7.1.2, 7.2.2 from Crabb v Arun DC [1976] Ch 179, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 192–9 ICLR; Extract 7.1.3 from Gillett v Holt [2001] Ch 210, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 222, 227–8, 230–1, 232, 235 ICLR; Extract 7.1.4 from Cobbe v Yeoman’s Row Management Ltd [2008] 1 WLR 1752, Weekly Law Reports, [2–4], [7], [10], [14–17], [20], [25], [28], [29], [40–2], [59], [63], [66–8], [79], [81] ICLR; Extract 7.1.5 from Thorner v Major [2009] 1 WLR 776, Weekly Law Reports, ICLR; Extract 7.1.6 from Greasley v Cooke [1980] 1 WLR 1306, Weekly Law Reports, pp. 1311–12 ICLR; Extract 7.1.7 from Coombes v Smith [1986] 1 WLR 808, Weekly
Acknowledgements
Law Reports, pp. 819–21 ICLR; Extract 7.2.3 from Pascoe v Turner [1979] 1 WLR 431, Weekly Law Reports, pp. 435–9 ICLR; Extract 7.2.4 from Baker v Baker & Baker [1993] 2 FLR 247, Family Law Reports, pp. 410–13 © Jordan Publishing Ltd.; Extract 7.4.7 from Pennington v Waine [2002] 1 WLR 2075, Weekly Law Reports, [52], [54], [56], [58–60], [63–6] ICLR; Extract 7.4.9 from Re Innes [1910] 1 Ch 188, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 192–3 ICLR; Extract 8.1.1 from Goodman v Gallant [1986] Fam 106, Law Reports, Family Division, pp. 110–11, 116–17 ICLR; Extract 8.2.1 from Stack v Dowden [2007] 2 AC 432, Law Reports, Appeal Cases, [53–6], [58–60], [61–2], [63], [66–9], [70], [75], [92], [93–4], [101–2], [106–7], [114–15] ICLR; Extract 8.2.2 from Fowler v Barron [2008] 2 FLR 831, Family Court Reports, [33], [41], [44], [46–7] Lexis Nexis, Reproduced by permission of Reed Elsevier (UK) Limited trading as Lexis Nexis; Extracts 8.2.3, 8.4.3, 8.4.16 and 8.4.17 from Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53, www.supremecourt.gov.uk/decided-cases/docs/ UKSC_2010_0130_Judgment.pdf, [13, 19, 22, 25, 29, 31, 32, 33, 34, 46, 47, 48, 50, 51, 52, 72, 77, 87, 88, 89] © Crown Copyright 2011; Extract 8.3.1 from Gissing v Gissing [1971] AC 886, Law Reports, Appeal Cases, pp. 903–9 ICLR; Extract 8.4.4 from Stack v Dowden [2007] 2 AC 432, Law Reports, Appeal Cases, [20–1], [125–7] ICLR; Extract 8.4.6 from Burns v Burns [1984] Ch 317, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 327–31 ICLR; Extract 8.4.7 from Lloyds Bank plc v Rosset [1991] 1 AC 107, Law Reports, Appeal Cases, pp. 131–3 ICLR; Extract 8.4.10 from Jansen v Jansen [1965] P 478, Law Reports, Probate Division, pp. 489, 494 ICLR; Extract 8.4.11 from Pettitt v Pettitt [1970] AC 777, Law Reports, Appeal Cases, pp. 818, 825–6 ICLR; Extract 8.4.13 from Grant v Edwards [1986] Ch 638, Law Reports, Chancery Division pp. 656–8 ICLR; Extract 8.4.14 from Oxley v Hiscock [2005] Fam 211, Law Reports, Family Division, [4], [15–16], [19], [23–4], [48], [53–5], [57–8], [60–2], [64–5], [68–71], [74] ICLR; Extract 8.4.15 from Stack v Dowden [2007] 2 AC 432, Law Reports, Appeal Cases, [61–2] ICLR; Extract 8.4.18 from Stack v Dowden [2007] 2 AC 432, Law Reports, Appeal Cases, [4–5], [42], [44–6] ICLR; Extract 8.5.1 from Hammond v Mitchell [1991] 1 WLR 1127, Weekly Law Reports, pp. 1129–30, 1139 ICLR; Extract 8.6.1 from Grant v Edwards [1986] Ch 638, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 646–9 ICLR; Extracts 8.6.3, 12.2.7 from Stack v Dowden [2007] 2 AC 432, Law Reports, Appeal Cases, [37] ICLR; Extract 9.1.2 from Walker v Linom [1907] 2 Ch 104, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 110–14 ICLR; Extract 9.2.1 from Equity: A course of lectures, Edited by A.H. Chaytor, W.J. Whittaker, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press (Maitland, Fredric W. 1936) pp. 113–15, 118–19 © Cambridge University Press 1909, 1936, reproduced with permission; Extract 9.2.6 from Hunt v Luck [1902] 1 Ch 428, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 432–5 ICLR; Extract 9.2.7 from Caunce v Caunce [1969] 1 WLR 286, Weekly Law Reports, pp. 289–94 ICLR; Extract 9.5.1 from Abbey National BS v Cann [1991] 1 AC 56, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 89–93, 101–2 ICLR; Extract 9.6.4 from Oak Co-operative Building Society v Blackburn [1968] Ch 730, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 742–3 ICLR; Extract 10.2.16 from Lyus v Prowsa Developments Ltd [1982] 1 WLR 1044, Weekly Law Reports, pp. 1054–5 ICLR; Extracts 10.2.19, 10.2.27 from Williams & Glyn’s Bank Ltd v Boland [1981] AC 487, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 503–9 ICLR; Extract 10.2.20 from National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth [1964] Ch 665; on appeal [1965] AC 1175, Law Reports, Chancery Division, [1964] Ch 665: p. 696; [1965] AC 1175: pp. 1259–61 ICLR; Extract 10.2.21 from Malory Enterprises Ltd v Cheshire Homes (UK) Ltd [2002] Ch 216, Law Reports, Chancery Division, [66–9] ICLR; Extract 10.2.22 from City of London BS v Flegg [1988] AC 54, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 86–91 ICLR; Extract 10.2.23 from Bristol & West BS v Henning [1985] 1 WLR 778, Weekly Law Reports, pp. 781–3 ICLR;
Extract 10.2.26 from Hodgson v Marks [1971] Ch 892, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 930–2 ICLR; Extract 10.2.28 from Lloyds Bank plc v Rosset [1989] Ch 350, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 376–8, 396–7, 403–5 ICLR; Extracts 10.2.29, 10.2.36 from Abbey National BS v Cann [1991] 1 AC 56, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 83, 88, 93–4 ICLR; Extract 10.2.32 from Kingsnorth Finance Co Ltd v Tizard [1986] 1 WLR 783 (Ch D), Weekly Law Reports, pp. 788, 792–5 ICLR; Extract 10.2.34 from Malory Enterprises Ltd v Cheshire Homes (UK) Ltd [2002] Ch 216, Law Reports, Chancery Division, [80], [82] ICLR; Extract 11.1.2 from Re Bate [1947] 2 All ER 418, All England Law Reports, pp. 418–21 Reproduced by permission of Reed Elsevier (U.K.) Limited, trading as Lexis Nexis; Extract 11.2.2 from Malayan Credit Ltd v Jack Chia-MPH Ltd [1986] AC 549 (PC), Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 559–61 ICLR; Extract 11.3.3 from Nielson-Jones v Fedden [1975] Ch 222, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 226, 228–31, 233–7 ICLR; Extract 11.3.4 from Burgess v Rawnsley [1975] Ch 429, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 438–40, 442–8 ICLR; Extract 11.3.5 from Harris v Goddard [1983] 1 WLR 1203, Weekly Law Reports, pp. 1208–10 ICLR; Extract 11.3.7 from Kinch v Bullard [1999] 1 WLR 423, Weekly Law Reports, pp. 426–31 ICLR; Extract 12.2.2 from Chan v Leung [2003] 1 FLR 23, Family Law Reports, [100–2] Jordan Publishing; Extract 12.2.4 from Rodway v Landy [2001] Ch 703, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 712–13 ICLR; Extract 12.2.8 from Murphy v Gooch [2007] 2 FLR 934 (Court of Appeal), Family Law Reports, [10–11], [14] Jordan Publishing; Extract 12.2.9 from French v Barcham [2009] 1 WLR 1124, Weekly Law Reports, ICLR; Extract 12.3.7 from Jones v Challenger [1961] 1 QB 176, Law Reports, Queen’s Bench, pp. 180–3 ICLR; Extract 12.3.10 from Re Evers’ Trust [1980] 1 WLR 1327, Weekly Law Reports, pp. 1333–4 ICLR; Extract 12.3.12 from Williams v Williams [1976] Ch 278, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 285–6 ICLR; Extract 12.3.14 from Re Citro [1991] Ch 142, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 147, 153–9 ICLR; Extract 12.3.18 from Barca v Mears [2005] 2 FLR 1 (Ch D), Family Law Reports, [32–3], [37–43] Jordan Publishing; Extract 12.3.20 from Abbey National plc v Moss [1994] 1 FLR 307, Family Law Reports, pp. 316–17 © Jordan Publishing Ltd.; Extract 12.3.21 from Mortgage Corpn v Shaire [2001] Ch 743, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 756–64 ICLR; Extract 12.3.22 from Edwards v Lloyds TSB Bank plc [2005] 1 FCR 139, Family Court Reports, [29–33] Reproduced by permission of Reed Elsevier (U.K.) Limited, trading as Lexis Nexis; Extract 12.4.2 from State Bank of India v Sood [1997] Ch 276, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 281–8, 290 ICLR; Extract 12.4.3 from City of London BS v Flegg [1988] AC 54, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 71–4, 74–81, 83 ICLR; Extract 12.4.5 from Harpum [1990] CLJ 277, Cambridge Law Journal, pp. 329–31 Cambridge University Press; Extract 14.1.5 from Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body [1992] 2 AC 386, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 390–7 ICLR; Extract 14.1.6 from Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd v Berrisford [2011] 2 WLR 423, Weekly Law Reports, ICLR; Extract 14.1.8 from Street v Mountford [1985] AC 809, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 816–27 ICLR; Extracts 14.1.10, 14.1.22 from AG Securities v Vaughan [1990] 1 AC 417, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 458–62, 465, 470–2 ICLR; Extract 14.1.11 from Aslan v Murphy [1990] 1 WLR 766, Weekly Law Reports, pp. 770–6 ICLR; Extract 14.1.14 from Westminster City Council v Clarke [1992] 2 AC 288, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 300–2 ICLR; Extract 14.1.17 from Hilton v Plustitle Ltd [1989] 1 WLR 149, Weekly Law Reports, pp. 153–5 ICLR; Extract 14.1.20 from Norris v Checksfield [1991] 1 WLR 1241, Weekly Law Reports, pp. 160 ICLR; Extract 14.1.23 from Mikeover Ltd v Brady [1989] 3 All ER 618, All England Law Reports, pp. 625–7 Reproduced by permission of Reed Elsevier (U.K.) Limited, trading as Lexis Nexis; Extract 14.2.1 from Hammersmith
Acknowledgements
and Fulham LBC v Monk [1992] 1 AC 478, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 482–5, 488–91 ICLR; Extract 14.2.2 from Javad v Aqil [1991] 1 WLR 1007, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 1011–13, 1016–17 ICLR; Extract 14.2.4 from Queen’s Club Gardens Estates Ltd v Bignell [1924] 1 KB 117, Law Reports, King’s Bench, pp. 123–6 ICLR; Extracts 14.2.12, 15.1.6 from Bruton v London & Quadrant Housing Trust [2000] 1 AC 406, Law Reports Appeal Cases, ICLR; Extract 14.2.15 from Caerphilly Concrete Products Ltd v Owen [1972] 1 WLR 372, Weekly Law Reports, pp. 374–7 ICLR; Extract 15.1.2 from National Carriers Ltd v Panalpina (Northern) Ltd [1981] AC 675, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 694–5, 701–2 ICLR; Extract 15.2.1 from Southwark LBC v Mills [2001] 1 AC 1, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 7–12, 26 ICLR; Extract 15.2.6 from Harmer v Jumbil (Nigeria) Tin Areas Ltd [1921] 1 Ch 200, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 221–3 ICLR; Extract 15.3.2 from Barrett v Lounova (1982) Ltd [1990] 1 QB 348, Law Reports, Queen’s Bench, pp. 358–9 ICLR; Extract 15.3.10 from Quick v Taff Ely BC [1986] QB 809, Law Reports, Queen’s Bench, pp. 817–20 ICLR; Extract 15.3.12 from O’Brien v Robinson [1973] AC 912, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 921–6 ICLR; Extract 15.3.15 from British Anzani (Felixstowe) Ltd v International Marine Management (UK) Ltd [1980] QB 137, Law Reports, Queen’s Bench, pp. 146–52 ICLR; Extracts 15.4.1, 15.4.19 from Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd [1992] 1 AC 494 (CA), Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 513, 516–17, 524–5, 534–40 ICLR; Extract 15.4.5 from Central Estates (Belgravia) Ltd v Woolgar (No 2) [1972] 1 WLR 1048, Weekly Law Reports, pp. 1051–2 ICLR; Extract 15.4.9 from Gill v Lewis [1956] 2 QB 1, Law Reports, Queen’s Bench, pp. 7, 9–10, 13 ICLR; Extracts on NOT NUMBERED – NO PAGE PROOF NUMBER, Extract 15.4.10 from Bland v Ingrams Estates Ltd (No 2) [2002] Ch 177, Law Reports, Chancery Division, [12–15] ICLR; Extract 15.4.12 from Rugby School (Governors) v Tannahill [1935] 1 KB 87, Law Reports, King’s Bench, pp. 90–1 ICLR; Extract 15.4.13 from Glass v Kencakes Ltd [1966] 1 QB 611, Law Reports, Queen’s Bench, pp. 623–4, 629 ICLR; Extract 15.4.14 from Expert Clothing Service & Sales Ltd v Hillgate House Ltd [1986] Ch 340, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 353–5 ICLR; Extract 15.4.16 from Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd [1992] 1 AC 494, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 513, 516–17, 524–5, 534–40 ICLR; Extract 15.4.17 from Escalus Properties Ltd v Robinson [1996] QB 231, Law Reports, Queen’s Bench, pp. 247–50 ICLR; Extract 15.4.20 from Chatham Empire Theatre (1955) Ltd v Ultrans Ltd [1961] 1 WLR 817, Weekly Law Reports, pp. 819–21 ICLR; Extract 15.4.21 from Ewart v Fryer [1901] 1 Ch 499, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 515–16 ICLR; Extract 15.4.25 from Jervis v Harris [1996] Ch 195, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 202–6 ICLR; Extract 16.1.1 from City of London Corporation v Fell [1994] 1 AC 458, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 464–5 ICLR; Extract 16.1.3 from Barrett v Morgan [2000] 2 AC 264, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 269–72 ICLR; Extracts NOT NUMBERED – NO PAGE PROOF NUMBER, 16.2.6 from Go West Ltd v Spigarolo [2003] QB 1140 (CA), Law Reports, Queen’s Bench, [31–4], [36], [38–40], [73] ICLR; Extract 16.2.7 from International Drilling Fluids Ltd v Louisville Investments (Uxbridge) Ltd [1986] Ch 513, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 519–21 ICLR; Extract 16.3.5 from BHP Petroleum Great Britain Ltd v Chesterfield Ltd [2002] Ch 194, Law Reports, Chancery Division, [46–7], [59], [61–2] ICLR; Extract 16.3.7 from P & A Swift Investments v Combined English Stores Group plc [1989] AC 632, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 640–2 ICLR; Extract 16.3.8 from Caerns Motor Services Ltd v Texaco Ltd [1994] 1 WLR 1249 (Ch D), Weekly Law Reports, pp. 1262 ICLR; Extract 16.3.9 from Kumar v Dunning [1989] QB 193, Law Reports, Queen’s Bench, pp. 205–6 ICLR; Extract 16.3.12 from Friends’ Provident Life Office v British Railways Board [1996] 1 All ER 336, All England Law Reports, pp. 341–51
Reproduced by permission of Reed Elsevier (U.K.) Limited, trading as Lexis Nexis; Extract 16.3.18 from London Diocesan Fund v Phithwa [2005] 1 WLR 3956, Weekly Law Reports, [10–14], [16–18], [21] ICLR; Extract 16.3.22 from City & Metropolitan Properties Ltd v Greycroft Ltd [1987] 1 WLR 1085 (Ch D), Weekly Law Reports, pp. 1086–8 ICLR; Extracts 18.1.1, 18.1.4 from Hurst v Picture Theatres Ltd [1915] 1 KB Law Reports, King’s Bench, pp. 5–7, 9–10, 18–19 ICLR; Extract 18.1.9 from National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth [1965] AC 1175, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 1253 ICLR; Extract 18.1.10 from Ashburn Anstalt v Arnold [1989] Ch 1, Law Reports, Chancery Division pp. 13–17, 21–2 ICLR; Extract 18.1.11 from Binions v Evans [1972] Ch 359, Law Reports, Chancery Division p. 368 ICLR; Extract 18.1.14 from Lloyds Bank plc v Carrick [1996] 4 All ER 630, All England Law Reports, pp. 641–42 Reproduced by permission of Reed Elsevier (U.K.) Limited, trading as Lexis Nexis; Extract 18.1.15 from Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Kingswood Motors (Addlestone) Ltd [1974] QB 142, Law Reports, Queen’s Bench, p. 156 ICLR; Extract 18.3.1 from Manchester Airport plc v Dutton [2000] QB 133, Law Reports, Queen’s Bench, pp. 142–3, 147–50 ICLR; Extract 19.1.1 from Lord Chesterfield v Harris [1908] 2 Ch 397, Law Reports, Chancery Division pp. 426–8 ICLR; Extract 19.1.2 from Re Ellenborough Park [1956] Ch 131, Law Reports, Chancery Division pp. 159–64, 173–7, 179–80, 183–5, 187 ICLR; Extract 19.1.7 from Phipps v Pears [1965] 1 QB 76, Law Reports, Queen’s Bench, pp. 82–3 ICLR; Extracts 19.1.10, 19.2.8 from Ward v Kirkland [1967] Ch 194, Law Reports, Chancery Division pp. 221–6 ICLR; Extract 19.1.11 from Moncrieff v Jamieson [2007] 1 WLR 2620, Weekly Law Reports, [47], [54–9], [139–40], [143–4] ICLR; Extracts 19.2.1, 19.2.2, 19.2.6 from Wheeldon v Burrows (1879) 12 Ch D 31, Law Reports, Chancery Division pp. 49–50, 58–60 ICLR; Extract 19.2.3 from Nickerson v Barraclough [1981] Ch 426, Law Reports, Chancery Division pp. 440–1 ICLR; Extract 19.2.5 from Wong v Beaumont Property Trust Ltd [1965] 1 QB 173, Law Reports, Queen’s Bench, pp. 178–81 ICLR; Extract 19.2.7 from Borman v Griffith [1930] 1 Ch 493, Law Reports, Chancery Division pp. 498–9 ICLR; Extract 19.2.9 from Wheeler v JJ Saunders Ltd [1996] Ch 19, Law Reports, Chancery Division pp. 25, 31 ICLR; Extracts 19.2.13, 19.2.15 from Green v Ashco Horticultural Ltd [1966] 1 WLR 889, Weekly Law Reports, pp. 896–8 ICLR; Extract 19.2.14 from Goldberg v Edwards [1950] Ch 247, Law Reports, Chancery Division pp. 255–8 ICLR; Extract 19.2.18 from Long v Gowlett [1923] 2 Ch 177, Law Reports, Chancery Division pp. 199–201 ICLR; Extract 19.2.19 from Kent v Kavanagh [2007] Ch 1, Law Reports, Chancery Division [43–6] ICLR; Extracts 19.2.21, 19.2.28 from Simmons v Dobson [1991] 1 WLR 720, Weekly Law Reports, pp. 722–4 ICLR; Extract 19.2.27 from Mills v Silver [1991] Ch 271, Law Reports, Chancery Division pp. 279–80, 290–1 ICLR; Extract 19.3.5 from Allen v Greenwood [1980] Ch 119, Law Reports, Chancery Division pp. 134–5 ICLR; Extract 19.4.1 from Wall v Collins [2007] Ch 390, Law Reports, Chancery Division, ICLR; Extract 19.4.3 from Cook v Mayor & Corporation of Bath (1868) LR 6 Eq 177, Law Reports, Equity Cases, pp. 179–80 ICLR; Extract 20.1.4 from Amsprop Trading Ltd v Harris Distribution Ltd [1997] 1 WLR 1025, Weekly Law Reports, pp. 1029–32 ICLR; Extract 20.2.2 from Rhone v Stephens [1994] 2 AC 310, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 317–22 ICLR; Extract 20.2.7 from University of East London v Barking and Dagenham LBC [2005] Ch 354, Law Reports, Chancery Division [28] ICLR; Extract 20.2.8 from Federated Homes Ltd v Mill Lodge Properties Ltd [1980] 1 WLR 594, Weekly Law Reports, pp. 603–7 ICLR; Extract 20.2.9 from Crest Nicholson Residential (South) Ltd v McAllister [2004] 1 WLR 2409, Weekly Law Reports, [29–34], [37], [39–44] ICLR; Extract 20.2.10 from Re Union of London & Smith’s Bank Ltd’s Conveyance, Miles v Easter [1933] Ch 611, Law Reports, Chancery Division
Acknowledgements
pp. 631–2 ICLR; Extract 20.2.11 from Roake v Chadha [1984] 1 WLR 40 (Ch D), Weekly Law Reports, pp. 46–7 ICLR; Extract 20.2.12 from Elliston v Reacher [1908] 2 Ch 374, Law Reports, Chancery Division pp. 384–5 ICLR; Extract 20.3.1 from Jaggard v Sawyer [1995] 1 WLR 269, Weekly Law Reports, pp. 286–90 ICLR; Extract 21.2.2 from United Bank of Kuwait plc v Sahib [1997] Ch 107, Law Reports, Chancery Division pp. 136–41 ICLR; Extract 21.3.1 from Barclays Bank plc v O’Brien [1994] 1 AC 180, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 188–91, 194–9 ICLR; Extract 21.3.3 from Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2) [2002] 2 AC 773, Law Reports Appeal Cases, [11–14], [18–22], [26–31], [38–9], [41–2], [44], [48–53], [55–7], [61–7], [69], [72–4], [79], [82], [84], [86–8], [108], [161], [171], [173–4] ICLR; Extract 21.3.4 from Credit Lyonnais Bank Nederland NV v Burch [1997] 1 All ER 144, All England Law Reports, pp. 150–2, 154–7 Lexis Nexis, Reproduced by permission of Reed Elsevier (UK) Limited trading as Lexis Nexis; Extract 21.3.5 from Yorkshire Bank plc v Tinsley [2004] 1 WLR 2380, Weekly Law Reports, [17–21], [35–6], ICLR; Extract 21.4.1 from Knightsbridge Estates Trust Ltd v Byrne [1939] Ch 441, Law Reports, Chancery Division pp. 454–7 ICLR; Extract 21.4.8 from Bradley v Carritt [1903] AC 253, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 256–7, 260–1, 276–80 ICLR; Extract 21.4.9 from Kreglinger v New Patagonia Meat and Cold Storage Co Ltd [1914] AC 25, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 40–4, 50, 59 ICLR; Extract 21.4.11 from Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Harper’s Garage (Stourport) Ltd [1968] AC 269, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 298, 341–2 ICLR; Extract 21.4.12 from Multiservice Bookbinding Ltd v Marden [1979] Ch 84, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 105, 108–12 ICLR; Extract 21.4.15 from Campbell v Holyland (1877) 7 Ch D 166, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 171–4 ICLR; Extracts 21.4.21, 21.4.22 from Habib Bank Ltd v Tailor [1982] 1 WLR 1218, Weekly Law Reports, pp. 1221–5 ICLR; Extract 21.4.23 from Western Bank Ltd v Schindler [1977] Ch 1, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 12–14, 25–6 ICLR; Extract 21.4.24 from Cheltenham & Gloucester BS v Norgan [1996] 1 WLR 343, Weekly Law Reports, pp. 352–4 ICLR; Extract 21.4.25 from First National Bank plc v Syed [1991] 2 All ER 250, All England Law Reports, pp. 255–6 Reproduced by permission of Reed Elsevier (U.K.) Limited, trading as Lexis Nexis; Extract 21.4.28 from Cheltenham & Gloucester BS plc v Booker [1997] 1 FLR 311, Family Law Reports, pp. 315–16 © Jordan Publishing Ltd.; Extract 21.4.36 from Cuckmere Brick Co Ltd v Mutual Finance Ltd [1971] Ch 949, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 965–6, 969 ICLR; Extract 21.4.39 from Silven Properties Ltd v Royal Bank of Scotland plc [2004] 1 WLR 997 (CA), Weekly Law Reports, pp. [4–5], [13–18] ICLR; Extract 21.4.42 from Palk v Mortgage Services Funding plc [1993] Ch 330, Law Reports, Chancery Division, pp. 336–40 ICLR; Extract 21.4.43 from Cheltenham & Gloucester plc v Krausz [1997] 1 WLR 1558, Law Reports Appeal Cases, pp. 1562–7 ICLR; Crown copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland; Parliamentary material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO on behalf of Parliament; Law Commission Reports are reproduced under the terms and conditions of the Open Government Licence (OGL).
In some instances we have been unable to trace the owners of copyright material, and we would appreciate any information that would enable us to do so.
